Abstract
In soils, various solid silica (Si) species exhibit different weathering behaviors and surface reactivities, which are among other characteristics related to the crystallinity of the silicate tetrahedral network. Amorphous species exhibit faster weathering and generally possess a larger specific surface area in comparison to crystalline species. However, the characterization of these different species is commonly based on wet chemical extraction methods, which lack selectivity. While Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) in the mid-infrared range can differentiate between short-range ordered aluminosilicates (SROAS) and pure amorphous silica (ASi), few systematic studies are found on the IR spectral features that distinguish solid Si species by crystallinity. This study aims to identify FTIR absorption bands that can differentiate Si species based on their crystallinity. Our data clearly indicate that ASi can be distinguished from very crystalline silica (quartz) and sea sand. The absorption band at approximately 800 cm−1 in the FTIR spectra allows determining the degree of crystallinity of the studied ASi species since the band becomes smaller and the band maximum shifted toward lower wavenumbers with increasing degree of crystallinity. Hence, FTIR spectra may be used to differentiate certain Si species in complex samples like soils, allowing the estimation of weatherability and surface reactivity of those species.
1 Introduction
Growing evidence suggests that silica (Si) can have a significant impact on ecosystem processes such as nutrient availability, water retention (), and crop productivity (; ), as well as ecological cycles (). However, for those effects, several forms of Si are relevant. In terrestrial environments, silicon occurs in a variety of solid compounds including crystalline minerals (e.g., quartz and feldspars), short-range ordered species (e.g., imogolite and allophanic minerals), and amorphous silica of biogenic or minerogenic origin. The weathering of these solids releases dissolved silicon into the solution and strongly differs between these minerals (). In solution, silicon exists in a dynamic equilibrium of monomeric and polymeric silicic acid controlled by solution pH, silicic acid concentration, and ionic strength of the solution (). The differences in weatherability among various forms of silica, originating from factors such as crystallinity and specific surface area, necessitate their distinct identification in terrestrial samples. Therefore, analytical methods are required to characterize Si species that differ in crystallinity and potentially enable quantification. However, the common analytical methods that are based on wet chemical extraction procedures are not entirely selective, and thus an exclusive quantification of the target Si species alone remains elusive (). The term crystallinity is used to describe the degree of regularity of the silicate tetrahedron network (regular and periodic arrangement). The crystallinity increases from amorphous via short- toward long-range ordered silicates ().
More recently, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analyses were successfully applied to distinguish between short-range ordered aluminosilicates (SROAS) and pure amorphous silica (ASi) (). Other studies indicate the difference between quartz sand and ASi like glasses (; ), the latter by using Raman spectroscopy. Additionally, interpreted FTIR data by using energy-loss functions to determine crystal symmetry-based vibrational modes of ASi species and quartz. However, few systematic studies are found on the relation between infrared (IR) spectral features and how they can be used to differentiate between solid Si species differing in the crystallinity of the Si tetrahedral network.
In the SiO4 tetrahedron (Figure 1A), various stretching and bending modes can be excited by infrared light. These modes can roughly be distinguished into bond compression/extension (Figures 1B–D) modes and bond angle deflection modes [Figures 1E, F; ; ], which can appear asymmetric or symmetric.
FIGURE 1
If SiO4 tetrahedrons are part of a larger Si network comprising irregular or regular arrangements of the Si tetrahedral units, slightly different energies are required for the valence/deformation vibrations induced by IR light (
FTIR spectra of minerals like opal and quartz as well as those of volcanic glasses like obsidian showed specific absorption bands reflecting differences in the crystallinity of the Si species (
TABLE 1
| WN region; cm−1 | Assigned group | Remark |
|---|---|---|
| 1,200 to 1000 | ν Si-O: internal Si-O/asymmetric stretching | Most intense band |
| 1,088 | For quartz | |
| 1,100 | For opal (i.e., hydrated amorphous form of silica) | |
| 1,040–1,110 | For glasses | |
| 500–450 | δ Si-O: internal O-Si-O bending | Varies with crystallinity ( |
| 800–740 | ν Si-O-Si: intra Si-O-Si/symmetric stretching | Si-O-Si bonding angle varies significantly with the degree of crystallinity ( |
| 800–790 | For soil minerals | |
| 769–745 | For glasses | |
| 620 & 385 two bands | δ Si-Ocrist: Si-O-Si in cristobalite | Missing in spectra of opals ( |
| 797 & 778 one band with two maxima | δ Si-Oquartz: Si-O-Si in quartz |
Assignment of the absorption bands in the WN region from 1,200 to 400 cm−1 in FTIR spectra of different silica, glasses, and soil minerals toward defined stretching and bending modes. The bold letters indicate the WN range of each band in total, and the normal letters indicate the WN range of that band for specific Si species (like glasses).
In this study, we aimed to identify specific absorption bands in FTIR spectra that can differentiate between Si species with different degrees of crystallinity.
2 Material and methods
2.1 Fourier transform infrared analyses
The Sipernat 320 and Aerosil 300 samples were used as provided by the manufacturer (white powders with particle sizes between 2 and 10 µm). These commercially amorphous silicas were chosen as they are derived from different types of synthesis. Given their relatively high specific surface area, these materials may also serve as a potential source of silicon in soil when used as a fertilizer. All samples (Table 2) were gently ground by hand in an agate mortar for approximately 5 min to obtain a powder (particle sizes between 2 and approximately 10 µm) and subsequently analyzed using an IS20 FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Dreieich, Germany). Briefly, 2 mg of the sample (quartz, sea sand, and mixtures of quartz with ASi) was mixed with 98 mg of KBr and finely ground by hand in an agate mortar. The mixtures were dried for 12 h over silica gel in a desiccator to standardize the water content and were then pressed into pellets. The obtained KBr pellets of the minerals were analyzed in the transmission mode. All spectra were recorded in three replicates at a resolution of 1 cm−1 and 16 scans [=16 repetitions of a single spectra;
TABLE 2
| Si-O species | Description | SSA (BET) | pH/SiO2 | Lost | SiO2 | Origin/references |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | m2 g−1 | -/% | % | % | - | |
| Quartz sand (ground <10 µm) | Crystalline silica; SiO2 | 3.5A | 6.5/20 | <4 | >90 | Quartzwerke Weferlingen, Germany ( |
| Sea sand (ground <10 µm) | Heated crystalline silica; SiO2 | 3.5A | 6.5/20 | <4 | >90 | Roth, Germany |
| Silica gel (ground <10 µm) | Pyrogenic silica; SiO2 | 750–800B | - | <4 | >90 | Merck, Germany ( |
| Amorphous silica | ||||||
| Sipernat 320 | Precipitated silica, SiO2 | 180 | 6.2/4% | <7 | 97 | Evonik |
| Aerosil 300 | Pyrogenic silica; SiO2 | 270–330 | 3.7–4.5/4% | 1.5 | 99.8 | Evonik |
| Phytolite | Biogenic silica; SiO2 | 290–400 | 6/4% | <2 | >90 | |
Silica studied by FTIR spectroscopy (own measurements), their description, specific surface area (SSA, m2 g−1), pH values of suspension in water (pH/% silica per 100 mL of water), weight loss on drying at 105°C for 2 h (loss; %), and SiO2 content (SiO2; %) as well as origin or reference.
2.2 Interpretation of FTIR spectra
The baseline-corrected spectra (
In FTIR spectra of soil samples, the band at WN 3700 to 3,000 cm−1 is affected by OH groups of different soil constituents (e.g., oxides/hydroxides of iron or manganese, water, clay mineral, and organic matter). The bands of the different OH groups are overlapping and are affected by the formation of hydrogen bridges (
3 Results and discussion
Our data clearly demonstrate that FTIR spectroscopy can be used effectively to differentiate between crystalline silica, such as quartz, and amorphous silica. The FTIR spectra of the finely ground quartz sand (QS) (red line in Figure 2) are in accordance with the one published by
FIGURE 2

WN 1,300 to 400 cm−1 in FTIR spectra of finely ground quartz, synth. Cristobalite (Christob)*, biotic Opal CT (Biot. Opal)*, Baudres Opal (Baud. Opal)*, Libyan desert glass (Lib. Glass)*, and biogenic amorphous silica (bASi)*, (B) WN region 900 to 420 cm−1 in FTIR of quartz (QS enlarged region of (A): reddish line at the top), compared to spectra of QS and Chalcedony shown earlier by
Note that the FTIR of sea sand (SeaS; Roth company; Figure 3A: gray line) as well as the silica gel and the phytolith did not show the double band at approximately 799 cm−1 which was found in the FTIR of QS. Additionally, the WN of the ν-Si-O band maximum found for QS (1,088 cm−1) is shifted by approximately 20 cm−1 to higher WN for the SeaS (1,115 cm−1; Figure 3A and Table 3).
FIGURE 3

FTIR in the WN region from 2,000 to 400 cm−1 of finely ground quartz sand (Quarzwerke Weferlingen, Germany) compared with (A) silica gel, a phytolith (
TABLE 3
| ν Si-O | δ Si-O-H | ν Si-O-Si | δ Si-O | References | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeaS-RE | 1,115 | 912 | 800 | - | 460 | Own findings | ||
| Quartz; <20 µm | 1,169 | 1,084 | 794 | 778 | 693 | 460 | Own findings | |
| Quartz | 1,088 | 799 | 780 | 694 | 464 | |||
| Cristobalite | 1,099 | 802 | 621 | |||||
| Biot opal/OPAL-CT | 1,103 | 791 | 475 | |||||
| Phytolith | 1,100 | 960 | 793 | 469 | ||||
| Baudres OPAL-CT | 1,099 | 794 | 475 | |||||
| Opal-A | 1,096 | 800 | 470 | |||||
| Synth Cristobalite | 1,089 | 797 | 487 | |||||
| OPAL | 1,116 | 780 | ||||||
| Chalcedony | 800 | 780 | ||||||
| Desert glass | 1,102 | 806 | 472 | |||||
| Obsidian | 1,088 | |||||||
| Silica gel | 1,154 | 1,096 | 984 | 804 | Own findings | |||
| Sipernat 320 | 1,090 | 962 | 799 | 465 | Own findings | |||
| Aerosil 300 | 1,169 | 1,097 | 805 | 465 | Own findings | |||
| BaSi (phytolith) | 1,100 | 800 | 468 | Own findings | ||||
| Quartz + phytolith | 1,169 | 1,090 | 794 | 774 | 688 | 510 | Own findings | |
WN (cm−1) of absorption bands in FTIR of opal, quartz, obsidian, and chalcedony (from
This finding suggests that the crystallinity of SeaS (Roth) differs from that of QS, potentially due to the pretreatment process applied to SeaS. The SeaS was treated with HCl to remove carbonates and heated to 1,000°C to eliminate organic matter. This heating, in particular, may alter the structural arrangement of the SiO₄ units in this sand, leading to a more glass-like structure. This assumption is in accordance to the fact that the FTIR spectra of the SeaS are relatively similar to those of the Libyan desert glass (Figure 2, greenish line) shown by
FIGURE 4

Wavenumber region from 1,800 to 400 cm−1 in FTIR spectra of a phytolith (
To provide the context for the recorded spectra of silica in comparison with soil samples, we incorporated the spectra of two distinct soils shown in Figure 3B. The spectra of these soil samples also display the characteristic double band at a wavenumber of approximately 799 cm⁻1, albeit with reduced intensity. This attenuation can be attributed not only to the presence of quartz but also to organic matter and other inorganic components within the soil, which interfere with and diminish the strength of the target signal (
According to
The differences in the intensity of the band at approximately 800 cm−1 (Figures 3A, 4) are in accordance with
Our data of amorphous inorganic silica fit into this sequence. The band at approximately 1,600 cm−1 in FTIR of Sipernat 300 (Figure 4) and phytolith (Figure 4) indicates the presence of water within the crystalline structure of these samples, caused by synthesis: precipitation in aqueous solution. The WN of the δ Si-O-Si band maxima in the spectra of Sipernat and Aerosil (799–805 cm−1) are in a similar range as that of bASi (800 cm−1; Table 3), suggesting similarities in the crystallinity.
Differences in the band intensities (Y-axis) indicate in general differences in the contents of the respective functional groups but are also affected by an extinction coefficient which is characteristic for the studied components [Lambert–Beers law;
FIGURE 5

(A) FTIR at WN 850 to 400 cm−1 of quartz, Sipernat, and 1:1 as well as 1:2 phytolith and quartz-phytolith mixtures (dotted lines) showing the δ Si-Ophyt and δ Si-Oquartz bands with their intensities relative to that of the ν Si-O band at 1,100 cm−1 and (B) height of those bands relative to that of the ν-Si-O band.
For this alternative, the heights of the ν Si-O and ν Si-O-Si (quartz) band maxima can be calculated as a measure of the band intensity using IR analytical software (e.g., Bio-Rad Winirez Bio-Rad Corp., Krefeld, Germany). Specifically, the height of the band maxima for these bands is measured as the vertical distance from the peak of the band to the global baseline (
4 Conclusion
FTIR serves as a powerful method to distinguish silica species based on their crystallinity. Our findings demonstrate that FTIR can effectively identify distinct spectral features associated with amorphous and crystalline silica, highlighting the relationship between silica structure and its spectral profile. The non-destructive nature of FTIR offers significant advantages over traditional wet chemical methods, allowing for accurate and repeated analyses of silica samples. This capability is particularly valuable in soil science, where understanding the silica composition is essential for assessing soil health and ecological responses. In this study, we focused on the qualitative analysis of silica species and their crystallinity using FTIR. While our findings provide a solid foundation for distinguishing between amorphous and crystalline silica, future research is needed to explore the quantitative aspects of silica analysis. Establishing reliable quantification methods will enhance our understanding of the abundance and distribution of different silica forms in various matrices. Moreover, it remains unclear whether silica can be accurately quantified in complex samples such as soil. The interactions of silica with other soil components may complicate the quantification process.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
RE: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. MS: Conceptualization, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. JS: Conceptualization, Writing–review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The study received no funding.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
BanerjeeA. (1993). Notizen: investigation of the crystallinity of the modifications of silica by their IR-reflectance spectra. Z. für Naturforsch. A48, 741–742. 10.1515/zna-1993-5-630
2
ChristyA. A. (2008). Quantitative determination of surface area of silica gel particles by near infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Aspects322, 248–252. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.03.021
3
DGUV-213-582-2016 (2015). “Method for the determination of quartz and cristobalite [air monitoring methods, 2015],” in Pages 401-436 the MAK-collection for occupational health and safety: annual thresholds and classifications for the workplace (Weinheim, Germany: WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA).
4
DietzelM. (2002). “Interaction of polysilicic and monosilicic acid with mineral surfaces,” in Water-rock interaction. Editors StoberI.BucherK. (Netherlands, Dordrecht: Springer), 207–235.
5
EllerbrockR.HöhnA.RogasikJ. (1999). Functional analysis of soil organic matter as affected by long‐term manurial treatment. Eur. J. Soil Sci.50, 65–71. 10.1046/j.1365-2389.1999.00206.x
6
EllerbrockR.SteinM.SchallerJ. (2022). Comparing amorphous silica, short-range-ordered silicates and silicic acid species by FTIR. Sci. Rep.12, 11708. 10.1038/s41598-022-15882-4
7
EllerbrockR. H.GerkeH. H.DeumlichD. (2016). Soil organic matter composition along a slope in an erosion-affected arable landscape in North East Germany. Soil Tillage Res.156, 209–218. 10.1016/j.still.2015.08.014
8
FarmerV. C. (1974). The infrared spectra of minerals. Mineral. Soc. Monogr.4, 331–363.
9
FröhlichF. (2020). The opal-CT nanostructure. J. Non-Crystalline Solids533, 119938. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.119938
10
GottwaldW.WachterG. (1997) “IR spectroscopy for practicioners,” in German: IR Spektroskopie für Anwender. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley VCH.
11
GucsikA.KoeberlC.BrandstätterF.LibowitzkyE.ZhangM. (2004). Infrared, Raman, and cathodoluminescence studies of impact glasses. Meteorit. and Planet. Sci.39, 1273–1285. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00946.x
12
GundeM. K. (2000). Vibrational modes in amorphous silicon dioxide. Phys. B Condens. Matter292, 286–295. 10.1016/s0921-4526(00)00475-0
13
HaberhauerG.GerzabekM. (1999). Drift and transmission FT-IR spectroscopy of forest soils: an approach to determine decomposition processes of forest litter. Vib. Spectrosc.19, 413–417. 10.1016/s0924-2031(98)00046-0
14
Hernández-OrtizM.Hernández-PadrónG.BernalR.Cruz-VázquezC.CastanoV. (2015). Nanocrystalline mimetic opals: synthesis and comparative characterization vs. natural stones. Int. J. Basic Appl. Sci.4, 238–243. 10.14419/ijbas.v4i2.4174
15
HesseM.MeierH.ZeehB. (2005). Spektroskopische Methoden in der organischen Chemie. Georg Thieme Verlag.
16
IchikawaA.VolpatoJ.O’DonnellG. E.MazereeuwM. (2022). Comparison of the analysis of respirable crystalline silica in workplace air by direct-on-filter methods using X-ray diffraction and fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Ann. Work Expo. Health66, 632–643. 10.1093/annweh/wxab094
17
JiJ.GeY.BalsamW.DamuthJ. E.ChenJ. (2009). Rapid identification of dolomite using a Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrophotometer (FTIR): a fast method for identifying Heinrich events in IODP Site U1308. Mar. Geol.258, 60–68. 10.1016/j.margeo.2008.11.007
18
KaiserM.EllerbrockR.GerkeH. (2008). Cation exchange capacity and composition of soluble soil organic matter fractions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.72, 1278–1285. 10.2136/sssaj2007.0340
19
KaiserM.ZedererD. P.EllerbrockR. H.SommerM.LudwigB. (2016). Effects of mineral characteristics on content, composition, and stability of organic matter fractions separated from seven forest topsoils of different pedogenesis. Geoderma263, 1–7. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.029
20
KatzO.PuppeD.KaczorekD.PrakashN. B.SchallerJ. (2021). Silicon in the soil–plant continuum: intricate feedback mechanisms within ecosystems. Plants10, 652. 10.3390/plants10040652
21
LaudisioG.CatauroM.CostantiniA.BrandaF. (1998). Sol–gel preparation and crystallisation of 2.5 CaO· 2SiO2 glassy powders. Thermochim. Acta322, 17–23. 10.1016/s0040-6031(98)00487-0
22
LiuH.KayaH.LinY. T.OgrincA.KimS. H. (2022). Vibrational spectroscopy analysis of silica and silicate glass networks. J. Am. Ceram. Soc.105, 2355–2384. 10.1111/jace.18206
23
McMillanP. F.PiriouB. (1983). Raman spectroscopic studies of silicate and related glass structure: a review. Bull. Mineral.106, 57–75. 10.3406/bulmi.1983.7668
24
MeloniP.CarcangiuG.DeloguF. (2012). Specific surface area and chemical reactivity of quartz powders during mechanical processing. Mater. Res. Bull.47, 146–151. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2011.09.014
25
PuppeD.LeueM. (2018). Physicochemical surface properties of different biogenic silicon structures: results from spectroscopic and microscopic analyses of protistic and phytogenic silica. Geoderma330, 212–220. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.06.001
26
RenX.ZhangW.YeJ. (2017). FTIR study on the polymorphic structure of tricalcium silicate. Cem. Concr. Res.99, 129–136. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.11.021
27
SchallerJ.CramerA.CarminatiA.ZarebanadkoukiM. (2020). Biogenic amorphous silica as main driver for plant available water in soils. Sci. Rep.10, 2424. 10.1038/s41598-020-59437-x
28
SchallerJ.MacaggaR.KaczorekD.AugustinJ.BarkuskyD.SommerM.et al (2023). Increased wheat yield and soil C stocks after silica fertilization at the field scale. Sci. Total Environ.887, 163986. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163986
29
SchallerJ.PuppeD.KaczorekD.EllerbrockR.SommerM. (2021). Silicon cycling in soils revisited. Plants10, 295. 10.3390/plants10020295
30
ŠimonI.McMahonH. (1953). Study of the structure of quartz, cristobalite, and vitreous silica by reflection in infrared. J. Chem. Phys.21, 23–30. 10.1063/1.1698615
31
SteinM.GeorgiadisA.GudatD.RennertT. (2020). Formation and properties of inorganic Si-contaminant compounds. Environ. Pollut.265, 115032. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115032
32
SteinM.PuppeD.KaczorekD.BuhtzC.SchallerJ. (2024). Silicon extraction from x-ray amorphous soil constituents: a method comparison of alkaline extracting agents. Front. Environ. Sci.12. 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1389022
33
Van der MarelH. W.BeutelspacherH. (1976). Atlas of infrared spectroscopy of clay minerals and their admixtures. Elsevier Publishing Company.
34
WilsonM. (2014). The structure of opal-CT revisited. J. Non-Crystalline Solids405, 68–75. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.08.052
Summary
Keywords
FTIR, amorphous silica, minerals, crystallinity, short-range ordered aluminosilicates, analysis of soil composition, soil silicon
Citation
Ellerbrock RH, Stein M and Schaller J (2024) Comparing silicon mineral species of different crystallinity using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Front. Environ. Chem. 5:1462678. doi: 10.3389/fenvc.2024.1462678
Received
11 July 2024
Accepted
07 October 2024
Published
23 October 2024
Volume
5 - 2024
Edited by
Zimin Li, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China
Reviewed by
Claudio Imparato, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
Xiaodong Zhang, Tianjin University, China
Xiaomin Yang, Guizhou University, China
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2024 Ellerbrock, Stein and Schaller.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jörg Schaller, Joerg.Schaller@zalf.de
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.