Abstract
Objective:
This study aims to evaluate the influence of polymorphisms of the HSD11B1, FKBP5 and NR3C1 genes on the outcomes of patients with Takayasu arteritis (TAK).
Methods:
A retrospective cohort study including 81 TAK patients was carried out. Polymorphisms of the genes HSD11B1 (rs11119328), FKBP5 (rs1360780) and NR3C1 (N363S, Bcll, TthIIII1, ER22/23EK and 9ß) were genotyped by the Sanger technique. Associations between the gene variants and the haplotypes (HT) of the NR3C1 gene with variables related to the outcome of TAK and glucocorticoid (GC)-related adverse events (AEs) were analyzed.
Results:
The polymorphism 9β of the NR3C1 gene, which leads to decreased GC sensitivity, was associated with a higher frequency of GC-related AEs [3.0 (2.0-3.8) vs. 2.0 (1.0-3.0); p = 0.002] and weight gain (37.5% vs. 8.9%; p = 0.012). Worsening glucose tolerance (i.e., a key GC-related AE) was an independent risk factor for acute ischemic events [odds ratio (OR) between 8.9 and 10.2] in all multivariate logistic regression models that included one of the polymorphisms in each model. Moreover, the carriage of 9β in the NR3C1 gene was also an independent risk factor for developing ischemic arterial events (OR: 4.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-18.3). None of the other polymorphisms of NR3C1, HSD11B1 and FKBP5 were associated with TAK features or outcomes, nor with GC-related AEs.
Conclusion:
Worsening glucose tolerance and the carriage of 9β of the NR3C1 gene were independent risk factors for acute ischemic events in TAK. The 9β polymorphism of the NR3C1 gene was associated with GC-related AEs in TAK in our patient population. None of the gene variants were predictors of sustained remission or arterial progression.
Highlights
Worsening glucose tolerance and the carriage of 9β of the NR3C1 gene were risk factors for acute ischemic events in TAK.
Carriage of 9β of the NR3C1 gene was associated with a higher median of GC-related adverse events.
Other polymorphisms of NR3C1, FKBP5 and HSD11B1 genes were not associated with outcomes in TAK.
Introduction
Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is a chronic granulomatous systemic vasculitis, with no defined etiology, that affects large vessels, involving the aorta and its main branches, as well as pulmonary arteries (). The inflammatory process begins in the adventitia and progresses to all layers of the artery, resulting in concentric thickening of the arterial wall that may lead to structural changes such as stenosis, occlusion, dilatation or aneurysm ().
The treatment of TAK is mainly based on glucocorticoid (GC) use in association with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) or biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) (–). The long-term use of GC in TAK patients leads to an array of adverse events (AEs) that differ widely between patients and different strategies should be applied to minimize the burden of GC toxicity (, ).
Pharmacogenomics is an area of genetics that assesses the influence of individual genetic profiles on the effectiveness and AEs of therapeutic agents. It may be applied to the management of several diseases and is useful the individualization of treatment according to genetic variability in drug receptors or in enzymes involved in drug metabolism ().
Tissue sensitivity to GC may be affected by different variables linked to pharmacogenomics. Firstly, the regulation of GC bioavailability may be influenced by the conversion of cortisone into cortisol, the active form of GC, by 11β hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11βHD1), an enzyme found mainly in the liver and the adipose tissue (). Then, GC is bound to its receptors and its signaling pathways are activated as it exerts immunosuppressive, anti-inflammatory, and antiallergic effects on different immune cells through genomic and non-genomic mechanisms ().
The polymorphism rs11119328 of the HSD11B1 gene is an intronic variant (C>A/C>T) commonly found in the general population with a minor allele A frequency ranging between 0.186 and 0.236. This polymorphism reduces the expression of the 11βHD1 enzyme and results in lower bioavailability of the activated cortisol (). In patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis, the carriage of rs11119328 was associated with an increased relapse rate ().
The FKBP5 gene is located in the short arm of chromosome 6 (6p21) and composed of 10 exons. To date, several intronic FKBP5 polymorphisms have been described, especially rs1360780 (T>A/T>C) which is located in intron 2 (). The T allele carriage leads to decreased tissue sensitivity to GC, and it is associated with psychiatric conditions including depression, borderline personality disorder, post-traumatic stress and suicidality (). Indeed, decreased GC sensitivity is associated with psychiatric events ().
Activated cortisone exerts its genomic effect by binding to GC receptors in the soluble and inactivated form in the cytoplasm of nucleated cells. The NR3C1 gene encodes the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and is located in the long arm of chromosome 5 (5q31.3) with 9 exons and 4.1kb (, ). The NR3C1 gene is very polymorphic; some of its polymorphisms have a functional impact on the effects of cortisol and the pharmacodynamics of exogenous GC. Tissue sensitivity to GC is increased upon the carriage of rs56149945 (N363S) and rs41423247 (BclI) polymorphisms of the NR3C1 gene, while the polymorphisms rs6189 (ER22/23EK), rs6190 (ER22/23EK) and rs6198 (GR-9β) lead to decreased GC sensitivity (). Furthermore, rs10052957 (TthIII1), another polymorphism in the promoter region of the NR3C1 gene, is characterized by the single base change of cytosine for a thymine (C>T) (). TthIII1 alone does not impact GC sensitivity, but the concomitant carriage with ER22/23EK decreases GC sensitivity ().
This study aims to evaluate different polymorphisms of the NR3C1, FKBP5 and HSD11B1 genes and their impact on the clinical outcomes of TAK and GC-related AEs.
Patients and methods
Study design and patients
We carried out a retrospective cohort study with prospective genetic analysis, including 81 TAK patients who were selected from the Vasculitis Outpatient Clinic of the Rheumatology Division at the Universidade Federal de São Paulo/Escola Paulista de Medicina (Unifesp/EPM) between March 2022 and August 2023. The inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, fulfilment of the 2022 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology criteria for TAK (), treatment with GC at any stage after diagnosis of the disease and written informed consent. Patients with chronic infectious diseases or systemic inflammatory/autoimmune diseases associated with TAK were excluded. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Unifesp/EPM (CAAE: 45377121.5.0000.5505) and all study procedures were carried out according to the Declaration of Helsinki and its updates.
Data collection
Patients’ information was collected from the medical records during their follow-up between the years 2014 and 2023. Details about clinical characteristics and outcome measures evaluated in the study are depicted in Supplementary Table S1. Relevant comorbidities for mortality risk were scored using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (). Adverse events attributed to GC use were defined according to the Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (GTI), as shown in Supplementary Table S2. The GC-related AEs included GC-induced hyperlipidemia, worsening systemic hypertension, worsening glucose tolerance, deterioration of bone mineral density (BMD), weight gain, cataract, skin lesions and severe infection. Worsening glucose tolerance included patients with previous diagnosis of diabetes, and those who developed hemoglobin A1c above 5.7% after GC therapy (). Permanent damage related to TAK was assessed using two tools: the Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI) and the Takayasu Arteritis Damage Score (TADS) (, ). Stable disease in TAK was defined as the absence of disease relapse or of the development of new arterial lesions in previously unaffected vascular territories during follow-up ().
Genotyping and determination of haplotypes
After DNA extraction from the peripheral blood, genotyping was carried out in the Genetics Laboratory at UNIFESP-EPM. Polymorphism genotyping was performed using the Sanger sequencing method. The following polymorphisms were evaluated TthIII1 (rs10052957), ER22/23EK (rs6189/6190), N363S (rs56149945) BclI (rs41423247) and 9β (rs6198) in the NR3C1 gene; rs11119328 in the HSD11B1 gene; and rs1360780 in the FKBP5 gene. The haplotypes (HT) of the polymorphisms in the NR3C1 gene were determined by the PHASE software as previously reported (, ). HT0 was defined as the absence of any of the above-mentioned polymorphisms, HT1 as the presence of the minor allele of BclI, HT2 as the presence of the minor allele of TthIII1 and BclI, and HT3 as the presence of the minor allele of TthIII1 and 9ß. Other NR3C1 HT with a frequency below 5% were not analyzed. Figure 1 depicts the location of the SNP of the NR3C1 gene and all HT evaluated.
Figure 1
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics included mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range (IQR), for quantitative variables and frequency with proportion, for categorical variables. Continuous variables were compared for two groups using Student’s t-test for normally distributed variables or Mann-Whitney’s U test for variables with non-Gaussian distribution. Comparisons among three groups for continuous variables were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test or by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to compare the cumulative prednisone dose adjusted for the duration of therapy between the carriers and non-carriers of each polymorphism and haplotypes. Categorical variables were evaluated using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Multivariate logistic regression models were built to evaluate predictors of acute arterial ischemic events and stable disease (i.e., no new arterial lesions during follow-up), and results were expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The accepted significance level was 5% (p-value < 0.05). The IBM SPSS software for Windows version 21.0 (Armonk, NY) was used to perform statistical analysis of the data. GraphPad Prism for Windows version 9.0 (Boston, MA) was used to build graphs. The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium assessment was performed using R Software version 4.3.2.
Results
Characteristics of TAK patients
Eighty-one TAK patients were included in the study. Figure 2 describes patients’ inclusion in the study, as well as polymorphisms and haplotypes assessed in the study. The patients were mostly female (90.1%) and had a mean age of 29.6 ± 11.4 years, and a median of 85.0 months (54.0-103.0) of follow-up. Acute arterial ischemic events were observed in 28.4% of the patients and coronary artery disease was more common than stroke or transient ischemic attacks. Table 1 describes the disease characteristics and ischemic events of TAK patients. Most patients were Whites or Mestizos (i.e., 84% of study participants). Angiographic type V was the most frequent type (71.6%), according to the classification of Hata and Numano (), followed by types I (13.6%), IV (7.4%) and IIb (4.9%) (Table 1).
Figure 2
Table 1
| Variables | Results (n = 81) |
|---|---|
| Age at diagnosis, years | 29.6 ± 11.4 |
| Race | |
| Whites, n (%) | 46 (56.8) |
| Mestizos, n (%) | 22 (27.2) |
| Blacks, n (%) | 10 (12.3) |
| Asians, n (%) | 3 (3.7) |
| Median disease duration, months | 85.0 (54.0-103.0) |
| Acute phase reactants at diagnosis | |
| ESR, mm/hour | 29.5 (14.0-50.3) |
| CRP, mg/L | 4.9 (1.0-10.7) |
| Angiographic types | |
| Type V, n (%) | 58 (71.6) |
| Type I, n (%) | 11 (13.6) |
| Type IV, n (%) | 6 (7.4) |
| Type IIb, n (%) | 4 (4.9) |
| Type IIa, n (%) | 1 (1.2) |
| Type III, n (%) | 1 (1.2) |
| Ischemic events, n (%) | 23 (28.4) |
| Number of ischemic events | 32 |
| MI, n (%) | 7 (30.4) |
| Angina pectoris, n (%) | 9 (39.1) |
| TIA, n (%) | 4 (17.4) |
| Stroke, n (%) | 6 (26.1) |
| Abdominal angina, n (%) | 5 (21.7) |
| Subclavian steal syndrome, n (%) | 13 (16.0) |
| Renovascular hypertension, n (%) | 19 (23.5) |
| Involvement of pulmonary arteries, n (%) | 14 (17.3) |
| Progression of arterial lesions, n (%) | 42 (51.9) |
Characteristics of TAK patients evaluated in the study.
TIA, Transient ischemic attack; MI, Myocardial infarction; n, Number of patients; ESR, Erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP, C-reactive protein.
Approximately half of the patients had progressive arterial lesions (i.e., the development of arterial lesions in previously unaffected territories) during the follow-up period (51.9%). TAK patients presented renovascular hypertension (23.5%), pulmonary artery involvement (17.3%) and subclavian steal syndrome (16.0%) (Table 1). At the end of the follow-up, the median and IQR were [2.0 (1.0-3.0)] for the Charlson Comorbidity Index, [2.0 (2.0-4.0)] for VDI and [5.0 (3.0-7.0)] for TADS.
Regarding TAK therapy with csDMARDs, methotrexate, leflunomide and azathioprine were used at any time during the follow-up in 73 (90.1%), 54 (66.6%) and 27 (33.3%) patients, respectively. On the other hand, bDMARDs, mostly TNF inhibitors, were prescribed for 55.6% of the patients.
GC-related AEs
At the end of the follow-up, the median cumulative prednisone dose was 10,741.00 mg (5,840.63-22,547.88) and the median GTI score was 46.0 (19.0-76.0). At least one GC-related AE was observed in 82.7% of patients, and the median number of GC-related AEs was 2.0 (1.0-3.0). The frequencies of GC-related AEs were as follows: GC-induced hyperlipidemia (50.6%), worsening systemic hypertension (27.2%), worsening glucose tolerance (19.8%), deterioration of BMD (19.8%), weight gain (13.6%), severe infection (8.6%), skin lesions (6.2%), and cataract (3.7%). Among patients with worsening glucose tolerance, 81.3% had had a previous diagnosis of diabetes and needed to increase their diabetic medication, whereas 18.7% developed HbA1c levels above 5.7% upon GC therapy. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head and GC-induced psychosis were rare complications of GC therapy as they were each observed in only one TAK patient.
Genotyping of TAK patients for the HSD11B1, FKBP5 and NR3C1 polymorphisms
The minor allele frequencies of the HSD11B1 and FKBP5 gene polymorphisms (i.e., rs11119328 and rs1360780) were 33.3% and 55.6%, respectively, while the minor alleles of NR3C1 polymorphisms were found in 37.0% for BclI, 19.7% for 9β, 3.7% for ER22/23EK and 1.2% for N363S. The minor alleles were predominantly in heterozygosis. The minor allele of the TthIII1 polymorphism was present in 41.3% of TAK patients. Supplementary Table S3 depicts the number of TAK patients who are homozygous and heterozygous for each polymorphism of HSD11B1, FKBP5 and NR3C1 genes. The rs11119328, rs1360780, BclI and 9β alleles were all in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The frequencies of HT1, HT2 and HT3 of the NR3C1 gene were 20%, 15% and 15% respectively. HT4 and HT5 were only found in 2 and 1 TAK patients, respectively.
The frequency of minor alleles of the HSD11B, FKBP5 and NR3C1 genes was compared among the ethnic groups (i.e., Whites, Mestizos and Blacks) with TAK. No significant differences were found in the carriage of the minor alleles of HSD11B, FKBP5 and NR3C1 genes among ethnic groups of TAK patients (Supplementary Table S4). These analyses did not include Asians since only three individuals had an Asian background in this study. Each of the rs1119382, rs1360780 and BclI polymorphisms was found in only one Asian patient. The 9β and TthIII1 polymorphisms of the NR3C1 gene were not found in Asians.
Associations between the carriage of HSD11B1, FKBP5 and NR3C1 polymorphisms and the outcomes of TAK
No significant associations were found between the carriage of the polymorphisms rs11119328 of HSD11B1, rs1360780 of FKBP5, and BclI and 9β of NR3C1 and disease features or outcomes of TAK such as angiographic type V, subclavian steal syndrome, renovascular hypertension, pulmonary artery involvement, sustained remission, need for therapy with bDMARD, progressive arterial lesions, TADS score, VDI, and need for vascular interventions (Tables 2, 3). Additionally, comparisons between carriers and non-carriers of HSD11B1, FKBP5, and BclI polymorphisms yielded no significant results in regard to GC-related AEs, severe infections, GTI score, CCI and cumulative prednisone dose (Tables 2, 3). However, carriers of the 9β polymorphism had a higher median number of GC-related AEs compared to non-carriers (Table 3).
Table 2
| Variables | Carriers (n = 27) | Non carriers (n = 54) | p | Carriers (n = 44) | Non carriers (n =35) | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HSD11B1 rs11119328 | FKBP5 rs1360780 | |||||
| TAK features and outcomes | TAK features and outcomes | |||||
| Subclavian steal syndrome, n (%) | 6 (22.2) | 7 (13.0) | 0.341 | 7 (15.9) | 5 (14.3) | 0.842 |
| Renovascular hypertension, n (%) | 7 (25.9) | 12 (22.2) | 0.711 | 12 (27.3) | 7 (20.0) | 0.452 |
| Pulmonary artery involvement, n (%) | 5 (18.5) | 9 (16.7) | 1.000 | 9 (20.5) | 5 (14.3) | 0.476 |
| Angiographic type V, n (%) | 20 (74.1) | 38 (70.4) | 0.727 | 32 (72.7) | 25 (71.4) | 0.898 |
| Ischemic events, n (%) | 6 (22.2) | 17 (31.5) | 0.384 | 11 (25.0) | 11 (31.4) | 0.527 |
| Sustained remission, n (%) | 16 (59.3) | 33 (61.1) | 0.872 | 25 (56.8) | 22 (62.9) | 0.587 |
| Progression of arterial lesions, n (%) | 15 (55.6) | 27 (50.0) | 0.637 | 21 (47.7) | 21 (60.0) | 0.278 |
| Need for bDMARD therapy, n (%) | 18 (66.7) | 27 (50.0) | 0.155 | 24 (54.5) | 21 (60.0) | 0.627 |
| TADS | 5.0 (2.5-8.0) | 4.5 (3.0-6.7) | 0.965 | 5.0 (2.3-6.0) | 4.5 (3.0-8.8) | 0.264 |
| VDI | 3.0 (1.2-4.0) | 2.0 (2.0-3.0) | 0.640 | 2.0 (2.0-3.0) | 3.0 (2.0-5.0) | 0.066 |
| Vascular interventions, n (%) | 9 (33.3) | 18 (33.3) | 1.000 | 15 (34.1) | 12 (34.3) | 0.986 |
| GC-related variables | GC-related variables | |||||
| Presence of GC-related AEs, n (%) | 16 (66.7) | 32 (66.7) | 1.000 | 28 (66.7) | 20 (69.0) | 0.839 |
| Number of GC-related AEs, n (%) | 1.5 (1.0-3.0) | 2.0 (0.3-3.0) | 0.912 | 2.0 (1.0-3.0) | 3.0 (1.0-3.0) | 0.378 |
| Severe infections, n (%) | 3 (12.5) | 3 (6.3) | 0.393 | 3 (7.1) | 3 (10.3) | 0.683 |
| GTI | 40.0 (19.0-91.5) | 46.0 (19.0-71.0) | 0.598 | 38.5 (19.0-74.3) | 50.0 (19.0-92.0) | 0.700 |
| CCI | 1.0 (1.0-2.5) | 2.0 (1.0-3.0) | 0.380 | 1.0 (1.0-3.0) | 2.0 (1.0-3.0) | 0.689 |
| Cumulative prednisone dose, mg | 14,553.75 ± 1,413.66 | 13,126.49 ± 995.78 | 0.414 | 13,334.54 ± 1,072.72 | 14,124.53 ± 1,291.86 | 0.640 |
Associations between TAK features, outcomes and GC-related variables with HSD11B1 and FKBP5 polymorphisms carriage.
AEs, Adverse events; bDMARD, Biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index; GC, Glucocorticoid; GTI, Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index; n, Number of patients; TADS, Takayasu arteritis Damage Score; TAK, Takayasu arteritis. The mean cumulative dose of prednisone was adjusted to the duration of therapy.
Table 3
| Variables | Carriers (n = 28) | Non carriers (n = 44) | p | Carriers (n = 16) | Non carriers (n = 56) | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NR3C1 BclI | NR3C1 9β | |||||
| TAK features and outcomes | TAK features and outcomes | |||||
| Subclavian steal syndrome, n (%) | 6 (20.0) | 7 (13.72) | 0.536 | 5 (31.3) | 8 (12.3) | 0.120 |
| Renovascular hypertension, n (%) | 10 (33.3) | 9 (17.6) | 0.108 | 3 (18.8) | 16 (24.6) | 0.751 |
| Pulmonary artery involvement, n (%) | 3 (10.0) | 11 (21.6) | 0.184 | 4 (25.0) | 10 (15.4) | 0.460 |
| Angiographic type V, n (%) | 23 (76.7) | 35 (68.6) | 0.438 | 10 (62.5) | 48 (73.8) | 0.371 |
| Ischemic events, n (%) | 9 (30.0) | 14 (27.5) | 0.806 | 8 (50.0) | 15 (23.1) | 0.060 |
| Sustained remission, n (%) | 17 (56.7) | 32 (62.7) | 0.589 | 7 (43.8) | 42(64.6) | 0.126 |
| Progression of arterial lesions, n (%) | 15 (50.0) | 27 (52.9) | 0.798 | 8 (50.0) | 34 (52.3) | 0.869 |
| Need for bDMARD therapy, n (%) | 16 (53.3) | 29 (56.9) | 0.758 | 9 (56.3) | 36 (55.4) | 0.950 |
| TADS | 4.0 (3.0-6.7) | 5.0 (3.5-7.5) | 0.263 | 6.0 (4.3-9.0) | 4.0 (3.0-6.0) | 0.117 |
| VDI | 2.0 (1.0-3.2) | 3.0 (2.0-4.0) | 0.416 | 3.0 (2.0-4.5) | 2.0 (2.0-4.0) | 0.381 |
| Vascular interventions, n (%) | 10 (33.3) | 17 (33.3) | 1.000 | 5 (31.3) | 22 (33.8) | 0.844 |
| GC-related variables | GC-related variables | |||||
| Presence of GC-related AEs, n (%) | 18 (64.3) | 30 (68.2) | 0.732 | 13 (81.3) | 35 (62.5) | 0.161 |
| Number of GC-related AEs, n (%) | 2.0 (1.0-3.0) | 1.0 (1.0-3.0) | 0.272 | 3.0 (2.0-3.8) | 2.0 (1.0-3.0) | 0.002* |
| Severe infections, n (%) | 3 (10.7) | 3 (6.8) | 0.672 | 2 (12.5) | 4 (7.1) | 0.609 |
| GTI | 29.5 (10.0-80.5) | 49.0 (19.0-75.0) | 0.420 | 61.0 (20.5-84.5) | 30.0 (19.0-74.0) | 0.289 |
| CCI | 1.5 (1.0-3.8) | 1.0 (1.0-3.0) | 0.773 | 2.0 (1.0-3.8) | 1.0 (1.0-3.0) | 0.386 |
| Cumulative prednisone dose, mg | 13,887.03 ± 1,304.93 | 13,421.02 ± 1,040.81 | 0.781 | 14,594.46 ± 1,273.43 | 12,933.08 ± 1,045.68 | 0.902 |
Associations between TAK features, outcomes and GC-related variables with NR3C1 polymorphisms carriage.
AEs, Adverse events; bDMARD, Biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index; GC, Glucocorticoid; GTI, Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index; n, Number of patients; TADS, Takayasu arteritis Damage Score; TAK, Takayasu arteritis; *, Flags significant results. The mean cumulative dose of prednisone was adjusted to the duration of therapy.
For specific GC-related AEs as defined by the GTI, such as worsening lipid profile, exacerbation of hypertension, worsening glucose tolerance, deterioration of BMD, weight gain, cataracts, and skin lesions, only 9β carriers had a higher frequency of weight gain than non-carriers (37.5% vs. 8.9%; p = 0.012) (Supplementary Table S5). No other significant differences were found concerning the carriage of other polymorphisms (i.e., rs11119328 of HSD11B1, rs1360780 of FKBP5 and BclI of NR3C1) and specific GC-related AEs (Supplementary Tables S5, S6).
Due to the low frequencies of ER22/23EK and N363S polymorphisms among TAK patients, no further analyses were performed for TAK features, outcomes and GC-related AEs.
NR3C1 gene haplotypes in TAK patients
Table 4 compares the outcomes of TAK and GC-related AEs among TAK patients carrying HT1, HT2, and HT3 of the NR3C1 gene. Despite significant differences in the median number of GC-related AEs among HTs (p = 0.032), we only found a tendency for a higher median number of GC-related AEs in carriers of HT3 compared to the carriers of HT1 and HT2 (p = 0.025 and p = 0.020; respectively) (Bonferroni’s correction – p = 0.016) in the post-hoc analyses. For specific GC-related AEs (Supplementary Table S7), only a tendency for a higher frequency of weight gain was observed in HT3 compared to HT1 carriers (33.3% vs. 0.0%; p = 0.028) in the post-hoc analysis. No differences were found between HT2 and HT3 carriers regarding weight gain (9.1% vs. 33.3%; p > 0.05). No other significant differences were observed among HT1, HT2 and HT3 carriers (Table 4, Supplementary Table S7).
Table 4
| Variables | HT1 (n=16) | HT2 (n=12) | HT3 (n=12) | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAK features and outcomes | ||||
| Subclavian steal syndrome, n (%) | 3 (18.8) | 2 (16.7) | 3 (25.0) | 0.867 |
| Renovascular hypertension, n (%) | 6 (37.5) | 4 (33.3) | 3 (25.0) | 0.781 |
| Pulmonary artery involvement, n (%) | 2 (12.5) | 1 (8.3) | 4 (33.3) | 0.217 |
| Angiographic type V, n (%) | 14 (87.5) | 9 (75.0) | 9 (75.0) | 0.626 |
| Ischemic events, n (%) | 5 (31.3) | 2 (16.7) | 4 (33.3) | 0.599 |
| Sustained remission, n (%) | 8 (50.0) | 9 (75.0) | 6 (50.0) | 0.342 |
| Progression of arterial lesions, n (%) | 8 (50.0) | 6 (50.0) | 6 (50.0) | 1.000 |
| Need for bDMARD therapy, n (%) | 8 (50.0) | 6 (50.0) | 6 (50.0) | 1.000 |
| TADS | 3.5 (2.8-6.0) | 4.0 (3.0-6.8) | 5.0 (2.5-9.0) | 0.586 |
| GC-related variables | ||||
| GC-related adverse events, n (%) | 9 (60.0) | 7 (63.6) | 9 (75.0) | 0.705 |
| Number of adverse events | 1.5 (1.0-2.8) | 1.5 (1.0-2.3) | 3.0 (2.0-3.0) | 0.032* |
| Severe infections, n (%) | 3 (20.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (16.7) | 0.300 |
| GTI Score | 82.5 (16.8-99.5) | 24.0 (10.0-48.0) | 50.0 (20.5-89.0) | 0.119 |
| CCI Score | 1.0 (1.0-2.0) | 2.0 (1.0-4.0) | 1.5 (1.0-2.8) | 0.711 |
| Cumulative dose of prednisone, mg | 13,527.24 ± 1,972.50 | 15,556.91 ± 2,314.90 | 15,325.06 ± 2,201.36 | 0.754 |
Comparisons among patients carrying different NR3C1 haplotypes.
bDMARD, Biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index; GC, Glucocorticoid; GTI, Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index; HT, Haplotype; n, number of patients; TADS, Takayasu arteritis Damage Score; *, Flags significant results. The mean cumulative dose of prednisone was adjusted to the duration of therapy.
Predictors of ischemic arterial events in patients with TAK
We built multivariate logistic regression models to analyze predictors of acute ischemic events and stable disease (i.e., no disease relapses or progression of arterial lesions) in TAK. In the regression models, we evaluated one of the following polymorphisms: rs11119328 of HSD11B1, rs1360780 of FKBP5 and BclI of NR3C1 gene with other relevant independent variables.
In the regression models for acute ischemic events, we included sustained remission, bDMARD use, vascular interventions, worsening glucose tolerance, GC-induced hyperlipidemia, worsening systemic hypertension, progression of arterial lesions and each polymorphism as independent variables. In all the regression models, worsening glucose tolerance was an independent risk factor for acute ischemic events in TAK. However, in the regression model with the 9β polymorphism of NR3C1, both worsening glucose tolerance and 9β carriage were predictors of acute ischemic events in TAK (Table 5).
Table 5
| Variables | OR | 95% CI | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSD11B1 rs11119328 model | |||
| rs1119328 | 0.685 | 0.204-2.307 | 0.542 |
| Sustained remission | 0.656 | 0.180-2.398 | 0.524 |
| bDMARDs | 2.085 | 0.652-6.671 | 0.215 |
| Vascular interventions | 1.102 | 0.292-4.163 | 0.886 |
| Worsening glucose tolerance | 8.928 | 2.132-37.391 | 0.003* |
| GC-induced hyperlipidemia | 0.595 | 0.174-2.032 | 0.407 |
| Worsening hypertension | 0.543 | 0.165-1.785 | 0.314 |
| Progression of arterial lesions | 0.518 | 0.155-1.733 | 0.286 |
| FKBP5 rs1360780 model | |||
| rs1360780 | 0.785 | 0.250-2.465 | 0.679 |
| Sustained remission | 0.565 | 0.149-2.140 | 0.401 |
| bDMARDs | 2.184 | 0.666-7.164 | 0.198 |
| Vascular interventions | 1.251 | 0.318-4.931 | 0.749 |
| Worsening glucose tolerance | 9.503 | 2.220-40.676 | 0.002* |
| GC-induced hyperlipidemia | 0.643 | 0.181-2.287 | 0.495 |
| Worsening hypertension | 0.583 | 0.177-1.924 | 0.376 |
| Progression of arterial lesions | 0.504 | 0.146-1.745 | 0.280 |
| NR3C1 BclI | |||
| BclI | 1.014 | 0.325-3.164 | 0.981 |
| Sustained remission | 0.639 | 0.174-2.342 | 0.499 |
| bDMARDs | 1.974 | 0.627-6.216 | 0.245 |
| Vascular interventions | 1.132 | 0.296-4.327 | 0.856 |
| Worsening glucose tolerance | 9.287 | 2.223-38.793 | 0.002* |
| GC-induced hyperlipidemia | 0.585 | 0.167-2.054 | 0.403 |
| Worsening hypertension | 0.545 | 0.167-1.775 | 0.313 |
| Progression of arterial lesions | 0.500 | 0.149-1.675 | 0.261 |
| NR3C1 9β | |||
| 9β | 4.371 | 1.042-18.341 | 0.044* |
| Sustained remission | 0.863 | 0.225-3.314 | 0.830 |
| bDMARDs | 2.102 | 0.636-6.952 | 0.223 |
| Vascular interventions | 1.335 | 0.343-5.201 | 0.677 |
| Worsening glucose tolerance | 10.227 | 2.295-45.581 | 0.002* |
| GC-induced hyperlipidemia | 0.354 | 0.085-1.474 | 0.354 |
| Worsening hypertension | 0.618 | 0.179-2.139 | 0.448 |
| Progression of arterial lesions | 0.622 | 0.177-2.191 | 0.448 |
Logistic regression models to evaluate predictors for acute ischemic events in TAK.
95% CI, 95% Confidence interval; bDMARD, Biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug; GC, Glucocorticoid; OR, Odds ratio; *, Flags significant results.
In the models analyzing predictors for stable disease in TAK, we added methylprednisolone use, bDMARDs, sustained remission, vascular interventions, acute ischemic events, angiographic type V and each polymorphism as independent variables. In these regression models, no polymorphisms were predictors of stable disease. In all but one regression model, sustained remission was associated with stable disease in TAK, and in one of the regression models, the use of bDMARDs was inversely associated with stable disease (Table 6).
Table 6
| Variables | OR | 95% CI | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSD11B1 rs11119328 model | |||
| rs1119328 | 0.899 | 0.281-2.878 | 0.858 |
| IV methylprednisolone pulse therapy | 2.894 | 0.697-12.021 | 0.144 |
| bDMARDs | 0.274 | 0.070-1.068 | 0.062 |
| Sustained remission | 3.395 | 1.006-11.458 | 0.049* |
| Vascular interventions | 1.038 | 0.305-3.527 | 0.953 |
| Acute ischemic events | 1.342 | 0.410-4.394 | 0.626 |
| Angiographic type V | 0.629 | 0.188-2.101 | 0.451 |
| FKBP5 rs1360780 model | |||
| rs1360780 | 1.637 | 0.534-5.021 | 0.389 |
| IV methylprednisolone pulse therapy | 2.934 | 0.718-11.993 | 0.134 |
| bDMARDs | 0.304 | 0.079-1.172 | 0.084 |
| Sustained remission | 3.256 | 0.938-11.306 | 0.063 |
| Vascular interventions | 1.037 | 0.291-3.690 | 0.956 |
| Acute ischemic events | 1.320 | 0.379-4.594 | 0.663 |
| Angiographic type V | 0.568 | 0.167 -1.928 | 0.364 |
| NR3C1 BclI | |||
| BclI | 1.688 | 0.541-5.265 | 0.367 |
| IV methylprednisolone pulse therapy | 3.130 | 0.762-12.857 | 0.113 |
| bDMARDs | 0.257 | 0.068-0.975 | 0.046* |
| Sustained remission | 3.611 | 1.057-12.332 | 0.040* |
| Vascular interventions | 1.012 | 0.294-3.475 | 0.985 |
| Acute ischemic events | 1.319 | 0.400-4.346 | 0.649 |
| Angiographic type V | 0.590 | 0.174-1.999 | 0.397 |
| NR3C1 9β | |||
| 9β | 1.213 | 0.319-4.606 | 0.777 |
| IV methylprednisolone pulse therapy | 2.906 | 0.707-11.939 | 0.139 |
| bDMARDs | 0.270 | 0.071-1.024 | 0.054 |
| Sustained remission | 3.486 | 1.007-12.067 | 0.049* |
| Vascular interventions | 1.034 | 0.303-3.528 | 0.957 |
| Acute ischemic events | 1.282 | 0.374-4.393 | 0.693 |
| Angiographic type V | 0.645 | 0.190-2.192 | 0.483 |
Logistic regression models to evaluate predictors for stable disease in TAK.
95% CI, 95% Confidence interval; bDMARD, Biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug; GC, Glucocorticoid; OR, Odds ratio; *, Flags significant results.
Discussion
In this study, the carriage of 9β and worsening glucose tolerance were independent risk factors for acute arterial ischemic events in TAK. In addition, 9β carriers were associated with a higher median number of GC-related AEs compared to non-carriers. No significant associations were found between the “other” polymorphisms of NR3C1, FKBP5, and HSD11B1 genes and TAK features or outcomes. None of the polymorphisms of NR3C1, FKBP5, and HSD11B1 genes, besides 9β, were associated with GC-related AEs. No significant associations were found between NR3C1 HTs and TAK features, outcomes and GC-related AEs. None of the polymorphisms of NR3C1, FKBP5, and HSD11B1 were predictors of stable disease (i.e., no angiographic progression).
This is the first study to evaluate the frequencies of the polymorphisms of the NR3C1, FKBP5, and HSD11B1 genes in TAK and their associations with TAK features, outcomes, and GC-related AEs. We assessed whether, from a genetic point of view, GC sensitivity had any impact on TAK outcomes. Patients presenting decreased GC sensitivity required higher daily prednisone doses than usual to control disease activity, resulting in a higher burden of GC-related AEs, whereas patients presenting increased GC sensitivity required lower daily prednisone doses to control disease activity, possibly leading to a lower risk of developing AEs ().
TAK therapy is based on long-term use of GC, resulting in high cumulative GC doses and the development of GC-related AEs (). Furthermore, acute ischemic arterial events, mainly involving the cerebral and coronary territories, are common complications of TAK (). Therefore, the evaluation of polymorphisms in the NR3C1, FKBP5 and HSD11B1 genes and their associations with clinical outcomes of TAK patients is of paramount importance for clinical practice. The carriage of specific polymorphisms indicates susceptibility to increased GC toxicity or a favorable therapeutic response.
The 9β polymorphism is associated with decreased GC sensitivity (), which in theory may be related to poor control of disease activity upon GC therapy and hypothetically may lead to an increased risk of progression of arterial lesions and development of ischemic events. Therefore, the need for longer and higher GC doses to control disease activity may result in a higher frequency of GC-related AEs. This assumption aligns with the findings of our cohort, as 9β carriers had a higher median number of AEs and more frequent weight gain. Furthermore, 9β carriage was an independent risk factor for developing acute ischemic arterial events in patients with TAK, regardless of the risk factors for coronary artery disease.
In the literature, carriage of the 9β variant has been reported to be associated with systemic inflammatory conditions. The 9β variant has been shown to increase the chance of developing rheumatoid arthritis (). In ANCA-associated vasculitis, this NR3C1 variant is associated with an increased mortality rate and a higher chance of end-stage renal disease (). This evidence points to poor control of the inflammatory process associated with the carriage of the 9β polymorphism, despite therapy. In addition, TAK patients present metabolic syndrome more frequently than healthy controls and the excessive number of risk factors for cardiovascular disease may be a confounding factor when analyzing the influence of 9β on acute arterial ischemic events (, ). Nonetheless, the carriage of 9β polymorphism and worsening glucose tolerance were independent predictors of this severe complication in our study. It has been reported that HT3 of the NR3C1 gene, which contains the 9β polymorphism, is related to increased cardiovascular risk with increased inflammatory cytokines and carotid intima-media thickening in the general population (). Conversely, a study of a multiethnic population in the Netherlands did not find any associations between 9β carriage and the age of onset of diabetes or metabolic parameters ().
The NR3C1 polymorphisms N363S, BclI, and 9β and their relationships with disease activity parameters were evaluated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The carriage of the minor allele of BclI or N363S (i.e., both increase GC sensitivity) was associated with lower baseline levels of disease activity (). Conversely, the carriage of BclI increased the frequency of central nervous system manifestations, especially psychiatric symptoms, in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus ().
Since the NR3C1 gene is very polymorphic, it is worth mentioning that the carriage of polymorphisms with antagonist functions may result in nullified effects on GC sensitivity. Therefore, haplotypic analysis of the NR3C1 gene may be more relevant compared to the analyses of individual polymorphisms. In our study, we evaluated only three haplotypes of the NR3C1 gene (i.e., HT1, HT2 and HT3) since the frequencies of the other HTs, such as HT4 and HT5, were too low for further analyses. HT3 carriage encompasses the combination of the polymorphisms 9ß and TthIII1 in the NR3C1 gene. The carriage of HT3 in TAK patients led to a trend for more frequent GC-related AEs compared to the carriage of other HTs, and a trend for a higher frequency of weight gain than HT1 carriage. The similarity of findings in the analysis of HT3 and the 9ß polymorphism indicates that the intronic variant Tthlll1 had little effect on the GC-decreased sensitivity exerted by 9ß. Indeed, the carriage of the polymorphism 9β was an independent risk factor for acute ischemic events in TAK patients. In all logistic regression models evaluating predictors of ischemic events in TAK, worsening glucose tolerance, as described by the GTI, was an independent risk factor for acute ischemic arterial events. This is in line with the evidence in the literature that diabetes is a major risk factor for acute ischemic events in the general population ().
The variants BclI and N363S in the NR3C1 gene are associated with increased sensitivity to GC, whereas 9β and ER22/23EK polymorphisms are associated with a decreased GC sensitivity (). In this study, the most frequent polymorphisms of the NR3C1 gene among TAK patients were BclI and 9β, which have antagonist effects regarding GC sensitivity. This is in line with previous reports in the literature, where the frequencies of the minor alleles in these polymorphisms in the dbSNP database vary from 16 to 36% and from 1 to 24%, respectively (, ). On the other hand, the rare NR3C1 polymorphisms, described in 0-3% of individuals in databases that include data on Brazil, were infrequent among TAK patients, since only 3 individuals were carriers of the ER22/23EK polymorphism and only one patient had the N363S polymorphism (, ). The frequency of the minor allele in the intronic variant TthIII1 was 41.3% in TAK patients. This finding is consistent with the wide range of frequencies (1.9-60.7%) reported for different populations ().
The minor allele of the rs11119328 polymorphism in the HSD11B1 gene is associated with a decreased expression of the 11βHD1 enzyme and lower conversion of inactive cortisone into active cortisol. Theoretically, rs11119328 polymorphism, which has been studied in a few disorders, induces poor disease control in patients with systemic inflammatory diseases, and it has been studied in a few disorders. In ANCA-associated vasculitis, the carriage of rs11119328 minor allele was associated with a higher risk of disease relapse (). Furthermore, kidney transplant patients presenting chronic rejection had upregulation of the cortisol-activating HSD11B1 gene, indicating an unmet cortisol demand in chronic kidney transplant rejection. Conversely, lower 11βHD1 activity after discontinuing infliximab use in Crohn’s disease, increased the risk of mid/long-term clinical relapse (, ). In our study, the carriage of the rs11119328 A allele had no impact on disease features and outcomes of patients with TAK, as well as on GC-related AEs.
FKBP5 is a polymorphic gene that encodes the protein FKBP5, a co-chaperone protein of the GC receptor (). Most studies evaluating genetic variants of FKBP5 focused mainly on its relations with psychiatric diseases. The FKBP5 polymorphism of interest in our study was rs1360780, and even though it was found at a high frequency (55.7%) in TAK patients, no significant associations were found with TAK features and outcomes, as well as with GC-related AEs (, ). In a related study, no association was observed between rs1360780 and clinical outcomes in idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (). However, rs1360780 carriage has already been described as a risk factor for bronchial asthma (). No studies, besides ours, have described associations between rs1360780 carriage and outcomes in systemic inflammatory diseases.
Our study has its strengths and limitations. The main strengths are the long-term follow-up of TAK patients and the use of the Sanger technique, which increases precision in detecting genetic variants, for genotyping the polymorphisms of interest. The main limitations of the study are its single-center retrospective design, which is subject to recall bias, and the relatively small number of TAK patients included which limit generalizability of the results. The latter may be due to the rarity of the disease in Brazil (). Additionally, limitations of this study include the absence of a control group and body mass index data of the participants.
In conclusion, 9β was the only polymorphism of the NR3C1 gene to present significant associations in TAK in this cohort, as its carriage led to a higher frequency of GC-related AEs and weight gain. Worsening glucose tolerance and 9β in the NR3C1 gene carriage were independent risk factors for acute ischemic events in TAK in our patient population. None of the other variants of the NR3C1, HSD11B1 and FKBP5 gene were associated with clinical outcomes or GC-related AEs in TAK.
Statements
Data availability statement
The data supporting the results of this study will be made available by the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Ethics statement
The study involved humans and was approved by Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa da UNIFESP (CAAE: 45377121.5.0000.5505). The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
FP: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization. AS: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. EZ: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. GK: Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. AS: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the FAPE (Fundo de Apoio a Pesquisa e Ensino) from the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology and by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo – FAPESP (Grant Nr. 2021/12331-8).
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Prof. João Pesquero, Beatriz Ribeiro Nogueira, and Joyce Pinto Yamamoto for their contributions to the development of this work. The authors are grateful to Debashish Danda for granting permission to use TADS, as well as Martha Stone (Veritas, LLC) for providing GTI training and a no-fee license.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1675026/full#supplementary-material
References
1
De SouzaAWSde CarvalhoJF. Diagnostic and classification criteria of Takayasu arteritis. J Autoimmun. (2014) 48–49:79–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2014.01.012
2
ArnaudLHarocheJMathianAGorochovGAmouraZ. Pathogenesis of Takayasu’s arteritis: A 2011 update. Autoimmun Rev. (2011) 11:61–7. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2011.08.001
3
de SouzaAWSSatoEIBranceMLFernández-ÁvilaDGScolnikMMagriSJet al. Pan american league of associations for rheumatology guidelines for the treatment of takayasu arteritis. J Clin Rheumatol. (2023) 29:316–25. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000002004
4
KeserGAksuK. What is new in management of Takayasu arteritis? Presse Med. (2017) 46:e229–35. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2016.11.033
5
KeserGDireskeneliHAksuK. Management of Takayasu arteritis: a systematic review. Rheumatol (Oxford). (2014) 53:793–801. doi: 10.1093/RHEUMATOLOGY/KET320
6
PachecoRLLatorracaCDOCde SouzaAWSPachitoDVRieraR. Clinical interventions for Takayasu arteritis: A systematic review. Int J Clin Pract. (2017) 71(11). doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12993
7
SpiesCMStrehlCvan der GoesMCBijlsmaJWJButtgereitF. Glucocorticoids. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. (2011) 25:891–900. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2011.11.002
8
PalmowskiAButtgereitF. Reducing the toxicity of long-term glucocorticoid treatment in large vessel vasculitis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. (2020) 22(12):85. doi: 10.1007/S11926-020-00961-0
9
RellingMVEvansWE. Pharmacogenomics in the clinic. Nature. (2015) 526:343–50. doi: 10.1038/NATURE15817
10
TanninGMAgarwalAKMonderCNewMIWhitePC. The human gene for 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase. Structure, tissue distribution, and chromosomal localization. J Biol Chem. (1991) 266:16653–8. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)55351-5
11
CzockDKellerFRascheFMHäusslerU. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of systemically administered glucocorticoids. Clin Pharmacokinet. (2005) 44:61–98. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200544010-00003
12
TomlinsonJWWalkerEABujalskaIJDraperNLaveryGGCooperMSet al. 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1: a tissue-specific regulator of glucocorticoid response. Endocr Rev. (2004) 25:831–66. doi: 10.1210/ER.2003-0031
13
HesselsACTuinJSandersJSFHuitemaMGVan RossumEFCKoperJWet al. Clinical outcome in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis and gene variants of 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 and the glucocorticoid receptor. Rheumatol (Oxford). (2019) 58:447–54. doi: 10.1093/RHEUMATOLOGY/KEY319
14
BinderEB. The role of FKBP5, a co-chaperone of the glucocorticoid receptor in the pathogenesis and therapy of affective and anxiety disorders. Psychoneuroendocrinology. (2009) 34 Suppl 1:S186–95. doi: 10.1016/J.PSYNEUEN.2009.05.021
15
ParianteCMThomasSALovestoneSMakoffAKerwinRW. Do antidepressants regulate how cortisol affects the brain? Psychoneuroendocrinology. (2004) 29:423–47. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2003.10.009
16
BreslinMBGengCDVedeckisWV. Multiple promoters exist in the human GR gene, one of which is activated by glucocorticoids. Mol Endocrinol. (2001) 15:1381–95. doi: 10.1210/MEND.15.8.0696
17
QuaxRAManenschijnLKoperJWHazesJMLambertsSWJVan RossumEFCet al. Glucocorticoid sensitivity in health and disease. Nat Rev Endocrinol. (2013) 9:670–86. doi: 10.1038/NRENDO.2013.183
18
Detera-wadleighSDEncioIJRollinsDYCoffmanDWieschD. A TthIII1 polymorphism on the 5’ flanking region of the glucocorticoid receptor gene (GRL). Nucleic Acids Res. (1991) 19:1960. doi: 10.1093/NAR/19.8.1960-A
19
Van RossumEFCRoksPHMDe JongFHBrinkmannAOPolsHAPKoperJWet al. Characterization of a promoter polymorphism in the glucocorticoid receptor gene and its relationship to three other polymorphisms. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). (2004) 61:573–81. doi: 10.1111/J.1365-2265.2004.02132.X
20
GraysonPCPonteCSuppiahRRobsonJCGribbonsKBJudgeAet al. 2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR classification criteria for Takayasu arteritis. Ann Rheum Dis. (2022) 81:1654–60. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-223482
21
HallWHRamachandranRNarayanSJaniABVijayakumarS. An electronic application for rapidly calculating Charlson comorbidity score. BMC Cancer. (2004) 4:94. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-4-94
22
MiloslavskyEMNadenRPBijlsmaJWJBroganPABrownESBrunettaPet al. Development of a Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (GTI) using multicriteria decision analysis. Ann Rheum Dis. (2017) 76:543–6. doi: 10.1136/ANNRHEUMDIS-2016-210002
23
ExleyARBaconPALuqmaniRAKitasGDGordonCSavageCOSet al. Development and initial validation of the Vasculitis Damage Index for the standardized clinical assessment of damage in the systemic vasculitides. Arthritis Rheum. (1997) 40:371–80. doi: 10.1002/ART.1780400222
24
GoelRKumarTSDandaDJosephGJeyaseelanVSurinAKet al. Childhood-onset Takayasu arteritis – experience from a tertiary care center in South India. J Rheumatol. (2014) 41:1183–9. doi: 10.3899/JRHEUM.131117
25
Peron FilhoFMoreiraADSJanesALFDe SouzaAWS. Effectiveness and safety of adalimumab compared with leflunomide in patients with Takayasu arteritis: a retrospective cohort study. RMD Open. (2024) 10(1):e003992. doi: 10.1136/RMDOPEN-2023-003992
26
StephensMSmithNJDonnellyP. A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am J Hum Genet. (2001) 68:978–89. doi: 10.1086/319501
27
HataANodaMMoriwakiRNumanoF. Angiographic findings of Takayasu arteritis: new classification. Int J Cardiol. (1996) 54 Suppl:S155–63. doi: 10.1016/S0167-5273(96)02813-6
28
KinoTChrousosGP. Tissue-specific glucocorticoid resistance-hypersensitivity syndromes: Multifactorial states of clinical importance. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2002) 109:609–13. doi: 10.1067/mai.2002.123708
29
Maksimowicz-McKinnonKHoffmanGS. Takayasu arteritis: what is the long-term prognosis? Rheumatic Dis Clinics North America. (2007) 33:777–86. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2007.07.014
30
KimHBarraL. Ischemic complications in Takayasu’s arteritis: A meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. (2018) 47:900–6. doi: 10.1016/J.SEMARTHRIT.2017.11.001
31
Van Den AkkerELTRusscherHVan RossumEFCBrinkmannAODe JongFHHokkenAet al. Brief report: Glucocorticoid receptor polymorphism affects transrepression but not transactivation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2006) 91:2800–3. doi: 10.1210/JC.2005-2119
32
Van OostenMJMDolhainRJEMKoperJWvan RossumEFCEmontsMHanKHet al. Polymorphisms in the glucocorticoid receptor gene that modulate glucocorticoid sensitivity are associated with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. (2010) 12(4):R159. doi: 10.1186/AR3118
33
Da SilvaTFMaurícioLNBonfáEPereiraRMR. High prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Takayasu arteritis: increased cardiovascular risk and lower adiponectin serum levels. J Rheumatol. (2013) 40:1897–904. doi: 10.3899/JRHEUM.130162
34
dos SantosAMMisseRGBorgesIBPGualanoBde SouzaAWSTakayamaLet al. Increased modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in patients with Takayasu arteritis: a multicenter cross-sectional study. Adv Rheumatol. (2021) 61(1):1. doi: 10.1186/S42358-020-00157-1
35
Van Den AkkerELTKoperJWVan RossumEFCDekkerMJHRusscherHDe JongFHet al. Glucocorticoid receptor gene and risk of cardiovascular disease. Arch Intern Med. (2008) 168:33–9. doi: 10.1001/ARCHINTERNMED.2007.41
36
AhdiMGerardsMCSmitsPHMMeestersEWBrandjesDPMNieuwdorpMet al. Genetic glucocorticoid receptor variants differ between ethnic groups but do not explain variation in age of diabetes onset, metabolic and inflammation parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2023) 14:1200183. doi: 10.3389/FENDO.2023.1200183
37
QuaxRAMKoperJWHuismanAMWeelAHazesJMWLambertsSWJet al. Polymorphisms in the glucocorticoid receptor gene and in the glucocorticoid-induced transcript 1 gene are associated with disease activity and response to glucocorticoid bridging therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int. (2015) 35:1325–33. doi: 10.1007/S00296-015-3235-Z
38
BazsóASzappanosÁRásonyiRNagyEFarkasAVárnaiBet al. Polymorphisms of human glucocorticoid receptor gene in systemic lupus erythematosus: a single-centre result. Clin Rheumatol. (2019) 38:1979–84. doi: 10.1007/S10067-019-04478-5
39
YangZJLiuJGeJPChenLZhaoZGYangWY. Prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factor in the Chinese population: the 2007–2008 China National Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders Study. Eur Heart J. (2012) 33:213–20. doi: 10.1093/EURHEARTJ/EHR205
40
KoperJWVan RossumEFCVan Den AkkerELT. Glucocorticoid receptor polymorphisms and haplotypes and their expression in health and disease. Steroids. (2014) 92:62–73. doi: 10.1016/J.STEROIDS.2014.07.015
41
rs41423247 RefSNP Report - dbSNP - NCBI. Available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/rs41423247 (Accessed March 27, 2023).
42
rs6190 RefSNP Report - dbSNP - NCBI. Available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/rs6190 (Accessed March 27, 2023).
43
rs6189 RefSNP Report - dbSNP - NCBI. Available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/rs6189 (Accessed March 27, 2023).
44
rs56149945 RefSNP Report - dbSNP - NCBI. Available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/rs56149945 (Accessed March 27, 2023).
45
rs10052957 RefSNP Report - dbSNP - NCBI. Available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/rs10052957 (Accessed December 20, 2024).
46
ChristakoudiSRunglallMMobilloPRebollo-MesaITsuiTLNova-LampertiEet al. Steroid regulation: An overlooked aspect of tolerance and chronic rejection in kidney transplantation. Mol Cell Endocrinol. (2018) 473:205–16. doi: 10.1016/J.MCE.2018.01.021
47
PierreNHuynh-ThuVAMarichalTAllezMBouhnikYLaharieDet al. Distinct blood protein profiles associated with the risk of short-term and mid/long-term clinical relapse in patients with Crohn’s disease stopping infliximab: when the remission state hides different types of residual disease activity. Gut. (2023) 72:443–50. doi: 10.1136/GUTJNL-2022-327321
48
ZannasASBinderEB. Gene-environment interactions at the FKBP5 locus: sensitive periods, mechanisms and pleiotropism. Genes Brain Behav. (2014) 13:25–37. doi: 10.1111/GBB.12104
49
MendonçaMSMangiavacchiPMRiosÁFL. Regulatory functions of FKBP5 intronic regions associated with psychiatric disorders. J Psychiatr Res. (2021) 143:1–8. doi: 10.1016/J.JPSYCHIRES.2021.08.014
50
LaoWFangMYangX. FK506-binding protein 51 (FKBP5) gene polymorphism is not associated with glucocorticoid therapy outcome in patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Mol Med Rep. (2012) 6:787–90. doi: 10.3892/MMR.2012.993
51
AlsaffarSFRasheedHAYenzeelJHGhaziHF. The association of FKBP5 polymorphism with asthma susceptibility in asthmatic patients. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. (2021) 32:479–84. doi: 10.1515/JBCPP-2020-0450
52
VieiraMOchtropMLGSztajnbokFSouto Oliveira EliasCVerztmanJFBicaBERGet al. The epidemiology of takayasu arteritis in rio de janeiro, Brazil: A large population-based study. J Clin Rheumatol. (2023) 29:E100–3. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000001964
Summary
Keywords
Takayasu arteritis, glucocorticoids, drug toxicity, single nucleotide polymorphism, genetic studies
Citation
Peron Filho F, de Souza Moreira A, Zarur EB, Keppeke GD and de Souza AWS (2025) Gene variants of glucocorticoid activation pathways and the outcomes of patients with Takayasu arteritis – a retrospective cohort study. Front. Immunol. 16:1675026. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1675026
Received
28 July 2025
Accepted
15 September 2025
Published
02 October 2025
Volume
16 - 2025
Edited by
Alessandro Tomelleri, San Raffaele Hospital (IRCCS), Italy
Reviewed by
Elvis Hysa, Università di Genova, Italy
Vera Podzolkova, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Russia
Caterina Ricordi, IRCCS Local Health Authority of Reggio Emilia, Italy
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Peron Filho, de Souza Moreira, Zarur, Keppeke and de Souza.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Alexandre Wagner Silva de Souza, alexandre_wagner@uol.com.br
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.