AUTHOR=Tibermacine Imad Eddine , Russo Samuele , Citeroni Francesco , Mancini Giuseppe , Rabehi Abdelaziz , Alharbi Amal H. , El-kenawy El-Sayed M. , Napoli Christian 

TITLE=Adversarial denoising of EEG signals: a comparative analysis of standard GAN and WGAN-GP approaches

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

VOLUME=Volume 19 - 2025

YEAR=2025

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/human-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2025.1583342

DOI=10.3389/fnhum.2025.1583342

ISSN=1662-5161

ABSTRACT=IntroductionElectroencephalography (EEG) signals frequently contain substantial noise and interference, which can obscure clinically and scientifically relevant features. Traditional denoising approaches, such as linear filtering or wavelet thresholding, often struggle with nonlinear or time-varying artifacts. In response, the present study explores a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) framework to enhance EEG signal quality, focusing on two variants: a conventional GAN model and a Wasserstein GAN with Gradient Penalty (WGAN-GP).MethodsData were obtained from two distinct EEG datasets: a “healthy” set of 64-channel recordings collected during various motor/imagery tasks, and an “unhealthy” set of 18-channel recordings from individuals with orthopedic impairments. Both datasets underwent comprehensive preprocessing, including band-pass filtering (8–30 Hz), channel standardization, and artifact trimming. The training stage involved adversarial learning, in which a generator sought to reconstruct clean EEG signals while a discriminator (or critic in the case of WGAN-GP) attempted to distinguish between real and generated signals. The model evaluation was conducted using quantitative metrics such as signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), correlation coefficient, mutual information, and dynamic time warping (DTW) distance.ResultsExperimental findings indicate that adversarial learning substantially improves EEG signal fidelity across multiple quantitative metrics. Specifically, WGAN-GP achieved an SNR of up to 14.47 dB (compared to 12.37 dB for the standard GAN) and exhibited greater training stability, as evidenced by consistently lower relative root mean squared error (RRMSE) values. In contrast, the conventional GAN model excelled in preserving finer signal details, reflected in a PSNR of 19.28 dB and a correlation coefficient exceeding 0.90 in several recordings. Both adversarial frameworks outperformed classical wavelet-based thresholding and linear filtering methods, demonstrating superior adaptability to nonlinear distortions and dynamic interference patterns in EEG time-series data.DiscussionBy systematically comparing standard GAN and WGAN-GP architectures, this study highlights a practical trade-off between aggressive noise suppression and high-fidelity signal reconstruction. The demonstrated improvements in signal quality underscore the promise of adversarially trained models for applications ranging from basic neuroscience research to real-time brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) in clinical or consumer-grade settings. The results further suggest that GAN-based frameworks can be easily scaled to next-generation wireless networks and complex electrophysiological datasets, offering robust and dynamic solutions to long-standing challenges in EEG denoising.