AUTHOR=Koch Maurizio , Maraolo Alberto Enrico , Natoli Giuseppe , Corrao Salvatore TITLE=Preventing acute diverticulitis. any roles for non-absorbable antibiotics? in search of evidence: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis JOURNAL=Frontiers in Gastroenterology VOLUME=Volume 2 - 2023 YEAR=2023 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/gastroenterology/articles/10.3389/fgstr.2023.1170271 DOI=10.3389/fgstr.2023.1170271 ISSN=2813-1169 ABSTRACT=SUMMARY Background Hospital admissions for diverticulitis, a complication of diverticular disease, are very much on the increase. Prevention of diverticulitis could cut costs and save lives. Aims To identify whether the risk of the first episode of diverticulitis (primary prevention) or recurrence of diverticulitis (secondary prevention) can be reduced in patients with diverticular disease using non-absorbable antibiotics (mainly rifaximin). Methods The studies were identified by searching PubMed and CENTRAL from 1990 to May 2022. The methodological quality of each study was evaluated. The outcome of the meta-analysis was the occurrence of a first or subsequent episode of diverticulitis. In addition, a trial sequential analysis was performed to assess whether the results would be subject to type I or type II errors. Results Primary prevention: the risk difference was statistically significant in favor of rifaximin (-0,019, or -1.9%, CI -0,6 to -3,3%). There was no evidence of heterogeneity (I2 0%). At one year, two years, and eight years of age, the NNT was 62, 52, and 42, respectively. The level of evidence had a moderate degree of certainty. Secondary prevention: the risk difference was statistically significant in favor of rifaximin (- 0,24, or -24%, CI -47 to -2%). There was evidence of heterogeneity (I2 92%); NNT resulted in 5. The grade level was low. Conclusions Rifaximin can reduce the risk of a first episode of diverticulitis. However, the cost-benefit ratio currently appears too high. Rifaximin could also reduce the risk of a second episode, but the quality of the evidence is low. PROSPERO database number [379258].