<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
    <rss version="2.0">
      <channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
        <title>Frontiers in Health Services | Implementation Science section | New and Recent Articles</title>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/health-services/sections/implementation-science</link>
        <description>RSS Feed for Implementation Science section in the Frontiers in Health Services journal | New and Recent Articles</description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <generator>Frontiers Feed Generator,version:1</generator>
        <pubDate>2026-05-13T12:23:18.781+00:00</pubDate>
        <ttl>60</ttl>
        <item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1837215</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1837215</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Usability and feasibility of the longitudinal implementation strategy tracking system: a think-aloud study with implementation researchers]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-05-12T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>James L. Merle</author><author>Justin D. Smith</author>
        <description><![CDATA[IntroductionTracking implementation strategies and their adaptations over time remains a persistent methodological challenge in health services research. The Longitudinal Implementation Strategy Tracking System (LISTS) was developed to support structured, longitudinal documentation of strategies, modifications, and discontinuations aligned with established implementation science frameworks using timeline follow-back procedures and an open-access web-based platform. The study objective was to evaluate the usability, feasibility, and methodological fit of the open-access web-based LISTS platform using a structured think-aloud protocol with implementation researchers.MethodsNine implementation researchers completed structured think-aloud usability sessions while performing core LISTS tasks, including project setup, strategy entry, bundling, modification logging, discontinuation tracking, and dashboard exploration. Sessions were transcribed and analyzed using hybrid deductive-inductive thematic analysis. Participants also completed the System Usability Scale (SUS) and NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX).ResultsThe mean SUS score was 76.94, indicating good perceived usability, and mean NASA-TLX workload was low (1.98 on a 1–7 scale). Qualitative findings revealed consistent endorsement of LISTS' structured longitudinal tracking and theoretical alignment with well-known frameworks. Usability barriers included terminology density, multi-level unit hierarchy confusion, and ambiguity in modification-tracking workflows. A cross-cutting tension emerged between theoretical fidelity and accessibility for non-expert users. Despite conceptual friction, participants completed tasks successfully and rated the system positively overall.DiscussionLISTS demonstrates strong conceptual rigor and functional usability among implementation researchers. However, refinements to terminology scaffolding, hierarchical logic, and modification workflows are needed to enhance accessibility and scalability beyond expert users. Findings highlight broad challenges and considerations for translating implementation science theory and terminology into practical digital infrastructure.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1796984</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1796984</link>
        <title><![CDATA[The development of a multi-level intervention to improve data quality of the national quality indicators in Swiss long-term care facilities using an Intervention Mapping approach]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-05-11T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Magdalena Osińska</author><author>Daniela Braun</author><author>Sonja Baumann</author><author>Brigitte Benkert</author><author>Nereide Curreri</author><author>Jianan Huang</author><author>Michael Simon</author><author>Bastiaan Van Grootven</author><author>Franziska Zúñiga</author>
        <description><![CDATA[IntroductionQuality indicators (QIs) are used internationally to monitor performance and support continuous quality improvement. Their usefulness is dependent on the quality of the underlying data. Research indicates multiple barriers to reliable and accurate data collection in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). This paper describes the systematic development of an intervention to improve quality of QI data in LTCFs.MethodsThe 6-step Intervention Mapping (IM) protocol guided the development process. 1) Needs assessment was done with an ethnographic study. 2) Intervention objectives were formulated followed by the selection of behavioral determinants. 3) Intervention design was based on evidence reviews, focus groups with LTCF staff and behavioral change methods. 4) Intervention materials and messages were developed in collaboration with stakeholders and external experts. We also developed 5) the implementation and 6) evaluation plan.ResultsThe needs assessment identified lack of awareness and knowledge, negative attitudes towards QI measurement, and environmental barriers. Having a person responsible for the topic, as well as monitoring and using QI data were seen as facilitators for data quality. The designed intervention uses a train-the-trainer approach. It consists of a training concept and support materials. The training aims to prepare champions to support their teams and lead data quality improvement activities: data quality monitoring, feedback, and internal staff trainings. The developed materials include a training handbook, lesson plans, presentations, factsheets, posters, and checklists. Other support measures included adapting QI measurement and providing an email contact for QI-related questions.ConclusionThe program theory and design rationale for this intervention will support the planned evaluation study, facilitate comparisons across similar interventions, and potentially inform the development of other interventions in LTCFs.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1731352</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1731352</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Health technology design considerations specific to Indigenous Data Sovereignty and implementation science]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-05-07T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Community Case Study</category>
        <author>Alec J. Calac</author><author>Tiana McMann</author><author>Joseph Yracheta</author><author>Tim K. Mackey</author>
        <description><![CDATA[There is growing attention to the importance of Indigenous Data Sovereignty (IDS) in the practice of medicine and public health, especially in the United States. Through a multi-year research collaborative between the University of California, San Diego and the Native BioData Consortium, it became clear that the use of an implementation science framework might guide the design of emerging digital health technologies best respecting the interests and priorities of Indigenous Peoples. In this Case Study, we discuss the integration of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) to inform the design of policies, programs, and interventions focused on improving Indigenous health. We explore the movement for IDS from the perspective of contextual concerns raised by Indigenous Peoples, researchers, and their allies specific to the design and implementation of digital technologies primarily in a North American context. We then explain how CFIR, ERIC, and similar resources can be used to design digital health technologies for use in Indigenous contexts.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1788089</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1788089</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Examining perceptions, social, and policy factors influencing hepatitis B birth-dose vaccine uptake: a PEN-3 cultural model mixed-methods study of healthcare workers in Nigeria]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-05-07T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Olufunto A. Olusanya</author><author>Oluwakorede Adedeji</author><author>Caven Ngoe</author><author>David Oladele</author><author>Adesola Z. Musa</author><author>Maria Afadapa</author><author>Titi Gbaja-Biamila</author><author>Ifeoma Eugenia Idigbe</author><author>Peter Kalulu</author><author>Nkiruka Obodoechina</author><author>Temitope Ojo</author><author>Folahanmi Akinsolu</author><author>Abideen Salako</author><author>Joseph Ogbeh</author><author>Chiamaka Odinammadu</author><author>Ucheoma Nwaozuru</author><author>Kristi L. Foley</author><author>Agatha Wapmuk</author><author>Hong Xian</author><author>Jason J. Ong</author><author>Peyton Thompson</author><author>Oluwaseun Falade-Nwulia</author><author>Suzanne Day</author><author>Joseph D. Tucker</author><author>Oliver Chukwujekwu Ezechi</author><author>Juliet Iwelunmor</author>
        <description><![CDATA[IntroductionThe timely administration of the birth-dose hepatitis B (HepB-BD) vaccine is recommended by global and national guidelines to effectively prevent perinatal transmission. In high-disease-burden countries, such as Nigeria, the adoption of the HepB-BD vaccine remains limited. Emerging global policy discussions highlight the need to examine healthcare workers’ (HCWs’) perceptions of pediatric vaccination guidelines, the safety and effectiveness of the HepB-BD vaccine, and how family, social support, and community factors influence vaccine delivery.MethodsA convergent mixed-methods study of HCWs was conducted in Nigeria between July and August 2024. Using the PEN-3 Cultural Model as our framework, we concurrently administered quantitative surveys and conducted in-depth qualitative interviews and focus group discussions to assess knowledge, beliefs, and peer influences related to HepB-BD vaccinations. We also explored HCWs’ perceptions, enabling factors, and social influences that impact vaccine delivery. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.ResultsMost participants were women (87.8%), nurses (24.4%), and community extension workers (14.6%), with an average age of 32.5 years. Over half perceived HepB-BD vaccines as extremely safe (61%) and effective (63.4%). Participants strongly agreed that birth vaccination is recommended (80.5%), ethically appropriate (68.3%), and that its benefits outweigh side effects (63.4%). Most respondents reported professional autonomy in birth-dose decisions: 51.2% strongly disagreed that family opinions influenced their decisions, and 48.8% strongly disagreed that family/friends were concerned about their administering the vaccine. Qualitative themes included perceptions of barriers (poor knowledge, limited vaccine stock, misinformation), enablers (transportation and cold chain reliability), and nurturing factors (the role of training and collaboration with traditional birth attendants). Misconceptions included linking vaccines to sexually transmitted infections and concerns about fragile newborn immunity.ConclusionHepB-BD vaccine delivery by HCWs is influenced by a complex interplay of multiple factors, including perceptions, structural enablers, and social relationships. As global policies continue to evolve, programs should adopt culturally responsive, context-specific strategies to address these multi-level influences and foster HCW trust, thereby ensuring the timely delivery of the HepB-BD vaccine.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1676416</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1676416</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Advancing healthcare worker safety in an academic hospital setting: a mixed methods quality improvement initiative protocol]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-05-01T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Study Protocol</category>
        <author>Seema Sharma</author><author>Lee de Bie</author><author>Carrie Fletcher</author><author>Myanca Rodrigues</author><author>Brianna Depestel</author><author>Brooke Cowell</author><author>Sahar Monzavi-Bacon</author><author>Christina Bowman</author><author>Adam J. Prieur</author><author>Charlie Puma</author><author>Kwasi Adu-Basowah</author><author>Carly Weeks</author><author>Christian Rabbat</author><author>Lehana Thabane</author><author>Mike Heenan</author>
        <description><![CDATA[BackgroundThere is growing evidence that workplace violence (WPV) including physical, verbal, psychological, racial and sexual violence against healthcare workers (HCW) is a globally increasing burden, with serious negative effects on the wellbeing of healthcare workers and deleterious outcomes for patients and healthcare systems. Many healthcare systems have put in place some evidence-based programs to combat WPV to provide the most safe and supportive environment while providing the highest quality, safe and compassionate care to their communities. However, the incidence of WPV continues to escalate.ObjectivesThe aim of this paper is to describe the methodology for quality improvement initiative to advance safety culture, by addressing WPV at St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton (SJHH), an academic Health Sciences Centre which is part of the St Joseph's Health System in Ontario, Canada. The objectives are to: (i) assess barriers and facilitators to physician reporting of WPV incidents; (ii) evaluate gaps in existing WPV data and reporting systems; (iii) identify system-level opportunities to improve WPV prevention and response; and (iv) monitor changes in WPV related outcomes over time, including reporting rates, incident trends, and priorities identified through staff engagement.MethodsWe set up the Workplace Safety Governance Committee as an advisory body to champion our strategy against WPV. Building on the work of an operational Prevention of Violence in the Workplace Committee and relying on a set of guiding principles, the Committee will use a multi component quality improvement approach informed by mixed methods that includes: (i) conducting a scoping review on physician reporting of WPV incidents; (ii) participating in an audit conducted by the Institute of Healthcare Improvement of our current practices and structures and to identify areas for improvement; (iii) engaging with provincial Workplace Safety and Insurance Board regarding mental stress injuries at SJHH, including a comparison with similar organizations; (iv) doing ‘rounds' in different hospital units to elicit concerns and advance open communication about WPV, to generate ideas for solutions and to provide regular updates and communication to share progress updates on the Committee work.Outcomes and analysisWe will use descriptive statistics and process charts to display trends over time in order to monitor changes and progress on different types of WPV related outcomes. We will also use qualitative descriptions to capture themes from the scoping review and audit.DiscussionWPV against HCW is a major barrier to achieving the goal of better health outcomes for patients and HCW. As part of the organization's 2024–25 priorities, SJHH is committed to fostering a physically and psychologically safe environment for our healthcare workers, volunteers and learners. Our quality improvement initiative consists of robust methodological approach using mixed evidence-based methods for data collection from different sources, including a survey of the literature, engagement of external stakeholder expertise on WPV and a review of our current practices and standards.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1779684</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1779684</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Stimulating co-production in healthcare quality improvement: raising the interest of health professionals to collaborate with patients]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-04-30T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Perspective</category>
        <author>Mats Brommels</author>
        <description><![CDATA[There is ample evidence that patients contribute substantially to quality improvement, i.a. by offering perspectives and opportunities for improvement not necessarily noticed by professionals and managers and increasing the patient-centredness of improved care processes. The literature on co-producing quality improvement highlights mostly structural and organisational barriers to patient involvement. However, several studies report about health professionals being sceptical to patient co-production in general and the same attitude might prevent them from engaging in collaboration in quality improvement. The vast literature on professional practice change, including changes informed by new scientific evidence and required by clinical guidelines, show the value of interventions guided by theories from social psychology. In this paper advice is sought from those theories on how to increase the willingness of health professionals to co-produce QI with patients. Based on a synthesis of that analysis the following recommendations are formulated: Showing the benefits of patient involvement to professionals and how those resonate with their professional beliefs and goals will have a positive effect on their attitudes towards co-production. Engaging professional champions to lead QI will create social pressure and establish norms that will attract other professionals to participate. Enabling professionals to actively participate in designing the improvement processes will provide them with a sense of control of their working conditions that will increase their intrinsic motivation. Institutionalising co-produced quality improvement as organisational routines will show professionals that QI is an ordinary day-today activity that will enrich their clinical practice.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1735411</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1735411</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Predicting recreational therapy engagement in veterans’ long-term care: a machine learning approach]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-04-30T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Mohammad Najeh Samara</author><author>Kimberly D. Harry</author><author>Brittany Weissman</author><author>Kara V. Dopp</author>
        <description><![CDATA[BackgroundThere is limited understanding regarding the factors that predict recreational therapy engagement among veterans in long-term care facilities. We aimed to develop and validate machine learning models to predict recreational therapy participation and identify key factors influencing engagement patterns among veterans in long-term care facilities.MethodsIn this cross-sectional observational study, we used data from 57 veterans aged 18 years and above at the New York State Veterans Home at Oxford. Data were collected through a comprehensive self-administered survey capturing demographic characteristics, participation patterns, and activity preferences. Two binary outcome variables were constructed: high participation and any participation. Five machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, Decision Tree, Gradient Boosting, and Logistic Regression with L1 and L2 regularization) were systematically evaluated using Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation for high participation and 5-fold Stratified Cross-Validation for any participation. Feature selection was implemented using SelectKBest with f_classif scoring, and class imbalance was addressed through balanced weighting techniques.ResultsRandom Forest emerged as the optimal algorithm for both prediction tasks, achieving F1-scores of 0.860 ± 0.347 for high participation prediction and balanced accuracy of 0.619 ± 0.081 for any participation prediction. Feature importance analysis revealed activity preference diversity (Gini importance: 0.293) and total preferences (0.254) as the primary predictors of high participation, while facility tenure (0.268) was the strongest predictor of any participation. Veterans with preference diversity >4.5 activities combined with satisfaction scores >3.84 achieved 100% observed probability of sustained high participation [n = 5; 95% exact binomial CI: (47.8%, 100%)], though this estimate should be interpreted cautiously given the small subgroup size. New residents (≤1.5 years) with limited preferences demonstrated the highest risk for non-participation. Group activities (Gini importance: 0.143) and spiritual activities (Gini importance: 0.100–0.101) emerged as significant predictors across both models.ConclusionsThis research provides the first proof-of-concept demonstration of a machine learning approach for predicting recreational therapy engagement among veterans in long-term care facilities, establishing methodological feasibility and generating testable hypotheses for prospective multi-site validation. Activity preference diversity and facility tenure serve as primary determinants of participation, with a critical 1.5-year adaptation period identified for intervention targeting. These predictive models can be applied during admission or early in residency to identify veterans at risk of low participation, enabling recreational therapy staff to implement tailored, proactive engagement strategies before disengagement occurs.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1764829</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1764829</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Integrating screening and management of mental disorders, including substance use disorders into other non-communicable disease care: insights from theory-informed implementation strategies creation for implementation model M0 in Faridabad, India as part of ICMR-MINDS project]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-04-23T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Yatan Pal Singh Balhara</author><author>Parag Bhardwaj</author><author>Siddharth Sarkar</author><author>Hitesh Verma</author><author>Kuldeep Singh</author><author>Gerish Atri</author><author>Om Pal Singh Saini</author><author>Hanspreet Kang</author><author>Pulkit Verma</author><author>Ashoo Grover</author><author>Neha Dahiya</author>
        <description><![CDATA[BackgroundMental disorders, including substance use disorders (MSUD) frequently co-occur with other Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs). This leads to increased morbidity, premature mortality, and reduced quality of life. In India, services for MSUD are usually delivered separately from NCD care. This study aimed to develop a theory-informed and context-specific set of implementation strategies as part of Model M0 for integration of screening and management of MSUD into existing NCD care in public health facilities in Faridabad district of Haryana. This work addresses a major service gap in the public health system and provides a structured, practical approach for integration.MethodsImplementation Mapping, updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) taxonomy, Theoretical Domains Framework and Capability, Opportunity, Motivation – Behavior model were used to design and tailor implementation strategies. Mixed-methods formative assessment was carried out. The stakeholders (actors) included the health system leaders (policy makers and state and district health authorities), facility-level healthcare professionals, and patients/service users and caregivers. The barriers, facilitators, and determinants were identified. Co-creation meetings were held with stakeholders. A set of ERIC strategies were operationalized through contextually appropriate actions and materials.ResultsA comprehensive, theory-informed implementation model (Model M0) integrating 51 ERIC strategies across domains such as capacity building, clinical workflow optimization, stakeholder engagement, and data systems strengthening was created. Multiple co-creation meetings conducted with various stakeholders at the level of state, district, and health facility benefited from and incorporated the perspectives and inputs from them. Strategies were mapped to specific change objectives and stakeholders, including patients/service users and caregivers, health care professionals, and health system leaders (policy makers and state and district health authorities). Specific actions and target actors (stakeholders) for each of the strategies were identified. The model M0 included the set of implementation strategies; the interventions (innovations), implementation materials (practical tools and protocols) and indicators to assess process, implementation, patient/clinical, and service outcomes.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the feasibility of applying a structured implementation science approach to design context-sensitive strategies for integrating services for MSUD into existing NCD care in public health facilities in Faridabad district of Haryana. The implementation Model M0 offers a clear roadmap for how integration can be carried out in routine practice. The recommended way forward is to pilot, review, and refine this model. This will be followed by scale-up within the district and evaluation. The approach may also be useful for other low- and middle-income countries aiming to strengthen integrated care for MSUD within NCD programs.Clinical Trial Registrationhttps://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?EncHid=MTEzMTg4&Enc=&userName=, identifier CTRI/2024/08/072748.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1690832</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1690832</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Rule-based clinical decision support system for automated assessment of left ventricular diastolic function during stress echocardiography]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-04-15T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Gulnora Rozikhodjaeva</author><author>Omonulla Juraev</author><author>H.-Christian Brauweiler</author><author>Tom Schaal</author>
        <description><![CDATA[BackgroundHeart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging to diagnose due to the complexity of diastolic function assessment during stress echocardiography, where multiple hemodynamic parameters must be evaluated under time pressure. Explainable artificial intelligence, specifically rule-based Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS), offers promising improvements in reproducibility and interpretability.MethodsA rule-based CDSS was developed and clinically validated to automate left ventricular diastolic function assessment during semi-supine bicycle stress echocardiography. A prospective cohort of 134 patients (mean age 61.3 ± 8.7 years) with exertional dyspnea and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF >50%) was enrolled, excluding individuals with significant valvular pathologies, arrhythmias, or unstable ischemia. Echocardiographic and Doppler data were collected using Toshiba Aplio500 and Esaote MyLabSIGMA systems. The algorithm incorporated manual input of measurements, computed derived indices (e.g., diastolic reserve index, myocardial stiffness, vascular resistance), and applied rule-based logic in accordance with ASE/EACVI (2016/2022) guidelines and the ESC HFpEF consensus.ResultsThe CDSS generated diagnostic conclusions within 3 min per case, matching expert assessments in 93% of cases and correctly identifying stress-induced diastolic dysfunction in 85%. It demonstrated high diagnostic agreement (ICC > 0.94) and discrimination (AUC = 0.92). Rule-based outputs, such as “Impaired diastolic reserve” or “Right ventricular dysfunction under load,” were based on combinations of parameters (e.g., E/e′ > 15, Δe′ ≤ 0, TAPSE < 17 mm, PCWR > 12 mmHg).ConclusionThe explainable, guideline-compliant CDSS enables real-time, transparent analysis of diastolic function, supporting improved diagnostic consistency and augmented physician decision-making in cardiovascular care.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1770265</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1770265</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Transcultural utility in the implementation of digital SRH interventions in sub-saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-04-13T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Study Protocol</category>
        <author>Relebohile Ntsoane</author><author>Mathildah Mpata Mokgatle</author><author>Elizabeth Nkabane-Nkholongo</author><author>B. W. Jack</author>
        <description><![CDATA[BackgroundDigital health interventions (DHIs) have gained momentum in improving access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) education and services. DHIs are increasingly recognised for reducing healthcare providers' workload, minimizing patients' long waiting times, and decreasing the distance patients must walk to access health care, thereby enhancing the quality of health services. However, the limited cultural adaptation of DHIs has undermined their usability and acceptability for improving SRH education. Evidence in sub-Saharan Africa indicates that DHIs often fall short of achieving the expected outcomes because they lack cultural relevance and are misaligned with local belief systems and sociocultural contexts. Given these gaps, this scoping review aims to systematically map existing SRH education initiatives that utilize DHIs, to assess the extent of cultural adaptation and to identify evidence-based strategies that could enhance transcultural utility in SRH DHIs.Methods and analysisThis scoping review will be guided by the framework of Arksey and O'Malley. A systematic search will be undertaken across major sources, such as PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and other relevant sources. The review selection process will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (Prisma-ScR) flow diagram to ensure transparency, and EndNote will be used to eliminate duplicates during the selection of eligible studies. Eligible studies will be screened against predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and data will be charted to capture key characteristics, and by paying particular attention to cultural adaptation strategies of SRH-focused DHIs. Findings will be synthesised to map the current evidence base and highlight gaps for future research and practice.Clinical Trial RegistrationThis scoping review protocol was registered with Open Science Framework and can be accessed at https://osf.io/fx75p.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1799760</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1799760</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Cross-cultural adaptation of an implementation science glossary into simplified Chinese: study protocol]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-04-07T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Study Protocol</category>
        <author>Xiaomeng Ye</author><author>Wyatt Xixuan Wu</author><author>Tina Yen-Ting Chen</author><author>Qian Yang</author><author>Nick Sevdalis</author>
        <description><![CDATA[IntroductionImplementation science (IS) relies on standardized terminology, yet existing glossaries are largely English and Western-centric, creating risks of misinterpretation in other contexts. In China, with over one billion Chinese speakers and a rapidly expanding IS community, the absence of a unified glossary hinders training and knowledge exchange. We report a prospective, multi-stage cultural and linguistic adaptation study of the Implementation Science Research Glossary produced by the Centre for Implementation Science at King's College London, UK, from its original English version into Simplified Chinese.MethodsThis study follows an established cross-cultural adaptation framework, modified to reflect the nature of a glossary rather than a psychometric instrument. The process includes: (1) forward translation of the English glossary into Simplified Chinese by a bilingual translator with IS expertise; (2) independent back translation by another bilingual individual blinded to the original glossary; (3) structured reconciliation involving the forward translator, back translator, and an additional reviewer with IS knowledge; (4) first expert panel review—conducted by 5 experts in IS and public health, who will also participate in the final review—to assess semantic, idiomatic, experiential, and conceptual equivalence, leading to a refined version of the glossary; consensus will be defined a priori as ≥80% agreement on each term and definition (5) evaluation of the refined glossary through two complementary quantitative validation procedures: (a) content validation by 6–10 eligible faculty members using the Content Validity Index (CVI), and (b) response process validation by 10–30 Chinese-speaking postgraduate students using the Face Validity Index (FVI); items will be considered acceptable if I-CVI ≥0.83 and glossary-level S-CVI/Ave ≥0.90 for content validity, and I-FVI ≥0.80 with glossary-level S-FVI/Ave ≥0.90 for face validity; and (6) final expert panel review to reach consensus on the adapted glossary. Ethical approval will be obtained prior to data collection.DiscussionThe study will produce the first, to our knowledge, culturally and linguistically adapted IS glossary for Chinese-speaking contexts. This resource is expected to enhance clarity and accessibility of implementation concepts, supporting research and practice in local settings. The documented adaptation process will provide a methodological reference for future translation of IS resources in other languages.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1800608</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1800608</link>
        <title><![CDATA[The theory behind the strategies: interpreting the expert recommendations for implementing change taxonomy through four behavioural lenses]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-04-02T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Hypothesis and Theory</category>
        <author>Per Nilsen</author><author>Kristin Thomas</author><author>Hanna Augustsson Öfverström</author><author>Maria Fagerström</author><author>Kathrine Hald</author><author>Jeanette Wassar Kirk</author>
        <description><![CDATA[BackgroundImplementation strategies are essential for promoting the uptake of evidence-based practices, yet they are often applied without explicit attention to their theoretical foundations. The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) taxonomy identifies nine strategy categories, but work on exploring the assumptions underlying how these strategies bring about behaviour change is limited. This study aimed to clarify the theoretical bases of ERIC strategies to strengthen conceptual understanding and guide strategy selection.MethodsWe conducted a conceptual analysis of the nine ERIC strategy categories and examined how each aligns with four major perspectives on behaviour change: behaviourism, social cognitivism, dual-process models, and culture. We identified the implicit assumptions about change processes for each category and interpreted these through the four lenses to compare convergences and divergences in their explanatory mechanisms.ResultsEach theoretical perspective highlighted distinct yet complementary pathways through which implementation strategies operate. Behaviourism emphasized reinforcement and environmental cues; social cognitivism focused on self-efficacy, motivation, and social learning; dual-process models distinguished between automatic and reflective cognitive systems; and cultural perspectives underscored the influence of shared norms and values. Mapping ERIC categories through these perspectives revealed overlaps and tensions, such as between extrinsic reinforcement and intrinsic motivation, or between individual-level processes and collective cultural alignment.ConclusionsImplementation strategies are not theory-neutral but rest on implicit assumptions about how behaviour changes. Clarifying these assumptions reveals why strategies vary in effectiveness across contexts and provides a foundation for more deliberate, theory-informed strategy selection and evaluation. Integrating behavioural, cognitive, and cultural perspectives offers a multidimensional understanding of change processes, enabling researchers and practitioners to design strategies that are contextually aligned, theoretically coherent, and more likely to produce sustainable outcomes.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1793055</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1793055</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Implementing group metacognitive therapy to improve mental health in NHS cardiac rehabilitation: the PATHWAY beacons study of adoption, adherence and data capture]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-03-26T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Adrian Wells</author><author>Andrew Belcher</author><author>David Reeves</author><author>Patrick Doherty</author><author>Paul Wilson</author><author>Lora Capobianco</author>
        <description><![CDATA[AimsAnxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress symptoms are common in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) patients. Group metacognitive therapy (MCT) alongside CR can significantly improve such symptoms compared to usual care. We aimed to conduct the first implementation study of group-MCT in NHS CR services. The objectives were: 1. Establish sites and assess levels of adoption; 2. Revise and pilot data capture via national auditing systems to assess MCT attendance and uptake; 3. Assess site-level MCT-adherence under roll-out conditions.MethodsA mixed-methods study evaluated implementation of group-MCT in routine care in CR services. Services across England were recruited as early adopters and staff were trained. The National Audit of Cardiac Rehabilitation (NACR) database was modified to collect and assess performance of group-MCT data capture. Five implementation outcomes were assessed; uptake and adherence, data-capture and quality, patient characteristics, site-level of adoption, and treatment adherence.ResultsTwenty-six courses of group-MCT were delivered across six services, with an average of 4.3 courses per site and 131 patients receiving treatment. 82.4% of patients attended at least four sessions. Five services met all outcomes and were classed as green; one failed on one criterion and was rated amber. Data capture worked but with some minor discrepancies. Levels of intervention adherence were excellent, with high consistency across sites and time.ConclusionsWe established six sites meeting our recruitment threshold and demonstrated satisfactory data capture on MCT attendance and uptake via national auditing systems. Five out of six sites met all adoption criteria. Site level adherence and compliance was excellent at 86.7%. Wider-scale adoption could improve access to evidence-based psychological therapy and enhance outcomes across the 188 CR-services in England.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1767083</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1767083</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Navigating paradox in child welfare: implications for improvement science in complex human service systems]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-03-25T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Christina Evaldsson</author><author>Sofia Kjellström</author>
        <description><![CDATA[IntroductionImprovement science emphasizes the need to understand and enhance quality in complex service systems. While the field primarily has developed within healthcare, its expansion into social care requires deeper engagement with how quality is understood and enacted in practice. This study addresses this need by exploring how child welfare professionals in Sweden understand and enact “quality” in their everyday work with implications for improvement science in complex human service systems.MethodsThe study employed a qualitative, practice-oriented, and interactive research design. The data consisted of 28 semi-structured interviews with professionals in child welfare, an analysis seminar, and documents (such as a quality management system and quality reports). An inductive content analysis was conducted, constructing themes through systematic interpretation rather than predefined frameworks.ResultsThe analysis identified two coexisting logics of quality: one emphasizing uniformity, the other emphasizing responsiveness to uniqueness. The findings show how professionals move between these logics as tensions become salient in daily practice.DiscussionBy conceptualizing quality as a paradoxical construct, the study highlights how quality in child welfare is enacted through the ongoing negotiation of multiple logics, with implication for improvement science. The findings align with previous research suggesting that sustainable improvement involves the interplay of generalizable and contextual knowledge, and that paradoxes in organizational life shape conditions for learning and improvement.ConclusionQuality in child welfare is not a fixed attribute but a negotiated phenomenon, shaped by persistent tensions between uniformity and responsiveness. Recognizing these paradoxes invites reflection on how improvement science engages with quality in complex human service systems, particularly in relation to the interplay between codified standards and professional judgment.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1791049</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1791049</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Assessment of knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding diabetes among patients with type 2 diabetes in Hunan province, China: a cross-sectional study]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-03-24T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Guiyan Chen</author><author>Ning Gao</author><author>Jianwei Huang</author><author>Linhua Pi</author>
        <description><![CDATA[BackgroundType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has become a public health crisis in China, particularly in rural areas, leading to significant impairment of quality of life and premature death. However, little is known about the level of knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) required for diabetic patients for effective management and prevention of complications. This study aimed to assess the KAP level of patients with T2DM and identify the associated factors in Central China.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted using self-administered KAP questionnaires among patients with T2DM recruited from 12 township health centers. KAP levels were determined by calculating the scores, and the association between respondents' characteristics and KAP outcomes was evaluated using chi-square tests and Mann–Whitney U-tests, as appropriate.ResultsIn total, 259 diabetic patients completed the survey. Overall, despite adequate knowledge and positive attitudes toward T2DM, there were substantial gaps in practices. The respondents scored 13.09 out of 17points on the knowledge subscales, 3.88 out of 4 on the attitude subscales, and 4.96 out of 12 on the practice subscales. Educational attainment, health insurance type, diabetic complications, and current medical treatment pattern were significant predictors of knowledge. Educational attainment, health insurance type, diabetic complications, and comorbidities were significant predictors of attitudes. Educational attainment and marital status affected respondents' practices significantly.ConclusionsDespite adequate knowledge and positive attitudes toward T2DM, there were substantial gaps in diabetic practices. These findings highlight the urgent need for action from relevant health authorities and policymakers to improve diabetic practices among Chinese patients with T2DM in rural China.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1797149</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1797149</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Characterization of collaborative management paths for public health at the county-level government in China: 3 cases based on fsQCA]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-03-19T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Brief Research Report</category>
        <author>Jiangping Fu</author><author>Rui Hu</author><author>Bing Cao</author><author>Zhi Sun</author>
        <description><![CDATA[BackgroundCounty-level governments (CLG) are the basic organizational units of China's administrative power. The collaborative management paths (CMP) for public health at the CLG carry a variety of pressures and are responsible for coordinating the allocation of resources, and need to be well developed in terms of their capacity structure.MethodThis study defines the CMP of CLG in public health as six variables of policy resource: configuration capability, perception capability, insight capability, integration capability, learning capability, and innovation capability. This study incorporates the fsQCA algorithm to explore the non-linear relationship between the collaborative management capabilities of the CMP of CLG in public health and policy resources.ResultsA configuration of the CMP of CLG for public health was identified (solution coverage 36.67%, solution consistency 98.24%). The CLG's CMP has full-time-phase characteristics, i.e., the diversion management time-phase is characterized by conventional and non-conventional management time-phase groupings, but the non-conventional management time-phase does not have a bottleneck level. CLG's CMP has 3 core elements (Integration, Learning, and Perception Capabilities) and 2 supporting elements (Innovation and Insight Capabilities). The bottleneck level analysis of CLG's CMP resulted in a 10% level of perceived capacity being required to achieve a 60% level of configured capacity. The sensitivity test of the CMP for CLG suggests that the pathway is robust.ConclusionThis study presents a framework for observing/interpreting the results of CLG as a managerial behavior (policy resource management) at the grassroots level of government from the perspective of CMP.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1733685</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1733685</link>
        <title><![CDATA[The FrEEIA readiness assessment tool: an evidence-informed pro-equity readiness assessment tool adapted in Aotearoa New Zealand for the implementation of health interventions]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-03-19T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Nina Veenstra</author><author>Papillon Gustafson</author><author>Michelle Lambert</author><author>Lisa Kremer</author><author>Holly O'Loughlin</author><author>Karen Bartholomew</author><author>Peter Carswell</author><author>Mihi Ratima</author><author>Adam Fusheini</author><author>Patricia Priest</author><author>Sue Crengle</author>
        <description><![CDATA[IntroductionEquitable implementation is an important dimension of effective implementation. In Aotearoa New Zealand, many health interventions with the potential to lessen health inequities for Māori fail to do so because of implementation challenges. Equity readiness can ensure organisations are both willing and able to implement or scale up health interventions in a way that doesn't result in further health disparities.MethodsAn equity readiness assessment tool, designed to be used by healthcare organisations in conjunction with an equity focussed process framwork (FrEEIA: Framework for Effective and Equitable Implementation in Aotearoa), was developed through a seven stage, mixed methods, iterative process. This tool frames equity readiness as a collective, multi-level construct. Initial stages of its development included interviews with interest holders to explore barriers and facilitators impacting the implementation of interventions to improve health equity, a reveiw of existing equity assessment and change readiness tools, and a researcher workshop to develop key domains. This was followed by the actual development/adaptation of a suitable tool with advice from interest holders who had utilised similar tools, testing and the development of additional resources that would aid its use.Results and discussionThe final version of the FrEEIA Readiness Assessment Tool is an adapted version of The Readiness Thinking Tool®, comprising 31 statements in three sections (individual readiness, intervention-specific readiness, and organisational readiness) which users rate individually and then discuss as a team, before formulating an action plan to improve equity readiness. Pilot testing highlighted the particular benefit of the tool in increasing awareness of the different dimensions of equity readiness, with the identification of strategies to address barriers to readiness more challenging due primarily to timing, team make up, and facilitation challenges. A range of supporting resources -a User Guide, Facilitator's Guide and Action Plan template- were developed to facilitate action plan development.The FrEEIA Readiness Assessment Tool is now available for use and adaptation through an interactive online interface, a format which was found to carry distinct advantages for tailoring feedback. The research team will continue to make refinements as this tool gets rolled out in a wider variety of service settings.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1723215</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1723215</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Integrating evidence-based paediatric asthma management in Australian primary care: phase I protocol for developing implementation bundles]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-03-11T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Study Protocol</category>
        <author>Ashraful Kabir</author><author>Md Ariful Islam</author><author>Shirdhya Joypaul</author><author>Duha Gide</author><author>Gaston Arnolda</author><author>Yvonne Zurynski</author><author>Georgia Fisher</author><author>Charlotte Kelly</author><author>Yvonne Mullins</author><author>Bronwyn Gould</author><author>Anthony Flynn</author><author>Sinead Burke</author><author>Ai-Vee Chua</author><author>Charlotte Dealhoy</author><author>Christina Rojas</author><author>Jeffrey Braithwaite</author><author>Adam Jaffe</author><author>Nusrat Homaira</author>
        <description><![CDATA[IntroductionAsthma is the most common chronic respiratory condition among Australian children. However, adherence to clinical guidelines for paediatric asthma care in general practice (GP) settings requires attention—it is estimated to be below 60% in some contexts. The National Paediatric Applied Research Translation Initiative (N-PARTI) is a three-phased, co-designed research program aiming to optimise guideline-concordant paediatric care across three priority conditions, including asthma, Type 1 Diabetes (T1D), and antibiotic stewardship in Australian general practices. This protocol outlines Phase I of the N-PARTI asthma stream, focusing on developing an Implementation Bundle to support evidence-based asthma management in general practices.Methods and analysisUsing a mixed-method design, Phase I will employ a multi-method, co-design approach comprising three Aims: (i) to verify and refine a multicomponent asthma Implementation Bundle tailored for general practice through evidence synthesis, and co-design workshops, involving children with asthma and their parents and carers, alongside with key stakeholders; (ii) to map asthma-related clinical workflows across diverse general practice settings through interviews and observations, analysed using the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) to capture variations in routine practice; and (iii) to explore contextual factors within Primary Health Networks (PHNs) through stakeholder interviews, informing the development of locally tailored implementation strategies. Qualitative data will be analysed using a reflexive thematic analysis approach informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Outputs will include a refined, contextually adapted paediatric asthma Implementation Bundle and resources to support real-world simulation, testing and tailoring (Phase II), as well as the scale-up, embedding and evaluation of the implementation (Phase III).Ethics and disseminationThis research project has been approved by the Macquarie University Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference No. 520251855660911). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences, stakeholder forums, and policy briefings. Co-designed outputs will also be shared with participating PHNs to inform wider implementation and scale-up efforts.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1776038</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1776038</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Evaluating the perceived implementation and impact of the chronic dispensing unit in the Western Cape]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-03-09T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Original Research</category>
        <author>Ilona Matthew</author><author>Michelle Viljoen</author><author>Jane McCartney</author><author>Angeni Bheekie</author>
        <description><![CDATA[IntroductionThe research explores the perceived implementation and impact of the Chronic Dispensing Unit (CDU) within a South African primary healthcare system, with a focus on chronic disease management, using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) and CFIR (Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research) frameworks. Equitable access to healthcare and medicine is still a challenge; it demands long-term care and ongoing medical interventions. Introduced in 2005, the CDU in the Western Cape was designed to overcome the challenges in access by centralising dispensing and distribution of chronic medicines. Two decades after its implementation, its contribution is underexplored. This research evaluated the long-term performance and sustainability of the CDU using implementation frameworks.MethodA qualitative design was used, using virtual semi-structured interviews with purposively selected participants (n = 8) involved in the implementation and maintenance of the CDU. Interviews were analysed thematically. A deductive-inductive strategy was applied, guided by the RE-AIM and CFIR frameworks.ResultsThe CDU demonstrated substantial Reach and Effectiveness. It has refined operational processes and reduced patient waiting times. Challenges with data integration and the non-collection of medicine limit the CDU’s ability to inform clinical outcomes and long-term sustainability.ConclusionsThe CDU is still an effective, well-integrated system that supports chronic disease management but is constrained by disconnected data systems. This study evaluated a large-scale health intervention that facilitated data-driven decision-making to monitor, evaluate, and report on evidence-based programmes addressing barriers to sustainment. Integrating two frameworks provided an assessment of a patient-centred intervention, granting insights into equity in access to medicine, to strengthen primary healthcare systems.]]></description>
      </item><item>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1678257</guid>
        <link>https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frhs.2026.1678257</link>
        <title><![CDATA[Hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation studies: why and how to do them]]></title>
        <pubdate>2026-03-05T00:00:00Z</pubdate>
        <category>Methods</category>
        <author>Jure Baloh</author><author>Sara J. Landes</author><author>Jeffrey L. Smith</author><author>Geoffrey M. Curran</author>
        <description><![CDATA[Effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 1 studies primarily investigate the effectiveness of an intervention and have a secondary focus on exploring implementation-related factors. Integrating implementation aims into intervention effectiveness studies can improve the speed, quantity, and quality of intervention implementation, sustainment, and scale in routine practice, and thereby maximize the impact on population health. This article provides guidance for designing and conducting the implementation aims of effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 1 studies, summarizing past thinking and advancing new considerations for these approaches. The authors argue that hybrid type 1 approaches are suitable for most types of intervention effectiveness research (e.g., efficacy trials, comparative-effectiveness research, observational studies), for different kinds of interventions (e.g., treatment, screening, prevention), and in a broad range of settings (e.g., healthcare, public health, community, schools). The article offers methodological guidance for designing the implementation aims of hybrid type 1 studies, structured around three goals: (1) explain intervention implementation in the effectiveness trial, (2) explore stakeholder perceptions to inform future implementation research, and (3) examine stakeholder perceptions to inform the effectiveness trial. Each of these goals offers a distinct set of research questions and design considerations (e.g., timing, sampling, data collection). Finally, the authors provide some tools and resources for planning and designing hybrid type 1 studies.]]></description>
      </item>
      </channel>
    </rss>