<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
    <rss version="2.0">
      <channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
        <title>Frontiers in Education | New and Recent Articles</title>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/education</link>
        <description>RSS Feed for Frontiers in Education | New and Recent Articles</description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <generator>Frontiers Feed Generator,version:1</generator>
        <pubDate>2026-08-17T01:22:04.514+00:00</pubDate>
        <ttl>60</ttl>
        <item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1793332</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1793332</link>
        <title><![CDATA[An exploratory ecosystems analysis of biomedical research training reveals persistent unmet needs from the perspectives of graduate students and program managers]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-08-14T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Emma L. Svenson</author><author>Fátima Sancheznieto</author>
        <description><![CDATA[IntroductionRecent attention to graduate student mental health, changing career landscapes, the individual financial burden of graduate school and postdoctoral pathways, and continued challenges to diversify academic training signal that the time is ripe for reimagining the vision, design, and implementation of biomedical research education and training in the United States.MethodsWe sought to assess biomedical graduate student needs and how they arose within the context of a large midwestern institution's school of medicine. We did this by conducting semi-structured focus groups of biomedical graduate students and staff graduate program managers at our institution. We then employed an ecosystems theoretical framework and situational analysis to analyze focus group data using NVivo software.ResultsOur results identify seven distinct categories of unmet graduate student needs, ranging from community building to the establishment of equitable, clear and transparent policies. We further elaborate on the complex relationship between these needs, and the various ecosystem levels impacting them.DiscussionOur results highlight the important role that relationships, such as those with graduate program managers, play for graduate students. We therefore conclude that greater support, including administrative, fiscal, and coordination for those who are supporting graduate students, as well as intentional and evidence-based programming centering on graduate student needs and voices, is warranted to develop training that will produce the next generation of biomedical leaders and professionals.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1876627</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1876627</link>
        <title><![CDATA[AI literacy and subject specialization in pre-service teacher education: a mixed-methods study of dimensional profiles and perceived pedagogical challenges]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-08-14T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Yu Hu</author><author>Lan Wang</author>
        <description><![CDATA[Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy has become an important component of teacher preparation, yet limited evidence is available on pre-service teachers’ self-reported AI literacy profiles and the challenges they perceive in connecting AI-related awareness with pedagogical practice. This study examined self-reported AI literacy and perceived pedagogical challenges among pre-service primary teachers using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. Survey data were collected from 161 third-year students in a university-based primary teacher education program in Central China, followed by semi-structured interviews with nine purposively selected participants. The study used a theoretically informed four-dimensional framework comprising AI Perception, AI Knowledge and Skills, AI Application and Innovation, and AI Ethics. Quantitative results showed a moderately high overall level of self-reported AI literacy, with AI Perception and AI Ethics slightly higher than AI Knowledge and Skills and AI Application and Innovation. Mathematics students reported higher self-rated scores than Chinese and English students across all four dimensions in this sample. The qualitative findings provided possible contextual interpretations of these survey patterns by highlighting participants’ perceptions of disciplinary alignment, unequal AI-related learning opportunities, limited subject-specific pedagogical support, and insufficient practicum-based experience. Participants recognized general ethical concerns but reported uncertainty about applying ethical principles to specific classroom situations.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1861765</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1861765</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Historical competences in curriculum documents and teaching resources used for teacher training at universities in the Southern Macrozone of Chile]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-08-14T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Elizabeth Montanares-Vargas</author><author>Daniel Llancavil-Llancavil</author><author>María José Ortiz-Suazo</author><author>Rodrigo Salazar-Jiménez</author><author>Bastian Carter-Thuillier</author>
        <description><![CDATA[IntroductionThe notion of historical thinking has become a central focus in the teaching of history, particularly in contexts affected by conflict where teaching certain topics is a priority. This is the case in Chile's Southern Macrozone in relation to the State–Mapuche conflict and the occupation of the Araucanía. The aim of this study was to describe the presence of historical competencies in the subject syllabuses used during Initial Teacher Training (ITT) for specialists in “History, Geography and Social Sciences” at universities located in this macro-region, with a focus on the teaching of issues related to the conflict.MethodsThe study employed a mixed-methods approach and a descriptive–comparative design to analyse 56 course programmes from four higher education institutions, using an analysis matrix focused on four dimensions: learning outcomes, content, methodology and assessment.ResultsThe results reveal that the “historical evidence” competence is the most frequently encountered in the programmes analysed, whilst “change and continuity” and “cause and effect” are rarely found and show little variation among institutions. In addition, “historical significance”, “historical perspective” and “ethical dimension” are defined in general terms and with limited reference to methodology and evaluation. Together, there is limited evidence of a direct link between these issues and the State–Mapuche conflict and the occupation of the Araucanía.DiscussionThese results suggest a need to strengthen the integration of historical thinking into the curriculum at the FID and to incorporate controversial territorial issues more explicitly, with a view to fostering teacher training that promotes critical and context-sensitive historical analysis in situations of conflict.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1918422</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1918422</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Evaluating pre-service primary school teachers’ didactic knowledge in mathematics through the planning of exploratory teaching practices integrating computational thinking]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-08-14T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Rita Neves Rodrigues</author><author>Fernando Martins</author><author>Sofia Gonçalves</author><author>Sónia Brito-Costa</author><author>Cecília Costa</author>
        <description><![CDATA[Lesson planning is a complex and central professional practice in teacher education, requiring the integrated mobilization of different types of didactic knowledge in mathematics. The recent integration of Computational Thinking into the Portuguese Mathematics curriculum reinforces the need to prepare pre-service primary school teachers to design teaching practices that promote the development of this mathematical ability. This study aims to evaluate the didactic knowledge in mathematics of pre-service teachers at three moments (Pre-Intervention, Post-Intervention I, and Post-Intervention II) throughout a training program, through the planning of Exploratory Teaching Practices integrating tasks designed to promote the development of the Computational Thinking dimensions of abstraction, decomposition, algorithm, debugging, and pattern recognition. Nineteen female Pre-Service Primary School Teachers, aged between 20 and 54 years (M = 24.47; SD = 9.576), participated in the study, enrolled in an Initial Teacher Training during the 2023/2024 academic year at a Portuguese higher education institution. Following a mixed methods design, the Levels of Suitability of the lesson plans and the Global Performance of the pre-service teachers were analyzed across the three moments. The results of the study show statistically significant differences both in the Levels of Suitability of the lesson plans for Exploratory Teaching Practices integrating Computational Thinking and in the Global Performance of the pre-service primary school teachers across the three moments. In conclusion, the present study provides evidence of how the didactic knowledge in mathematics of pre-service teachers can be evaluated through the planning of Exploratory Teaching Practices with the integration of Computational Thinking.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1891536</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1891536</link>
        <title><![CDATA[A comparative study of centralized upper secondary school-leaving mathematics examination tasks in Poland and North Rhine-Westphalia with respect to problem solving, modelling, and reasoning competencies]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-08-14T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Bruno Scheja</author><author>Anna Schreck</author><author>Benjamin Rott</author>
        <description><![CDATA[This study examines upper secondary school-leaving mathematics examination tasks from Poland (2005–2023) and the federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia (2007–2023) with regard to three central mathematical competencies: problem solving, modelling, and reasoning – and their competency levels. Drawing on the competency framework of Niss and Højgaard, a comparative document analysis was conducted using three competency-specific coding schemes. The analysis covers complete corpora of centralized basic-level mathematics examinations, comprising 570 Polish and 2,731 North Rhine-Westphalian tasks. The study first identifies and describes the distribution of competencies and competency levels within each examination system reflected in the examination tasks over the course of time. It then compares both systems statistically, identifying similarities and differences in the distribution of competency demands. The results reveal distinct competency profiles in the mathematics examination tasks from Poland and North Rhine-Westphalia. In North Rhine-Westphalia, modelling constitutes the dominant competency demand, whereas problem solving and reasoning occur considerably less frequently. In contrast, Polish examination tasks show higher levels of problem solving, while modelling and reasoning play only a minor role. In both systems, higher competency levels occur only rarely across all three competencies. By providing the first comprehensive comparison of complete upper secondary school-leaving mathematics examination corpora from Poland and North Rhine-Westphalia, this study contributes to research on competence-oriented assessment. The findings contribute to discussions on examination design, the implementation of competency-oriented curricula, educational quality, and the comparability of upper secondary school-leaving qualifications within the European educational area.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1852558</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1852558</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Technology-supported methodological foundations for teaching innovative urban development in school geography]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-08-14T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Nursultan Salimzhanov</author><author>Duman Aliaskarov</author><author>Sagyngali Kalkashev</author><author>Aliya Ayapbekova</author><author>Mehmet Somuncu</author>
        <description><![CDATA[IntroductionRapid urbanization, digitalization, and sustainability challenges require school geography to move beyond descriptive approaches toward analytical, technology-supported learning about urban systems. This study developed and evaluated a methodological framework for integrating smart and sustainable city concepts into secondary school geography through a place-based elective course focused on Almaty, Kazakhstan.MethodsThe framework was implemented in a 34-hour ninth-grade elective course, Geography of Cities: Almaty, combining a content-structural model, local case studies, authentic urban datasets, Google Earth materials, and mobile learning activities delivered through the Bilim All application. A quasi-experimental design compared experimental and control groups. Data were collected using a baseline diagnostic test, a post-intervention achievement assessment, student questionnaires, and classroom observations. Between-group differences were examined using the Mann–Whitney U test.ResultsThe experimental group achieved higher post-intervention scores than the control group across all seven assessed content areas. Statistically significant differences were found in each area, with the largest gaps in demography and urbanization, settlement classification, and functional zoning. Functional zoning and urban functions nevertheless remained comparatively challenging, indicating persistent difficulties with applied map-based and data-based reasoning.DiscussionThe findings support the value of a technology-supported, place-based framework for urban geography education and provide practical guidance for integrating local data, digital tools, and urban case analysis into school curricula. Because intact classes and non-random group assignment were used, the results indicate a significant association with improved learning outcomes rather than definitive causal effectiveness.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1790135</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1790135</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Pre-service teachers' general pedagogical knowledge and pedagogical learning opportunities at entry into induction: comparing traditional and alternative teacher education programs]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-08-14T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Jonas Weyers</author><author>Annalena Johnen</author><author>Lilith C. Voeth</author><author>Sandra Heine</author><author>Johannes König</author>
        <description><![CDATA[Globally, increasing numbers of individuals enter the teaching profession through alternative teacher education programs without prior university studies in teacher education or pedagogy. Compared to traditional programs, these alternative programs—for example, lateral entry programs in Germany, the country of the present study—are often considerably shorter and place a strong emphasis on in-school training. However, it remains unclear to what extent pre-service teachers (PST) in alternative programs (A-PST) possess general pedagogical knowledge (GPK) comparable to that of PST in traditional programs (T-PST), and whether potential gaps can be compensated for during in-school training as part of induction. This study conceptualizes GPK as a key outcome of university-based initial teacher education and additionally examines opportunities to learn (OTL) in pedagogical content and in-school learning activities that may underlie such knowledge development. Focusing on teacher education in North Rhine-Westphalia, the most populous federal state in Germany, the study compares A-PST and T-PST with respect to GPK, assessed using a standardized performance-based test, and self-reported OTL at the beginning of induction. Regression analyses reveal higher GPK among T-PST than A-PST in primary teacher education, whereas no significant differences emerge among secondary school PST. Across these teaching types, A-PST report fewer OTL related to pedagogical content but more extensive in-school OTL in lesson planning and teaching. After the preparatory semester of lateral entry, which precedes induction and requires teaching practice and pedagogical coursework, A-PST catch up with respect to content-related OTL but do not reach the same level of GPK as primary education T-PST at induction entry. Longitudinal analyses using latent change score models, however, reveal significant developments in both GPK and OTL among A-PST during the preparatory semester, although no significant associations between knowledge gains and OTL gains are found. Overall, the findings support that university-based teacher education effectively promotes GPK among primary school T-PST while also highlighting the potential of alternative programs to compensate for missing OTL through targeted training.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1903290</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1903290</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Understanding student satisfaction in performing arts education: a grounded theory study of undergraduate musical theatre education in China]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-08-14T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Xiaoxi Xu</author><author>Wannaporn Siripala</author>
        <description><![CDATA[Student satisfaction is widely used as an important indicator of higher education quality and teaching effectiveness. However, existing research has largely been developed within general higher education contexts and offers limited explanation of how student satisfaction is formed in practice-intensive performing arts programmes. Undergraduate musical theatre education, which combines embodied training, cross-skill integration, rehearsal practice, and translation into stage performance, provides a valuable context for reexamining student satisfaction in performing arts education. Therefore, this study aims to explore how student satisfaction is formed in undergraduate musical theatre education and to develop a process-oriented model explaining its underlying mechanisms. Drawing on a procedural grounded theory approach, this study conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 students and recent graduates from five Chinese institutions with relatively well-established undergraduate musical theatre programmes. The interview data were analysed through open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. The analysis generated 36 open-coding categories, which were further organized into 12 main categories: teaching conditions, curriculum and time structure, performance support, training continuity, pedagogy and feedback, integrated training quality, creative and humanistic development, practice and external linkages, perceived capability development, perceived career readiness, commitment and alignment, and overall satisfaction. Based on these findings, the study developed a training-continuity model of student satisfaction. The results indicate that structural conditions shape students' learning experiences by enabling or disrupting training continuity, while pedagogical transformation mechanisms further influence perceived capability development and perceived career readiness. These perceptions contribute to overall satisfaction by strengthening professional identification, perceived assessment fairness, and willingness to remain engaged. This study shifts the understanding of student satisfaction from a service-quality perspective commonly used in general higher education to a training-system perspective suited to practice-intensive performing arts education. It identifies training continuity as a central mechanism linking structural conditions, pedagogical processes, and outcome perceptions, and provides practical implications for improving undergraduate musical theatre curricula.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1884961</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1884961</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Using activity theory to inform the design of academic resources for first-year engineering students]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-08-14T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Gayoung Kim</author><author>Chamille Lescott</author>
        <description><![CDATA[IntroductionUniversity academic resources such as tutoring, office hours, and peer-led study programs are key institutional tools for supporting student learning, but these resources are often underutilized by the students who need them most. A student's ability and willingness to seek academic help are strongly correlated with student retention. Academic resources play a role in both the academic and social spheres of a student's college experience and may impact a student's decision to persist in a challenging discipline or remain enrolled at their institution. This qualitative study examines how socio-institutional culture shapes first-year engineering students' navigation of academic resources.MethodsUsing cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT) as an analytical lens, researchers conducted twenty semi-structured interviews to identify internal, social, and structural contradictions that shape help-seeking behaviors.ResultsThematic analysis revealed three interrelated cultural norms: Hustle Culture, Collaborative Culture, and Academic Hierarchy. Each norm generated systemic contradictions, including belonging versus bandwidth, peer networks that gatekeep less popular resources, and the hidden curriculum surrounding expert support. When asked how to address these contradictions, study participants proposed consolidating resources, increasing transparency, and amplifying peer recommendations.DiscussionThe process of mapping activity system contradictions, naming cultural norms, and generating student-centered design opportunities is transferable across institutional contexts and useful to first-year experience practitioners, academic support directors, and advising offices seeking to co-create interventions that are responsive to their students' sociocultural realities.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1908552</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1908552</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Development and pilot testing of multi-stakeholder questionnaires for assessing University 4.0 transformation in higher education institutions]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-08-14T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Fatima Abnoulgid</author><author>Sarah Aouhassi</author><author>Khalifa Mansouri</author><author>Fatiha Akef</author><author>Mohamed Lamine Soudani</author>
        <description><![CDATA[IntroductionThe transition to University 4.0 requires higher education institutions to develop reliable and context-appropriate tools capable of evaluating digital, pedagogical, research, and governance transformations from the perspective of multiple stakeholders. In Morocco, the available evaluation tools remain limited, as they were developed in different institutional contexts or focus on isolated aspects of digital transformation. This study aimed to develop, test, and exploratorily refine a set of multi-stakeholder questionnaires designed to assess the transition to University 4.0 in Moroccan higher education institutions.MethodsSix questionnaires were developed for students, faculty members and administrative staff, covering Education 4.0, Research 4.0 and Governance 4.0. Their refinement combined pilot tests, psychometric indicators, XAI-based item importance using SHAP and importance by permutation, as well as content validation based on expertise.ResultsFollowing the combined process of psychometrics, XAI, and expert review, 52 of the initial 183 items were retained, 51 required reformulation, and 80 were recommended for removal. The student questionnaires showed the strongest overall preliminary performance. Student_Education exhibited questionable internal consistency (α = 0.663) and an average corrected item-total correlation of 0.253, while reaching a relatively high S-CVI/Ave of 0.894. Student_Gov_Research demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.794), an average corrected item-total correlation of 0.297, close to the conventional criterion of 0.30, and the highest S-CVI/Ave value (0.941).DiscussionThe results support the use of XAI as an exploratory decision-support tool for the refinement of questionnaires when combined with psychometric evidence, theoretical considerations, and expert judgment. The refined instruments remain pilot prototypes and require further validation using larger, balanced, and multi-institutional samples.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1777033</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1777033</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Adaptive Digital Portfolio Assessment yields sustained equitable arts gains: a longitudinal randomized controlled trial with mixed-methods integration]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-08-14T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author> Taswadi</author><author>Galih J. Kurnia</author><author>Badrul Isa</author>
        <description><![CDATA[This study evaluates the Adaptive Digital Portfolio Assessment (ADPA) framework designed to address assessment inequities in arts education within the Global South. We conducted a 12-month longitudinal randomized controlled trial involving 1,200 senior secondary (SMA) students across 60 schools in West Java, Indonesia, as part of a broader national study across multiple Indonesian provinces. Utilizing Latent Growth Curve Modeling, Mediation Analysis, and Moderated Mediation, we tracked artistic competence trajectories and psychological pathways grounded in Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and Expectancy-Value Theory. Qualitative Reflexive Thematic Analysis (n = 135) provided mechanistic depth. The ADPA intervention group exhibited significantly steeper growth trajectories in artistic competence (slope = 2.34 points/month vs. control = 0.41 points/month; p < .001; d = 0.94), with 78% of these gains persisting at the 12-month follow-up (d = 0.61). Mediation analysis revealed that psychological internalization processes, specifically competence satisfaction, autonomy satisfaction, and task value realization, accounted for 37.8% of the total effect initially, declining to 28.4% by month 12, aligning with the theoretical framework. Crucially for equity, low-socioeconomic status (SES) students achieved effect sizes (d = 0.89) nearly identical to middle-SES peers (d = 0.99; interaction p = .674), demonstrating that ADPA substantially reduced differential effects associated with socioeconomic background as a predictor of artistic growth. Negative case analysis identified algorithmic opacity and device accessibility as critical boundary conditions. The ADPA framework demonstrates that equity-first educational technology design can effectively bridge achievement gaps, offering a scalable model to substantially reduce socioeconomic barriers to creative development in resource-limited environments.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1768531</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1768531</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Patterns of participation: describing student engagement across agricultural education components]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-08-14T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>William Norris</author><author>Roger Hanagriff</author><author>Lacey Roberts-Hill</author><author>Krysti Kelley</author><author>Clarissa Darby</author><author>Don Edgar</author><author>Kirk Swortzel</author>
        <description><![CDATA[IntroductionAgricultural education aims to prepare students for careers in agriculture and related industries through three critical components: classroom and laboratory instruction, leadership through the National FFA Organization (FFA), and supervised agricultural experiences (SAEs). This combination of learning strategies is critical to agricultural education's student engagement, which can lead to increased career preparedness, the development of employability skills, and becoming an informed consumer of agricultural products.MethodsThis study analyzed data from the Agricultural Experience Tracker (AET), a web-based record-keeping platform used by agricultural educators for SAE and FFA records. The data were collected from 230,228 students in 1,245 agricultural education programs in nine purposively selected states. This data was utilized to describe patterns of student engagement in FFA and SAE activities. We used Welch's F-test to assess statistical differences in FFA and SAE engagement between states included in the study.ResultsWe found that annual FFA and SAE engagement varied among students, with only 24.56% of members engaged in community service, 35.19% engaged in at least two FFA activities at the local level or higher, 33.37% of first-year students with an SAE project with over 10 h of engagement, and 29.29% of continuing students participating in an SAE project with over 50 h of engagement. Furthermore, the results indicated that some states included in the study engaged students in FFA and SAE at significantly higher rates than other states.DiscussionEngagement in SAE was most common among first-year students participating in a foundational project, though this often did not translate into sustained involvement in an immersion project. It is recommended that educators further integrate FFA and SAE components into classroom instruction and that agricultural education continue to expand opportunities for participation and ensure equity for all students. Additionally, states with lower rates of FFA and SAE engagement should use states with higher rates as examples to identify effective strategies to increase participation.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1862260</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1862260</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Supervision in educational leadership: practices, challenges, and innovations in the UAE — a multi-level coupling analysis of the current and future]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-08-14T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Policy and Practice Reviews</category>
        <author>Hosam R. I. Badawy</author><author>Tamara Alshloul</author><author>Hesham R. I. Badawy</author><author>Khawla M. Hassan Almaazmi</author><author>Wissal Mohsen</author>
        <description><![CDATA[Educational supervision has evolved internationally from a narrow inspection-and-compliance function toward a developmental practice supporting instructional leadership, professional learning, and sustained school improvement. This Policy Review examines UAE supervision through loose-coupling and instructional leadership theories. Using a structured narrative-synthesis methodology (Section <br>3), the review draws on 54 sources — 15 UAE-specific empirical or policy sources and 39 international theoretical, comparative, meta-analytic, or methodological sources — benchmarked against four contrasting international supervision models (Section <br>5). The review shows that the UAE's multi-authority governance structure (Ministry of Education, Abu Dhabi Department of Education and Knowledge, Knowledge and Human Development Authority) produces a loosely coupled accountability system that becomes progressively tighter, and more consequential for teaching quality, as it approaches the classroom. Current supervisory practice is dominated by observation-and-documentation cycles whose developmental value depends heavily on evaluator capacity, feedback quality, and psychological safety — moderators that international meta-analytic evidence identifies as the mechanisms through which supervision raises or fails to raise instructional quality. A critical synthesis finds UAE research concentrated among a relatively small number of overlapping teams and dominated by small-sample qualitative case studies, with regulator-published policy documents supplementing the peer-reviewed literature in ways that call for cautious generalization. Benchmarked internationally, the UAE emerges as an evolving hybrid model — sharing features with high-stakes European/English inspection, a design associated elsewhere with workforce-retention concerns, while also drawing on elements of Finland's trust-based supervision, and without yet incorporating a Singapore-style competency-track infrastructure for converting accountability data into developmental pathways. Current supervisory practice is dominated by observation-and-documentation cycles whose developmental value depends heavily on evaluator capacity, feedback quality, and psychological safety — moderators that international meta-analytic evidence identifies as the mechanisms through which supervision raises or fails to raise instructional quality. Building on this critique, the authors propose a conceptual model integrating governance, institutional, and classroom-level supervision, and identify four evidence-based innovation trajectories: coaching-oriented supervision (0.49 SD on instruction, 0.18 SD on achievement), AI-assisted instructional feedback, digitally mediated evidence systems, and cross-regulator coherence reform. Two comparative tables and a meta-analytic benchmark table render UAE and international evidence side by side. The contribution is fourfold: this is the first UAE supervision review to apply an explicit coupling-theory lens, make its methodology transparent, position the UAE against international models through international contextual benchmarking, and render its three-authority system as a single conceptual diagram for policymakers and school leaders.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1892041</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1892041</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Educational supervision in GCC school systems is shaped by inspection, accountability, and context-sensitive instructional leadership: a systematic review]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-08-14T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Systematic Review</category>
        <author>Hesham R. I. Badawy</author><author>Tamara Alshloul</author><author>Hosam R. I. Badawy</author><author>Shaikha M. Al Zaabi</author><author>Maram Al-Hasan</author>
        <description><![CDATA[IntroductionEducational supervision in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) school systems has expanded beyond classroom observation to encompass teacher evaluation, school inspection, quality assurance, instructional leadership, mentoring, coaching, professional learning, and technology-supported supervision. However, evidence remains dispersed across several related literatures.MethodsThis systematic review synthesised 40 studies addressing direct clinical, instructional, and developmental supervision; teacher evaluation and data-driven appraisal; school inspection and quality assurance; instructional and middle leadership; and coaching, mentoring, onboarding, and professional learning. The review followed a transparent systematic procedure informed by PRISMA and qualitative evidence-synthesis principles, including explicit eligibility criteria, database searching, screening, extraction, appraisal, and thematic synthesis.ResultsSix cross-cutting themes were identified: supervision as an institutional continuum, feedback quality, role ambiguity and distributed supervision, inspection–development tension, data and technology, and professional-learning integration. Supervision emerged as a multi-level institutional practice shaped by accountability pressures, leadership mediation, feedback processes, and professional-learning capacity.DiscussionThe review develops a GCC-sensitive conceptualisation of supervision ranging from compliance-oriented monitoring to developmental capacity building. Effective reform requires stronger feedback literacy, protected professional dialogue, clearer differentiation between evaluation and coaching, and evidence-informed alignment among inspection, leadership development, and teacher professional learning.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1922560</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1922560</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Subjective AI decision-making significance (SAID) in high-school students]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-08-14T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Elena M. D. Schönthaler</author><author>Melanie Lenger</author><author>Philipp Kranabitl</author><author>Markus Trofaier</author><author>Hannes Hick</author><author>Alfred Häussl</author><author>Hannah Lackner</author><author>Linda Kratzer</author><author>Anton Schleinitz</author><author>Ina Zwigl</author><author>Eva Z. Reininghaus</author><author>Nina Dalkner</author>
        <description><![CDATA[BackgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) is now a widespread everyday tool and its impact has been researched in various domains of life. However, little is known about how AI affects decision-making in daily life, especially in young individuals, who experience the use of AI at an early age. This study explored how high school students perceive and use AI in everyday decision-making, thereby conducting an initial validation of a novel phenomenon termed subjective AI decision-making significance (SAID).MethodsAn online survey of 197 Austrian students assessed SAID with decision-making scenarios that were previously developed together with stakeholders. Moreover, attitudes toward AI, self-efficacy, and subjective physical and mental health were measured using questionnaires. Factor analyses were conducted to observe underlying constructs of SAID and regression analyses were administered to predict these factors from attitudes, self-efficacy, subjective health and demographic variables.ResultsUsing factor analysis, two SAID factors emerged: ethical/social and practical decision-making. Both correlated with perceived AI helpfulness. Moreover, lower self-efficacy was linked to greater subjective significance of AI for decision-making in ethical/moral and social contexts.ConclusionThese preliminary findings suggest that students perceive AI as a helpful tool for both ethical/moral and social decision-making as well as practical decision-making. However, they also underscore the need to enhance AI literacy, especially among students with lower self-efficacy, to support informed use, critical reflection and independent thinking. Future research should investigate additional variables, including AI experience and personality traits.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1878794</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1878794</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Adaptive technology-change confidence among Saudi university faculty under Vision 2030: a three-wave longitudinal mixed-methods study]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-08-13T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Tahani H. Alqahtani</author>
        <description><![CDATA[PurposeSaudi higher education under Vision 2030 imposes cycles of technical change shorter than typical academic tenures. This paper estimates within-person dynamics of adaptive technology-change confidence (ATCC)—a newly developed, exploratory personal resource construct (Conservation of Resources; Job Demands–Resources) requiring further validation—over 27 months, and tests whether decline is patterned by directly measured university-level substrate turnover.DesignA three-wave panel of Saudi university faculty (T1 n = 431, 11 universities; T3 retention 77.7%) combined faculty self-reports, department chair ratings of academic performance (AP), and learning and development (L&D) lead reports of substrate turnover [the institutionally reported pace of major digital infrastructure change—learning management system updates, artificial intelligence tool adoptions, and platform deprecations], with 29 nested longitudinal interviews (longitudinal core n = 7). Analyses included latent growth modelling, the random-intercept cross-lagged panel model, and latent class growth analysis.FindingsATCC declined within person across the observation window (p < 0.001). Three trajectory classes emerged (stable, gradual decline, and steep decline). Within-person change in ATCC was associated with subsequent change in chair-rated AP more strongly than the reverse (directional asymmetry, p = 0.009; because the design is observational, this is interpreted as directional rather than causal evidence). Higher university-level substrate turnover was associated with steeper decline (p = 0.005), consistent with a preliminary timescale-dependency conjecture. Findings were robust across five quantitative sensitivity specifications, with qualitative–quantitative concordance support.Originality and practical implicationsThe paper integrates longitudinal qualitative interviews and direct substrate-turnover measurement within a multi-source mixed-methods panel, providing within-person evidence on adaptive confidence in a non-Western higher education context. Faculty development centres operating under Vision 2030 may benefit from periodic (e.g., quarterly) ATCC monitoring as an early-warning indicator, with targeted L&D outreach to the steep-decliner trajectory class. Principal limitations include reliance on an author-developed ATCC scale requiring independent psychometric replication and a level-2 sample of only 11 universities, which constrains the substrate-turnover moderation. Findings should therefore be read as preliminary and specific to the Saudi single-sector context.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1913646</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1913646</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Project-based learning as a tool for developing teamwork skills in IT students]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-08-13T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Brief Research Report</category>
        <author>Yelena Spirina</author><author>Nadezhda Gorbunova</author><author>Nadezhda Popova</author><author>Saltanat Kopbalina</author><author>Gulim Tursyngaliyeva</author><author>Irina Samoilova</author>
        <description><![CDATA[Despite the widespread use of Project-Based Learning (PjBL) in higher education, its role in developing teamwork skills among IT students remains insufficiently explored. This study evaluates the effectiveness of PjBL in a Web Technologies course and identifies the pedagogical conditions that promote teamwork competence. The study involved 93 students of the Information Systems educational program, who were divided into experimental (EG) and control groups (CG). For EG, the training was conducted within the framework of PjBL, a team project was carried out, while CG was trained using traditional methods. The project assignments were developed in collaboration with IT industry professionals and were designed to simulate authentic real-world professional tasks. Project teams were formed based on Belbin's team role model. Teamwork skills were assessed using Stephenson's Q-sort methodology, while academic performance was evaluated based on test results. Statistical analysis included Pearson's χ² test, Student's t-test, Cramer's V, and Cohen's d. The experimental group demonstrated improvements across all assessed dimensions of teamwork and a statistically significant increase in academic performance compared with the control group (p < 0.05): the mean score increased from 67.0% to 83.4% (Δ = 16.4%; p < 0.0001). The study shows that the effective implementation of PjBL in IT education depends not only on project tasks but also on balanced team and the objective assessment of teamwork skills. The findings advance the understanding of the mechanisms involved in developing teamwork competence and provide a methodological foundation for designing competency-based educational programs in IT education.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1861960</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1861960</link>
        <title><![CDATA[How consistent is the algorithm? Examining the intra- and inter-rater reliability of LLM-based writing assessment]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-08-13T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Bayan AlAmir</author>
        <description><![CDATA[Unlike constrained constructed-response assessments, the reliability of essay-based assessments has long been debated in language education research. Recently, AI—particularly large language models—has been proposed as a tool to enhance scoring reliability. This study examines the reliability of LLM-based scoring in writing assessment. OpenAI's ChatGPT assessed 192 essays written by EFL learners using a criterion-based analytic rubric covering task achievement, grammatical range and accuracy, lexical resources, organization, and mechanics. Scoring was replicated after three weeks under similar conditions. The two rounds were compared to assess intra-rater reliability and then contrasted with human ratings to assess inter-rater reliability. Results indicated high intra-rater reliability, particularly for task achievement and organization. Lower consistency was observed for mechanics and grammatical accuracy, suggesting a need for clearer criteria or further model training. Human–AI comparisons showed slight to fair exact agreement (Cohen's kappa) and moderate agreement when accounting for the degree of disagreement.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1916590</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1916590</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Unveiling the individual predictors of prestigious award-winning among gifted students: academic achievement, gender, and cognitive ability]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-08-13T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Abdullah M. Aljughaiman</author><author>Norah Almulhim</author>
        <description><![CDATA[Winning prestigious awards for gifted students is a highly valued goal sought by many educational institutions, as it reflects the excellence of their gifted students and the quality of their educational outcomes. Despite the importance of the issue, few studies have examined the factors that contribute to this success; this study examines the extent to which individual factors, namely academic achievement, gender, and cognitive ability, predict gifted students’ likelihood of winning prestigious awards. A total of 304 officially identified gifted students ranging in the age group of 12 to 17 years attended intermediate and secondary schools in Saudi Arabia. The students reported winning prestigious local and international awards across various fields (academic, scientific, and artistic). The results suggest that academic achievement played an important role in winning local awards, while cognitive ability played a more prominent role in securing international awards. The results also show some gender-based differences. The implications of these results for the promotion of gifted students are discussed.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1910005</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2026.1910005</link>
        <title><![CDATA[AI-enhanced communicative-situational technologies for developing linguocultural competence in pre-service language teachers]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-08-13T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Bibigul Utegaliyeva</author><author>Galiya Kismetova</author><author>Klzhiyan Shunaibekova</author><author>Saule Kadirgaliyeva</author><author>Astra Gabdesheva</author><author>Berik Matayev</author>
        <description><![CDATA[The increasing internationalization of higher education and the growing cultural diversity of educational environments have highlighted the need to develop linguocultural competence among future language teachers. This study aimed to design, implement, and evaluate an AI-enhanced communicative-situational model for developing linguocultural competence among pre-service language teachers. A quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test design was employed with 280 undergraduate students enrolled in a Foreign Language Teacher Education programme. Participants were assigned to an experimental group (n = 140) and a control group (n = 140). The experimental group participated in a 12-week intervention integrating communicative-situational technologies and ChatGPT-5. The control group received traditional foreign language instruction based on reading comprehension, vocabulary and grammar practice, textbook-based discussions, and teacher-centered learning activities. Linguocultural competence was assessed through a rubric-based instrument measuring Cognitive-Conceptual, Pragmatic-Communicative, and Professional Cross-Cultural Competence. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, mixed-design ANOVA, and Pearson correlation analysis. The findings revealed significant improvements across all dimensions of linguocultural competence, with the experimental group demonstrating substantially greater gains than the control group. Significant Time × Group interaction effects were found for Cognitive-Conceptual Competence, F(1,278) = 40.72, p < .001, η2p = .128, Pragmatic-Communicative Competence, F(1,278) = 24.86, p < .001, η2p = .082, and Professional Cross-Cultural Competence, F(1,278) = 19.41, p < .001, η2p = .065. Strong positive correlations were identified among all competence dimensions (r = .630–.786, p < .001). The results suggest that AI-enhanced communicative-situational technologies effectively support the development of linguocultural competence by fostering authentic intercultural communication, reflection, and professional decision-making. The proposed model offers practical implications for teacher education in multilingual and multicultural contexts.]]></description>
      </item>
      </channel>
    </rss>