AUTHOR=Yu Ruohan , Zhang Lina , Zhang Jing , Long Ting , Li Ji , Zou Yadan , Wang Shangxi , Li Shengguang 

TITLE=The diagnostic and prognostic role of novel biomarkers in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Immunology

VOLUME=Volume 16 - 2025

YEAR=2025

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/immunology/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1588287

DOI=10.3389/fimmu.2025.1588287

ISSN=1664-3224

ABSTRACT=BackgroundANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) is a group of autoimmune diseases characterized by small vessel inflammation, diagnosed primarily through clinical features, histopathology, and ANCA testing. Novel biomarkers derived from routine blood counts, such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), may support disease assessment. This study evaluated their utility in distinguishing AAV patients, reflecting disease activity, and predicting prognosis.MethodsIn this retrospective case-control study, 65 AAV patients and 65 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were enrolled. AAV diagnosis adhered to the 2012 Chapel Hill Consensus and the American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria. NLR, PLR, MLR, SII, and SIRI were calculated from complete blood counts. Disease activity (Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score, BVAS), extent (Disease Extent Index, DEI), damage (Vasculitis Damage Index, VDI), and prognosis (Five-Factor Score, FFS 2009) were assessed. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U tests, Spearman correlations, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to evaluate discriminatory and predictive capacities.ResultsAAV patients exhibited significantly higher NLR (6.94 ± 0.76 vs. 1.88 ± 0.08), PLR (242.44 ± 23.09 vs. 125.97 ± 4.34), MLR (0.44 ± 0.03 vs. 0.20 ± 0.01), SII (1813.71 ± 221.85 vs. 446.62 ± 22.40), and SIRI (3.19 ± 0.31 vs. 0.72 ± 0.06) compared to controls (all P < 0.001). ROC analysis showed strong discriminatory power, with SIRI (AUC = 0.902) and NLR (AUC = 0.885) performing best. NLR, PLR, SII, and SIRI correlated positively with BVAS (rs = 0.325-0.356, P < 0.01) and FFS 2009 (rs = 0.358-0.386, P < 0.05), and all markers correlated with DEI (rs = 0.396-0.488, P < 0.01), but not VDI. For predicting active disease (BVAS ≥ 15), SII had the highest AUC (0.726, P = 0.003).ConclusionsNLR, PLR, MLR, SII, and SIRI effectively distinguish AAV patients from controls and reflect disease activity, extent, and prognosis. While not standalone diagnostic tools, these markers offer valuable support to standard AAV assessment, particularly in challenging cases. Their accessibility suggests potential for enhancing clinical management, pending validation in larger cohorts.