<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Endocrinol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Endocrinology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Endocrinol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-2392</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fendo.2023.1094339</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Endocrinology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Incorporation size of lymph node metastasis focus and pre-ablation stimulated Tg could more effectively predict clinical outcomes in differentiated thyroid cancer patients without distant metastases</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname>
<given-names>Jiahao</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Pan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Jing</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname>
<given-names>Xiaoqin</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname>
<given-names>Jiaxin</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xiong</surname>
<given-names>Xiaoli</given-names>
</name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2125935"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Chunyan</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname>
<given-names>Liqin</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Juqing</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname>
<given-names>Huijuan</given-names>
</name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1521792"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Ouyang</surname>
<given-names>Wei</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2088527"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<institution>Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou</institution>, <addr-line>Guangdong</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Bertrand Duvillie, Institut Curie, France</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Adnan I&#x15f;g&#xf6;r, Memorial Sisli Hospital, T&#xfc;rkiye; Chao Ma, Tongji University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Wei Ouyang, <email xlink:href="mailto:oyw1963@sina.com">oyw1963@sina.com</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn003">
<p>&#x2020;These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002">
<p>This article was submitted to Cancer Endocrinology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Endocrinology</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>21</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1094339</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>10</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>07</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Xie, Chen, Wang, Luo, Luo, Xiong, Li, Pan, Wu, Feng and Ouyang</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Xie, Chen, Wang, Luo, Luo, Xiong, Li, Pan, Wu, Feng and Ouyang</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Background</title>
<p>The size of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and pre-ablation stimulated Tg (ps-Tg) were key predictors of clinical prognosis in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients, however, very few studies combine the above two as predictors of clinical prognosis of DTC patients.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>Persistent/recurrent disease and clinicopathologic factors were analyzed in 543 DTC patients without distant metastases who underwent LN dissection, near-total/total thyroidectomy, and radioiodine ablation.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>In the multivariate analysis, size of LNM, ps-Tg, and the activity of <sup>131</sup>I significantly correlated with long-term remission. The optimal cutoff size of LNM 0.4 cm-1.4 cm (intermediate-risk patients) and &gt;1.4cm (high-risk patients) increased the recurrence risk (hazard ratio [95% CI], 4.674 [2.881-7.583] and 13.653 [8.135&#x2013;22.913], respectively). Integration of ps-Tg into the reclassification risk stratification showed that ps-Tg &#x2264; 10.1 ng/mL was relevant to a greatly heightened possibility of long-term remission (92.2%&#x2013;95.4% in low-risk patients, 67.3%&#x2013;87.0% in intermediate-risk patients, and 32.3%&#x2013;57.7% in high-risk patients).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The cutoff of 0.4&#xa0;cm and 1.4&#xa0;cm for a definition of size of LNM in DTC patients without distant metastases can reclassify risk assessment, and incorporating ps-Tg could more effectively predict clinical outcomes and modify the postoperative management plan.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>differentiated thyroid cancer</kwd>
<kwd>lymph node metastasis</kwd>
<kwd>pre-ablation stimulated Tg</kwd>
<kwd>131I therapy</kwd>
<kwd>prognosis</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100012245</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="4"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="31"/>
<page-count count="11"/>
<word-count count="4454"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>In recent decades, differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), specially papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), is continually metastasizes to the cervical lymph nodes(LN), the occurrence of lymph node metastases (LNM) in PTC has been reported to range from 31.5% to 50.0% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>). Therefore, further attention has been paid to accurate evaluation of the risk stratification in patients with DTC. Recently, the 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) Initial Risk Stratification System based on LNM has been proposed for assessing the chance of having poor prognosis during follow-up (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>). Nevertheless, based on clinical experience, the size of LNM is commonly distributed between 0.2&#xa0;cm and 3&#xa0;cm. Therefore, the 2015 risk stratification system may not precisely predict the clinical prognosis.</p>
<p>The size of LNM is defined as a focus full of thyroid cancer metastases in the LNM with the largest dimension. Emerging literature has demonstrated that the size of LNM is an independent risk factor of persistent/recurrent disease in DTC patients. As the size of LNM increases, it is more significantly associated with poor prognosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>). Recent writing has reported that pre-ablation stimulated Tg (ps-Tg) measured under levothyroxine withdrawal just earlier radioiodine (RAI) ablation is an independent risk factor of persistent/recurrent disease, the ps-Tg (&#x2264;10.1 &#x3bc;g/L) is greatly connected with long-term remission in DTC patients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>).</p>
<p>The size of LNM and ps-Tg were key predictors of clinical prognosis in DTC patients, however, very few studies combine the above two as predictors of clinical prognosis of DTC patients. This research was undertaken to find out the optimum cutoff size of LNM and to incorporate size of LNM and ps-Tg to accurately assess clinical prognosis in patients with DTC.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<title>Data source</title>
<p>We retrospected the electronic medical records of DTC patients from July 2014 to June 2017 at the Department of Nuclear Medicine at Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, after getting of approval by the local Institutional Review Board.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<title>Patients</title>
<p>The patients who underwent cervical LN dissection, near-total/total thyroidectomy and then conduct the first RAI ablation in our hospital (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>) were ruled out if they meet the following standards (1): patients had distant metastases upon surgery or in initial RAI ablation, (2) patients had missing data or incomplete data on size of LNM, (3) patients had previous RAI ablation in other hospitals, (4) patients had positive thyroglobulin antibody (TgAb) (&gt; 115 IU/mL), (5) patient follow-up time was &lt; 24 months after the first RAI ablation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Initial patients&#x2019; selection, occurrence of persistence/recurrence during follow-up.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fendo-14-1094339-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The data was reviewed including patient demographics, surgery, and pathology reports. The pathologic TNM classification was based on the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC), 8th edition.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<title>Size of LNM and Tg measurements</title>
<p>The size of LNM is defined as a focus full of thyroid cancer metastases in the LNM with the largest dimension observed in multiple serial sections using microscope. The pathology slides were analyzed and measured the size of metastatic foci in each LN by An experienced pathologist (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>).</p>
<p>Roche Cobase 801 electrochemiluminescence instrument was utilized for measurement of Tg (measuring range: 0.04&#x2013;5000 &#x3bc;g/L). All ps-Tg was measured underlevothyroxine withdrawal just earlier RAI ablation in the same laboratory in our hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<title>Treatment and follow-up</title>
<p>Before RAI ablation, patients were informed to obey a low-iodine dietary for 3&#x2013;4 weeks and levothyroxine withdrawal for 3 weeks; this was prolonged for 1 week if TSH levels did not reach 30 &#x3bc;IU/mL. An empiric RAI administered activity was used to decide the activity of 131I, using 1.85&#x2013;3.70 GBq for thyroid remnant ablation and 3.70&#x2013;7.40 GBq for postoperative residual cervical LNM.</p>
<p>After the initial RAI ablation, follow up every 3-6 months for the first 2 years. When achieving stable disease, follow up every 6-12 months. Patients were regularly followed-up with <italic>via</italic> measurement of Tg, thyroglobulin antibody (TgAb), and neck ultrasound during thyroid hormone therapy, using the 2009 ATA guidelines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>). Additional imaging methods including 18F-FDG PET/CT, 131I whole-body scans(WBS), chest and mediastinal computed tomography were performed when suppressed Tg (rTG) was &gt;1 &#x3bc;g/L or when suspicious loco-regional/distant metastases were detected.</p>
<p>Incomplete biochemical or structural response within one year of the initial RAI ablation was considered persistence disease. Meanwhile, patients who were earlier considered as having significant effect to therapy was defined as recurrence disease, when they show functional, structural, or biochemical evidence of disease. For the above patients, further treatment plans including repeated surgery, extra RAI therapy, and other therapies were taken by the attending physician.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<title>Clinical outcomes evaluation and definition</title>
<p>A total of data locked in June 2022 were utilized to determine clinical outcomes. At final follow-up, patients were considered to have long-term remission if they had a rTG &lt; 1 &#x3bc;g/L, no observable TgAb, and no structurally identifiable evidence. Patients were considered as having persistent/recurrent disease if they had a rTG &gt; 1 &#x3bc;g/L, stimulated Tg &gt; 10 &#x3bc;g/L, or any evidence of disease on functional imaging (18F-FDG PET/CT, 131I WBS), structural imaging (ultrasonic, CT, or MRI), or biopsy-proven disease. Patients with persistent/recurrent disease were classed as having either structural evidence of disease on imaging or biochemical evidence of disease (rising TgAb, rTG &gt; 1 &#x3bc;g/L, or stimulated Tg &gt; 10 &#x3bc;g/L without a structural evidence of disease). And patients with structural evidence of disease were fulfilled the undermentioned standards (1): highly suspicious focus on the neck ultrasound (short axis &gt; 5&#xa0;mm, number, rounded shape, irregular margins, loss of the fatty hilum, enlarged cortex, heterogeneous parenchymal echotexture, hypoechoic parenchymal echogenicity, calcifications, cystic change or necrosis, disorganized peripheral vascularity during follow-up), (2) positive cytology/histology, or (3) findings on 18F-FDG PET/CT, 131I WBS, or other imaging highly suspicious of metastatic evidence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>). Disease free survival (DFS) was defined as the period of time among the discovery of persistent/recurrent disease and first operation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 26.0). Categorical data were presented as numbers and percentages. Qualitative parameters were analyzed using chi square test or Fisher&#x2019;s exact test and are expressed as frequencies and percentages. Continuous data were presented as the mean &#xb1; SD or the median (range). A P value &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The X-tile software was used to acquire the optimum cut-off for the size of LNM to predict persistent/recurrent disease (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>). Multivariate analysis was done for variables with a P value &lt; 0.05 in the univariate analysis to determine the statistical risk factors associated with poor prognosis. Curves of DFS were fabricated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank tests were used to assess the differences in DFS among the risk stratification. Missing data were handled using complete case analysis.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<title>Patient characteristics</title>
<p>Of the 1,452 consecutive DTC patients who underwent near-total/total thyroidectomy administered in our department during the study, 77 patients were excluded because they did not undergo neck LN dissection, 344 patients were excluded because they had &lt;24 months of follow up, 121 patients were excluded because of distant metastases upon surgery or initial RAI ablation, and 43 patients were excluded because they had received previous 131I treatment at other hospitals. In addition, 150 patients were excluded due to missing data or incomplete data on size of LNM (missing pathology reports: N = 32, incomplete data on size of LNM: N = 118), and 174 patients were ruled out due to the positive TgAb (&gt;115 IU/mL). Finally, 543 patients with DTC were involved in the final cohort (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>The median of the primary tumor size was 1.5&#xa0;cm (range: 0&#x2013;9.0 cm). Patients with positive LN was 494 (91.0%), with a median number of positive LNs of 5 (range: 0&#x2013;79). The median size of LNM was 0.4&#xa0;cm (range: 0&#x2013;5.0 cm). The median 131I-administered activity was 5.55 GBq (range: 1.85&#x2013;22.94 GBq). The number of patients with multiple RAI ablation was 101 (18.6%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Characteristics of the study patients (n = 543).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Characteristics</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">No. of patients</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">543</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sex<break/>Male<break/>Female</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">191(35.2%)<break/>352(64.8%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Age at diagnosis (y), median (range)<break/>&lt;55<break/>&#x2265;55</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">39(6-76)<break/>481(88.6%)<break/>62(11.4%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Extent of lymph node dissection<break/>Central lymph node dissection<break/>Lateral lymph node dissection<break/>Central and lateral lymph node dissection</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">247(45.5%)<break/>19(3.5%)<break/>277(51.0%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Histology<break/>Classic PTC<break/>FV-PTC<break/>FTC<break/>Aggressive histology</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">519(95.6%)<break/>9(1.7%)<break/>5(0.9%)<break/>10(1.8%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Incomplete tumor resection</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8(1.5%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Gross ETE</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">87(16.0%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BMI(kg/m2)<break/>&lt;18.5<break/>18.5-24<break/>&gt;24</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">52(9.8%)<break/>287(52.9%)<break/>190(35.0%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Primary tumor size (cm), median (range)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.5cm(0&#x2013;9cm)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bilateral tumor</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">177(32.6%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Multifocal tumor</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">253(46.6%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Capsular invasion</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">325(59.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Invasion of loco-regional tissues or structures</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">133(24.5%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Vascular invasion</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">64(11.8%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Invade nerves</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">41(7.6%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ta<break/>T0<break/>T1<break/>T2<break/>T3<break/>T4<break/>Tx</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">3(0.6%)<break/>329(62.3%)<break/>93(17.6%)<break/>67(12.7%)<break/>34(6.4%)<break/>2(0.4%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Na<break/>N0<break/>N1a<break/>N1b</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">48(8.8%)<break/>252(46.4%)<break/>243(44.8%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Initial risk stratification<break/>Low risk<break/>Intermediate risk<break/>High risk</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">64(11.8%)<break/>405(74.6%)<break/>74(13.6%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BRAFV600E mutation of primary tumor</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">366(80.8%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Number of invaded lymph nodes, median (range)<break/>&gt;5<break/>&#x2264;5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5(0-79)<break/>220(40.1%)<break/>323(58.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Size of the largest metastatic LN(cm),median (range)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.4cm(0&#x2013;5cm)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Extranodal extension of LN</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">199(46.1%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Multiple RAI ablation</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">101(18.6%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cumulative 131I-administered activities(GBq), median (range)<break/>&lt;7.40<break/>&#x2265;7.40</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">5.55(1.85-22.94)<break/>440(81.0%)<break/>103(19.0%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ps-Tg (ng/mL), median (range)<break/>&lt;10<break/>&#x2265;10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.47(0.04-1511.20)<break/>360(66.3%)<break/>183(33.7%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TSH(&#x3bc;IU/mL), median (range)<break/>&lt;30<break/>&#x2265;30</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">63.19(5.26-115.92)<break/>22(4.1%)<break/>521(95.9%)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TGAb (kU/L), median (range)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">14.31(10.00-114.60)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Follow-up information Median follow-up (m), median (range)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">63 (24-122)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Last status<break/>No evidence of disease<break/>Persistent structural disease<break/>Persistent biomedical disease<break/>Recurrent structural disease<break/>Recurrent biomedical disease</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">414(76.2%)<break/>68(12.5%)<break/>16(2.9%)<break/>38(7.1%)<break/>7(1.3%)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>PTC, papillary thyroid cancer; FTC, follicular thyroid cancer; FV-PTC, follicular variant PTC; ps-Tg, pre-ablation stimulated thyroglobulin; LN, lymph node; BMI, Body Mass Index; ETE, extrathyroidal extension. TSH, thyroid stimulating hormone; TGAb, thyroglobulin antibody. aTNM staging was determined by 8th American Joint Cancer Committee Tumor-Node-Metastasis stage system.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<title>Outcomes</title>
<p>The median of follow-up was 63 months (range: 24&#x2013;122 months). Before initial RAI ablation, 356 patients had no functional or structural evidence of disease and 48 (13.5%) patients had poor prognosis at final follow-up. In addition, 71 patients had highly suspected structural evidence of disease upon ultrasonic examination, and 43 (60.6%) patients had persistent/recurrent disease. Functional evidence of disease was found in 83 patients upon 131I post-therapy WBS, only 16 (19.3%) patients had persistent/recurrent disease, 33 patients had structural and functional evidence of disease, and 22 (66.7%) patients had persistent/recurrent disease.</p>
<p>Further, 442 patients taken one RAI ablation, and 57 (12.9%) patients had poor prognosis. Ninety-two patients taken two RAI ablations, 62 (70.7%) patients had poor prognosis, 9 patients taken three RAI ablations, and 7 (77.8%) patients had poor prognosis.</p>
<p>Generally, long-term remission was obtained in 414 patients (76.2%). In total 129 patients (23.8%) had poor prognosis, 106 patients (19.6%) had a structural incomplete response, and 23 patients (4.2%) had a biochemical incomplete response. Twenty-one patients with positive cytology/histology underwent repeated surgery, 7 patients (33.3%) had a significant effect, 6 patients (28.6%) changed from structural incomplete response to biochemical incomplete response, 7 patients (33.3%) maintained structural incomplete response, and 1 patient (4.8%) had distant metastases. There were no death associated with DTC during study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<title>Performance of size of LNM</title>
<p>The median value of the size of LNM was 0.4&#xa0;cm (range, 0&#x2013;5.0 cm), with a median value of 0.3&#xa0;cm in patients with long-term remission and 1.1&#xa0;cm in patients with poor prognosis (P &lt; 0.001) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). The median of time interval among first operation and initial RAI ablation was 2.0 months (range, 0&#x2013;103 months).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(A)</bold> Box plot of the distribution of size of the largest metastatic LN in 1310 cases (all patients with size of the largest metastatic LN) and 543 cases (the final cohort consisted of 543 patients). In 1310 cases, the mean value of size of the largest metastatic LN was 0.66cm (range,0-5cm).In 543 cases, the mean value of size of the largest metastatic LN was 0.62cm (range,0-5cm) (p=0.189). <bold>(B)</bold> Box plot of the distribution of size of the largest metastatic LN based on response to the therapy at the end of follow-up. The corresponding median size of the largest metastatic LN was 0.3cm and 1.1cm, respectively, for patients classified as disease free and these with persistent/recurrent disease. The size of the largest metastatic LN results are plotted on a logarithmic scale. LN, lymph node.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fendo-14-1094339-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The optimum cut-off value for the size of LNM was decided using the X-tile software (version 3.6.1, Yale University), and the result is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref>. All patients were divided into 3 risk stratification for the assessment of long-term remission. There were 282 patients with the size of LNM &#x2264; 0.4&#xa0;cm (low-risk group), 199 patients with the size of LNM ranging from 0.4&#xa0;cm to 1.4&#xa0;cm (intermediate-risk group), and 62 patients with the size of LNM &gt; 1.4&#xa0;cm (high-risk group) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold>
</xref>). Curves of DFS were shown in the Kaplan-Meier method, the low-risk group had 92.2% DFS rates, intermediate-risk group had 67.3% DFS rates, high-risk group had 32.3% DFS rates. The hazard ratio (95% CI) of the high-risk patients and intermediate-risk patients were 13.653 (8.135&#x2013;22.913) and 4.674 (2.881&#x2013;7.583), respectively. The low-risk patients was used as the reference (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3C</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(A)</bold> The X-tile software of size of the largest metastatic LN for the prediction of persistent/recurrent disease vs long-term remission. <bold>(B)</bold> Patient frequency according to the size of the largest metastatic LN (the optimal cutoffs were 0.4cm and 1.4cm); <bold>(C)</bold> Kaplan Meier survival curves for different risk groups (P &lt; 0.001).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fendo-14-1094339-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<title>Univariate and multivariate analyses of long-term remission</title>
<p>During the univariate analyses, various risk factors were identified to be significantly related to predictors of long-term remission (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Meanwhile, these risk factors were further included in multivariate analysis. Cumulative 131I-administered activity, the size of LNM and ps-Tg were independent factors in predicting clinical outcome (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Univariate analysis of predictors of persistent/recurrent disease.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Parameters</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Long-term remission</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Persistence/recurrence</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">&#x3c7;2 or Fisher</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">P</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">No. of patients (%</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">414</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">129</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sex<break/>Male<break/>Female</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">135<break/>279</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">56<break/>73</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.033</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.025</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Age (y)<break/>&#x2265;55<break/>&lt;55</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">46<break/>368</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">16<break/>113</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.162</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.687</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Extent of lymph node dissection<break/>Central lymph node dissection<break/>Lateral lymph node dissection<break/>Central and lateral lymph node dissection</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">214<break/>12<break/>188</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">33<break/>7<break/>89</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.257</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Number of surgeries<break/>1<break/>2 or moer</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">384<break/>30</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">99<break/>30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25.647</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Histology<break/>Classic PTC<break/>FV-PTC<break/>FTC<break/>Aggressive histology</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">398<break/>8<break/>5<break/>3</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">121<break/>1<break/>0<break/>7</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.215</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Incomplete tumor resection<break/>Yes<break/>No</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">5<break/>409</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">3<break/>126</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.847</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.357</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Gross ETE<break/>Yes<break/>No</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">54<break/>360</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">33<break/>96</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">11.491</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BMI(kg/m<sup>2</sup>)<break/>&lt;18.5<break/>18.5-24<break/>&gt;24</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">42<break/>214<break/>148</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">10<break/>73<break/>42</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.321</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.517</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Primary tumor size (cm)<break/>&#x2264;2<break/>&gt;2<break/>X</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">304<break/>95<break/>2</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">86<break/>41<break/>0</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.254</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.119</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bilaterality<break/>Yes<break/>No</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">129<break/>285</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">48<break/>81</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.638</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.201</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Multifocality<break/>Yes<break/>No</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">178<break/>236</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">75<break/>54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.065</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Capsular invasion<break/>Yes<break/>No</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">224<break/>190</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">101<break/>28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.948</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Invasion of loco-regional tissues or structures<break/>Yes<break/>No</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">83<break/>331</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">50<break/>79</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.619</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Vascular invasion<break/>Yes<break/>No</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">39<break/>375</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">25<break/>104</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.383</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.002</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Invade nerves<break/>Yes<break/>No</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">26<break/>386</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">15<break/>114</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.966</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.046</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T<break/>T0T1&#x3001;T2<break/>T3&#x3001;T4&#x3001;Tx</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">339<break/>62</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">87<break/>41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.990</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">N<break/>N0<break/>N1a<break/>N1b</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">45<break/>211<break/>158</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">3<break/>41<break/>85</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32.818</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ATA risk stratification<break/>Low<break/>Intermediate<break/>High</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">62<break/>309<break/>43</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">2<break/>96<break/>31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.478</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BRAFV600E mutation of primary tumor<break/>Yes<break/>No</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">276<break/>68</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">90<break/>19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.291</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.589</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Number of invaded lymph nodes<break/>&#x2264;5<break/>&gt;5</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">275<break/>139</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">48<break/>81</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">34.834</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Size of the largest metastatic LN(cm)<break/>&#x2264;0.4<break/>0.4-1.4<break/>&gt;1.4</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">260<break/>134<break/>20</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">22<break/>65<break/>42</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">114.573</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Extranodal extension of LN<break/>Yes<break/>No</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">123<break/>199</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">76<break/>34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">31.493</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cumulative <sup>131</sup>I-administered activities(GBq)<break/>&#x2264; 7.40<break/>&gt; 7.40</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">385<break/>29</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">55<break/>74</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">162.279</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ps-Tg (ng/mL)<break/>&#x2264;10.1<break/>&gt;10.1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">324<break/>90</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">36<break/>93</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">111.610</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>ATA, American Thyroid Association; PTC, papillary thyroid cancer; FTC, follicular thyroid cancer; FV-PTC, follicular variant PTC; ps-Tg, preablation stimulated thyroglobulin; LN, lymph node; BMI, Body Mass Index; ETE, extrathyroidal extension.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Multivariate analysis of predictors of persistent/recurrent disease.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Parameters</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">OR(95%)</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">P</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sex<break/>Male<break/>Female</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1<break/>0.993(0.531-1.858)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.982</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Extent of lymph node dissection<break/>Central lymph node dissection<break/>Lateral lymph node dissection<break/>Central and lateral lymph node dissection</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1<break/>0.649(0.121-3.482)<break/>0.582(0.175-1.935)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.614<break/>0.377</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Number of surgeries<break/>1<break/>2 or more</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1<break/>1.598(0.641-3.983)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.315</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Histology<break/>Classic PTC<break/>FV-PTC<break/>FTC<break/>Aggressive histology</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1<break/>0.979(0.081-11.846)<break/>0<break/>6.217(0.426-90.734)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.987<break/>0.999<break/>0.182</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Gross ETE<break/>Yes<break/>No</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1<break/>0.950(0.210-4.292)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.946</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Multifocality<break/>Yes<break/>No</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1<break/>1.224(0.649-2.308)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.533</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Capsular invasion<break/>Yes<break/>No</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1<break/>1.165(0.535-2.537)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.701</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Invasion of loco-regional tissues or structures<break/>Yes<break/>No</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1<break/>1.501(0.679-3.319)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.316</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Vascular invasion<break/>Yes<break/>No</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1<break/>1.218(0.485-3.058)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.674</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T<break/>T0&#x3001;T1&#x3001;T2<break/>T3&#x3001;T4&#x3001;Tx</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1<break/>0.933(0.339-2.571)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.894</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">N<break/>N0<break/>N1a<break/>N1b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.432(0.738-8.012)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.144</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ATA risk stratification<break/>Low<break/>Intermediate<break/>High</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1<break/>3.278(0.367-29.235)<break/>3.634(0.237-55.784)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.288<break/>0.354</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Number of invaded lymph nodes<break/>&#x2264;5<break/>&gt;5</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1<break/>0.760(0.363-1.593)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1<break/>0.468</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Size of the largest metastatic LN(cm)<break/>&#x2264;0.4<break/>0.4-1.4<break/>&gt;1.4</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1<break/>2.444(1.100-5.432)<break/>6.614(2.204-19.850)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.028<break/>0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Extranodal extension of LN<break/>Yes<break/>No</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1<break/>1.280(0.660-2.485)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.465</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cumulative 131I-administered activities(GBq)<break/>&#x2264;7,40<break/>&gt;7.40</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1<break/>6.679(3.162-14.109)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ps-Tg (ng/mL)<break/>&#x2264;10.1<break/>&gt;10.1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1<break/>4.646(2.457-8.786)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">&lt;0.001</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>ATA, American Thyroid Association; PTC, papillary thyroid cancer; FTC, follicular thyroid cancer; FV-PTC, follicular variant PTC; ps-Tg, pre-ablation stimulated thyroglobulin; LN, lymph node; BMI, Body Mass Index; ETE, extrathyroidal extension.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<title>Integrating the size of LNM with ps-Tg</title>
<p>Recently, some studies report that the ps-Tg cut-off was 10.1 &#x3bc;g/L (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>). When we combined the size of LNM with ps-Tg (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>), we found that patients with a ps-Tg &#x2264; 10.1 &#x3bc;g/L had a considerably increased DFS rates (low-risk = 95.4%, intermediate-risk = 87.0%, and high-risk = 57.7%). In contrast, patients with ps-Tg &gt; 10.1 &#x3bc;g/L had a considerably reduced DFS rates in each risk group (92.2&#x2013;81.0% in low-risk patients, 67.3%&#x2013;40.5% in intermediate risk patients, and 32.3%&#x2013;13.9% in high-risk patients) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Kaplan-Meier curves for disease-free survival (DFS) in DTC patients according to size of the largest metastatic LN and the integration with ps-Tg,which were measured after thyroid hormone withdrawal.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fendo-14-1094339-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>In our study, we found that patients with highly suspected structural evidence of disease or both highly suspected structural and functional evidence of disease before initial RAI ablation had poorer long-term remission (39.4% and 33.3%, respectively). In addition, patients with NSD or only functional evidence had excellent long-term remission (86.5% and 80.7%, respectively). Patients with two or more RAI ablations had poorer long-term remission (two ablations = 29.3%, three ablations =22.2%). Patients with structural evidence of disease had improved clinical outcomes (61.9%) following repeated surgery.</p>
<p>In summary, our data show the prognostic value of the size of LNM for predicting long-term remission. The cutoff of 0.4&#xa0;cm and 1.4&#xa0;cm for a definition of LNM in pN1 can reclassify risk assessment. In our cohort, the low-risk group had 92.2% DFS rates, intermediate-risk group had 67.3% DFS rates, high-risk group had 32.3% DFS rates. This held true for all patients who underwent neck LN dissection.</p>
<p>More significantly, this study demonstrated that integration of the size of LNM with ps-Tg more accurately predicted long-term remission. The ps-Tg &#x2264; 10.1 &#x3bc;g/L had a greatly increased DFS rates to 95.4%, 87.0%, and 57.7% in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, respectively. Conversely, the ps-Tg &gt; 10.1 &#x3bc;g/L had a greatly reduced DFS rates for all categories (92.2%&#x2013;81.0% in low-risk patients, 67.3%&#x2013;40.5% in intermediate-risk patients, and 32.3%&#x2013;13.9% in high-risk patients).</p>
<p>Although LNM related to clinical outcomes has been reported previously. For example, in a study including 3,198 TC patients, Zhang et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>) found that N stage was associated with poor prognosis. Patients with NX were associated with the worst long-term remission and the highest mortality risk, while patients with pN1 were more possible to occur lung metastasis (48%). In most studies analyzing the size of LNM (cut-off value between 0.2&#xa0;cm and 3&#xa0;cm) using the 2015 ATA guidelines, LN micrometastasis (&lt; 0.2&#xa0;cm) referred to breast cancer and other solid tumors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>). In a study, 16-year follow-up of 233 PTC patients showed that patients with N0 or LN micrometastasis had excellent long-term remission (87.3% and 83.8%, respectively) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>). This is consistent with our findings that patients with N0 and LN micrometastasis had excellent long-term remission (93.9% and 94.9%, respectively), meanwhile, this study found that a size of LNM &#x2265; 2&#xa0;mm was significantly associated with persistent/recurrent disease. Differently, Lee et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>) found that the newly proposed definition of LN micrometastasis using a cut-off value of 3.5&#xa0;mm resulted in reclassification of the risk estimates of structural recurrence. And another study has similar report that the size of LNM (cut-off value of 0.536&#xa0;cm) was significantly associated with a structural incomplete response (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>). In addition, several studies have estimated optimal cut-off values (1.0&#xa0;cm, 1.5&#xa0;cm, and 3.0&#xa0;cm, respectively) for the size of LNM to predict clinical outcomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>). It should be mentioned that the cut-off values (0.4&#xa0;cm and 1.4&#xa0;cm) in our study are close to the above results. Finally, in clinical practice, it is very rare to identify bulky LN metastasis (&#x2265;3 cm). In a study of 184 patients, Iglesias et&#xa0;al. identified only four cases (2.2%) of huge LN metastasis, which is consistent with the two cases shown in our data (0.4%) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>). Therefore, size of LNM using 2015 ATA guidelines may lead to the inaccurate prediction of clinical outcomes. Furthermore, Barres et&#xa0;al. and Tian et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>) demonstrated that ps-Tg (cut-off value of 10.1 ug/L) had significant effects on long-term remission in two large studies involving 1,319 and 2,524 patients. Although the impact of the size of LNM on long-term remission has been reported previously, most studies report only one cut-off value. We divided the patients into 3 risk stratification, and, for the first time, combined the size of LNM with ps-Tg to predict long-term remission.</p>
<p>Some patients did not exhibit LN micrometastasis in the neck preoperative, or were diagnosed as low-risk and did not undergo neck LN dissection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>). This may lead to selection bias, and therefore, such patients were not included in this study (p = 0.13). Although some studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>) have suggested that having cN0 or LN micrometastasis may not reduce the overall survival rate, Zhao et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>) found that prophylactic central neck dissection reduced regional recurrence. Therefore, it has been suggested in recent years that patients with DTC should be offered more aggressive surgery (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>).</p>
<p>The overall DFS rate of 76.2% are coincided with the Statistical data found in some recent research (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>). However, our research has some shortages. First, different surgical scope, the retrospective design, and the single-center research design were prone to selection biases. Second, the usefulness of the size of LNM and ps-Tg measurements was researched through post analysis. Furthermore, the size of LNM was measured at our hospital before initial RAI ablation in some patients, which may affect the accuracy of measurement. In addition, only the size of LNM and extranodal extension of LN (some data on extranodal extension of LN were missing) were considered. Therefore, we did not analyze each LN and its distribution. Finally, although a median follow-up period of 63 months is an acceptable start for prediction of long-term remission, longer follow-up are required to evaluate the long-term efficacy. However, it is important to note that recurrence disease was far more rare than persistent disease. This may be due to residual lesions (41.5%) caused by surgery (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>This study suggested the cutoff of 0.4&#xa0;cm and 1.4&#xa0;cm for a definition of size of LNM in DTC patients without distant metastases can reclassify risk assessment, and incorporating ps-Tg could more effectively predict clinical outcomes and modify the postoperative management plan.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>JX and WO contributed to the conception and design of the study. JW, XX, XL and CL organized the database and acquired the data. PC and JQW prepared the figures and tables. JL and LP performed the statistical analysis. JX wrote the first draft of the manuscript. WO and HF critically revised the manuscript and supplemented the data for the final draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This research was funded by the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (No.2019A141405043).</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>We thank LetPub (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.letpub.com">www.letpub.com</ext-link>) for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>YC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Na</surname> <given-names>SY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Park</surname> <given-names>GC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>JH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>SW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eun</surname> <given-names>YG</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Occult lymph node metastasis and risk of regional recurrence in papillary thyroid cancer after bilateral prophylactic central neck dissection: A multi-institutional study</article-title>. <source>Surgery</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>161</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<page-range>465&#x2013;71</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.surg.2016.07.031</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>JW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>XH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>BQ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>DL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qu</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Predictive factors for central lymph node and lateral cervical lymph node metastases in papillary thyroid carcinoma</article-title>. <source>Clin Transl Oncol</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>21</volume>(<issue>11</issue>):<page-range>1482&#x2013;91</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12094-019-02076-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Q</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Risk factor analysis for predicting cervical lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma: A study of 966 patients</article-title>. <source>BMC Canc.</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>19</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>622</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12885-019-5835-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>SY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>JJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhan</surname> <given-names>WW</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Clinical characteristics and ultrasonographic features for predicting central lymph node metastasis in clinically node-negative papillary thyroid carcinoma without capsule invasion</article-title>. <source>Head Neck.</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>41</volume>(<issue>11</issue>):<page-range>3984&#x2013;91</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/hed.25941</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Haugen</surname> <given-names>BR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alexander</surname> <given-names>EK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bible</surname> <given-names>KC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Doherty</surname> <given-names>GM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mandel</surname> <given-names>SJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nikiforov</surname> <given-names>YE</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>2015 American Thyroid association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: The American thyroid association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer</article-title>. <source>Thyroid</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>26</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>133</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/thy.2015.0020</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Grani</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zatelli</surname> <given-names>MC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alf&#xf2;</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Montesano</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Torlontano</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morelli</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Real-world performance of the American thyroid association risk estimates in predicting 1-year differentiated thyroid cancer outcomes: A prospective multicenter study of 2000 patients</article-title>. <source>Thyroid</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>31</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<page-range>264&#x2013;71</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/thy.2020.0272</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ouyang</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Size of the largest metastatic focus to the lymph node is associated with incomplete response of pn1 papillary thyroid carcinoma</article-title>. <source>Endocr Pract</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>25</volume>(<issue>9</issue>):<page-range>887&#x2013;98</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4158/EP-2018-0583</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Randolph</surname> <given-names>GW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duh</surname> <given-names>QY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heller</surname> <given-names>KS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>LiVolsi</surname> <given-names>VA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mandel</surname> <given-names>SJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Steward</surname> <given-names>DL</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>The prognostic significance of nodal metastases from papillary thyroid carcinoma can be stratified based on the size and number of metastatic lymph nodes, as well as the presence of extranodal extension</article-title>. <source>Thyroid</source> (<year>2012</year>) <volume>22</volume>(<issue>11</issue>):<page-range>1144&#x2013;52</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/thy.2012.0043</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Su</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>A mathematical model to assess the effect of residual positive lymph nodes on the survival of patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma</article-title>. <source>Front Oncol</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>12</volume>:<elocation-id>855830</elocation-id>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fonc.2022.855830</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>SY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>BW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pyo</surname> <given-names>JY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hong</surname> <given-names>SW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>HS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Park</surname> <given-names>CS</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Macrometastasis in papillary thyroid cancer patients is associated with higher recurrence in lateral neck nodes</article-title>. <source>World J Surg</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>42</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<page-range>123&#x2013;9</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00268-017-4158-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Leboulleux</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Girard</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rose</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Travagli</surname> <given-names>JP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sabbah</surname> <given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Caillou</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Ultrasound criteria of malignancy for cervical lymph nodes in patients followed up for differentiated thyroid cancer</article-title>. <source>J Clin Endocrinol Metab</source> (<year>2007</year>) <volume>92</volume>(<issue>9</issue>):<page-range>3590&#x2013;4</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1210/jc.2007-0444</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Iglesias</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gonz&#xe1;lez</surname> <given-names>O</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Temprana-Salvador</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garc&#xed;a-Burillo</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Caubet</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ram&#xf3;n</surname> <given-names>YCS</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Nodal metastatic load in papillary thyroid carcinoma. morphological and molecular analysis with one-step nucleic acid amplification on more than 550 lymph nodes</article-title>. <source>Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed).</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>68</volume>(<issue>5</issue>):<page-range>346&#x2013;53</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.endinu.2020.04.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Barres</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kelly</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kwiatkowski</surname> <given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Batisse-Lignier</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fouilhoux</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aubert</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Stimulated thyroglobulin and thyroglobulin reduction index predict excellent response in differentiated thyroid cancers</article-title>. <source>J Clin Endocrinol Metab</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>104</volume>(<issue>8</issue>):<page-range>3462&#x2013;72</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1210/jc.2018-02680</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>The association between lymph node stage and clinical prognosis in thyroid cancer</article-title>. <source>Front Endocrinol (Lausanne).</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>11</volume>:<elocation-id>90</elocation-id>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fendo.2020.00090</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jeon</surname> <given-names>MJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Park</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oh</surname> <given-names>HS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>TY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>WB</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>A follow-up strategy for patients with an excellent response to initial therapy for differentiated thyroid carcinoma: Less is better</article-title>. <source>Thyroid</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>28</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<page-range>187&#x2013;92</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/thy.2017.0130</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Prognostic implications of preablation stimulated tg: A retrospective analysis of 2500 thyroid cancer patients</article-title>. <source>J Clin Endocrinol Metab</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>106</volume>(<issue>11</issue>):<page-range>e4688&#x2013;e97</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1210/clinem/dgab445</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ouyang</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Postoperative thyroid remnants for differentiated thyroid cancer may not affect the outcome of high-dose radioiodine therapy</article-title>. <source>Oral Oncol</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>104</volume>:<fpage>104610</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104610</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cooper</surname> <given-names>DS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Doherty</surname> <given-names>GM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haugen</surname> <given-names>BR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kloos</surname> <given-names>RT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>SL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mandel</surname> <given-names>SJ</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Revised American thyroid association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer</article-title>. <source>Thyroid</source> (<year>2009</year>) <volume>19</volume>(<issue>11</issue>):<page-range>1167&#x2013;214</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/thy.2009.0110</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Aydin</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dellal</surname> <given-names>FD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tam</surname> <given-names>AA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ogmen</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kilicarslan</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Topaloglu</surname> <given-names>O</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Comparative analysis of diagnostic adequacy rate between aspiration and nonaspiration techniques of fine-needle cytology in patients with thyroid cancer and ultrasonographically suspicious cervical lymph nodes</article-title>. <source>Diagn Cytopathol.</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>45</volume>(<issue>10</issue>):<page-range>889&#x2013;94</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/dc.23793</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mitchell</surname> <given-names>AL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gandhi</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scott-Coombes</surname> <given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perros</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Management of thyroid cancer: United kingdom national multidisciplinary guidelines</article-title>. <source>J Laryngol Otol</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>130</volume>(<issue>S2</issue>):<page-range>S150&#x2013;s60</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0022215116000578</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Machado</surname> <given-names>MR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tavares</surname> <given-names>MR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buchpiguel</surname> <given-names>CA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chammas</surname> <given-names>MC</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Ultrasonographic evaluation of cervical lymph nodes in thyroid cancer</article-title>. <source>Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>156</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<page-range>263&#x2013;71</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/0194599816676472</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rixiati</surname> <given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Inclusion of the number of metastatic lymph nodes in the staging system for medullary thyroid cancer: Validating a modified American joint committee on cancer tumor-Node-Metastasis staging system</article-title>. <source>Thyroid</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>32</volume>(<issue>5</issue>):<page-range>536&#x2013;43</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/thy.2021.0571</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cranshaw</surname> <given-names>IM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carnaille</surname> <given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Micrometastases in thyroid cancer</article-title>. <source>import. finding? Surg Oncol</source> (<year>2008</year>) <volume>17</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<page-range>253&#x2013;8</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.suronc.2008.04.005</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>YM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Park</surname> <given-names>JH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cho</surname> <given-names>JW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hong</surname> <given-names>SJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yoon</surname> <given-names>JH</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The definition of lymph node micrometastases in pathologic N1a papillary thyroid carcinoma should be revised</article-title>. <source>Surgery</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>165</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<page-range>652&#x2013;6</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.surg.2018.09.015</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<label>25</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schlumberger</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leboulleux</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Current practice in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer</article-title>. <source>Nat Rev Endocrinol</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>17</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<page-range>176&#x2013;88</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41574-020-00448-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<label>26</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>You</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>The effect of prophylactic central neck dissection on locoregional recurrence in papillary thyroid cancer after total thyroidectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis : pCND for the locoregional recurrence of papillary thyroid cancer</article-title>. <source>Ann Surg Oncol</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>24</volume>(<issue>8</issue>):<page-range>2189&#x2013;98</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1245/s10434-016-5691-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<label>27</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Eltelety</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Terris</surname> <given-names>DJ</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Neck dissection in the surgical treatment of thyroid cancer</article-title>. <source>Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>48</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<page-range>143&#x2013;51</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecl.2018.11.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<label>28</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jayasekara</surname> <given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jonker</surname> <given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>JF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Engelsman</surname> <given-names>AF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wong</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kruijff</surname> <given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Early postoperative stimulated serum thyroglobulin quantifies risk of recurrence in papillary thyroid cancer</article-title>. <source>Surgery</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>167</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<page-range>40&#x2013;5</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.surg.2019.06.048</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<label>29</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sapuppo</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tavarelli</surname> <given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Belfiore</surname> <given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vigneri</surname> <given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pellegriti</surname> <given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Time to separate persistent from recurrent differentiated thyroid cancer: Different conditions with different outcomes</article-title>. <source>J Clin Endocrinol Metab</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>104</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<page-range>258&#x2013;65</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1210/jc.2018-01383</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<label>30</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>JE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Al-Attar</surname> <given-names>NC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>OH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shaughness</surname> <given-names>GG</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rosculet</surname> <given-names>NP</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Avram</surname> <given-names>AM</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Location and causation of residual lymph node metastasis after surgical treatment of regionally advanced differentiated thyroid cancer</article-title>. <source>Thyroid</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>28</volume>(<issue>5</issue>):<fpage>593</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>600</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/thy.2017.0434</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<label>31</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bates</surname> <given-names>MF</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lamas</surname> <given-names>MR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Randle</surname> <given-names>RW</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Long</surname> <given-names>KL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pitt</surname> <given-names>SC</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schneider</surname> <given-names>DF</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. <article-title>Back so soon? is early recurrence of papillary thyroid cancer really just persistent disease</article-title>? <source>Surgery</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>163</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<page-range>118&#x2013;23</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.surg.2017.05.028</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>