There is a common etiologic feature in HPV-driven cancer that the emergence and function of viral oncogene expression (E6/E7) are related to the tumor cells, far away from stromal cells. Relevant research confirmed that most HPV-driven cancers can classify the oncogenic proteins E6/E7 to inactivate the host tumor suppressors p53 and RB, respectively. In the process of cell oncogenesis, E6 and E7 promote the replication of the viral genome and induce malignant biological properties, including uncontrolled cellular proliferation, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis (75) ( Figure 3 ). A previous study showed that E6/E7-inactivated HeLa cells displayed distinctive senescence markers, such as an enlarged cell surface area (1).

E6/E7 and their complex have deserved as specific targets in gene therapy. Several strategies targeting E6/E7 have been reported, including cytotoxic drugs and zinc-ejecting inhibitors of the viral E6 oncoprotein (76–78), E7 antagonist peptide (79), and HSP90 and GRP78 inhibitors targeting E6 and E7 (80). Recently, CRISPR-Cas9 has entered into clinical trials as a novel therapeutic strategy. The therapeutic mechanism of CRISPR-Cas9-mediated downregulation of E6 and E7 normally attributes to the inactivation of p53 and RB to set off apoptosis and mobile senescence.

High-risk HPVs (such as HPV-16 and HPV-18) can encode viral oncoproteins E6 and E7 in tumor cells, most common in cervical and penile cancers. The targeted gene by CRISPR-Cas9 performed well in a large number of studies. In 2014, the first CRISPR-Cas9 system featuring HPV16-E7 single-guide RNA (gRNA) showed disruption of HPV16-E7 DNA at specific sites induced apoptosis and growth inhibition of HPV-driven cancer cells (31). Further study conducted gene therapy in the K14-HPV16 transgenic mouse model, which had a favorable effect on cervical precancer (53). In 2015, the HPV16-E6 oncogene was cleaved by the customized CRISPR gRNA/Cas9, which demonstrated for the first time that it could be a therapeutic approach to reverse the malignant phenotype and increase the expression of p53 (55). Both viral oncoproteins are therefore regarded as promising targets for gene therapy. The knockdown of E6/E7 has been pronounced in in vivo and vitro trials alongside an accumulation of p53 and p21 protein and should result in remarkably issue of the proliferation of HPV-driven most cancers cells (36, 56).

In addition, other HPV types were also studied for their biological properties and use in genetic therapy with CRISPR-Cas9. As an HR-HPV, HPV-18 has been targeted and tested in vitro and in vivo. Previous studies showed that oncogenes E6 and E7 of HPV18 could be successfully inhibited by the CRISPR-Cas9 system (39, 40, 57, 58). However, HPV-6/11, which are low-risk HPV types most common in anogenital warts and laryngeal papillomatosis, also encode the oncoproteins E6/E7. Thus, a CRISPR−Cas9 system centered on HPV6/11 has been stated as a novel and fairly effective molecular purpose for the treatment and prevention of low-risk HPV-driven diseases (35).

With the deepening look up on HPV, more gene sequences will flip out to be ambitions of gene treatment for HPV illness or remedy of HPV-driven cancer. CRISPR-Cas9 can additionally be used in the preparation of vaccines to prevent HPV infection (81). Nonetheless, the pleasant transport of developed Cas9 plasmids in vivo remains a challenge. Further look up should be carried out to transport Cas9 and gRNA into the intention cell of the human physique and to make positive the biosafety need.

As a promising progressive technological know-how in gene editing, CRISPR-Cas9 provides scientists with a number of alternatives to manipulate the genome of cancers and trade the DNA structure.

Oncogenes are a group of mutated genes that may cause cancer, such as JunB and PIM1. JunB is a unique factor of activator protein-1 transcription factors, appearing both as a tumor suppressor or as an oncogene relying on the cell context (82). JunB knockdown and knockout limited the progression of tumor migration and invasion, suggesting that the downregulation of JunB expression might be a potential therapeutic strategy for inhibiting distant metastasis in patients with HPV-driven cancer (59). Another oncogene, PIM1, encoding a constitutively active serine/threonine protein kinase, was investigated for its functional roles in the viability and growth of HPV-driven cancer cells (83). CRISPR-Cas9-mediated exchange of PIM1 resulted in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in HPV-driven most cancers (62). In addition, the genetic depletion of CDK7 using the CRISPR−Cas9 system exhibited great cell growth inhibition in cervical cancer cell lines (43). Additionally, HPV16-transformed cells with CRISPR−Cas9-mediated loss of p53 were inclined to lose dependence on the continuous expression of HPV oncogenes for proliferation (63).

The identification of cell surface markers in cancer can establish differentiation to target specific sites. Some research confirmed a novel affiliation between HPV-E6 oncoprotein expression and the increase in the CD55 and CD71 floor markers in most cervical cancer cells (60, 61). The HPV-E6 oncoprotein enriched the CD55 and CD71 populations, which increased cell proliferation, cell self-renewal ability, cell migration, radioresistance, and tumorigenicity. The knockdown or knockout of CD55 and CD71 expression in HPV-E6-expressing cells should reverse the tumorigenic phenotypes of most cervical cancer cells.

HPV plays a role in the pathologic process of HPV-driven cancers. This finding suggests that HPV prophylactic vaccines will have a wider range of protection, making us far from a series of HPV-driven cancers, especially in head and neck cancer and cervical cancer, where the expression of HPV is relatively high.

With the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), immunotherapy has emerged as one of the most promising therapeutic strategies for cancer. CRISPR−Cas9, as a versatile and easily used genetic enhancing technology, is frightening a progressive change in most cancer immunotherapies. Recently, CRISPR−Cas9 has been carried out to incite the improvement of therapeutic immune agents, such as chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells and the programmed cell dying protein-1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1) (84).

PD-1 and PD-L1 are negative regulators of the immune responses of T cells (85). Expressed on cervical T cells and DCs. PD-1 and PD-L1 have been lately pronounced to be related to excessive risk-HPV positivity and to be increased along with growing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade (86). Furthermore, the researcher established a C33 cell line stably expressing HPV16 E6/E7 (SiHa-E6/E7) to verify the promotive association between HPV16 E6 and the expression of PD-1. Based on this, they tested whether combined targeted therapy with immunotherapy can 1 + 1 equal more than 2 in the SiHa cervical cancer mouse model. Synergistic effects have been reported for combination therapy targeting HPV16 E6/E7 and PD-1 blockade using CRISPR-Cas9 (46).

EZH2, a catalytic subunit of polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), was reported to block PD-1/PD-L1 axis downregulation. High expression of EZH2 was also associated with tumor cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis and has important clinicopathologic significance (87). EZH2 knockdown or inhibition has been tested in mice with induced endometriosis and prompted EZH2-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in cancers (88). Further research identified EZH2 as a potential therapeutic target for encouraging antigen presentation and antitumor immunity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) (64). The combination of EZH2 inhibition and anti-PD-1 therapy may be beneficial for patients with HNSCC, which requires further preclinical studies.

Academic clinical trials have investigated T cells with PD-1 knocked out by CRISPR-Cas9 for the treatment of multiple types of cancer. Among the trials, it has recently attained a significant therapeutic effect on NSCLC (10). However, we have not found any research directly exploring novel and promising cancer immunotherapy with the knockout of CAR-T or PD-1 by CRISPR−Cas9 in HPV-driven cancers.

For patients with HPV-driven cancers, conventional therapy includes chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or subsequent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). One of the major issues in clinical oncology is the ability of cancer cells to resist chemotherapy drugs, which leads to chemotherapy failure.

In 2016, the first record of HPV16 E6/E7 focused on CRISPR-Cas9 was published, in which the method was once described as a nice sensitizer for bettering CDDP chemotherapy in cervical cancer (36). It ought to efficiently and especially coordinate with CDDP for HPV16 fantastic cervical cancer. This further indicated the position of the blended lineage leukemia 5 (MLL5) in the carcinogenesis of most HPV-positive cervical cancer cells (48). Knockout of MLL5 greatly impacted the chemotherapeutic effectivity of cisplatin in HPV-18-positive cells. Additionally, the finding that MLL5 has a higher anticancer effect than E6 by means of CRISPR-Cas9 has an impact on the disruption of MLL5.

For head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), radiotherapy is one of the most commonly used and effective treatments. However, different HPV genotypes of HPV-driven cancers, such as cervical cancer patients with HPV-18 DNA, have significantly different responses to radiotherapy (89). Recently, a novel screen based on a targeted CRISPR−Cas9 system was applied to identify optimal radiosensitization approaches for HPV-positive/negative HNSCC (90). The combination of radiotherapy and CRISPR−Cas9-mediated inhibition of genetic repair pathways could improve the therapeutic response in patients with HNSCC.

Nucleic acid detection techniques are always crucial to diagnosis, especially in the background of the present coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Despite a wide range of applications of genetic testing tools, the CRISPR-Cas9 system has advantages in the detection field and has been applied in gene editing and regulation. We know that polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is widely applied due to the high sensitivity of the exponential amplification of target DNA. Therefore, PCR has been the most popular DNA detection and genotyping technique, such as detecting SARS-CoV-2 and diagnosing the current COVID-19 pandemic. To date, the combination of PCR and CRISPR techniques provides a new chance for developing new nucleic acid detection and typing techniques.

In 2018, Qiao and Beibei first developed CRISPR-Cas9-associated reverse PCR (CARP), in which Cas9-cut target DNA was cyclized and detected by reverse PCR amplification (71). Due to the reverse PCR amplification of the DNA of interest that was performed in detection, this method had high sensitivity. Based on the technique, they then developed a new method for detecting and typing target DNA based on Cas9 nuclease, which was named ctPCR (72). By using qPCR machines, the whole ctPCR detection process can be finished in as little as 3 to 4 hours. Thus, ctPCR should be useful in DNA detection and genotyping. However, the target DNA was detected and genotyped based on comparing the Ct values and DNA copies of two qPCRs. Afterward, a new version of ctPCR was developed to avoid this comparison step, which symbolized one-pot detection (73). The whole detection process can be finished on PCR instruments without further tube opening.

Outside of the PCR technique, another CRISPR-Cas9-mediated DNA detection method called CRISPR−Cas9-assisted DNA detection (CADD) was developed (74). The detection of target DNA could be completed in less than 30 min, according to the unique advantages over current methods, such as being simple, rapid, and free of preamplification and the application of fluorescent hybridization chain reaction (HCR).

The delivery system of CRISPR-Cas9 applied in the human body remains a challenge. Even when many specific molecular targets are available to select for tumor cells, it is quite controversial to identify an effective and safe transport system. To overcome this issue, researchers have exploited several kinds of carriers, from viral delivery systems to liposomes and from plasmids to nanoparticles. We discussed the pros and cons of each delivery system based on current research reports.

Among the viral shipping vectors, high-capacity adenoviral vectors (HCAdV) have the potential for packaging up to 35 kb, permitting handing over the entire CRISPR-Cas9 equipment inclusive of numerous gRNAs (68). In contrast to adenoviral vectors (AdV), they had no threat of expressing AdV genes with much less immunogenic properties (91). The proof-of-concept for the use of CRISPR-Cas9 delivered by the most superior adenoviral vector (HCAdV) has a considerable impact in treating HPV-derived tumors (57). Nevertheless, manufacturing of HCAdV is intensive in time and work when compared with AAV-vector platforms, hampering their exploration for unique applications. Different from the normal viral shipping system, AAV-based shipping structures have shown predominant benefits (92), which have attracted much attention, especially for therapeutic purposes. Additionally, AAV can have stable transgene expression with long-term existence as a concatemer in nondividing cells (93). The AAV-based CRISPR-Cas9 machine has been used for disruption of the E6 gene in HeLa, which emphasized AAV-based viral vectors as one of the most sensitive viral vectors for gene remedy and gene switch in vivo (40, 58).

However, the viable cytotoxicity, immunogenic response, and long-term expression of viral vectors continue to be issues of scientific application (94). Several nonviral transport techniques have been reported. In 2019, a study indicated the viability of endogenous exosomes as a protected and fantastic transport carrier of the purposeful gRNA and Cas9 protein (70).Scientific hobby in nanoparticles (NPs) is on the rise due to their versatility and, in particular, their large applicability (95). A study has developed NPs consisting of PBAE546 and CRISPR-Cas9 for the treatment of HPV infection, which provides new hope for the clinical transformation of nanomedicine to treat cervical lesions, thereby preventing cervical cancer (52). Other research also confirmed this genetic strategy effectively (49, 67, 96).