Microbial interventions in rice rhizosphere engineering: from soil microbiome manipulation to yield stability

Abstract

Microbial interventions in the rice rhizosphere are emerging as a promising strategy to enhance crop productivity and resilience under increasing climatic stress. The rhizosphere is a dynamic interface where plant roots interact with complex microbial communities that drive nutrient cycling, resistance to abiotic and biotic stresses. Recent developments have redirected interest toward synthetic microbial consortia (SynComs) to supplement single-strain plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) by combining complementary functional capabilities to enhance nutrient acquisition, regulate phytohormone signaling and architecture of the root system. The review is a critical synthesis of existing information on rhizosphere engineering in rice which combines mechanistic understanding of root exudate-mediated microbial recruitment, quorum sensing, and multi-omics-elucidated functional pathways. There is evidence that SynComs have the potential to improve the efficiency of nitrogen and phosphorus utilization, and improve stress tolerance in the plants, but these effects are usually obtained in controlled settings and exhibit inconsistent reproducibility in the field. Microbial competition with naturally occurring communities, environmental heterogeneity, and difficulty in maintaining consortia stability at scale, are considered as key constraints. The review also assesses new uses in the pathogen suppression via induced systemic resistance and microbial volatile signaling, and industrial-scale manufacturing plans, such as bioreactor optimization and formulation technologies such as encapsulation. Regulatory and ecological aspects, such as biosafety and long-term effects on native microbiomes are also addressed. This work offers a balanced point of view of the opportunities and challenges of microbiome engineering in rice systems by connecting molecular and translational and field-level challenges. It emphasizes the necessity of integrative strategies that can merge microbial design, host genetics and precision agriculture to attain climate-resilient and sustainable crop production.

Graphical Abstract

1 Introduction

Rhizosphere microbiome control is becoming one of the central approaches to precision agriculture in modern crop science geared toward adjusting crop-microbe interactions to maximize crop performance in environmental stress (Wang and Kuzyakov, 2024). The rhizosphere is a biologically active zone where plants and microorganisms interact intensively through nutrient exchange and chemical signaling. In this microenvironment, the microbial assemblages perform the crucial biogeochemical functions such as fixation of nitrogen, solubilization of phosphorus, and methane cycling that have a direct effect on the health of plants and soil fertility (Islam et al., 2024; Kwon et al., 2024). In the past, agricultural techniques viewed the microbiome in the soil as a fixed resource; innovations reinvent it as an engineerable ecosystem where certain microbial taxa can be recruited or suppressed to meet particular objectives, including improved nutrient cycling or reduction of greenhouse gases (Kwon et al., 2024; Wang and Kuzyakov, 2024). With the help of genomics, metabolomics, and high-throughput sequencing, precision rhizosphere engineering takes a proactive approach in the control of microbial community structure, instead of depending on broad-spectrum biofertilizers (Kwon et al., 2024; Islam et al., 2024).

The early history of plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria(PGPR) use in rice was mainly done through inoculation of isolated isolates (Rhizobium and Azospirillum spp.) to promote the availability of nitrogen and root development (Islam et al., 2024). As an example, Rhizobium strains inoculation showed a yield growth of between 8 percent and 22 percent on controlled conditions in comparison to unfertilized controls (Islam et al., 2024). On the same note, the cyanobacteria, including Anabaena, present in the Azolla ecosystem, provided up to 40 kg N ha^-1 of fixed nitrogen biomass in 20–25 days, considerably supplementing the nutritional needs of the rice crop (Islam et al., 2024). Nevertheless, the extrapolation of these advantages to the conditions of variable fields showed uneven performance, which triggered the transition to engineered microbial consortia that can have a synergistic effect on plants (Islam et al., 2024). This shift is part of a larger trend of microbial ecology: single-strain applications being replaced by multispecies assemblies that take advantage of functional complementation between taxa to handle complex problems, such as nutrient cycling, stress resistance, and pathogen suppression (Islam et al., 2024). Manipulation of microbial recruitment through microbial signaling pathways, in which plant exudates selectively assemble rhizosphere communities, is also a modern intervention type (Islam et al., 2024; Yang et al., 2025). As an example, several studies showed that root exudates have the potential to recruit desirable Proteobacteria and Verrucomicrobia relative abundance in rice rhizospheres, indicating that root chemistry can be targeted to recruit taxa with desirable functions (Yang, 2024). The replacement of single-strain inoculants with engineered microbial consortia is one of the breakthroughs in the engineering of the rice rhizosphere. Initial methods used the concept of isolated PGPR to provide basic nutrient supplementation, whereas current synthetic communities can take advantage of functional complementarity, synergistic signaling, and increased ecological stability to provide more predictable and robust growth promotion of plants in various field conditions (Table 1).

Table 1 illustrates the clear evolutionary trend from single-strain inoculants toward functionally complex consortia, although challenges related to strain compatibility and field stability persist.

Oryza sativa L. (rice) is the staple food of over 1.5 billion people worldwide and the major source of calories in Asia and some sections of Africa. Although this is the basis, climate-based stresses, including drought, salinity, and changes in temperatures, are increasing as a threat to rice production (Islam et al., 2024). In addition, rice farming is also a major source of methane (CH₄) emission since the anaerobic processes of microbes in flooded paddies, and Rice paddies are estimated to contribute approximately 8–12% of global anthropogenic methane emissions, although this value varies depending on water management practices, soil type, and climatic conditions (Kwon et al., 2024). Since methane is estimated to be 25 times more effective at global warming compared to CO₂, it is a climate and food security concern to reduce its emissions (Kwon et al., 2024). Currently, rhizosphere engineering has been proposed as a strategy to modulate methanogenic and methanotrophic microbial populations, although quantitative evidence demonstrating consistent methane reduction under field conditions remains limited. In favor of methanotrophs or other constituents that diminish CH₄ flux, thereby, at the same time, increasing the environmental sustainability and crop performance. The identification and manipulation of microbial taxa involved in cycling CH₄ in rice rhizospheres is a twofold intervention that meets climate reduction and productivity objectives. Moreover, genotype-specific disparities in rhizosphere community composition offer the basis to establish rice cultivars that attract desirable microbes during stressful situations, including drought or salinity, strengthening the ability to endure unfavorable situations (Islam et al., 2024; Yang, 2024).

Other greenhouse gas interactions, like nitrous oxide (N₂O), related to the nitrogen cycle, also involve rice. Recently discovered studies show that domesticated rice can change rhizosphere microbiome in a manner that reduces the division of nitrogen-fixing abilities and raises N₂O emission in tropical soils, highlighting the necessity to design microbiomes that maximize nutrient balancing and have little adverse ecological effects (Chang et al., 2025). This indicates the urgency of incorporating the concept of rhizosphere engineering in breeding and management of rice to continue food production in the world with a changing climate. Unlike other reviews, which have aimed to pinpoint single-scale syntheses, the review offers a multi-scale synthesis that explicitly connects molecular mechanisms (root exudates, quorum sensing, and multi-omics pathways), microbial community dynamics, industrial formulation and scale-up issues, regulatory factors, and field-level ecological risks in rice systems. In contrast to previous reviews that mostly concentrate on either microbial processes or agronomic performance, the work represents a balance between basic science and practical implementation limitations, and does not lose sight of the potential and ongoing limitations of microbiome engineering to climate-resistant rice production.

2 Literature selection methodology

To make the review systematic but narrative, a literature review was carried out to help the review to be transparent and reproducible. Relevant works were found due to extensive searches in Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar in the following combinations of keywords: “rice rhizosphere microbiome”, Synthetic microbial consortia OR S SynComs, “PGPR rice”, biofertilizers rice, methane mitigation rice rhizosphere, and plant-microbe interactions rice. The articles were published in 2015-2026 (considered strongly preferable to 2020 and later). The inclusion criteria included those studies that were directly related to rice systems, microbial mechanisms in the rhizosphere, SynCom design, field or greenhouse validation, or multi-omics applications. Original research and review articles were both taken into consideration to offer balanced mechanistic and applied information. The exclusion criteria were non-peer-reviewed papers, non-English papers, articles that were not experimentally validated, and articles that were not specifically targeted at understanding rice rhizosphere processes. Preference was given to articles that provided mechanistic information, validation of the field, or combination of multi-omics. Despite the fact that this is a narrative review, the selection bias was eliminated as much as possible through cross-referencing various databases and the inclusion of opposing findings (e.g., successful vs. inconsistent field outcomes).

3 Core mechanisms of beneficial microbial interactions in the rice rhizosphere

3.1 Advanced signaling pathways and root exudate engineering for selective microbiome recruitment

Chemical signaling networks that mediate the recruitment, recognition, and functional activation of microbial assemblages are the fundamental basis of beneficial plant-microbe interactions in the rice (Oryza sativa L.) rhizosphere (Wankhade et al., 2025). Root exudates of rice are complicated combinations of primary metabolites (e.g., sugars, amino acids, organic acids) and secondary metabolites (e.g., phenolics, flavonoids) that serve as chemoattractants, nutritional substrates, and signaling molecules to define microbial community composition and activity (Wankhade et al., 2025; Halshoy et al., 2025). These compounds are highly dynamic in cultivar/genotype, developmental, and environmental conditions, and affect the pattern of microbial recruitment on a significant scale (Thamizharasan et al., 2025). As an example, metabolomic profiling showed cultivar-specific exudate profiles such as hexadecanoic acid, propionic acid, and trans-3-hydroxycinnamic acid that differentiate the modulation of chemotaxis, biofilm formation, and colonization properties of the strain of the genus Bacillus, including Bacillus altitudinis FD48 and Pristia endophytica NE14. This modulation is in support of the idea that certain exudate compounds can up-regulate functional qualities (e.g., chemotaxis, cell wall-degrading enzyme activity), allowing specific rhizosphere engineering that allows the preferential favoring of beneficial microbes over opportunistic taxa (Thamizharasan et al., 2025). Root exudates control selective microbial recruitment and phytohormone signaling to promote rhizosphere microbiome assembly to increase rice resilience to stress (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Such chemical conversation is further fine-tuned by phytohormones: auxins, cytokinins, abscisic acid (ABA), salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), and ethylene (ET) determine the root architecture, and exudate profiles, and therefore modulate microbial recruitment to stresses (Wankhade et al., 2025; Halshoy et al., 2025). In particular, root ABA and SA concentrations are reported to change during abiotic stress, causing alterations in the secretion of organic acids and phenolic compounds, which attract specialized microbes that can increase the resilience to the stress. This exudation regulation by hormones points out a poorly recognized process through which plants can also actively design their rhizosphere to promote beneficial interactions, rather than passively providing nutrients.

3.2 Multifunctional roles of PGPR consortia in nutrient mobilization and hormonal crosstalk

The rhizobacteria that promote growth of plants (PGPR) are at the center of nutrient mobilization in the rice rhizosphere through various biochemical processes, which include nitrogen fixation, solubilization of phosphates, siderophores, and phytohormones (Wankhade et al., 2025; Thamizharasan et al., 2025). In addition to the use of single-strain inoculants, synthetic microbial consortia have been demonstrated to be more effective in increasing nutrient availability because of functional complementarity between members, allowing a certain concomitant manipulation of multiple nutrient pathways and stress responses. Indicatively, multi-species PGPR consortia were shown to increase the growth of rice under saline stress by complementing nutrient uptake and osmotic stress reduction, respectively, through enriching the metabolic pathways in the pool to include nucleotide metabolism, purine metabolism, and the functions of the ABC transporter, as compared to single strains (Wang et al., 2025). These consortium treatments have been connected to greater changes in rhizosphere community structure, with advantages to useful phyla such as Proteobacteria and Acidobacteriota, which are associated with enhanced plant physiological results (Wang et al., 2025).

Mechanically, the strains of PGPR are helpful in the provision of nutrients to the roots by performing synergistic activities. Production of siderophores changes the iron solubility and availability, and promotes iron uptake by plants in Fe-limiting soils (Wankhade et al., 2025). In the rhizosphere, phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) transform inorganic phosphates that are not readily accessible to plants into soluble forms through the secretion of organic acids and, therefore, can potentially enhance the efficiency of phosphorus uptake by up to 30-60% insofar as field conditions are concerned (Thamizharasan et al., 2025; Iftikhar et al., 2023). At the same time, numerous PGPR secrete indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and gibberellins that regulate the architecture of the root system by stimulating the formation of lateral roots and root hair, increasing the soil surface area to absorb nutrients and water (Wankhade et al., 2025). All these combined roles depict the fact that engineered consortia of PGPRs are not merely bio stimulants but bio-mobilization agents capable of regulating the physiological pathways to plant physiology and soil nutrient sequences.

3.3 Emerging insights into quorum-sensing-driven community assembly and stability

Quorum sensing (QS) is a type of intercellular signaling with cell-density dependence, or coordination. In Gram-negative systems, the production and sensing of signal molecules like N-acyl homoserine lactones (AHLs) are used to regulate collective behavior, whereas in Gram-positives, oligopeptides are produced and sensed by a system called quorum sensing. QS has gained wider acceptance as a contributor to community assembly, biofilm formation, motility, and generation of secondary metabolites, all of which are vital in stable and functional rhizosphere consortia. The abundance of different AHL-producing bacteria, such as Acinetobacter lactucae, Aeromonas popoffi, Serratia oryzae, and Rhizobium wuzhouense, in rice rhizospheres suggests that QS networks regulate the behavior of the bacteria that can enhance positive interactions in the changing environmental conditions (Misu et al., 2025).

New findings also demonstrate that QS also affects the structural organization of microbial communities to allow microbes to regulate gene expression as a collective response and adjust to population density and environmental signals (Misu et al., 2025; Deo et al., 2025). As an example, QS controls biofilm formation, which secures microbial consortia on root surfaces, and defends beneficial bacteria against abiotic stress factors. The biofilm matrices also play the role of a nutrient exchange and antagonistic hubs against pathogens. Interfering with quorum signaling has also been suggested both to control the pathogen and to optimize the benefits of beneficial community assembly, which suggests that QS manipulation is an avenue of breakthrough in rhizosphere engineering (Joshi et al., 2025).

In short, intricate signaling through root exudates, interaction among multifunctional PGPR, and QS-mediated communication are all the factors that control microbial recruitment, functionality, and community stability in rice rhizospheres. It has potential in the integration of these mechanistic understandings in the precision microbiome engineering to improve the nutritional use efficiency, stress tolerance, and sustainability of rice production.

4 Biofertilizers and biostimulants: innovative formulations for enhanced nutrient efficiency

4.1 Synthetic microbial consortia outperforming traditional inoculants in nitrogen and phosphorus acquisition

Conventional single-strain biofertilizers, which can be either azotobacter-based or phosphate-solubilizing bacteria, have been moderately effective in improving the nutrient uptake and yield of rice (Islam et al., 2024; Ma et al., 2024). Nonetheless, there is growing evidence that synthetic microbial consortia (SynComs), SynComs have been reported to outperform conventional inoculants in several controlled studies; however, their effectiveness is highly dependent on environmental conditions, soil characteristics, and plant genotype (Singh et al., 2025).

Recent research that isolated rhizosphere bacteria of rice in intercropping with soybean established a four-member SynCom of Variovorax paradoxus, Novosphingobium subterraneum, Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava, and Acidovorax sp. This SynCom contributed to a greater growth of rice biomass and P uptake during pot experiments compared to uninoculated controls, and this was mainly through the augmentation of soil available P and up-regulation of four Pi transporter genes (OsPht1;1, OsPht1;2, OsPht1;4, OsPht1;6) to enable root-to-shoot phosphorus translocation (Ma et al., 2024). Notably, the plants had higher surfaces and counts of roots, which are root characteristics directly associated with higher P acquisition efficiency. It is important to distinguish that most of these findings are derived from controlled pot or greenhouse experiments, and their direct translation to field-scale conditions remains uncertain. Synthetic microbial consortia are more effective than the traditional single-strain biofertilizer because they organize complementary metabolic pathways, which can effectively fix nitrogen levels, solubilize phosphorus, and respond to stresses at the same time. This versatility results in enhanced nutrient mobilization, enhanced expression of root genes, and enhanced nutrient-use efficiency, especially in nutrient-limited or stressful rice systems (Table 2).

Overall, Table 2 shows that SynComs frequently outperform single-strain inoculants under controlled conditions, particularly in phosphorus acquisition and root architecture modification, yet context-dependency remains evident.

Comparative analyses also indicate that multi-species consortia have a better ability to give consistent nutrient improvement compared to single-strain PGPRs when subjected to stress conditions. A consortium (T6) of rhizosphere bacteria caused wider metabolic pathway changes in salt-stress rice seedlings, particularly in the nucleotide and ABC metabolism transporter metabolic processes, compared to single inoculants and enhanced the biomass, photosynthetic efficiency, and antioxidative enzyme activity (Wang et al., 2025). Even though the majority of studies have been conducted on phosphorus uptake by rice, similar experiments on other cereals such as wheat have proved that consortia of PGPR can boost the yield of the grain by up to 63.9 percent under lower fertilizer application rates (75 percent of recommended) than the usual inoculated by single isolates or non-inoculated controls (Pradhan et al., 2025). These trends are highly indicative of the fact that functional complementarity between microbial taxa, including nitrogen fixation, phosphorus solubilization, phytohormone production, and antioxidation, is responsible for the observed improvement in nutrient use efficiency and plant performance compared to traditional inoculants (Singh et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2025).

Although synthetic microbial consortia (SynComs) have proven to perform well, their effectiveness compared to that of single-strain inoculants is not universal and is still context-dependent. Although SynComs provide functional complementarity and redundancy they tend to perform worse in field conditions because of variability in the environment, microbial competition and erratic establishment. Conversely, single-strain PGPR can be more predictable and stable in the ecology of some soils. Additionally, the complexity of consortia can also be increased, which may bring about antagonistic interactions and increased costs in the metabolism, which introduces a trade-off between functional diversification and community stability. Hence, a trade-off between complexity and ecological resilience is optimized in designing SynCom, especially when used in the field.

4.2 Bio stimulant-driven root architecture remodeling and yield-boosting traits

In addition to nutrient transformation per se, bio stimulants based on microbial consortia may trigger a modification of root architecture, further maximizing nutrient uptake in plants. Root system characteristics like surface area, total root length, root tip density, and lateral branching have a strong effect on the ability of a plant to explore soil resources and are strongly linked to the yield potential (Thamizharasan et al., 2025). The root morphological characteristics in SynCom-treated rice plants were high, and the phosphate transporter gene expression was also high, indicating that microbial stimulation and host physiological responses were closely interconnected (Ma et al., 2024).

The balance of phytohormones is also regulated with the help of PGPR strains and microbial bio stimulants, especially the generation of auxin (IAA), which helps to stimulate the lateral root development and the growth of root hairs. High levels of IAA caused by microbial inoculants promote nutrient-foraging capacity and plant growth in most plant systems (Wankhade et al., 2025). Consortia also promote the exudation of organic acids, which brings more soluble phosphorus and micronutrients otherwise immobile, particularly in acid soils, and is linked to the availability of more of these nutrients in the rhizosphere (Ma et al., 2024)s.

In addition, microbial bio stimulants have also been associated with increased chlorophyll content and photosynthetic efficiency during stress conditions, an activity that can be directly translated to more beneficial outcomes of grain filling and yield stability. Pre-treatment with microbial consortia produced a significant enhancement in enzymatic antioxidants (SOD, POD, CAT), Osmo protectants such as proline in salt-stressed rice seedlings, which reduced the oxidative damage and enhanced plant vigor in comparison to controls (Wang et al., 2025). These findings place an emphasis on the effects of microbial bio stimulants to enhance the plant tolerance mechanisms to stress, in addition to defining root physiology and nutrient acquisition pathways.

4.3 Integration of microbiome-shaping genes for heritable nutrient-use efficiency

The genetic contribution of microbiome-shaping genes (M genes) to the breeding of crops is a new frontier of sustainable crop improvement. Host loci, which are called M genes, alter the structure and composition of plant-associated microbiomes due to the allelic variation that may lead to an inherited enhancement of nutrient use efficiency and resilience (Cernava, 2024). Though a direct correlation of M genes and nutrient uptake in rice is still proving, the general literature on plant sciences on M genes is increasingly compelling evidence that host genetics may influence microbiomes with functional consequences that may be applicable to nutrient cycling.

According to a synthesis of the recent work by Tomislav Cernava, functional M gene breeding would enable rice varieties to attract microbial communities that enhance nutrient uptake, minimize reliance on agrochemicals, and have greater stress resistance (Cernava, 2024). As an example, the genetic material that improves nitrogen fixation by bacteria or P-solubilizing taxa in the rhizosphere would be experimentally selected, and this increase in bulk nutrient use efficiency would be passed on to subsequent generations (Cernava, 2024). These host-mediated interactions between microbiomes are reminiscent of the studies in other crops, where host genetic variation was demonstrated to influence microbial hubs, thereby affecting host fitness, which is probably also conserved in cereals (Thakur et al., 2023).

Although empirical evidence of the effects of M genes on the use of nutrients in rice is still scarce, the combination of host genetics with microbiome engineering is a promising interdisciplinary route. The growing body of genomic, microbiological, and agronomic data indicates that the joint application of optimized microbial consortia and host genotypes prone to adopting beneficial microbiomes has the potential to provide heritable and nutrient use efficiency and yield stability, a pertinent innovation to make rice production systems more sustainable. However, direct experimental validation of microbiome-shaping genes (M genes) in rice remains limited, and most current evidence is extrapolated from model plants or non-rice systems. Therefore, while the concept is promising, further empirical studies are required to establish its practical relevance in rice agroecosystems.

5 Pathogen-suppressive communities: next-generation biocontrol through rhizosphere redesign

5.1 Engineering antagonistic consortia for durable suppression of key rice pathogens

Pathogen-suppressive rhizosphere communities are also a shift in the paradigm of managing rice diseases that is no longer concerned with single-strain antagonists but instead offers engineered microbial consortia with a synergistic effect in reducing the initial colonization and growth of pathogens (Singh et al., 2025). The conventional methods of biocontrol have been very dependent on individual species like Bacillus subtilis, Trichoderma harzianum, or Pseudomonas fluorescens to suppress pathogens by antibiosis, siderophore, or nutrient competition (Singh et al., 2025). Nevertheless, such single-strain applications often do not demonstrate consistent results in the field of application because of their low ecological strength and the ability to be excluded by other native microbiota (Singh et al., 2025).

Non-rice systems studies have given evidence of the potential that synthetic microbial communities (SynComs) can suppress soil-borne diseases much more effectively than monocultures. As an illustration, a cross-kingdom SynCom (Trichoderma harzianum and various strains of Bacillus) lowered the severity of Fusarium crown rot disease by approximately 70% and stimulated plant growth because of the reconstruction of the rhizosphere microbiome composition and metabolic respiratory strength (Zhou et al., 2026). Even though this was conducted with wheat, the general practice of SynCom-mediated suppression of pathogens through microbiome rebalancing applies directly to rice systems that suffer major challenges due to the likes of Magnaporthe oryzae (blast), Xanthomonas oryzae (bacterial blight), and Rhizoctonia solani (sheath blight) (Zhou et al., 2026).

Other recent research in the field of rice microbiome engineering reported that the consortium of Pantoea ananatis and P. dispersa strains was successfully used to suppress leaf and panicle blast and showed significant induction of systemic defense responses and ROS accumulation, although the consortium did not exhibit extensive antagonism to pathogens in vitro (Sun et al., 2025). The outcomes imply that various, functionally diversified taxa acting together can cause long-lasting states of defense and decrease instances of diseases in the field conditions, thus demonstrating the potential of engineered antagonistic assemblies.

5.2 Induced systemic resistance via novel microbial volatile and metabolite networks

The rhizosphere concept of biocontrol not only deals with direct antagonistic interactions with pathogens, but the induction of systemic resistance (ISR) by beneficial microbes is possible when plants strengthen their systems as a reaction to microbial signaling. ISR operates based on a complex cross-talk of plant hormonal pathways, in most cases, with salicylic acid (SA) signals, jasmonic acid (JA), and ethylene (ET) signals, which lead to systemic priming against a wide range of pathogens (Maithani et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2022). For example, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Pseudomonas spp. have been shown to elicit ISR that enhances defense gene expression and confers broad-spectrum disease tolerance in various crops, and similar mechanisms are hypothesized to operate in rice (Pérez-Montaño et al., 2025).

Microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOCs) and other secondary metabolites play central roles in such systemic interactions. Although specific measurements in rice rhizospheres remain limited for 2022–2026, studies across plant systems show that VOC blends such as 2,3-butanediol, terpenes, and sulfur compounds can act as airborne signals that trigger plant defense responses systemically, suppressing pathogens far from the emission source (Thankappan et al., 2022). Microbial volatiles and metabolites trigger JA/ET-dependent hormonal crosstalk, priming ISR for broad-spectrum pathogen resistance in rice (Figure 2).

Figure 2

These complex microbial volatiles can modulate root and shoot immunity, and synergize with phytohormone pathways to establish a metabolite-based plant defense network (Thankappan et al., 2022). In rice, volatile profiling of rhizosphere microbiota remains an underexplored but promising avenue, particularly given the inhibitory properties of volatiles reported against Rhizoctonia solani in model systems.

5.3 Metagenomics-guided discovery of rare bioprotective taxa in stress-prone ecosystems

High-throughput metagenomic sequencing has revolutionized understanding of disease-suppressive communities by enabling unbiased detection of low-abundance taxa and biosynthetic gene clusters associated with pathogen suppression (Roy et al., 2025). In rice, metagenomic surveys under pathogen stress reveal that shifts in plant metabolome triggered by viral or fungal challenge can recruit beneficial microbes such as methanotrophs, nitrifiers, and other functional guilds, while selectively excluding destabilizing taxa, consistent with a sophisticated hitchhiking microbiome response (“cry for help”) (SRBSDV study, 2025) (Li et al., 2025; Guo et al., 2026). These stress-induced shifts illustrate the dynamic interplay between host exudate changes and microbiome assembly.

Beyond rice, functional metagenomics of suppressive soils in other crops has identified biosynthetic gene clusters, particularly no ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS) and siderophore pathways, as consistently enriched features associated with disease suppression (Tracanna et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2024). Applying similar approaches to rice soils can uncover novel bioactive metabolites, such as antimicrobial peptides and enzymes, that confer disease suppressiveness even when originating from rare taxa that would be overlooked by traditional culture-dependent studies. More recent developments in multi-omics methods have helped greatly to gain insight into the interactions of plants and microbiomes at a more mechanistic level. Indicatively, integrated metagenomic and metabolomic studies have shown that microbial consortia are capable of regulating host metabolic responses such as the shikimate and the phenylpropanoid pathways that are associated with stress tolerance as well as host defense. Transcriptomic analyses have also shown up-regulation of gene families that encode important nutrient transporters, e.g. OsPht1 family, in response to microbial-derived metabolites, e.g. organic acids. The results demonstrate the value of multi-omics data integration to reveal functional connections among microbial activity and plant performance.

Integrating metagenomics with metabolomics facilitates identification of both taxonomic contributors and specific molecular features (e.g., polyketide synthases) underpinning suppressive phenotypes. For instance, recent metagenomic-guided work showed that application of Bacillus biofertilizer stimulated populations of predatory protist taxa and elevated polyketide synthase (PKS) gene abundance, which correlated with suppression of Ralstonia solanacearum in soil (Pei et al., 2026). Such combined taxonomic and functional insight provides mechanistic targets for next-generation rhizosphere redesign.

6 Industrial-scale production and formulation strategies for translational deployment

6.1 Cutting-edge bioprocessing techniques for stable, high-viability consortia production

Scaling the production of beneficial microbial consortia from laboratory to industrial volumes remains a key bottleneck in translating rhizosphere engineering breakthroughs into commercial agricultural products (Dos Reis et al., 2024). In microbial biomass fermentation on an industrial scale, a controlled fermentation platform, which is often optimized in the form of a stir-tank bioreactor with optimum impellers, sparge, and baffles, is commonly used to maintain high cell concentrations >1 × 10⁸ cells mL^-1, typically to maintain consistent yield volumes to meet commercial requirements. These systems allow precise control of pH, dissolved oxygen, nutrient feed, and temperature, which can be controlled, thus optimizing specific growth rates of consortium members and ensuring stable coexistence of multiple strains, which is paramount to the stability of synbiotic communities.

Real-time tracking and control built into emerging bioprocess design stabilize community composition by countering the dominance of faster-growth strains or the removal of substrates. Machine learning and model-based control architecture have been discovered to regulate microbial densities in multi-organism bioreactors, even at varying conditions (Brancato et al., 2025). The resulting advanced control systems have the benefit of dynamically controlling feed rates and environmental parameters to achieve target composition and have potential in the production of complex consortia by industry that surpasses the performance of single-strain inoculants.

However, bioprocessing remains a complex challenge where scale-up and downstream processing (e.g., concentration, formulation) can be made viable without genetic modification (e.g., Gram-negative bacteria) (Dos Reis et al., 2024). Further important considerations in production, as far as commercial biofertilizers are concerned, involve scheduling production runs in order to prevent cross-contamination and also in order to guarantee reproducibility between the batches.

6.2 Formulation innovations: encapsulation, carrier optimization, and shelf-life extension

The strategy of formulation used to protect living cells and preserve their viability over storage and delivery of functional elements to soil/rhizosphere niches is critical to the efficacy and commercial viability of microbial agricultural products (Khan et al., 2023; Fadiji et al., 2024). Conventional carrier-based products can be characterized by short shelf life (usually 6–12 months under ideal conditions) and inactivation of viable cells below efficacy levels (e.g., <1 ×10⁸ CFU g^-1) (Zayed, 2016; Cassán et al., 2026). The solutions can be found in innovative technologies of encapsulation, which incorporate microbes in protective matrices that alleviate the effects of desiccation, temperature, and salt toxicity of nutrients (Hu et al., 2023).

Encapsulation based on polysaccharides, such as the use of alginate, chitosan, cellulose, with composite hydrogels, has shown better survival and controlled release of useful microorganisms. As an illustration, Pseudomonas fluorescens encapsulated with 3 per cent of chitosan had a shelf life of about ten months, compared to conventional encasements, such as sodium alginate (Isabel et al., 2024). Likewise, trehalose-doped core-shell hydrogels also extended the shelf life of Trichoderma harzianum with viability between log 5.72 CFU/g to log 7.30 CFU/g at 180 days of compound fertilizers with 15 percent NPK (Hu et al., 2023). Such formulations can not only contain a physical barrier, but also an array of osmotic protectants and humectants that can further increase survival in the conditions of environmental stress in storage and after application.

Highly developed hydrogel and microcapsule matrices have demonstrated that composition on formulation is highly affected by storage factors, including temperature and time, with some interactions yielding over six months of microbial activity at room temperature and over a year of preservation at refrigerated conditions (Dolatabad, 2026). Biochar, trehalose, and glycerol are some of the formulation carriers that are capable of stabilizing Gram-positive and Gram-negative microorganisms across various storage conditions as a result of synergy, which highlights the significance of the personalized formulation design to specific microorganisms. High formulation techniques ensure the survival of microbial consortia against environmental stresses during storage and use, and lead to long-term survival and controlled release in the rhizosphere. Encapsulations of matrices and carrier mediums maintain community integrity, increase shelf life, and functional efficacy, thus promoting predictable translation in vivo application of engineered microbiomes in rice manufacturing (Table 3).

Table 3 highlights that advanced encapsulation technologies using alginate, chitosan, and osmoprotectants can significantly extend shelf-life and viability of microbial consortia under stressful storage conditions.

Alternatives to dry powders or encapsulated products with shorter stability have also been proven to preserve viability of both bacterial and fungal strains up to 12 months at ambient temperatures using novel liquid formulation strategies, including long-lasting double emulsions, which are useful in rice production areas with hot and humid climates (Ferrari et al., 2024).

6.3 Regulatory and scalability challenges: bridging lab discoveries to commercial agro-products

Using microbial consortia has regulatory complexity and scalability challenges, despite its technological advances in production and formulation. In countries like India, Brazil, Canada, Australia, and Uruguay (among others), regulatory authorities have quality assurance standards, such as minimum viable counts (which are generally 10⁸ CFU mL^-1 or more to consider the product a formulation), the absence of contaminants, and stability throughout the shelf life (Dos Reis et al., 2024). Regulatory hurdles vary significantly by region; for example, the EU’s Fertilizing Products Regulation (2019/1009) maintains strict ‘positive lists’ for microbial species, often excluding novel SynCom members, whereas Brazilian and Indian frameworks allow for faster registration of multi-strain products provided they meet minimum viability standards of 10⁸ CFU/g. These rules not only control efficacy, but also safety, which requires detailed identification of the microbial strains, purity checks, and specified conditions of use before registration of the products.

In addition, the initial issues with standardization and the use of comparable terminology (i.e., biofertilizer or (i.e. bio stimulant) in different jurisdictions make market entry and labeling challenging (Mannino, 2025; Santos et al., 2024). The live microorganisms can also react irregularly to local soil and climatic conditions, unlike the chemical input, and therefore, regulators may request increased amounts of data on field efficacy before approval.

Scalability also overlaps with economic issues; to preserve the viability during storage and transportation, cold chains, or even special packaging (e.g., UV-protective, moisture-controlled) is required, which adds to the costs and restricts operation in remote locations (Narayana et al., 2025). Moreover, the infrastructure and training of the farmers on the right usage are still inadequate in most of the regions, which is a non-technical scalability barrier. Beyond efficacy, the introduction of engineered consortia poses ecological risks, including ‘biological pollution.’ High-titer inoculants may outcompete rare native taxa, leading to a temporary loss of local microbial diversity. Long-term studies are required to ensure that SynCom-mediated yield gains do not come at the cost of native soil ecosystem resilience.

These issues will need a multidisciplinary approach with scientists, manufacturers, regulators, and extension services to develop harmonized standards, scalable bioprocessing processes, and effective distribution mechanisms to deliver constant and high-performing microbial products to farmers in every part of the world. In addition to regulatory and scalability challenges, ecological risks associated with microbial interventions must be considered. Introduced microbial consortia may struggle to establish stable populations due to competition with native microbiota, leading to inconsistent performance. Moreover, large-scale application of high-density inoculants may disrupt indigenous microbial communities, potentially reduce native biodiversity or alter ecosystem functions. There is also a risk of unintended ecological consequences, such as the spread of opportunistic traits or imbalance in nutrient cycling processes. Therefore, long-term ecological monitoring and risk assessment frameworks are essential to ensure that microbiome engineering strategies remain sustainable and environmentally safe.

7 Translational potential and future directions in climate-vulnerable rice agroecosystems

7.1 Field-evidenced yield stability gains under abiotic stresses (drought, salinity, flooding)

Climate change agents such as drought, salinity, and unpredictable rain patterns are progressively endangering rice (Oryza sativa L.), which interferes with the water balance, nutrient supply, and the yield stability of plants (Sharma and Joshi, 2025). When the drought occurs, the yield of rice may decrease drastically because of the decrease in biomass accumulation level and poor root development. As an example, 24 days of controlled drought treatments had significant negative effects on root length and dry weight of shoots when compared to well-watered controls, which means that yield penalties would occur in most cases in the context of water deficit (Lei et al., 2023). Nevertheless, the rhizosheath-associated microbial communities strengthened by intermediate drought comprised taxa that are also known to produce indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and siderophores, in this case, suggesting that they could be useful in the field should these be converted into consortia products.

Salinity stress is a widespread issue in coastal and dryland rice systems, which interferes with ionic and osmotic balance, leading to oxidative stress, nutrient imbalances, and reduced rice productivity (Gupta et al., 2023). Recent isolates of rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria, including Bacillus haynesii and Pseudomonas fluorescens, by far enhanced salinity tolerance of rice cultivars in conditions of 200 mM NaCl by increasing the activity of antioxidant enzymes (CAT, SOD, PPO) and surrounding expression of stress-responsive genes like OsPIP1 and MnSOD1, eventually supporting better photosynthetic performance and stress mitigation pathways associated with yield stability in salty environments (Gupta et al., 2023).

The effect of salinity upon relevant fields also highlights that salinity tolerance is a multifaceted microbiome structuring: metagenomic surveys of rice rhizospheres under high salinity and alkalinity demonstrated unique microbial community assemblages between different varieties, with tolerant plants showing more microbial taxa associated with nutrient cycling and stress adaptation. These compositional variations were linked to variations in panicle number and grain per panicle in saline soil, which indicated that changes in rhizosphere microbiome might be the basis of real yield resilience in saline fields (Zhong et al., 2025).

Though the use of classical breeding of SUB1A-carrying rice varieties has long been used to enhance flood tolerance, microbial interventions can also enhance yield in intermittently waterlogged environments by facilitating redox cycling and nutrient accretion under low-oxygen conditions, though direct field studies of the association between microbial inoculants and flood tolerance are still scarce and form a major area of investigation.

All of these field and pot studies point to the fact that microbial associates may enhance physiological resistance to abiotic stressors associated with climate variability. The mechanistic comprehension still remains to be elaborated, but the conversion of the yield advantage on a field scale demand a solid examination of the climatic gradients and the types of soils. Notably, some studies report limited or no significant yield improvements following microbial inoculation, particularly under nutrient-rich or highly competitive soil environments, highlighting the importance of considering negative or neutral outcomes in evaluating microbial interventions.

However, reported improvements in stress tolerance are not always consistent across studies. While some experiments demonstrate significant gains in biomass and yield under stress conditions, others report minimal or variable responses depending on soil composition, microbial persistence, and plant genotype. These inconsistencies highlight reproducibility challenges and suggest that microbial performance is highly context-dependent rather than universally transferable across agroecosystems.

7.2 Synergistic integration with rice breeding and precision farming for resilient systems

The accomplishment of climate-resilient rice systems should be based on the combination of microbiome-based approaches with genetic improvement and precision agronomy. Recent reviews emphasize that plant breeding is capable of influencing the rhizosphere microbiome community, where host genotype has stronger effects on microbial community formation than soil in certain instances (Zhong et al., 2025). This host-driven microbiome selection offers opportunities to breed rice varieties that preferentially recruit growth-promoting and stress-adaptive microbes, thereby embedding resilience as a heritable trait (González-Estrada et al., 2026; Ben-Laouane et al., 2026). For example, rice cultivars cultivated in soils with high salinity demonstrated genotype-specific differences in rhizosphere community structure and associated yield traits, which suggests that breeding efforts that consider microbiome recruitment traits could yield varieties better equipped to maintain productivity under stress (Misu et al., 2025; Dakshayini et al., 2025).

Precision farming technologies, including site-specific soil moisture and salinity sensors, variable rate irrigation, and real-time crop monitoring, can enhance the delivery of microbial products and synchronize them with plant phenology and stress events. Integrating microbiome interventions into precision platforms may allow adaptive management that optimizes plant–microbe interactions under dynamic environmental conditions. Indeed, some models propose the use of algorithm-driven scheduling of microbial inoculants to coincide with the onset of drought or salinity events to maximize their efficacy in supporting root growth and stress response pathways (Sharma and Joshi, 2025).

The integration of microbial selection with traditional breeding programs also raises the potential to select for microbiome-shaping root exudate profiles that favor beneficial taxa under stress. Such an approach acknowledges that the plant’s genetic makeup and its secretome both influence microbiome assembly and functionality, enabling synergistic selection of plant–microbe partnerships that sustain yield stability under climate threats.

7.3 Horizon innovations: synthetic biology, iterative microbiome selection, and long-term ecosystem engineering

Looking forward, synthetic biology and iterative microbiome selection stand out as promising innovation frontiers for rice agroecosystems. Synthetic biology has the potential to provide tools for designing microbial strains with enhanced functional traits; however, its application in rice systems is still largely experimental and requires further validation under field conditions. The so-called programmable holobiont, which is an adaptable and engineered system of plants and microbes that can respond to stress gradients, is becoming a blueprint for future resilient crop systems (Portal-Gonzalez et al., 2025).

Synthetic biology could be supplemented by iterative microbiome selection, a community evolution method that has been shown to enrich with advantageous functional characteristics and stress resilience by selecting under regulated stress imposition. These methods utilize the principles of ecology to stabilize useful assemblies that remain functional despite environmental changes and stabilize beneficial output of functional services like nutrient provisioning and stress signaling.

The other approach of long-term ecosystem engineering is the development of cropping systems where a favorable assembly of microbiomes can be achieved, such as crop rotations, soil amendments, and conservation tillage, which affect soil organic matter and the stability of microbial habitats. When used together with microbial inoculants and host genetics, these practices promote ecosystem-scale resilience signals along with trait-specific improvements. Stress-based iterative microbiome selection combined with synthetic biology designs climate-adaptive field functioning resilient rice holobionts (Figure 3).

Figure 3

Overall, the development of translational approaches to climate-prone rice systems should combine the experiences of microbiome studies, plant genomics, and precision agronomy to develop resilient and adaptive crop production systems. This will need long-term interdisciplinary cooperation and field-scale validation in different agroecosystems of rice.

7.4 Field-level validation and scalability constraints

There is a wide gap between the controlled pot experiments and applications of pot at the field scale. The colonization efficiency of SynComs has been in most cases lowered by environmental buffering and competition with native microbes to less than 10% of their greenhouse performance in the field. As an example, although the P-solubilization genes are likely to be up-regulated in sterilized peat, they are highly suppressed in mineral-containing, unsterilized tropical paddy soils by local pH variations and native antagonistic microbes. Although controlled environment studies are of great importance in understanding the mechanisms, the issue of scaling microbial interventions to the field has posed a significant challenge. Field environments add spatial and temporal heterogeneity to soil properties, climate, and native microbial communities, which may have profound impacts on the formation and functioning of introduced consortia. SynCom colonization efficiency in most instances reduces drastically in non-sterile soils because of the competition with the native microbiota. Moreover, there is the possibility of environmental variation due to temperature, moisture, and heterogeneity of nutrients which will result in unreliable location-season comparisons. These are some of the factors that result in variability in yield responses and the reproducibility of results in the greenhouse condition is limited. Logistical issues such as stability of the formulation, storage and delivery methods also limit scalability. To overcome these constraints, long-term, multi-location field trials and the creation of adaptive, place-specific microbial formulations, capable of operating effectively across a variety of agroecological situations are necessary.

8 Conclusion

Biological engineering of rice rhizosphere can be an effective solution to greater nutrient use, ability to withstand stress, and crop sustainability. This move toward single strain inoculants and synthetic microbial consortia (SynComs) is an indication of the possibility of functional integrated microbial communities to improve plant performance by coordinated interactions. The majority of reported benefits are however obtained under controlled conditions and the ability to repeat them under field conditions is not constant because of the heterogeneity of the environment, plant genotype and competition with native microbiota. The trade-offs also arise in increasing consortia complexity as it constrains consistent performance at scale between functional diversity and ecological stability. Other developing fields like methane reduction, microbiome-shaping genes and synthetic biology are still potential but need more solid empirical support in rice systems. Equally, the difficulties with formulation, administration, and regulatory acceptance still limit the big-scale use. The development of microbial design coupled with plant genetics, multi-omics tools, and precision agriculture combined with stringent multi-location field validation will be the key to future development. An innovative and eco-friendly mindset will be necessary to turn the engineering of microbiomes into a trustworthy and climate-adaptive solution to agriculture.

References

• 1

  AksarahA.BangkeleL. I. (2024). Effect of microbial consortium application on growth and yield of Oryza sativa L. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Ipa10, 3569–3577. doi:10.29303/jppipa.v10i7.7272

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 2

  AloriE. T.DareM. O.BabalolaO. O. (2017). “ Microbial inoculants for soil quality and plant health,” in Sustainable agriculture reviews (Cham, Switzerland: Springer).

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 3

  AminurrasyidA. H. B.Mohd IkmalA.NadarajahK. K. (2025). The rice-microbe nexus: unlocking productivity through soil science. Rice18, 56. doi:10.1186/s12284-025-00809-0. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 4

  ArbaughB. M.RezaeiF.Mohiti-AsliM.PenaS.ScherH. B.JeohT. (2022). A strategy for stable, on-seed application of a nitrogen-fixing microbial inoculant by microencapsulation in spray-dried cross-linked alginates. ACS Agric. Sci. Technol.2, 950–959. doi:10.1021/acsagscitech.2c00107

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 5

  BallaA.SiliniA.Cherif-SiliniH.Chenari BouketA.AleneziF. N.BelbahriL. (2022). Recent advances in encapsulation techniques of plant growth-promoting microorganisms and their prospects in the sustainable agriculture. Appl. Sci.12, 9020. doi:10.3390/app12189020. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 6

  Ben-LaouaneR.Ait-El-MokhtarM.MeddichA.BaslamM. (2026). Nodule–microbiome dynamics: Deciphering the complexities of nodule symbiosis and the root microbiome. Int. J. Mol. Sci.27, 1487. doi:10.3390/ijms27031487. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 7

  BrancatoS. M.SalzanoD.FioreD.De LellisF.RussoG.Di BernardoM. (2025). “ A bioreactor-based architecture for in vivo model-based and sim-to-real learning control of microbial consortium composition,” in arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.08554. (Ithaca, NY, USA: arXiv) arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.08554.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 8

  CassánF. D.SchoebitzM.Moreno-CidJ. A.GiroldoA. F.ScarabelD.PuenteM.et al. (2026). “ Inoculant preparation and formulations for Azospirillum spp,” in The definitive handbook of azospirillum: 100 years of research and application around the world (Cham, Switzerland: Springer).

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 9

  CernavaT. (2024). Coming of age for microbiome gene breeding in plants. Nat. Commun.15, 6623. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50700-7. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  ChangJ.CostaO. Y.SunY.WangJ.TianL.ShiS.et al. (2025). Domesticated rice alters the rhizosphere microbiome, reducing nitrogen fixation and increasing nitrous oxide emissions. Nat. Commun.16, 2038. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-57213-x. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 11

  Chaparro-RodríguezM.Estrada-BonillaG.Rosas-PérezJ.Gómez-ÁlvarezM.Cruz-BarreraM. (2023). Hydrogel capsules as new approach for increasing drying survival of plant biostimulant gram-negative consortium. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.107, 6671–6682. doi:10.1007/s00253-023-12699-7. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 12

  DakshayiniE.MuthuramuS.MaragathamS.AnandhamR.BalachandarD. (2025). Rhizosphere microbiome and functioning in alternative rice cropping methods: A critical review for rice sustainability. Front. Bioscience-Elite17, 25926. doi:10.31083/fbe25926. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 13

  DeoR.LakraU.OjhaM.NigamV. K.SharmaS. R. (2025). Exopolysaccharides in microbial interactions: signalling, quorum sensing, and community dynamics. Nat. Prod. Res.39, 3224–3239. doi:10.1080/14786419.2024.2405867. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 14

  DhondgeH. V.PableA. A.BarvkarV. T.DastagerS. G.NadafA. B. (2021). Rhizobacterial consortium mediated aroma and yield enhancement in basmati and non-basmati rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Biotechnol.328, 47–58. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2021.01.012. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 15

  DolatabadH. K. (2026). Multifactorial formulation for stable encapsulated plant growth promoting microorganisms. Sci. Rep. 16, 1245. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-35331-w. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 16

  Dos ReisG. A.Martínez-BurgosW. J.PozzanR.Pastrana PucheY.Ocán-TorresD.De Queiroz Fonseca MotaP.et al. (2024). Comprehensive review of microbial inoculants: agricultural applications, technology trends in patents, and regulatory frameworks. Sustainability16, 8720. doi:10.3390/su16198720. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 17

  FadijiA. E.XiongC.EgidiE.SinghB. K. (2024). Formulation challenges associated with microbial biofertilizers in sustainable agriculture and paths forward. J. Sustain. Agric. Environ.3, e70006. doi:10.1002/sae2.70006. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 18

  FerrariP. F.BufaliniC.CampardelliR.BrondoloA.ErcoleE.PalomboD.et al. (2024). Stabilization of microbial strains in long-lasting double emulsions as a new strategy for liquid biofertilizer formulation. Food Bioprod. Process.148, 611–618. doi:10.1016/j.fbp.2024.10.020. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 19

  González-EstradaR. R.KumarA.TomarA.ParmarK. (2026). Microbial synergies: advanced strategies for plant stress alleviation (Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press).

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 20

  GuoJ.-W.YangH.WangX. (2026). “ Plant functional traits or microbiomes associated with diseases, pests, human activities and climate change,” (Basel, Switzerland: MDPI).

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 21

  GuptaA.SinghA. N.TiwariR. K.SahuP. K.YadavJ.SrivastavaA. K.et al. (2023). Salinity alleviation and reduction in oxidative stress by endophytic and rhizospheric microbes in two rice cultivars. Plants12, 976. doi:10.3390/plants12050976. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 22

  HabibiS.YokoyamaT.HaidariM. D.ToriiA.YasudaM.Ohkama-OhtsuN. (2023). Analyzing single and combined cultures of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria isolates from Afghanistan as a potential biofertilizer for rice growth and development. Agriculture13, 2252. doi:10.3390/agriculture13122252. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 23

  HalshoyH. S.BraimS. A.HamaJ. R. (2025). Phytohormonal regulation of root exudation: mechanisms and rhizosphere function. Plant Signaling Behav.20, 2587486. doi:10.1080/15592324.2025.2587486. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 24

  HarahapR. T.AzizahI. R.HerdiyantoroD.SetiawatiM. R.SimarmataT. (2023). Shelf life of biofilm producing PGPR liquid inoculants in different enriched media composition. Agro Bali: Agric. J.6, 278–285. doi:10.37637/ab.v6i2.1285

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 25

  HeY.WuZ.TuL.HanY.ZhangG.LiC. (2015). Encapsulation and characterization of slow-release microbial fertilizer from the composites of bentonite and alginate. Appl. Clay Sci.109, 68–75. doi:10.1016/j.clay.2015.02.001. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 26

  HossainM. D.RionM. S. I.DasP.RahmanA.QuadirQ. F. (2023). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) increases yield and mineral contents of rice by mobilizing nutrients in the rhizosphere. Res. Agric. Livestock Fisheries10, 73–81. doi:10.3329/ralf.v10i1.66223. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 27

  HuM.HeiR.-N.GuoD.-J.LuoJ.LuC.XuW.-L.et al. (2023). Shelf-life enhancement of bio-inoculants through synergistic effects of encapsulation technology and osmotic protectants. J. Environ. Chem. Eng.11, 110996. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2023.110996. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 28

  IftikharA.AijazN.FarooqR.AslamS.ZeeshanA.MunirM.et al. (2023). Beneficial role of phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) in enhancing soil fertility through a variety of actions on plants growth and ecological perspective: An updated review. J. Xi’an Shiyou University Natural Sci. Edition19, 520–547.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 29

  IsabelJ. B.BalamuruganA.DeviP. R.PeriyasamyS. (2024). Chitosan-encapsulated microbial biofertilizer: a breakthrough for enhanced tomato crop productivity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.260, 129462. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129462. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 30

  IslamM. M.JanaS. K.SenguptaS.MandalS. (2024). Impact of rhizospheric microbiome on rice cultivation. Curr. Microbiol.81, 188. doi:10.1007/s00284-024-03703-y. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 31

  JoshiD.KaushikA.KumarR.AryaA.SantoyoG.SinghV. K.et al. (2025). Improving plant performance through microbiome manipulation: the potential role of current bioengineering approaches. Bacteria4, 12. doi:10.3390/bacteria4010012. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 32

  KhanA.SinghA. V.GautamS. S.AgarwalA.PunethaA.UpadhayayV. K.et al. (2023). Microbial bioformulation: a microbial assisted biostimulating fertilization technique for sustainable agriculture. Front. Plant Sci.14, 1270039. doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1270039. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 33

  KwonY.JinY.LeeJ.-H.SunC.RyuC.-M. (2024). Rice rhizobiome engineering for climate change mitigation. Trends Plant Sci.29, 1299–1309. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2024.06.006. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  LeiZ.DingY.XuW.ZhangY. (2023). Microbial community structure in rice rhizosheaths under drought stress. J. Plant Ecol.16, rtad012. doi:10.1093/jpe/rtad012

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  LiP.TianY.YangK.TianM.ZhuY.ChenX.et al. (2024). Mechanism of microbial action of the inoculated nitrogen-fixing bacterium for growth promotion and yield enhancement in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Advanced Biotechnol.2, 32. doi:10.1007/s44307-024-00038-4. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  LiZ.LuoW.XieH.MoC.QinB.ZhaoY.et al. (2025). Reovirus infection results in rice rhizosphere microbial community reassembly through metabolite-mediated recruitment and exclusion. Microbiome13, 1–19. doi:10.1186/s40168-025-02188-6. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  MaH.ZhangH.ZhengC.LiuZ.WangJ.TianP.et al. (2024). Synthetic microbial community isolated from intercropping system enhances P uptake in rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci.25, 12819. doi:10.3390/ijms252312819. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  MaithaniD.SinghH.SharmaA. (2020). “ Stress alleviation in plants using SAR and ISR: Current views on stress signaling network,” in Microbes and signaling biomolecules against plant stress: strategies of plant-microbe relationships for better survival (Cham, Switzerland: Springer).

  • Google Scholar

• 39

  ManninoG. (2025). Plant-biostimulants interaction: scientific trends, markets dynamics, and real-world implication. J. Plant Interact.20, 2572668. doi:10.1080/17429145.2025.2572668. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  MeenaR. K.Influence of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria inoculation on physiological and agronomic traits in Basmati rice (Oryza sativa L.). MEENA, R. K. Influence of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria inoculation on physiological and agronomic traits in Basmati rice (Oryza sativa L.).

  • Google Scholar

• 41

  MisuI. J.KayessM. O.SiddiquiM. N.GuptaD. R.IslamM. N.IslamT. (2025). Microbiome engineering for sustainable rice production: strategies for biofertilization, stress tolerance, and climate resilience. Microorganisms13, 233. doi:10.3390/microorganisms13020233. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  MonicaS.PanneerselvamS.RajasekaranR.NalliappanS.KailappanA.RangasamyA. (2025). Recent advances in bioinoculant formulations and their shelf-life: a review. Curr. Microbiol.82, 506. doi:10.1007/s00284-025-04497-3. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  MwaijitaM. R. (2017). Isolation and rice plants response to bio-fertilizing and bio-enhancing isolates from Kenyan coastal, central and Western regions (Juja, Kenya: Faculty of Agriculture, JKUAT).

  • Google Scholar

• 44

  NarayanaS.JagetiyaP.MathurR.MishraR.ChauhanS. (2025). Biofertilizer commercialization: Future prospects and challenges. Agric. Res. J.62, 1–15. doi:10.5958/2395-146x.2025.00001.8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  PalkinaK. A.ChoobV. V.YampolskyI. V.MishinA. S.BalakirevaA. V. (2025). Pros and cons of interactions between crops and beneficial microbes. Agriculture15, 2526. doi:10.3390/agriculture15242526. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  PanJ.-Y.WangC.-B.NongJ.-L.XieQ.-L.ShenT.-M. (2023). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria are important contributors to rice yield in karst soils. 3 Biotech.13, 158. doi:10.1007/s13205-023-03593-0. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  PeiX.ZhangN.DengX.LiR.WangY.WangY.et al. (2026). Biofertilizer induces soil disease suppression by activating pathogen suppressive protist taxa. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 12, 42. doi:10.1038/s41522-025-00897-2. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  Pérez-MontañoF.AparicioN.ArenasF.ArjonaJ. M.CamachoM.Fernández-GarcíaN.et al. (2025). Emerging crops and plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB): a synergistic approach to climate-resilient agriculture. Microbiome13, 228. doi:10.1093/9780198948964.003.0013. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  PhringpaenW.AiedhetW.ThitithanakulS.KanjanasopaD. (2023). Ability of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria to enhance the growth of rice in phosphorus-deficient soils. Trends Sci.20, 7032–7032. doi:10.48048/tis.2023.7032

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  Portal-GonzalezN.WangW.HeW.Santos-BermudezR. (2025). Engineering plant holobionts for climate-resilient agriculture. ISME J.19, wraf158. doi:10.1093/ismejo/wraf158. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  PradhanS.MitraN.SahuR. (2025). Microbial consortia enhance wheat productivity, plant nutrition and soil fertility in Vertisols of Central India. Front. Sustain. Food Syst.9, 1699269. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2025.1699269

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  Ríos-RuizW. F.Torres-ChávezE. E.Torres-DelgadoJ.Rojas-GarcíaJ. C.BedmarE. J.Valdez-NuñezR. A. (2020). Inoculation of bacterial consortium increases rice yield (Oryza sativa L.) reducing applications of nitrogen fertilizer in San Martin region, Peru. Rhizosphere14, 100200. doi:10.1016/j.rhisph.2020.100200. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  Rios-RuizW. F.Tuanama-ReáteguiC.Huamán-CórdovaG.Valdez-NuñezR. A. (2023). Co-inoculation of endophytes Bacillus siamensis TUR07-02b and Priestia megaterium SMBH14–02 promotes growth in rice with low doses of nitrogen fertilizer. Plants12, 524. doi:10.3390/plants12030524. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  RoyS.MurmuM.ChatterjeeS.BarmanM.DasA.KumarS.et al. (2025). “ Exploring plant disease ecology through meta-omics: Current insights and future perspectives,” in Meta-omics in crop improvement: volume I: methods and approaches (Cham, Switzerland: Springer).

  • Google Scholar

• 55

  SantiagoM. I.FranceschiniM. H.Del PonteE. M.Do AmaralC. H.AlfenasR. F. (2025). Leaf diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for early detection of Ceratocystis wilt in Eucalyptus cuttings. For. Pathol.55, e70052. doi:10.31219/osf.io/2vn9m_v2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  SantosF.MelkaniS.Oliveira-PaivaC.BiniD.PavuluriK.GatiboniL.et al. (2024). Biofertilizer use in the United States: definition, regulation, and prospects. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.108, 511. doi:10.1007/s00253-024-13347-4. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  SantosM. S.NogueiraM. A.HungriaM. (2019). Microbial inoculants: reviewing the past, discussing the present and previewing an outstanding future for the use of beneficial bacteria in agriculture. Amb Express9, 205. doi:10.1186/s13568-019-0932-0. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  SharmaS.JoshiM. (2025). Microbial strategies for enhancing wheat and rice resilience to drought, salinity, and heat stress. Rhizosphere34, 101108. doi:10.1016/j.rhisph.2025.101108. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  SherpaM. T.SharmaL.BagN.DasS. (2021). Isolation, characterization, and evaluation of native rhizobacterial consortia developed from the rhizosphere of rice grown in organic state Sikkim, India, and their effect on plant growth. Front. Microbiol.12, 713660. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.713660. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  SinghM.JhaS.PathakD.MaisnamG. (2025). Advancing biofertilizers: the evolution from single-strain formulations to synthetic microbial communities (SynCom) for sustainable agriculture. Discover Plants2, 226. doi:10.1007/s44372-025-00318-w. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  SultanaR.JashimA. I. I.IslamS. M. N.RahmanM. H.HaqueM. M. (2024). Bacterial endophyte Pseudomonas mosselii PR5 improves growth, nutrient accumulation, and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) through various application methods. BMC Plant Biol.24, 1030. doi:10.1186/s12870-024-05649-6. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62

  SunW.LiuQ.ChenH.XieX.ZhangZ.ZengY.et al. (2025). Rice phyllospheric Pantoea spp. suppress blast and bacterial blight diseases. Environ. Microbiome20, 137. doi:10.1186/s40793-025-00799-y. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63

  ThakurN.NigamM.MannN. A.GuptaS.HussainC. M.ShuklaS. K.et al. (2023). Host-mediated gene engineering and microbiome-based technology optimization for sustainable agriculture and environment. Funct. Integr. Genomics23, 57. doi:10.1007/s10142-023-00982-9. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 64

  ThamizharasanV.RaghuR.DjanaguiramanM.ParanidharanV.BalachandarD. (2025). Rice root exudate modulates functional traits of plant‐growth‐promoting bacteria: A step towards rhizosphere engineering. J. Basic Microbiol.65, e70098. doi:10.1002/jobm.70098. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65

  ThankappanS.NarayanasamyS.SridharanA.BinodhA.KumariA. N.ParasuramanP.et al. (2022). Rhizospheric volatilome in modulating induced systemic resistance against biotic stress: A new paradigm for future food security. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol.120, 101852. doi:10.1016/j.pmpp.2022.101852. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66

  TracannaV.OssowickiA.PetrusM. L.OverduinS.TerlouwB. R.LundG.et al. (2021). Dissecting disease-suppressive rhizosphere microbiomes by functional amplicon sequencing and 10× metagenomics. MSystems6 (3), e01116–20. doi:10.1128/msystems.01116-20. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 67

  Turino MattosM. L.ValgasR. A.MartinsJ. F. D. S. (2023). Coinoculation with growth-promoting bacteria increases the efficiency of nitrogen use by irrigated rice. ACS Omega8, 48719–48727. doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c05339. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68

  WangY.Dall'AgnolR. F.BertaniI.BezC.VenturiV. (2024). Identification of synthetic consortia from a set of plant‐beneficial bacteria. Microb. Biotechnol.17, e14330. doi:10.1111/1751-7915.14330. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 69

  WangY.DingD. (2024). Enhancing rice productivity with plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPM). Field Crop7 (2), 70–78.

  • Google Scholar

• 70

  WangJ.GaoX.YangM.ZhangY.ChenY. (2025). Alleviative effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on salt-stressed rice seedlings: mechanisms mediated by rhizosphere microbiota and root exudates. Front. Plant Sci.16, 1661074. doi:10.3389/fpls.2025.1661074. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 71

  WangC.KuzyakovY. (2024). Rhizosphere engineering for soil carbon sequestration. Trends Plant Sci.29, 447–468. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2023.09.015. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 72

  WankhadeA.WilkinsonE.BrittD. W.KaundalA. (2025). A review of plant–microbe interactions in the rhizosphere and the role of root exudates in microbiome engineering. Appl. Sci.15, 7127. doi:10.3390/app15137127. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 73

  WickramasingheW.GirijaD. (2023). Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria consortia for growth and yield improvement in rice. Trop. Agriculturist171 (1), 1–15. doi:10.4038/ta.v171i1.38

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 74

  YangS. (2024). The role of microbial community structure in rice rhizosphere over the growing season. Mol. Soil Biol.15 (5), 247–55. doi:10.5376/msb.2024.15.0025

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 75

  YangC.-X.ChenS.-J.HongX.-Y.WangL.-Z.WuH.-M.TangY.-Y.et al. (2025). Plant exudates-driven microbiome recruitment and assembly facilitates plant health management. FEMS Microbiol. Rev.49, fuaf008. doi:10.1093/femsre/fuaf008. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 76

  ZayedM. S. (2016). “ Advances in formulation development technologies,” in Microbial inoculants in sustainable agricultural productivity: vol. 2: functional applications (Cham, Switzerland: Springer).

  • Google Scholar

• 77

  ZhangZ.ZhangL.ZhangL.ChuH.ZhouJ.JuF. (2024). Diversity and distribution of biosynthetic gene clusters in agricultural soil microbiomes. MSystems9, e01263-23. doi:10.1128/msystems.01263-23. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 78

  ZhangW.ZhengL.LangD.ZhangX.MaX.LiX.et al. (2023). Eco-friendly bio-encapsulation from sodium alginate-trehalose-kaolin and its performance evaluation in improving plant growth under salt or/and drought conditions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.225, 123–134. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.12.009. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 79

  ZhongY.ChiH.WuT.FanW.SuH.LiR.et al. (2025). Diversity of rhizosphere microbial communities in different rice varieties and their diverse adaptive responses to saline and alkaline stress. Front. Microbiol.16, 1537846. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1537846. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 80

  ZhouQ.GaoX.WuQ.ZengW.CaoW.ZhouT.et al. (2026). Cross-kingdom synthetic microbiota suppresses wheat Fusarium crown rot by remodeling the rhizosphere microbiome and metabolome. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 74 (12), 4321–35. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.5c11786. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 81

  ZhuL.HuangJ.LuX.ZhouC. (2022). Development of plant systemic resistance by beneficial rhizobacteria: Recognition, initiation, elicitation and regulation. Front. Plant Sci.13, 952397. doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.952397. PMID:

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar