Abstract
Polydopamine-derived carbon materials have attracted tremendous attention owing to nitrogen heteroatom doping. However, it is challenging to estimate the effect of the morphology and porosity of the polydopamine-derived carbon for lithium storage. Here, we designed three polydopamine-derived carbon materials with different morphologies and porosity: carbon nanospheres (CNs), mesoporous carbon nanospheres (MCNs), and bowl-like mesoporous carbon nanoparticles (BMCNs) to evaluate the electrochemical performance. Such a bowl-like mesoporous structure combines multiple advantageous features, including mesoporous channels and shorter transmission distance, thus delivering a high specific capacity. In addition, our work provides new insight into the electrochemical performance of polydopamine-derived carbon and a useful reference for its future application in high-performance lithium ion battery (LIB) electrode materials.
Introduction
With increasing aggravation of energy crisis and environment pollution, the development of an environmentally friendly new energy to replace traditional fossil energy is essential for building a sustainable energy structure and a friendly eco-environment. Lithium ion batteries (LIBs) are the most competitive candidates of energy storage systems (ESS) and have a wide application in portable electronic devices and electric vehicles (; ; ; ; Zhu et al., 2019). However, graphitic carbon, as currently the standard commercial anode material for LIBs, possesses low theoretical capacity (372 mA h g–1) and undesirable rate performance, which limit its application in a high-energy system (; Zheng et al., 2019; ). Nitrogen-doped carbon nanomaterials have been widely explored as alternatives to commercial graphitic materials, showing high reversible capacity, high-rate performance, and high cyclic capability. A variety of nitrogen-doped carbon materials have been obtained by using urea (; ), polypyrrole (; ), polydopamine (; ), and biomass sources (; ; ) as precursors. Among these materials, polydopamine-derived carbon materials have been widely applied in the anode/cathode field due to that it can easily coat on virtually any surface by self-polymerization of dopamine in aqueous media. For instance, the Si@void@C “yolk-shell” structure was fabricated via a sacrificial template process, which delivered a high capacity of ∼1500 mA h g–1 at a current density of 1 A g–1 (). Wang and coworkers designed interconnected N/O co-doped porous rod-like nanocapsules (N/O-CNCs) through a sacrificial template process, and a capacity of 310 mA h g–1 was obtained at 30 A g–1 after 11000 cycles (). Recently, Mai and coworkers reported sandwich-structured mesoporous polydopamine (mPDA)/reduced graphene oxide (rGO) nanosheets and found that this composite electrode could display a high specific capacity (). In addition, compared with the traditional hollow structure, the bowl-like morphology has received extensive attention due to its unique structural advantages (; ). However, to the best of our knowledge, the influence of the morphology and porosity of the polydopamine-derived carbon for lithium storage have not been thoroughly evaluated as anode materials.
Herein, we have designed three polydopamine-derived carbon materials with different morphologies and porosities: carbon nanospheres (CNs), mesoporous carbon nanospheres (MCNs), and bowl-like mesoporous carbon nanoparticles (BMCNs). Importantly, the effect of the morphology and porosity of the polydopamine-derived carbon for lithium storage were evaluated in detail. We find that the mesoporous structure can shorten the diffusion path of Li ions and electrons in the electrode and accelerate the diffusion rate of the electrolyte. In addition, the bowl-like morphology has a shorter transmission distance than nanospheres, which can shorten the lithium ion and electron transmission paths. Therefore, BMCNs combine the advantages of both mesoporous channels and shorter transmission distance so that it can effectively relieve the stress contributing to superior long-term cycling stability. The obtained BMCN electrode delivers a large reversible capacity of 300 mA h g–1 after 1000 cycles, revealing outstanding long-term cycle stability at 2 C.
Results and Discussion
The overall fabrication process for CNs, MCNs, and BMCNs is schematically illustrated in Figure 1a. First, CNs were synthesized by the polymerization of dopamine hydrochloride (DA) under the condition of basic aerobic conditions using ammonia as a catalyst. Second, the low-block copolymer F127 is used as the template, DA as the carbon source. TMB acts as the medium in the ethanol/water system, which interacts with the hydrophobic PPO segment of F127 and DA molecules, respectively. This promotes the formation of F127/TMB/DA composite micelles. Continuous cooperative assembly promotes the formation of the initially formed composite micelles along the particle interior to form mesopores. The polymerization reaction under oxygen conditions continues to grow, and finally MCNs were formed by carbonization treatment in an N2 atmosphere. Third, TMB was ultrasonically transformed into an emulsion to form an “oil-in-water” system. A block copolymer F127/TMB/DA composite micelle is formed at the TMB/water interface; this seed-mediated anisotropic growth process yields BMCNs. The color changes of the synthesis process are shown in Supplementary Figure S1.
FIGURE 1
The SEM image (Figure 1b) and TEM images (Figure 1c and Supplementary Figure S2) show that CNs have particle sizes between 200 and 500 nm and cross-linked with each other; the surface is smooth, and no mesoporous channels are observed. MCNs obtained are very uniform with an average size of about 200 nm, and the ultrasmall mesopores are distributed on the sphere surface (Figures 1d,e and Supplementary Figure S3). The SEM image (Figure 1f) and TEM images (Figure 1g and Supplementary Figure S4) show that BMCNs clearly display a bowl-like structure with an even particle diameter of ∼250 nm, and uniform mesopores can be distinctly observed.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns (Supplementary Figure S5) of the three samples suggest that two broad peaks at about 23.5° and 43.7° were assigned to partly graphitized (002) and quasi-amorphous (100) structure diffraction modes (; ). The Raman spectra of CNs, MCNs, and BMCNs are shown in Supplementary Figure S6. It is known that the two characteristic peaks located at ∼1350 and ∼1590 cm–1 correspond to disordered sp3 carbon (D band) and graphitic sp2 carbon (G band), respectively (; ). In addition, the intensity ratios of D and G bands (ID/IG) for CNs, MCNs, and BMCNs are 1.03, 1.04, and 1.05, respectively, indicating a relatively superior graphitic degree.
The chemical composition and electronic structure of the three samples were analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Figure 2A presents three typical peaks of C1s, N1s, and O1s without any impurities in three samples. The spectrum of C 1s exhibits that the primary characteristic peaks at 284.6, 285.9, and 289.1 eV denote the C–C, C–N, and O–C=O of CNs, MCNs, and BMCNs (Figure 2B), respectively (Zheng et al., 2014; ; ). Four obvious peaks of N 1s at 398.4, 399.7, 400.6, and 402.4 eV are related to pyridinic N, pyrrolic N, graphitic N, and oxidized N in Figure 2C (; ; ). The doping of nitrogen is conducive to enhancement of the electrochemical activity and conductivity of the material (; ; ). Moreover, the atomic ratio in Figure 2D presents that the proportions of the three elements C, N, and O of CNs, MCNs, and BMCNs are basically the same. The above results indicate that the phase composition of CNs, MCNs, and BMCNs is identical, and there are only differences in pore size and morphology. The specific surface area and porosity distribution of MCNs and BMCNs were obtained from the N2 adsorption/desorption analysis. Figure 2E shows that both MCNs and BMCNs display representative type-IV isotherms with an evident hysteresis loop, indicating the presence of mesoporous structures (; ; ). The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller specific surface area of BMCNs was 44.2 m2 g–1, which was larger than that of MCNs (19.9 m2 g–1). As shown in Figure 2F, the pore size distribution curves calculated using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda model confirmed that the pore diameters of BMCNs are mainly distributed around 3.1 nm, which are larger than MCNs (2.2 nm). The results show that BMCNs have richer mesoporous channels, which will facilitate the contact between the active material and the electrolyte and accelerate Li+ and electron transport.
FIGURE 2
We investigated and compared the electrochemical properties of CNs, MCNs, and BMCNs as candidate anode materials for LIBs. The Li-ion reaction behavior of the three electrodes was tested via cyclic voltammograms (CVs), as exhibited in Figure 3A and Supplementary Figure S7. The 0.9-V peaks can correspond to the decomposition of the electrolyte followed by the formation of a solid electrolyte interface (SEI) layer (; ; ). The 0.01-V cathodic peak is ascribed to the intercalation and deintercalation of Li ions into graphene-like planes (; ; ). The galvanostatic discharge/charge curves of the BMCNs at 0.1 A g–1 are presented in Figure 3B. The BMCN electrode delivers high first-cycle discharge and charge capacities of 868 and 507 mA h g–1, respectively, suggesting an initial Coulombic efficiency (ICE) of 58.4%. The initial Coulombic efficiencies of CN and MCN samples are 61.4% and 55.3%, respectively. The irreversible capacity loss may be originated from the formation of an SEI layer during the first cycle and electrolyte decomposition (; Zou et al., 2018; ). Figure 3C shows the cycling performance of CNs, MCNs, and BMCNs at 0.1 A g–1. After 100 cycles, the BMCN electrode delivers a significant reversible capacity up to 371 mA h g–1. In stark contrast, CN and MCN electrodes can only deliver 277 and 171 mA h g–1 after 100 cycles, respectively. Discharge capacity and Coulombic efficiency of the first five cycles of CN, MCN, and BMCN electrodes are presented in Figure 3D. The BMCN electrode performs the best and delivers high discharge capacities. In addition, the Coulombic efficiency of the BMCN electrode is maintained at above 96% from the second cycle, which are superior to CNs and MCNs. The rate performance of CNs, MCNs, and BMCNs at various current densities ranging from 0.1 to 5 A g–1 is presented in Supplementary Figure S8. The BMCN electrode delivers reversible charge capacities of 448, 381, 339, 285, 243, and 184 mA h g–1 at current densities of 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 A g–1, respectively, which are superior to CNs and MCNs. When the current density returns from 5 to 0.1 A g–1, a high charge capacity of 425 mA h g–1 can be recovered. To better demonstrate the good lithium ion storage performance of BMCNs at high current densities, the long cycling performance was further investigated at 2 A g–1 (Figure 3E), the BMCN electrode which delivered a reversible capacity of 300 mA h g–1 is retained, and the Coulombic efficiency closes to 100% after 1000 cycles, indicating outstanding cycling stability over a long cycle life.
FIGURE 3
The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements of three samples were conducted after the 50th cycles. All Nyquist plots are composed of a semicircle at the medium frequencies and an inclined line in the low-frequency region. The equivalent circuit is fitted using the ZSimpWin software. In general, the semicircle at the medium frequencies can be assigned to the interfacial transfer impedance of electrons (RCT), and the slope spike denotes the diffusion ability of Li ions in the electrodes. Re represents the electrolyte resistance. The CPE (constant phase element) denotes the capacitance of the SEI films and the double-layer capacitance, and ZW is in relation with the Warburg impedance (; ; ). It can be observed that the semicircle of the BMCN electrode (Figure 4A) is smaller than other samples; this proves that the ion transport within the BMCN electrode is further ameliorated. The outstanding electrochemical performance of the BMCN electrode could be explained by the bowl-like mesoporous nanostructure (Figure 4B). Lithium ions can be stored reversibly between graphene-like planes. Comparing the electrochemical performance test results of CNs and MCNs indicates that the existence of mesoporous channels can provide convenient channels for lithium ions and electrons and accelerate the penetration of electrolytes, which can improve the electrochemical performance of electrodes. Differences in electrochemical performance between MCNs and BMCNs are mainly due to the unique advantages of the bowl-like morphology. In terms of geometry, this special bowl-like morphology has a shorter transmission distance than nanospheres, which can shorten the lithium ion and electron transmission paths.
FIGURE 4
In a nutshell, we successfully synthesized polydopamine-derived carbon materials with different porosities or morphologies using three different methods. BMCNs were synthesized by an emulsion-induced self-assembly strategy, and MCNs were prepared according to a general nano-emulsion assembly method. CNs were synthesized by self-polymerization. Importantly, the effects of porosity and morphology on their electrochemical performance under the same conditions were studied in detail. Electrochemical test results show that the mesoporous structure can shorten the diffusion path of Li+ and electrons in the electrode and accelerate the diffusion rate of the electrolyte. In addition, the special bowl-like morphology has a shorter transmission distance than nanospheres, which can shorten the lithium ion and electron transmission paths.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
XQ completed the experiments and test. FZ prepared the draft manuscript. YZ discussed the structures. KL and WL polished the manuscript. JY designed this manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was financially supported by the Fok Ying-Tong Education Foundation of China (No. 171041), the Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning, the State Key Laboratory for Modification of Chemical Fibers and Polymer Materials, Donghua University, and DHU Distinguished Young Professor Program and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenrg.2020.00140/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AiK.LiuY.RuanC.LuL.LuG. (2013). Sp2 C-dominant N-doped carbon sub-micrometer spheres with a tunable size: a versatile platform for highly efficient oxygen-reduction catalysts.Adv. Mater.25998–1003. 10.1002/adma.201203923
2
BoyjooY.ShiH.OlssonE.CaiQ.WuZ.-S.LiuJ.et al (2020). Molecular-level design of pyrrhotite electrocatalyst decorated hierarchical porous carbon spheres as nanoreactors for lithium–sulfur batteries.Adv. Energy Mater.10:2000651. 10.1002/aenm.202000651
3
ChenJ.MaoZ.ZhangL.TangY.WangD.BieL.et al (2018). Direct production of nitrogen-doped porous carbon from urea via magnesiothermic reduction.Carbon13041–47. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.12.125
4
ChenY.-Y.ZhangY.JiangW.-J.ZhangX.DaiZ.WanL.-J.et al (2016). Pomegranate-like N,P-Doped Mo2C@C nanospheres as highly active electrocatalysts for alkaline hydrogen evolution.ACS Nano108851–8860. 10.1021/acsnano.6b04725
5
ChuH.ShaoC.QiuS.ZouY.XiangC.XuF.et al (2018). Nitrogen-rich sandwich-like carbon nanosheets as anodes with superior lithium storage properties.Inorg. Chem.Front.5225–232. 10.1039/C7QI00567A
6
CuiY.ZhouX.GuoW.LiuY.LiT.FuY.et al (2019). Selenium nanocomposite cathode with long cycle life for rechargeable lithium-selenium batteries.Batt. Super.2784–791. 10.1002/batt.201900050
7
DaiX.-H.FanH.-X.ZhangJ.-J.YuanS.-J. (2019). Sewage sludge-derived porous hollow carbon nanospheres as high-performance anode material for lithium ion batteries.Electrochim. Acta319277–285. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.07.006
8
GayathriS.ArunkumarP.KimE. J.KimS.KangI.HanJ. H. (2019). Mesoporous nitrogen-doped carbon@graphene nanosheets as ultra-stable anode for lithium-ion batteries – Melamine as surface modifier than nitrogen source.Electrochim. Acta318290–301. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.06.054
9
HaoJ.WangY.ChiC.WangJ.GuoQ.YangY.et al (2018). Enhanced storage capability by biomass-derived porous carbon for lithium-ion and sodium-ion battery anodes.Sustain. Energy Fuels22358–2365. 10.1039/C8SE00353J
10
HongY.-S.ZhaoC.-Z.XiaoY.XuR.XuJ.-J.HuangJ.-Q.et al (2019). Safe lithium-metal anodes for Li-O2 batteries: from fundamental chemistry to advanced characterization and effective protection.Batt. Super.2638–658. 10.1002/batt.201900031
11
HuX.SunX.YooS. J.EvankoB.FanF.CaiS.et al (2019). Nitrogen-rich hierarchically porous carbon as a high-rate anode material with ultra-stable cyclability and high capacity for capacitive sodium-ion batteries.Nano Energy56828–839. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.11.081
12
JianZ.LiH.CaoR.ZhouH.XuH.ZhaoG.et al (2019). Polydopamine-coated hierarchical tower-shaped carbon for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries.Electrochim. Acta319359–365. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.06.145
13
JiangH.RenD.WangH.HuY.GuoS.YuanH.et al (2015). 2D monolayer MoS2–carbon interoverlapped superstructure: engineering ideal atomic interface for lithium ion storage.Adv. Mater.273687–3695. 10.1002/adma.201501059
14
LangJ.LiJ.ZhangF.DingX.ZapienJ. A.TangY. (2019). Sodium-ion hybrid battery combining an anion-intercalation cathode with an adsorption-type anode for enhanced rate and cycling performance.Batt. Super.2440–447. 10.1002/batt.201800138
15
LiL.ZhangW.WangX.ZhangS.LiuY.LiM.et al (2019). Hollow-carbon-templated few-layered V5S8 nanosheets enabling ultrafast potassium storage and long-term cycling.ACS Nano137939–7948. 10.1021/acsnano.9b02384
16
LiangJ.HuH.ParkH.XiaoC.DingS.PaikU.et al (2015). Construction of hybrid bowl-like structures by anchoring NiO nanosheets on flat carbon hollow particles with enhanced lithium storage properties.Energy Envion. Sci.81707–1711. 10.1039/C5EE01125F
17
LiuC.XiaoN.WangY.ZhouY.WangG.LiH.et al (2018). Electrospun nitrogen-doped carbon nanofibers with tuned microstructure and enhanced lithium storage properties.Carbon139716–724. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.07.019
18
LiuH.LiuX.LiW.GuoX.WangY.WangG.et al (2017). Porous carbon composites for next generation rechargeable lithium batteries.Adv. Energy Mater.7:1700283. 10.1002/aenm.201700283
19
LiuJ.WickramaratneN. P.QiaoS. Z.JaroniecM. (2015). Molecular-based design and emerging applications of nanoporous carbon spheres.Nat. Mater.14763–774. 10.1038/nmat4317
20
LiuJ.XuX.HuR.YangL.ZhuM. (2016). Uniform hierarchical Fe3O4@polypyrrole nanocages for superior lithium ion battery anodes.Adv. Energy Mater.6:1600256. 10.1002/aenm.201600256
21
LiuN.WuH.McDowellM. T.YaoY.WangC.CuiY. (2012). A yolk-shell design for stabilized and scalable Li-ion battery alloy anodes.Nano Lett.123315–3321. 10.1021/nl3014814
22
LiuS.MaoJ.ZhangQ.WangZ.PangW. K.ZhangL.et al (2020). An intrinsically non-flammable electrolyte for high-performance potassium batteries.Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.593638–3644. 10.1002/anie.201913174
23
MaoJ.ZhouT.ZhengY.GaoH.LiuH. K.GuoZ. (2018). Two-dimensional nanostructures for sodium-ion battery anodes.J. Mater. Chem. A63284–3303. 10.1039/C7TA10500B
24
NanJ.GuoX.XiaoJ.LiX.ChenW.WuW.et al (2019). Nanoengineering of 2D MXene-based materials for energy storage applications.Small 1902085.10.1002/smll.201902085[Epub ahead of print].
25
Ould ElyT.KamzabekD.ChakrabortyD. (2019). Batteries safety: recent progress and current challenges.Front. Energy Res.7:71. 10.3389/fenrg.2019.00071
26
PengL.HungC.-T.WangS.ZhangX.ZhuX.ZhaoZ.et al (2019). Versatile nanoemulsion assembly approach to synthesize functional mesoporous carbon nanospheres with tunable pore sizes and architectures.J. Am. Chem. Soc.1417073–7080. 10.1021/jacs.9b02091
27
QianX.ZhuG.WangK.ZhangF.LiangK.LuoW.et al (2020). Bowl-like mesoporous polymer-induced interface growth of molybdenum disulfide for stable lithium storage.Chem. Eng. J.381:122651. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122651
28
QieL.ChenW.-M.WangZ.-H.ShaoQ.-G.LiX.YuanL.-X.et al (2012). Nitrogen-doped porous carbon nanofiber webs as anodes for lithium ion batteries with a superhigh capacity and rate capability.Adv. Mater.242047–2050. 10.1002/adma.201104634
29
RaoX.LouY.ChenJ.LuH.ChengB.WangW.et al (2020). Polyacrylonitrile hard carbon as anode of high rate capability for lithium ion batteries.Front. Energy Res.8:3. 10.3389/fenrg.2020.00003
30
ShenS.XiaX.ZhongY.DengS.XieD.LiuB.et al (2019). Implanting niobium carbide into trichoderma spore carbon: a new advanced host for sulfur cathodes.Adv. Mater.31:1900009. 10.1002/adma.201900009
31
ShiM.NieP.FanZ.FuR.FangS.DouH.et al (2020). Tubular graphene nano-scroll coated silicon for high rate performance lithium-ion battery.Front. Energy Res.8:2. 10.3389/fenrg.2020.00002
32
SunG.ZhangF.XieQ.LuoW.YangJ. (2019). Regulating ambient pressure approach to graphitic carbon nitride towards dispersive layers and rich pyridinic nitrogen.Chin. Chem. Lett.10.1016/j.cclet.2019.10.018[Epub ahead of print].
33
TarasconJ. M.ArmandM. (2001). Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries.Nature414359–367. 10.1038/35104644
34
TianH.LiangJ.LiuJ. (2019). Nanoengineering carbon spheres as nanoreactors for sustainable energy applications.Adv. Mater.31:1903886. 10.1002/adma.201903886
35
WangL.LuB.WangS.ChengW.ZhaoY.ZhangJ.et al (2019). Ultra-high performance of Li/Na ion batteries using N/O dual dopant porous hollow carbon nanocapsules as an anode.J. Mater. Chem. A711117–11126. 10.1039/C8TA12540F
36
WangN.HouD.LiQ.ZhangP.WeiH.MaiY. (2019). Two-dimensional interface engineering of mesoporous polydopamine on graphene for novel organic cathodes.ACS Appl. Energy Mater.25816–5823. 10.1021/acsaem.9b00946
37
WangZ.QiangH.ZhuZ.LiuJ.ChenC.ZhangD. (2018). Facile synthesis of nitrogen-doped mesoporous hollow carbon nanospheres for high-performance supercapacitors.ChemElectroChem52242–2249. 10.1002/celc.201800597
38
WuJ.CaoY.ZhaoH.MaoJ.GuoZ. (2019). The critical role of carbon in marrying silicon and graphite anodes for high-energy lithium-ion batteries.Carbon Energy157–76. 10.1002/cey2.2
39
XuB.QiS.JinM.CaiX.LaiL.SunZ.et al (2019). 2020 roadmap on two-dimensional materials for energy storage and conversion.Chin. Chem. Lett.302053–2064. 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.10.028
40
YinD.ZhaoH.LiN.SiR.SunX.LiX.et al (2019). Enhancing the rate capability of niobium oxide electrode through rare-earth doping engineering.Batt. Super.2924–928. 10.1002/batt.201900069
41
ZhangF.ZhuG.WangK.QianX.ZhaoY.LuoW.et al (2019). Boosting the initial coulombic efficiency in silicon anodes through interfacial incorporation of metal nanocrystals.J. Mater. Chem. A717426–17434. 10.1039/C9TA05340A
42
ZhangL.SunD.KangJ.FengJ.BechtelH. A.WangL.-W.et al (2018). Electrochemical reaction mechanism of the MoS2 electrode in a lithium-ion cell revealed by in situ and operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy.Nano Lett.181466–1475. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b05246
43
ZhaoQ.MengY.LiJ.XiaoD. (2019). Sulfur and nitrogen dual-doped porous carbon nanosheet anode for sodium ion storage with a self-template and self-porogen method.Appl. Surface Sci.481473–483. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.03.143
44
ZhengC.HuX.SunX.YooS. J.LiX. (2019). Large-scale synthesis of nitrogen-rich hierarchically porous carbon as anode for lithium-ion batteries with high capacity and rate capability.Electrochim. Acta306339–349. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.137
45
ZhengF.YangY.ChenQ. (2014). High lithium anodic performance of highly nitrogen-doped porous carbon prepared from a metal-organic framework.Nat. Communi.5:5261. 10.1038/ncomms6261
46
ZhuG.ZhangF.LiX.LuoW.LiL.ZhangH.et al (2019). Engineering the distribution of carbon in silicon oxide nanospheres at the atomic level for highly stable anodes.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.586669–6673. 10.1002/anie.201902083
47
ZouG.HouH.FosterC. W.BanksC. E.GuoT.JiangY.et al (2018). Advanced hierarchical vesicular carbon co-doped with S, P, N for high-rate sodium storage.Adv. Sci.5:1800241. 10.1002/advs.201800241
Summary
Keywords
polydopamine, porous carbon, mesoporous structure, morphology, lithium storage
Citation
Qian X, Zhang F, Zhao Y, Liang K, Luo W and Yang J (2020) Polydopamine-Derived Carbon: What a Critical Role for Lithium Storage?. Front. Energy Res. 8:140. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2020.00140
Received
28 April 2020
Accepted
09 June 2020
Published
21 July 2020
Volume
8 - 2020
Edited by
Jianfeng Mao, University of Wollongong, Australia
Reviewed by
Hao Liu, University of Technology Sydney, Australia; Xiayin Yao, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology & Engineering, CAS, China; Wei Li, Fudan University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Qian, Zhang, Zhao, Liang, Luo and Yang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kai Liang, Kliang@dhu.edu.cnWei Luo, wluo@dhu.edu.cnJianping Yang, jianpingyang@dhu.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage, a section of the journal Frontiers in Energy Research
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.