Abstract
Kisspeptin and its receptor are central to reproductive health acting as key regulators of the reproductive endocrine axis in humans. Kisspeptin is most widely recognised as a regulator of gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) neuronal function. However, recent evidence has demonstrated that kisspeptin and its receptor also play a fundamental role during pregnancy in the regulation of placentation. Kisspeptin is abundantly expressed in syncytiotrophoblasts, and its receptor in both cyto- and syncytio-trophoblasts. Circulating levels of kisspeptin rise dramatically during healthy pregnancy, which have been proposed as having potential as a biomarker of placental function. Indeed, alterations in kisspeptin levels are associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal and foetal complications. This review summarises data evaluating kisspeptin’s role as a putative biomarker of pregnancy complications including miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy (EP), preterm birth (PTB), foetal growth restriction (FGR), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), pre-eclampsia (PE), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD).
Introduction
Kisspeptin is best known for its role as a hypothalamic neuropeptide that regulates gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) secretion (). Indeed, early studies showed that inactivating variants of the kisspeptin receptor result in pubertal failure due to hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism, confirming the importance of kisspeptin signalling to reproductive health (, ).
During pregnancy, kisspeptin is produced in large amounts by the placenta and thus there is significant interest in evaluating its potential as a novel marker of pregnancy complications (). Kisspeptin is a peptide encoded by the KISS-1 gene that binds to a G-protein coupled kisspeptin receptor (KISS-1R, previously known as the orphan receptor GPR54) (). Kisspeptin levels in the circulation are several hundred fold higher during healthy pregnancy compared to the non-pregnant state (, ). This review will summarise data evaluating kisspeptin’s role as a putative biomarker of pregnancy complications including miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy (EP), preterm birth (PTB), foetal growth restriction (FGR), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), pre-eclampsia (PE), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), and gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD).
Kisspeptin
The gene encoding kisspeptin (KISS-1) was first identified in 1996 as a metastasis tumour-suppressor gene in malignant melanoma cell lines and its peptide product was initially termed ‘metastin’ (). Subsequently, it became known as kisspeptin in homage to its discovery in Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA, the hometown of the famous chocolate Hershey’s kisses (). The KISS-1 gene, located on chromosome 1q32, encodes a 145 amino acid prepropeptide that is post-translationally cleaved into biologically active kisspeptin peptides of different amino acid lengths indicated by their suffix: e.g. kisspeptin -54, -14, -13, and -10 (, , ). All of these peptides bind and activate the kisspeptin receptor through their shared C-terminal region decapeptide motif (Arg-Phe-NH2) (, ). Kisspeptin is expressed in multiple tissues including the hypothalamus, limbic system, gonads, pancreas, and liver, but is particularly abundant in the placenta, and thus is believed to play an important role in pregnancy (, ).
Kisspeptin in Healthy Pregnancy
Kisspeptin plays a key role in implantation and decidualisation. Kisspeptin promotes embryo attachment to the endometrium through interaction with cell adhesion molecules, and stimulates stromal decidualisation by up-regulating leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) () (Figure 1). Kisspeptin also attenuates the excessive migration and invasion of trophoblasts through inhibition of the matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) 2 and 9 (–). Kisspeptin may also impact angiogenesis and uterine spiral artery modelling (–). A further relevant mechanism of kisspeptin in pregnancy relates to the maternal immune tolerance needed to avoid foetal rejection. Indeed, in vitro incubation with kisspeptin at levels corresponding to those found in pregnancy, results in increased differentiation of human naive T cells into T-regulatory cells ().
Figure 1
The placenta is considered the main source of kisspeptin during pregnancy and the KISS-1/Kiss-1 gene is expressed in syncytiotrophoblasts, whereas its receptor is expressed in both cytotrophoblasts and syncytiotrophoblasts () (Table 1). Expression of kisspeptin and its receptor is high during early pregnancy and declines as the placenta matures, thus highlighting kisspeptin’s role in placentation (). Interestingly, circulating kisspeptin levels increase linearly with advancing gestation and kisspeptin-54 immunoreactivity dramatically rises from 1230 pmol/L during the first trimester to 9590 pmol/L during the third trimester and returns to non-pregnant levels (<100 pmol/L) soon after birth (8 pmol/L) (, , ).
Table 1
| Pregnancy state | KISS-1 expression | KISS-1 receptor expression | Circulating Kisspeptin levels |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Pregnancy | Increased in first trimester () - Villous cytotrophoblasts | Increased in first trimester () - Villous cytotrophoblasts - Syncytiotrophoblasts - Extravillous cells | Increase linearly with pregnancy progression () |
| Miscarriage | Reduced () - Trophoblasts | No difference in women with recurrent pregnancy loss () | Reduced (–) |
| Ectopic pregnancy | Reduced () - Embryonic tissue | NA | Reduced (, ) No difference () |
| Preterm Birth | Increased () - Placental tissue | NA | No difference (, ) (unadjusted KP higher in late first trimester) () |
| Foetal Growth Restriction | NA | NA | Reduced (–) |
| Pre-Eclampsia | Increased (–) Increased (EPE) () No difference (LPE) () Decreased (, ) - Placental tissue | Increased (, ) No difference () - Placental tissue | Reduced in PE: 1st trimester (, ), 2nd trimester (–), 3rd trimester (, –) Reduced in EPE 9-13 wks () No difference in PE (, ) Increased in LPE 9-13 wks () No difference in PIH (, ) No difference in HDP: 1st and 2nd trimesters () Increased in HDP: 3rd trimester () |
| Gestational Diabetes | Increased (, ) - Syncytiotrophoblasts - Cytotrophoblasts | Increased (, ) - Syncytiotrophoblasts - Cytotrophoblast | No difference () Reduced (, , ) |
| Gestational Trophoblastic disease | Molar pregnancy: No difference (, ) Choriocarcinoma: Decreased (, ) | Molar pregnancy: No difference (, ) Choriocarcinoma: Decreased (, ) | Choriocarcinoma: Increased () |
Summary of Kisspeptin gene, receptor and circulating levels in different pregnancy states.
EPE, early onset pre-eclampsia; HDP, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; KP, kisspeptin; LPE, late onset pre-eclampsia; NA, not applicable; PE, pre-eclampsia; PIH, pregnancy induced hypertension.
Circulating kisspeptin levels are affected by several variables in healthy pregnancy (). Whilst gestational and maternal age are associated with raised kisspeptin levels, Afro-Caribbean ethnicity, smoking during pregnancy, and high body mass index (BMI) are associated with reduced kisspeptin levels (). Additionally, kisspeptin levels have been shown to be lower in serum compared to plasma samples, and are influenced by pre-analytical factors such as collection tube type, processing time and time to sample storage ().
Kisspeptin in Pregnancy Complications
1. Kisspeptin in Miscarriage
Miscarriage is the spontaneous loss of an intrauterine pregnancy before 24 weeks of gestation and affects 1 in 5 clinical pregnancies (). Miscarriage predominantly occurs during the first trimester of pregnancy and the majority of early miscarriages are due to a genetic abnormality of the developing embryo, however other causes include endocrine, anatomical, and immunological factors ().
Miscarriage diagnosis can be challenging as often a pregnancy is failing for a time before pregnancy loss has conclusively been confirmed. This uncertainty can exacerbate the psychological burden related to investigating possible miscarriage, with up to 6% of women suffering from moderate-severe depression, 17% from moderate-severe anxiety and 18% from post-traumatic stress disorder (). To date, there is no clinical predictor of miscarriage, however recent data demonstrates a potential for kisspeptin as a biomarker of miscarriage.
Kisspeptin levels (adjusted for gestation) are markedly reduced by 60-79% in women with miscarriage compared to healthy pregnancy (–) (Table 2.1). Above average levels, when corrected for gestational age, are reassuring with a <1% chance of miscarriage (), whereas kisspeptin levels 95% lower than the median for that gestation are associated with up to an 85% chance of miscarriage. Concordantly, KISS-1 expression is decreased in the placentae of women with recurrent spontaneous abortion compared to those who undergo voluntary termination of pregnancy (). Furthermore, whilst kisspeptin’s high diagnostic performance for identifying miscarriage is maintained in late-first trimester pregnancies (>8 weeks of gestation), that of β-human chorionic gonadotrophin (β-hCG) worsens (). Thus, the combination of both kisspeptin and β-hCG can be used to ensure high diagnostic accuracy at all gestations (AUCROC 0.92, 95% CI 0.89-0.95) (, , ). Kisspeptin has also been shown to reflect different types of miscarriage, with lower levels reported in complete (no retained products of conception) versus incomplete (retained products of conception) or missed (empty gestational sac or a foetal pole with no heartbeat) miscarriage (). Additionally, both kisspeptin and β-hCG levels decline with closer proximity to miscarriage confirmation, and therefore repeat measurements every 1-2 weeks could enable further risk-stratification of miscarriage risk in clinical practice ().
Table 2
| 2.1. KISSPEPTIN IN MISCARRIAGE | ||||||
| Author | Study Design | Cohort | Sample size | Kisspeptin measurement | Kisspeptin and βHCG values | AUCROC |
| Kavvasoglu (2011) () | Prospective Cohort | Pregnant women who delivered to term and miscarriage | Controls 20 Miscarriage 20 | Plasma at 7-18 wks GA KP-10 ELISA (Phoenix, Germany) | Kisspeptin pg/ml (median, min-max)* Controls: 5,783 (3,168–9,953) Miscarriage: 391 (152–951) | NA |
| Jayasena (2014) () | Prospective Cohort | Asymptomatic pregnant women | Controls 899 Miscarriage 50 | Plasma at 7-14 wks GA All KP forms In house RIA | Kisspeptin MoM (mean ± SD)* Controls: 1.06 ± 0.42 Miscarriage: 0.42 ± 0.39 β-hCG MoM (mean ± SD)* Controls: 1.08 ± 0.47 Miscarriage: 0.69 ± 1.35 | KP 0.899 βhCG 0.775 |
| Mumtaz (2017) () | Case-Control | Women with infertility undergoing ICSI treatment | Controls 28 Preclinical abortion 30 | Serum before treatment All KP forms ELISA (Kiss-1, China) | Kisspeptin ng/L (mean ± SEM)* Controls: 296.23 ± 12 Miscarriage: 215.11 ± 34.14 | |
| Sullivan-Pyke (2018) () | Case-Control | Symptomatic pregnant women | Controls 20 Miscarriage 20 | Serum at 6-10 wks GA KP-54 ELISA (Peninsula, USA) | Kisspeptin ng/ml (median, IQR)* Controls: 1.50 [0.55 – 3.72] Miscarriage: 0.20 [0.07 – 0.37] β-hCG mIU/mL (median, IQR)* Controls: 117202 [83975 – 148784] Miscarriage: 4739 [1858 – 8650] | KP 0.953 βhCG 0.994 |
| Yu (2019) () | Case-Control | Women with infertility undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment | Controls 28 Miscarriage 21 | Serum at (i) 12 days after blastocyst transfer and (ii) 4 days after pregnancy confirmation All KP forms ELISA (BlueGene, China) | Kisspeptin No significant difference between controls and miscarriage β-hCG* Significantly lower in miscarriage compared to controls | KP (i) 0.63, (ii) 0.76 βhCG (i) 0.76, (ii) 0.89 |
| Hu (2019) () | Case-Control | Women with infertility undergoing frozen thawed embryo transfer | Controls 47 Miscarriage 28 | Serum at (i) 14 days and (ii) 21 days after embryo transfer KP-54, KP-10 RIA (Phoenix, USA) | Kisspeptin pg/ml (mean ± SD) Controls: (i) 420.9 ± 201.5, (ii) 730.8 ± 274.4 Miscarriage: (i) 434.9 ± 215.1, (ii) 762.2 ± 210.3 β-hCG IU/L (mean ± SD)* Controls: (i) 1791 ± 1730, (ii) 21833 ± 16160 Miscarriage: (i) 777.8 ± 783.8, (ii) 6720 ± 4413 | KP 0.533 βhCG 0.777 |
| Abbara (2021) () | Case-Control | Asymptomatic and Symptomatic pregnant women | Controls 265 Miscarriage 95 | Plasma every 2 wks between 6-14 wks GA All KP forms In house RIA | Kisspeptin MoM (median, IQR)* Controls: 1.00 [0.63–1.31] Miscarriage: 0.21 [0.08–0.47] β-hCG MoM (median, IQR)* Controls: 1.00 [0.74–1.32] Miscarriage: 0.30 [0.08–0.64] | KP 0.874 βhCG 0.859 |
| Gorkem (2021) () | Case-Control | Asymptomatic and Symptomatic pregnant women | Controls 30 Miscarriage 30 Threatened miscarriage 30 | Serum at 7-9 wks GA KP-54 ELISA (Cloud-Clone Corp, USA) | Kisspeptin ng/ml (median, IQR) Controls: 86.7 [69.5-112.4] Miscarriage: 102.5 [79.5-123.5] Threatened miscarriage: 101.7 [85.4-139.4] | NA |
| Yuksel (2022) () | Prospective Case-Control | Symptomatic pregnant women with a pre-diagnosis of EP or miscarriage and healthy pregnancy | Controls 23 Miscarriage 23 | Serum at 5-6 wks GA KP form unclear ELISA (Mybiosource, USA) | Kisspeptin ng/ml (median, min-max)* Controls: 1.48 (1.29–1.80) Miscarriage: 0.11 (0.08–0.16) β-hCG mIU/ml (median, min-max)* Controls: 6151 (576–19,941) Miscarriage: 1771 (98–11,890) | NA |
| 2.2. KISSPEPTIN IN ECTOPIC PREGNANCY | ||||||
| Author | Study Design | Cohort | Sample size | Kisspeptin measurement | Kisspeptin and βHCG values | AUCROC |
| Romero-Ruiz (2019) () | Prospective Case-Control | Women with normal pregnancy that desired VTOP and EP | VTOP 108 EP 45 | Plasma at 4-20 wks GA All KP forms In house RIA | Kisspeptin* Significantly lower in EP compared to controls at all GA stages β-hCG* Significantly lower in EP compared to controls at all GA stages | KP 0.909 βhCG 0.947 |
| Abbara (2021) () | Case-Control | Asymptomatic and Symptomatic pregnant women | VIUP 42 EP 31 FPUL 82 PPUL 8 | Plasma every 2 wks between 6-14 wks GA All KP forms In house RIA | Kisspeptin pmol/L (mean + SEM) VIUP: 21.6 ± 41. EP: 20.1 ± 10.6 FPUL: 16.9 ± 12.0. PPUL: 21.5 ± 16.0 | NA |
| Yuksel (2022) () | Prospective Case-Control | Symptomatic pregnant women with a pre-diagnosis of EP or miscarriage and healthy pregnancy | Controls 23 EP 17 | Serum at 5-6 wks GA KP form unclear ELISA (Mybiosource, USA) | Kisspeptin ng/ml (median, min-max)* Controls: 1.48 (1.29–1.80). EP: 0.30 (0.22–0.39) β-hCG mIU/ml (median, min-max)* Controls: 6151 (576–19,941). EP: 1333 (94–11,600) | NA |
| 2.3. KISSPEPTIN IN HYPERTENSIVE DISORDERS OF PREGNANCY AND PRE-ECLAMPSIA | ||||||
| Author | Study Design | Cohort | Sample size | Kisspeptin measurement | Kisspeptin and βHCG values | AUCROC |
| Armstrong (2009) () | Retrospective Case-Control | Pregnant women with PE and uncomplicated pregnancies | Controls 317 PE 57 | Serum at 16-20 wks GA KP-54 In house ELISA | Kisspeptin pg/ml (median, IQR) * Controls: 1188 [494 – 2298] PE: 1109 [442 – 3903] | NA |
| Nijher (2010) () | Case-Control | Pregnant women with PE, PIH and uncomplicated pregnancies | Controls 78 PE 9 PIH 78 | Plasma at 27-40 wks GA KP-10, KP- 14, KP-54 In house RIA | Kisspeptin pmol/l (mean ± SE) Controls: 2878 ± 157 PIH: 2696 ± 299 PE: 3519± 357 | NA |
| Cetcovic (2012) () | Prospective Case-Control | Pregnant women with CH, PIH, PE and uncomplicated pregnancies | Controls 25 CH 22 PIH 18 PE 28 EPE 23 LPE 5 | Plasma at (i) 21-25 wks and (ii) 32-36 wks GA KP-10, KP- 14, KP-54 Validated RIA () | Kisspeptin nmol/l (mean ± SD) Controls: (i) 10.33 ± 2.65, (ii) 20.48 ± 7.60 PE: (i) 4.46 ± 3.73, (ii) 16.03 ± 10.09* CH: (i) 3.42 ± 1.04, (ii0 14.14 ± 10.44 * PIH: (i) 8.46 ± 6.24, (ii) 25.68 ± 9.2 | NA |
| Madazli (2012) () | Retrospective Case-Control | Pregnant women with PE and uncomplicated pregnancies | Controls 30 PE 31 | Plasma at 11-14 wks GA KP form unclear ELISA: (Phoenix, Germany) | Kisspeptin pmol/l (mean ± SD) * Controls: 1995 ± 375 PE:1554 ± 385 | KP 0.797 PlGF 0.831 |
| Adali (2012) () | Cross-Sectional | Pregnant women with PE (mPE GA 35.4 ± 0.83*, sPE GA 33.09± 0.75*) and uncomplicated pregnancies (GA 37.66± 0.39) | Controls 50 mPE 15 sPE 24 | Plasma at 33-37 wks GA KP-10, KP- 14, KP-54 ELISA (Phoenix, Germany) | Kisspeptin ng/ml (mean± SE) * Controls: 9.69 ± 1.35 mPE: 2.61 ± 0.40 sPE: 1.17 ± 0.24 | NA |
| Logie (2012) () | Cross-Sectional | Lean women with healthy pregnancy (controls) and obese women (BMI >40kg/m2) with uncomplicated pregnancy or PE | Controls 39 Obese (uncomplicated) 112 Obese PE 7 | Plasma at (i) 16, (ii) 28, (iii) 36 wks GA KP form unclear ELISA (Phoenix, Germany) | Kisspeptin at 16 wks pM (mean ± SEM) Lower in obese PE compared to uncomplicated obese and controls* | KP (i) 0·80, (ii) 0·56, (iii) 0·66) |
| Ziyaraa (2015) () | Prospective Case-Control | Pregnant women who completed GA 20 wks with mild and severe EPE and uncomplicated pregnancies Difference in BMI between the groups * | Controls 40 PE 60 Mild EPE 39 Severe EPE 21 | Plasma at (i) 20-27 wks and (ii) 28-40 wks KP-10 ELISA (Phoenix, Germany) | Kisspeptin ng/ml (mean± SEM) Controls: (i) 2.30 ± 0.51, (ii) 2.95 ± 1.82 Mild EPE: (i) 2.18 ± 0.76, (ii) 2.16 ± 0.48 * Severe EPE: (i) 1.59 ± 0.26 (1st) *, (ii) 2.39 ± 0.57 Mild vs Severe EPE:(i) *, (ii) (NS) | NA |
| Matjila (2016) () | Case-Control | Patients with (mean GA 32.95 ± 0.53 *) and without EPE (mean GA 38.03 ± 0.06 *) undergoing elective caesarean delivery | Controls 30 EPE 19 | Serum at 32-39wks GA KP-10 ELISA (Phoenix, Germany) | Kisspeptin ng/ml (mean± SEM) * Controls: 1.66 ± 0.59 ng/ml PE: 0.58 ± 0.39 | NA |
| Abbara (2022) () | Case-Control | Pregnant women with antenatal complications and uncomplicated pregnancies | Controls 265 HDP 32 PE 20 (EPE, LPE) PIH 12 | Plasma at (i) <9, (ii) 9-13, (iii) 14-27, (iv) 28-40 wks GA KP-10, KP-14, KP-54 In-house RIA | Kisspeptin pmol/L (mean± SEM) HDP Vs Controls No significant difference in (i), (ii), (iii) Higher in HDP than controls (iv) * LPE Vs Controls No significant difference in (i), (iii), (iv) Higher in LPE than controls(ii) * EPE Vs Control No significant difference in (i), (iii), (iv) Lower in EPE than controls(ii) * Kisspeptin MoM (median) * Higher in HDP than control pregnancies | NA |
| 2.4. KISSPEPTIN IN GESTATIONAL DIABETES MELLITUS | ||||||
| Author | Study Design | Cohort | Sample size | Kisspeptin measurement | Kisspeptin and βHCG values | AUCROC |
| Cetcovic (2012) () | Prospective Case Control | Pregnant with and without a diagnosis of GDM | Controls 25 GDM 20 | Plasma at (i) 21-25 and (ii) 32-36 wks GA KP-10, KP- 14, KP-54 Validated RIA () | Kisspeptin nmol/l (Mean ± SD) * Controls: (i) 10.33 ± 2.65; (ii) 20.48 ± 7.60 GDM: (i) 4.51 ± 3.18*; (ii) 11.643 ± 7.6 * | NA |
| Bowe (2019) () | Case-Control | Pregnant women with and without a diagnosis of GDM | Controls 62 GDM 26 | Plasma at 26-34 wks GA KP form unclear ELISA (Phoenix, Germany) | Kisspeptin pmol/l (Mean ± SEM) * Controls: 1270.9 ± 67.1 GDM: 889.9 ± 96.6 | NA |
| Arslan (2020) () | Cross-Sectional | Pregnant women with and without a diagnosis of GDM | Controls 82 GDM 76 | Serum at 24-28 wks GA KP-54 ELISA (Human KISS-54 kits-Biotek Synergy HT) | Kisspeptin pmol/l (Mean ± SD) Controls: 161.3 ± 78.2 GDM: 187.6 ± 132.3 (NS) | NA |
| Abbara (2022) () | Case-Control | Pregnant women with antenatal complications and uncomplicated pregnancies | Controls 265 GDM 35 | Plasma at <9, 9-13, 14-27, 28-40 wks GA KP-10, KP-14, KP-54 In-house RIA | Kisspeptin nmol/l (Median [IQR]) No difference between control and GDM pregnancies in all trimesters Kisspeptin MoM (median)* GDM lower than control pregnancies | NA |
| 2.5. KISSPEPTIN IN PRETERM BIRTH | ||||||
| Author | Study Design | Cohort | Sample size | Kisspeptin measurement | Kisspeptin and βHCG values | AUCROC |
| Torricelli (2008) () | Observational | Pregnant women delivering at term (GA 38-40 wks, by SVD or ECS) and preterm (GA 32-34 wks) | Term SVD 15 Term ECS 15 Preterm 10 | Plasma at delivery All KP forms ELISA (Phoenix, Germany) | Kisspeptin ng/ml (mean ± SEM) Term SVD: 4.332 ± 2.10 Term ECS: 4.021 ± 1.67 Preterm: 4.781 ± 1.51 | NA |
| Abbara (2022) () | Case-Control | Pregnant women with uncomplicated pregnancies and preterm birth (GA 24-37wks) | Controls 265 Preterm 11 | Plasma at (i) <9, (ii) 9-13, (iii) 14-27, (iv) 28-40 wks GA KP-10, KP-14, KP-54 In-house RIA | Kisspeptin* Adjusted KP higher in PTB than controls in all trimesters Unadjusted KP levels in (ii) higher in PTB than controls | NA |
| 2.6. KISSPEPTIN IN FOETAL GROWTH RESTRICTION | ||||||
| Author | Study Design | Cohort | Sample size | Kisspeptin measurement | Kisspeptin and βHCG values | AUCROC |
| Smets (2008) () | Case-Control | Pregnant women at risk of PE, IUGR and SGA Birth weight (g) Controls 3623 ± 334 SGA 2665 ± 369 | Controls 31 SGA 31 | Plasma at 8-14 wks GA KP-10 Ab RIA (Phoenix, USA) | Kisspeptin pmol/L (mean ± SD)* Controls: 2035 ± 1260 IUGR: 1376 ± 1317 β-hCG pg/ml (mean ± SD) Controls: 62 ± 56 IUGR: 61 ± 55 | NA |
| Armstrong (2009) () | Retrospective case-control | Pregnant women with IUGR and uncomplicated pregnancies Birth weight (g) Controls 3496 ± 36.6 IUGR 2307 ± 17.4 | Controls 317 IUGR 118 | Serum at 16-20 wks GA KP-54 In house ELISA | Kisspeptin pg/ml (median, IQR)* Controls: 1188 [494 – 2298] IUGR: 1164 [442 – 3903) β-hCG MoM (mean ± SEM) Controls: 0.97 (0.69) [0.20 – 3.19] IUGR: 0.91 (0.74) [0.50 – 3.6] | NA |
| Khalil (2018) () | Case-Control | Pregnant women with PE&IGUR, IUGR and uncomplicated pregnancies that underwent ECS Birth weight (g) Controls 3300 ± 110 PE&IUGR 2180 ± 220 IUGR 2280 ± 350 | Controls 10 PE&IUGR 10 IUGR 10 | Serum at 34-38wks GA KP-10 ELISA (Life span Biosciences) | Kisspeptin ng/ml (mean ± SD)* Controls: 2900 ± 600 PE&IUGR: 1640 ± 400 IUGR: 1630 ± 300 | NA |
| Abbara (2022) () | Case-Control | Pregnant women with antenatal complications and uncomplicated pregnancies | Controls 265 FGR 17 | Plasma at (i) <9, (ii) 9-13, (iii) 14-27, (iv) 28-40 wks GA KP-10, KP-14, KP-54 In-house RIA | Kisspeptin* Adjusted KP lower in FGR than controls in all trimesters Unadjusted KP levels in (ii) and (iv) lower in FGR than controls | NA |
| 2.7. KISSPEPTIN IN GESTATIONAL TROPHOBLASTIC DISEASE | ||||||
| Author | Study Design | Cohort | Sample size | Kisspeptin measurement | Kisspeptin and βHCG values | AUCROC |
| Dhillo (2006) () | Case-Control | Healthy pregnant women and women diagnosed with invasive mole undergoing chemotherapy | Controls 26 Invasive mole 11 | Plasma at (i) 10 wks GA, (ii) 38 wks GA and (iii) 15 days postpartum and (iv) pre and post chemotherapy for invasive mole KP-10, KP-14, KP-54 In-house RIA | Kisspeptin pmol/l (mean ± SE)* Controls 10 wks: 803 ± 13 38 wks: 2,483 ± 302 15 days postpartum: <2 Invasive Mole Pre-chemo: 1,363 ± 1,076 pmol* Post-chemo: <2 β-hCG U/l (mean ± SE) * Controls 10 wks: 72,053 ± 10,936 38 wks: 28,818 ± 11,348 Invasive Mole Pre-chemo: 227,191 ± 152,354 Post-chemo: <2 | NA |
Circulating Kisspeptin Levels in pregnancy complications.
BMI, body mass index; CH, chronic pre-existing hypertension; ECS, elective caesarean section; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; EP, ectopic pregnancy; EPE, early onset pre-eclampsia; FGR, foetal growth retardation; FPUL, failed (negative pregnancy test 2 weeks from follow-up) pregnancy of unknown location; GA, gestational age; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; GTD, gestational trophoblastic disease; HDP, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IQR, interquartile range; IUGR, intrauterine growth retardation; IVF, in vitro fertilisation; KP, kisspeptin; LPE, late onset pre-eclampsia; mPE, mild pre-eclampsia; MoM, multiple of the median; NA, not applicable; NS, no statistically significant difference; PE, pre-eclampsia; PIH, pregnancy induced hypertension; PlGF, placenta growth factor; PPUL, persistent (more than three static serial βhCG levels) pregnancy of unknown location; RIA, radioimmunoassay; SD, standard deviation; SEM, standard error of the mean; SGA, small for gestational age baby; sPE, severe pre-eclampsia; SVD; spontaneous vaginal delivery; VIUP, intrauterine pregnancy viable at 12 weeks’ gestation; VTOP, voluntary termination of pregnancy; wks, weeks.
*p-values indicate statistically significant difference.
Studies involving women with infertility who undergo assisted reproductive techniques (in vitro fertilisation, intracytoplasmic sperm insemination (ICSI) or frozen thawed embryo transfer) have found reduced β-hCG levels in miscarriage compared to controls, but no difference in kisspeptin levels (, ). These findings may be due to the very early gestations at which kisspeptin levels were assessed (2-3 weeks following, or even before, pregnancy confirmation) (, ). Indeed, kisspeptin may not be expressed in the placenta at high levels prior to 6 weeks of gestation, suggesting that β-hCG levels may be more useful at these very early gestations ().
2. Kisspeptin in Ectopic Pregnancy
Ectopic pregnancy (EP) affects 2% of pregnancies and occurs when a fertilised ovum implants and develops outside the uterine cavity, most commonly within the fallopian tube (). EP can result in tubal rupture and accounts for 9-13% of all pregnancy-related deaths in developed countries and can compromise a woman’s future fertility (). EP is currently diagnosed by serial β-hCG measurements in combination with ultrasound, although laparoscopy is often required to provide a definitive diagnosis (). The sensitivity and specificity of these tests significantly decrease in the case of pregnancies of unknown location (PUL) as false positive or negative diagnoses may occur. This is important as an incorrect diagnosis may lead to termination of a healthy pregnancy (). Accordingly, different biomarkers have been investigated in an attempt to improve the diagnostic accuracy of EP, including kisspeptin.
Some studies have found that kisspeptin levels in EP are lower than in healthy pregnancy but higher than in miscarriage (, ). However, another study demonstrated that kisspeptin levels are not significantly altered between women with viable intrauterine pregnancies (VIUPs) and those with either EP or failing or persistent PUL, after adjusting for confounding variables () (Table 2.2). Current evidence remains limited, and larger studies are required to determine kisspeptin’s performance as a diagnostic marker in EP at early gestations (<6 weeks).
3. Kisspeptin in Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and Pre-Eclampsia
Hypertensive disorders affect 5% of all pregnancies () and include pre-existing chronic hypertension (CH), pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) and pre-eclampsia (PE). PIH is defined as new onset hypertension (BP ≥140/90mmHg) occurring after 20 weeks of gestation, PE is PIH with proteinuria (urine >3g/24 hours) or significant end-organ dysfunction, and severe PE is the presence of at least one of: hypertension (BP≥160/110 mmHg), visual disturbance, chest pain, dyspnoea, pulmonary oedema, seizures, or neonatal distress (). PE is further classified, according to the onset of clinical features, into early-onset PE (EPE <34 weeks of gestation) and late-onset PE (LPE ≥34 weeks of gestation). EPE is associated with impaired trophoblast invasion, defective spiral artery remodelling and adverse perinatal complications including IUGR (). LPE occurs due to hypoxic stress and impaired perfusion but is less likely to compromise foetal growth (, ). Currently, PE diagnosis is based on early pregnancy risk factor screening, uterine artery Doppler velocimetry and biomarkers such as PPAP-A or placental growth factor (PlGF) (). Kisspeptin has been implicated in the pathogenesis of PE through reduced angiogenesis, decreased cytotrophoblast invasion and increased trophoblast apoptosis, and thus could have potential in predicting PE (–).
Levels of circulating kisspeptin in HDP vary in the literature, and largely differ according to HDP subtype, severity, and onset (Table 2.3). Most of the studies report reduced circulating kisspeptin levels in PE compared to normotensive pregnant controls (, , –, ) and therefore kisspeptin is considered to reflect placental dysfunction. However, expression of KISS-1, which inhibits trophoblast invasion and results in defective transformation of the spiral arteries, is increased in the placentae of PE pregnancies, thus supporting its role in the pathophysiology of PE (–, , 66) (Table 1). Nonetheless, there are also some reports of decreased KISS-1 expression in PE placentae (, ) (Table 1). Furthermore, evidence suggests that circulating kisspeptin levels decline as the severity of PE increases, which could also reflect reduced placental mass in more severe disease. Indeed, both circulating kisspeptin levels and placental mass is reduced in EPE compared to LPE (, , 67). Additionally, pregnant women with pre-existing hypertension and PE, states associated with a higher burden of disease, have reduced kisspeptin levels compared to PIH ().
Whilst most studies demonstrate reduced kisspeptin levels in PE, a recent study found that kisspeptin levels are increased in HDP during the third trimester of pregnancy (Table 2.3). However, there was no association between circulating kisspeptin levels and severity of PET (). It is likely that complexity in the categorisation, severity, and onset of PET, and the need for correction for possible confounders such as BMI and gestational age, could explain differences between kisspeptin levels observed in the current studies. Larger observational studies that are carefully designed to address these and look at each PET-subset throughout pregnancy would therefore be valuable in resolving these inconsistencies.
4. Kisspeptin in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
During pregnancy a physiological rise in maternal insulin resistance provides glucose to the developing foetus (68, 69). This insulin resistance leads to maternal pancreatic β-cell adaptation and increased insulin secretion. Failure of these changes results in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), which affects up to 20% of pregnancies worldwide (70).
Kisspeptin receptors are expressed in pancreatic β-cells (71) and have been implicated in β-cell adaptation during pregnancy. Exogenous kisspeptin administration has variable physiological effects on the glucose-dependent regulation of pancreatic beta-cells. For instance, KISS-1 peptide (KP-145) (71), KP-13 (72), KP-10 (72–74) potentiates glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) in animal and human islets in-vitro. KP-54 increases GSIS in healthy men following an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT), which induces high glucose levels (75). On the other hand, Vikam and colleagues have found that KP-13 and KP-54 drives dose-dependent inhibitory effects on insulin secretion in mouse islets in the presence of lower glucose concentrations (2.8-11.1 mmol/l), compared to controls, which is not observed at higher glucose concentrations (76). Furthermore, chronic administration of KP-10 in non-pregnant mice enhances GSIS and improves glucose tolerance (). Interestingly, hyperlipidaemia, impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and weight gain develops in Kiss-1r-null female mice exclusively, thus suggesting sexual dimorphism in kisspeptin’s effects on metabolism and glucose homeostasis (77).
In late gestation murine pregnancy, β-cell specific Kiss-1r-knockout models and pharmacological inhibition of Kiss-1r leads to reduced GSIS and development of IGT, which is not observed in non-pregnant states or wild-type controls (). This supports a role for β-cell kisspeptin signalling in the regulation of glucose homeostasis during pregnancy. Loss of kisspeptin signalling in the ß-cell-specific Kiss-1r-knockout models also attenuates the increased ß-cell proliferation normally seen during murine pregnancy when assessed with bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) labelling. Nonetheless, the levels are not reduced to non-pregnant levels, suggesting contribution of other signals in pancreatic β-cell proliferation during pregnancy (, 78).
In human pregnancies with GDM, placental KISS-1 and KISS-1R expression is elevated in the third trimester (, ) (Table 1), whereas circulating kisspeptin levels have been either lower (, ) or not significantly altered (, ) (Table 2.4). Finally, Bowe and colleagues have demonstrated a positive correlation between third trimester kisspeptin levels and oral glucose–stimulated insulin levels at 60 minutes (r2 = 0.18; P < 0.0001) and AUC serum insulin over the OGTT (r2 = 0.13; P=0.0013) in women with GDM ().
5. Kisspeptin in Pre-Term Birth
Pre-term birth (PTB) is defined as delivery prior to 37 weeks of gestation and affects 11% of pregnancies (79, 80). Kisspeptin has been proposed to initiate labour through increased oxytocin neuronal firing rate in pregnant rats and thus may play a potential role in PTB (81). Gestation adjusted kisspeptin levels are higher in PTB-affected pregnancies than in control pregnancies during the late-first trimester, with the adjusted odds of PTB being increased by 20% (95% CI, 1-42%) for every 1 nmol/L increase in plasma kisspeptin () (Table 2.5). Furthermore, KISS-1 mRNA expression is higher in preterm placentae than in term placentae delivered vaginally or by Caesarean section thus indicating that increased kisspeptin expression could be involved in the induction of labour () (Table 1)W. However, no alteration in circulating kisspeptin levels have been reported to date during the third trimester between healthy pregnancy and PTB and thus more data is needed to elucidate whether there are changes in kisspeptin levels preceding and around the time of spontaneous labour (, ).
6. Kisspeptin in Foetal Growth Restriction
Foetal growth restriction (FGR) encompasses both intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR, foetal weight <10th centile for gestational age with abnormal umbilical artery doppler results) and small for gestation age (SGA, delivery weight <10th percentile for gestational age) (82, 83). FGR is thought to arise from abnormal trophoblast invasion and spiral artery remodelling that limits oxygen supply to the placenta (84, 85). The resulting ischemic injury generates reactive oxygen species which lead to apoptosis and restriction of placental and foetal growth (84, 85). To date, four studies have demonstrated significantly reduced kisspeptin levels in FGR versus healthy pregnancy in all three trimesters (–) (Table 2.6). Thus, low circulating kisspeptin levels could reflect low placental mass in pregnancies affected by FGR.
7. Kisspeptin in Gestational Trophoblastic Disease
Gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) is characterised by an abnormal proliferation of placental tissue and comprises of choriocarcinoma, invasive mole, placental site trophoblastic tumour and epithelioid trophoblastic tumour (86). Molar pregnancy is a benign form of GTD, whereas choriocarcinomas are more aggressive, however both exhibit high β-hCG levels and respond well to chemotherapy (87). Serum β-hCG measurement aids with GTD diagnosis, staging and prognostication before and after chemotherapy (88).
KISS-1 and KISS-1R expression is significantly lower in malignant choriocarcinoma cells compared to molar and healthy pregnancies (, ) (Table 1). Conversely, circulating kisspeptin levels are elevated in malignant GTD compared to healthy pregnancies but significantly decline following chemotherapy () (Table 2.7). The increased circulating kisspeptin levels could reflect an increased malignant trophoblast mass rather than an elevation in cellular KISS-1 expression (89). Thus, kisspeptin levels can be altered in choriocarcinomas and other GTDs, which is interesting when considering the original identification of KISS-1 as an anti-metastatic gene.
Conclusion
Kisspeptin levels are markedly reduced in miscarriage; and whilst the performance of kisspeptin levels to identify women at high risk of miscarriage is maintained throughout the first trimester, that of β-hCG falls during the latter part of the first trimester. Nevertheless, kisspeptin levels are only mildly elevated at early gestations (< 6 weeks) and therefore can be difficult to detect using current collection and assay methods. Thus, measuring kisspeptin in combination with β-hCG levels could potentially overcome this deficiency at early gestations. Due to the current difficulty in miscarriage diagnosis and the lack of available biomarkers, the high performance of plasma kisspeptin suggests that it has significant potential for further development in this context. Given that kisspeptin has been proposed as a biomarker of healthy placentation, it could potentially be used to recognise late pregnancy complications characterised by abnormal placentation during the first trimester. Regarding HDP, most studies have suggested lower circulating kisspeptin levels but increased placental kisspeptin expression. Kisspeptin levels in pregnancy complications such as PE are confounded by factors such as BMI, disease severity, time of onset, and concomitant FGR, and thus could limit the use of kisspeptin diagnostically.
Overall, current evidence suggests that circulating kisspeptin levels are consistently reduced in miscarriage, EP, FGR, GDM, and increased in PTB and GTD. Larger datasets with adequately sized control cohorts that accurately adjust for gestation, BMI, ethnicity, detailed disease severity phenotype and onset are needed to enable more precise characterisation of the utility of kisspeptin levels in these settings. In summary, circulating kisspeptin is a promising biomarker for early pregnancy loss and further research is needed to assess its potential in other pregnancy complications.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR), the NIHR/Wellcome Trust Imperial Clinical Research Facility, and the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre. The Section of Endocrinology and Investigative Medicine was funded by grants from the Medical Research Council (MRC), Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), NIHR and was supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Funding Scheme. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the MRC, BBSRC, the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health. BP is supported by an MRC Clinical Training Research Fellowship (Grant Ref: MR/W024144/1). AC is supported by the National Health Service. WD is supported by an NIHR Senior Investigator Award (NIHR RP-2014-05-001). AA is supported by an NIHR Clinician Scientist Award (No. CS-2018-18-ST2-002).
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Author contributions
BP, JT wrote the manuscript, designed the figures and tables. AA, WSD, ANC reviewed and edited the manuscript and are the corresponding authors. All authors have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work and approved the manuscript prior to its submission.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AbbaraAClarkeSADhilloWS. Clinical Potential of Kisspeptin in Reproductive Health. Trends Mol Med (2021) 27(8):807–23. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2021.05.008
2
De RouxNGeninECarelJCMatsudaFChaussainJLMilgromE. Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism Due to Loss of Function of the KiSS1-Derived Peptide Receptor GPR54. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2003) 100(19):10972–976. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1834399100
3
SeminaraSBMessagerSChatzidakiEEThresherRRAciernoJSJShagouryJKet al. The GPR54 Gene as a Regulator of Puberty. N Engl J Med (2003) 349(17):1614–27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa035322
4
SavarisRF. Kisspeptin as a Biomarker for Miscarriage: Let’s Wait! Fertil Steril (2018) 109:67. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.014
5
KotaniMDetheuxMVandenbogaerdeACommuniDVanderwindenJMLe PoulEet al. The Metastasis Suppressor Gene KiSS-1 Encodes Kisspeptins, the Natural Ligands of the Orphan G Protein-Coupled Receptor Gpr54. J Biol Chem (2001) 276(37):34631–636. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M104847200
6
HorikoshiYMatsumotoHTakatsuYOhtakiTKitadaCUsukiSet al. Dramatic Elevation of Plasma Metastin Concentrations in Human Pregnancy: Metastin as a Novel Placenta-Derived Hormone in Humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2003) 88(2):914–19. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-021235
7
DhilloWSSavagePMurphyKGChaudhriOBPattersonMNijherGMet al. Plasma Kisspeptin is Raised in Patients With Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia and Falls During Treatment. Am J Physiol - Endocrinol Metab (2006) 291(5):878–84. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00555.2005
8
LeeJHMieleMEHicksDJPhillipsKKTrentJMWeissmanBEet al. KiSS-1, a Novel Human Malignant Melanoma Metastasis-Suppressor Gene. J Natl Cancer Inst (1996) 88(23):1731–37. doi: 10.1093/jnci/88.23.1731
9
WestAVojtaPJWelchDRWeissmanBE. Chromosome Localization and Genomic Structure of the KiSS-1 Metastasis Suppressor Gene (KISS1). Genomics (1998) 54(1):145–8. doi: 10.1006/geno.1998.5566
10
OhtakiTShintaniYHondaSMatsumotoHHoriAKanehashiKet al. Metastasis Suppressor Gene KiSS-1 Encodes Peptide Ligand of a G-Protein-Coupled Receptor. Nat (2001) 411(6837):613–7. doi: 10.1038/35079135
11
ParkDWLeeSKHongSRHanARKwak-KimJYangKM. Expression of Kisspeptin and its Receptor GPR54 in the First Trimester Trophoblast of Women With Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. Am J Reprod Immunol (2012) 67(2):132–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2011.01073.x
12
HuKLChangHMZhaoHCYuYLiRQiaoJ. Potential Roles for the Kisspeptin/Kisspeptin Receptor System in Implantation and Placentation. Hum Reprod Update (2019) 25(3):326–43. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmy046
13
FrancisVAAberaABMatjilaMMillarRPKatzAA. Kisspeptin Regulation of Genes Involved in Cell Invasion and Angiogenesis in First Trimester Human Trophoblast Cells. PLoS One (2014) 9(6):1–10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099680
14
BilbanMGhaffari-TabriziNHintermannEBauerSMolzerSZorattiCet al. Kisspeptin-10, a KiSS-1/Metastin-Derived Decapeptide, is a Physiological Invasion Inhibitor of Primary Human Trophoblasts. J Cell Sci (2004) 117(8):1319–28. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00971
15
RoseweirAKKatzAAMillarRP. Kisspeptin-10 Inhibits Cell Migration In Vitro via a Receptor-GSK3 Beta-FAK Feedback Loop in HTR8SVneo Cells. Placenta (2012) 33(5):408–15. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2012.02.001
16
MaynardSEAnanth KarumanchiS. Angiogenic Factors and Preeclampsia. Semin. Nephrol (2010) 31(1):33–46. doi: 10.1016/S2210-7789(10)60068-2
17
ThadhaniRMutterWPWolfMLevineRJTaylorRNSukhatmeVPet al. First Trimester Placental Growth Factor and Soluble Fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 1 and Risk for Preeclampsia. J Clin Endocr Metab (2004) 89(2):770–75. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-031244
18
LevineRJMaynardSEQianCLimK-HEnglandLJYuKFet al. Circulating Angiogenic Factors and the Risk of Preeclampsia. N Engl J Med (2004) 12:672–83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031884
19
WilliamsZ. Inducing Tolerance to Pregnancy. N Engl J Med (2012) 367(12):1159–61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcibr1207279
20
AbbaraAAl-MemarMPhylactouMKyriacouCEngPCNadirRet al. Performance of Plasma Kisspeptin as a Biomarker for Miscarriage Improves With Gestational Age During the First Trimester. Fertil Steril (2021) 116(3):809–19. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.04.031
21
KavvasogluSOzkanZSKumbakBSimsekMIlhanN. Association of Kisspeptin-10 Levels With Abortus Imminens: A Preliminary Study. Arch Gynecol Obstet (2012) 285(3):649–53. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-2061-0
22
JayasenaCNAbbaraAIzzi-EngbeayaCComninosANHarveyRAGonzalez MaffeJet al. Reduced Levels of Plasma Kisspeptin During the Antenatal Booking Visit are Associated With Increased Risk of Miscarriage. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2014) 99(12):E2652–60. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-1953
23
MumtazAKhalidAJamilZFatimaSSArifSRehmanR. Kisspeptin: A Potential Factor for Unexplained Infertility and Impaired Embryo Implantation. Int J Fertil Steril (2017) 11(2):99–104. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2017.4957
24
Sullivan-PykeCHaisenlederDJSenapatiSNicolaisOEisenbergESammelMDet al. Kisspeptin as a New Serum Biomarker to Discriminate Miscarriage From Viable Intrauterine Pregnancy. Fertil Steril (2018) 109(1):137–41. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.09.029
25
YukselSKetenci GencerF. Serum Kisspeptin, to Discriminate Between Ectopic Pregnancy, Miscarriage and First Trimester Pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore) (2022) 0(0):1–5. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2028747
26
Romero-RuizAAvendañoMSDominguezFLozoyaTMolina-AbrilHSangiao-AlvarellosSet al. Deregulation of miR-324/KISS1/kisspeptin in Early Ectopic Pregnancy: Mechanistic Findings With Clinical and Diagnostic Implications. Am J Obstet Gynecol (2019) 220(5):e1–e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.228
27
TorricelliMGalleriLVoltoliniCBiliottiGFlorioPDe BonisMet al. Changes of Placental Kiss-1 mRNA Expression and Maternal/Cord Kisspeptin Levels at Preterm Delivery. Reprod Sci (2008) 15(8):779–84. doi: 10.1177/1933719108322442
28
AbbaraAAl-MemarMPhylactouMDanielsEPatelBEngPCet al. Changes in Circulating Kisspeptin Levels During Each Trimester in Women With Antenatal Complications. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2022) 107(1):E71–83. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab617
29
ArmstrongRAReynoldsRMLeaskRShearingCHCalderAARileySC. Decreased Serum Levels of Kisspeptin in Early Pregnancy are Associated With Intra-Uterine Growth Restriction and Pre-Eclampsia. Prenat Diagn (2009) 29(10):982–5. doi: 10.1002/pd.2328
30
SmetsEMLDeurlooKLGoATJIVan VugtJMGBlankensteinMAOudejansCBM. Decreased Plasma Levels of Metastin in Early Pregnancy are Associated With Small for Gestational Age Neonates. Prenat Diagn (2008) 28(4):299–303. doi: 10.1002/pd.1969
31
. AbulfadleKAKhalilSSElnagarWM. Serum Kisspeptin-10 Levels in Pregnant Women Complicated With Intrauterine Growth Restriction With or Without Preeclampsia. Med J Cairo Univ (2018) 86(6):1975–82. doi: 10.21608/mjcu.2018.56929
32
MatjilaMMillarRvan der SpuyZKatzA. Elevated Placental Expression at the Maternal-Fetal Interface But Diminished Maternal Circulatory Kisspeptin in Preeclamptic Pregnancies. Pregnancy Hypertens (2016) 6(1):79–87. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2015.11.001
33
ZhangHLongQLingLGaoALiHLinQ. Elevated Expression of KiSS-1 in Placenta of Preeclampsia and its Effect on Trophoblast. Reprod Biol (2011) 11(2):99–115. doi: 10.1016/S1642-431X(12)60048-5
34
Vazquez-AlanizFGalaviz-HernandezCMarchatLASalas-PachecoJMChairez-HernandezIGuijarro-BustillosJJet al. Comparative Expression Profiles for KiSS-1 and REN Genes in Preeclamptic and Healthy Placental Tissues. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol (2011) 159(1):67–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.07.019
35
KapustinRVDrobintsevaAOAlekseenkovaENOnopriychukARArzhanovaONPolyakovaVOet al. Placental Protein Expression of Kisspeptin-1 (KISS1) and the Kisspeptin-1 Receptor (KISS1R) in Pregnancy Complicated by Diabetes Mellitus or Preeclampsia. Arch Gynecol Obstet (2020) 301(2):437–45. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05408-1
36
QiaoCWangCZhaoJLiuCShangT. Elevated Expression of KiSS-1 in Placenta of Chinese Women With Early-Onset Preeclampsia. PLoS One (2012) 7(11):1–9. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048937
37
CartwrightJEWilliamsPJ. Altered Placental Expression of Kisspeptin and its Receptor in Pre-Eclampsia. J Endocrinol (2012) 214(1):79–85. doi: 10.1530/JOE-12-0091
38
QiaoCWangCShangTLinQ. Clinical Significance of KiSS-1 and Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Expression in Trophoblasts of Women With Preeclampsia and Their Relation to Perinatal Outcome of Neonates. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi (2005) 40(9):585–90.
39
MadazliRBulutBTutenAAydinBDemirayakGKucurM. First-Trimester Maternal Serum Metastin, Placental Growth Factor and Chitotriosidase Levels in Pre-Eclampsia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol (2012) 164(2):146–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.06.016
40
ĆetkovićAMiljicDLjubićAPattersonMGhateiMStamenkovÃJet al. Plasma Kisspeptin Levels in Pregnancies With Diabetes and Hypertensive Disease as a Potential Marker of Placental Dysfunction and Adverse Perinatal Outcome. Endocr Res (2012) 37(2):78–88. doi: 10.3109/07435800.2011.639319
41
LogieJJDenisonFCRileySCRamaeshTForbesSNormanJEet al. Evaluation of Kisspeptin Levels in Obese Pregnancy as a Biomarker for Pre-Eclampsia. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) (2012) 76(6):887–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04317.x
42
ZiyaraaMAHamdanFBMousaLR. Correlation of Kisspeptin-10 Level and Fetal Well-Being in Preeclamptic Patients. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol (2016) 55(6):840–6. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2015.10.028
43
AdaliEKurdogluZKurdogluMKamaciMKolusariAYildizhanR. Metastin Levels in Pregnancies Complicated by Pre-Eclampsia and Their Relation With Disease Severity. J Matern Neonatal Med (2012) 25(12):2671–5. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.708369
44
NijherGMKChaudhriOBRamachandranRMurphyKGZac-VargheseSEKFowlerAet al. The Effects of Kisspeptin-54 on Blood Pressure in Humans and Plasma Kisspeptin Concentrations in Hypertensive Diseases of Pregnancy. Br J Clin Pharmacol (2010) 70(5):674–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03746.x
45
LoeglJNussbaumerECviticSHuppertzBDesoyeGHidenU. GDM Alters Paracrine Regulation of Feto-Placental Angiogenesis via the Trophoblast. Lab Investig (2017) 97:409–18. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2016.149
46
ArslanEGorkemUTogrulC. Is There An Association Between Kisspeptin Levels And Gestational Diabetes Mellitus? Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med (2020) 26(3):179–83. doi: 10.21613/GORM.2019.946
47
BoweJEHillTGHuntKFSmithLIFSimpsonSJSAmielSAet al. A Role for Placental Kisspeptin in β Cell Adaptation to Pregnancy. JCI Insight (2019) 4(20):1–14. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.124540
48
JanneauJ-LMaldonado-EstradaJTachdjianGMiranIMottéNSaulnierPet al. Transcriptional Expression of Genes Involved in Cell Invasion and Migration by Normal and Tumoral Trophoblast Cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2002) 87(11):5336–9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-021093
49
RamachandranRPattersonMMurphyKGDhilloWSPatelSKazarianAet al. Preanalytical Factors Affecting RIA Measurement of Plasma Kisspeptin. Clin Chem (2008) 54:615–17. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2007.093005
50
QuenbySGallosIDDhillon-SmithRKPodesekMStephensonMDFisherJet al. Miscarriage Matters: The Epidemiological, Physical, Psychological, and Economic Costs of Early Pregnancy Loss. Lancet (2021) 397:1658–67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00682-6
51
ColakEOzcimenEEErinançOHTohmaYACeranMU. Is Placental KISS-1 Expression Associated With First Trimester Abortion Spontaneous? Obstet Gynecol Sci (2020) 63(4):490–96. doi: 10.5468/ogs.19242
52
FarrenJJalmbrantMFalconieriNMitchell-JonesNBobdiwalaSAl-MemarMet al. Posttraumatic Stress, Anxiety and Depression Following Miscarriage and Ectopic Pregnancy: A Multicenter, Prospective, Cohort Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol (2020) 222(4):367.e1–367.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.10.102
53
YuHLiuJGuoHChenCHanYCuiY. Prognostic Value of Repeated Serum Kisspeptin Measurements in Early First Trimester Pregnancy: A Preliminary Study. Reprod BioMed Online (2019) 38(3):465–71. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.11.014
54
GorkemUKanOBostanciMOTaskiranDInalHA. Kisspeptin and Hematologic Parameters as Predictive Biomarkers for First-Trimester Abortions. Medeni Med J (2021) 36(2):98–105. doi: 10.5222/MMJ.2021.32549
55
HuKLZhangYYangZZhaoHXuHYuYet al. Predictive Value of Serum Kisspeptin Concentration at 14 and 21 Days After Frozen–Thawed Embryo Transfer. Reprod BioMed Online (2019) 39(1):161–7. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.03.202
56
PetriniASpandorferS. Recurrent Ectopic Pregnancy: Current Perspectives. Int J Women’s Health (2020) 12:597–600 . doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S223909
57
GoyauxNLekeRKeitaNThonneauP. Ectopic Pregnancy in African Developing Countries. Acta Obstetricia Gynecol Scand (2003) 82:305–12. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.00175.x
58
TaranFAKaganKOHübnerMHoopmannMWallwienerDBruckerS. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Ectopic Pregnancy. Dtsch Arztebl Int (2015) 112(41):693–704. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0693
59
DoubiletPMBensonCBBourneTBlaivasM. Diagnostic Criteria for Nonviable Pregnancy Early in the First Trimester. N Engl J Med (2013) 369(15):1443–51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1302417
60
AbalosECuestaCGrossoALChouDSayL. Global and Regional Estimates of Preeclampsia and Eclampsia: A Systematic Review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol (2013) 170(1):1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.005
61
MageeLABrownMAHallDRGupteSHennessyAKarumanchiSAet al. The 2021 International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy Classification, Diagnosis & Management Recommendations for International Practice. Pregnancy Hypertens (2022) 27:148–69. doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2021.09.008
62
BischofPMeisserACampanaA. Paracrine and Autocrine Regulators of Trophoblast Invasion— A Review. Placenta (2000) 21(SUPPL.1):S55–60. doi: 10.1053/plac.2000.0521
63
StaffAC. The Two-Stage Placental Model of Preeclampsia: An Update. J Reprod Immunol (2019) 134–135(March):1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2019.07.004
64
NelsonDBZiadieMSMcIntireDDRogersBBLevenoKJ. Placental Pathology Suggesting That Preeclampsia is More Than One Disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol (2014) 210(1):66.e1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.010
65
KucurMMadazliRBulutBTutenAAydinB. First-Trimester Maternal Serum Metastin , Placental Growth Factor and Chitotriosidase Levels in Pre-Eclampsia. Eur J Obstetrics Gynecol Reprod Biol (2012) 164(2012):146–9. doi: 10.1016/J.EJOGRB.2012.06.016
66
GomesVCLSonesJL. From Inhibition of Trophoblast Cell Invasion to Proapoptosis: What are the Potential Roles of Kisspeptins in Preeclampsia? Am J Physiol - Regul Integr Comp Physiol (2021) 321(1):R41–8. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00258.2020
67
KrielessiVPapantoniouNPapageorgiouIChatzipapasIManiosEZakopoulosNet al. Clinical Study Placental Pathology and Blood Pressure’s Level in Women With Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Int (2012) 2012:6. doi: 10.1155/2012/684083
68
RyanEAEnnsL. Role of Gestational Hormones in the Induction of Insulin Resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (1988) 67(2):341–7. doi: 10.1210/jcem-67-2-341
69
BuchananTA. Pancreatic B-Cell Defects in Gestational Diabetes: Implications for the Pathogenesis and Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes. J Clin Endocr Metab (2001) 86(3):989–93. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.3.7339
70
GuariguataLLinnenkampUBeagleyJWhitingDRChoNH. Global Estimates of the Prevalence of Hyperglycaemia in Pregnancy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract (2014) 103(2):176–85. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.003
71
Hauge-EvansACRichardsonCCMilneHMChristieMRPersaudSJJonesPM. A Role for Kisspeptin in Islet Function. Diabetologia (2006) 49:2131–35. doi: 10.1007/S00125-006-0343-Z
72
BoweJEFootVLAmielSAHuangGCLambMLakeyJet al. GPR54 Peptide Agonists Stimulate Insulin Secretion From Murine, Porcine and Human Islets. Islets (2012) 4(1):20–23. doi: 10.4161/isl.18261
73
SchwetzTAReissausCAPistonDW. Differential Stimulation of Insulin Secretion by GLP-1 and Kisspeptin-10. PloS One (2014) 9(11):113020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113020
74
BoweJEKingAJKinsey-JonesJSFootVLLiXFO’byrneKTet al. Kisspeptin Stimulation of Insulin Secretion: Mechanisms of Action in Mouse Islets and Rats. Diabetologia (2009) 52. doi: 10.1007/S00125-009-1283-1
75
Izzi-EngbeayaCComninosANClarkeSAJomardAYangLJonesSet al. The Effects of Kisspeptin on β-Cell Function, Serum Metabolites and Appetite in Humans. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism (2018) 20(12):2800–10. doi: 10.1111/dom.13460
76
VikmanJAhrénB. Inhibitory Effect of Kisspeptins on Insulin Secretion From Isolated Mouse Islets. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism (2009) 11(4):197–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01116.x
77
TolsonKPMarookiNWolfeASmithJTKauffmanAS. Cre/lox Generation of a Novel Whole-Body Kiss1r KO Mouse Line Recapitulates a Hypogonadal, Obese, and Metabolically-Impaired Phenotype HHS Public Access. Mol Cell Endocrinol (2019) 498:110559. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2019.110559
78
SmithLIFBoweJE. The Pancreas and the Placenta: Understanding Gestational Diabetes and Why Some Islets Fail to Cope With Pregnancy. Biochem (Lond) (2021) 43(2):42–6. doi: 10.1042/bio_2021_115
79
VogelJPChawanpaiboonSMollerABWatananirunKBonetMLumbiganonP. The Global Epidemiology of Preterm Birth. Best Pract Research: Clin Obstetrics Gynaecol (2018) 52:3–12. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.04.003
80
TuckerJMcGuireW. Epidemiology of Preterm Birth. Br Med J (2004) 329(7467):387–91. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7467.675
81
SeymourAJScottVAugustineRABouwerGTCampbellREBrownCH. Development of an Excitatory Kisspeptin Projection to the Oxytocin System in Late Pregnancy. J Physiol (2017) 595(3):825–38. doi: 10.1113/JP273051
82
UnterscheiderJDalySGearyMPKennellyMMMcAuliffeFMO’DonoghueKet al. Optimizing the Definition of Intrauterine Growth Restriction: The Multicenter Prospective PORTO Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol (2013) 208(4):e1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.007
83
McCowanLMERobertsCTDekkerGATaylorRSChanEHYKennyLCet al. Risk Factors for Small-for-Gestational-Age Infants by Customised Birthweight Centiles: Data From an International Prospective Cohort Study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol (2010) 117(13):1599–1607. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02737.x
84
ThameMOsmondCBennettFWilksRForresterT. Fetal Growth is Directly Related to Maternal Anthropometry and Placental Volume. Eur J Clin Nutr (2004) 58(6):894–900. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601909
85
HafnerEMetzenbauerMHöfingerDMunkelMGassnerRSchuchterKet al. Placental Growth From the First to the Second Trimester of Pregnancy in SGA-Foetuses and Pre-Eclamptic Pregnancies Compared to Normal Foetuses. Placenta (2003) 24(4):336–42. doi: 10.1053/plac.2002.0918
86
BiscaroABragaABerkowitzRS. Diagnóstico, Classificação E Tratamento Da Neoplasia Trofoblástica Gestacional. Rev Bras Ginecol e Obstet (2014) 37(1):42–51. doi: 10.1590/SO100-720320140005198
87
GoldsteinDPBerkowitzRS. Current Management of Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am (2012) 26(1):111–31. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2011.10.007
88
YangJXiangYWanXYangX. The Prognosis of Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia Patient With Residual Lung Tumor After Completing Treatment. Gynecol Oncol (2006) 103(2):479–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.03.015
89
HorikoshiYMatsumotoHTakatsuYOhtakiTKitadaCUsukiSet al. Dramatic Elevation of Plasma Metastin Concentrations in Human Pregnancy: Metastin as a Novel Placenta-Derived Hormone in Humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2003) 88(2):914–9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-021235
Summary
Keywords
gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), pre-ecalmpsia (PET), foetal growth restriction (FGR), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), preterm (birth), miscarriage, kisspeptin
Citation
Tsoutsouki J, Patel B, Comninos AN, Dhillo WS and Abbara A (2022) Kisspeptin in the Prediction of Pregnancy Complications. Front. Endocrinol. 13:942664. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.942664
Received
12 May 2022
Accepted
16 June 2022
Published
19 July 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Junping Wen, Fujian Provincial Hospital, China
Reviewed by
Juan Scheun, University of South Africa, South Africa
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Tsoutsouki, Patel, Comninos, Dhillo and Abbara.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Waljit S. Dhillo, w.dhillo@imperial.ac.uk; Ali Abbara, ali.abbara@imperial.ac.uk
†These authors share first authorship
‡These authors share senior authorship
This article was submitted to Reproduction, a section of the journal Frontiers in Endocrinology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.