<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Environ. Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Environmental Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Environ. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-665X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">857233</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fenvs.2022.857233</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Environmental Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Nutrient Management Drives the Direction and Magnitude of Nitrous Oxide Flux in Crop Residue-Returned Soil Under Different Soil Moisture</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Lenka et&#x20;al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">N<sub>2</sub>O Flux Under Residue Return</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Lenka</surname>
<given-names>Sangeeta</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/126816/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Choudhary</surname>
<given-names>Rajesh</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1643781/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Lenka</surname>
<given-names>Narendra Kumar</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1581375/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Saha</surname>
<given-names>Jayant Kumar</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/93429/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Amat</surname>
<given-names>Dolamani</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1719956/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Patra</surname>
<given-names>Ashok Kumar</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/786733/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gami</surname>
<given-names>Vijay</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>Dharmendra</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1300277/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>ICAR- Indian Institute of Soil Science</institution>, <institution>Nabibagh</institution>, <addr-line>Bhopal</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Department of Soil Science and Agriculture Chemistry</institution>, <institution>College of Agriculture, RVSKVV</institution>, <addr-line>Gwalior</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1142288/overview">Lourdes Morillas</ext-link>, University of Lisbon, Portugal</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Reviewed by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1641305/overview">Curtis Dell</ext-link>, United&#x20;States Department of Agriculture, United&#x20;States</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1596254/overview">Segun Oladele</ext-link>, Adekunle Ajasin University, Nigeria</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Sangeeta Lenka, <email>sangeeta_2@rediffmail.com</email>; Narendra Kumar Lenka, <email>nklenka@rediffmail.com</email>
</corresp>
<fn fn-type="other">
<p>This article was submitted to Soil Processes, a section of the journal Frontiers in Environmental Science</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>22</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>857233</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>18</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>28</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2022 Lenka, Choudhary, Lenka, Saha, Amat, Patra, Gami and Singh.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Lenka, Choudhary, Lenka, Saha, Amat, Patra, Gami and Singh</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these&#x20;terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Crop residues as key organic carbon inputs have the potential for soil carbon sequestration. However, previous studies have shown an inconsistent effect of residue return on the direction and magnitude of soil nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emission. We used a laboratory-based soil incubation study to test the response of N<sub>2</sub>O emission to crop residue type, soil moisture, and how nutrient management modulates these responses. In this study, we incorporated crop residues with different qualities (wheat, rice, soybean, and maize) at two soil moisture contents {80% field capacity (FC) and 60% FC} and under seven nutrient levels: N0P0K0 (no nutrients), N0PK, N100PK, N150PK, N100PK &#x2b; manure@ 5&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, N100PK &#x2b; biochar@ 5&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, and N150PK &#x2b; biochar@ 5&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. The results demonstrated significant (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.01) differences in the magnitude of N<sub>2</sub>O emissions among treatments. However, only the interaction effect of residue &#xd7; nutrient and nutrient &#xd7; moisture was significant (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05). N100PK and N150PK at 80% FC mitigated N<sub>2</sub>O emission by approximately 20% in wheat residue-amended soil (<italic>cf</italic>. control soil without residue). In contrast, maize residue amendment (<italic>cf.</italic> control soil) increased N<sub>2</sub>O emission by 130% under N0P0K0 and 80% FC. Residue effects were negatively correlated with the C:N ratio, and a strong positive correlation (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.01) was obtained between N<sub>2</sub>O emission and CO<sub>2</sub> respiration, labile carbon, mineral N, and residue total nitrogen (TN). When no nutrients were added, N<sub>2</sub>O emission was higher in residue returned soil. However, cumulative fluxes of N<sub>2</sub>O decreased by 6&#x2013;17% when maize and wheat residues (<italic>cf.</italic> control soil) were applied with nutrients. Negative fluxes of N<sub>2</sub>O indicating consumption were observed in every treatment after 57&#xa0;days of incubation and were most pronounced in control soil without residue and nutrients. Decreasing the soil moisture from 80% FC to 60% FC, the N<sub>2</sub>O consumption rate increased by 6.6&#x20;times across residue types and nutrient management. The regression analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM) results showed that residue TN, soil CO<sub>2</sub> emission, NO<sub>3</sub>-N, and labile SOC were the key predictor variables and could explain 82% variability in the soil N<sub>2</sub>O emission in the Vertisols of Central India. The results suggested that nutrient addition (NPK) could alter the magnitude and direction of soil N<sub>2</sub>O flux by residue type and soil moisture by influencing the underlying soil microbial processes of the C and N cycle in the Vertisol of subtropical India.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>greenhouse gas</kwd>
<kwd>residue quality</kwd>
<kwd>C:N ratio</kwd>
<kwd>climate change</kwd>
<kwd>soil respiration</kwd>
<kwd>CO<sub>2</sub> flux</kwd>
<kwd>global warming potential</kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Sustainable mitigation strategies to reduce soil nitrous oxide emission are vital for cleaner and carbon-neutral agricultural production. It is also because nitrous oxide is an important greenhouse gas (GHG), and the agricultural soils contribute approximately 78% of total anthropogenic N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, with a global warming potential of 265&#x20;times greater than CO<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Mutegi et&#x20;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Sangeeta Lenka et&#x20;al., 2017</xref>). Moreover, N<sub>2</sub>O is the main source of stratospheric nitric oxide, which damages the ozone layer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Lenka et&#x20;al., 2020a</xref>). Increasing crop production to meet the growing food demand of the rising population could generate crop residues as high as 4 billion metric tonnes annually globally (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Chen et&#x20;al., 2021</xref>). Crop residue incorporation in the soil is a sustainable and eco-friendly residue recycling and reuse mechanism in agriculture. It improves plant growth by enhancing soil carbon sequestration and nutrient cycling by driving soil processes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">Wei et&#x20;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Lenka et&#x20;al., 2020b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Jin et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Wu et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>). In addition, its beneficial effect is well proven and documented for soil and water conservation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kaleeem Abbasi et&#x20;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Nath et&#x20;al., 2021</xref>). However, incorporating crop residues in the soil could be a potential source of agricultural N<sub>2</sub>O emissions during decomposition and mineralization. The N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from crop residue return could offset the beneficial effects of crop residue recycling in agriculture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Wang and Luo, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hu et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>). As the emphasis on the surface retention or incorporation of crop residue is growing with the increase in area under conservation agriculture globally, it is essential to devise strategies for reducing GHG N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from crop residue return.</p>
<p>The crucial factors governing N<sub>2</sub>O emission from residue could be <italic>1</italic>) residue quality, <italic>2</italic>) soil properties, <italic>3</italic>) soil environment (temperature and moisture), and <italic>4</italic>) exogenous nutrient input (inorganic/organic). Previous studies have reported inconsistent effects of crop residue return on N<sub>2</sub>O emission, i.e.,&#x20;either positive (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Velthof et&#x20;al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Wang et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Venterea et&#x20;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chen et&#x20;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Gao et&#x20;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Wang and Luo, 2018</xref>) or negative and no effect (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Jianwen et&#x20;al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Mutegi et&#x20;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chen et&#x20;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Hu et&#x20;al., 2013</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Charles et&#x20;al., 2017</xref>). The crop C:N ratio, cellulose, lignin, total carbon, and nitrogen concentration are essential biochemical compositions governing the residue mineralization and the associated N<sub>2</sub>O emission. In their meta-analysis, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Shan and Yan (2013)</xref> showed that the N<sub>2</sub>O emission from soil was negatively correlated with the C:N ratio of residue added, indicating that crop residue with a wider C:N ratio is more effective in reducing N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. Apart from the crop C:N ratio, other quality parameters regulating N<sub>2</sub>O emissions are content of total nitrogen, lignin, cellulose, polyphenols, lignin/N ratio, and soluble C (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Muhammad et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chen et&#x20;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kaleeem Abbasi et&#x20;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hu et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>). The high C: N ratio of the crop input compared with soil microbial biomass destabilizes the soil and microbial nutrient stoichiometry that alters the SOC and residue C mineralization and the resultant N<sub>2</sub>O emission (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Velthof et&#x20;al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Toma and Hatano, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Muhammad et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chen et&#x20;al., 2013</xref>). The variable effect of crop residue C may arise because residue C regulates the same enzyme differently being dependent on concentration, or the same residue C may affect different reductases of the N cycle differently (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Giles et&#x20;al., 2012</xref>).</p>
<p>The shifts in nutrient stoichiometry after residue addition are critical to soil N mineralization and immobilization and the associated N<sub>2</sub>O emissions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Giles et&#x20;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Thomson et&#x20;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Wu et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>). Evidence suggests that nutrient inputs drive N mineralization from crop residue and the subsequent N losses (N<sub>2</sub>O, NO<sub>3</sub> leaching, and volatilization) or use (crop uptake) from the soil system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Rahn et&#x20;al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Toma and Hatano, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Muhammad et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Li et&#x20;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Xu et&#x20;al., 2021</xref>). Exogenous nutrient input with crop residues influences the magnitude of N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes by alleviating nutrient limitation to soil microbes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Finn et&#x20;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Fang et&#x20;al., 2018a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Soong et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>). The input of crop residue with only inorganic nutrients or integrated use of nutrients was reported to either increase (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Baggs et&#x20;al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Toma and Hatano, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Datta et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Lenka et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Fang et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>), decrease, or no effect (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Al-Kaisi and Yin, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Toma and Hatano, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Fang et&#x20;al., 2018b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Datta et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hu et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>) on SOC mineralization. Mechanisms attributed to the variable effect of crop residue addition with exogenous nutrient on the magnitude and direction of SOC mineralization is that <italic>1</italic>) crop residue inputs affect the magnitude of native SOC mineralization called priming effect compared with no residue input (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">Zimmerman et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Fang et&#x20;al., 2018a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Lenka et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>); <italic>2</italic>) N addition with crop residue increases microbial carbon use efficiency of residue carbon (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">Zang et&#x20;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Mehnaz et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Fang et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>); <italic>3</italic>) reduced mineral nitrogen changes the soil microbial community structure that mineralizes the native SOC more to meet their requirement of growing energy and nutrition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">Zang et&#x20;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Li et&#x20;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">Zhang et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>); <italic>4</italic>) suppresses the SOC mineralization through reduced extracellular enzyme activity. Therefore, underlying mechanisms driving N<sub>2</sub>O emission from crop residue return are complex and remain uncertain that demands further investigation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hu et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>In addition to the chemical composition of crop residue and nutrient input, environmental factors such as soil moisture regulates the oxygen diffusion rates in soil, a determinant for nitrification and denitrification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Wang et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Venterea et&#x20;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chen et&#x20;al., 2013</xref>). Generally, denitrification is the primary source of N<sub>2</sub>O production in soils under anaerobic conditions accounting for 1&#x2013;100% of the total N<sub>2</sub>O production. However, nitrification dominated the N<sub>2</sub>O production under aerobic conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Giles et&#x20;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hu et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">Wang et&#x20;al., 2021</xref>). Soil moisture is the key factor governing soil&#x2019;s aerobic/anaerobic status through the water-filled pore space. Under the aerobic conditions, return of crop residues could further modify the microbial oxygen demand due to enhanced microbial activity in response to high residue C, which is a key factor driving soil nitrification and denitrification for N<sub>2</sub>O emission (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Baggs et&#x20;al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Toma and Hatano, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hu et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Ciarlo et&#x20;al. (2007)</xref> found that the N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes were greater at 80% than 60% water-filled porosity space (WFPS) when NO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup> concentration was nonlimiting. Therefore, assessing the magnitude of soil N<sub>2</sub>O emission in response to different crop residue inputs and nutrient management under specified soil moisture is essential for identifying management practices vital to mitigate GHG emissions and global changes.</p>
<p>The individual effect of crop residue, nutrient management, and soil moisture on N<sub>2</sub>O emissions was well documented by previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Feng et&#x20;al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Toma and Hatano 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Mutegi et&#x20;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Ponce-Mendoza et&#x20;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chen et&#x20;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Shan and Yan 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Gao et&#x20;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Lan et&#x20;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Kumar et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Takakai et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Tao et&#x20;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Hongjin Zhang et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Liyanage et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Wu et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">Yujin Zhang et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Li et&#x20;al., 2021</xref>). However, the interactive effect of crop residues, nutrients, and soil moisture driving the magnitude and direction of soil N<sub>2</sub>O emission and underlying mechanisms is lacking. Therefore, the objectives of the present investigation were to <italic>1</italic>) quantify the interactive effect of crop residues, nutrients, and soil moisture on nitrogen mineralization and related soil properties, <italic>2</italic>) assess the effect of crop residue return on N<sub>2</sub>O emission from Vertisols under different nutrient management and soil moisture, and <italic>3</italic>) quantify the relative importance of soil and residue properties in predicting soil N<sub>2</sub>O emission.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s2">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>Study Site</title>
<p>We used a laboratory-based soil incubation approach to test whether crop residue addition in the soil can affect nitrous oxide emissions at different moisture contents and how these responses are modulated by nutrient management. In this study, we incorporated crop residues (wheat, rice, soybean, and maize) with two contrasting soil moisture contents (see the following) at seven nutrient levels (see the following). The surface soil (0&#x2013;15&#xa0;cm) used in this study was collected from a long-term experimental field under conservation tillage and nutrient management at ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil Science, Bhopal, India. The experimental site is located at 23&#xb0;15&#x2032;N latitude and 77&#xb0;25&#x2032;E longitude, at 427&#xa0;m above the mean sea level and is characterized by a humid subtropical climate with mild, dry winters and hot summers followed by a humid monsoon season. For other experimental details and initial soil properties of the site, a reference is made to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Singh et&#x20;al. (2020</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">2014)</xref>. The on-site soil is deep Vertisols (Isohyperthermic Typic Haplustert) with clay texture (52% clay), bulk density of 1.34&#xa0;Mg/m<sup>3</sup> at 0.27&#xa0;g/g soil water content, and total soil organic carbon content of 0.99% (0&#x2013;15&#xa0;cm soil depth). The soil is neutral to alkaline in reaction (pH-7.85) with an electrical conductivity of 0.3&#xa0;ds/m and Ca<sup>2&#x2b;</sup> as the dominant exchangeable cation in the Ap horizon.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>Incubation Experimental Detail</title>
<p>The surface soil (0&#x2013;15&#xa0;cm) was collected after the wheat harvest in 2020 from a 12-year-old conservation tillage experiment in a soybean&#x2013;wheat cropping system under reduced tillage with 30% residue return plus the recommended dose of nutrients. For soybean, the recommended dose was 30:60:30 and for wheat, it was 100:60:30&#xa0;kg&#xa0;N&#x2013;P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>&#x2013;K<sub>2</sub>O per ha. All visible roots and crop residue materials were removed from the collected soil, and the samples were passed through a 2-mm sieve to remove larger residue fragments and particles. Soils were stored at 4&#xb0;C until further analysis. The crop residues of rice, maize, soybean, and wheat used in this study were air-dried, and the samples of crop residues were milled and sieved to 2&#xa0;mm. The subsamples of the residues were dried at 65&#xb0;C for 48&#xa0;h for gravimetric water content assessment and ground and sieved to &#x3c;2&#xa0;mm for chemical analysis. The concentration of C and N in the initial bulk soil, the residues, manure, and biochar was determined using an elemental analyzer (NC analyzer, Thermo Fisher, Flash 2000 model). The lignin and cellulose contents were determined by the acid detergent fiber method using the 1-mm-sized materials (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Rowland and Roberts, 1994</xref>). The moisture content of the sieved material was determined by oven-drying at 105&#xb0;C overnight. Selected properties of residues, sugarcane bagasse biochar, farmyard manure, and soil used in this study are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table&#x20;1</xref>. For further details of biochar, reference is made to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Raul et&#x20;al. (2020)</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Selected chemical properties of the residues, biochar, manure, and soil used in this&#x20;study.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Crop residue/manure/soil/biochar</th>
<th align="center">Total nitrogen (%)</th>
<th align="center">Total organic carbon/total carbon (%)</th>
<th align="center">C:N</th>
<th align="center">Lignin (%, w/w)</th>
<th align="center">Cellulose (%, w/w)</th>
<th align="center">Lignin/nitrogen</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Soil</td>
<td align="center">0.09&#x20;&#xb1; 0.004</td>
<td align="center">1.08&#x20;&#xb1; 0.07</td>
<td align="center">12</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Manure</td>
<td align="center">3.53&#x20;&#xb1; 0.14</td>
<td align="center">28.4&#x20;&#xb1; 0.12</td>
<td align="center">8</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Biochar</td>
<td align="center">1.40&#x20;&#xb1; 0.09</td>
<td align="center">63.3&#x20;&#xb1; 0.21</td>
<td align="center">45</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Wheat straw</td>
<td align="center">0.34&#x20;&#xb1; 0.08</td>
<td align="center">39.9&#x20;&#xb1; 0.19</td>
<td align="center">76</td>
<td align="center">13.1&#x20;&#xb1; 0.59</td>
<td align="center">56.0&#x20;&#xb1; 0.34</td>
<td align="center">24.9&#x20;&#xb1; 3.26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Rice straw</td>
<td align="center">0.71&#x20;&#xb1; 0.11</td>
<td align="center">35.8&#x20;&#xb1; 0.11</td>
<td align="center">50</td>
<td align="center">13.5&#x20;&#xb1; 0.46</td>
<td align="center">29.0&#x20;&#xb1; 0.80</td>
<td align="center">18.9&#x20;&#xb1; 2.73</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Soybean straw</td>
<td align="center">0.58&#x20;&#xb1; 0.12</td>
<td align="center">35.4&#x20;&#xb1; 0.15</td>
<td align="center">61</td>
<td align="center">15.4&#x20;&#xb1; 0.63</td>
<td align="center">42.3&#x20;&#xb1; 0.78</td>
<td align="center">6.9&#x20;&#xb1; 0.24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Maize straw</td>
<td align="center">0.60&#x20;&#xb1; 0.09</td>
<td align="center">38.9&#x20;&#xb1; 0.19</td>
<td align="center">65</td>
<td align="center">9.0&#x20;&#xb1; 0.31</td>
<td align="center">49.7&#x20;&#xb1; 0.51</td>
<td align="center">15.0&#x20;&#xb1; 2.15</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Total carbon in organic materials; total organic carbon in the soil; C:N, carbon and nitrogen&#x20;ratio.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The soil was preincubated for 10&#xa0;days at room temperature and 70% of the two moisture levels to minimize the possible disturbance effect during soil sample preparation. After preincubation, the crop residues (&#x3c;2&#xa0;mm) were thoroughly mixed with soil (&#x3c;2&#xa0;mm) and homogenized before incubation. In brief, the treatments consisted of <italic>1</italic>) 20&#xa0;g soils (dry weight basis) added with wheat, maize, soybean, or rice straw residues at the rate of 2.23&#xa0;mg&#xa0;g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil, corresponding to 5&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> residue incorporation and <italic>2</italic>) 20&#xa0;g soil (dry weight basis) without crop residue (control). The treatments were taken in 460-ml glass jars. The control soil and residue-incorporated soil were given seven nutrient addition treatments: N0P0K0 (no nutrient), N0PK, N100PK, N150PK, N100PK &#x2b; manure at 5&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, N100PK &#x2b; biochar@ 5&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, and N150PK &#x2b; biochar@ 5&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>
<sub>.</sub> The N100 and N150 denote the rates of 100 and 150&#xa0;kg&#xa0;N&#xa0;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. Phosphorus (P) at 22&#xa0;kg/ha and potassium (K) at 21&#xa0;kg/ha were added to each nutrient treatment except N0P0K0 to study the effect of increasing N levels. The P and K additions were made to maintain an ideal N:P:K ratio of 4:2:1 corresponding to 100&#xa0;kg&#xa0;N/ha. The N addition was made through AR-grade ammonium nitrate, whereas P and K additions were made through potassium dihydrogen phosphate. All the nutrients were applied through distilled water, and then the incubation moisture level was adjusted to 80% field capacity (FC) and 60% FC with distilled water. The field capacity of the soil was determined at matric potentials of &#x2212;33&#xa0;kPa using sieved (&#x3c;2&#xa0;mm) soil samples in pressure plate extractors (Soil Moisture Equipment Corp., Santa Barbara, CA, United&#x20;States). A blank glass jar without soil or residue was included to account for the atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O concentration present in the headspace of the incubation jars and for calculating the amount of evolved gases from the soil or soil plus residue treatments. All treatments and blank were replicated six times and incubated under two different moisture contents: 80% FC and 60% FC at 30&#xb0;C. The incubation temperature of 30&#xb0;C was based on long-term annual average temperature of the study region. Soil moisture was adjusted to 80% FC and 60% FC at the start of the incubation and maintained periodically throughout the experiment by weighing the jars and adding water to replace water lost to evaporation during each gas sampling&#x20;time.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>Greenhouse Gas Sampling and Measurements</title>
<p>Headspace gases were sampled at regular intervals on fixed days (0, 1, 4, 10, 17, 26, 33, 40, 47, 57, 67, 77 and 87&#xa0;days of incubation). The gas samples were drawn from the incubation jars using a syringe and immediately transferred to an evacuated glass vial (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Lenka et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>). After all the jars were sampled, jars were opened for 30&#xa0;min to refresh headspace oxygen and CO<sub>2</sub> to ambient concentration and then hermetically resealed with the aluminum caps. The concentration of total headspace CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O was measured <italic>via</italic> gas chromatography (Agilent Technologies model 7890A). The unequal interval was designed to capture the asymptotic decrease commonly observed in incubation experiments. The N<sub>2</sub>O/CO<sub>2</sub> flux rate was calculated as the change in headspace N<sub>2</sub>O/CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (&#x3bc;g N or mg&#xa0;C) per kg soil (dry wt. equivalent) per unit incubation time (day). The ideal gas law was used to convert flux values from a volumetric basis to a mass basis. Cumulative CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions were calculated by adding the fluxes from each measurement time. Three replicates were destructively harvested at 57&#xa0;days and stored at &#x2212;20&#xb0;C for analysis of soil mineral N, enzymes, and labile SOC. The three remaining replicates were monitored for GHG fluxes until they were destructively harvested at 87&#xa0;days. Apparent residue C mineralization was calculated as the change in CO<sub>2</sub> emission between residue-amended and control soil samples at the respective nutrient&#x20;level.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-4">
<title>Post-Incubation Soil Analysis</title>
<p>After 57 and 87&#xa0;days of incubation, soil samples were analyzed for soil mineral N (NO<sub>3</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub>, and NH<sub>4</sub>), soil dehydrogenase activity (DHA), and labile SOC following standard analytical procedures. A part of the moist composite soil samples was used for the determination of gravimetric moisture content by the oven-dry method, and the rest of the samples were extracted immediately with 2&#xa0;M KCl (1:10 soil:extractant ratio). The extracts were analyzed for NH<sub>4</sub>-N, NO<sub>2</sub>-N, and NO<sub>3</sub>-N using the indophenol blue method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Kempers, 1974</xref>) and copperized cadmium reduction method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Jackson et&#x20;al., 1975</xref>). In brief, soil nitrite (NO<sub>2</sub>-N) was determined by diazotizing with sulfanilamide and coupling with N-(1-naphthyl)-ethylene diamine dihydrochloride to form a pink-colored azo dye that is measured colorimetrically (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Jackson et&#x20;al., 1975</xref>).</p>
<p>Dehydrogenase activity was estimated by monitoring the rate of production of triphenyl formazon (TPF) from triphenyl tetrazolium chloride used as an electron acceptor. The method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Klein et&#x20;al. (1971)</xref> was followed for the assay of dehydrogenase activity as outlined in the following. In a 15-ml screw-capped tube, one gram of air-dried soil was placed. To this, 0.2&#xa0;ml of 3% triphenyl tetrazolium chloride and 0.5&#xa0;ml of 1% glucose were added, and the tubes were incubated at 28&#xb0;C for 24&#xa0;h. After incubation, 10&#xa0;ml of methanol was added and shaken for precisely 1&#xa0;min. It was allowed to stand in the dark for 6&#xa0;h. The color intensity developed was measured at 485&#xa0;nm (blue filter). From the standard curve, drawn in the range of 0.004&#x2013;0.4&#xa0;mg TPF per 10&#xa0;ml of methanol, the TPF produced in the samples was computed. Dehydrogenase activity was expressed as TPF formed per gram soil for 24&#xa0;h on an oven-dry weight&#x20;basis.</p>
<p>Labile soil organic carbon was computed in the soil samples after an incubation period of 57 and 87&#xa0;days by the potassium permanganate oxidation (0.33&#xa0;M KMnO<sub>4</sub>) method as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Blair et&#x20;al. (1995)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Islam et&#x20;al (2003)</xref>. In brief, 5&#xa0;g of the soil sample was weighed in a centrifuge tube, and then 20&#xa0;ml of 0.02&#xa0;M KMnO<sub>4</sub> was added. After shaking it for 2&#xa0;min on a horizontal shaker (120&#xa0;rpm), it was centrifuged at 4000&#x2013;5000&#xa0;rpm to clear the supernatant. Then, 1&#xa0;ml of the clear supernatant solution was taken in a 25-ml volumetric flask, and by taking 200&#xa0;&#xb5;l in microplate, absorbance was read at 550&#xa0;nm on a microplate reader.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-5">
<title>Statistical Analysis</title>
<p>All data were tested for normality and homogeneity of variance. Log-transformation was applied if the transformation improved the normality and variance substantially. The data were statistically analyzed using SPSS software (version 21.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, United&#x20;States); the significance level was set at <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.05. As appropriate, the data were analyzed using a general linear model univariate and repeated measures ANOVA. Tukey&#x2019;s HSD multiple comparisons were used to compare the main factors&#x2019; means and obtain the homogenous subsets. We applied Fisher&#x2019;s protected least significant difference (LSD) for the multiple mean comparisons between treatments when the interaction effect was significant. The Pearson correlation (two-tailed significance) and stepwise multiple regression analysis were applied to detect the predictors of soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was performed to determine how crop residue and soil properties estimate soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions using AMOS 26.0 (Amos Development Corporation, Meadville, PA, United&#x20;States). The Chi-square (&#x3c7;<sup>2</sup>) statistic of the absolute model fit and various descriptive model fit indices were used to validate the proposed model. The model was considered to have a good fit when &#x3c7;<sup>2</sup> &#x3c; 5.0, <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3e; 0.05, RMSEA&#x3c; 0.08, AGFI&#x2265; 0.90, indicating that the proposed model produces a population covariance matrix consistent with the sample covariance matrix (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Chen et&#x20;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>Soil Nitrogen Mineralization</title>
<p>The soil NO<sub>3</sub>-N decreased significantly (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05) in all residue-amended soil (<italic>cf.</italic> control soil) across nutrient management and soil moisture, demonstrating immobilization by these materials (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1</xref> and <xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Tables S1&#x2013;S4</xref>) at 57 and 87&#xa0;days of incubation, except soybean residue-amended soil at 87&#xa0;days. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) for mineral N (NO<sub>3</sub>-N<bold>,</bold> NO<sub>2</sub>-N, and NH<sub>4</sub>-N) to interpret the main and interactive effects of residue type, soil moisture, nutrient, and repeated measures ANOVA for the two time periods are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Tables 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>.The content of soil NO<sub>3</sub>-N ranked wheat &#x3c; soybean &#x3c; rice &#x3c; maize &#x3c; control soil at 57&#xa0;days and wheat &#x3c; rice &#x3c; maize &#x3c; control soil &#x3c; soybean at 87&#xa0;days of incubation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1</xref>). Nitrogen application with inorganic (P and K) and organic (manure and biochar) nutrients narrowed down the difference between the control (without residue) and residue-amended soil and increased the NO<sub>3</sub>-N. Across nutrient management, the NO<sub>3</sub>-N concentration ranged from 35.9 to 108.0&#xa0;mg&#xa0;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil (control soil), 21.0&#x2013;68.8&#xa0;mg&#xa0;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil (wheat), 21.5&#x2013;95.5&#xa0;mg&#xa0;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil (rice), 42.6&#x2013;133.1&#xa0;mg&#xa0;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil (soybean), and 30.0&#x2013;115.3&#xa0;mg&#xa0;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil (maize). Overall, in the nutrient management treatments, amendment with wheat and rice residues resulted in N immobilization, but soybean and maize residue addition produced net N mineralization. Over the incubation period, the mean cumulative soil NH<sub>4</sub>-N and NO<sub>3</sub>-N concentrations increased the response to nitrogen application. In general, biochar application at 5&#xa0;Mg&#xa0;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> with addition of N (N100PK and N150PK) enhanced the NH<sub>4</sub>-N concentration as compared to control and residue-amended soil samples.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Soil NO<sub>3</sub>-N (mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil) as influenced by residues and nutrients at 57 and 87&#xa0;days of incubation under 80 and 60% FC soil moisture. Details of statistical analysis are provided in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Tables 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-857233-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>ANOVA for nitrate N, Nitrite N, ammonical N, and total mineral N at 57 and 87&#xa0;days of incubation.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Source of variation</th>
<th align="center">Degrees of freedom</th>
<th align="center">NO<sub>3</sub>-N (57&#xa0;days)</th>
<th align="center">NO<sub>3</sub>-N (87&#xa0;days)</th>
<th align="center">NO<sub>2</sub>-N (57&#xa0;days)</th>
<th align="center">NO<sub>2</sub>-N (87&#xa0;days)</th>
<th align="center">NH<sub>4</sub>-N (57&#xa0;days)</th>
<th align="center">NH<sub>4</sub>-N (87&#xa0;days)</th>
<th align="center">Total min. N (57&#xa0;days)</th>
<th align="center">Total min. N (87&#xa0;days)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td colspan="8" align="center">Significance (<italic>p</italic> value)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Residue</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.002</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.011</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Nutrient</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.042</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.003</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.005</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Moisture</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.000</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Residue &#xd7; nutrient</td>
<td align="center">24</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.015</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.066</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.014</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.005</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.978</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.639</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Residue &#xd7; moisture</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.565</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.002</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.041</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.051</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.915</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.682</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Nutrient &#xd7; moisture</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.003</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.018</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.131</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Residue &#xd7; nutrient &#xd7; moisture</td>
<td align="center">24</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.489</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.124</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.009</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.008</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.997</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.996</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Error</td>
<td align="center">140</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Total</td>
<td align="center">210</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Corrected total</td>
<td align="center">209</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Results of <italic>p</italic> value based on repeated measures ANOVA for nitrate N, Nitrite N, ammonical N, total mineral N, dehydrogenase activity (DHA), and labile SOC, CO<sub>2</sub>, and N<sub>2</sub>O emission during the incubation period.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Source of variation</th>
<th align="center">DF</th>
<th align="center">NO<sub>3</sub>-N</th>
<th align="center">NO<sub>2</sub>-N</th>
<th align="center">NH<sub>4</sub>-N</th>
<th align="center">Total mineral N</th>
<th align="center">DHA</th>
<th align="center">Labile SOC</th>
<th align="center">N<sub>2</sub>O</th>
<th align="center">CO<sub>2</sub>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Time</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.649</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Time &#xd7; residue</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.005</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.059</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.073</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.322</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.169</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Time &#xd7; nutrient</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.162</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.631</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.153</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.004</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.091</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Time &#xd7; moisture</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.243</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.703</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.511</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.499</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.014</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Time &#xd7; residue &#xd7; nutrient</td>
<td align="center">24</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.007</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.005</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.763</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.926</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.037</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.052</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Time &#xd7; residue &#xd7; moisture</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.261</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.883</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.101</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.005</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.019</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Time &#xd7; nutrient &#xd7; moisture</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.009</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.495</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.745</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.006</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.005</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.074</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Time &#xd7; residue &#xd7; nutrient &#xd7; moisture</td>
<td align="center">24</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.679</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.998</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.992</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.002</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.027</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.064</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Error (time)</td>
<td align="center">140</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>During the 87&#xa0;days of incubation, the total mineral N (NH<sub>4</sub> &#x2b; NO<sub>3</sub> &#x2b; NO<sub>2</sub>) in the residue &#x2b; nutrient treatments decreased by 10&#x2013;27% (wheat), 14&#x2013;20% (rice), 3&#x2013;14% (soybean), and 6&#x2013;17% (maize) as compared to control soil &#x2b; nutrient treatment, at 80% FC. Similarly, at 60% FC, residue &#x2b; nutrient treatments decreased the total mineral N compared with control soil &#x2b; nutrient treatments. In contrast, soybean and maize addition produced net N mineralization in N100PK &#x2b; manure, N100PK &#x2b; biochar, and N150PK &#x2b; biochar treatments, at 80% FC and only soybean at 60% FC moisture content. Overall, soil mineral N and total and individual pools (NH<sub>4</sub> NO<sub>3,</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub>) decreased significantly (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.01) by reducing the soil moisture from 80 to 60% FC in all nutrient management treatments except a few due to significant nutrient &#xd7; moisture interaction (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c;&#x20;0.01).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>Nitrous Oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) Fluxes</title>
<p>Overall, the N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes were significantly affected by nutrient management, residue type, soil moisture, and the interaction of residue &#xd7; nutrient and nutrient &#xd7; moisture (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table&#x20;4</xref>). The N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes over time were initially high, reached their maximum on fourth day (80% FC) and first day (60% FC) of incubation, then decreased exponentially, and was near zero or negative after the 57th day of incubation across nutrient management (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figures S1, S2</xref>). Therefore, cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O flux after 87&#xa0;days of incubation was less than that at 57&#xa0;days. The percent change in cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes at 87&#xa0;days of incubation over 57&#xa0;days reflects that the N<sub>2</sub>O consumption was significantly (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.001) influenced by the interactive effect of residues, nutrients, and moisture (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Table&#x20;5</xref>). Integrated use of residue and nutrients reduced the consumption of N<sub>2</sub>O across soil moisture. Therefore, control soil without residue had significantly higher N<sub>2</sub>O consumption than soil amended with crop residue. On decreasing the soil moisture from 80% FC to 60% FC, the N<sub>2</sub>O consumption rate increased by 6.6&#x20;times across residue types and nutrient management. Across nutrient management and soil moisture, the N<sub>2</sub>O consumption followed the order control soil&#x3e;maize&#x2248;wheat&#x3e;rice&#x3e;soybean.</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>ANOVA for cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O emission and soil CO<sub>2</sub> respiration after 57 and 87&#xa0;days of incubation.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Source of variation</th>
<th align="center">DF</th>
<th align="center">Cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O emission (57&#xa0;days)</th>
<th align="center">Cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O emission (87&#xa0;days)</th>
<th align="center">Cumulative CO<sub>2</sub> emission (57&#xa0;days)</th>
<th align="center">Cumulative CO<sub>2</sub> emission (87&#xa0;days)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Residue</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.002</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Nutrient</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.015</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Moisture</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Residue &#xd7; nutrient</td>
<td align="center">24</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.027</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.010</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Residue &#xd7; moisture</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.163</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.866</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Nutrient &#xd7; moisture</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.028</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.046</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Residue &#xd7; nutrient &#xd7; moisture</td>
<td align="center">24</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.105</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.201</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.011</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.036</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Error</td>
<td align="center">140</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Total</td>
<td align="center">210</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Corrected total</td>
<td align="center">209</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
<label>TABLE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Percent change in cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes at 87&#xa0;days of incubation over 57&#xa0;days as influenced by residues and nutrients.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th rowspan="2" align="left">Nutrient management</th>
<th align="center">Control soil</th>
<th align="center">Wheat</th>
<th align="center">Rice</th>
<th align="center">Soybean</th>
<th align="center">Maize</th>
<th align="center">Mean</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th colspan="6" align="center">60% FC</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">N0P0K0</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;30</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;32</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;7</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;14</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;21</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">N0PK</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;25</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;37</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;16</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;17</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;17</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">N100PK</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;17</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;26</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;21</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;15</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;22</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">N150PK</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;23</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;20</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;25</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;25</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;24</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">N100PK &#x2b; manure</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;17</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;16</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;15</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;14</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;13</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;15</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">N100PK &#x2b; biochar</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;27</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;17</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;16</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;18</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;22</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">N150PK&#x2b; biochar</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;34</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;18</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;15</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;13</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;23</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;21</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Mean</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;25</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;24</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;18</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;16</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;20</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td colspan="6" align="center">80% FC</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">N0P0K0</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;29</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;9</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;8</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;5</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">N0PK</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;7</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;6</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;8</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;9</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">N100PK</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;9</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;1</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;3</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">N150PK</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;5</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;3</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;4</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">N100PK &#x2b; manure</td>
<td align="center">5</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;4</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;13</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;7</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;4</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">N100PK &#x2b; biochar</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;6</td>
<td align="center">12</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;2</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;7</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">N150PK&#x2b; biochar</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="center">7</td>
<td align="center">7</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">0</td>
<td align="center">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Mean</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;6</td>
<td align="center">2</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;4</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;4</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;3</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center">Residue</td>
<td align="center">Nutrient</td>
<td align="center">Moisture</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>p</italic> value</td>
<td align="center">0.003</td>
<td align="center">0.001</td>
<td align="center">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center">Residue &#xd7; nutrient</td>
<td align="center">Residue &#xd7; moisture</td>
<td align="center">Nutrient &#xd7; moisture</td>
<td align="center">Residue &#xd7; nutrient &#xd7; moisture</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">
<italic>p</italic> value</td>
<td align="center">0.001</td>
<td align="center">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="center">0.002</td>
<td align="center">0.009</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Negative sign indicates a decrease in flux from 57&#xa0;days of incubation.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Our results indicated significant interaction of residue &#xd7; nutrient and nutrient &#xd7; moisture on net nitrous oxide emission magnitude after 87&#xa0;days of the incubation period. The simple effects of nutrients were significant for control soil without residue and in soybean and wheat residue-amended treatments. Residue types significantly influenced N<sub>2</sub>O emissions in N0P0K0, N0PK, and N150PK &#x2b; biochar. Different nutrient management significantly (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.001) influenced cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes at 80% FC soil moisture for residue types, but 60% FC had no effect. For control soil without residue, N100PK &#x2b; manure and N150PK led to higher N<sub>2</sub>O emission than N0P0K0 averaged across soil moisture, but there were no differences between nutrient treatments when treated with maize and rice residues. Nutrient addition significantly (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.0001) increased the cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O emissions in control and residue-amended soils except for maize residue after 87&#xa0;days of incubation in both soil moisture contents. For example, in control soil without residue, nutrient addition increased the mean N<sub>2</sub>O emission by 5% (N0PK), 42% (N100PK), 44% (N150PK), 45% (N100PK &#x2b; manure), 12% (N100PK &#x2b; biochar), and 21% (N150PK &#x2b; biochar) compared with no nutrient (N0P0K0) across soil moisture. The results showed the effect of biochar in reducing N<sub>2</sub>O emission from the nitrogen fertilizer (N100PK and N150PK) was regulated by residue type and residue return. Integrated use of inorganic nutrients with biochar has decreased the N<sub>2</sub>O emission compared with inorganic fertilizer in soil without residue and maize and rice residue-amended soils (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1</xref>). Regardless of soil moisture, integrated use of maize residue and nutrients reduced N<sub>2</sub>O emission by 31% (N0PK), 19% (N100PK), 20% (N150PK), 19% (N100PK &#x2b; manure), 29% (N100PK &#x2b; biochar), and 22% (N150PK &#x2b; biochar) compared with no nutrient (N0P0K0). Without nutrients, cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O emission from the residue-amended soil (N0P0K0) was significantly greater than that from the control soil without residue (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). Without nutrients, in residue-amended and unamended soil, the cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O emissions during 87&#xa0;days of incubation followed the order maize&#x3e;rice&#x2248;soybean&#x3e;wheat&#x3e;control soil. However, in the plus nutrient treatments in which all the three nutrients were given (N100PK, N150PK, and N100PK &#x2b; manure), residue addition decreased the soil N<sub>2</sub>O emission compared with control without residue at 80% FC soil moisture (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure&#x20;3</xref>). Unlike 80% FC, the residue addition with nutrients at 60% FC had no consistent effect (increased or decreased) on the emission of N<sub>2</sub>O. At 87&#xa0;days of incubation at 80% FC, FC soil moisture had significantly higher (1.53 times) N<sub>2</sub>O emission than 60%&#x20;FC.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Cumulative soil nitrous oxide flux (&#xb5;g-N kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil) as influenced by residue types, nutrients, and soil moisture after 87&#xa0;days of incubation. Details of cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O flux statistics are provided in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Tables 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-857233-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Comparative change in cumulative soil nitrous oxide flux (&#xb5;g-N kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil) in residue-returned soil over residue-control soil under different residue types, nutrients, and soil moisture levels after 87&#xa0;days of incubation.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-857233-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>Soil CO<sub>2</sub> Respiration</title>
<p>CO<sub>2</sub> flux measurement was used to measure the effect of residue on soil CO<sub>2</sub> respiration. The interactive effects of time, residue, moisture, and nutrient management significantly influenced the soil CO<sub>2</sub> respiration (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Tables 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">4</xref>). The soil CO<sub>2</sub> respiration rates reached their maximum on the first and fourth day of incubation at 60% FC and 80% FC, respectively, and then decreased gradually (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figures S3, S4</xref>). The respiration rate was highly variable among residues in the first several days of incubation. Across residue types and nutrient management, the CO<sub>2</sub> emission decreased by 62% as the incubation moisture content decreased from 80% FC to 60% FC (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure&#x20;4</xref>). Residue addition triggered the mineralization of SOC to CO<sub>2</sub>, which was significantly greater at higher (80% FC) than lower moisture content (60% FC)<bold>.</bold> Across nutrient and soil moisture, CO<sub>2</sub> release was higher by 2.3 (wheat), 2.0 (rice), 1.9 (soybean), and 2.4 (maize) times in residue-returned soils compared with control soil. The order of CO<sub>2</sub> release was control &#x3c; soybean &#x2248; rice &#x3c; maize &#x2248; wheat. There was no significant difference in CO<sub>2</sub> release observed between N0P0K0 and nutrient plus treatment except for significantly (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.01) lower values of cumulative CO<sub>2</sub> release in N100PK and N150PK &#x2b; biochar. Across nutrient management, at 80% FC, the cumulative soil respiration (mg CO<sub>2</sub>-C Kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil) ranged from 53 to 117 (control soil), 174&#x2013;258 (wheat residue-amended), 115&#x2013;201 (rice residue-amended), 128&#x2013;202 (soybean residue-amended), and 150&#x2013;221 (maize residue-amended). In maize residue-returned soil under the two soil moisture contents, the cumulative CO<sub>2</sub> release decreased with increasing N levels from N0 to N150. For example, at 80% FC soil moisture, the cumulative CO<sub>2</sub> release decreased by 19% (N0PK), 28% (N100PK), 25% (N150PK), 34% (N100PK &#x2b; manure), 3% (N100PK &#x2b; biochar), and 37% (N150PK &#x2b; biochar) compared with N0P0K0 (no nutrients) in maize residue-returned treatment.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Cumulative soil CO<sub>2</sub> respiration (mg-C kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil) as influenced by residue types, nutrients, and soil moisture after 87&#xa0;days of incubation. Details of statistics of cumulative CO<sub>2</sub>-C mineralization are provided in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table&#x20;4</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-857233-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4">
<title>Soil Enzyme Activity</title>
<p>The viable microbial activity is determined by the dehydrogenase enzyme (DHA) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">Balota et&#x20;al., 2004</xref>). Hence, it can be used as an indicator of soil microbial activity. The DHA was significantly influenced by the main effects of residue types, moisture, temperature, and time (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Tables 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">6</xref>). The average DHA ranged between 15.0 and 74.8&#xa0;&#xb5;g TPF g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil at 24&#xa0;h<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (80% FC) and 14.6&#x2013;47.9&#xa0;&#xb5;g TPF g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil at 24&#xa0;h<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (60% FC) and decreased by 23% with a reduction of moisture content from 80% FC to 60% FC (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Figure S5</xref>). Averaged across nutrient treatments, addition of residue significantly (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.001) increased the DHA by 96 and 26% at 80% FC and 60% FC, respectively, as compared with control soil after 87&#xa0;days of incubation. However, there were no significant differences in DHA between the different types of residues. The DHA significantly increased with nutrient inputs in both residue and moisture levels. Averaged across residue and moisiture levels, the DHA was higher by 21% (N0PK), 50% (N100PK), 75% (N150PK), 57% (N100PK &#x2b; manure), 38% (N100PK &#x2b; biochar), and 57% (N150PK &#x2b; biochar) than that of no nutrient (N0P0K0) treatment.</p>
<table-wrap id="T6" position="float">
<label>TABLE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>ANOVA for dehydrogenase activity (DHA) and labile SOC at 57 and 87&#xa0;days of incubation.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Source of variation</th>
<th align="center">Degrees of freedom</th>
<th align="center">DHA&#x20;at 57&#xa0;days</th>
<th align="center">DHA&#x20;at 87&#xa0;days</th>
<th align="center">Labile SOC at 57&#xa0;days</th>
<th align="center">Labile SOC at 87&#xa0;days</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td colspan="4" align="center">Significance (<italic>p</italic> value)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Residue</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.003</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.121</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.866</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Nutrient</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.181</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.949</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Moisture</td>
<td align="center">1</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Residue &#xd7; nutrient</td>
<td align="center">24</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.827</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.947</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.088</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Residue &#xd7; moisture</td>
<td align="center">4</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.995</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x3c;0.001</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.309</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Nutrient &#xd7; moisture</td>
<td align="center">6</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.927</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.065</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.523</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.998</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Residue &#xd7; nutrient &#xd7; moisture</td>
<td align="center">24</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.000</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.693</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.576</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Error</td>
<td align="center">140</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Total</td>
<td align="center">210</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Corrected total</td>
<td align="center">209</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2014;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-5">
<title>Labile Soil Organic Carbon Fraction of Soil</title>
<p>Soil organic C oxidized by neutral KMnO<sub>4</sub> was used to quantify the labile carbon fraction of soil. Labile SOC was significantly higher at 87 than 57&#xa0;&#xa0;days of incubation, supported by the significant interactive effect of time &#xd7; residue &#xd7; nutrient &#xd7; moisture (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3d; 0.002) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table&#x20;3</xref>). However, at 57 and 87&#xa0;days of incubation, only moisture had a significant effect (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.001) on labile SOC (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">Table&#x20;6</xref>). Without nutrients (N0P0K0), residue application decreased the labile SOC compared with control soil, at 60% FC (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure&#x20;5</xref>). However, integrated use of residue and nutrients relatively increased the labile SOC compared with control soil though not significant. Averaged across residue and nutrient treatments at 87&#xa0;days of incubation, the labile SOC was higher by 10% due to nutrient addition than that of no nutrient treatment at 60% FC. In contrast, at 80% FC, wheat residue treatment increased the labile SOC compared with control soil, while rice, soybean, and maize residue decreased the labile fraction across nutrient management. At the end of the incubation period (87&#xa0;days) and averaged across all treatments, labile SOC was lower by 13% at 60% FC than 80% FC. In the control soil without residue, the biochar plus nutrients (N100PK and N150PK) treatments decreased labile SOC compared to other nutrient management treatments without biochar. However, in soil with residue, biochar plus nutrients (N100PK and N150PK) increased the labile SOC by 14% compared with control soil at 60% FC moisture only. In contrast, the effect of biochar was negative or had no impact on labile SOC at the higher moisture content (80% FC) in all residue treatments. Over 87&#xa0;days, the average labile SOC fraction ranged from 583 to 659&#xa0;mg&#xa0;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> across treatments at 80% FC and 470&#x2013;580&#xa0;mg&#xa0;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil at 60%&#x20;FC.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Labile soil organic carbon (mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) as influenced by residue types, nutrients, and soil moisture after 57 and 87&#xa0;days of incubation. Details of labile soil organic carbon statistics are provided in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Tables 3</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">6</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-857233-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-6">
<title>Relationship Between Soil N<sub>2</sub>O Emission and Related Soil and Crop Properties</title>
<p>The cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O emission was significantly (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.01) and positively correlated with soil as well as crop residue characteristics. Among the soil properties, significant (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.01) and positive correlations were observed with NO<sub>3</sub>-N, NO<sub>2</sub>-N, NH<sub>4</sub>-N, DHA, labile SOC, soil CO<sub>2</sub> emission, and soil moisture content. Among the crop residue characteristics, residue total nitrogen (TN) was positively correlated and C:N ratio of crop residue was negatively correlated with the N<sub>2</sub>O flux (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T7">Table&#x20;7</xref>). The quantification of the individual effects of the selected soil and crop residue characteristics on N<sub>2</sub>O emissions was carried out by stepwise multiple regression analysis. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e1">Eq. 1</xref> was used to describe N<sub>2</sub>O emission as a function of studied soil and crop properties. The constant and each coefficient of variables, the <italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> (0.82) and adjusted <italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> (0.81), were significant at <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.0001 in <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e1">Eq. 1</xref>.<disp-formula id="e1">
<mml:math id="m1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x3bc;gN</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>kg</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mtext>soil</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3d;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.126</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>mg</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>kg</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.06</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>labile</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>SOC</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>mg</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>kg</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.12</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>CO</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>mg</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Ckg</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>soil</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>23.23</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>residue</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>TN</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>25.84.</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
<label>equation&#x20;(1)</label>
</disp-formula>
</p>
<table-wrap id="T7" position="float">
<label>TABLE 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Pearson&#x2019;s correlation coefficient between soil N<sub>2</sub>O emission and related soil and crop properties.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left"/>
<th align="center">Nitrate</th>
<th align="center">Nitrite</th>
<th align="center">Ammonia</th>
<th align="center">DHA</th>
<th align="center">Labile SOC</th>
<th align="center">CO<sub>2</sub>
</th>
<th align="center">N<sub>2</sub>O</th>
<th align="center">C:N</th>
<th align="center">Moisture</th>
<th align="center">Lignin:TN</th>
<th align="center">Residue TC</th>
<th align="center">Residue TN</th>
<th align="center">Cellulose:TC</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Nitrate</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.000</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.511<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.270<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.642<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.276<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.199<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.463<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.038</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.158<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn2">
<sup>b</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.029</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.276<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.076</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.079</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Nitrite</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.511<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.000</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.269<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.599<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.368<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.437<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.442<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.110</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.369<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.028</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.182<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn2">
<sup>b</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.106</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.171<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn2">
<sup>b</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Ammonia</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.270<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.269<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.000</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.370<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.722<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.739<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.719<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.072</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.373<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.054</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.022</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.075</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.072</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">DHA</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.642<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.599<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.370<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.000</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.380<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.410<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.465<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.083</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.270<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.098</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.043</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.088</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.039</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Labile SOC</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.276<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.368<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.722<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.380<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.000</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.687<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.744<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.052</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.336<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.045</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.010</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.056</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.046</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CO<sub>2</sub>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.199<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.437<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.739<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.410<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.687<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.000</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.788<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.105</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.488<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.054</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.049</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.125</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.156<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn2">
<sup>b</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">N<sub>2</sub>O</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.463<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.442<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.719<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.465<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.744<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.788<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.000</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.155<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn2">
<sup>b</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.314<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.141</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.018</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.160<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn2">
<sup>b</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.122</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">C:N</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.038</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.110</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.072</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.083</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.052</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.105</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.155<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn2">
<sup>b</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.000</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.472<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.903<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.455<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.989<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.747<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Moisture</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.158<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn2">
<sup>b</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.369<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.373<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.270<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.336<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.488<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.314<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.472<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.000</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.517<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.450<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.419<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.182<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn2">
<sup>b</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Lignin:TN</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.029</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.028</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.054</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.098</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.045</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.054</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.141</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.903<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.517<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.000</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.425<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.856<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.396<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Residue TC</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.276<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.182<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn2">
<sup>b</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.022</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.043</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.010</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.049</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.018</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.455<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.450<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.425<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.000</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.346<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.202<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Residue TN</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.076</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.106</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.075</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.088</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.056</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.125</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.160<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn2">
<sup>b</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.989<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.419<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.856<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.346<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.000</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.813<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cellulose:TC</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.079</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.171<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn2">
<sup>b</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.072</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.039</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.046</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.156<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn2">
<sup>b</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.122</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.747<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.182<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn2">
<sup>b</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.396<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">0.202<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">&#x2212;0.813<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</td>
<td align="char" char=".">1.000</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="Tfn1">
<label>a</label>
<p>Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).</p>
</fn>
<fn id="Tfn2">
<label>b</label>
<p>Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The regression analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM) results showed that out of all the variables, only residue TN, soil CO<sub>2</sub> emission, NO<sub>3</sub>-N, and labile SOC were the highly influencing factors and could explain 82% variability in the soil N<sub>2</sub>O emission in the Vertisols (overall model <italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> &#x3d; 0.82; <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.001&#x20;<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure&#x20;6</xref> and <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e1">Eq.&#x20;1</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F6" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Structural equation model (SEM) of soil N<sub>2</sub>O emission based on residue and soil properties. The numbers next to lines represent <bold>(A)</bold> unstandardized path coefficients and <bold>(B)</bold> standardized path coefficients. <italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> values above each rectangular box in <bold>(B)</bold> represent the proportion of the variance explaining endogenous variables. The standardized regression weights represent the amount of change in the dependent variable that is attributable to a single standard deviation unit&#x2019;s worth of change in the predictor variable. The unstandardized path coefficients <bold>(A)</bold> represent the amount of change in the dependent variable given a single raw score unit change in the predictor variable. Goodness-of-fit statistics are shown underneath the modeling&#x20;frame.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fenvs-10-857233-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4-1">
<title>Soil Nitrogen Mineralization</title>
<p>Returning crop residues and other organic inputs to the soil effectively sustain the soil mineral N (NH<sub>4</sub>, NO<sub>3</sub>, and NO<sub>2</sub>) and crop productivity. The concentration of mineral N is dependent on the microbial transformation of organic inputs such as decomposition and mineralization. The responses of microbial transformations to crop residue inputs are regulated by soil moisture, temperature, and the quality of crop residue (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Raiesi, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Muhammad et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Lehtinen et&#x20;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Datta et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>). In this experiment, the extent of N mineralization and immobilization was significantly affected by soil moisture and residue biochemical quality, as the investigation was conducted under same temperature (30&#x20;&#xb1; 1&#xb0;C). The NO<sub>3</sub>-N pool decreased significantly (<italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.05) in all residue-amended soils (<italic>cf.</italic> control soil), probably due to immobilization of available N by microbes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kaleeem Abbasi et&#x20;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Datta et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>) because of higher C:N ratio of residues (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table&#x20;1</xref>). The N immobilization in wheat, rice, and maize residue-amended soil samples was substantially greater than that observed in soybean-amended soils because former residues had a comparatively higher C:N ratio. This study demonstrated that the mineral N input (N100PK, N150PK, and integrated use of nutrients) could meet the assimilation needs of the microbes and decrease the immobilization of mineral N, as evident from higher soil NO<sub>3</sub>-N in these treatments. Organic materials with a C:N ratio less than 30 are expected to result in net N mineralization, while those with C:N ratios higher than 30 cause immobilization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Muhammad et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>). Because all the crop residues added in the current experiment had C:N ratio &#x3e;30:1, their addition might have resulted in net N immobilization. Furthermore, crop residue additions could have induced soil and microbial nutrient stoichiometry changes (C:N; N:P, and C:P) needed for SOC and residue C mineralization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Shen et&#x20;al., 2021</xref>). Nutrient inputs might have improved the availability of nutrients to the microbial community, thereby changing the microbial nutrient stoichiometry and microbial community as the residues are decomposed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Kirkby et&#x20;al., 2013</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Fang et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Shen et&#x20;al., 2021</xref>). In crop residue-amended treatments, microbial N limitation was primarily affected by the supply&#x2013;demand relationships between microorganisms and resources. Alternatively, integrated inorganic nutrients (N100PK) with manure characterized with a lower C:N ratio of 8:1, and crop residue return could increase the mineral N content indicating net N mineralization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Baggs et&#x20;al., 2000</xref>).</p>
<p>However, the addition of biochar (C:N:: 45:1) with N100PK and N150PK had a mixed effect (positive and negative) on soil NO<sub>3</sub> concentration, probably, because the soil NO<sub>3</sub> concentration is dependent on three predominant microbial processes, <italic>viz</italic>., nitrification, denitrification, and dissimilatory nitrate reduction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Baggs et&#x20;al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Toma and Hatano, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Wang and Luo, 2018</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Oladele et&#x20;al. (2019)</xref>, in a field study, reported that the NH<sub>4</sub>-N and NO<sub>3</sub>-N content increased with increasing doses of rice husk biochar and N fertilizer at the 0&#x2013;10&#xa0;cm soil layer, and the concentration decreased at the 10&#x2013;20&#xa0;cm soil layer under rainfed rice crop. The inconsistent effect of biochar on soil mineral N could probably be attributed to variance in soil moisture, residue quality, and N rates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Kanthle et&#x20;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Oladele et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Liao et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>). Soybean and maize residues maintained a significantly higher NO<sub>3</sub>-N across all nutrient management under 80% FC except only soybean residue at 60% FC probably because of high lignin and less cellulose content compared to other crop residues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Raiesi, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Chen et&#x20;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Liang et&#x20;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hu et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Jin et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>). This study revealed a negative relationship (not significant) between C:N of crop residue and NO<sub>3</sub>-N and NH<sub>4</sub>-N (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T7">Table&#x20;7</xref>), and similar responses of net N mineralization (immobilization) to C:N of crop residues were observed in previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Baggs et&#x20;al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Toma and Hatano, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Wang et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Lehtinen et&#x20;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Wang and Luo, 2018</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4-2">
<title>Nitrous Oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) Fluxes</title>
<p>Our study showed that nutrient management and soil moisture content could change the magnitude and direction of N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes in residue-returned soils. The cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes were comparable between 80% FC and 60% FC soil moisture, despite the two levels of soil moisture contents responding differently to the treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). At 80% FC, the N<sub>2</sub>O emissions increased with increasing levels of N input (N0PK, N100PK, and N150PK) in control and residue-amended soils (except maize). In contrast, at 60% FC, increasing N levels had no consistent effects on cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes in control and residue-amended soil. It is generally recognized that increasing N levels can exacerbate N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes by favoring microbial growth, oxygen consumption, and denitrification through elevated labile SOC and mineral N concentrations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Ullah et&#x20;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Fang et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">Yujin Zhang et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>). However, reducing the soil moisture from 80 to 60% FC decreased the soil microbial activity, as evident from significantly lower CO<sub>2</sub> release (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure&#x20;4</xref>), limiting denitrification and the associated N<sub>2</sub>O release (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Dick et&#x20;al., 2008</xref>). Previous studies have reported that denitrification is the more predominant process in N<sub>2</sub>O emission than nitrification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Klemedtsson et&#x20;al., 1988</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Ciarlo et&#x20;al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Troy and Tang, 2011</xref>). A nonlinear relationship between increasing N levels and N<sub>2</sub>O production is consistent with previous works, which reported that inhibition of N<sub>2</sub>O reductase activity occurs at very high N concentrations because of the competitive effect of NO<sub>3</sub>-N and N<sub>2</sub>O as electron acceptors during denitrification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Garc&#xed;a-Marco et&#x20;al., 2014</xref>). Increased fluxes of nitrous oxide, as well as increased CO<sub>2</sub> emission, mineral N, labile SOC, and soil enzyme activity, were found in response to treatments with higher nutrients, moisture levels, and residue return (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Letey et&#x20;al., 1981</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Klemedtsson et&#x20;al., 1988</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Ciarlo et&#x20;al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Mutegi et&#x20;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chen et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Hongjin Zhang et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Wu et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">Yujin Zhang et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>). The correlation analysis in the study also found a significant positive relation between N<sub>2</sub>O emission and all the studied soil properties and residue total nitrogen and a significantly negative correlation with the C:N ratio of crop residue. Further integrated use of nutrients (N100PK &#x2b; manure, N100PK &#x2b; biochar, and N150PK &#x2b; biochar) in control and residue-amended soil considerably reduced N<sub>2</sub>O emission from fertilizer N at 80% FC than 60% FC which is consistent with previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hu et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Wu et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>). That indicates biochar/manure with nutrients (N100PK or N150PK) might have influenced the N cycling enzymes, mineral N, and substrate availability and might have stimulated the reduction of nitrous oxide to dinitrogen (N<sub>2</sub>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Troy and Tang, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Sangeeta Lenka et&#x20;al., 2017</xref>). Integrated use of nutrients (N100PK &#x2b; manure) relatively increased the soil enzyme activity in all residue-amended soils compared with control soil. Similar positive effects of NPK addition with crop residue and manure on soil DHA are reported by previous researchers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Liang et&#x20;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">&#x160;imon and Czak&#xf3;, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Narendra K. Lenka et&#x20;al., 2017</xref>). The application of biochar with NPK and crop residue has increased the dehydrogenase activity by 70 and 40% under 80 and 60% FC, respectively, compared with control, which could be attributed to enhanced soil CO<sub>2</sub> respiration from biochar addition. This could be attributed to the induction of metabolically available labile-C compounds associated with the biochar that alters the CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes and SOC mineralization by targeting the recalcitrant C of soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Anderson et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>).</p>
<p>An interesting result was obtained for maize residue, which had a high C:N ratio (65:1) in reducing N<sub>2</sub>O emission from fertilizer N by 1&#x2013;17% in all nutrient management treatments at 60% FC soil moisture compared with 80% FC. This was supported by the significantly highest N<sub>2</sub>O consumption by maize residue (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Table&#x20;5</xref>), in which NO<sub>3</sub>-N availability was reduced because of immobilization (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure&#x20;1</xref>). Furthermore, control soil (without residue) and residue amended (wheat and rice) with the N fertilizer (N100PK and N150PK) has significantly reduced the emission of N<sub>2</sub>O from fertilizer N at 60% FC relative to 80% FC supported by relatively lower cumulative CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and NO<sub>3</sub>-N from these treatments. In their review, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hu et&#x20;al. (2019)</xref> have shown significantly lower N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes observed at the N application rate of 100&#x2013;150&#xa0;kg&#xa0;ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> regarding residue returning. Compared with control soil, the cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O emission after 57&#xa0;days of incubation was considerably higher in residue with inorganic nutrients (N100PK and N150PK) than integrated use of nutrients (N100PK &#x2b; manure, N100PK &#x2b; biochar, and N150PK &#x2b; biochar). Among the different crop residue-amended soil treatments, the daily and cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O emission was the lowest in wheat and maize residue-amended soils and highest in soybean and rice residue-amended soils after 57&#xa0;days of incubation. The average N<sub>2</sub>O emission from wheat residue-amended soil was even lower than that from control soil. Our results are in agreement with previous studies reporting comparatively large N<sub>2</sub>O emissions after application of readily degradable crop residues with a low C:N ratio and application of manure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Toma and Hatano, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Muhammad et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Lehtinen et&#x20;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Wang and Luo, 2018</xref>). This is probably a reflection of the rapid stimulation of microbial mineralization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Lenka et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>), the possible creation of anaerobic microsites resulting from microbial respiration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Muhammad et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Shan and Yan, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Lehtinen et&#x20;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Wu et&#x20;al., 2020</xref>), and the increased C supply and substrate for nitrification and denitrification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Khalil et&#x20;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Lehtinen et&#x20;al., 2014</xref>). Furthermore, previous studies also reported that the addition of high C:N ratio residues leads to high rates of microbial N immobilization in soil, limiting N for nitrifiers and denitrifiers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Muhammad et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Thomson et&#x20;al., 2012</xref>). Our study could further identify the key factors from the regression analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM) results, which showed that residue TN, soil CO<sub>2</sub> emission, NO<sub>3</sub>-N, and labile SOC were the highly influencing factors and could explain 82% variability in the soil N<sub>2</sub>O emission in the Vertisols (overall model <italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> &#x3d; 0.82; <italic>p</italic>&#x20;&#x3c; 0.001&#x20;<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure&#x20;6</xref> and <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="e1">Eq.&#x20;1</xref>).</p>
<p>The negative fluxes of N<sub>2</sub>O observed after 57&#xa0;days of incubation indicate N<sub>2</sub>O consumption in all treatments. The N<sub>2</sub>O consumption observed in the study could be attributed to less substrate availability for the denitrifiers, and in such conditions, N<sub>2</sub>O serves as electron acceptors for heterotrophic denitrifiers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Cavigelli and Robertson, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chapuis-lardy et&#x20;al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Garc&#xed;a-Marco et&#x20;al., 2014</xref>). The significantly higher N<sub>2</sub>O consumption of control soil without residue and nutrients at 60% FC moisture than that of other treatments supports the assertion that N<sub>2</sub>O consumption could be increased at low mineral levels and soil moisture and without residue return (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chapuis-lardy et&#x20;al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Pauleta et&#x20;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Garc&#xed;a-Marco et&#x20;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">Yoon et&#x20;al., 2019</xref>). This study further reveals that applying crop residues with integrated organic and inorganic nutrients (N100PK &#x2b; manure, N100PK &#x2b; biochar, and N150PK &#x2b; biochar) reduced the N<sub>2</sub>O consumption (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">Table&#x20;6</xref>). The influence of nutrient management and crop residue return was evident at the drier soil moisture content (60% FC) than 80% FC. This result strongly indicates the effect of low mineral N, labile SOC, and enzyme activity in regulating N<sub>2</sub>O consumption because of drier soil moisture at 60% FC. Although there was no significant difference between residue types on N<sub>2</sub>O consumption, however, the cereal residues with a high C:N ratio (maize&#x3e; wheat&#x3e; rice) relatively had higher N<sub>2</sub>O consumption than soybean, a legume residue. Furthermore, previous studies also reported that the addition of high C:N ratio residues leads to high rates of microbial N immobilization in soil, and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions have been reported to be lowered (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Muhammad et&#x20;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Thomson et&#x20;al., 2012</xref>). Our results highlight the need to examine residue type, nutrient management, and soil moisture in Vertisols which are essential drivers of the GHG N<sub>2</sub>O emission and global C and N&#x20;cycle.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusion" id="s5">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Our study gives new insights into the sustainable management of different crop residues, nutrients, and soil moisture for reducing soil N<sub>2</sub>O emission by studying the underlying mechanisms of soil microbial processes (soil respiration and extracellular enzyme activity), soil properties (mineral N and labile SOC), and residue quality (TN, C:N, lignin:TN, and cellulose:TC). The study showed that soybean residue return with nutrient addition increased the N<sub>2</sub>O emission at each soil moisture level. In contrast, N<sub>2</sub>O consumption was higher in maize and wheat residue-amended soils. The best treatment for mitigation of N<sub>2</sub>O emission was N100PK and N150PK at 80% field capacity in wheat residue-amended soil, under which approximately 20% lower net emission was observed (<italic>cf</italic>. control soil without residue). In terms of the absolute value, N<sub>2</sub>O consumption was significantly higher at 60% FC than 80% FC, and the reverse was true for N<sub>2</sub>O emission. Our results demonstrated that nutrient addition (P and K) is essential to reduce the emissions of N<sub>2</sub>O from fertilizer N application in residue-amended soils. Residue addition under N0P0K0 and N0PK treatments increased the N<sub>2</sub>O emissions compared with control soil under both moisture content levels. The comparative reduction in the residue-returned soil as compared to residue-control soil was higher at 80% FC and in the nutrient addition treatments over the corresponding treatments at 60% FC. The regression analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM) results showed that residue TN, soil CO<sub>2</sub> emission, NO<sub>3</sub>-N, and labile SOC were the highly influencing factors and could explain 82% variability in the soil N<sub>2</sub>O emission in the Vertisols of Central India. The results from incubation studies might not exactly match the results from field studies because of field variability, but they provide strong indication about the likely impact of the input variables. Thus, the underlying mechanisms regulating N<sub>2</sub>O emission under different levels of nutrient, soil moisture, and crop residue addition needs further investigation and validation in field experiments. Moreover, the resulting information can be integrated into a mechanistic model for predicting the magnitude of N<sub>2</sub>O emission and soil N storage through integrated residue and nutrient management practices in the selected agroecosystem.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s6">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s11">Supplementary Material</xref>, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>SL: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, software, supervision, visualization, writing&#x2013;original draft, and writing&#x2013;review and editing. RC: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, software, supervision, visualization, and writing&#x2013;original draft. NL: formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, software, supervision, validation, visualization, and writing&#x2013;review and editing. JS: investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, supervision, validation, visualization, and writing&#x2013;review and editing. DA: data curation, formal analysis, methodology, software, supervision, validation, visualization, and writing&#x2013;original draft. AP: conceptualization, project administration, resources, supervision, validation, visualization, and writing&#x2013;review and editing. VG: formal analysis, investigation, methodology, software, supervision, and validation. DS: formal analysis, investigation, methodology, software, and validation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The senior author acknowledges the research grant provided by the National Agricultural Science Fund of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi (Grant No. NASF/CA-7019/2018-19), and Science and Engineering Research Board, POWER Fellowship (Grant No. SPF/2020/000022).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s9">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s10">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<p>We also thank reviewers and the editor for their valuable and constructive comments.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s11">
<title>Supplementary Material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.857233/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.857233/full&#x23;supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/docx" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Al-Kaisi</surname>
<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Tillage and Crop Residue Effects on Soil Carbon and Carbon Dioxide Emission in Corn-Soybean Rotations</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Environ. Qual.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>437</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>445</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/jeq2005.0437</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Anderson</surname>
<given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Condron</surname>
<given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Clough</surname>
<given-names>T. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fiers</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stewart</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hill</surname>
<given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Biochar Induced Soil Microbial Community Change: Implications for Biogeochemical Cycling of Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus</article-title>. <source>Pedobiologia</source> <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>309</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>320</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pedobi.2011.07.005</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Baggs</surname>
<given-names>E. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rees</surname>
<given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname>
<given-names>K. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vinten</surname>
<given-names>A. J.&#x20;A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Soils after Incorporating Crop Residues</article-title>. <source>Soil Use Manag.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>82</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>87</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/9781118676332.ch8</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B91">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Balota</surname>
<given-names>E. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kanashiro</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Colozzi</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Andrade</surname>
<given-names>D. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dick</surname>
<given-names>R. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Soil Enzyme Activities Under Long-term Tillage and Crop Rotation Systems in Subtropical Agro-eco Systems</article-title>. <source>Braz. J. Microbiol.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>300</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>306</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Blair</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lefroy</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lisle</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Soil Carbon Fractions Based on Their Degree of Oxidation, and the Development of a Carbon Management index for Agricultural Systems</article-title>. <source>Aust. J.&#x20;Agric. Res.</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>1459</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1466</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/AR9951459</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cavigelli</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Robertson</surname>
<given-names>G. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Role of Denitrifier Diversity in Rates of Nitrous Oxide Consumption in a Terrestrial Ecosystem</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>297</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>310</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00141-3</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chapuis-lardy</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wrage</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Metay</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chotte</surname>
<given-names>J.-L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bernoux</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Soils, a Sink for N2O? A Review</article-title>. <source>Glob. Change Biol.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01280.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Charles</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rochette</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Whalen</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Angers</surname>
<given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chantigny</surname>
<given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bertrand</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Global Nitrous Oxide Emission Factors from Agricultural Soils after Addition of Organic Amendments: A Meta-Analysis</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>236</volume>, <fpage>88</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>98</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2016.11.021</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Soil Nitrous Oxide Emissions Following Crop Residue Addition: A Meta-Analysis</article-title>. <source>Glob. Change Biol.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>2956</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2964</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.12274</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liebman</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cavigelli</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wander</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Influence of Residue and Nitrogen Fertilizer Additions on Carbon Mineralization in Soils with Different Texture and Cropping Histories</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>e103720</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0103720</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Removal of Nutrients and Emission of Nitrous Oxide during Simultaneous Nitrification, Denitrification and Phosphorus Removal Process with Metal Ions Addition</article-title>. <source>Int. Biodeterior. Biodegr.</source> <volume>142</volume>, <fpage>143</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>150</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ibiod.2019.05.016</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meng</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Elrys</surname>
<given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Microbial Process-Oriented Understanding of Stimulation of Soil N2O Emission Following the Input of Organic Materials</article-title>. <source>Environ. Pollut.</source> <volume>284</volume>, <fpage>117176</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117176</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ciarlo</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Conti</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bartoloni</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rubio</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>The Effect of Moisture on Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Soil and the N2O/(N2O&#x2b;N2) Ratio under Laboratory Conditions</article-title>. <source>Biol. Fertil. Soils</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>675</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>681</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00374-006-0147-9</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Datta</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jat</surname>
<given-names>H. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yadav</surname>
<given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Choudhary</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname>
<given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rai</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Carbon Mineralization in Soil as Influenced by Crop Residue Type and Placement in an Alfisols of Northwest India</article-title>. <source>Carbon Manage.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>37</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>50</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/17583004.2018.1544830</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dick</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaya</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Soutoura</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Skiba</surname>
<given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Niang</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>The Contribution of Agricultural Practices to Nitrous Oxide Emissions in Semi-arid Mali</article-title>. <source>Soil Use Manag.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>292</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>301</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1475-2743.2008.00163.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nazaries</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>B. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>B. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018a</year>). <article-title>Microbial Mechanisms of Carbon Priming Effects Revealed during the Interaction of Crop Residue and Nutrient Inputs in Contrasting Soils</article-title>. <source>Glob. Change Biol.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>2775</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2790</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.14154</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>B. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Collins</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tavakkoli</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018b</year>). <article-title>Nutrient Supply Enhanced Wheat Residue-Carbon Mineralization, Microbial Growth, and Microbial Carbon-Use Efficiency when Residues Were Supplied at High Rate in Contrasting Soils</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>126</volume>, <fpage>168</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>178</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.09.003</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>B. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Collins</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Armstrong</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van Zwieten</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tavakkoli</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Nutrient Stoichiometry and Labile Carbon Content of Organic Amendments Control Microbial Biomass and Carbon-Use Efficiency in a Poorly Structured Sodic-Subsoil</article-title>. <source>Biol. Fertil. Soils</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>219</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>233</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00374-019-01413-3</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>H&#xfc;tsch</surname>
<given-names>B. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schubert</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Nitrous Oxide Emission as Affected by Liming an Acidic mineral Soil Used for Arable Agriculture</article-title>. <source>Nutrient Cycl. Agroecosyst.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>283</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>292</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/B:FRES.0000003664.51048.0e</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Finn</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Page</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Catton</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kienzle</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Robertson</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Armstrong</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Ecological Stoichiometry Controls the Transformation and Retention of Plant-Derived Organic Matter to Humus in Response to Nitrogen Fertilisation</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>99</volume>, <fpage>117</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>127</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.05.006</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Nitrous Oxide Emission and Denitrifier Abundance in Two Agricultural Soils Amended with Crop Residues and Urea in the North China Plain</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>e0154773</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0154773</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Garc&#xed;a-Marco</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ravella</surname>
<given-names>S. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chadwick</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vallejo</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gregory</surname>
<given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>C&#xe1;rdenas</surname>
<given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Ranking Factors Affecting Emissions of GHG from Incubated Agricultural Soils</article-title>. <source>Eur. J.&#x20;Soil Sci.</source> <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>573</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>583</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ejss.12143</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Giles</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morley</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baggs</surname>
<given-names>E. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Daniell</surname>
<given-names>T. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Soil Nitrate Reducing Processes - Drivers, Mechanisms for Spatial Variation, and Significance for Nitrous Oxide Production</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbio.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2012.00407</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeng</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Depth Dependence of Temperature Sensitivity of Soil Carbon Dioxide, Nitrous Oxide and Methane Emissions</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>149</volume>, <fpage>107956</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107956</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Soil Respiration and N2O Flux Response to UV-B Radiation and Straw Incorporation in a Soybean-winter Wheat Rotation System</article-title>. <source>Water Air Soil Pollut.</source> <volume>224</volume>, <comment>1394</comment>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11270-012-1394-z</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The Responses of Soil N2O Emissions to Residue Returning Systems: A Meta-Analysis</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>748</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su11030748</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Islam</surname>
<given-names>K. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stine</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gruver</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Samson-Liebig</surname>
<given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weil</surname>
<given-names>R. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Estimating Active Carbon for Soil Quality Assessment: A Simplified Method for Laboratory and Field Use</article-title>. <source>Am. J.&#x20;Altern. Agric.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>3</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1079/AJAA2003003</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jackson</surname>
<given-names>R. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weber</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morris</surname>
<given-names>H. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1975</year>). <article-title>IMP Dehydrogenase, an Enzyme Linked with Proliferation and Malignancy</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>256</volume>, <fpage>331</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>333</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/256331a0</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jianwen</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lianggang</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xunhua</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuesi</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Carbon Dioxide, Methane, and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from a rice-wheat Rotation as Affected by Crop Residue Incorporation and Temperature</article-title>. <source>Adv. Atmos. Sci.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>691</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>698</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/bf02916366</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shah</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nie</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effect of Straw Returning on Soil Organic Carbon in rice-wheat Rotation System: A Review</article-title>. <source>Food Energy Secur.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/fes3.200</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kaleeem Abbasi</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mahmood Tahir</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sabir</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khurshid</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Impact of the Addition of Different Plant Residues on Nitrogen Mineralization-Immobilization Turnover and Carbon Content of a Soil Incubated under Laboratory Conditions</article-title>. <source>Solid Earth</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>197</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>205</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/se-6-197-2015</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kanthle</surname>
<given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lenka</surname>
<given-names>N. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lenka</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tedia</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Biochar Impact on Nitrate Leaching as Influenced by Native Soil Organic Carbon in an Inceptisol of central India</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>157</volume>, <fpage>65</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>72</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2015.11.009</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kempers</surname>
<given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1974</year>). <article-title>Determination of Sub-microquantities of Ammonium and Nitrates in Soils with Phenol, Sodiumnitroprusside and Hypochlorite</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>201</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>206</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0016-7061(74)90068-8</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Khalil</surname>
<given-names>M. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hossain</surname>
<given-names>M. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schmidhalter</surname>
<given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Carbon and Nitrogen Mineralization in Different upland Soils of the Subtropics Treated with Organic Materials</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>1507</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1518</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.01.014</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kirkby</surname>
<given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Richardson</surname>
<given-names>A. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wade</surname>
<given-names>L. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Batten</surname>
<given-names>G. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blanchard</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kirkegaard</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Carbon-nutrient Stoichiometry to Increase Soil Carbon Sequestration</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>60</volume>, <fpage>77</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>86</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.01.011</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kirkby</surname>
<given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Richardson</surname>
<given-names>A. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wade</surname>
<given-names>L. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Conyers</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kirkegaard</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Inorganic Nutrients Increase Humification Efficiency and C-Sequestration in an Annually Cropped Soil</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>e0153698</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0153698</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Klein</surname>
<given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Loh</surname>
<given-names>T. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goulding</surname>
<given-names>R. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1971</year>). <article-title>A Rapid Procedure to Evaluate the Dehydrogenase Activity of Soils Low in Organic Matter</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>385</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>387</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0038-0717(71)90049-6</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Klemedtsson</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Svensson</surname>
<given-names>B. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rosswall</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Relationships between Soil Moisture Content and Nitrous Oxide Production during Nitrification and Denitrification</article-title>. <source>Biol. Fert Soils</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>106</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>111</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00257658</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kundu</surname>
<given-names>D. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ghorai</surname>
<given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mitra</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>S. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Carbon and Nitrogen Mineralization Kinetics as Influenced by Diversified Cropping Systems and Residue Incorporation in Inceptisols of Eastern Indo-Gangetic Plain</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>178</volume>, <fpage>108</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>117</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2017.12.025</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lan</surname>
<given-names>Z. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rashti</surname>
<given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>D. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Stoichiometric Ratio of Dissolved Organic Carbon to Nitrate Regulates Nitrous Oxide Emission from the Biochar-Amended Soils</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>576</volume>, <fpage>559</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>571</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.119</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lehtinen</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schlatter</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baumgarten</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bechini</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kr&#xfc;ger</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grignani</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Effect of Crop Residue Incorporation on Soil Organic Carbon and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in European Agricultural Soils</article-title>. <source>Soil Use Manage</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>524</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>538</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/sum.12151</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lenka</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trivedi</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>B. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pendall</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bass</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effect of Crop Residue Addition on Soil Organic Carbon Priming as Influenced by Temperature and Soil Properties</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source> <volume>347</volume>, <fpage>70</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>79</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.03.039</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lenka</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lenka</surname>
<given-names>N. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pathak</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020a</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Reducing Emission of Greenhouse Gases from Fertilizer Use in India</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Soil and Fertilizers</source>. Editor <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Lal</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-name>Taylor &#x26; Francis, CRC Press.</publisher-name>), <fpage>357</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1201/9780429471049-7</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lenka</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Malviya</surname>
<given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Malviya</surname>
<given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lenka</surname>
<given-names>N. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sahoo</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhattacharjya</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020b</year>). <article-title>Manure Addition Influences the Effect of Tillage on Soil Aggregation and Aggregate Associated Carbon in a Vertisol of Central India</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Biol.</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>1585</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1593</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22438/jeb/41/6/SI-221</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Letey</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Valoras</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Focht</surname>
<given-names>D. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ryden</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1981</year>). <article-title>Nitrous Oxide Production and Reduction during Denitrification as Affected by Redox Potential</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>727</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>730</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj1981.03615995004500040010x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>L.-J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname>
<given-names>X.-Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>You</surname>
<given-names>M.-Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname>
<given-names>Y.-R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ding</surname>
<given-names>X.-L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qiao</surname>
<given-names>Y.-F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Carbon and Nitrogen Mineralization Patterns of Two Contrasting Crop Residues in a Mollisol: Effects of Residue Type and Placement in Soils</article-title>. <source>Eur. J.&#x20;Soil Biol.</source> <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejsobi.2012.11.002</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>X. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lv</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuzyakov</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>F.-m.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen Fertilization Decreases the Decomposition of Soil Organic Matter and Plant Residues in Planted Soils</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>112</volume>, <fpage>47</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>55</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.04.018</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reichel</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Br&#xfc;ggemann</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effect of C:N:P Stoichiometry on Soil Nitrous Oxide Emission and Nitrogen Retention</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Plant Nutr. Soil Sci.</source> <volume>184</volume>, <fpage>520</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>529</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jpln.202000416</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gong</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lal</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Effects of 15&#x20;Years of Manure and Inorganic Fertilizers on Soil Organic Carbon Fractions in a Wheat-maize System in the North China Plain</article-title>. <source>Nutr. Cycl Agroecosyst.</source> <volume>92</volume>, <fpage>21</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10705-011-9469-6</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meng</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Responses of Soil Organic Carbon Decomposition and Microbial Community to the Addition of Plant Residues with Different C:N Ratio</article-title>. <source>Eur. J.&#x20;Soil Biol.</source> <volume>82</volume>, <fpage>50</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>55</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejsobi.2017.08.005</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liao</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effects of Biochar-Based Controlled Release Nitrogen Fertilizer on Nitrogen-Use Efficiency of Oilseed Rape (Brassica Napus L.)</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-020-67528-y</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liyanage</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grace</surname>
<given-names>P. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scheer</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Rosa</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ranwala</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rowlings</surname>
<given-names>D. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Carbon Limits Non-linear Response of Nitrous Oxide (N2O) to Increasing N Inputs in a Highly-Weathered Tropical Soil in Sri Lanka</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>292</volume>, <fpage>106808</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2019.106808</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mehnaz</surname>
<given-names>K. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Corneo</surname>
<given-names>P. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Keitel</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dijkstra</surname>
<given-names>F. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Carbon and Phosphorus Addition Effects on Microbial Carbon Use Efficiency, Soil Organic Matter Priming, Gross Nitrogen Mineralization and Nitrous Oxide Emission from Soil</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>134</volume>, <fpage>175</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>186</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.04.003</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Muhammad</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vaughan</surname>
<given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dalal</surname>
<given-names>R. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Menzies</surname>
<given-names>N. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Crop Residues and Fertilizer Nitrogen Influence Residue Decomposition and Nitrous Oxide Emission from a Vertisol</article-title>. <source>Biol. Fertil. Soils</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>15</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>23</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00374-010-0497-1</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mutegi</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Munkholm</surname>
<given-names>L. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Petersen</surname>
<given-names>B. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hansen</surname>
<given-names>E. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Petersen</surname>
<given-names>S. O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Nitrous Oxide Emissions and Controls as Influenced by Tillage and Crop Residue Management Strategy</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>1701</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1711</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.06.004</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lenka</surname>
<given-names>N. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jaiswal</surname>
<given-names>S. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thakur</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lenka</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mandal</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dwivedi</surname>
<given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Soil Degradation Effect on Soil Productivity, Carbon Pools and Soil Enzyme Activity</article-title>. <source>Curr. Sci.</source> <volume>112</volume>, <fpage>2434</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18520/cs/v112/i12/2434-2439</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nath</surname>
<given-names>C. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Das</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hazra</surname>
<given-names>K. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Praharaj</surname>
<given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>N. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Impact of Variable Tillage Based Residue Management and Legume Based Cropping for Seven Years on Enzymes Activity, Soil Quality index and Crop Productivity in rice Ecology</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sustai. Indic.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>100107</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.indic.2021.100107</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Oladele</surname>
<given-names>S. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Adeyemo</surname>
<given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Awodun</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Influence of rice Husk Biochar and Inorganic Fertilizer on Soil Nutrients Availability and Rain-Fed rice Yield in Two Contrasting Soils</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source> <volume>336</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.08.025</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pauleta</surname>
<given-names>S. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dell&#x2019;Acqua</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moura</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Nitrous Oxide Reductase</article-title>. <source>Coord. Chem. Rev.</source> <volume>257</volume>, <fpage>332</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>349</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ccr.2012.05.026</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ponce-Mendoza</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ceballos-Ram&#xed;rez</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gutierrez-Micelli</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dendooven</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Emission of Nitrous Oxide and Carbon Dioxide from Semi-arid Tropical Soils in Chiapas M&#xe9;xico</article-title>. <source>Rev. Bras. Ci&#xea;nc. Solo.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>1617</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1628</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/s0100-06832010000500015</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rahn</surname>
<given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bending</surname>
<given-names>G. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Turner</surname>
<given-names>M. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lillywhite</surname>
<given-names>R. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Management of N Mineralization from Crop Residues of High N Content Using Amendment Materials of Varying Quality</article-title>. <source>Soil Use Manage.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>193</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>200</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1475-2743.2003.tb00304.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Raiesi</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Carbon and N Mineralization as Affected by Soil Cultivation and Crop Residue in a Calcareous Wetland Ecosystem in Central Iran</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>112</volume>, <fpage>13</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2005.07.002</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Raul</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bharti</surname>
<given-names>V. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dar Jaffer</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lenka</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Krishna</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Sugarcane Bagasse Biochar: Suitable Amendment for Inland Aquaculture Soils</article-title>. <source>Aquac. Res.</source> <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>643</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>654</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/are.14922</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rowland</surname>
<given-names>A. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roberts</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Lignin and Cellulose Fractionation in Decomposition Studies Using Acid&#x2010;detergent Fibre Methods</article-title>. <source>Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>269</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>277</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00103629409369035</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lenka</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lenka</surname>
<given-names>N. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>A. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Raghuwanshi</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Global Warming Potential and Greenhouse Gas Emission under Different Soil Nutrient Management Practices in Soybean-Wheat System of central India</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>4603</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4612</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11356-016-8189-5</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shan</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Effects of Crop Residue Returning on Nitrous Oxide Emissions in Agricultural Soils</article-title>. <source>Atmos. Environ.</source> <volume>71</volume>, <fpage>170</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>175</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.02.009</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duan</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Organic Substitutions Aggravated Microbial Nitrogen Limitation and Decreased Nitrogen-Cycling Gene Abundances in a Three-Year Greenhouse Vegetable Field</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Environ. Manage.</source> <volume>288</volume>, <fpage>112379</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112379</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>&#x160;imon</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Czak&#xf3;</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Influence of Long-Term Application of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Soil Properties</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil Environ.</source> <volume>60</volume>, <fpage>314</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>319</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17221/264/2014-pse</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>R. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lenka</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>C. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Conservation Tillage and Manure Effect on Soil Aggregation, Yield and Energy Requirement for Wheat (<italic>Triticum aestivum</italic>) in Vertisols</article-title>. <source>Indian J.&#x20;Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>84</volume>, <fpage>267</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>271</lpage>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lenka</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lenka</surname>
<given-names>N. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trivedi</surname>
<given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhattacharjya</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sahoo</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effect of Reversal of Conservation Tillage on Soil Nutrient Availability and Crop Nutrient Uptake in Soybean in the Vertisols of Central India</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>6608</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su12166608</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Soong</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mara&#xf1;on-Jimenez</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cotrufo</surname>
<given-names>M. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boeckx</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bod&#xe9;</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guenet</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Soil Microbial CNP and Respiration Responses to Organic Matter and Nutrient Additions: Evidence from a Tropical Soil Incubation</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>122</volume>, <fpage>141</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>149</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.04.011</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Takakai</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hirano</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Harakawa</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hatakeyama</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yasuda</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sato</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Fate of Fertilizer-Derived N Applied to Enhance rice Straw Decomposition in a Paddy Field during the Fallow Season under Cool Temperature Conditions</article-title>. <source>Agriculture</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>50</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agriculture8040050</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B73">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tao</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wakelin</surname>
<given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chu</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Nitrous Oxide Emission and Denitrifier Communities in Drip-Irrigated Calcareous Soil as Affected by Chemical and Organic Fertilizers</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>612</volume>, <fpage>739</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>749</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.258</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B74">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Thomson</surname>
<given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giannopoulos</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pretty</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baggs</surname>
<given-names>E. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Richardson</surname>
<given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Biological Sources and Sinks of Nitrous Oxide and Strategies to Mitigate Emissions</article-title>. <source>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B</source> <volume>367</volume>, <fpage>1157</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1168</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rstb.2011.0415</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B75">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Toma</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hatano</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Effect of Crop Residue C:N Ratio on N2O Emissions from Gray Lowland Soil in Mikasa, Hokkaido, Japan</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>198</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>205</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1747-0765.2007.00125.x</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B76">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Troy</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <source>Effects of Temperature and Moisture Stress on Nitrous Oxide Production in Agricultural Soil</source>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>21</lpage>. <comment>Available at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.mbl.edu/ses/files/2014/09/Troy-Cynthia.pdf">https://www.mbl.edu/ses/files/2014/09/Troy-Cynthia.pdf</ext-link> (Accessed 12 August 2021)</comment>. </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B77">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ullah</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shaaban</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hugui</surname>
<given-names>R.-g.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>J.-s.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Assessing Soil Nitrous Oxide Emission as Affected by Phosphorus and Nitrogen Addition under Two Moisture Levels</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Integr. Agric.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>2865</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2872</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61353-9</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B78">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Velthof</surname>
<given-names>G. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuikman</surname>
<given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oenema</surname>
<given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Nitrous Oxide Emission from Soils Amended with Crop Residues</article-title>. <source>Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>249</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>261</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1021259107244</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B79">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Venterea</surname>
<given-names>R. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Halvorson</surname>
<given-names>A. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kitchen</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liebig</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cavigelli</surname>
<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grosso</surname>
<given-names>S. J.&#x20;D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Challenges and Opportunities for Mitigating Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Fertilized Cropping Systems</article-title>. <source>Front. Ecol. Environ.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>562</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>570</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/120062</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B80">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>X.-g.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Crop Residue Incorporation and Nitrogen Fertilizer Effects on Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Subtropical rice System in Southwest China</article-title>. <source>J.&#x20;Mt. Sci.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>1972</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1986</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11629-017-4810-4</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B81">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname>
<given-names>J.&#x20;X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiong</surname>
<given-names>Z. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khalil</surname>
<given-names>M. A. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xing</surname>
<given-names>G. X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Water Regime-Nitrogen Fertilizer-Straw Incorporation Interaction: Field Study on Nitrous Oxide Emissions from a rice Agroecosystem in Nanjing, China</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>141</volume>, <fpage>437</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>446</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2011.04.009</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B82">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Amon</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schulz</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mehdi</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Factors that Influence Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Agricultural Soils as Well as Their Representation in Simulation Models: A Review</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>770</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy11040770</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B83">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ding</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nie</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Effects of Wheat Straw Incorporation on the Availability of Soil Nutrients and Enzyme Activities in Semiarid Areas</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>e0120994</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0120994</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B84">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shaaban</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Nitrous Oxide Emissions in Response to Straw Incorporation Is Regulated by Historical Fertilization</article-title>. <source>Environ. Pollut.</source> <volume>266</volume>, <fpage>115292</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115292</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B85">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cai</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of Biochar Application on Crop Productivity, Soil Carbon Sequestration, and Global Warming Potential Controlled by Biochar C:N Ratio and Soil pH: A Global Meta-Analysis</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>213</volume>, <fpage>105125</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2021.105125</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B86">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yoon</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Phillips</surname>
<given-names>R. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname>
<given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Ecological and Physiological Implications of Nitrogen Oxide Reduction Pathways on Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Agroecosystems</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.</source> <volume>95</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/femsec/fiz066</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B87">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Impacts of Nitrogen Addition on Nitrous Oxide Emission: Comparison of Five Nitrous Oxide Modules or Algorithms</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Model.</source> <volume>421</volume>, <fpage>108963</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.108963</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B88">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zang</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuzyakov</surname>
<given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>N Fertilization Decreases Soil Organic Matter Decomposition in the Rhizosphere</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>108</volume>, <fpage>47</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>53</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.07.021</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B89">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>T. a.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>H. Y. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruan</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Global Negative Effects of Nitrogen Deposition on Soil Microbes</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>1817</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1825</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41396-018-0096-y</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B90">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zimmerman</surname>
<given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ahn</surname>
<given-names>M.-Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Positive and Negative Carbon Mineralization Priming Effects Among a Variety of Biochar-Amended Soils</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>1169</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1179</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.02.005</pub-id> </citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>