Front. Environ. Sci. Frontiers in Environmental Science Front. Environ. Sci. 2296-665X Frontiers Media S.A. 887952 10.3389/fenvs.2022.887952 Environmental Science Correction Corrigendum: Methane and Nitrous Oxide Production From Agricultural Peat Soils in Relation to Drainage Level and Abiotic and Biotic Factors Norberg et al. Corrigendum: GHG From Agricultural Peat Soils Norberg Lisbet 1 * Hellman Maria 2 Berglund Kerstin 1 Hallin Sara 2 Berglund Örjan 1 1 Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden 2 Department of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden

Edited and reviewed by: Yuncong Li, University of Florida, United States

 *Correspondence: Lisbet Norberg, lisbet.norberg@slu.se

This article was submitted to Soil Processes, a section of the journal Frontiers in Environmental Science

 26 04 2022 2022 10 887952 02 03 2022 16 03 2022 Copyright © 2022 Norberg, Hellman, Berglund, Hallin and Berglund. 2022 Norberg, Hellman, Berglund, Hallin and Berglund

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A Corrigendum on Methane and Nitrous Oxide Production From Agricultural Peat Soils in Relation to Drainage Level and Abiotic and Biotic Factors by Norberg, L., Hellman, M., Berglund, K., Hallin, S. and Berglund, Ö. (2021). Front. Environ. Sci. 9:631112. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2021.631112 histosols methane nitrous oxide functional genes suction head groundwater level

In the original article, there was a mistake in Figures 1, 2 as published. “The Figures and captions had incorrect units.” The corrected figures and captions appear below:

Soil nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes (ng kg−1 dry soil min−1) at (A) near water-saturated conditions, (B) 0.5 m water column, and (C) 1.0 m water column; and (D–F) methane (CH4) fluxes at the respective soil water suction heads. Different letters denote significantly different values of the mean (open circle, n = 7, p < 0.05). Note the different scales.

Nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes (ng kg−1 dry soil min−1) from topsoil and subsoil samples of soils 5–8 at (A) near water-saturated conditions, (B) 0.5 m water column, and (C) 1.0 m water column; and (D–F) methane (CH4) fluxes at the respective soil water suction heads. Different subscript letters denote significantly different values of the mean (open circle, n = 28, p < 0.05). Note the different scales.

The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.