Abstract
A neurogenic dysphagia is dysphagia caused by problems with the central and peripheral nervous systems, is particularly prevalent in conditions such as Parkinson’s disease and stroke. It significantly impacts the quality of life for affected individuals and causes additional burdens, such as malnutrition, aspiration pneumonia, asphyxia, or even death from choking due to improper eating. Physical therapy offers a non-invasive treatment with high efficacy and low cost. Evidence supporting the use of physical therapy in dysphagia treatment is increasing, including techniques such as neuromuscular electrical stimulation, sensory stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. While initial studies have shown promising results, the effectiveness of specific treatment regimens still requires further validation. At present, there is a lack of scientific evidence to guide patient selection, develop appropriate treatment regimens, and accurately evaluate treatment outcomes. Therefore, the primary objectives of this review are to review the results of existing research, summarize the application of physical therapy in dysphagia management, we also discussed the mechanisms and treatments of physical therapy for neurogenic dysphagia.
1 Introduction
There are several complex physiological movements involved in swallowing, including movements of the mouth, pharynx, larynx, and esophagus (Shaw and Martino, 2013). Dysphagia refers to the disruption of the normal swallowing process (Rofes et al., 2011), which poses severe risks including malnutrition, aspiration pneumonia, asphyxia, etc (). The causes of dysphagia can be divided into neurogenic, structural, and mental dysphagia (Medicine DRCO, 2023). A neurogenic dysphagia results from problems with the central and peripheral nervous systems (). The number of people suffering from neurogenic dysphagia each year worldwide is estimated at 400000 to 800,000 (Panebianco et al., 2020). Among the diseases that predispose to neurogenic dysphagia are stroke, Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, and other forms of neurodegeneration (). It is a common complication of stroke to experience dysphagia afterward, it is estimated that 20–43% of patients have persistent dysphagia after 3 months, which can lead to aspiration pneumonia, malnutrition, water and electrolyte disorders, and other complications (). There is a prevalence of 18–100% of Parkinson’s disease with dysphagia, it can lead to dehydration, malnutrition, aspiration pneumonia, depression, and social isolation, and it can also affect the quality of life and even cause death (). Dehydration, malnutrition, asphyxia, and death are all risks associated with neurogenic dysphagia, which severely reduces the quality of life for the patient (Xia et al., 2023; Kocica et al., 2024).
Physical therapy, as a new treatment method, directly targets the swallowing nerve circuit to enhance swallowing function (Li et al., 2023). Common clinical treatments for dysphagia include neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), sensory stimulation, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (; Miller et al., 2022; Li et al., 2023). However, there remains paucity of discourse on the application of physical therapy in dysphagia management in different diseases. The purpose of this review article is to provide more theoretical support for the application of physical therapy in neurogenic dysphagia, and to describe treatment principles and treatment programs of several commonly used physical therapy programs.
2 Mechanisms associated with dysphagia
Swallowing is a complex process, it involves the coordination of more than 30 muscles in the mouth, pharynx, larynx, and esophagus, encompassing four distinct stages: oral preparation, oral transit, pharynx, and esophageal phase (). It involves various levels of the central nervous system, from the cortex to the medulla, as well as multiple cranial and peripheral nerves (). It is well recognized that pharyngeal movements are strongly related to the innervation of sensory branches of the cranial nerves (Nascimento et al., 2021). Usually, swallowing is controlled by four types of components: (1) afferent motor fibers in cranial nerves and ansa cervicalis; (2) afferent sensory fibers in cranial nerves; (3) fibers lining the cerebral, cerebellar, and cerebellar hemispheres that synapse in the swallowing centers; (4) paired swallowing centers in the brainstem that synapse with each other (). In the swallowing process, fiber transmitters transmit signals from peripheral nerves and the cerebral cortex to the swallowing centers in the brain stem (). There is a complex unit called the swallowing central pattern generator that is composed of motor neurons and interneurons located in the brainstem’s medulla oblongata, a region that contains swallowing neurons (Sasegbon et al., 2024). Two parts make up the pattern generator of the swallowing center: (1) the dorsal region consisting of the nucleus tractus solitarius and peripheral neurons; (2) the nucleus and reticular formation surrounding the nucleus are located in the ventral region (). Nucleus ambiguous innervates the muscles of the oral cavity, larynx, and pharynx through the trigeminal, facial, glossopharyngeal, vagus, and accessory nerves (Petko and Tadi, 2023; ), The nucleus tractus solitary can receive incoming information from the nucleus doubtful and then send efferent fibers to the corresponding muscles, but mainly integrates information from higher cortical centers and peripheral sensory afferents and regulates swallowing according to the nature of the food bolus (; Ye et al., 2024). Overall (see Figure 1), the swallowing central pattern generator is responsible for the formation and regulation of swallowing motor sequences, processing incoming information, generating preprogrammed swallowing responses, and distributing appropriate signals to the motor nuclei of cranial nerves and their axons, which are ultimately transmitted to the many muscles involved in swallowing (Yamamoto et al., 2022).
Figure 1
A trigeminal and facial nerve innervate the muscles of the mouth, masticatory muscles are innervated by the trigeminal nerve, while the glossopharyngeal nerve and the vagus nerve innervate the muscles of the pharynx (). In addition, the contraction of the esophageal sphincter affects the operation of swallowing, it contains the cricopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal constrictors and is innervated by the vagus nerve, while the muscularis that promote the contraction of the esophageal sphincter during swallowing, such as the suprahyoid muscles (stylohyoid, digastric, and mylohyoid muscles) and thyrohyoid muscles, are innervated by the trigeminal, facial, and hypoglossal nerves (McCarty and Chao, 2021). The recruitment of muscles necessary for the swallowing sequence is directed by the swallowing network, and integration between descending signals and afferent inputs may occur in the cortex and cerebellum, where there are multiple synaptic connections for different functions, the cerebral cortex may be responsible for the initiation of motor commands, and some cortical areas may be responsible for the integration of chewing and swallowing information, other regions, however, feed the descending signal back to the brain stem with the sensation of the bolus moving along the swallowing channel (). Although movement is directed by the cortex, the cerebellum is also associated with movement and plays a key role in the balanced coordination of muscle movements (Roostaei et al., 2014). Influences the cortical swallowing module consisting of primary motor, auxiliary motor, primary sensory cortical areas, and cingulate gyrus (Sasegbon and Hamdy, 2023).
The term “neurogenic dysphagia” refers to dysphagia, or dysfunction of swallowing mechanisms, in patients who have suffered a neurologic insult or disease (Teismann et al., 2007). Such diseases include stroke, Parkinson’s disease, and multiple sclerosis, among other neurodegenerative disease processes (). Dysphagia following stroke primarily stems from cerebral cortex and subcortical structures damage, affecting areas like the motor cortex, cerebellum, thalamus, and other parts, as well as sensory defects of the pharyngeal mucosa (Teismann et al., 2007; Qin et al., 2023). It is characterized by a delayed or absent swallowing reflex and a premature overflow of bolus (Labeit et al., 2023), pharyngeal food residues and pharyngeal motility disorders (Warnecke et al., 2021). A dysphagia caused by Parkinson’s disease is different from dysphagia caused by stroke because it is primarily caused by problems with the brainstem, muscle atrophy, and dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic mechanisms (Patel et al., 2020). The patient presented with hypoesthesia of the pharynx, food residue, and bradykinesia of the oropharynx (Labeit et al., 2020a), the swallowing reflex was impaired, and the bolus overflowed prematurely (Labeit et al., 2020b). The pathological mechanisms of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis include damage of cortical bulbar fibers alone or in combination, damage of the brainstem swallowing center, abnormalities of the cerebellum affecting the accuracy of sequential planning and coordination of swallowing, failure of the afferent nerve central sensory pathway and abnormal impairment of the central motor pathway (). Its dysfunction may occur at any stage of swallowing and cause various complications such as aspiration pneumonia, malnutrition and airway obstruction ().
3 Physical therapy
3.1 Neuromuscular electrical stimulation
The purpose of NMES is to stimulate peripheral nerves associated with paralyzed pharyngeal muscles with low-frequency electrical stimulation, aiming to enhance their functionality (). In simpler terms, the effects of NMES on swallowing are improved through the contraction of pharyngeal muscles (). Laryngeal elevation and reduction resulting from pharyngeal muscle defects are the primary causes of dysphagia in stroke patients, leading to potential issues such as aspiration and pharyngeal residue (). Therefore, the NMES therapy is considered one of the most effective treatments for dysphagia caused by stroke (). Moreover, patients with Parkinson’s disease often use NMES as a form of physical therapy to improve tongue muscle weakness (Park et al., 2018).
Preliminary studies indicated that increased tongue power results in greater activation of the suprahyoid muscle during swallowing (Oh, 2016). This goal can be achieved by NMES, by depolarizing motor axons and activation of type II fast-twitch muscle fibers in neuromuscular tissues, either through peripheral nerves or muscle belly (; ). In patients with brain injury-related dysphagia, the NMES strengthens both suprahyoid and infrahyoid muscles, along with the muscles that assist in swallowing (Seo et al., 2021). Moreover, the long-term application of NMES benefits the recovery of swallowing-related cortical neuroplasticity in stroke patients (Zhang et al., 2022). Given the loss of swallowing motor control in stroke patients, functional muscle contraction patterns are primarily re-educated during NMES (Miller et al., 2022). This entails triggering the peripheral neuromuscular system via external electrical stimulus, depolarizing cervical muscle nerve fibers, and initiating oropharyngeal muscle contraction to improve swallowing function (Wang et al., 2023). In addition, it shows promise in improving dysphagia associated with other diseases such as Parkinson’s disease and head and neck cancer, in similar ways to how NMES improves dysphagia associated with strokes, it stimulates the nerve and motor endplates of the nerve (Tan et al., 2013).
In the application of NMES, electrodes are typically positioned on the hyoid muscles or adjacent areas, utilizing a frequency range of 25 to 120 Hz (Miller et al., 2022). Recent research findings, as summarized in Table S1, suggest the optimal treatment duration for NMES is generally between 20 to 30 min, with an application frequency of 80 Hz, and electrodes placed on the hyoid muscles (Miller et al., 2022). At present, studies consistently demonstrate that NMES improves swallowing function in patients suffering from neurogenic dysphagia, attributed to the following factors: (1) stimulation of the tongue, orbicular oris muscles, and other related muscles to promote the development of normal movement patterns and enhance organ and muscle functions; (2) alteration in the excitability of the pharyngeal cortex to promote normal swallowing mode operation; (3) activation of the swallowing center, facilitating the functional reconstruction of the nervous system (Konecny and Elfmark, 2018; Meng et al., 2018; Zeng et al., 2018; Oh et al., 2020).
In summary (see Figure 2), the NMES stimulates the depolarization of the axons below the electrode, and the depolarization signal of motor axons propagates from the stimulation site to the muscle (peripheral pathway) to produce contraction, which can induce the neural plasticity of the central nervous system and enhance the neuromuscular function after nervous system injury (). A NMES consists of muscle reeducation primarily focused on improving swallowing function by facilitating normal swallowing mode operation ().
Figure 2
3.2 Sensory stimulation
Sensory stimulation plays a crucial role in promoting the rehabilitation of swallowing function (). Normal swallowing relies on somatosensory inputs associated with trigeminal, glossopharyngeal, and vagus nerves (). When the sensory information pathway is impaired, reduced sensory input can slow down the swallowing-cortical pathway, resulting in dysphagia (Teismann et al., 2007). Sensory stimulation of the cranial nerves enhances the transmission of information to the solitary tract nucleus in the brainstem (). This, in turn, increases the sensory input to the nucleus tract solitary in the brainstem through cranial nerves, promoting the operation of normal swallowing pattern, and ultimately improving swallowing function (). Common sensory stimulation methods include ice, acid, and carbonation stimulation (Regan, 2020).
Ice stimulation therapy uses repetitive mechanical, pressure, and temperature stimulation to enhance the sensitivity of the soft palate and pharynx. By increasing the sensory sensitivity of local nerves, ice stimulation prompts local muscles contraction and triggers the swallowing reflex (Li et al., 2017). Consequently, ice stimulation mobilizes resting neuron excitability, reconstructs the neural network to achieve functional reorganization, promotes the normal swallowing reflex, and restores the function of swallowing organs (). In the application of ice stimulation therapy Nakamura and Fujishima (2013) dipped a cotton stick about 10 cm long and 1.27 cm in diameter into the water until it froze into a frozen sucker, then lightly rubbed and pressed it against the posterior tongue, bottom of the tongue, and posterior pharyngeal wall of stroke patients with dysphagia for 10 s, results revealed that ice stick massage could shorten the threshold of the swallowing response phase. demonstrated that placing an ice stick in the mouth is superior to placing it on the neck. Intraoral ice stimulation significantly can increase the excitability of the swallowing pathway in the cortex, trigger swallowing initiation, and shorten the duration of the pharyngeal phase. Early rehabilitation of stroke patients with dysphagia is closely related to the central nervous system’s ability to compensate and reconstruct injured areas, thereby increasing the excitability of the nervous system and facilitating swallowing by activating the central nervous system to form new sensory and motor projections (Qin et al., 2019). At this point, when applied to stroke-related dysphagia, ice stimulation’s effects primarily manifest in two ways. Firstly, it activates sensory nerve fibers, boosts sensory recovery, and restores the neural network (). Secondly, it enhances sensory sensitivity. By increasing the sensitivity of the swallowing reflex area, it amplifies sensory inputs before swallowing, induces the generation of swallowing reflex, and finally improves swallowing function ().
The improvement of dysphagia through acid stimulation may be attributed to sensory feedback information (Logemann et al., 1995). Previous studies investigating neurogenic swallowing dysfunction found that subjects consuming water with a citric acid concentration of 2.7%, compared to plain water, exhibited increased spontaneous swallowing and reduced aspirations, leading to an improvement in swallowing function (Pelletier and Lawless, 2003). Wang et al. (2022) reported an effective acid stimulation medium for treating dysphagia in stroke patients. This method entailed applying vitamin C tablet powder (0.2 g/day) to the patient’s bilateral tongue using a cotton swab, followed by swallowing practice instructions. Additionally, tongue massage with the cotton swab and guidance for tongue and masticatory muscle exercises were included (5–6 times per day, 15 min each time for 2 weeks). Acid stimulation promotes saliva secretion by stimulating the tongue, thereby accelerating the swallowing process and relieving swallowing disorders (Wang et al., 2022). Acid stimulation effectively improves stroke dysphagia based on two fundamental principles. Furthermore, acid stimulation increases the activity intensity of swallowing-related muscles such as the mylohyoid and front belly of the digastric muscles, triggering stronger contractions during swallowing and consequently improving dysphagia (Palmer et al., 2005).
Carbonation stimulation is also considered to be a beneficial sensory stimulation technique for improving dysphagia, primarily by enhancing the contractility of the velum and oropharynx (Omari et al., 2020) as well as prolonging the opening duration of the upper esophageal sphincter (Miura et al., 2009). A recent study conducted by Morishita et al. (2023) has suggested that carbonation may induce changes in brain excitability, resulting in shorter swallowing times in healthy individuals consuming carbonated beverages. Additionally demonstrated that carbonation stimulation effectively reduces airway aspiration and pharyngeal retention, and shortens the duration of the pharyngeal phase duration. Sdravou et al. (2012) conducted an experiment involving carbonation stimulation in 17 patients with neurogenic dysphagia, confirming that drinking carbonated water can reduce aspiration. The effectiveness of carbonation in improving swallowing function can be attributed to two main factors. On the one hand, it is related to the activation of swallowing pathways. Stimulation of peripheral sensory receptors and sensory fibers in the nucleus tractus solitarius in the brainstem activates the pattern generator of the swallowing center (Nagano et al., 2022). On the other hand, carbonation affects numerous receptors in the larynx, namely mechanoreceptors, chemoreceptors, pain receptors, and thermoreceptors, which respond to carbonation stimulation by triggering protective reflexes to prevent aspiration ().
In summary (see Figure 2), the intensity and duration of the swallowing response can be triggered or regulated by a complex biofeedback mechanism, sensory stimulation transmit signals mainly through the trigeminal, facial, glossopharyngeal and vagus nerves, which on the one hand directly reach the swallowing central pattern generator, and on the other hand, transmit signals to the cerebral cortex, which outputs information to the swallowing central pattern generator for integration and tissue, the swallowing response is facilitated ().
3.3 Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
The technique of rTMS involves placing a coil to the head to generate a magnetic field when an electric current passes through it, this magnetic field induces current flows within brain tissue perpendicular to its direction, which are of strong strength to induce modifications in both cortical and subcortical white matter axons (Ridding and Rothwell, 2007). The rTMS can either suppress or excite neuronal activity depending on the frequency used: frequencies at or below 1 Hz suppress neuronal activity, while those above 5 Hz elicit neuronal excitation (). Studies on healthy participants have investigated the effects of rTMS on the pharyngeal motor cortex (Yamamura et al., 2018). Findings indicate that rTMS at 1 Hz inhibits the excitability of the pharyngeal motor cortex, whereas high-frequency stimulation, such as 10 Hz stimulation of the cerebellar hemisphere increases the amplitude of pharynx cortical motor evoked potentials (Vasant et al., 2015; Sasegbon et al., 2020b). Due to its potential neural repair mechanisms, dysphagia has been treated extensively with rTMS (Sasegbon et al., 2020a). Recent schemes for rTMS treatment of dysphagia are summarized in Table S2. According to Table S2, treatment with rTMS focuses primarily on the cerebellum and pharyngeal motor cortex. High frequencies are predominantly used for treatment frequency, and the treatment time is mostly selected daily, 5 days a week, for a total of 2 weeks, and the swallowing function test results are improved (; Rao et al., 2022; Zhong et al., 2023).
There is evidence that rTMS alters cortical excitability, regulates neurotransmitter release, and promotes neuroplasticity in the brain (). The increase in cortical activity in the cerebral hemispheres is associated with functional recovery in stroke patients with dysphagia, and the reorganization of neural networks plays a significant role in the recovery of swallowing function (). The changes in neuroplasticity are closely related to rTMS induced synaptic connections in the process of regulating the functional state of the cerebral cortex (Li et al., 2022). There is no single target for rTMS treatment of stroke dysphagia; rather, it involves the regeneration of swallowing function in stroke patients through the cooperative action of multiple brain areas (). After virtual lesion simulation in stroke patients with dysphagia, cerebellar high frequency rTMS not only improves the excitability of the pharyngeal motor cortex in healthy volunteers (Sasegbon et al., 2019, 2020b) but also improves swallowing function among stroke patients with dysphagia (Zhong et al., 2023). This may be explained by the fact that the cerebellum is connected to the brainstem by three cerebellar peduncles, which directly communicate with the various motor nuclei of the brainstem (Roostaei et al., 2014). Based on the evidence that rTMS could improve not only swallowing disorder but also motor function, Khedr et al. applied rTMS to Parkinson’s disease patients with dysphagia and achieved the envisaged results: Parkinson’s disease patients could benefit from rTMS for dysphagia (Khedr et al., 2019).
In summary (see Figure 2), the cerebral cortex and cerebellum are the primary stimulation targets for rTMS in dysphagia, it uses electromagnetic induction to depolarization synapses and accelerate the operation of swallowing circuit through changes in neuroplasticity, so as to improve swallowing function (Speyer et al., 2022; Labeit et al., 2024).
3.4 Transcranial direct current stimulation
The tDCS technique is a groundbreaking method of non-invasive brain stimulation (Pisegna et al., 2016) that involves applying small electrical currents (1–2 mA) through two surface electrodes, the anode electrode and cathode electrode, to targeted brain regions, thereby triggering and modulating brain activity (). In recent years, there has been strong interest in tDCS as an effective, noninvasive method to treat dysphagia (). Table S3 shows the application of tDCS in dysphagia treatment in recent years. It can be seen from the table that tDCS is mostly used for stroke-related dysphagia. The location of the anode is related to the area involved in the pharyngeal motor cortex. The cathodes are mostly placed in the contralateral supraorbital region and the opposite shoulder, most single intervention sessions last 20 min, the treatment effect can generally achieve the improvement of swallowing function (; ).
Neuroplasticity is the concept behind tDCS, which is a form of noninvasive brain stimulation (). The swallowing motor task-related activities of the brain are enhanced through glutamatergic and calcium-dependent processes, including synaptogenesis, reorganization, strengthening, and inhibition of brain networks (Pisegna et al., 2016; Tedesco Triccas et al., 2016). Anodal tDCS can improve swallowing function by stimulating the pharyngeal motor cortex in patients with Parkinson’s disease, which is associated with an increase in the strength of synaptic connections related to deglutition in the cerebral cortex (Tedesco Triccas et al., 2016). Dysphagia can also be ameliorated by tDCS in older adults with and without neurological conditions, which is associated with the induction of a polar-dependent shift in underlying cortical excitability, as well as a broad activation of pharyngeal motor cortex in both brain hemispheres (). Furthermore, stroke patients often choose tDCS as a treatment for dysphagia, with numerous therapeutic targets (), related to the regions involved in the swallowing network and the fact that tDCS promotes neuroplasticity (). For example, enhancing the excitability of the uninjured side of the swallowing cortex, the injured side of the swallowing cortex, the bilateral swallowing cortex, and the superior limbic gyrus can be beneficial for enhancing swallowing function (Wang et al., 2020; Mao et al., 2022; ). Dysphagia in stroke patients can be effectively improved by tDCS, and anodal stimulation of the right swallowing cortex in patients with multiple sclerosis dysphagia can also improve swallowing function, as anodal stimulation of the swallowing motor cortex of the right also activates an extensive network involving the contralateral hemisphere to compensate for the damage caused by focal brain injury ().
In general (see Figure 2), the treatment principle of tDCS can improve dysphagia in a variety of diseases (Lefaucheur, 2016). Its current directly stimulates the brain or cerebellum and changes the polarity of nerve cells, aiming to trigger and promote neuroplasticity and improve dysphagia (Speyer et al., 2022; Labeit et al., 2024).
4 Summary and prospect
Neurogenic dysphagia is currently managed with motor training, oral medications, and surgery (). Clinical evidence supports the use of movement training for mild-to-moderate dysphagia (Saconato et al., 2016), with strong recommendations from intermediate and high-level evidence sources (Medicine DRCO, 2023; Yang et al., 2023). Patients with severe dysphagia typically undergo medical or surgical interventions, especially at intermediate and advanced disease stages (). While conventional treatments may take longer to reach full efficacy, physical therapy has emerged as a non-invasive and practical approach to shorten treatment duration for dysphagia patients (; ). This review elucidates the physiological function of the swallowing system, the pathological mechanisms of neurogenic dysphagia, and the principles and application of physical therapy. Overall, physical therapy offers benefits to individuals with neurogenic dysphagia by enhancing swallowing recovery, improving treatment outcomes, and enhancing quality of life (; ).
Considering the increasing public interest in neurogenic dysphagia, it is crucial to also address its effects on individuals with schizophrenia. Future research should prioritize investigating the pathogenesis of dysphagia in schizophrenia, exploring the effectiveness of physical therapy interventions, and identifying the most suitable therapy targets for this specific population.
Statements
Author contributions
KL: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition, Supervision. CF: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Writing – original draft. ZX: Writing – review & editing. JZ: Writing – original draft. CZ: Investigation, Writing – original draft. RL: Investigation, Writing – original draft. CG: Supervision, Writing – review & editing. JW: Writing – original draft. CX: Writing – review & editing, Investigation. YZ: Writing – review & editing. WD: Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by Medical and Health Science and Technology Development Plan of Shandong Province (No. 202303090378); Key Research Plan of Jining City (No. 2023YXNS006).
Acknowledgments
We appreciate the help of the Home for Researchers website in drawing, writing, etc.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1404398/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AhnY.SohnH.ParkJ.AhnT.ShinY.ParkM.et al. (2017). Effect of bihemispheric anodal transcranial direct current stimulation for dysphagia in chronic stroke patients: a randomized clinical trial. J. Rehabil. Med.49, 30–35. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2170
2
AlfonsiE.BergamaschiR.CosentinoG.PonzioM.MontomoliC.RestivoD. A.et al. (2013). Electrophysiological patterns of oropharyngeal swallowing in multiple sclerosis. Clin. Neurophysiol.124, 1638–1645. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.03.003
3
Alvarez-BerdugoD.RofesL.CasamitjanaJ.PadrónA.QuerM.ClavéP. (2016). Oropharyngeal and laryngeal sensory innervation in the pathophysiology of swallowing disorders and sensory stimulation treatments. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.1380, 104–120. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13150
4
AnsariN. N.TarameshluM.GhelichiL. (2020). Dysphagia in multiple sclerosis patients: diagnostic and evaluation strategies. Degener. Neurol. Neuromuscul. Dis.10, 15–28. doi: 10.2147/DNND.S198659
5
BandaK. J.WuK.-C.JenH.-J.ChuH.PienL.-C.ChenR.et al. (2023). Comparative effectiveness of combined and single Neurostimulation and traditional dysphagia therapies for post-stroke dysphagia: a network Meta-analysis. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair37, 194–204. doi: 10.1177/15459683231166940
6
BathP. M.LeeH. S.EvertonL. F. (2018). Swallowing therapy for dysphagia in acute and subacute stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.2018:CD000323. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000323.pub3
7
BengisuS.DemirN.KrespiY. (2024). Effectiveness of conventional dysphagia therapy (CDT), neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in acute post-stroke dysphagia: a comparative evaluation. Dysphagia39, 77–91. doi: 10.1007/s00455-023-10595-w
8
BeomJ.KimS. J.HanT. R. (2011). Electrical stimulation of the suprahyoid muscles in brain-injured patients with dysphagia: a pilot study. Ann. Rehabil. Med.35, 322–327. doi: 10.5535/arm.2011.35.3.322
9
BergquistA. J.ClairJ. M.LagerquistO.MangC. S.OkumaY.CollinsD. F. (2011). Neuromuscular electrical stimulation: implications of the electrically evoked sensory volley. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.111, 2409–2426. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2087-9
10
BradleyR. M. (2000). Sensory receptors of the larynx. Am. J. Med.108, 47–50. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00339-3
11
BülowM.OlssonR.EkbergO. (2003). Videoradiographic analysis of how carbonated thin liquids and thickened liquids affect the physiology of swallowing in subjects with aspiration on thin liquids. Acta Radiol.44, 366–372. doi: 10.1080/j.1600-0455.2003.00100.x
12
CarnabyG.LaGorioL.SillimanS.CraryM. (2020). Exercise-based swallowing intervention (McNeill dysphagia therapy) with adjunctive NMES to treat dysphagia post-stroke: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. J. Oral Rehabil.47, 501–510. doi: 10.1111/joor.12928
13
CarsonR. G.BuickA. R. (2021). Neuromuscular electrical stimulation-promoted plasticity of the human brain. J. Physiol.599, 2375–2399. doi: 10.1113/JP278298
14
ChandranS. K.DoucetM. (2024). Neurogenic dysphagia. Otolaryngol. Clin. N. Am.2024:23. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2024.02.023
15
ChenQ.KanM.JiangX.LiuH.ZhangD.YuanL.et al. (2024). Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of different repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation modalities for post-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis protocol. BMJ Open14:e080289. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080289
16
ChengI.SasegbonA.HamdyS. (2021). Effects of Neurostimulation on Poststroke dysphagia: a synthesis of current evidence from randomized controlled trials. Neuromodulation24, 1388–1401. doi: 10.1111/ner.13327
17
ChengI.TakahashiK.MillerA.HamdyS. (2022). Cerebral control of swallowing: an update on neurobehavioral evidence. J. Neurol. Sci.442:120434. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2022.120434
18
ColaP.GattoA.da SilvaR.SpadottoA.RibeiroP.SchelpA.et al. (2012). Taste and temperature in swallowing transit time after stroke. Cerebrovasc. Dis. Extra2, 45–51. doi: 10.1159/000339888
19
CosentinoG.GarganoR.BonuraG.RealmutoS.ToccoE.RagoneseP.et al. (2018). Anodal tDCS of the swallowing motor cortex for treatment of dysphagia in multiple sclerosis: a pilot open-label study. Neurol. Sci.39, 1471–1473. doi: 10.1007/s10072-018-3443-x
20
CosentinoG.TassorelliC.PrunettiP.BertinoG.De IccoR.TodiscoM.et al. (2020). Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation and intermittent theta-burst stimulation improve deglutition and swallowing reproducibility in elderly patients with dysphagia. Neurogastroenterol. Motil.32:e13791. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13791
21
CostaM. M. B. (2018). NEURAL CONTROL OF SWALLOWING. Arq. Gastroenterol.55, 61–75. doi: 10.1590/S0004-2803.201800000-45
22
CotaocoC.UehaR.KoyamaM.SatoT.GotoT.KondoK. (2024). Swallowing improvement surgeries. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol.281, 2807–2817. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08452-z
23
CuiF.YinQ.WuC.ShenM.ZhangY.MaC.et al. (2020). Capsaicin combined with ice stimulation improves swallowing function in patients with dysphagia after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. J. Oral Rehabil.47, 1297–1303. doi: 10.1111/joor.13068
24
DashteleiA. A.NitscheM. A.SalehinejadM. A.HabibiA. H.BakhtyiariJ.KhatoonabadiA. R. (2024). Adjunctive transcranial direct current stimulation to improve swallowing functions in Parkinson's disease. EXCLI J.23, 95–107. doi: 10.17179/excli2023-6496
25
DoddsW.StewartE.LogemannJ. (1990). Physiology and radiology of the normal oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.154, 953–963. doi: 10.2214/ajr.154.5.2108569
26
DongL.PanX.WangY.BaiG.HanC.WangQ.et al. (2022). High-frequency cerebellar rTMS improves the swallowing function of patients with dysphagia after brainstem stroke. Neural Plast.2022, 6259693–6259699. doi: 10.1155/2022/6259693
27
DoucetB.LamA.GriffinL. (2012). Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for skeletal muscle function. Yale J. Biol.85, 201–215.
28
El HalabiM.ArwaniR.ParkmanH. (2023). Dysphagia in neurological disorders. Semin. Neurol.43, 530–539. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771458
29
El NahasN.ShokriH.RefaatA.MousaH.HamidA.Abdel MonemA.et al. (2024). The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation paired with neuromuscular electrical stimulation on swallowing function in post stroke dysphagia. Egypt. J. Neurol. Psychiatry Neurosurg.60:21. doi: 10.1186/s41983-023-00767-8
30
FarpourS.Asadi-ShekaariM.Borhani HaghighiA.FarpourH. (2023). Improving swallowing function and ability in post stroke dysphagia: a randomized clinical trial. Dysphagia38, 330–339. doi: 10.1007/s00455-022-10470-0
31
FerraraL.KamityR.IslamS.SherI.BarlevD.WennerholmL.et al. (2018). Short-term effects of cold liquids on the pharyngeal swallow in preterm infants with dysphagia: a pilot study. Dysphagia33, 593–601. doi: 10.1007/s00455-018-9877-8
32
FrostJ.RobinsonH. F.HibberdJ. (2018). A comparison of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and traditional therapy, versus traditional therapy in patients with longstanding dysphagia. Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.26, 167–173. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000454
33
Gómez-GarcíaN.Álvarez-BarrioL.Leirós-RodríguezR.Soto-RodríguezA.Andrade-GómezE.Hernández-LucasP. (2023). Transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke dysphagia: a meta-analysis. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil.20:165. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01290-w
34
HashimotoK.SugiyamaY.FuseS.UmezakiT.OkuY.DutschmannM.et al. (2019). Activity of swallowing-related neurons in the medulla in the perfused brainstem preparation in rats. Laryngoscope129, E72–E79. doi: 10.1002/lary.27401
35
HeK.WuL.HuangY.ChenQ.QiuB.LiangK.et al. (2022). Efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. J. Clin. Med.11:297. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092297
36
HondaY.NakamuraS.OgawaK.YoshinoR.ToblerP.NishimuraY.et al. (2021). Changes in beta and high-gamma power in resting-state electrocorticogram induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of primary motor cortex in unanesthetized macaque monkeys. Neurosci. Res.171, 41–48. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2021.02.002
37
HoogendamJ. M.RamakersG. M. J.Di LazzaroV. (2010). Physiology of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human brain. Brain Stimul.3, 95–118. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2009.10.005
38
HurtteE.YoungJ.GyawaliC. (2023). Dysphagia. Prim. Care50, 325–338. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2023.03.001
39
IlottI.GerrishK.EltringhamS. A.TaylorC.PownallS. (2016). Exploring factors that influence the spread and sustainability of a dysphagia innovation: an instrumental case study. BMC Health Serv. Res.16:406. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1653-6
40
JangS. H.KimM. S. (2021). Dysphagia in lateral medullary syndrome: a narrative review. Dysphagia36, 329–338. doi: 10.1007/s00455-020-10158-3
41
JeanA. (2001). Brain stem control of swallowing: neuronal network and cellular mechanisms. Physiol. Rev.81, 929–969. doi: 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.2.929
42
JeonY. H.ChoK. H.ParkS. J. (2020). Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) plus upper cervical spine mobilization on forward head posture and swallowing function in stroke patients with dysphagia. Brain Sci.10:478. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10080478
43
KawakamiM.SimeoniS.TremblayS.HannahR.FujiwaraT.RothwellJ. (2019). Changes in the excitability of corticobulbar projections due to intraoral cooling with ice. Dysphagia34, 708–712. doi: 10.1007/s00455-018-09975-4
44
KesikburunS. (2022). Non-invasive brain stimulation in rehabilitation. Turk. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil.68, 1–8. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2022.10608
45
KhedrE. M.MohamedK. O.SolimanR. K.HassanA. M. M.RothwellJ. C. (2019). The effect of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on advancing Parkinson's disease with dysphagia: double blind randomized clinical trial. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair33, 442–452. doi: 10.1177/1545968319847968
46
KocicaJ.LasotovaN.KolcavaJ.SvobodovaM.HladikovaM.StouracP.et al. (2024). Screening for dysphagia in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord.83:105418. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.105418
47
KonecnyP.ElfmarkM. (2018). Electrical stimulation of hyoid muscles in post-stroke dysphagia. Biomed. Pap. Med. Fac. Univ. Palacky Olomouc Czec. Repub.162, 40–42. doi: 10.5507/bp.2017.043
48
LabeitB.ClausI.MuhleP.LapaS.Suntrup-KruegerS.DziewasR.et al. (2020a). Oropharyngeal freezing and its relation to dysphagia - an analogy to freezing of gait. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord.75, 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2020.05.002
49
LabeitB.ClausI.MuhleP.Suntrup-KruegerS.DziewasR.WarneckeT. (2020b, 2020). Effect of intestinal levodopa-carbidopa infusion on pharyngeal dysphagia: results from a retrospective pilot study in patients with Parkinson's disease. Parkinsons Dis.2020:4260501. doi: 10.1155/2020/4260501
50
LabeitB.JungA.AhringS.OelenbergS.MuhleP.RoderigoM.et al. (2023). Relationship between post-stroke dysphagia and pharyngeal sensory impairment. Neurol. Res. Pract.5:7. doi: 10.1186/s42466-023-00233-z
51
LabeitB.MichouE.Trapl-GrundschoberM.Suntrup-KruegerS.MuhleP.BathP. M.et al. (2024). Dysphagia after stroke: research advances in treatment interventions. Lancet Neurol.23, 418–428. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00053-X
52
LefaucheurJ.-P. (2016). A comprehensive database of published tDCS clinical trials (2005-2016). Clin. Neurophysiol.46, 319–398. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2016.10.002
53
LiY.ChenK.WangJ.LuH.LiX.YangL.et al. (2022). Research progress on transcranial magnetic stimulation for post-stroke dysphagia. Front. Behav. Neurosci.16:995614. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.995614
54
LiW.KangX.RenJ.LaiX.TaiL. (2017). Effects of extended in-patient treatment training on outcome of post-stroke dysphagia. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci.21, 5711–5716. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201712_14017
55
LiK.-P.WuJ.-J.ZhouZ.-L.XuD.-S.ZhengM.-X.HuaX.-Y.et al. (2023). Noninvasive brain stimulation for neurorehabilitation in post-stroke patients. Brain Sci.13:30451. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13030451
56
LogemannJ.PauloskiB.ColangeloL.LazarusC.FujiuM.KahrilasP. (1995). Effects of a sour bolus on oropharyngeal swallowing measures in patients with neurogenic dysphagia. J. Speec Hear. Res.38, 556–563. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3803.556
57
MaoH.LyuY.LiY.GanL.NiJ.LiuL.et al. (2022). Clinical study on swallowing function of brainstem stroke by tDCS. Neurol. Sci.43, 477–484. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05247-6
58
McCartyE. B.ChaoT. N. (2021). Dysphagia and swallowing disorders. Med. Clin. North Am.105, 939–954. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2021.05.013
59
Medicine DRCO (2023). Chinese guidelines for the rehabilitation management of dysphagia (2023 edition). Chin. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil.45, 1057–1072. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1424.2023.12.001
60
MengP.ZhangS.WangQ.WangP.HanC.GaoJ.et al. (2018). The effect of surface neuromuscular electrical stimulation on patients with post-stroke dysphagia. J. Back Musculoskelet. Rehabil.31, 363–370. doi: 10.3233/bmr-170788
61
MillerS.PetersK.PtokM. (2022). Review of the effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the treatment of dysphagia - an update. Ger. Med. Sci.20:Doc08. doi: 10.3205/000310
62
MiuraY.MoritaY.KoizumiH.ShingaiT. (2009). Effects of taste solutions, carbonation, and cold stimulus on the power frequency content of swallowing submental surface electromyography. Chem. Senses34, 325–331. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjp005
63
MorishitaM.SotaJ.KobayashiM. (2023). Effects of carbonated beverages on sustained swallowing behavior changes in older inpatients. Physiol. Behav.265:114172. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2023.114172
64
NaganoA.MaedaK.ShimizuA.MurotaniK.MoriN. (2022). Effects of carbonation on swallowing: systematic review and Meta-analysis. Laryngoscope132, 1924–1933. doi: 10.1002/lary.30019
65
NakamuraT.FujishimaI. (2013). Usefulness of ice massage in triggering the swallow reflex. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis.22, 378–382. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.09.016
66
NascimentoW.TomsenN.AcedoS.Campos-AlcantaraC.CabibC.Alvarez-LarruyM.et al. (2021). Effect of aging, gender and sensory stimulation of TRPV1 receptors with capsaicin on spontaneous swallowing frequency in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia: a proof-of-concept study. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)11:461. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030461
67
OhJ.-C. (2016). Effects of tongue-hold swallows on suprahyoid muscle activation according to the relative tongue protrusion length: a preliminary study. Springerplus5:1144. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2799-8
68
OhD.ParkJ.KimH.ChangM.HwangN. (2020). The effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation with different electrode positions on swallowing in stroke patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia: a randomized trial. J. Back Musculoskelet. Rehabil.33, 637–644. doi: 10.3233/bmr-181133
69
OmariT.CiucciM.GozdzikowskaK.HernándezE.HutchesonK.JonesC.et al. (2020). High-resolution pharyngeal manometry and impedance: protocols and metrics-recommendations of a high-resolution pharyngeal manometry international working group. Dysphagia35, 281–295. doi: 10.1007/s00455-019-10023-y
70
PalmerP.McCullochT.JaffeD.NeelA. (2005). Effects of a sour bolus on the intramuscular electromyographic (EMG) activity of muscles in the submental region. Dysphagia20, 210–217. doi: 10.1007/s00455-005-0017-x
71
PanebiancoM.Marchese-RagonaR.MasieroS.RestivoD. A. (2020). Dysphagia in neurological diseases: a literature review. Neurol. Sci.41, 3067–3073. doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04495-2
72
ParkJ.OhD.HwangN.LeeJ. (2018). Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease and dysphagia: a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial. NeuroRehabilitation42, 457–463. doi: 10.3233/nre-172306
73
PatelB.LegacyJ.HeglandK. W.OkunM. S.HerndonN. E. (2020). A comprehensive review of the diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson's disease dysphagia and aspiration. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.14, 411–424. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2020.1769475
74
PelletierC.LawlessH. (2003). Effect of citric acid and citric acid-sucrose mixtures on swallowing in neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia. Dysphagia18, 231–241. doi: 10.1007/s00455-003-0013-y
75
PetkoB.TadiP. (2023). Neuroanatomy, nucleus Ambiguus. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
76
PisegnaJ.KaneokaA.PearsonW.KumarS.LangmoreS. (2016). Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin. Neurophysiol.127, 956–968. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.04.069
77
QinY.TangY.LiuX.QiuS. (2023). Neural basis of dysphagia in stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Hum. Neurosci.17:1077234. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1077234
78
QinL.ZhangX.-P.YangX.-C.CuiC.-H.ShiJ.JiaC.-S. (2019). Deep acupuncture of Lianquan (CV23) and Yifeng (TE17) in combination with conventional acupuncture of other acupoints is superior to swallowing rehabilitation training in improving post-stroke dysphagia in apoplexy patients. Zhen Ci Yan Jiu44, 144–147. doi: 10.13702/j.1000-0607.180018
79
RaoJ.LiF.ZhongL.WangJ.PengY.LiuH.et al. (2022). Bilateral cerebellar intermittent Theta burst stimulation combined with swallowing speech therapy for dysphagia after stroke: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, Clinical Trial. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair36, 437–448. doi: 10.1177/15459683221092995
80
ReganJ. (2020). Impact of sensory stimulation on Pharyngo-esophageal swallowing biomechanics in adults with dysphagia: a high-resolution manometry study. Dysphagia35, 825–833. doi: 10.1007/s00455-019-10088-9
81
RiddingM.RothwellJ. (2007). Is there a future for therapeutic use of transcranial magnetic stimulation?Nat. Rev. Neurosci.8, 559–567. doi: 10.1038/nrn2169
82
RofesL.ArreolaV.AlmirallJ.CabréM.CampinsL.García-PerisP.et al. (2011). Diagnosis and management of oropharyngeal dysphagia and its nutritional and respiratory complications in the elderly. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract.2011, 1–13. doi: 10.1155/2011/818979
83
RoostaeiT.NazeriA.SahraianM. A.MinagarA. (2014). The human cerebellum: a review of physiologic neuroanatomy. Neurol. Clin.32, 859–869. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2014.07.013
84
SaconatoM.ChiariB. M.LedermanH. M.GonçalvesM. I. R. (2016). Effectiveness of Chin-tuck maneuver to facilitate swallowing in neurologic dysphagia. Int. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol.20, 13–17. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1564721
85
SasegbonA.ChengI.HamdyS. (2024). The neurorehabilitation of post-stroke dysphagia: physiology and pathophysiology. J. Physiol. doi: 10.1113/JP285564
86
SasegbonA.ChengI.ZhangM.HamdyS. (2020a). Advances in the use of neuromodulation for neurogenic dysphagia: mechanisms and therapeutic application of pharyngeal electrical stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and transcranial direct current stimulation. Am. J. Speech Lang. Pathol.29, 1044–1064. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-19-00073
87
SasegbonA.HamdyS. (2023). The role of the cerebellum in swallowing. Dysphagia38, 497–509. doi: 10.1007/s00455-021-10271-x
88
SasegbonA.SmithC.BathP.RothwellJ.HamdyS. (2020b). The effects of unilateral and bilateral cerebellar rTMS on human pharyngeal motor cortical activity and swallowing behavior. Exp. Brain Res.238, 1719–1733. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05787-x
89
SasegbonA.WatanabeM.SimonsA.MichouE.VasantD.MagaraJ.et al. (2019). Cerebellar repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation restores pharyngeal brain activity and swallowing behaviour after disruption by a cortical virtual lesion. J. Physiol.597, 2533–2546. doi: 10.1113/jp277545
90
SdravouK.WalsheM.DagdilelisL. (2012). Effects of carbonated liquids on oropharyngeal swallowing measures in people with neurogenic dysphagia. Dysphagia27, 240–250. doi: 10.1007/s00455-011-9359-8
91
SeoK.-H.JangJ.JangE. G.ParkY.LeeS. Y.KimB. R.et al. (2021). Clinical effectiveness of the sequential 4-channel NMES compared with that of the conventional 2-channel NMES for the treatment of dysphagia in a prospective double-blind randomized controlled study. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil.18:90. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00884-6
92
ShawS. M.MartinoR. (2013). The normal swallow: muscular and neurophysiological control. Otolaryngol. Clin. N. Am.46, 937–956. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2013.09.006
93
SpeyerR.SuttA.-L.BergströmL.HamdyS.PomméeT.BalaguerM.et al. (2022). Neurostimulation in people with oropharyngeal dysphagia: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials-part II: brain Neurostimulation. J. Clin. Med.11:993. doi: 10.3390/jcm11040993
94
TanC.LiuY.LiW.LiuJ.ChenL. (2013). Transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation can improve swallowing function in patients with dysphagia caused by non-stroke diseases: a meta-analysis. J. Oral Rehabil.40, 472–480. doi: 10.1111/joor.12057
95
Tedesco TriccasL.BurridgeJ. H.HughesA. M.PickeringR. M.DesikanM.RothwellJ. C.et al. (2016). Multiple sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation and upper extremity rehabilitation in stroke: a review and meta-analysis. Clin. Neurophysiol.127, 946–955. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.04.067
96
TeismannI.SteinstraeterO.StoeckigtK.SuntrupS.WollbrinkA.PantevC.et al. (2007). Functional oropharyngeal sensory disruption interferes with the cortical control of swallowing. BMC Neurosci.8:62. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-8-62
97
VasantD.MichouE.MistryS.RothwellJ.HamdyS. (2015). High-frequency focal repetitive cerebellar stimulation induces prolonged increases in human pharyngeal motor cortex excitability. J. Physiol.593, 4963–4977. doi: 10.1113/jp270817
98
WangJ.ChangE.JiangY. (2022). Effects of vitamin C stimulation on rehabilitation of dysphagia after stroke: a randomized trial. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabilitation Med.58, 558–564. doi: 10.23736/s1973-9087.22.07337-3
99
WangZ.ChenJ.LinZ.NiG. (2020). Transcranial direct current stimulation improves the swallowing function in patients with cricopharyngeal muscle dysfunction following a brainstem stroke. Neurol. Sci.41, 569–574. doi: 10.1007/s10072-019-04120-x
100
WangZ.XiaoZ.ShenQ.ZhaoN.ZhangW. (2023). Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for post-stroke dysphagia treatment: a systemic evaluation and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dysphagia39, 424–432. doi: 10.1007/s00455-023-10626-6
101
WarneckeT.LabeitB.SchroederJ.ReckelsA.AhringS.LapaS.et al. (2021). Neurogenic dysphagia: systematic review and proposal of a classification system. Neurology96, e876–e889. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011350
102
XiaX.ZhangW.GuoJ.ChangX.ZhaoR.WangJ.et al. (2023). Diagnostic utility of different dysphagia screening tools to detect dysphagia in individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurol. Sci.44, 3919–3927. doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-06918-2
103
YamamotoR.SugiyamaY.HashimotoK.KinoshitaS.TakemuraA.FuseS.et al. (2022). Firing characteristics of swallowing interneurons in the dorsal medulla during physiologically induced swallowing in perfused brainstem preparation in rats. Neurosci. Res.177, 64–77. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2021.11.006
104
YamamuraK.KuroseM.OkamotoK. (2018). Guide to enhancing swallowing initiation: insights from findings in healthy subjects and Dysphagic patients. Curr. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Rep.6, 178–185. doi: 10.1007/s40141-018-0192-y
105
YangS.ParkJ.-W.MinK.LeeY. S.SongY.-J.ChoiS. H.et al. (2023). Clinical practice guidelines for oropharyngeal dysphagia. Ann. Rehabil. Med.47, S1–S26. doi: 10.5535/arm.23069
106
YeQ.YuanS.YaoL.DaiY.DengB.HuJ.et al. (2024). Participation of the nucleus tractus solitarius in the therapeutic effect of electroacupuncture on post-stroke dysphagia through the primary motor cortex. CNS Neurosci. Ther.30:e14442. doi: 10.1111/cns.14442
107
ZengY.YipJ.CuiH.GuanL.ZhuH.ZhangW.et al. (2018). Efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in improving the negative psychological state in patients with cerebral infarction and dysphagia. Neurol. Res.40, 473–479. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2018.1451015
108
ZhangY.DouZ.ZhaoF.XieC.ShiJ.YangC.et al. (2022). Neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves swallowing initiation in patients with post-stroke dysphagia. Front. Neurosci.16:1011824. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1011824
109
ZhongL.WenX.LiuZ.LiF.MaX.LiuH.et al. (2023). Effects of bilateral cerebellar repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in poststroke dysphagia: a randomized sham-controlled trial. NeuroRehabilitation52, 227–234. doi: 10.3233/NRE-220268
Summary
Keywords
Parkinson’s disease, stroke, schizophrenia, dysphagia, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, sensory stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation
Citation
Li K, Fu C, Xie Z, Zhang J, Zhang C, Li R, Gao C, Wang J, Xue C, Zhang Y and Deng W (2024) The impact of physical therapy on dysphagia in neurological diseases: a review. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 18:1404398. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1404398
Received
28 March 2024
Accepted
28 May 2024
Published
06 June 2024
Volume
18 - 2024
Edited by
Elisa Kallioniemi, New Jersey Institute of Technology, United States
Reviewed by
Maja Rogić Vidaković, University of Split, Croatia
Anna-Lisa Schuler, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Germany
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Li, Fu, Xie, Zhang, Zhang, Li, Gao, Wang, Xue, Zhang and Deng.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kun Li, likunyjs@163.com; Wei Deng, dengw@zju.edu.cn
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.