The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Educ.
Sec. Higher Education
Volume 9 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1389825
This article is part of the Research Topic Research on Teaching Strategies and Skills in Different Educational Stages View all 32 articles
Flipping the Anatomy Classroom: A Comparative Analysis of 16-Week and 8-Week Courses in a Community College
Provisionally accepted- 1 Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, United States
- 2 Department of Psychology, School of Education, Health and Human Behavior, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, Illinois, United States
- 3 Division of Natural Sciences, Department of Biology, Mt. San Antonio College, Walnut, United States
Using flipped teaching modality, a student-centered pedagogical approach, in community college courses remains an understudied area. This study explored the effectiveness of unflipped (UF), partially flipped (PF), and fully flipped (FF) teaching formats within the confines of an accelerated eight-week Introduction to Human Anatomy course at a community college. The purpose of this study was to examine flipped teaching in an accelerated anatomy course by comparing final examination scores between the UF, PF, and FF modalities, compare the effectiveness of flipped teaching between a regular (16-week) and an accelerated anatomy course, evaluate the effect of different teaching modalities on male and female students between a regular and an accelerated course; and examine UF, PF, and FF among the above-median and the below-median students. Students in the FF sections were required to read relevant chapter(s) in the textbook and review slides before class. Students in the PF sections were required to read the textbook and slides for 25% of the chapters. All students took the same final exams and similar section exams. Final exam scores were higher in the regular 16-week course than in the eight-week course for UF (p=0.0219) and PF (p=0.0183) modalities. The 16-week course had significantly higher final examination scores (p=0.0492; n=65) than the eight-week course. Male students scored significantly lower in the eight-week FF course (49.42±13.72) than in the eight-week PF (p=0.006) and 16-week FF (p=0.0008) formats and also compared to female students in the eight-week FF course (p=0.0121). Above-median students in the eight-week course had significantly lower scores in the FF modality (71.35±7.01) compared to PF (80.92±5.30) (p=0.009). Below-median students in the eight-week course had lower scores in the FF modality (52.25±11.48) compared to UF (p=0.0113) and PF (p=0.04). In conclusion, FF in a 16-week anatomy course resulted in higher final exam scores than in the eight-week course. The eight-week FF format affected male student scores. Both above- and below-median groups experienced similar effects when exposed to FF within the accelerated course. Further investigations are essential to inform the refinement of flipped teaching methodologies in community colleges, particularly in the context of accelerated courses.
Keywords: Gross anatomy education, undergraduate education, flipped classroom, student success, Course duration
Received: 22 Feb 2024; Accepted: 11 Jul 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Gopalan, Bruno, Daughrity and Nguyen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Chaya Gopalan, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Elizabeth Bruno
2