REVIEW article

Front. Insect Sci.

Sec. Pest Management

Semiochemical Inhibitors for Protecting Conifers from Bark Beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in the Western United States: Research, Development, and Application

  • 1. Research and Development, Forest Service (USDA), Washington, United States

  • 2. University of California Davis Department of Plant Sciences, Davis, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract

In the western U.S., the research, development and application (RD&A) of semiochemical inhibitors for protecting conifers from bark beetles has focused on antiaggregation pheromones and, to a lesser extent, nonhost volatiles. The sequence begins with identifying potential inhibitors by searching relevant literature; sampling the volatile profiles of bark beetle extracts, frass, infested host materials, hosts, nonhosts, and the forest environment; and/or conducting gas chromatographic-electroantennographic detection analyses of bark beetle antennae. Promising inhibitors are then evaluated for levels of inhibition in trapping and tree protection assays under field conditions. Additional assays are required to refine inhibitors and to inform the spacing and distribution of release devices. Factors affecting levels of tree protection include (a) the population density of the target bark beetle species, (b) forest structure and composition, (c) variability in bark beetle responses to inhibitors, (d) the stereochemistry and chemical stability of inhibitors in the forest environment, (e) release rates of inhibitors, (f) strength of inhibition, (g) zone of inhibition, and (h) the presence of other stressors and disturbances. Once an inhibitor has been successfully developed, there are substantial costs and data requirements associated with registration. The commercial availability of inhibitors for protecting conifers from bark beetles is limited but evidence suggests there are favorable benefit-to-cost returns to be realized with additional investments in RD&A. Opportunities include (a) developing new (or better) inhibitors, inhibitory blends, and formulations, (b) automating (e.g., via unmanned aerial vehicles) and optimizing applications of inhibitors in the field, (c) developing cheaper and more efficient means of synthesizing inhibitors, (d) streamlining regulatory processes and incentivizing RD&A to expedite the commercial availability of products, and (e) integrating inhibitors with other management tactics. We review recent advances in the use of inhibitors for western pine beetle, Dendroctonus brevicomis LeConte, southwestern pine beetle, D. barberi Hopkins, mountain pine beetle, D. ponderosae Hopkins, Douglas-fir beetle, D. pseudotsugae Hopkins, spruce beetle, D. rufipennis (Kirby), northern spruce engraver, Ips perturbatus (Eichhoff), and pine engraver, I. pini (Say). Research on these and other bark beetles has informed the RD&A of inhibitors for other forest and agricultural pests.

Summary

Keywords

Antiaggregation pheromones, Dendroctonus, IPS, Nonhost volatiles, tree protection

Received

15 July 2026

Accepted

10 August 2026

Copyright

© 2026 Fettig and Audley. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Christopher John Fettig

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Share article

Article metrics