Plastic pollution is among today’s most highly concerning environmental grand challenges. The need for efficient and sustainable remediation solutions using today’s science and technology is urgent (Schmaltz et al., 2020). So far, however, few technologies can be successfully applied in the world. The researchers at Duke University created the plastic pollution prevention and collect technology inventory that includes 52 technologies falling into the two categories of prevention or collection of plastic pollution (Schmaltz et al., 2020). The majority of these 52 emerging technologies were developed to collect plastic scattered in the environment, especially exemplary ones, such as “Marine Microplastic Removal Tools,” “Hoola One” and “TrashTrap” which were successfully implanted for microplastic collection (Schmaltz et al., 2020). Although the large-scale popularization and implementation of these technologies can retard plastic pollution, the financial feasibility and costs are barriers, especially in some developing countries.

What is more feasible, sustainable, and low-cost solutions to plastic pollution except for science-based and technology-based ones? Environmental education is one of the answers to this important and urgent issue. Recently, some related research was carried out. Cordier et al. developed one worldwide socio-economic model to forecast the influence of lack of education plastic pollution by using the data of the World Bank and pointed out that the amount of inadequately managed plastic waste will decrease by 34% compared to the business-as-usual scenario (Cordier et al., 2021). Soares et al. presented a study on the perceived importance of education and knowledge dissemination strategies on the mitigation of plastic pollution (Soares et al., 2021). This article is one of the few studies currently focusing on the pathway to minimize plastic pollution through environmental education. Additionally, the authors firstly pointed out environmental education should be included in the first 9 years of education (Soares et al., 2021). Undoubtedly, the contribution of these researches provides a permanent solution at low cost to plastic pollution from the perspective of environmental awareness and actual pro-environmental behavior. In this paper, we discussed the value of education in solving plastic pollution inspired by the search of Cordier et al. (2021); Soares et al. (2021).

Environmental education has been considered as one of the important factors in the research about the socioeconomic impact on plastic pollution, although the related researches are scarce. Vicente-Molina et al. (2013) concluded that a 1% increase in individual environmental knowledge leads to a 0.4% increase in environmental behavior among university students through model estimation. Gifford and Nilsson concluded that individuals with more education are more concerned about environmental issues, which directly supports the hypothesized relationship between environmental awareness of individuals, especially pro-environmental concern and behavior, and education (Gifford and Nilsson, 2014). Hidalgo-Ruz et al. (2018) also found out a tendency of anthropogenic marine debris abundances to increase in the country with the lowest Education Index (Mean and Expected Years of Schooling) and pointed out that the environmental awareness and pro-environmental concern and behavior of the public will be increased through an educational program, such as environmental campaigns, and the changes of plastic pollution over time might be related to the educational conditions of a country. The prediction model developed by Mateo Cordier and coauthors indicated that the amount of inadequately managed plastic waste decreases by 34% in the “extending education” scenario when compared with the business-as-usual scenario in 2050 (Cordier et al., 2021). Soares et al. (2021) concluded that a higher level of education is significantly and directly related to the environmental awareness of and actual pro-environmental behavior in plastic problems, though a clear causal relationship among them has not been establishe. Education has been identified as a critical factor to explain high levels of environmental behavior in research, which might be a promising solution to plastic pollution (Cordier et al., 2021).

Environmental education, especially nature-based environmental education related to ecosystem preservation in primary and secondary schools, is a first step in solving the planet’s environmental problems, which provides a promising solution to mitigate plastic pollution among young people (Hammami et al., 2017) (Mandrikas et al., 2021; Soares et al., 2021). For example, a program called Plastic Free Schools aims to measurably reduce plastic pollution in a global community of schools, colleges, and universities. Plastic straws, disposable plastic shopping bags, plastic delivery packaging, plastic bottles will be gradually reduced and ultimately eliminated in participating schools. In the program, environmental education programs and campaigns will inspire students to investigate the plastic waste stream in daily life, which will gradually promote more responsible behaviors in young citizens. Correspondingly, environmental awareness and behavior rather than knowledge alone are incorporated through curriculum innovation design by educators, which will tenderly and subtly turn the tide on plastic pollution at a low cost in the future (Hartley et al., 2018). Further, education administrators are willing to make policy changes.

However, school education is not the only form of environmental education. Consumption behavior guidance and eco-friendly tips for the public on reuse and recycling instead of throwaway culture and fast fashion are important pre-consumption and post-consumption efforts. In pre-consumption guidance, the reduction, and replacement of disposable products in daily life are swift and effective solutions to plastic pollution at the usage stage. By contrast, the solutions to plastic waste management including disposal, collection, and recycling for individuals through environmental education is more effective to reduce microplastic pollution. The research of Borrelle et al. and Lau et al. both indicated that pre-consumption and post-consumption strategies achieve a reduction of plastic pollution by more than 50% when applied individually compared to the business-as-usual scenario (Borrelle et al., 2020; Lau et al., 2020).

It will be a long and difficult way to thoroughly eliminate plastic pollution on the Earth. The capacity to prevent plastic pollution on a large-scale through emerging technology solely is very limited. However, the time for mitigation of plastic pollution with multidisciplinary solutions in our world is now. Environmental education is the permanent resolution of plastic pollution, which should be and will be a vital and indispensable section of science-based and technology-based solutions to plastic pollution. How to mitigate and minimize plastic pollution through environmental education is a novel challenge not only for educators but the public, indeed the whole human. Environmental education at multilevel, such as family, school, and social education through holistic methods, even a cross-regional, and global education cooperation to address plastic pollution are the next steps in the future. Lastly, reconnecting with nature to value its biodiversity and benefits provided through education may further help to mitigate plastic pollution.