<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "archivearticle.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Mar. Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Marine Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Mar. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-7745</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmars.2022.978654</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Marine Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Trends in the abundance of Celtic Sea demersal fish: Identifying the relative importance of fishing and environmental drivers</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Kempf</surname>
<given-names>Jed</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1880436"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Breen</surname>
<given-names>Patricia</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rogan</surname>
<given-names>Emer</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/828563"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Reid</surname>
<given-names>David G.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/851328"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>'School of Biological, Earth &amp; Environmental Sciences, University College Cork</institution>, <addr-line>Cork</addr-line>, <country>Ireland</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Marine Institute, Rinville, Oranmore Co.</institution>, <addr-line>Galway</addr-line>, <country>Ireland</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Marta Coll, Institute of Marine Sciences (CSIC), Spain</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Lohengrin Fernandes, Instituto de Estudos do Mar Almirante Paulo Moreira, Brazil; Fabio Fiorentino, Institute for Biological Resources and Marine Biotechnology (CNR), Italy</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Jed Kempf, <email xlink:href="mailto:jed.kempf@marine.ie">jed.kempf@marine.ie</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002">
<p>This article was submitted to Marine Conservation and Sustainability, a section of the journal Frontiers in Marine Science</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>13</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>9</volume>
<elocation-id>978654</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>26</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>22</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2022 Kempf, Breen, Rogan and Reid</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Kempf, Breen, Rogan and Reid</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>The Celtic Sea is a productive fishing ground, therefore identifying the relative importance of fishing and environmental factors on fish stock dynamics is crucial for developing our understanding of sustainable yields and to operationalize Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management (EBFM). We investigated the effect of environmental variables and fishing on the relative abundance inferred from catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE), of twelve demersal stocks (i.e., cod, haddock, whiting, anglerfish, hake, megrim, plaice, sole, lesser-spotted dogfish, spurdog, <italic>Trisopterus</italic> spp., skates and rays) in the Celtic Sea from 1997 to 2019 (23 years). Annualized time series (1997-2019) of net primary production, bottom temperature, copepod abundance (<italic>Calanus finmarchicus</italic> and <italic>Calanus helgolandicus</italic>) and North Atlantic Oscillation index were used to characterize key environmental variables. Fishing exploitation rates (F/F<sub>MSY</sub>) were used to represent fishing pressure and CPUE trends derived from an International Bottom Trawl Survey (IBTS) were used to infer abundance. We used redundancy analysis to identify key explanatory variables and then dynamic factor analysis to assess their relationships with the CPUE series and identify underlying patterns in the unexplained temporal variation. Our results show that for the majority of demersal fish species, the CPUE trends were strongly influenced by fishing exploitation rates. The gradual reduction in exploitation rates observed throughout the study period most likely led to the partial recovery of cod, spurdog, hake, megrim, plaice, whiting, <italic>Trisopterus</italic> spp., and the skates and rays. In addition, exploitation patterns on one stock influenced CPUE trends of other demersal stocks (e.g., hake, megrim, plaice, lesser-spotted dogfish, sole). We also observed that the CPUE of whiting, hake and plaice increased when <italic>C. finmarchicus</italic> were abundant in the plankton. We infer from our findings in the investigated time series that the recovery of cod, spurdog, hake, megrim, plaice, whiting, <italic>Trisopterus</italic> spp., and the skates and rays in the Celtic Sea remains dependent on controlling fishing mortality, and this would not, at least for now, be confounded by the environmental conditions.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>ecosystem assessment</kwd>
<kwd>ecosystem based fisheries management</kwd>
<kwd>
<italic>Calanus finmarchicus</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>dynamic factor analysis</kwd>
<kwd>International Bottom Trawl Survey</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">15/S/744</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Ireland<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100001584</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="7"/>
<table-count count="4"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="81"/>
<page-count count="15"/>
<word-count count="7942"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<title>1 Introduction</title>
<p>Food security, livelihoods and coastal economies dependent on marine capture fisheries are connected to the dynamics of the fish populations they exploit. Fish populations fluctuate when gains attributed to recruitment and growth, and losses caused by natural and fishing mortality are imbalanced (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Sissenwine, 1984</xref>). Fishing mortality (F) &#x2013; the proportion of stock removed by fishing - is the most influential demographic factor that fisheries managers have direct control over, yet there are several demersal stocks (e.g., Irish Sea cod, Baltic Sea cod and herring) that have failed to rebuild despite marked reductions in fishing mortality (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">M&#xf6;llmann et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bentley et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). It is likely that the environmental conditions play a role, particularly on recruitment success (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Szuwalski et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Zimmermann et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>), because species are constrained by multiple dimensions of their ecological niche (e.g., temperature, salinity, habitat, predator and prey abundance) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Hutchinson, 1957</xref>). Identifying the relative importance of fishing and environmental factors on commercial stock dynamics is essential for effective management (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bindoff et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Baudron et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>) and to operationalize Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management (EBFM) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Link et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>To identify the relative roles of fishing and environmental conditions, biotic and abiotic variables are combined into an ecological time series (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Erzini, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">M&#xf6;llmann et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">M&#xf6;llmann et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Eriksen et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). In ecosystems that have been extensively monitored (e.g., Irish Sea, North Sea, Baltic Sea and the Barents Sea) and where long ecological time series have been maintained, research has identified environmental drivers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Erzini, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Eriksen et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bentley et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>) and regime shifts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">M&#xf6;llmann et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">M&#xf6;llmann et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bentley et&#xa0;al. (2020)</xref>, for example, proposed that cod (<italic>Gadus morhua</italic>) and whiting (<italic>Merlangius merlangus</italic>) recruitment - an important parameter in stock dynamics - in the Irish Sea was impaired by unsustainable fishing pressure coupled with the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation transitioning from a negative to a positive phase. In addition, herring (<italic>Clupea harengus</italic>) recruitment was positively correlated with large zooplankton abundance. In the Baltic Sea, unsustainable fishing pressure followed by an abrupt period of low salinity, hypoxic conditions, high temperatures and increased nutrient concentration reorganized the biotic component from a cod (<italic>Gadus morhua</italic>) to sprat (<italic>Sprattus sprattus</italic>) dominated ecosystem (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">M&#xf6;llmann et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">M&#xf6;llmann et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). In the North Sea, flatfish recruitment was linked to salinity changes and gadoid recruitment changed with sea surface temperature and calanoid copepod composition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Beaugrand, 2004</xref>). In southern Portugal, the landings of sardine (<italic>Sardina pilchardus</italic>) and cuttlefish (<italic>Sepia officinalis</italic>) had a positive relationship with the discharge of the Guadiana river (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Erzini, 2005</xref>). Finally, the increase of recruitment of herring, blue whiting and cod in the Barents Sea was associated with the increased influx of warm Atlantic water transporting krill and 0-group fish into the ecosystem (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Eriksen et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). From these studies it is clear that environmental variability affects fish stock dynamics and this understanding is required to make EBFM operational.</p>
<p>However, identifying drivers of ecosystem change is challenging because marine ecosystems are complex and dynamic. Ideally, all ecosystem components should be integrated into an ecosystem assessment to capture the totality of the system but short ecological time series, and therefore small sample sizes, limits statistical robustness. Including numerous explanatory variables to identify drivers increases model complexity which may overfit models, identify spurious relationships and fail to replicate findings with additional observations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Babyak, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Heinze and Dunkler, 2017</xref>). Furthermore, time series often contain autocorrelated and non-stationary processes that can inflate correlation values and therefore temporal structures need be accounted for when applying numerical analyses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Vanhatalo and Kulahci, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Planque and Arneberg, 2018</xref>). Principal component analysis (PCA) is a common multivariate technique used to summarize the dynamics of marine ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">M&#xf6;llmann et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">M&#xf6;llmann et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Eriksen et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). However, temporal structures can severely impair the descriptive performance of PCA to the point that strong patterns and spurious correlations emerge from randomly-generated time series (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Planque and Arneberg, 2018</xref>). An evaluation of the descriptive performance of several multivariate techniques identified redundancy analysis (RDA) and dynamic factor analysis (DFA) as potentially useful tools for analyzing short time series that contain autocorrelated and stationary processes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">ICES, 2022a</xref>).</p>
<p>This study focuses on the Celtic Sea, a productive shelf sea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Moullec et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>) located south of Ireland, where there are substantial commercial stocks which are important both commercially and socially. Intensive fishing since World War II has led to a depleted ecosystem (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Gascuel et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Hernvann and Gascuel, 2020</xref>) where commercial fish exhibit truncated length distributions and impoverished age structures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Gu&#xe9;nette and Gascuel, 2012</xref>). A long fishing history may have selected the most resilient species and shaped adaptable communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Blanchard et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>). Fishing itself produces other pressures on the ecosystem (e.g., bycatch, abrasion, litter) and likely contravenes legislative requirements set out in various EU policies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Pedreschi et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Enforceable management measures introduced by successive reforms of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">European Commission, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">European Parliament and European Council, 2013</xref>) have gradually reduced fishing mortality and the biomass of some commercial Celtic Sea stocks appear to have gradually recovered (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Fernandes and Cook, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">ICES, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">ICES, 2021</xref>). Consequently, the latest Celtic Sea ecological model (i.e., Ecopath with Ecosim) identified fishing pressure as the primary driver of ecosystem change from 1985 to 2016 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Hernvann et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Although fishing pressure was found to be the dominant driver in the Celtic Sea the integration of environmental variables, particularly temperature and primary production, improved the fit of the ecological model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Hernvann et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Interestingly, other studies that focused on the Celtic Sea in a similar time frame found that the structure of demersal assemblages were driven by depth, chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> and bottom temperature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">M&#xe9;rillet et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>) and the abundance of demersal species was driven by the abundance of small pelagics (e.g., European anchovy) <italic>via</italic> a bentho-pelagic trophic link (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Eme et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Considering the different results of the reported studies the relative importance of fishing and the environment on the abundance of demersal populations in the Celtic Sea remains unclear. Additional time points and the application of multivariate techniques that account for temporal structures in the data may reveal subtle ecological relationships that are important for informing and operationalizing EBFM.</p>
<p>We tested the hypothesis that the abundance of demersal stocks in the Celtic Sea from 1997 to 2019 (23 years) was driven by both fishing pressure and the environment. To reduce the risk of identifying spurious relationships and overfitting models we selected variables that characterize key components of the Celtic sea ecosystem based on recent studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Goikoetxea and Irigoien, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Hernvann et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">M&#xe9;rillet et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Eme et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). To account for autocorrelation and non-stationary processes in the data we applied multivariate techniques that account for temporal structures.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>2 Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<title>2.1 Study area, sampling, and taxa</title>
<p>This study focused on demersal shelf communities within the 200m isobath. Data from variables that occurred within the boundary of the study area (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>) were extracted (spatially subset) and used in the analysis, except for the North Atlantic Oscillation index which is a global variable. We used data from the French bottom trawl survey (EVHOE), part of the International Bottom Trawl Survey (IBTS), to calculate catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) because this survey has the greatest spatio-temporal coverage of the Celtic Sea and is a reliable source of fisheries independent data (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">ICES, 2017</xref>). In addition, the survey records non-commercial species (e.g., <italic>Trisopterus</italic> spp.) and the small mesh size (20mm in the cod end) captures small species and juveniles of commercial species whose biomass is underrepresented in fisheries dependent data. The annual survey takes place during the fourth quarter (October-December) and uses the same vessel (RV Thallassa II), gear (GOV 36/47 bottom otter trawl) and sampling strategy for the study period (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">ICES, 2017</xref>). This consistency ensures comparability between consecutive years. Considerable efforts by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Moriarty et&#xa0;al. (2017)</xref> have produced a quality assured version of the EVHOE dataset for the period 1997-2016 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Moriarty and Greenstreet, 2017</xref>). We extended the time series to 2019 using the same procedure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Moriarty et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>) to calculate effort (i.e., swept area) and maintain consistent time series.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Map of study area (bounded by the red line) and the 1534 IBTS haul locations used (black points). Grey line denotes 200m isobath.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-09-978654-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The dataset was spatially subset to the study area resulting in 1534 valid hauls from 1997 to 2019. Biomass (kg) was calculated by summing the weight across all length classes for each taxon in each haul. Swept area (km<sup>2</sup>) was calculated by multiplying wing spread by haul distance for each haul. To calculate annual CPUE values we used the geometric mean because it is scale invariant and less sensitive to outliers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Fraser et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Campbell, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Sala, 2018</xref>). Catch composition varied between hauls with some observations containing zero values so we added an offset of one to all values to calculate the geometric mean. This offset had no impact on the dataset because this study investigated trends in the index of relative abundance (CPUE) and not absolute values. Annualized CPUE series were expressed as biomass per swept area (kg per km<sup>2</sup>). Several species in the Celtic Sea are managed under a single Total Allowable Catch (TAC). For example, black-bellied anglerfish (<italic>Lophius budegessa</italic>) and white anglerfish (<italic>Lophius piscatorius</italic>) are managed under a combined TAC. We combined the CPUE of species that are managed under combined TAC based on the assumption that changes in exploitative patterns imposed on species with combined TACs would manifest as signals in the combined CPUE. CPUEs represented by several species/stocks were anglerfish (ANF; <italic>Lophius piscatorius</italic>, <italic>L. budegassa</italic>), megrim (LEZ; <italic>Lepidorhombus whiffiagonis</italic> and <italic>L. boscii</italic>) and skates and rays (RAJ; <italic>Dipturus batis</italic>, <italic>Leucoraja naevus</italic>, <italic>Raja montagui</italic>, <italic>Raja clavata</italic>, <italic>Raja microocellata</italic>, <italic>Raja brachyura</italic> and <italic>Leucoraja fullonica</italic>). The CPUE at the species level were cod (COD; <italic>Gadus morhua</italic>), haddock (HAD; <italic>Melanogrammus aeglefinus</italic>), whiting (WHG: <italic>Merlangius merlangus</italic>), hake (HKE; <italic>Merluccius merluccius</italic>), lesser-spotted dogfish (SYC; <italic>Scyliorhinus canicula</italic>), sole (SOL; <italic>Solea solea</italic>), plaice (PLE; <italic>Pleuronectes platessa</italic>) and spurdog (DGS; <italic>Squalus acanthias</italic>). Although not managed or commercially exploited, <italic>Trisopterus</italic> spp. are important prey for higher trophic levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Crozier, 1985</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Trenkel et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Gosch et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>) so we combined <italic>Trisopterus minutus</italic>, <italic>T. esmarkii</italic> and <italic>T. luscus</italic> into a combined CPUE (XOD). The IBTS survey did not operate in the Celtic Sea in 2017 due to mechanical failure so the missing time points in 2017 were interpolated using a centered 5-year moving average for each CPUE series.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<title>2.2 Fishing variables</title>
<p>To capture broad trends in fishing pressure in the study area we used fishing exploitation rates (FER) for commercially important stocks delineated by the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES). FER was calculated by dividing instantaneous fishing mortality (F) by the fishing mortality required to achieve Maximum Sustainable Yield (F<sub>MSY</sub>) for stocks whose time series were of sufficient length (i.e., 1997-2019) and where the stock assessment areas were compatible with the study area (i.e., not including stocks which extended well beyond the study area such as hake).We used F/F<sub>MSY</sub> as an indicator of the degree to which stocks were fished sustainably (i.e., F/F<sub>MSY</sub> &#x2264; 1 indicates a sustainably fished stock). Reference values (F and F<sub>MSY</sub>) were sourced from ICES stock assessment summaries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">ICES, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">ICES, 2021</xref>). Further details on the stock assessment models used to calculate F and F<sub>MSY</sub> can be found in the stock assessment summaries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">ICES, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">ICES, 2021</xref>). The ICES Celtic Sea stocks included in the analysis were haddock (had.27.7b-k), megrim (meg.27.7b-k,8abd), plaice (ple.27.7fg), sole (sol.27.7fg) and cod (cod.27.7e-k). Initially, stock-specific F/F<sub>MSY</sub> series were included as separate variables however the trends were remarkably similar (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>) with Pearson&#x2019;s correlation coefficient indicating high degrees of collinearity between haddock, megrim, sole and plaice F/F<sub>MSY</sub> series, r(21) &#x2265;.41, p &#x2264; 0.05 (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). To reduce the risk of overfitting models by introducing too many correlated explanatory variables we used stock-specific catches (landings plus discards) available from the stock assessment summaries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">ICES, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">ICES, 2021</xref>) to calculate a catch weighted mean exploitation rate (FER) for haddock, megrim, plaice and sole stocks (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). This reduced the number of variables that characterized exploitation rates from five to two variables while still capturing the main trends in exploitation patterns.</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Fishing exploitation rates of commercially important Celtic Sea demersal stocks. The mean fishing exploitation rate (FER) represented by the black line is the catch weighted mean of haddock (had.27.7b-k), megrim (meg.27.7b-k8abd), plaice (ple.27.7fg), and sole (sol.27.7fg) exploitation rates. The grey dashed line delineates the upper threshold for a sustainably exploited stock (F/F<sub>MSY</sub> &#x2264; 1).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-09-978654-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Many species are caught together by demersal fisheries in the Celtic Sea and is therefore considered a mixed fishery (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Moore et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). We assumed that the FER derived from stocks with similar exploitation trends would be a suitable metric to characterize the general trend in fishing pressure in the Celtic Sea. The Cod F/F<sub>MSY</sub> series was not significantly correlated, r(21)&lt;.41, p &gt; 0.05, with the haddock, megrim, sole and plaice F/F<sub>MSY</sub> series (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>), so we included cod exploitation rate (FERcod) as a separate explanatory variable. Furthermore, cod is considered a &#x2018;choke&#x2019; species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Ulrich et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">ICES, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">ICES, 2022b</xref>) so low quotas in the Celtic Sea can force vessels to cease fishing without meeting quotas of other target species. The vessels limited by the cod quota would catch fewer demersal species (e.g., haddock, whiting, plaice) consequently reducing the fishing mortality (F) on other demersal species and cause an increase in CPUE.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<title>2.3 Environmental variables</title>
<p>Spatio-temporal data for net primary production (NPP; mg C/m<sup>2</sup>/day) - the rate at which carbon is converted into biomass by photosynthesis - and sea bottom temperature (SBT; &#xb0;C) were sourced from the Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Services (<uri xlink:href="http://marine.copernicus.eu">http://marine.copernicus.eu</uri>). Data of SBT and NPP that occurred within the boundary of the study area were spatially subset to the study area for the period 1997-2019. SBT was included as an explanatory variable because the Celtic Sea contains species with cold-water and warm-water affinities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">ter Hofstede et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Simpson et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). An increase in temperature could, through shifts in species distribution, increase the CPUE of warm-water species and decrease the CPUE of cold-water species in the study area. Annual mean SBT was calculated from the monthly-mean Atlantic-European Iberian-Biscay-Ireland Ocean Physics Reanalysis data product at a spatial resolution of 0.083 x 0.083 decimal degrees. Seasonal stratification of the Celtic Sea limits the transfer of nutrients into the photic zone (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Hickman et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>) so to better capture NPP throughout the water column depth integrated monthly mean NPP values were calculated using values from the surface to the 75m depth stratum. Annual mean NPP was then calculated from the depth integrated monthly values derived from the monthly-mean Atlantic-European Iberian-Biscay-Ireland Ocean Biogeochemistry Reanalysis data product at 0.083 x 0.083 decimal degree resolution.</p>
<p>Calanoid copepods are an important food source for fish larvae (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Cushing, 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Rowlands et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Morote et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>) therefore to represent bottom-up effects of mesozooplankton on CPUE we spatially subset sample level data from the Continuous Plankton Recorder (CPR) survey to the study area (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Johns, 2022</xref>). Mean annual counts of <italic>Calanus helgolandicus</italic> and <italic>C. finmarchicus</italic> were calculated from the monthly means and used to infer abundance.</p>
<p>The North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) index measures the difference in sea-level air pressure between Iceland and Portugal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Hurrell, 1995</xref>) and has been shown to influence abundance of fish stocks in the Irish Sea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bentley et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>) and recruitment in the Celtic Sea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Goikoetxea and Irigoien, 2013</xref>). The Principal Component based NAO index is less sensitive to &#x2018;noise&#x2019; so we used the annual PC-based NAO index (<uri xlink:href="https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu">https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu</uri>) as a proxy for climatic forcing the study area (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Hurrell, 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Hurrell and Deser, 2010</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<title>2.4 Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Dynamic factor analysis (DFA) was used to examine the relationship between demersal CPUE trends and explanatory variables. DFA is a multivariate technique used to detect relationships between a set of short time series (e.g., CPUE series) and explanatory variables while estimating common trend(s) in the unexplained temporal variation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Zuur et&#xa0;al., 2003a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Zuur et&#xa0;al., 2003b</xref>). DFA was identified as the most suitable statistical tool for our data because it can analyze short and non-stationary CPUE series. Furthermore, the common trends identified and CPUE series correlated with the common trend can be informative. For example, the common trend can be compared against time series of variables not included in the optimal model to identify potential associations (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Chen, 2010</xref>) and the composition of species correlated with the common trend may share similar life histories (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Erzini, 2005</xref>). Further technical details on DFA can be found in (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Zuur et&#xa0;al., 2003a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Zuur et&#xa0;al., 2003b</xref>). DFA models are computationally demanding and time consuming because the Akaike&#x2019;s information criterion (AIC) of a set of models containing all possible permutations of explanatory variables, <italic>M</italic> number of common trends and two error covariance matrices are compared to find the &#x2018;best&#x2019; model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Zuur et&#xa0;al., 2003a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Zuur et&#xa0;al., 2003b</xref>) and can produce overfitted models if too many explanatory variables are included as covariates. Therefore, we reduced the set of explanatory variables into a subset of relevant and appropriate explanatory variables using redundancy analysis (RDA). This decreased the number of permutations of explanatory variables required to identify the optimal DFA model and reduced risk of overfitting models. We tested for lagged relationships between CPUE trends and basal productivity (i.e., net primary production and zooplankton abundance) under the assumption that changes to production at lower trophic levels may take several years to manifest as signals in the CPUE trends. Cross correlation coefficients revealed that some lagged effects did exist (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF2">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>), but the majority of cross-correlations were strongest on the observation year, so we did not include lagged variables in the analysis. All variables were standardized prior to analysis by subtracting the mean and dividing by the standard deviation using R v4.1.0 (R <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Core Team, 2021</xref>).</p>
<sec id="s2_4_1">
<title>2.4.1 Identifying the most influential explanatory variables</title>
<p>Redundancy analysis (RDA) is a canonical ordination technique that estimates the relationships between a set of response (e.g., CPUE series) and a set of explanatory variables (e.g., environmental and fishing variables) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">ter Braak, 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Borcard et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). The method computes, in successive order, a series of orthogonal axes consisting of specific linear combinations of explanatory variables that maximize the explained variance in the set of response variables. However, RDA is a regression technique and the autocorrelated processes present in our CPUE series (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF3">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>) violates the assumption that values are independent of each other. To account for the autocorrelated processes in our data within the RDA we applied a restricted permutation test (i.e., cyclic shift permutations) to preserve the temporal ordering of each CPUE series (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Simpson, 2012</xref>). Essentially, this involves picking a random starting point in the CPUE series, linking it to the start of the explanatory variables&#x2019; series (i.e., 1997), computing the F-statistic and then repeating it for every other possible starting point (permutation) of the CPUE series. The observed F-statistic is then compared to a reference distribution of the permuted F-statistics and the <italic>p</italic>-value is the proportion of permuted F-statistic values equal to or larger than the observed F-statistic. The null hypothesis (i.e., no linear relationships exist between the CPUE series and the explanatory variables) is rejected if the <italic>p-</italic>value is equal to or smaller than the predefined significance level (e.g., <italic>&#x3b1;</italic> =0.05). The proportion of variance explained by each explanatory variable was determined by ranking the eigenvalues of RDA models that contained a single but different explanatory variable. To reduce the number of unique combinations of covariates (permutations) in the Dynamic Factor Analysis (DFA) we used the RDA eigenvalues (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>) to identify the four most statistically influential explanatory variables (i.e., mean exploitation rate, <italic>C. finmarchicus</italic> abundance, cod exploitation rate and net primary production). We used four explanatory variables to include in the DFA because it produces a tractable number of models (84) which balances computational time while still best representing the system. Including five explanatory variables would nearly double the number of unique models (150). RDA was conducted using the &#x2018;vegan&#x2019; package v2.6-2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Oksanen et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Marginal effects of the explanatory variables.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Explanatory variable</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Eigenvalue using only one explanatory variable</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Eigenvalue as %</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FER</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FIN</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FERcod</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">20.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">NPP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">HEL</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SBT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">NAO</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>The total sum of eigenvalues is 9.93 and the total variance is 1.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4_2">
<title>2.4.2 Identifying relationships between CPUE and explanatory variables</title>
<p>We used DFA to test for linear relationships between CPUE series and the four most statistically influential explanatory variables identified in the RDA while also identifying common trends in the temporal variation. The procedure for finding the optimal model is to fit a series of models that include combinations with and without the explanatory variables, one to three common trends as well as a diagonal or symmetric non-diagonal error covariance matrix (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Zuur et&#xa0;al., 2003a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Zuur et&#xa0;al., 2003b</xref>). The purpose of comparing models with different error covariance matrices was to determine if accounting for relationships in the error component of the CPUE series improved the model fit. To reduce the risk of overfitting models we limited the maximum number of covariates included in any DFA model to three. The optimal model was selected based on the lowest AIC value and visual inspection of the fitted and residual values (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Zuur et&#xa0;al., 2003a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Zuur et&#xa0;al., 2003b</xref>).The fit of the optimal model to each observational CPUE series, termed the &#x2018;fit ratio&#x2019;, was quantified by dividing the sum-of-squared residuals by the sum-of-squared observations. Lower fit ratios indicate a better model fit. The optimal DFA model had one common trend, with a symmetric non-diagonal matrix and the mean exploitation rate (FER), cod exploitation rate (FERcod) and <italic>C. finmarchicus</italic> abundance (FIN) as covariates (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). To identify whether we could begin to explain the common trend, which in turn could explain some of the variance in the CPUE series, we tested for monotonic associations between explanatory variables not included in the optimal DFA model and the estimated common trend using Spearman&#x2019;s correlation coefficient with R v4.1.0 (R <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Core Team, 2021</xref>). DFA was conducted using the software package Brodgar v2.7.5 (Highland Statistics Ltd, <uri xlink:href="http://www.brodgar.com">http://www.brodgar.com</uri>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<title>3 Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<title>3.1 Observed trends</title>
<p>CPUE series were characterized by interannual variability with several CPUE series showing similar trends (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). The CPUE of spurdog (DGS), haddock (HAD), hake (HKE), megrim (LEZ), plaice (PLE), the skates and rays (RAJ) and lesser-spotted dogfish (SYC) increased since 1997, particularly in the last decade. Cod (COD), whiting (WHG) and <italic>Trisopterus</italic> spp. (XOD) CPUE series remained relatively stable although there appears to be a period of decline since 2015. The CPUE of anglerfish (ANF) and sole (SOL) showed periodic fluctuations although the tendency is towards an increasing CPUE for the study period.</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>CPUE (kg/km<sup>2</sup>) series of anglerfish (ANF), cod (COD), spurdog (DGS), haddock (HAD), hake (HAK), megrim spp. (LEZ), plaice (PLE), skates and rays (RAJ), sole (SOL), lesser-spotted dogfish (SYC), whiting (WHG) and <italic>Trisopterus</italic> spp. (XOD) in the Celtic Sea from 1997 to 2019.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-09-978654-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Patterns in the seven explanatory variables varied across time (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). Mean fishing exploitation rate (FER) increased to its maximum value in 2003 and then gradually decreased until 2019. Cod fishing exploitation rate (FERcod) remained relatively stable until 2005, then decreased to its minimum in 2011 and rapidly increased thereafter. The abundance of the copepod <italic>C. finmarchicus</italic> (FIN) was relatively stable until 2011 but then showed a rapid increase in 2012 which was sustained until 2017. The NAO index displayed a cyclical pattern punctuated by a pronounced negative phase in 2010. Net primary production (NPP) remained relatively stable but showed a period of rapid decline from 2003 to 2006 but then increased to its maximum in 2008 and remained relatively stable thereafter. Sea bottom temperature (SBT) and the abundance of the copepod <italic>C. helgolandicus</italic> (HEL) experienced a rapid decline during the same period as NPP (2003-2006) and the pronounced negative phase of the NAO in 2010 coincided with the lowest SBT value (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Time series of explanatory variables. Catch weighted mean fishing exploitation rate (FER), cod exploitation rate (FERcod), North Atlantic Oscillation index (NAO), net primary production (NPP), sea bottom temperature (SBT) and the relative abundance of <italic>C. finmarchicus</italic> (FIN) and <italic>C. helgolandicus</italic> (HEL).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-09-978654-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<title>3.2 Influential explanatory variables</title>
<p>The F-statistic of the RDA model was significantly greater (F=3.124, <italic>p</italic> = 0.043) than the F-statistics of the 22 restricted permutations (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF4">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). The adjusted R<sup>2</sup> value indicates that 40.3% of the temporal variation in the CPUE series can be explained using seven ordination axes, each axis consisting of a specific linear combination of the explanatory variables. The linear combination specific to the first ordination axis (RDA1) explained 23.9% of the explained variance and the second axis (RDA2) explained 8.4%. We are confident that the RDA captured the dominant trends because the first constrained eigenvalue (RDA1 = 4.22) was much greater than the first unconstrained eigenvalue (PC1 = 1.83). The ranking of the marginal effects indicated that FER, FERcod, FIN and NPP should be included as explanatory variables in the DFA (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Model structure and AIC values for DFA models with 1-3 common trends and 0-3 covariates.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">&#xa0;</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="6" align="center">Number of trends (<italic>M</italic>)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Model</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="3" align="center">Diagonal matrix</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="3" align="center">Symmetric non-diagonal matrix</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Covariates</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">M common trends + noise</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">721.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">689.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">661.73</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">685.78</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">677.64</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">681.48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" colspan="7" align="left">M common trends + covariates + noise</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Mean (F/F<sub>MSY</sub>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">684.81</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">662.94</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">664.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">659.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">665.77</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">679.24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Cod (F/F<sub>MSY</sub>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">709.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">671.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">669.85</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">675.71</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">673.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">684.53</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;FIN</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">696.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">667.99</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">652.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">677.78</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">670.60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">674.58</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;NPP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">728.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">690.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">663.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">693.95</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">684.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">677.53</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Mean (F/F<sub>MSY</sub>) + Cod (F/F<sub>MSY</sub>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">668.60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">654.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">657.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">642.46</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">656.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">672.36</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Mean (F/F<sub>MSY</sub>) + FIN</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">672.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">644.72</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">651.77</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">654.52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">660.97</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">677.57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Mean (F/F<sub>MSY</sub>) + NPP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">682.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">662.78</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">663.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">667.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">659.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">670.43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;FIN + NPP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">696.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">669.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">653.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">685.77</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">675.93</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">673.81</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Cod (F/F<sub>MSY</sub>) + NPP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">718.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">674.54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">670.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">682.86</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">677.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">683.07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Cod (F/F<sub>MSY</sub>) + FIN</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">675.42</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">657.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">661.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">667.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">665.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">684.29</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Cod (F/F<sub>MSY</sub>) + NPP + FIN</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">677.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">658.88</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">661.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">674.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">672.77</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">678.78</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Mean (F/F<sub>MSY</sub>) + FIN + NPP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">672.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">644.60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">654.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">662.54</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">656.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">674.52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Mean (F/F<sub>MSY</sub>) + Cod (F/F<sub>MSY</sub>) + FIN</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">643.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">644.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">641.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>635.48</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">649.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">671.55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2003;Mean (F/F<sub>MSY</sub>) + Cod (F/F<sub>MSY</sub>) + NPP</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">668.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">653.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">655.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">648.71</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">647.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">658.59</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>The model with the lowest AIC and selected for inference is emboldened.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>In the RDA correlation triplot, the direction and orthogonality between vectors (i.e., CPUE series and explanatory variables) and ordination axes (i.e., RDA1, RDA2) represent their linear correlations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). The explanatory variables associated with the first axis (RDA1) were mean fishing exploitation rate (FER) and, to a lesser extent, cod exploitation rate (FERcod) and net primary production (NPP). The abundance of <italic>C. finmarchicus</italic> (FIN) was the dominant explanatory variable for the second axis (RDA2). Overall, the marginal effects (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>) and the orthogonality and magnitude of vectors in the correlation triplot indicated that the least influential explanatory variables were sea bottom temperature (SBT), <italic>C</italic>. <italic>helgolandicus</italic> (HEL) and the North Atlantic Oscillation index (NAO) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). The CPUE of megrim (LEZ), spurdog (DGS), lesser-spotted dogfish (SYC), the skates and rays (RAJ), sole (SOL), hake (HKE), haddock (HAD) and plaice (PLE) increased as mean fishing exploitation (FER) decreased. In addition, the CPUE of anglerfish (ANF) and the skates and rays (RAJ) increased with cod exploitation rate (FERcod) whereas the CPUE of cod (COD), whiting (WHG) and <italic>Trisopterus</italic> spp. (XOD) decreased. The CPUE of plaice, haddock and hake increased with <italic>C. finmarchicus</italic> abundance (FIN) and net primary production (NPP).</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>RDA correlation triplot of CPUE series (black) constrained by explanatory variables (red). The direction and orthogonality between vectors and ordination axes indicate the direction and strength of the linear correlations.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-09-978654-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<title>3.3 Relationships between CPUE and explanatory variables</title>
<p>The optimal DFA model had one common trend, with a symmetric non-diagonal matrix and with mean exploitation rate (FER), cod exploitation rate (FERcod) and <italic>C. finmarchicus</italic> (FIN) as covariates (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). As DFA is a dimension reduction technique it is unlikely that every CPUE series is fitted well. The small fit ratios of lesser-spotted dogfish (0.16), plaice (0.21), skates and rays (0.21), megrim (0.24), hake (0.32), spurdog (0.35) and the moderate fit ratios of haddock (0.4), whiting (0.42) and anglerfish (0.48) indicate that the majority of the CPUE series were modelled reasonably well. However, the large fit ratios of <italic>Trisopterus</italic> spp. (0.69), sole (0.67) and cod (0.61) suggests that the covariates and the common trend included in the optimal model did not fully capture the temporal variation in their respective CPUE series. Overall, the mean of the twelve CPUE series fit ratios (0.40) indicated that the DFA model fit was adequate and captured most of the temporal variation in the CPUE series (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Observed values (open circles) and the model fit (black line) obtained by the DFA model with one common trend, symmetrical non-diagonal matrix with mean exploitation rate (FER), cod exploitation rate (FERcod) and <italic>C. finmarchicus</italic> abundance (FIN) as covariates. Units are expressed as standard deviations from the mean.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-09-978654-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Many of the CPUE series had a significant relationship with at least one covariate, particularly the mean fishing exploitation rate (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). The CPUE of the skates and rays, cod, spurdog, hake, megrim and plaice increased when the mean fishing exploitation rate decreased whereas the CPUE of whiting decreased. The regression coefficients indicate that the negative relationship was strongest for two of the three elasmobranch CPUE series (i.e., spurdog, skates and rays). As expected, the CPUE series of cod, whiting, plaice and <italic>Trisopterus</italic> spp. increased when cod fishing exploitation decreased. However, the CPUE of anglerfish, spurdog, and particularly the skates and rays increased when cod exploitation rate increased. The CPUE of hake, plaice and particularly whiting increased when the abundance of <italic>C. finmarchicus</italic> increased in the plankton. Most of the significant relationships identified by the regression component of the DFA model (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>) can also be inferred upon visual inspection of the RDA correlation triplot (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>) although there were some notable discrepancies. The DFA model identified significant relationships between cod, whiting and FER whereas the cod, whiting and FER vectors in the RDA correlation triplot were approximately orthogonal indicating no association. The same discrepancy between the two methods was also observed between the FERcod and plaice. DFA is better suited to analyzing relationships between non-stationary time series (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Zuur et&#xa0;al., 2003a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Zuur et&#xa0;al., 2003b</xref>) so our inferences are based on the results of the optimal DFA model (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>FAO Code, fit ratio, estimated regression coefficients, standard errors (s.e.) and <italic>t</italic>-values for each CPUE series in the optimal DFA model.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" rowspan="2" align="left">CPUE series</th>
<th valign="top" rowspan="2" align="left">Code</th>
<th valign="top" rowspan="2" align="left">Fit Ratio</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="3" align="left">Mean F/F<sub>MSY</sub>
</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="3" align="left">Cod F/F<sub>MSY</sub>
</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="3" align="left">
<italic>C. finmarchicus</italic>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Estimate</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">s.e.</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">
<italic>t-</italic>value</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Estimate</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">s.e.</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">
<italic>t-</italic>value</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Estimate</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">s.e.</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">
<italic>t-</italic>value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Anglerfish</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">ANF</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.48</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.45</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.99</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>2.38</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-2.02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Cod</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">COD</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.56</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>-2.52</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.59</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>-3.18</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Spurdog</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DGS</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.71</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>-4.00</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>2.79</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.29</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Haddock</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HAD</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.40</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.87</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hake</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">HKE</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>-2.46</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>2.58</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Megrim spp</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">LEZ</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.66</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>-4.70</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.85</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-1.95</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Plaice</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PLE</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>-2.30</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>-2.21</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.58</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>4.89</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Skates and ray</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">RAJ</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.71</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>-5.79</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>5.28</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-1.98</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sole</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">SOL</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.99</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lesser spotted dogfish</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">SYC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.94</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.97</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Whiting</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">WHG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.42</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>3.60</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>-2.58</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.85</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>5.10</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>Trisopterus</italic> spp</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">XOD</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.69</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.46</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>-2.45</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.37</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Statistically significant values are emboldened (df = 19, t&#x2265;2.093, p&#x2264; 0.05).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The common trend captured a single underlying pattern in the unexplained temporal variation of the CPUE series. The trend increased steadily from 1997 until 2010, remained relatively stable until 2012, then decreased to 2014 and subsequently increased to 2019 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7A</bold>
</xref>). The significant canonical correlations between the CPUE series and the common trend show that haddock (HAD), hake (HKE), megrim (LEZ), plaice (PLE), sole (SOL) and particularly lesser-spotted dogfish (SYC) were positively associated with the common trend (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7B</bold>
</xref>). The common trend is informative because its pattern may resemble the trend of a latent variable that is influencing the canonically correlated CPUE series.</p>
<fig id="f7" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;7</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(A)</bold> Common trend estimated from optimal DFA model; <bold>(B)</bold> Canonical correlations between each CPUE series and the common trend. Canonical correlations greater or less than 0.413 (vertical dashed line) indicate CPUE series were significantly correlated (&#x3b1; = 0.05) with the common trend.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-09-978654-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The Spearman&#x2019;s rank correlation test used to identify monotonic associations between the common trend and explanatory variables not included in the optimal DFA model indicated that the exploitation rate (F/F<sub>MSY</sub>) of white angler (FP White Angler), whiting (FP Whiting), and the northern hake (FP N. Hake) ICES stocks had significant negative monotonic associations with the common trend (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). This suggests that the CPUE of haddock, hake, megrim, plaice, sole and lesser-spotted dogfish increased as the exploitation rate of whiting, white angler, and the northern hake stocks decreased.</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Spearman&#x2019;s correlation between the common trend and explanatory variables not included in the optimal model.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Variable</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">df</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Spearman <italic>r</italic>
</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">
<italic>p</italic>-value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">NPP</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.328</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">NAO</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.578</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SBT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.101</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FP White Angler</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>0.004</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FP N. Hake</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.82</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>&lt;0.001</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">FP Whiting</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.64</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>0.002</bold>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Statistically significant values are emboldened.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>4 Discussion</title>
<p>Our results show that fishing was the dominant driver of CPUE from 1997 to 2019 and that the gradual reduction in exploitation rates (F/F<sub>MSY</sub>) probably led to the partial recovery of managed (i.e., cod, hake, megrim, plaice, and whiting) and unmanaged populations (i.e., <italic>Trisopterus</italic> spp., spurdog, and skates and rays). We also detected a positive relationship between the abundance of <italic>C. finmarchicus</italic> in the plankton and the CPUE of hake, plaice, and whiting. Net primary production (NPP), sea bottom temperature (SBT) and the abundance of the copepod <italic>C. helgolandicus</italic> (HEL) appear to have cyclical patterns but remained relatively stable from 1997 to 2019. Our results agree with findings from the Celtic Sea Ecopath with Ecosim model which identified fishing as the primary driver of observed ecosystem change from 1985 to 2016 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Hernvann et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<sec id="s4_1">
<title>4.1 Trends</title>
<p>A steady decrease in the exploitation rates (F/F<sub>MSY</sub>) of several commercially important ICES stocks (i.e., haddock, megrim, plaice and sole) was observed during the study period 1997-2019. The fishing mortality (F) of plaice achieved F<sub>MSY</sub> in 2010 whereas the fishing mortality of megrim, haddock and sole were closest to their respective F<sub>MSY</sub> reference values in 2019. The fishing mortality rate of cod was double the rate required to achieve F<sub>MSY</sub> for most of the study period and rapidly increased after 2016. Unfortunately, cod is often caught as bycatch and despite zero catch advice in 2019 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">ICES, 2021</xref>) fishing mortality was three times greater than F<sub>MSY</sub>. The copepod <italic>C. helgolandicus</italic> was the dominant copepod in the Celtic Sea, indicative of changes in mesozooplankton biomass, but we did not identify any significant relationships with the CPUE series. The abundance of <italic>C. helgolandicus</italic> was relatively stable compared to <italic>C. finmarchicus</italic> for the study period. The <italic>C. finmarchicus</italic> time series showed a marked increase in 2011 where it remained at high levels until 2017. Sea bottom temperature and the abundance of <italic>C. helgolandicus</italic> experienced a rapid decline during the same period as net primary production (2003-2007). C. <italic>helgolandicus</italic> is a warm-water copepod and therefore reduced abundances are likely due to decreasing water temperatures and reduced basal productivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Montero et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<title>4.2 Effects of fishing</title>
<p>Our ecological time series begins in 1997 so inferences are in the context of an already depleted ecosystem subject to intensive fishing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Gu&#xe9;nette and Gascuel, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Gascuel et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). Relationships inferred from the regression component of the DFA model show that the CPUE of cod, spurdog, hake, megrim, plaice and particularly the skates and rays increased when mean exploitation rate (FER) decreased. Furthermore, the CPUE of stocks whose reference points were excluded from the mean exploitation rate metric (i.e., cod, spurdog, hake and the skates and rays) also increased when the mean exploitation rate decreased. The Celtic Sea demersal fishery is considered highly mixed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Moore et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">ICES, 2022b</xref>) so it is possible that management measures, or any other change in exploitation patterns, imposed on one species influences other members of the demersal community that are often caught together (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Ulrich et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). This result is important for informing EBFM because it demonstrates that exploitation patterns imposed on one species or stock has the potential to have effects on all species caught together with commercial bottom trawling gear (e.g., hake, spurdog and the skates and rays). Modifying fishing behavior (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Reid et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Calderwood et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>), improving gear selectivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Fonseca et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Kynoch et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>) and possibly including spurdog, hake and the skates and rays into Celtic Sea mixed fisheries advice may achieve the desired outcome of balanced harvesting (i.e., targeting strong stocks and avoiding weak stocks).</p>
<p>Interestingly, the CPUE of whiting increased with mean exploitation rate. This positive relationship was unexpected, it is possible that whiting benefit from the removal of competitors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Temming et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Rowlands et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>) and predators (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">ICES, 1997</xref>) at various life stages. Further studies using additional time points are required to verify this possible interspecific relationship. The positive relationship between cod exploitation rate and the CPUE of anglerfish, spurdog and the skates and rays were contrary to our expectation that reducing fishing pressure on a &#x2018;choke&#x2019; species would increase the CPUE of other demersal fish. Cod have a broad diet that shifts ontogenetically (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Pinnegar et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Link et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>) and their diet consists of several species (e.g., whiting, haddock, megrim, <italic>Trisopterus</italic> spp.) included in this study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">ICES, 1997</xref>). We did not find evidence in the literature that cod actively predate on spurdog, anglerfish, skates, and rays but we speculate that these species may be released from competition pressure by the removal of cod from the community.</p>
<p>It is important to highlight that, despite being the longest consistent fisheries independent time series available for the Celtic Sea, the CPUE series are relatively short and therefore the analyses and conclusions may be sensitive to influential observations. For example, the cod exploitation and the CPUE of anglerfish, spurdog and the skates and rays showed a rapid increase at the end of their respective time series which may have led to detection of a positive relationship. However, the negative relationship between cod exploitation rate and the CPUE of cod and other demersal species often caught together (e.g., whiting, plaice and <italic>Trisopterus</italic> spp.) suggests that these relationships are biologically meaningful. Longer time series of data would be needed to confirm these findings, but this should not prevent this type of analysis being explored.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<title>4.3 Effects of zooplankton</title>
<p>We observed that the CPUE of plaice, hake and whiting increased when the abundance of <italic>C. finmarchicus</italic> increased in the plankton. We assume that the positive relationship is linked to recruitment success because the Celtic Sea is an important nursery area for these species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Dransfeld et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Ellis et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>) and the larvae and juveniles of plaice, hake and whiting are known to feed on several stages of calanoid copepods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Ryland, 1964</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Fj&#xf8;sne, 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Rowlands et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Morote et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). The calanoid copepods <italic>C. finmarchicus</italic> and <italic>C. helgolandicus</italic> co-occur in the Celtic Sea but the cold-water <italic>C. finmarchicus</italic> reaches maximum abundance earlier in the year (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Planque and Fromentin, 1996</xref>). Recruitment success has been linked to the synchronous timings of fish larvae and prey availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Cushing, 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Beaugrand et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>) and declines in the abundance of <italic>C. finmarchicus</italic> have been linked to the low survival of fish larvae in the North Sea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Beaugrand et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">van Deurs et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>).</p>
<p>The underlying mechanism remains unclear but we speculate that years with relatively high abundances of <italic>C. finmarchicus</italic> in the zooplankton (e.g., 2011-2017) improved fish recruitment success because the timing of <italic>C. finmarchicus</italic> spring bloom (i.e., period of high biomass) and the spawning of whiting, hake and plaice (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Coombs and Mitchell, 1982</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Heessen et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>) may have been better matched. It is also possible that <italic>C. finmarchicus</italic> is an energetically favorable food which has been shown in the North Sea to influence the probability of occurrence of cod (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Beaugrand and Kirby, 2010</xref>). We recommend future studies include the seasonal timings of zooplankton abundance into an ecological time series to verify this suggestion.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_4">
<title>4.4 Patterns in the unexplained</title>
<p>The common trend represents an underlying pattern in the temporal variation of the CPUE time series that was not explained by fishing or the abundance of <italic>C. finmarchicus</italic>. Haddock, hake, megrim, plaice, sole and lesser-spotted dogfish CPUE series were positively correlated with the common trend which implies that their CPUE series were affected by a common latent variable. Spearman&#x2019;s rank correlations between the common trend and omitted variables identified the exploitation rates of white angler, whiting and the northern hake stocks as potential drivers of haddock, hake, megrim, plaice, sole and lesser-spotted dogfish CPUE series. This further substantiates our finding that exploitation patterns on single-species stocks influence other members of the Celtic Sea demersal community, and that hake, megrim, plaice, lesser-spotted dogfish, and sole should be considered in Celtic Sea mixed fisheries advice.</p>
<p>In conclusion, our ecosystem assessment of the fisheries ecology of the Celtic Sea has shown that the abundance, inferred from CPUE, of cod, hake, megrim, plaice, whiting, <italic>Trisopterus</italic> spp., anglerfish, spurdog and the skates and rays were mainly driven by exploitation patterns (i.e., fishing mortality in relation to F<sub>MSY</sub>) from 1997 to 2019. We also observed that potentially important ecosystem drivers (e.g., net primary production, sea bottom temperature and the NAO) did not influence CPUE as much as fishing, although the abundance of <italic>C. finmarchicus</italic> did appear to affect plaice, hake, and whiting. Even though NPP did not influence CPUE as much as fishing or <italic>C. finmarchicus</italic> its relevance to the stocks should not be overlooked because it could have direct and indirect effects (e.g., through zooplankton) on larval survival and fish recruitment. In part, the general lack of influence of external ecosystem variables is likely due to the environmental variables (i.e., NPP, SBT, NAO) not exhibiting any obvious trends across the study period. We infer from our findings that in the Celtic Sea the recovery of cod, spurdog, hake, megrim, plaice, whiting, <italic>Trisopterus</italic> spp. and the skates and rays remains dependent on controlling fishing mortality, and this would not, at least for now, be confounded by environmental conditions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: Atlantic-European Iberian-Biscay-Ireland Ocean Physics Reanalysis, Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Services, <uri xlink:href="https://resources.marine.copernicus.eu/product-detail/IBI_MULTIYEAR_PHY_005_002/DATA-ACCESS">https://resources.marine.copernicus.eu/product-detail/IBI_MULTIYEAR_PHY_005_002/DATA-ACCESS</uri>; Atlantic-European Iberian-Biscay-Ireland Ocean Biogeochemistry Reanalysis, Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Services, <uri xlink:href="https://resources.marine.copernicus.eu/product-detail/IBI_MULTIYEAR_BGC_005_003/DATA-ACCESS">https://resources.marine.copernicus.eu/product-detail/IBI_MULTIYEAR_BGC_005_003/DATA-ACCESS</uri>; National Center for Atmospheric Research. <uri xlink:href="https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/climate-data/hurrell-north-atlantic-oscillation-nao-index-pc-based">https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/climate-data/hurrell-north-atlantic-oscillation-nao-index-pc-based</uri>; Continuous Plankton Recorder Survey. <uri xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17031/1812">https://doi.org/10.17031/1812</uri>; Stock Assessment outputs: Working Group for the Bay of Biscay and the Iberian Waters Ecoregion - <uri xlink:href="http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication%20Reports/Forms/DispForm.aspx?ID=36841">http://www.ices.dk/sites/pub/Publication Reports/Forms/DispForm.aspx?ID=36841</uri>, Working Group for the Celtic Seas Ecoregion -<uri xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17895/ICES.PUB.5978">https://doi.org/10.17895/ICES.PUB.5978</uri>. Celtic Sea Groundfish Survey Monitoring and Assessment Data Products. <uri xlink:href="http://doi.org/10.7489/1958-1">http://doi.org/10.7489/1958-1</uri>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>JK, PB, ER, and DR contributed to conception and design of study. JK organized the data, performed the analysis and wrote the original draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>Funding was received from the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (DAFM) 2015 Competitive Call for Research (15/S/744). This research was carried out with the support of the Marine Institute under the Marine Research Programme with the support of the Irish Government (NET/22/56).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.978654/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.978654/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_1.jpeg" id="SF1" mimetype="image/jpeg">
<label>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Pair plot of megrim (meg.27.7b-k,8abd), haddock (had.27.7b-k), sole (sol.27.7fg), plaice (ple.27.7fg) and cod (cod.27.7e-k) fishing exploitation rates (F/F<sub>MSY</sub>). Lower diagonal contains correlation plots; diagonal contains density plot and histogram, and the upper triangle contains the spearman correlation coefficients (<italic>r</italic>). Statistical significance is denoted by: *** p =0.001, ** p=0.01, *p=0.05.</p>
</caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_2.jpeg" id="SF2" mimetype="image/jpeg">
<label>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Cross correlations between CPUE series and lagged series (0-3 years) of NPP (black), <italic>Calanus helgolandicus (grey) and Calanus finmarchicus</italic> (white). Dashed lines denote upper and lower threshold of statistical significance (<italic>&#x3b1;</italic> = 0.05).</p>
</caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_3.jpeg" id="SF3" mimetype="image/jpeg">
<label>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Relationship between CPUE series and lagged values (lag 0-3). Dashed lines denote upper and lower threshold of statistical significance (<italic>&#x3b1;</italic> = 0.05).</p>
</caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_4.jpeg" id="SF4" mimetype="image/jpeg">
<label>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Reference distribution of permuted F-statistics and the F-statistic of the observed series (black vertical line). The calculated <italic>p</italic>-value (1/22) was 0.043.</p>
</caption>
</supplementary-material>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Babyak</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>What you see may not be what you get: A brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models</article-title>. <source>Psychosom. Med.</source> <volume>11</volume>
<issue>3</issue>, <fpage>411</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>421</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Baudron</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brunel</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blanchet</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hidalgo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chust</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Changing fish distributions challenge the effective management of European fisheries</article-title>. <source>Ecography</source> <volume>43</volume>
<issue>4</issue>, <fpage>494</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>505</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ecog.04864</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Beaugrand</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>The north Sea regime shift: Evidence, causes, mechanisms and consequences</article-title>. <source>Prog. Oceanogr.</source> <volume>60</volume>
<issue>2-4</issue>, <fpage>245</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>262</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pocean.2004.02.018</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Beaugrand</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brander</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alistair Lindley</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Souissi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reid</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Plankton effect on cod recruitment in the north Sea</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>426</volume>, <fpage>661</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>664</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature02164</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Beaugrand</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kirby</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Climate, plankton and cod</article-title>. <source>Glob. Change Biol.</source> <volume>16</volume>
<issue>4</issue>, <fpage>1268</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1280</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02063.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bentley</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Serpetti</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fox</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heymans</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reid</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Retrospective analysis of the influence of environmental drivers on commercial stocks and fishing opportunities in the Irish Sea</article-title>. <source>Fish. Oceanogr.</source> <volume>29</volume>
<issue>5</issue>, <fpage>415</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>435</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/fog.12486</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bindoff</surname> <given-names>N. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheung</surname> <given-names>W. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kairo</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ar&#xed;stegui</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guinder</surname> <given-names>V. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hallberg</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Changing ocean, marine ecosystems, and dependent communities</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>IPCC special report on the ocean and cryosphere in a changing climate</source>, (<publisher-loc>Geneva, Switzerland</publisher-loc>:<publisher-name>IPCC</publisher-name>)<fpage>477</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>587</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Blanchard</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>LeLoc&#x2019;h</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hily</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boucher</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Fishing effects on diversity, size and community structure of the benthic invertebrate and fish megafauna on the bay of Biscay coast of France</article-title>. <source>Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.</source> <volume>280</volume>, <fpage>249</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>260</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3354/meps280249</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Borcard</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gillet</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Legendre</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Canonical ordination</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Numerical ecology with r. 2nd edn</source> (<publisher-loc>Cham</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>), <fpage>203</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>297</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-319-71404-2_6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Calderwood</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Robert</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pawlowski</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vermard</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Radford</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Catchpole</surname> <given-names>T. L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Hotspot mapping in the celtic Sea: An interactive tool using multinational data to optimise fishing practices</article-title>. <source>Mar. Policy</source> <volume>116</volume>, <elocation-id>103511</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103511</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Campbell</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Constructing stock abundance indices from catch and effort data: Some nuts and bolts</article-title>. <source>Fish. Res.</source> <volume>161</volume>, <fpage>109</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>130</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fishres.2014.07.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Abundance trends of two neon flying squid (Ommastrephes bartramii) stocks in the north pacific</article-title>. <source>ICES J. Mar. Sci.</source> <volume>67</volume>
<issue>7</issue>, <fpage>1336</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1345</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/icesjms/fsq063</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Coombs</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mitchell</surname> <given-names>C. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1982</year>). <article-title>The development rate of eggs and larvae of the hake, merluccius merluccius (L.) and their distribution to the west of the British isles</article-title>. <source>ICES J. Mar. Sci.</source> <volume>40</volume>
<issue>2</issue>, <fpage>119</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>126</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/icesjms/40.2.119</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Core Team</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <source>R: A language and environment for statistical computing</source> (<publisher-loc>Vienna, Austria</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>R Foundation for Statistical Computing</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Crozier</surname> <given-names>W. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>Observations on the food and feeding of the angler-fish, lophim piscatorius l., in the northern Irish Sea</article-title>. <source>J. Fish Biol.</source> <volume>27</volume>
<issue>5</issue>, <fpage>655</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>665</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1095-8649.1985.tb03210.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cushing</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Plankton production and year-class strength in fish populations: an update of the Match/Mismatch hypothesis</article-title>. <source>Adv. Mar. Biol.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>249</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>293</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0065-2881(08)60202-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dransfeld</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dwane</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McCarney</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kelly</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Danilowicz</surname> <given-names>B. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fives</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Larval distribution of commercial fish species in waters around Ireland</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Irish Fisheries investigations no. 13</source> (<publisher-loc>Ireland</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Marine Institute</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ellis</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Milligan</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Readdy</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Spawning and nursery grounds of selected fish species in UK waters</article-title>. <source>Sci. Ser. Tech. Rep.</source> (CEFAS, Lowestoft) <volume>147</volume>, <page-range>19&#x2013;46</page-range>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Eme</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rufino</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trenkel</surname> <given-names>V. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vermard</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Laffargue</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Petitgas</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Contrasted spatio-temporal changes in the demersal fish assemblages and the dominance of the environment vs fishing pressure, in the bay of Biscay and celtic Sea</article-title>. <source>Prog. Oceanogr.</source> <volume>204</volume>, <elocation-id>102788</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pocean.2022.102788</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Eriksen</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Skjoldal</surname> <given-names>H. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gj&#xf8;s&#xe6;ter</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Primicerio</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Spatial and temporal changes in the barents Sea pelagic compartment during the recent warming</article-title>. <source>Prog. Oceanog.</source> <volume>151</volume>, <fpage>206</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>226</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pocean.2016.12.009</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Erzini</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Trends in NE Atlantic landings (southern portugal): Identifying the relative importance of fisheries and environmental variables</article-title>. <source>Fish Oceanogr.</source> <volume>14</volume>
<issue>3</issue>, <fpage>195</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>209</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2419.2005.00332.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>European Commission</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Council regulation (EC) no 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the common fisheries policy ((EC) no 2371/2002)</article-title>. <source>Off. J. Eur. Communities.</source> (<publisher-loc>Brussels</publisher-loc>:<publisher-name>Official Journal of the European Union</publisher-name>) <volume>45</volume>, <page-range>59&#x2013;80</page-range>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>European Parliament and European Council</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Regulation on the common fisheries policy, amending council regulations (EC) no 1954/2003 and (EC) no 1224/2009 and repealing council regulations (EC) no 2371/2002 and (EC) no 639/2004 and council decision 2004/585/EC ((EU) no 1380/2013))</article-title>. <source>Off. J. Eur. Union.</source> (<publisher-loc>Brussels</publisher-loc>:<publisher-name>Official Journal of the European Union</publisher-name>) <volume>56</volume>, <page-range>22&#x2013;61</page-range>). doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3000/19770677.L_2013.354.eng</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fernandes</surname> <given-names>P. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cook</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Reversal of fish stock decline in the northeast Atlantic</article-title>. <source>Curr. Biol.</source> <volume>23</volume>
<issue>15</issue>, <fpage>1432</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1437</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cub.2013.06.016</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fj&#xf8;sne</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Dietary composition and the potential of food competition between 0-group cod (Gadus morhua l.) and some other fish species in the littoral zone</article-title>. <source>ICES J. Mar. Sci.</source> <volume>53</volume>
<issue>5</issue>, <fpage>757</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>770</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/jmsc.1996.0097</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fonseca</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Campos</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mendes</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Larsen</surname> <given-names>R. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Potential use of a nordm&#xf8;re grid for by-catch reduction in a Portuguese bottom-trawl multispecies fishery</article-title>. <source>Fish. Res.</source> <volume>73</volume>
<issue>1-2</issue>, <fpage>49</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>66</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fishres.2005.01.005</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fraser</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Greenstreet</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Piet</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Taking account of catchability in groundfish survey trawls: Implications for estimating demersal fish biomass</article-title>. <source>ICES J. Mar. Sci.</source> <volume>64</volume>
<issue>9</issue>, <fpage>1800</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1819</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/icesjms/fsm145</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gascuel</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coll</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fox</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gu&#xe9;nette</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guitton</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kenny</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Fishing impact and environmental status in European seas: A diagnosis from stock assessments and ecosystem indicators</article-title>. <source>Fish Fish.</source> <volume>17</volume>
<issue>1</issue>, <fpage>31</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>55</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/faf.12090</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Goikoetxea</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Irigoien</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Links between the recruitment success of northern European hake (Merluccius merluccius l.) and a regime shift on the NE Atlantic continental shelf</article-title>. <source>Fish Oceanogr.</source> <volume>22</volume>
<issue>6</issue>, <fpage>459</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>476</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/fog.12033</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gosch</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hernandez-Milian</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rogan</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jessopp</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cronin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Grey seal diet analysis in Ireland highlights the importance of using multiple diagnostic features</article-title>. <source>Aquat. Biol.</source> <volume>20</volume>
<issue>2</issue>, <fpage>155</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>167</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3354/ab00553</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gu&#xe9;nette</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gascuel</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Shifting baselines in European fisheries: The case of the celtic Sea and bay of Biscay</article-title>. <source>Ocean Coast. Manag.</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>10</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>21</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.06.010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Heessen</surname> <given-names>H. J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Daan</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ellis</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <source>Fish atlas of the celtic Sea, north Sea, and Baltic Sea: Based on international research-vessel surveys</source> (<publisher-loc>Wageningen</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Wageningen Academic Publishers</publisher-name>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3920/978-90-8686-878-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Heinze</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dunkler</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Five myths about variable selection</article-title>. <source>Transpl. Int.</source> <volume>30</volume>
<issue>1</issue>, <fpage>6</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/tri.12895</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hernvann</surname> <given-names>P. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gascuel</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Exploring the impacts of fishing and environment on the celtic Sea ecosystem since 1950</article-title>. <source>Fish. Res.</source> <volume>225</volume>, <elocation-id>105472</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fishres.2019.105472</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hernvann</surname> <given-names>P. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gascuel</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gr&#xfc;ss</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Druon</surname> <given-names>J. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kopp</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perez</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The celtic Sea through time and space: Ecosystem modeling to unravel fishing and climate change impacts on food-web structure and dynamics</article-title>. <source>Front. Mar. Sci.</source> <volume>7</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmars.2020.578717</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hickman</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moore</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharples</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lucas</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tilstone</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Krivtsov</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Primary production and nitrate uptake within the seasonal thermocline of a stratified shelf sea</article-title>. <source>Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.</source> <volume>463</volume>, <fpage>39</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>57</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3354/meps09836</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hurrell</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Decadal trends in the north Atlantic oscillation: Regional temperatures and precipitation</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>269</volume>
<issue>5224</issue>, <fpage>676</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>679</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.269.5224.676</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hurrell</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deser</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>North Atlantic climate variability: The role of the north Atlantic oscillation</article-title>. <source>J. Mar. Syst.</source> <volume>79</volume>
<issue>3-4</issue>, <fpage>231</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>244</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmarsys.2009.11.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hutchinson</surname> <given-names>G. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1957</year>). <article-title>Concluding remarks</article-title>. <source>Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>415</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>427</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/SQB.1957.022.01.039</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>ICES</collab>
</person-group> (<year>1997</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Database report of the stomach sampling project 1991</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>ICES cooperative research report</source>. <volume>219</volume>, <page-range>422</page-range> (<publisher-loc>Copenhagen</publisher-loc>:<publisher-name>ICES</publisher-name>).  doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17895/ices.pub.4626</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>ICES</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Manual of the IBTS north Eastern Atlantic surveys</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Series of ICES survey protocols SISP 15(v4)</source> (<publisher-loc>Copenhagen</publisher-loc>:<publisher-name>ICES</publisher-name>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17895/ices.pub.3519</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>ICES</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Working group for the bay of Biscay and the Iberian waters ecoregion (WGBIE)</article-title>. <source>ICES Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>49</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17895/ices.pub.6033</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>ICES</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Report of the working group for the celtic seas ecoregion (WGCSE)</article-title>. <source>ICES Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>40</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17895/ICES.PUB.5978</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>ICES</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>a). <article-title>Third workshop on integrated trend analysis to support integrated ecosystem assessment (WKINTRA-3)</article-title>. <source>ICES Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>32</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17895/ICES.PUB.19398317</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>ICES</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>b). <article-title>Working group on mixed fisheries advice (WGMIXFISH-ADVICE)</article-title>. <source>ICES Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>4</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17895/ices.pub.9379</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Johns</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <source>Selected CPR data for European shelf seas standard areas 1980-2019 as recorded by the continuous plankton recorder survey</source> (<publisher-loc>Plymouth, MA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CPR survey. The Archive for Marine Species and Habitats Data (DASSH</publisher-name>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17031/1812</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kynoch</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fryer</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Neat</surname> <given-names>F. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>A simple technical measure to reduce bycatch and discard of skates and sharks in mixed-species bottom-trawl fisheries</article-title>. <source>ICES J. Mar. Sci.</source> <volume>72</volume>
<issue>6</issue>, <fpage>1861</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1868</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/icesjms/fsv037</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Link</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bogstad</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sparholt</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lilly</surname> <given-names>G. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Trophic role of Atlantic cod in the ecosystem</article-title>. <source>Fish Fish.</source> <volume>10</volume>
<issue>1</issue>, <fpage>58</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>87</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008.00295.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Link</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huse</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gaichas</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marshak</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Changing how we approach fisheries: A first attempt at an operational framework for ecosystem approaches to fisheries management</article-title>. <source>Fish Fish.</source> <volume>21</volume>
<issue>2</issue>, <fpage>393</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>434</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/faf.12438</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>M&#xe9;rillet</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kopp</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Robert</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mouchet</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pavoine</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Environment outweighs the effects of fishing in regulating demersal community structure in an exploited marine ecosystem</article-title>. <source>Glob. Change Biol.</source> <volume>26</volume>
<issue>4</issue>, <fpage>2106</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2119</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.14969</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>M&#xf6;llmann</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Diekmann</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M&#xfc;ller-Karulis</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kornilovs</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Plikshs</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Axe</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Reorganization of a large marine ecosystem due to atmospheric and anthropogenic pressure: a discontinuous regime shift in the central Baltic Sea</article-title>. <source>Glob. Change Biol.</source> <volume>15</volume>
<issue>6</issue>, <fpage>1377</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1393</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01814.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>M&#xf6;llmann</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lindegren</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blenckner</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bergstr&#xf6;m</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Casini</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Diekmann</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Implementing ecosystem-based fisheries management: from single-species to integrated ecosystem assessment and advice for Baltic Sea fish stocks</article-title>. <source>ICES J. Mar. Sci.</source> <volume>71</volume>
<issue>5</issue>, <fpage>1187</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1197</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/icesjms/fst123</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Montero</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lima</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Estay</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rezende</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Spatial and temporal shift in the factors affecting the population dynamics of calanus copepods in the north Sea</article-title>. <source>Glob. Change Biol.</source> <volume>27</volume>
<issue>3</issue>, <fpage>576</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>586</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.15394</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Moore</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davie</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Robert</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pawlowski</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dolder</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lordan</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Defining m&#xe9;tier for the celtic Sea mixed fisheries: A multiannual international study of typology</article-title>. <source>Fish. Res.</source> <volume>219</volume>, <elocation-id>105310</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fishres.2019.105310</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Moriarty</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Greenstreet</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Celtic Sea/Bay of Biscay French quarter 4 otter trawl groundfish survey monitoring and assessment data products</article-title>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7489/1958-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Moriarty</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Greenstreet</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rasmussen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Derivation of groundfish survey monitoring and assessment data product for the northeast Atlantic area</article-title>. <source>Scottish Mar. Freshw. Sci.</source> <volume>8</volume>
<issue>16</issue>, <fpage>240</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7489/1984-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Morote</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Olivar</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bozzano</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Villate</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Uriarte</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Feeding selectivity in larvae of the European hake (Merluccius merluccius) in relation to ontogeny and visual capabilities</article-title>. <source>Mar. Biol.</source> <volume>158</volume>
<issue>6</issue>, <fpage>1349</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1361</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00227-011-1654-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Moullec</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gascuel</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bentorcha</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gu&#xe9;nette</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Robert</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Trophic models: What do we learn about celtic Sea and bay of Biscay ecosystems</article-title>? <source>J. Mar. Sys.</source> <volume>172</volume>, <fpage>104</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>117</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmarsys.2017.03.008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Oksanen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Simpson</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blanchet</surname> <given-names>F. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kindt</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Legendre</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Minchin</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <source>Vegan: Community ecology package</source> (<publisher-name>R package version 2</publisher-name>), <fpage>6</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2</lpage>. Available at: <uri xlink:href="https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html">https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pedreschi</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bouch</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moriarty</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nixon</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Knights</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reid</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Integrated ecosystem analysis in Irish waters; providing the context for ecosystem-based fisheries management</article-title>. <source>Fish. Res.</source> <volume>209</volume>, <fpage>218</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>229</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fishres.2018.09.023</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pinnegar</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trenkel</surname> <given-names>V. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tidd</surname> <given-names>A. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dawson</surname> <given-names>W. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Du buit</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Does diet in celtic Sea fishes reflect prey availability</article-title>? <source>J. Fish Biol.</source> <volume>63</volume>, <fpage>197</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>212</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1095-8649.2003.00204.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Planque</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arneberg</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Principal component analyses for integrated ecosystem assessments may primarily reflect methodological artefacts</article-title>. <source>ICES J. Mar. Sci.</source> <volume>75</volume>
<issue>3</issue>, <fpage>1021</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1028</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/icesjms/fsx223</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Planque</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fromentin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Calanus and environment in the eastern north atlantic. i. spatial and temporal patterns of c. finmarchicus and c. helgolandicus</article-title>. <source>Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.</source> <volume>134</volume>, <fpage>101</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>109</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3354/meps134101</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Reid</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Calderwood</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Afonso</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bourdaud</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fauconnet</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gonz&#xe1;lez-Irusta</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>The best way to reduce discards is by not catching them</article-title>!&#x201d; in <source>The European landing obligation</source>. Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Uhlmann</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ulrich</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kennelly.</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>Cham</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>), <fpage>257</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>278</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-030-03308-8_13</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rowlands</surname> <given-names>W. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dickey-Collas</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Geffen</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nash</surname> <given-names>R. D. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Diet overlap and prey selection through metamorphosis in Irish Sea cod (Gadus morhua), haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus), and whiting (Merlangius merlangus)</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.</source> <volume>65</volume>
<issue>7</issue>, <fpage>1297</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1306</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/F08-041</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ryland</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1964</year>). <article-title>The feeding of plaice and sand-eel larvae in the southern north Sea</article-title>. <source>J. Mar. Biolog. Assoc. U.K.</source> <volume>44</volume>
<issue>2</issue>, <fpage>343</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>364</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0025315400024875</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sala</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Influence of tow duration on catch performance of trawl survey in the Mediterranean Sea</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>13</volume>, <elocation-id>e0191662</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0191662</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Simpson</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <source>Restricted permutations; using the permute package</source> (<publisher-loc>University of Regina, Regina, Canada</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Environmental Change Research Centre-UCL</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Simpson</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jennings</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blanchard</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sch&#xf6;n</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sims</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Continental shelf-wide response of a fish assemblage to rapid warming of the Sea</article-title>. <source>Curr. Biol.</source> <volume>21</volume>
<issue>18</issue>, <fpage>1565</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1570</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.016</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sissenwine</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1984</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Why do fish populations vary</article-title>?&#x201d; in <source>Exploitation of marine communities</source> (<publisher-loc>Heidelberg</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>), <fpage>59</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>94</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-642-70157-3_3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Szuwalski</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vert-Pre</surname> <given-names>K. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Punt</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Branch</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hilborn</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Examining common assumptions about recruitment: A meta-analysis of recruitment dynamics for worldwide marine fisheries</article-title>. <source>Fish Fish.</source> <volume>16</volume>
<issue>4</issue>, <fpage>633</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>648</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/faf.12083</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Temming</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gotz</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mergardt</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ehrich</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Predation of whiting and haddock on sandeel: aggregative response, competition and diel periodicity</article-title>. <source>J.Fish Biol.</source> <volume>64</volume>
<issue>5</issue>, <fpage>1351</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1372</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00400.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B73">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>ter Braak</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Canonical community ordination. part I: Basic theory and linear methods</article-title>. <source>Ecoscience</source> <volume>1</volume>
<issue>2</issue>, <fpage>127</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>140</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/11956860.1994.11682237</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B74">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>ter Hofstede</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hiddink</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rijnsdorp</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Regional warming changes fish species richness in the eastern north Atlantic ocean</article-title>. <source>Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.</source> <volume>414</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3354/meps08753</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B75">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Trenkel</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pinnegar</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dawson</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>du Buit</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tidd</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Spatial and temporal structure of predator-prey relationships in the celtic Sea fish community</article-title>. <source>Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.</source> <volume>299</volume>, <fpage>257</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>268</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3354/meps299257</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B76">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ulrich</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vermard</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dolder</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brunel</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jardim</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Holmes</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Achieving maximum sustainable yield in mixed fisheries: a management approach for the north Sea demersal fisheries</article-title>. <source>ICES J. Mar. Sci.</source> <volume>74</volume>
<issue>2</issue>, <fpage>566</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>575</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/icesjms/fsw126</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B77">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>van Deurs</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van Hal</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tomczak</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>J&#xf3;nasd&#xf3;ttir</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dolmer</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Recruitment of lesser sandeel ammodytes marinus in relation to density dependence and zooplankton composition</article-title>. <source>Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.</source> <volume>381</volume>, <fpage>249</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>258</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3354/meps07960</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B78">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vanhatalo</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kulahci</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Impact of autocorrelation on principal components and their use in statistical process control</article-title>. <source>Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int.</source> <volume>32</volume>
<issue>4</issue>, <fpage>1483</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1500</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/qre.1858</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B79">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zimmermann</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Claireaux</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Enberg</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Common trends in recruitment dynamics of north-east Atlantic fish stocks and their links to environment, ecology and management</article-title>. <source>Fish Fish.</source> <volume>20</volume>
<issue>3</issue>, <fpage>518</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>536</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/faf.12360</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B80">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zuur</surname> <given-names>A. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fryer</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jolliffe</surname> <given-names>I. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dekker</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beukema</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>a). <article-title>Estimating common trends in multivariate time series using dynamic factor analysis</article-title>. <source>Environmetrics</source> <volume>14</volume>
<issue>7</issue>, <fpage>665</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>685</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/env.611</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B81">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zuur</surname> <given-names>A. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tuck</surname> <given-names>I. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bailey</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>b). <article-title>Dynamic factor analysis to estimate common trends in fisheries time series</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.</source> <volume>60</volume>
<issue>5</issue>, <fpage>542</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>552</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/f03-030</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>