AUTHOR=Nayak Swetalina , Nayak Mamata , Nayak Soumya Ranjan , Parida Debasini , Mishra Bijaya Kumar , Sinha Abhinav , Pati Sanghamitra , Delanerolle Gayathri , Phiri Peter , Shetty Ashish , Elneil Sohier , Rout Biswabara , Turuk Jyotirmayee , Palo Subrata Kumar 

TITLE=Menstrual hygiene management practices among rural females: findings from a rural health demographic environmental surveillance system (HDESS) cohort in Odisha, Eastern India

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Global Women's Health

VOLUME=Volume 6 - 2025

YEAR=2025

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/global-womens-health/articles/10.3389/fgwh.2025.1617970

DOI=10.3389/fgwh.2025.1617970

ISSN=2673-5059

ABSTRACT=IntroductionMenstrual hygiene management is an important public health component to promote reproductive health, especially in rural areas of low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). Present study assessed the menstrual hygiene practices, the disposal methods and associated health effects among school students, college students, and community women in rural setting of a Health Demographic Environmental Surveillance System (HDESS) in Odisha, India.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was carried out in March-May 2023 using three cohorts of participants, namely school students, college students, and community women aged between 14 and 49 years and currently experiencing cycles of menstruation. The study used a multi-stage random sampling method with a descriptive analysis comparing patterns of sanitary pad use, its disposal practice and complications linked to the use of pads. Continuous variables such as age and cost incurred on menstrual products were reported using mean and standard deviation. The chi-squared value was used to determine possible associations and affirm the statistical significance, p-value (<0.05).ResultsAmong 622 participants, 541 (86.9%) reported using sanitary pads. Cloth users rated their experience as “excellent” (48.7%), while dissatisfaction was highest among government-provided pad users (29.7%). Self-procured pad users reported the highest “manageable” experience (44.9%). The most common method of disposing the sanitary materials was by burying (40.2%). Approximately 68.32% of participants reported menstruation related health issues whilst 23.9% reported sanitary pad-related issues. About 16.8% of the participants reported of menstrual irregularities, school students being the most (44.8%).DiscussionThe use of disposable sanitary pads appear to be the most common menstrual hygiene management practice in rural areas. Awareness, shame, and costs could be barriers to accessing sanitary pads along with poor environmental impact when disposing of these using improper methods. Reform the policy by introducing awareness of overall health implications linked to menstrual hygiene and access to low-cost menstrual management products could promote reproductive health. Also, government partnerships with NGOs to implement village-level menstrual waste management systems, subsidies for eco-friendly pad production, and mandatory disposal education in school health programs could mitigate the problem.