<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="correction">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Hum. Dyn.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Human Dynamics</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Hum. Dyn.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2673-2726</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fhumd.2021.675145</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Human Dynamics</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Correction</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Corrigendum: Browsing Different Instagram Profiles and Associations With Psychological Well-Being</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Burnell</surname> <given-names>Kaitlyn</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1037347/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>George</surname> <given-names>Madeleine J.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1082480/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Underwood</surname> <given-names>Marion K.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1081402/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University</institution>, <addr-line>Durham, NC</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Purdue University</institution>, <addr-line>West Lafayette, IN</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>College of Health and Human Sciences, Purdue University</institution>, <addr-line>West Lafayette, IN</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited and reviewed by: Yalda Uhls, University of California, Los Angeles, United States</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x0002A;Correspondence: Kaitlyn Burnell <email>kaitlyn.burnell&#x00040;duke.edu</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn001"><p>This article was submitted to Digital Impacts, a section of the journal Frontiers in Human Dynamics</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>08</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>3</volume>
<elocation-id>675145</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>02</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>10</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2021 Burnell, George and Underwood.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Burnell, George and Underwood</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<related-article id="RA1" related-article-type="corrected-article" journal-id="Front. Hum. Dyn." journal-id-type="nlm-ta" vol="2" page="585518" xlink:href="10.3389/fhumd.2020.585518" ext-link-type="doi">A Corrigendum on <article-title>Browsing Different Instagram Profiles and Associations With Psychological Well-Being</article-title> by Burnell, K., George, M. J., and Underwood, M. K. (2020). Front. Hum. Dyn. 2:585518. doi: <object-id>10.3389/fhumd.2020.585518</object-id></related-article> <kwd-group>
<kwd>Instagram</kwd>
<kwd>social media</kwd>
<kwd>feedback seeking</kwd>
<kwd>fear of missing out</kwd>
<kwd>well-being</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="0"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="0"/>
<page-count count="2"/>
<word-count count="668"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<p>In the original article, there was an error. The regression mean square values were incorrectly labeled as the mean square error values.</p>
<p>A correction has been made to the &#x0201C;Effects of Condition on Post-browsing Reports&#x0201D; section.</p>
<p>To examine how post-browsing reports of affect and self-perceptions differed between conditions, a series of ANCOVAs were run (Figure 1). All analyses were run controlling for the corresponding pre-browsing assessment of each variable; marginal means are reported in-text and in Figure 1. Post-browsing self-esteem significantly differed by condition, <italic>F</italic><sub>(2,399)</sub> = 22.60, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001, <italic>MSE</italic> = 0.85, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x003B7;</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> = 0.10. Participants in the self condition reported higher self-esteem (<italic>M</italic> = 5.88, <italic>SE</italic> = 0.08) than those in the acquaintance (<italic>M</italic> = 5.30, <italic>SE</italic> = 0.08) and influencer (<italic>M</italic> = 5.17, <italic>SE</italic> = 0.08) conditions; the acquaintance and influencer conditions did not differ from each other (<italic>p</italic> = 0.277). Post-browsing positive affect significantly differed by condition, <italic>F</italic><sub>(2,400)</sub> = 8.19, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001, <italic>MSE</italic> = 0.90, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x003B7;</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> = 0.04. Participants in the self condition reported higher positive affect (<italic>M</italic> = 4.49, <italic>SE</italic> = 0.08) than those in the acquaintance (<italic>M</italic> = 4.17, <italic>SE</italic> = 0.08) and influencer (<italic>M</italic> = 4.04, <italic>SE</italic> = 0.08) conditions; the acquaintance and influencer conditions did not differ from each other (<italic>p</italic> = 0.263). Post-browsing negative affect did not significantly differ by condition, <italic>F</italic><sub>(2,400)</sub> = 0.53, <italic>p</italic> = 0.588, <italic>MSE</italic> = 0.38, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x003B7;</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> = 0.00. Post-browsing interpersonal negativity significantly differed by condition, <italic>F</italic><sub>(2,320)</sub> = 28.65, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001, <italic>MSE</italic> = 1.33, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x003B7;</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> = 0.15. Participants in the self condition (<italic>M</italic> = 1.32, <italic>SE</italic> = 0.11) reported lower interpersonal negativity than those in the acquaintance (<italic>M</italic> = 2.14, <italic>SE</italic> = 0.11) and influencer (<italic>M</italic> = 2.46, <italic>SE</italic> = 0.11) conditions; the acquaintance and influencer conditions also significantly differed from each other (<italic>p</italic> = 0.045). Post-browsing positive self-perceptions significantly differed by condition, <italic>F</italic><sub>(2,400)</sub> = 23.42, <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.001, <italic>MSE</italic> = 0.56, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x003B7;</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula> = 0.11. Participants in the self condition reported greater positive self-perceptions (<italic>M</italic> = 4.72, <italic>SE</italic> = 0.06) than those in the acquaintance (<italic>M</italic> = 4.20, <italic>SE</italic> = 0.06) and influencer (<italic>M</italic> = 4.15, <italic>SE</italic> = 0.07) conditions; the acquaintance and influencer conditions did not significantly differ from each other (<italic>p</italic> = 0.616).</p>
<p>The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.</p>
</body>
</article>