<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Environ. Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Environmental Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Environ. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-665X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">803009</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fenvs.2022.803009</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Environmental Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>
<italic>Senegalia senegal</italic> (L.) Britton Response to Microbial and Manure Amendments for the Rehabilitation of Waste Rock Dumps in the Essakane Gold Mining Site, Burkina Faso</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Yonli et&#x20;al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">The Essakane Mining Site Rehabilitation</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yonli</surname>
<given-names>Hendi Hermann</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1344375/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Sene</surname>
<given-names>Godar</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1349502/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sanon</surname>
<given-names>Kadidia B.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn1">
<sup>&#xa7;</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dianda</surname>
<given-names>Mahamadi</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Khasa</surname>
<given-names>Damase P.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>D&#xe9;partement Productions Foresti&#xe8;res</institution>, <institution>Institut de l&#x2019;Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles</institution>, <addr-line>Ougadougou</addr-line>, <country>Burkina Faso</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>IAMGOLD Essakane SA, D&#xe9;partement Environnement</institution>, <addr-line>Ouagadougou</addr-line>, <country>Burkina Faso</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Laboratoire Commun de Microbiologie (LCM) IRD/ISRA/UCAD</institution>, <institution>D&#xe9;partement de Biologie v&#xe9;g&#xe9;tale</institution>, <institution>Universit&#xe9; Cheikh Anta Diop</institution>, <addr-line>Dakar-Fann</addr-line>, <country>S&#xe9;n&#xe9;gal</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
<institution>Centre d&#x2019;&#xc9;tude de la For&#xea;t (CEF) and the Institut de Biologie Int&#xe9;grative et des Syst&#x00E8;mes (IBIS)</institution>, <institution>Universit&#xe9; Laval</institution>, <addr-line>Qu&#xe9;bec</addr-line>, <addr-line>QC</addr-line>, <country>Canada</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/675878/overview">Ali Mahbub Quoreshi</ext-link>, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, Kuwait</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/436410/overview">Hayssam M. Ali</ext-link>, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1196119/overview">Richard Cheruiyot</ext-link>, Kenyatta University, Kenya</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Godar Sene, <email>godar.sene@ucad.edu.sn, senegodar@yahoo.fr</email>
</corresp>
<fn id="fn1" fn-type="equal">
<label>
<sup>&#xa7;</sup>
</label>
<p>Deceased in&#x20;2017</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="other">
<p>This article was submitted to Conservation and Restoration Ecology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Environmental Science</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>25</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>803009</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>27</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>04</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2022 Yonli, Sene, Sanon, Dianda and Khasa.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Yonli, Sene, Sanon, Dianda and Khasa</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these&#x20;terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>
<italic>Senegalia senegal</italic> (L.) Britton (Fabaceae) is a widespread, multipurpose tree capable of colonizing disturbed Sub-Saharan mining sites given its adaptations to arid lands. The purpose of this study was to determine the potential of the association of microbial and/or manure amendments with <italic>S. senegal</italic> seedlings for the effective rehabilitation of the environment post mining. A multi-year factorial experiment involving this species was conducted in a nursery and on waste rock dumps (Essakane gold mine, NE Burkina Faso). Inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi (native isolate <italic>Rhizophagus aggregatus</italic> DAOM2277128; commercial isolate <italic>Rhizophagus irregularis</italic> DAOM197198) and <italic>Mesorhizobium plurifarium</italic> strain ORS3588 was conducted on <italic>S. senegal</italic> seedlings. These were planted in black polythene bags filled with three substrate types: 100% sandy soil (substrate A); 75% sandy soil, 25% manure (substrate B); and 50% sandy soil, 50% manure (substrate C). Seedlings were then out-planted on waste rock to determine whether microbial inoculation improves their growth and survival rates. Under nursery conditions, manure-enriched substrates harboured less nodulation and AM colonization, but substantially increased plant height, and dry mass compared to un-amended substrate. Inoculation on manure-enrich substrates did not consistently increase root AM colonization and plant growth parameters among treatments. Plants that were inoculated with <italic>R. aggregatus</italic> alone or with <italic>R. irregularis</italic> or <italic>Mesorhizobium plurifarium</italic> ORS3588 showed the greatest increase in growth variables. On un-amended substrates, inoculation with R<italic>. aggregatus</italic> in combination with <italic>M. plurifarium</italic> or <italic>R. irregularis</italic> significantly enhanced root colonization rates, without altering plant growth parameters. Yet, inoculation with <italic>R. irregularis</italic> or <italic>M. plurifarium</italic> alone did not elicit increases in these parameters, although nodulation was greatly improved by the latter treatment. In field conditions, plant growth and survival were reduced under high rate manure amendments, likely due to less AM colonization and root nodulation that was observed for these treatments in nursery before out-planting. Strongly colonized plants on the un-amended substrate and moderately amended substrate showed greater survival after out-planting. Our results support the general conclusion that microbial inoculation and manure-enriched substrates are a viable option for mining site rehabilitation using <italic>S. senegal</italic>. They also suggest that manure amendments in forest nurseries should be cautiously applied given that high rates may impede establishment of plant symbioses, thereby affecting their performance on waste rock dumps following out-planting.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>disturbed soils</kwd>
<kwd>waste rock mining sites</kwd>
<kwd>arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi</kwd>
<kwd>legume nodulating rhizobia</kwd>
<kwd>manure amendments</kwd>
<kwd>
<italic>Senegalia senegal</italic> (L.) Britton</kwd>
<kwd>restoration</kwd>
<kwd>Sahel</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Mining activities produce large quantities of waste, which often creates extremely stressful conditions for restoration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Straker et&#x20;al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Li et&#x20;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Wang, 2017</xref>). In gold mining, the two main solid wastes are the tailings that result from the metal extraction process of gold and the overburden that can be used for pad and tailings dam construction. Accumulations of these two types of wastes are alkaline, biologically impoverished substrates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Buta et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>) that contain excess inorganic contaminants, which leads to the alteration of landforms and reductions in the fauna, flora and microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Rosenvald et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Novo et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>). At Essakane (Burkina Faso), the area that was affected by mining activities reached 309.4&#xa0;ha. Such extensive land disturbance needs to be ameliorated to restore it to original ecosystem conditions, or at least as closest to those conditions as it was prior to mining activities. The mining company is responsible for reclaiming disturbed sites following mining activities. To accelerate the process, land reclamation needs to be conducted using ecological technologies, including the role of native plant species as well as soil microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Bacchetta et&#x20;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Thavamani et&#x20;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Kumar et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Novo et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>). The use of phytotechnologies in remediation is recognized as a potentially cost-effective and ecologically sound alternative to current norms of degraded land rehabilitation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Grant et&#x20;al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Gastauer et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Kumar et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>). One of the key factors in the success of phytoremediation technology is the use of native species and local provenances (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Grant et&#x20;al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Bacchetta et&#x20;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bori&#x161;ev et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>), which has the advantage of maintaining the integrity of natural biodiversity by minimizing changes in the existing ecosystem (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bori&#x161;ev et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Gastauer et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>). Indigenous species are well adapted to edapho-climatic conditions of the host site; hence, their reintroduction would ensure the greatest chance for remediation success. When used appropriately, local species can facilitate natural soil formation processes, and can bring about pollutant degradation or removal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Bacchetta et&#x20;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bori&#x161;ev et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>In Burkina Faso, as is the case across the entire sub-Saharan region, one important native species is <italic>Senegalia senegal</italic> (L.) Britton (syn. <italic>Acacia senegal</italic> (L.) Willd.) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Kyalangalilwa et&#x20;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Odee et&#x20;al., 2015</xref>). This species, the gum acacia or gum Arabic tree, is a thorny, N<sub>2</sub>-fixing deciduous species in the Fabaceae that is native to arid and semi-desert regions of sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Fagg and Allison, 2004</xref>). <italic>Senegalia Senegal</italic> can attain a height of 5&#x2013;12&#xa0;m, and grows on sandy, skeletal and slightly loamy soils, with a soil pH of 5&#x2013;8. The gum acacia also grows in areas that receive 100&#x2013;950&#xa0;mm annual rainfall (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Lyam et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>). It can tolerate five to 11&#xa0;months of drought and can survive temperatures high as 43&#xb0;C, dry wind, and sandstorms.</p>
<p>The species, together with <italic>Vachellia seyal</italic> (Delile) P.J.H. Hurter (red acacia), is renowned for the copious sap that is produced when the bark is cut. The hardened exudates are collectively referred to as &#x201c;gum Arabic&#x201d;. The astringent, emulsifying, film-forming and encapsulating properties of gum arabic represents an important economic resource, which is used extensively in the food-processing, pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and lithographic ink industries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Raddad et&#x20;al., 2005</xref>). In addition, <italic>S. senegal</italic> has considerable potential for fuelwood production and as forage for animals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Midgley and Bond, 2001</xref>) and, therefore, represents an important source of income for the local populace.</p>
<p>One of the factors that favours improved growth and survival rates of seedlings after transplantation is the role that is played by symbiotic soil microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Thavamani et&#x20;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Kumar et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Singh and Gupta, 2018</xref>). Studies of symbiotic interactions between plant species and their associated microorganisms have provided evidence that nitrogen-fixing bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), which are adapted to local conditions, can play an important role in nutrient absorption and stimulate plant growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Smith and Read, 2008</xref>; Ravellini et&#x20;al., 2016; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Kumar et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>). They also exert many &#x201c;non-nutritional&#x201d; effects on plant physiology, frequently alleviating plant stress that is caused by biotic and abiotic factors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Kahindi et&#x20;al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Cardoso and Kuyper, 2006</xref>), acting as bio-control agents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Cardoso and Kuyper, 2006</xref>), stabilizing soil aggregates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Rillig and Mummey, 2006</xref>), preventing erosion, and influencing plant fitness, and sustainability of the whole plant-soil system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Van der Heijden et&#x20;al., 2006</xref>).</p>
<p>Restoration of mine wastelands has been the subject of much research worldwide over the past four&#xa0;decades. Yet, the pace of post-mining landscape restoration research and practice in Africa is sluggish compared to other parts of the world (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Festin et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Berrahmouni and Mansourian, 2021</xref>). Our goal was to evaluate the growth, survival and symbiotic responses of <italic>S. senegal</italic> seedlings to inoculation with native and exotic AM fungal and rhizobial strains using different levels of manure amendment in nursery and field conditions. We had high expectations that microbial inoculation and organic amendments would improve nutrient uptake and biomass of <italic>S. senegal</italic> that was grown under the aforementioned conditions. Findings of this study will be used to promote the successful reclamation of degraded land in the Essakane mining&#x20;area.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s2">
<title>Material and Methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>Site Description</title>
<p>The study was conducted at the Essakane gold mine (14&#xb0;22&#x2032;22.7&#x2033; N, 000&#xb0;05&#x2032;21&#x2033; E; 279&#xa0;m asl), northeastern Burkina Faso. The mine is owned by IAMGOLD (90%) and the Government of Burkina Faso (10%). The study site straddles the boundary between Oudalan and Seno Provinces in the Sahel region of Burkina Faso and is about 330&#xa0;km northeast of the capital city, Ouagadougou. The climate at this site is typical of semi-arid lands of West Africa that are characterized by a short rainy season from June to September and a dry season from October to May. Average annual rainfall fluctuates between 400 and 600&#xa0;mm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1</xref>), with temperatures ranging from 23.7 to 37.7&#xb0;C. Potential evapotranspration (PET) is relatively constant (1856.4&#xa0;mm) from year to year and relative humidity ranges from 23.8 to 59.2% (Direction G&#xe9;n&#xe9;rale de la M&#xe9;t&#xe9;orologie, Burkina Faso).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Rainfall evolution from 1961 to 2020 in Seno Province (historical data; from 1961 to 2010 were provided by Direction G&#xe9;n&#xe9;rale de la M&#xe9;t&#xe9;orologie; those from 2011 to 2020 were from Essakane Pulsonic meteorological station, Burkina Faso).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-803009-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Vegetation in the study area forms a patchy steppe, with large and small shrubs and trees. The dominant species in this environment are umbrella thorn (<italic>Vachellia tortilis</italic> [Forssk.] Galasso &#x26; Banfi), red acacia or shittah tree (<italic>Vachellia seyal</italic>), gum Arabic tree (<italic>Senegalia senegal</italic> (L.) Britton), and Egyptian balsam (<italic>Balanites aegyptiaca</italic> [L.] Delile) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Abdelaziz et al., 2020</xref>). The Essakane deposit has been an active artisanal mining site since 1985. IAMGOLD Gold industrial mining started in July 2010. Mining activities in this area have led to production of large quantities of wastes. This work focused upon waste rock dumps. The rock dump forms an artificial hill that has a slope of 18&#xb0; (3/1), with intermediate benches, which will eventually rise to a height of 55&#xa0;m and store 383 megatonnes of waste&#x20;rock.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>Seedling Preparation</title>
<p>Seeds of <italic>S. senegal</italic> were obtained from the Centre National des Semences Foresti&#xe8;res (CNSF, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso). Surface-scarified and surface-sterilized seeds were germinated in the dark at 28&#xb0;C for 48&#xa0;h in Petri dishes containing soft agar (1%). The duration of seed scarification in concentrated sulfuric acid (H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>) and rinsing with tap water was 10 and 15&#xa0;min, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Khasa, 1993</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal and Rhizobial Inoculants and Inoculation</title>
<p>Two strains of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and one strain of <italic>Mesorhizobium plurifarium</italic> (ORS 3588, Gene Bank number JQ039735) were used as inoculants. The AMF included the native isolate <italic>Rhizophagus aggregatus</italic> (Schenke and Smith emend. Koske, DAOM2277128, Dind&#xe9;resso-Burkina Faso) and the commercial isolate <italic>Rhizophagus irregularis</italic> (DAOM197198), which was provided by Premier Tech Biotechnologies (Rivi&#xe8;re-du-Loup, QC) under the commercial name Myke Pro WP). The <italic>Mesorhizobium</italic> strain was provided by the Common Laboratory of Microbiology (LCM) IRD/ISRA/UCAD in Dakar, Senegal. This strain was isolated from rhizospheric soils of <italic>S. senegal</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bakhoum et&#x20;al., 2012</xref>). It was grown in YEM medium (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Vincent, 1970</xref>) for 48&#xa0;h at 28&#xb0;C using a rotary shaker at 150&#xa0;rpm.</p>
<p>The first endomycorrhizal inoculant (<italic>R. aggregatus</italic>) was also provided by the LCM. It was multiplied on <italic>Zea mays</italic> for 12&#xa0;weeks under nursery conditions on sterilized substrate (soil and sand 1:1 v/v), and was comprised of spores, mycorrhizal root fragments, and soil. Each Gram of this inoculum contained an average of 40 spores and root fragments with 85% colonized root lengths. The second endomycorrhizal fungus (<italic>R. irregularis</italic>) was a commercial product of Myke Pro WP (Premier Tech Biotechnologies). Each Gram of inoculant contained 500 viable propagules.</p>
<p>Rhizobial inoculum was applied alone or in combination with AMF as a 10&#xa0;ml suspension containing 10<sup>8</sup> cells&#xa0;ml<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. For AM fungal inoculation, both strains were first mixed in equal amounts (v/v) and 20&#xa0;g of the inoculant were placed beneath the seedlings. Treatments without rhizobial or AM fungal inocula received 10&#xa0;ml or 20&#xa0;g of autoclaved inocula to avoid differences in soil nutrient content that was linked to rhizobial or AM fungal inoculum additions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-4">
<title>Greenhouse Experimental Design and Growth Conditions</title>
<p>The experiment was conducted in a nursery (daylight: 10&#xa0;h; average daily temperature: 25&#xb0;C&#xa0;day, 20&#xb0;C night) belonging to the mining company IAMGOLD at Essakane. The factorial experiment consisted of three substrate types: sandy soil 100% (substrate A), sandy soil (75%) mixed with manure at 25% (substrate B); and sandy soil (50%) mixed with manure at 50% (substrate C). The three substrates were crossed with eight mycorrhizal or rhizobial inoculations levels: non-inoculated (CTRL-plants); inoculated with <italic>Mesorhizobium plurifarium</italic> ORS3588 (R-plants); inoculated with <italic>R. aggregatus</italic> (RA); inoculated with <italic>R. irregularis</italic> (RI-plants); inoculated with <italic>R. irregularis</italic> and <italic>R. aggregatus</italic> (RI &#x2b; GA-plants); inoculated with <italic>Mesorhizobium</italic> ORS3588, <italic>R. irregularis</italic> and <italic>R. aggregatus</italic> (R &#x2b; RI &#x2b; GA-plants); inoculated with <italic>Mesorhizobium</italic> ORS3588 and <italic>R. aggregatus</italic> (R &#x2b; GA-plants); and inoculated with <italic>Mesorhizobium</italic> ORS3588 and <italic>R. irregularis</italic> (R &#x2b; RI-plants). Manure that was used for preparing substrates was collected from different villages in Essakane. Sandy soil samples were collected in an area where <italic>S. senegal</italic> tree plants are naturally growing with other plant species (<italic>V. tortilis, V. seyal</italic>, <italic>B. aegyptiaca</italic>). Soil samples were collected in mid-January at a depth of 0&#x2013;20&#xa0;cm. At each site, five core samples were taken every 10&#xa0;m along three parallel transects using a soil auger, and homogeneously bulked to obtain a composite sample. After bulking, soil samples were air-dried, sieved to pass a 2-mm mesh sieve, and subsampled for physical and chemical analyses. In the field experiment, waste rock samples were sampled and compared to soils of the surrounding non-contaminated area for physico-chemical analyses. Physico-chemical characteristics of the different soils and those of substrates A, B, and C were analyzed at the Bureau National des Sols (BUNASOL), Burkina Faso, and are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table&#x20;1</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Physical and chemical characteristics of the waste rock (WR) soils compared to those of an undisturbed (Natural) site located outside the mining perimeter and the different cultivation substrates.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">Characteristics</th>
<th colspan="2" align="center">Soils</th>
<th colspan="3" align="center">Substrates</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center">Waste rock</th>
<th align="center">Natural</th>
<th align="center">A</th>
<th align="center">B</th>
<th align="center">C</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Clay (%)</td>
<td align="char" char=".">24.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">21.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">5.88</td>
<td align="char" char=".">9.80</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.76</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Silt (%)</td>
<td align="char" char=".">53.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">17.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.96</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.96</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.97</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Sand (%)</td>
<td align="char" char=".">22.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">60.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">92.16</td>
<td align="char" char=".">88.24</td>
<td align="char" char=".">86.27</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Organic matter (%)</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.13</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.612</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.495</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Total C (%)</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.078</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.355</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.287</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Total N (%)</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.02</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.03</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.03</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.03</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">C/N</td>
<td align="char" char=".">4.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">13.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.10</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.80</td>
<td align="char" char=".">9.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Total <italic>p</italic> (mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="char" char=".">814.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">93.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">38.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">108.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">155.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Available <italic>p</italic> (mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.3</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.38</td>
<td align="char" char=".">17.26</td>
<td align="char" char=".">25.52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Available K (mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="char" char=".">6.5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">115.9</td>
<td align="char" char=".">17.53</td>
<td align="char" char=".">374.96</td>
<td align="char" char=".">589.23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NH<sub>4</sub> (mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="char" char=".">7.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">25.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">19.08</td>
<td align="char" char=".">15.43</td>
<td align="char" char=".">22.36</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NO<sub>3</sub> (mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="char" char=".">140.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">36.9</td>
<td align="char" char=".">51.65</td>
<td align="char" char=".">147.57</td>
<td align="char" char=".">103.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">pH (soil/water ratio 1:2.5)</td>
<td align="char" char=".">8.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">7.1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">7.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">7.4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">7.6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>In the nursery, germinated seedlings were aseptically and singly transplanted into black polythene bags (22 &#xd7; 7&#xa0;cm, with 400&#xa0;ml capacity) that were filled with substrates (A, B, and C). The pots were arranged in a factorial randomized complete block design on the bench 1&#xa0;m above the ground in a nursery. The experimental unit consisted of 3 plants giving rise to an experimental plot of 72 plants repeated eight (8) times. Duplicate trials were set up and supplied daily with tap water. After 75&#xa0;days of culture, the first set of plants was sacrificed for analyses, while the second set was transplanted to the waste rock&#x20;dumps.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-5">
<title>Measurements and Harvest</title>
<p>Plants that were removed from the pots and roots were carefully washed free of soil particles under a stream of tap water to separate them from the substrate. Growth parameters (height, collar diameter, shoot, and root dry mass), root mycorrhizal colonization and rhizobial nodulation (number of nodules, nodule dry mass) were estimated. Root, shoot, and nodule dry masses were estimated after oven-drying the samples at 70&#xb0;C for 72&#xa0;h. Percentage mycorrhizal root colonization was estimated following microscope examination of arbuscular fungal structures after first clearing the fine roots in 10% KOH and staining them with 0.05% trypan blue in lactophenol (v/v), according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Phillips and Hayman (1970)</xref>. Mycorrhizal colonization was calculated according to gridline intersect method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Giovannetti and Mosse, 1980</xref>). Mycorrhizal inoculation dependency (MID) was calculated using the following formula (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Plenchette et&#x20;al., 1983</xref>): MID (%) &#x3d; 100 x [(dry mass of mycorrhizal plants&#x2014;dry mass of non-mycorrhizal plants)/dry mass of mycorrhizal plants].</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-6">
<title>Transplanting in the Mining Site</title>
<p>We transplanted the seedlings onto the waste rock dumps using the same experimental design that was set up in the nursery. The plants were transplanted into holes (20&#xa0;cm in diameter, 30&#xa0;cm deep) with 2&#xa0;m distance between holes in the direction of the slope, and 3&#xa0;m along the slope perpendicular. Blocks were arranged perpendicular to the slope gradient to contain experimental units that were as homogenous as possible. To avoid destructive harvesting of the plants, the plant characteristics related to height were measured at 3&#xa0;months, then at 12 and 72&#xa0;months after transplantation. This monitoring also made it possible to evaluate the survival rate for each treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-7">
<title>Statistical Analysis</title>
<p>All data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) with XLSTAT version 2016 on Windows. A multi-factorial model of ANOVA that takes into account the factors block, substrate and inoculation, together with their interactions was used. A negative binomial regression model was applied to the nodule counts, and for post-hoc comparisons of averages, the Student-Newman-Keuls (SNK) test was implemented (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c;&#x20;0.05).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>Soil Properties</title>
<p>Soil characteristics of the different substrates are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table&#x20;1</xref> and compared to those of waste rock samples and soil samples from the undisturbed natural zone. Mine tailings showed low levels of C, N and <italic>p</italic> compared to soil taken from the undisturbed natural environment. The waste rock contained higher silt content with alkaline pH. Yet, substrates A, B, and C and the soil samples from the natural environment exhibited a sandy texture and pH values were close to neutrality. As expected, manure-enriched substrates B and C had higher levels of organic matter and other nutrients compared to the 100% sandy substrate A (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table&#x20;1</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>Plant Nodulation in the Nursery</title>
<p>Data on nodule dry masses are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table&#x20;2</xref>. Nodule dry masses varied significantly (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.01) not only among substrates, but also among inocula. Negative binomial regression revealed significant differences among the substrates A, B, and C. The highest nodule dry masses per plant were recorded on substrate A (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table&#x20;2</xref>). Nodule dry masses also varied according to the inoculum that was used (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.01). Our results showed greater nodule dry masses with plants that were inoculated with either <italic>Mesorhizobium plurifarium</italic> (R) alone or in combination with <italic>R. aggregatus</italic> (R &#x2b; GA). Lowest nodule dry masses were observed on plants that were inoculated with only <italic>R. irregularis</italic> (RI) and on the uninoculated control plants (CTRL). Yet, the interaction between the substrate and inoculation treatments did not significantly affect this variable. Neither the substrates nor the inocula significantly affected nodule dry masses, but their interaction showed significant variation (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05) for this variable (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table&#x20;2</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Nodulation (nodule dry mass) and Growth (height) of <italic>S. senegal</italic> seedlings that were grown on different inoculated or uninoculated substrates in nursery conditions (75 DAS). For each factor, means of variables followed by the same letter in the same column do not significantly differ according to the Bonferroni step-down test at <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05. Means&#x20;&#xb1; standard errors are shown (n &#x3d; 8).</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" colspan="2" align="left">Treatments</th>
<th align="center">Nodule dry mass (g)</th>
<th align="center">Plant height (cm)</th>
<th align="center">Collar diameter (mm)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center">75 DAS</th>
<th align="center">75 DAS</th>
<th align="center">75 DAS</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Substrates</td>
<td align="left">A</td>
<td align="center">1.76<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.13</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">18.1<sup>b</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.86</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">2.8&#xa0;<sup>b</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Substrates</td>
<td align="left">B</td>
<td align="center">1.11<sup>b</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.14</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">26.6<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.9</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">3.9<sup>a</sup>&#xb1;0.07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Substrates</td>
<td align="left">C</td>
<td align="center">1.25<sup>b</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.14</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">26.2<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.88</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">3.9<sup>a</sup>&#xb1;0.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="8" align="left">Inoculation</td>
<td align="left">Control</td>
<td align="center">1.13<sup>b</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.16</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">24.6<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.96</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">3.5<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.108</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>R. aggregatus</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">1.2<sup>ab</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.16</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">24.0<sup>a</sup>&#xb1;0.67</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">3.7<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.152</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>R. irregularis</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">1.1<sup>b</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.16</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">22.6<sup>a</sup>&#xb1;0.82</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">3.5<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.152</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>R. irregularis &#x2b; R. aggregatus</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">1.36<sup>ab</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.16</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">24.1<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.79</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">3.7<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.152</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>M. plurifarium</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">1.32<sup>ab</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.16</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">22.6<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.74</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">3.5<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.152</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>M. plurifarium</italic> &#x2b; <italic>R. aggregatus</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">1.84<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.16</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">23.6<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.81</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">3.7<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.152</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>M. plurifarium</italic> &#x2b; <italic>R. irregularis</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">1.35<sup>ab</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.16</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">23.2<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.87</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">3.5<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.152</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>M .plurifarium</italic> &#x2b; <italic>R. irregularis &#x2b; R. aggregatus</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">1.65<sup>ab</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.16</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">24.0<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.93</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">3.6<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 0.152</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>(DAS) days after sowing.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F10" position="float">
<label>FIGURE</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>PHOTO 1:</bold> View of <italic>S. senegal</italic> plants 75 days after sowing in nursery conditions. Note the difference in height between substrates A, B and C.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-803009-fx1.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>Mycorrhizal Colonization in the Nursery</title>
<p>Mycorrhizal root colonization rates are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure&#x20;2</xref>. AM fungi colonized seedlings in all treatments at 75&#xa0;days after sowing, but at various rates. The intensity of mycorrhizal colonization was significantly different (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.001) among the substrates, the inoculation treatments and their interactions (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table&#x20;3</xref>). The colonization rate that was expressed here as the intensity of mycorrhizal colonization was greater on substrate A than on substrates B and C, regardless of inoculum. For the same substrate type, plants that were inoculated with <italic>R. aggregatus</italic> strain alone or in combination with other microbial strains showed the greatest mycorrhizal colonization compared to other treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure&#x20;2</xref>). There was no difference among inoculated treatments for substrate B. For substrate C, triple inoculation (<italic>Mesorhizobium</italic> &#x2b; <italic>R. irregularis</italic> &#x2b; <italic>R. aggregatus</italic>) exhibited the best mycorrhizal colonization compared to the others (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure&#x20;2</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Root mycorrhizal colonization of <italic>S. senegal</italic> seedlings that were grown on different inoculated or uninoculated substrates in nursery conditions. For each substrate, bars with the same letters do not significantly differ according to the Bonferroni step-down test at <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05. (Ctrl) control; (R), <italic>Mesorhizobium plurifarium</italic>; (RI), <italic>Rhizophagus irregularis</italic>; (RA), <italic>Rhizophagus aggregatus.</italic>
</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-803009-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Significance level obtained from two-way ANOVA testing the effects of inoculation and substrates on different parameters measured in the nursery and mine field conditions.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">&#xa0;</th>
<th align="center">Block</th>
<th align="center">Substrates</th>
<th align="center">Inoculations</th>
<th align="center">Block &#x2a; substrates</th>
<th align="center">Block &#x2a; inoculation</th>
<th align="center">Substrates &#x2a; inoculations</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Num DF</td>
<td align="center">7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2</td>
<td align="center">7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">23</td>
<td align="center">63</td>
<td align="char" char=".">23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Growth</td>
<td align="center">4.83&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="char" char=".">152.09 &#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">ns</td>
<td align="char" char=".">21.06&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">ns</td>
<td align="char" char=".">14.56&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Collar diameter</td>
<td align="center">8.33&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="char" char=".">134.69 &#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">ns</td>
<td align="char" char=".">29.11&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">1.3&#x2a;</td>
<td align="char" char=".">12.47&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Shoot dry mass</td>
<td align="center">8.93&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="char" char=".">143.92 &#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">ns</td>
<td align="char" char=".">34.69&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">1.45&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="char" char=".">13.21&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Root dry mass</td>
<td align="center">12.54&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="char" char=".">30.45 &#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">ns</td>
<td align="char" char=".">13.5&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">2.08&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.58&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Colonization intensity</td>
<td align="center">ns</td>
<td align="char" char=".">99.43 &#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">5.4 &#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="char" char=".">11.12&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">1.22&#x2a;</td>
<td align="char" char=".">13.09 &#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Nodule dry mass</td>
<td align="center">2.51&#x2a;</td>
<td align="char" char=".">14.32 &#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">2.56 &#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.5&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
<td align="center">ns</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.01&#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>F value; &#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05; &#x2a;&#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.01; &#x2a;&#x2a;&#x2a;<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.001 (ns) not significant.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Our results showed that regardless of the substrate used, the mycorrhizal inoculation dependency (MID) of the plant species was higher with <italic>R. aggregatus</italic> for substrate A (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table&#x20;4</xref>) and with <italic>R. aggregatus</italic> &#x2b; <italic>R. irregularis</italic> for substrate B. When taking into account the culture substrates, the plants exhibited greatest mycorrhizal dependency on substrate A, and followed by the substrate B. Substrate C had the lowest MID, with negative values for all mycorrhizal treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table&#x20;4</xref>). No AM fungal structure was found in the root systems of plant controls or those inoculated with <italic>M. plurifarium</italic>&#x20;alone.</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Mycorrhizal dependency of <italic>S. senegal</italic> seedlings as a function of substrate types (A, B, and C).</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">Treatments</th>
<th colspan="3" align="center">Substrates</th>
<th rowspan="2" align="center">Total</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center">A</th>
<th align="center">B</th>
<th align="center">C</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Control</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>R. aggregatus</italic>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">31.64</td>
<td align="char" char=".">14.32</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;4.42</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>R. irregularis</italic>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">13.06</td>
<td align="char" char=".">16.15</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;10.86</td>
<td align="char" char=".">4.86</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>R. irregularis &#x2b; R. aggregatus</italic>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">16.03</td>
<td align="char" char=".">26.24</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;1.88</td>
<td align="char" char=".">12.15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>M. plurifarium</italic>
</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>M. plurifarium</italic> &#x2b; <italic>R. aggregatus</italic>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">15.85</td>
<td align="char" char=".">17.87</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;4.03</td>
<td align="char" char=".">10.95</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>M. plurifarium</italic> &#x2b; <italic>R. irregularis</italic>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">25.46</td>
<td align="char" char=".">16.25</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;1.04</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.85</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>M. plurifarium</italic> &#x2b; <italic>R. irregularis &#x2b; R. aggregatus</italic>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">19.74</td>
<td align="char" char=".">3.14</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;7.21</td>
<td align="char" char=".">2.24</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4">
<title>Plant Growth in the Nursery</title>
<p>The block factor, together with the block by substrate interaction, influenced almost all growth parameters (shoot and root biomasses, plant height, and collar diameter). Data on the effects of substrate types and inoculation treatments on plant growth are reported in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Tables 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>. Blocks and the type of substrate influenced plant growth, with plant height and collar diameter varying significantly (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.001) among substrates (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table&#x20;3</xref>, Photograph 1). Substrate B and substrate C recorded the greatest plant heights at 26.6 and 26.2&#xa0;cm, respectively. Plant heights for these treatments differed from those of substrate A, which averaged 18.1&#xa0;cm (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table&#x20;2</xref>). Collar diameters followed the same trend (4.0, 3.9, and 2.8&#xa0;mm for the substrates B, C, and A, respectively). Inoculation treatments and the substrate by inoculation interaction did not reveal significant differences in either plant height or collar diameter (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table&#x20;2</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Shoot dry mass of <italic>S. senegal</italic> seedlings that were grown on different inoculated or uninoculated substrates in nursery conditions. For each substrate, bars with the same letters do not significantly differ according to the Bonferroni step-down test at <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05. (Ctrl) control; (R) <italic>Mesorhizobium plurifarium</italic>; (RI), <italic>Rhizophagus irregularis</italic>; (RA), <italic>Rhizophagus aggregatus.</italic>
</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-803009-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Root dry mass of <italic>S. senegal</italic> seedlings that were grown on different inoculated or uninoculated substrates in nursery conditions. For each substrate, bars with the same letters do not significantly differ according to the Bonferroni step-down test at <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05. (Ctrl) control; (R), <italic>Mesorhizobium plurifarium</italic>; (RI), <italic>Rhizophagus irregularis</italic>; (RA), <italic>Rhizophagus aggregatus.</italic>
</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-803009-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Similarly, for the plant height, both shoot, and root biomasses that were recorded on substrate B and substrate C were significantly higher than those of substrate A (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figures 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>). For inoculation treatments, a significant difference was only noted for inoculated plants on substrate A. For this substrate, plants that were inoculated with <italic>R. aggregatus</italic> exhibited the greatest shoot biomass. Control plants (CTRL), and those that were inoculated with <italic>R. irregularis</italic> and <italic>Mesorhizobium plurifarium</italic> alone showed the lowest shoot biomass (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure&#x20;3</xref>).</p>
<p>Regardless of the substrate types that were used, there was no difference in the inoculation factor. The interaction between substrates and inoculation treatments had a significant (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05) effect on both root and shoot biomass production (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table&#x20;3</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-5">
<title>Plant Growth and Survival Rate in the Field</title>
<p>Results for plant growth and survival rates are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Tables 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">5</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">6</xref>. The variation in most parameters among blocks underscores the inherent heterogeneity of the study site and would be justified by the choice of experimental set-up that minimizes the effect of uncontrolled factors on the plant responses during the study (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table&#x20;3</xref>). Three months after transplantation onto the mining site, mean plant growth on the waste rock varied significantly among the substrates (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.001). We observed a greater increase for the seedlings that were grown on substrate B in the nursery. Yet, there was no significant difference for the comparisons between inocula that were applied to the different substrates (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Table&#x20;5</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
<label>TABLE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Growth (height) of <italic>S. senegal</italic> seedlings that were grown on different inoculated or uninoculated substrates in field mine from 3 to 72 MAT. For each factor, means of values followed by the same letter in the same column do not significantly differ according to the Bonferroni step-down test at <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05. Means&#x20;&#xb1; standard errors are shown (n &#x3d; 8).</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" colspan="2" align="left">Treatments</th>
<th colspan="3" align="center">Plant height (cm)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center">3 MAT</th>
<th align="center">12 MAT</th>
<th align="center">72 MAT</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Substrates</td>
<td align="left">A</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">24.13<sup>c</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 1.62</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">50.47<sup>c</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 2.29</td>
<td align="center">131.37<sup>b</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 5.89</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Substrates</td>
<td align="left">B</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">30.06<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 1.03</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">60.75<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 3.77</td>
<td align="center">143.34<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 6.12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Substrates</td>
<td align="left">C</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">28.16<sup>b</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 1.04</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">54.64<sup>b</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 1.02</td>
<td align="center">136.40<sup>ab</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 5.86</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="8" align="left">Inoculation</td>
<td align="left">Control</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">27.16<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 1.05</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">57.72<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 2.55</td>
<td align="center">138.42<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 6.46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>R. aggregatus</italic>
</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">27.77<sup>a</sup>&#xb1;0.69</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">54.92<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 2.21</td>
<td align="center">130.52<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 8.35</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>R. irregularis</italic>
</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">25.75<sup>a</sup>&#xb1;1.98</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">51.04<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 2.96</td>
<td align="center">133.02<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 5.75</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>R. irregularis &#x2b; R. aggregatus</italic>
</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">27.64<sup>a</sup>&#xb1;1.43</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">56.31<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 1.68</td>
<td align="center">142.13<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 6.31</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>M. plurifarium</italic>
</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">28.09<sup>a</sup>&#xb1;1.87</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">55.47<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 2.55</td>
<td align="center">137.98<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 7.43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>M. plurifarium</italic> &#x2b; R<italic>. aggregatus</italic>
</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">27.69<sup>a</sup>&#xb1;1.81</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">56.09<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 2.06</td>
<td align="center">146.62<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 9.65</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>M. plurifarium</italic> &#x2b; <italic>R. irregularis</italic>
</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">27.15<sup>a</sup>&#xb1;1.63</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">49.96<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 3.72</td>
<td align="center">128.33<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 9.78</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>M .plurifarium</italic> &#x2b; <italic>R. irregularis &#x2b; R. aggregatus</italic>
</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">27.78<sup>a</sup>&#xb1;1.76</td>
<td align="char" char="plusmn">60.20<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 3.15</td>
<td align="center">137.58<sup>a</sup>&#x20;&#xb1; 7.53</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>(MAT) months after transplantation.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T6" position="float">
<label>TABLE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Survival rates (%) at 72&#xa0;months after transplantation of <italic>S. senegal</italic> seedlings that were grown on different inoculated or uninoculated substrates in field&#x20;mine.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">Treatments</th>
<th colspan="3" align="center">Plant survival rates (%)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="center">Substrate A</th>
<th align="center">Substrate B</th>
<th align="center">Substrate C</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Control</td>
<td align="char" char=".">95.8</td>
<td align="char" char=".">95.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">79.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>R. aggregatus</italic>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">91.3</td>
<td align="char" char=".">90.5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">90.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>R. irregularis</italic>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">90.9</td>
<td align="char" char=".">82.6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">81.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>R. irregularis &#x2b; R. aggregatus</italic>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">79.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">90.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">90.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>M. plurifarium</italic>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">83.3</td>
<td align="char" char=".">95.5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">73.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>M. plurifarium</italic> &#x2b; R<italic>. aggregatus</italic>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">100</td>
<td align="char" char=".">100</td>
<td align="char" char=".">73.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>M. plurifarium</italic> &#x2b; <italic>R. irregularis</italic>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">87.5</td>
<td align="char" char=".">79.2</td>
<td align="char" char=".">78.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>M .plurifarium</italic> &#x2b; <italic>R. irregularis &#x2b; R. aggregatus</italic>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">91.3</td>
<td align="char" char=".">85.7</td>
<td align="char" char=".">69.6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Plant growth was remarkably high on substrate B, particularly during the first 72&#xa0;months. Substrate B showed a significant difference compared to substrate A. Inoculation did not affect plant height, although each treatment varied in terms of plant growth. Nevertheless, the trend was that dual inoculations of <italic>R. irregularis</italic> &#x2b; <italic>R. aggregatus</italic> and <italic>Mesorhizobium</italic> &#x2b; <italic>R. aggregatus</italic>, together with the triple inoculation of <italic>Mesorhizobium</italic> &#x2b; <italic>R. irregularis</italic> &#x2b; <italic>R. aggregatus</italic>, showed the best growth, and even though the differences that were obtained are not significant (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Table&#x20;5</xref>).</p>
<p>Neither substrates nor inocula exerted an effect on seedling survival rate 72&#xa0;months after transplantation (MAT). We recorded an overall survival of 95.14% at 3&#xa0;months after transplantation. Overall survival rates of seedlings were 94.1% at 12 MAT and 89.06% at 72 MAT (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">Table&#x20;6</xref>). The seedlings that were grown on the substrate A survived at rates (mean&#x20;&#xb1; standard deviations) of 97.39&#x20;&#xb1; 2.9, 96.83&#x20;&#xb1; 2.75, and 89.58&#x20;&#xb1; 5.89% at 3, 12, and 72 MAT, respectively. For seedlings that were grown on substrate B, plant survival was 93.23&#x20;&#xb1; 4.63, 93.75&#x20;&#xb1; 4.65, and 85.42&#x20;&#xb1; 5.89% at 3, 12, and 72 MAT, respectively. Plants of substrate C showed rates of 94.79&#x20;&#xb1; 2.75, 94.20&#x20;&#xb1; 2.95, and 79.58&#x20;&#xb1; 9.53% at 3, 12, and 72 MAT, respectively. Therefore, the survival rates tended to decrease from substrate A, followed by substrate B, although differences were not significant.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The &#x201c;Arabic gum&#x201d; species that was used in this study is a multipurpose tree commonly grown in agroforestry systems under arid and semi-arid climatic conditions of West Africa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Atangana et <italic>al.,</italic> 2014</xref>). It usually tolerates drought and can survive under high temperature, making it an ideal candidate for testing the potential of microbial, and manure amendments for the rehabilitation of mining sites in this&#x20;area.</p>
<sec id="s4-1">
<title>Plant Responses to Microbial Inoculation</title>
<p>A potentially major limitation to vegetation establishment on mine soils is likely the absence of the microflora (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Rapai et&#x20;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Thavamani et&#x20;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Wang 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Novo et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>) that are intimately involved in plant nutrition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Smith and Read, 2008</xref>; Ravellini et&#x20;al., 2016; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Kumar et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>) and nutrient cycling processes in natural soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Kahindi et&#x20;al., 1997</xref>). Among these soil-dwelling microorganisms, AM fungi and nitrogen-fixing bacteria play a crucial role in nutrient acquisition by plants in most disturbed ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Kahindi et&#x20;al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Smith and Read, 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Smith and Read, 2008</xref>). Examination of waste rock samples from the Essakane mining site showed that they are physically, chemically, and biologically poor materials (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table&#x20;1</xref>) that could hinder vegetation development. To ensure rapid and effective establishment of <italic>S. senegal</italic> seedlings and nutrient cycling processes, we tested the introduction of selected soil microorganisms to overcome plant nutritional limitations in waste rock dumps and further form soils that would support and sustain native vegetation. The results from nursery experiments showed that inoculation did not consistently increase plant height or shoot and root dry mass between treatments of the manure-enriched substrates. The overall trend was that plants inoculated with the indigenous AM fungus <italic>R. aggregatus</italic> alone or concurrently with <italic>R. irregularis</italic> or <italic>Mesorhizobium plurifarium</italic> ORS3588 demonstrated the best increase for plant height or for shoot and root dry mass. Nevertheless, the nodulation and AM fungal colonization rates of plants inoculated with <italic>R. aggregatus</italic> for the un-amended substrate were significantly increased, together with plant growth, and biomass production. These responses agree with past studies that have shown that AM fungal applications generate positive plant responses in mine restoration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Rapai et&#x20;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Wulandari and Tawaraya, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Ohsowski et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>) and on phosphorus-poor substrates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Gemma et&#x20;al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Ndoye et&#x20;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Guissou et&#x20;al., 2016</xref>). The increase that was observed with <italic>R. aggregatus</italic> was more significant when <italic>M. plurifarium</italic> ORS3588 was inoculated concurrently. This result suggests a potential synergistic effect between these AM fungal and rhizobial strains and confirmed results of several reports on increased plant growth attributable to dual or triple microbial inoculation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Sene et&#x20;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bakhoum et&#x20;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Ndoye et&#x20;al., 2015</xref>).</p>
<p>In contrast, seedlings that were inoculated with the commercial AM fungus <italic>R. irregularis</italic> alone did not show any increase in root plant colonization rate and growth with neither for the manure-enriched nor un-amended substrates. These results suggest that <italic>R. aggregatus</italic> isolated from the rhizosphere of Australasian black wattle or mangium (<italic>Acacia mangium</italic> Willd.) growing at Dinderesso, Burkina Faso, is more efficient than the commercial introduced AM fungus in this harsh landscape. Similar negative or neutral effects after seedling inoculation with the commercial fungus <italic>R. irregularis</italic> had been observed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Sarasin <italic>et&#x20;al.</italic> (2017)</xref> for the native <italic>Mimosa latispinosa</italic> Lam. in Madagascar, and likewise by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Ohsowski <italic>et&#x20;al.</italic> (2018)</xref> in a sandpit restoration to grassland in Southern Ontario, Canada. In Senegal, previous tracing of inoculants with three cultivars of peanut (<italic>Arachis hypogaea</italic> L.) showed that the exotic commercial strain did not form symbioses with plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Sene et&#x20;al., 2010</xref>). These data and our results from the Essakane mining site raise questions about the efficacy of commercial microbial isolates in harsh tropical ecosystems. Indeed, the AM fungal strain <italic>R. irregularis</italic> was isolated from a boreal environment in the Province of Quebec, Canada (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Stockinger et&#x20;al., 2009</xref>). Despite its wide ecological valence, this AM fungal strain is less efficient compared to the indigenous strain <italic>R. aggregatus</italic> in the present study. A gap in the ecological adaptation of this AM fungal strain should be considered, as has been suggested in the study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Sarasin <italic>et&#x20;al.</italic> (2017)</xref>.</p>
<p>Biological nitrogen-fixation by <italic>Acacia</italic> species has been previously reported to reach optimal rates on extremely contrasting soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Vincent et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bakhoum <italic>et&#x20;al.</italic> (2016)</xref> reported beneficial effects of <italic>M. plurifarium</italic> ORS3588 inoculation on <italic>S. senegal</italic> growth that could be attributed to the rhizobial inoculant that was used and its highest performance in comparison to indigenous microorganisms. From this study, rhizobial inoculation improved root nodulation, yet we found no evidence that inoculation by <italic>M. plurifarium</italic> ORS3588 increased plant growth and biomass. At first sight, the physico-chemical analyses of the unamended substrate showed limited nutrient contents (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table&#x20;1</xref>). Thus, the lack of an inoculation effect on plant growth and biomass production may be due to the fact that efficient N<sub>2</sub>-fixation requires additional substances, which must be available in the soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Lekberg and Koide, 2005</xref>), such as phosphorus and specific trace metals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bellenger et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Gonz&#xe1;lez-Guerrero et&#x20;al., 2014</xref>). On the amended substrates, macro-nutrient elements were available, but we did not measure micro-nutrients, particularly available Fe, Mo, and V concentrations. Moreover, we had failed to detect a positive effect of rhizobial inoculation. Thus, the application of a solitary <italic>M. plurifarium</italic> ORS3588 isolate may not benefit <italic>S. senegal</italic> plants when restoring disturbed areas such as mining sites. Therefore, we suggest dual inoculation using compatible rhizobial and mycorrhizal fungal strains for enhancing restoration of gold waste dumps using legume species.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-2">
<title>Plant Response to Manure-enriched Soils</title>
<p>Manure-enriched soils are traditionally used and recommended to favour nursery plant growth. Since analyses of the waste rock samples showed low nutrient contents, we tested manure amendments at the rates of 25 and 50% to increase soil nutrient levels. Our data showed that seedlings grown on manure-enriched soils harboured fewer nodules and were less colonized by AM fungi than seedlings that were grown in soil without the amendment. This result suggests that levels of manure used do not ensure the efficient establishment of plant-microbe symbioses. Inhibitory effects of compost and biochar amendments on plant symbioses have been reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Rapai <italic>et&#x20;al.</italic> (2016)</xref> and may affect competitive relationships between plants and AM fungi. In the case of our study, this might have occurred because the seedlings that were not grown on manure-enriched substrate had more to gain than those grown on manure-enriched substrates. Seedlings on the un-enriched substrate were prone to establishing symbioses with microbial inoculants in this nutrient-impoverished state. Another probable explanation is the fact that manure-enriched substrates may contain bacteria that could negatively influence seedling symbioses. Notwithstanding these negative effects on seedling symbioses, manure-enriched substrates that were applied at the rate of 25% increased plant growth (height and collar diameter) and biomass production under both nursery and field conditions at the mine. An inhibitory effect on plant performance was observed for manure amendments at the rate of 50%. There is a strong likelihood that the latter imposes stress upon plant relationships with the soil biota, thereby reducing their performance.</p>
<p>The survival rate of seedlings in the field is critical to phytoremediation success (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Grant et&#x20;al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Gastauer et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Kumar et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>). From this work, plants exhibiting the best growth in the nursery (given that nutrients were present in the manure treatments) did not survive better on the ground because of insufficient mycorrhizal infection to take-up the few nutrients that were available in the mining soil. The highest plant survival rates coincided with the most AM-dependent ones. High nutrient availability from manure amendments was beneficial to nutrient acquisition for seedlings, but may gain less for the establishment of their symbioses, which could have dramatic long-term effects on planting survival in stressful field conditions. This result, together with data from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Wulandari and Tawaraya, (2016)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Rapai <italic>et&#x20;al.</italic> (2016)</xref>, suggests that healthy pre-inoculated seedlings under nursery conditions may lead to great post-planting success on mining sites. In fact, plants in mine sites are dependent, to varying degrees, on associations between their roots, and soil microorganisms for efficient nutrient acquisition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Wulandari <italic>and Tawaraya,</italic> 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Ohsowski et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>). Therefore, a better interaction among manure and microbial amendments that could facilitates a high degree of root colonization might be more beneficial for plant establishment. Based upon the results of this study, the rate of 25% of manure could provide sufficient organic matter, increasing substrate aggregation, and plant root colonization. Therefore, we suggest production of <italic>S. senegal</italic> pre-inoculated seedlings with <italic>Rhizophagus aggregatus</italic> DAOM2277128 and <italic>Mesorhizobium plurifarium</italic> strain ORS3588 in 25% of manure-enriched sandy soil in nursery.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5">
<title>Conclusion and Further Directions</title>
<p>This study demonstrated the adaptive capacity of the legume tree <italic>S. senegal</italic> on the Essakane mining site after being exposed to inoculants and manure amendments. This is an important step in the process of disturbed site rehabilitation. On relatively nutrient-poor substrates, AM fungal and rhizobial colonization was greater, but plants were less developed in the nursery. In the field, however, the measurements indicated that the plants, which were small in the nursery, but better colonized by the fungi, and rhizobia, survived well compared to those of the manure-enriched treatments which were vigorous in the nursery but with fewer mycorrhiza and rhizobia. The results support the general conclusion that manure-enriched substrates and microbial inoculation could be an option for mining site rehabilitation. Yet, manure amendments should be applied with caution, given that high rates may induce further stress in plant symbioses and, therefore, their performance in waste rock dumps. Nevertheless, when these soil additives are used optimally, plants may gain more from manure, and microbial co-amendments. To maximize rehabilitation efforts on mining sites, pioneer herbaceous plants should be further taken into account since they are highly mycotrophic and decompose quickly, thereby augmenting the soil organic matter pool. In this sense, the agroforestry concept combining herbaceous and wood plants, and soil co-amendments with bio-inputs is the way forward that can enhance and accelerate mine restoration for full recovery of ecosystem services.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s6">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>All authors participated to the Conceptualization, Methodology, Data analysis, Writing&#x2014;original draft, review, and editing manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The work received funding from IAMGOLD Essakane SA, MITACS and support from NSERC (Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada) Discovery Grant.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s9">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s10">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>This paper is published in memory of our esteemed colleague, KS. We are thankful to our collaborators at INERA/DEF (Burkina Faso) and the Common Laboratory of Microbiology (LCM) IRD/ISRA/UCAD (Senegal), together with the Centre for Forest Research (CEF) at Laval University, Quebec, Canada. Discovery Grant to DPK is also acknowledged. W.F.J.&#x20;Parsons corrected the English.</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abdelaziz</surname>
<given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Medraoui</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alami</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pakhrou</surname>
<given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Makkaoui</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boukhary</surname>
<given-names>A.O.M.S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Inter simple sequence repeat markers to assess genetic diversity of the desert date (<italic>Balanites aegyptiaca</italic> Del.) for Sahelian ecosystem restoration</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-020-71835-9</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Atangana</surname>
<given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khasa</surname>
<given-names>D. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname>
<given-names>S. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Degrande</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Tropical Agroforestry</article-title>. <comment>Springer Science&#x2b;Business Media, Dordrecht. ISBN 978-94-007-7722-4</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-94-007-7723-1</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bacchetta</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cappai</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carucci</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tamburini</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Use of Native Plants for the Remediation of Abandoned Mine Sites in Mediterranean Semiarid Environments</article-title>. <source>Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.</source> <volume>94</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>326</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>333</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00128-015-1467-y</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bakhoum</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ndoye</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kane</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Assigbetse</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fall</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sylla</surname>
<given-names>S. N.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Impact of Rhizobial Inoculation on <italic>Acacia senegal</italic> (L.) Willd. Growth in Greenhouse and Soil Functioning in Relation to Seed Provenance and Soil Origin</article-title>. <source>World J.&#x20;Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>2567</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2579</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11274-012-1066-6</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bakhoum</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Odee</surname>
<given-names>D. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fall</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ndoye</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kane</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kimiti</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Senegalia senegal</italic> Response to Inoculation with Rhizobial Strains Vary in Relation to Seed Provenance and Soil Type</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil.</source> <volume>398</volume> (<issue>1&#x2013;2</issue>), <fpage>181</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>193</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-015-2655-6</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bellenger</surname>
<given-names>J.-P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wichard</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kraepiel</surname>
<given-names>A. M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kraepiel</surname>
<given-names>A. M. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Essential Metals for Nitrogen Fixation in a Free-Living N2-Fixing Bacterium: Chelation, Homeostasis and High Use Efficiency</article-title>. <source>Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>1395</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1411</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02440.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Berrahmouni</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mansourian</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <source>Review of forest and Landscape Restoration in Africa</source>. <publisher-loc>Accra</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>FAO and AUDA-NEPAD</publisher-name>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4060/cb6111en</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bori&#x161;ev</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pajevi&#x107;</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nikoli&#x107;</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pilipovi&#x107;</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arsenov</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>&#x17d;upunski</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Mine Site Restoration Using Silvicultural Approach</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Bio-Geotechnologies for Mine Site Rehabilitation</source>. Editors <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Prasad</surname>
<given-names>M. N. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Favas</surname>
<given-names>P. J.&#x20;C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maiti</surname>
<given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <edition>1st ed</edition> (<publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>), <fpage>115</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>130</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-12-812986-9.00007-5</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Buta</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blaga</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paulette</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>P&#x0103;curar</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roca</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Borsai</surname>
<given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Soil Reclamation of Abandoned Mine Lands by Revegetation in Northwestern Part of Transylvania: A 40-Year Retrospective Study</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>11</volume>, <comment>3393</comment>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cardoso</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuyper</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Mycorrhizas and Tropical Soil Fertility</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>116</volume>, <fpage>72</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>84</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2006.03.011</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fagg</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Allison</surname>
<given-names>G. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Acacia senegal</italic> and the Gum Arabic Trade. Monograph and Annotated Bibliography</article-title>. <source>Trop. For.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>261</fpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Festin</surname>
<given-names>E. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tigabu</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chileshe</surname>
<given-names>M. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Syampungani</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Od&#xe9;n</surname>
<given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Progresses in Restoration of post-mining Landscape in Africa</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;For. Res.</source> <volume>30</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>381</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>396</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/w11676-018-0621-x10.1007/s11676-018-0621-x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gastauer</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Silva</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Caldeira Junior</surname>
<given-names>C. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramos</surname>
<given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Souza Filho</surname>
<given-names>P. W. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Furtini Neto</surname>
<given-names>A. E.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Mine Land Rehabilitation: Modern Ecological Approaches for More Sustainable Mining</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Clean. Prod. Prod.</source> <volume>172</volume>, <fpage>1409</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1422</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.223</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gemma</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koske</surname>
<given-names>R. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Habte</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Mycorrhizal Dependency of Some Endemic and Endangered Hawaiian Plant Species</article-title>. <source>Am. J.&#x20;Bot.</source> <volume>89</volume>, <fpage>337</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>345</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3732/ajb.89.2.337</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Giovannetti</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mosse</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1980</year>). <article-title>An Evaluation of Techniques for Measuring Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Infection in Roots</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>84</volume>, <fpage>489</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>500</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.1980.tb04556.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gonz&#xe1;lez-Guerrero</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matthiadis</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>S&#xe1;ez</surname>
<given-names>&#xc1;. n.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Long</surname>
<given-names>T. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Fixating on Metals: New Insights into the Role of Metals in Nodulation and Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>45</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2014.00045</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Grant</surname>
<given-names>C. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Campbell</surname>
<given-names>C. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Charnock</surname>
<given-names>N. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Selection of Species Suitable for Derelict Mine Site Rehabilitation in New South Wales, Australia</article-title>. <source>Water Air Soil Pollut.</source> <volume>139</volume>, <fpage>215</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>235</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1015860025136</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guissou</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Babana</surname>
<given-names>A. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sanon</surname>
<given-names>K. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>B&#xe2;</surname>
<given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizae on Growth and mineral Nutrition of Greenhouse Propagated Fruit Trees from Diverse Geographic Provenances</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ.</source> <volume>20</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>417</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>426</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25518/1780-4507.13149</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kahindi</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;H. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Woomer</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>George</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Souza Moreira</surname>
<given-names>F. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karanja</surname>
<given-names>N. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giller</surname>
<given-names>K. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Agricultural Intensification, Soil Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function in the Tropics: the Role of Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>55</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>76</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0929-1393(96)00151-5</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Khasa</surname>
<given-names>P. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Acid Scarification and Hot Water Soaking of <italic>Racosperma Auriculiforme</italic> Seeds</article-title>. <source>For. Chronicle.</source> <volume>69</volume>, <fpage>331</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>334</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5558/tfc69331-3</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tripti</surname>
<given-names>M. N. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prasad</surname>
<given-names>M. N. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maiti</surname>
<given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Favas</surname>
<given-names>P. J.&#x20;C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Mycoremediation for Mine Site Rehabilitation</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Bio-Geotechnologies for Mine Site Rehabilitation</source>. Editors <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Prasad</surname>
<given-names>M. N. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Favas</surname>
<given-names>P. J.&#x20;C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maiti</surname>
<given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <edition>1st ed</edition> (<publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>), <fpage>233</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>260</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-12-812986-9.00014-2</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kyalangalilwa</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boatwright</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Daru</surname>
<given-names>B. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maurin</surname>
<given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van der Bank</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Phylogenetic Position and Revised Classification ofAcacia s.l.(Fabaceae: Mimosoideae) in Africa, Including New Combinations inVachelliaandSenegalia</article-title>. <source>Bot. J.&#x20;Linn. Soc.</source> <volume>172</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>500</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>523</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/boj.12047</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lekberg</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koide</surname>
<given-names>R. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi, Rhizobia, Available Soil P and Nodulation of Groundnut (<italic>Arachis hypogaea</italic>) in Zimbabwe</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>110</volume>, <fpage>143</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>148</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2005.03.011</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van der Kuijp</surname>
<given-names>T. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>A Review of Soil Heavy Metal Pollution from Mines in China: Pollution and Health Risk Assessment</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>468-469</volume>, <fpage>843</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>853</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.090</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lyam</surname>
<given-names>P. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duque-Lazo</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Durka</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hauenschild</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schnitzler</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Michalak</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Genetic Diversity and Distribution of Senegalia senegal (L.) Britton under Climate Change Scenarios in West Africa</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>e0194726</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0194726</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Midgley</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bond</surname>
<given-names>W. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>A Synthesis of the Demography of African Acacias</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Trop. Ecol.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>871</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>886</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S026646740100164x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ndoye</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kane</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bakhoum</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sanon</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fall</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Diouf</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Response of <italic>Acacia senegal</italic> (L.) Willd. To Inoculation with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Isolates in Sterilized and Unsterilized Soils in Senegal</article-title>. <source>Agroforest Syst.</source> <volume>87</volume>, <fpage>941</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>952</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10457-013-9610-4</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ndoye</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fall</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sadio</surname>
<given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sy</surname>
<given-names>M. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Noba</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Diouf</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Effects of Dual Inoculation with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Rhizobia on <italic>Acacia senegal</italic> (L.) Willd. Seedling Growth and Soil Enzyme Activities in Senegal</article-title>. <source>Int. J.&#x20;Biosci.</source> <volume>6</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>36</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>48</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12692/ijb/6.2.36-48</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Novo</surname>
<given-names>L. A. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Castro</surname>
<given-names>P. M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alvarenga</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>da Silva</surname>
<given-names>E. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria-Assisted Phytoremediation of Mine Soils</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Bio-Geotechnologies for Mine Site Rehabilitation</source>. Editors <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Prasad</surname>
<given-names>M. N. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Favas</surname>
<given-names>P. J.&#x20;C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maiti</surname>
<given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <edition>1st ed</edition> (<publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>), <fpage>281</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>295</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-12-812986-9.00016-6</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Odee</surname>
<given-names>D. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilson</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Omondi</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perry</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cavers</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Rangewide Ploidy Variation and Evolution in Acacia senegal: a north-south divide?</article-title> <source>AoB Plants</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>plv011</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aobpla/plv011</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ohsowski</surname>
<given-names>B. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dunfield</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klironomos</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hart</surname>
<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Plant Response to Biochar, Compost, and Mycorrhizal Fungal Amendments in post-mine Sandpits</article-title>. <source>Restor. Ecol.</source> <volume>26</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>63</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>72</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/rec.12528</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Phillips</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hayman</surname>
<given-names>D. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1970</year>). <article-title>Improved Procedures for Clearing Roots and Staining Parasitic and Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi for Rapid Assessment of Infection</article-title>. <source>Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc.</source> <volume>55</volume>, <fpage>158</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>IN18</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0007-1536(70)80110-3</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Plenchette</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fortin</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Furlan</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1983</year>). <article-title>Growth Responses of Several Plant Species to Mycorrhizae in a Soil of Moderate P-Fertility</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>199</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>209</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02374780</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Raddad</surname>
<given-names>E. A. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Salih</surname>
<given-names>A. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fadl</surname>
<given-names>M. A. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaarakka</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luukkanen</surname>
<given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation in Eight Acacia senegal Provenances in Dryland Clays of the Blue Nile Sudan Estimated by the 15N Natural Abundance Method</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>275</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>261</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>269</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-005-2152-4</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rapai</surname>
<given-names>S. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hunt</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bainard</surname>
<given-names>L. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Turgeon</surname>
<given-names>M.-H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Newmaster</surname>
<given-names>S. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Soil Inoculation with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Promotes the Growth of Boreal Plant Communities in Gold Mine Overburden</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Rest.</source> <volume>34</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>216</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>224</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3368/er.34.3.216</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Revillini</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gehring</surname>
<given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johnson</surname>
<given-names>N. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The Role of Locally Adapted Mycorrhizas and Rhizobacteria in Plant-Soil Feedback Systems</article-title>. <source>Funct. Ecol.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>1086</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1098</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2435.12668</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rillig</surname>
<given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mummey</surname>
<given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Mycorrhizas and Soil Structure</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>171</volume>, <fpage>41</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>53</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01750.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rosenvald</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuznetsova</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ostonen</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Truu</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Truu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Uri</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Rhizosphere Effect and fine-root Morphological Adaptations in a Chronosequence of Silver Birch Stands on Reclaimed Oil Shale post-mining Areas</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Eng.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>1027</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1034</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.05.011</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sarasin</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Behavana</surname>
<given-names>I. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rakotoarimanga</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Randriatafika</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramanankierana</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rabenantoandro</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Inoculation of <italic>Mimosa Latispinosa</italic> Lam with the Commercial Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus <italic>Rhizophagus Irregularis</italic> DAOM197198, and <italic>Bradyrhizobium</italic> Spp. Under nursery Production Conditions in South-East Madagascar</article-title>. <source>Tropicultura</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>3</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25518/2295-8010.1119</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sene</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thiao</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Samba-Mbaye</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ndoye</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kane</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Diouf</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Response of Three Peanut Cultivars toward Inoculation with Two <italic>Bradyrhizobium</italic> Strains and an Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus in Senegal</article-title>. <source>Afr. J.&#x20;Microbiol. Res.</source> <volume>4</volume> (<issue>23</issue>), <fpage>2520</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2527</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5897/AJMR.9000631</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gupta</surname>
<given-names>V. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Soil Microbial Biomass: A Key Soil Driver in Management of Ecosystem Functioning</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>634</volume>, <fpage>497</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>500</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.373</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname>
<given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Read</surname>
<given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <source>Mycorrhizal Symbiosis</source>. <edition>2nd ed.</edition> <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname>
<given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Read</surname>
<given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <source>Mycorrhizal Symbiosis</source>. <edition>3rd ed.</edition> <publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stockinger</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walker</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sch&#xfc;&#xdf;ler</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>&#x27; Glomus Intraradices DAOM197198&#x27;, a Model Fungus in Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Research, Is Not Glomus Intraradices</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>183</volume>, <fpage>1176</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1187</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02874.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Straker</surname>
<given-names>C. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weiersbye</surname>
<given-names>I. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Witkowski</surname>
<given-names>E. T. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Status of Gold and Uranium Tailings and Surrounding Soils of South Africa&#x27;s Deep Level Gold Mines: I. Root Colonization and Spore Levels</article-title>. <source>South Afr. J.&#x20;Bot.</source> <volume>73</volume>, <fpage>218</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>225</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.sajb.2006.12.006</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Thavamani</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Samkumar</surname>
<given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Satheesh</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Subashchandrabose</surname>
<given-names>S. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramadass</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Naidu</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Microbes from Mined Sites: Harnessing Their Potential for Reclamation of Derelict Mine Sites</article-title>. <source>Environ. Pollut.</source> <volume>230</volume>, <fpage>495</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>505</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.056</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Van der Heijden</surname>
<given-names>M. G. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bakker</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Verwaal</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scheublin</surname>
<given-names>T. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rutten</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van Logtestijn</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Symbiotic Bacteria as a Determinant of Plant Community Structure and Plant Productivity in Dune Grassland</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>178</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>187</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00086.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vincent</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jourand</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Juillot</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ducousso</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Galiana</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Biological <italic>In Situ</italic> Nitrogen Fixation by an Acacia Species Reaches Optimal Rates on Extremely Contrasted Soils</article-title>. <source>Eur. J.&#x20;Soil Biol.</source> <volume>86</volume>, <fpage>52</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>62</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejsobi.2018.03.003</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vincent</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1970</year>). <source>International Biological Program</source>. <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Blackwell Scientific Publications</publisher-name>, <fpage>164</fpage>.<article-title>A Manual for the Practical Study of Root-Nodule Bacteria. IBP Handbook 15.</article-title> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Occurrence of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Mining-Impacted Sites and Their Contribution to Ecological Restoration: Mechanisms and Applications</article-title>. <source>Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Tech.</source> <volume>47</volume> (<issue>20</issue>), <fpage>1901</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1957</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10643389.2017.1400853</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wulandari</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saridi</surname>
<given-names>C. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tawaraya</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Inoculation Improves <italic>Albizia Saman</italic> and <italic>Paraserianthes Falcataria</italic> Growth in post-opencast Coal Mine Field in East Kalimantan, Indonesia</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manag.</source> <volume>376</volume>, <fpage>67</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>73</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2016.06.008</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>