<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Mar. Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Marine Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Mar. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-7745</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmars.2023.1075683</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Marine Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Investigating how river flow regimes impact on river delta salinization through idealized modeling</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Matsoukis</surname>
<given-names>Constantinos</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2062209"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Amoudry</surname>
<given-names>Laurent O.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1483414"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bricheno</surname>
<given-names>Lucy</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/987748"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Leonardi</surname>
<given-names>Nicoletta</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1192384"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group> 
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Department of Geography and Planning, School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool</institution>, <addr-line>Liverpool</addr-line>, <country>United Kingdom</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>National Oceanography Centre</institution>, <addr-line>Liverpool</addr-line>, <country>United Kingdom</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling</institution>, <addr-line>Stirling</addr-line>, <country>United Kingdom</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Yi Pan, Hohai University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Beatrice M.S. Giambastiani, University of Bologna, Italy; Jos&#xe9; Pinho, University of Minho, Portugal</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Constantinos Matsoukis, <email xlink:href="mailto:cm262@stir.ac.uk">cm262@stir.ac.uk</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002">
<p>This article was submitted to Coastal Ocean Processes, a section of the journal Frontiers in Marine Science</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>02</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>10</volume>
<elocation-id>1075683</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>20</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>10</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Matsoukis, Amoudry, Bricheno and Leonardi</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Matsoukis, Amoudry, Bricheno and Leonardi</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Excessive salinity can harm ecosystems and compromise the various anthropogenic activities that take place in river deltas. The issue of salinization is expected to exacerbate due to natural and/or anthropogenic climate change. Water regulations are required to secure a sufficient water supply in conditions of limited water volume availability. Research is ongoing in seek of the optimum flow distribution establishing longer lasting and fresher conditions in deltas.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>In this study a three&#x2013;dimensional (3D) numerical model built for an idealized delta configuration was utilized to investigate how different river discharge annual distributions affect saltwater in deltas. Five simulations were carried out by implementing annual distributions of equal water volume but different shape.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>The results showed that peak flow magnitude, time of occurrence and the length of a hydrograph&#x2019;s tails can be important parameters affecting stratification, freshwater residence, and renewal times. Hydrographs of small flow range and light tails were the most successful in keeping the delta and its trunk channel fresher for longer periods. Salinity distributions showed a slower response to decreasing rather than increasing river discharges. An increase in the flow rate can result in salinity standards demanded for certain activities (e.g., farming, irrigation etc.) in much shorter times. On the other hand, hydrographs with heavy tails can push the salt intrusion limit further away and be more efficient in mixing the water column. However, they present low freshwater residence and high-water renewal times.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>These results provide strong indications that it is possible to improve the freshwater conditions in deltas without seeking for additional water resources but by modifying the water distribution. The main outcomes of this work may be able to support and assist coastal scientists and stakeholders dealing with the management of freshwater resources in river deltas across the world.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>river deltas</kwd>
<kwd>salt intrusion</kwd>
<kwd>idealized modeling</kwd>
<kwd>flow regimes</kwd>
<kwd>water management</kwd>
</kwd-group>    <contract-sponsor id="cn001">Natural Environment Research Council<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100000270</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="7"/>
<table-count count="4"/>
<equation-count count="3"/>
<ref-count count="156"/>
<page-count count="19"/>
<word-count count="12661"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Rising sea level and decreasing streamflow threaten water resourcing and freshwater availability by causing an upstream intrusion of the saltwater zone (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Gornitz, 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Bhuiyan and Dutta, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Hong and Shen, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Hong et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Bricheno et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Saltwater intrusion (SI) is much exacerbated in low lying areas such as deltas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B155">Zhou et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). SI is a serious problem that affects households, agriculture, irrigation and industry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Allison, 1964</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B128">Smedema and Shiati, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B153">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>) because rivers and aquifers contaminated by high salinity decrease freshwater storage and water quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Gornitz, 1991</xref>). In addition, SI reduces soil fertility resulting in low crops yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Bhuiyan and Dutta, 2012</xref>), threatens vegetation and freshwater species with limited salinity tolerance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B138">Visser et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B145">White et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>), increases plants mortality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Kaplan et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Bhuiyan and Dutta, 2012</xref>) and affects human health (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B117">Sarwar, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B113">Rahman et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>Many deltas face already the consequences of saltwater intrusion including the Mekong in Vietnam (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B105">Nguyen and Savenije, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B133">Trieu and Phong, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Eslami et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>) the Ganges-Brahmaputra in Bangladesh (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B106">Nobi and Das Gupta, 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Bhuiyan and Dutta, 2012</xref>; Rahman, 2015; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B147">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Bricheno et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B126">Sherin, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Bricheno et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>), the Mississippi in the Gulf of Mexico (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Holm and Sasser, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Day et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Das et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>), the Yangtze in China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Hu and Ding, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Dai et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B111">Qiu and Zhu, 2015</xref>), the Pearl River (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Hong et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>) and the Nile Delta (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Frihy, 2003</xref>). Unfortunately, limitations in water supply come along with an increase in water demand because of population growth, economic development, and land use changes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B107">Phan et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>Sustainable water management and enhanced water conservation practices are necessary for the available water supply to meet with the future demand (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Dawadi and Ahmad, 2013</xref>). These practices often rely on the assumption that salt intrusion reduces as river discharge increases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Garvine et&#xa0;al., 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Gong and Shen, 2011</xref>). In the absence of tides or other driving mechanisms (i.e., atmospheric or oceanic forcing) the river discharge dominates the salinity distribution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B136">Valle-Levinson and Wilson, 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B146">Wong, 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B101">Monismith et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>). During the 20th century, water management relied on technical and engineering solutions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Ha et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). The so called &#x2018;hard-path&#x2019; approach consisted of dams, aqueducts, pipelines and complex treatment plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Gleick, 2003</xref>). However, this type of solutions often comes with a cost. For example, tens of millions of people have been displaced by their homes due to water related projects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Adams, 2000</xref>) while the freshwater flows reaching many deltas are not adequate anymore and this has several consequences for the local environment and population (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Gleick, 2003</xref>). Recently, the need for more adaptive management to sustain freshwater resources has been identified (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Ha et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B151">Zevenbergen et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). A &#x2018;soft-path&#x2019; approach for water is now promoted that would include regulatory policies for better use of existing water resources than seeking for additional ones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Gleick, 2002</xref>). In this context, an efficient water usage is preferred with equitable distribution and sustainable system operation over time while local communities should be also included in water management decisions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Gleick, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Gleick, 2003</xref>). Within this concept, the problem of saltwater intrusion in deltas could probably be mitigated by an efficient water management of a catchment&#x2019;s freshwater availability instead of resorting to technical solutions. This could be achieved for example by storing a certain amount of water that is available during a wet season and supply it during the next dry season when the demand for freshwater is higher. Coastal reservoirs -water storage structures constructed at a river estuary or other coastal area to store fresh water and control water resources- have already been constructed in China, South Korea, Hong Kong and Singapore (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B149">Yuan and Wu, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B132">Tabarestani and Fouladfar, 2021</xref>). These structures are constructed near the coast, in natural river basins and have a smaller environmental footprint compared to other technical solutions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B127">Sitharam et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). An additional advantage is that they could be used for the generation of tidal renewable energy assisting further into the development of sustainable and environmentally friendly infrastructure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B127">Sitharam et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Independent of a hard or soft path, the main management strategy is to affect river discharge, which is likely to cause changes to the annual hydrograph. Such changes are also expected to occur as a consequence of natural climate variability and anthropogenic climate change (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Deser et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B152">Zhang and Delworth, 2018</xref>). Possible effects to deltas&#x2019; salinity distribution from these changes need to be assessed. Even though salinity response to changes in river discharges has been studied extensively in estuaries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Garvine et&#xa0;al., 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B146">Wong, 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B135">Uncles and Stephens, 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">MacCready, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B101">Monismith et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Bowen, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Banas et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Chen, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Hetland and Geyer, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Brockway et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Lerczak et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Gong and Shen, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B141">Wei et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>) it is still unclear if and how this changes in the presence of a channelized network.</p>
<p>The present study investigates the effect of various annual flow distributions of equal water volume on the salt intrusion. The paper tries to answer questions such as: 1) how salinity responds to flow changes, 2) what is the impact on salinity from changes in hydrographs' shape 3) which flow distribution cause the maximum increase of mixing in the delta and 4) which flow regime ensures fresher water conditions for the longest period and to what extent.</p>
<p>The answer to the last question derives from measuring flushing and residence times that are useful tools to assess the efficacy and adequacy of a certain flow distribution for averting the salt intrusion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Choi and Lee, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B116">S&#xe1;mano et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). Flushing time (FT) is defined as the time required for the cumulative freshwater inflow to equal the amount of freshwater originally present in the region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Dyer, 1973</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B125">Sheldon and Alber, 2002</xref>). The simplest and most common method for the FT calculation is the freshwater fraction in which the freshwater volume is divided by the freshwater input (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Dyer, 1973</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Fischer et&#xa0;al., 1979</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B144">Williams, 1986</xref>). A difficulty on the determination of the freshwater volume and input arises in the case of unsteady flow and tidal conditions. Many researchers implemented the method by taking averages over a certain period (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B108">Pilson, 1985</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Christian et&#xa0;al., 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Balls, 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">Lebo et&#xa0;al., 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Eyre and Twigg, 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Alber and Sheldon, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Hagy, et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Huang and Spaulding, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B125">Sheldon and Alber, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Huang, 2007</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Alber and Sheldon (1999)</xref> proposed a specific technique to determine the appropriate averaging period of the river discharge by assuming that this should be equal or very close to the flushing time itself. They tested their method in Georgia Estuaries. Whereas the FT is a unique value representative of an entire water body, the residence time (RT) is a measure of spatial variation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Choi and Lee, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B116">S&#xe1;mano et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). It is defined as the remaining time that a particle will spend in a defined region after first arriving at some starting location (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B156">Zimmerman, 1976</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B125">Sheldon and Alber, 2002</xref>). Therefore, the RT is applied within a restricted geographical area such as an estuary, a water basin or a box model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Hagy et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B125">Sheldon and Alber, 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B116">S&#xe1;mano et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>).</p>
<p>In this study, the concept of RT is adapted to measure the time that the water remains fresh within the delta. This requires a definition of what exactly fresh water is which is usually case dependent. There are salinity standards for execution of certain activities and survival of vegetation species and aquatic life. For instance, salinity in the water has to be at least less than 1 PSU for it to be potable (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ahmed and Rahman (2000)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B117">Sarwar (2005)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Dasgupta et&#xa0;al. (2015)</xref>) and crop yields can be severely affected if salinity is more than 4 PSU (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Clarke et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Some aquatic organisms (e.g. phytoplankton, larvae fish, shrimps, smelt etc.) and vegetation (e.g. Sagittaria Latifolia, Sagittaria Lancifolia, phragmites australis) species do not survive in environments with more than 2 PSU salinity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Jassby et&#xa0;al., 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B138">Visser et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Hutton et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B145">White et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B140">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). In particular, the location of the 2-PSU bottom isohaline has been found to have significant statistical relationships with many estuarine resources (e.g., phytoplankton, larvae fish, shrimps, smelt etc.) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Jassby et&#xa0;al., 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Hutton et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). It is also a threshold for freshwater wetlands conversion to brackish marsh (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Conner et&#xa0;al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B140">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Therefore, the location of 2 PSU isohaline has been established as a salt intrusion measure in many similar studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B121">Schubel, 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B100">Monismith et&#xa0;al., 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B101">Monismith et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Herbold and Vendlinkski, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Andrews et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). In this context, a freshwater RT in this study is determined to be the time that the salinity remains below 2 PSU.</p>
<p>For the purposes of this study, a 3D numerical model for an idealized delta configuration is built in Delft3D. Idealization is chosen with the consideration that idealized (or exploratory) models can offer simpler and better explanations of certain behaviors in systems involving many interacting processes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B103">Murray, 2002</xref>). In this approach, some parameters are intentionally omitted (e.g., tides and/or waves) and only the core causal factors (e.g., river discharge) are retained (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B143">Weisberg, 2007</xref>). Idealized studies have the advantage of reducing the complexity that is found in real systems and provide a better physical insight on the effect of a certain variable in a physical phenomenon isolated from others. Therefore, the use of idealized models aims to reveal the direct impact of external forcing factors in a system&#x2019;s variable separately for each one of them. In this paper, five simulations with different flow distributions are carried out. The implemented hydrographs follow typical distributions similar to some that can be often found in real deltas. The paper aspires to provide answers through the idealized modeling for a more sustainable use of freshwater resources in deltaic systems.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Model setup</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B95">Matsoukis et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref> built a 3D model with an idealized delta configuration to investigate the impact of tidal level changes in a static delta&#x2019;s salinity neglecting morphological changes. The same model is used in this paper. The model &#x2013;that was built in Delft3D (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Deltares, 2014</xref>)- uses a structured rectangular grid with dimensions of 20&#xa0;km to 22&#xa0;km. The grid resolution varies from 50&#xa0;m to 200&#xa0;m in the X direction and between 20&#xa0;m and 100&#xa0;m in the Y direction of a Cartesian co-ordinate system. The delta was built by implementing a high and constant river discharge of 3000 m<sup>3</sup>/s in an initially uniform bathymetry. The flow enters in the domain through an inlet of 1.3&#xa0;km length and 380&#xa0;m width. Erosion and sedimentation caused by the river discharge resulted in the delta bathymetry that can be seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1F</bold>
</xref>. The delta covers an area of 4.8&#xa0;km x 8&#xa0;km. A bed slope of 0.5<sup>0</sup> has been imposed 10&#xa0;km downstream of the river boundary so that the water depth reaches 30&#xa0;m at the offshore boundary. The full model&#x2019;s bathymetry can be seen in the <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>. To note that results analysis shown in this paper includes only the delta area as it is presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1F</bold>
</xref> and excludes the deeper offshore area outside of it as the focus is restricted only within the delta limits. The model&#x2019;s bathymetry remains constant during the simulations and there is no sediment input. Bed level changes are not considered so that the impact of flow distributions on the salinity is isolated from any morphological effects. The vertical resolution consists of eight sigma layers. Higher numbers of vertical layers were considered too. However, it was found that the increase of vertical layers had only a quantitative and not qualitative impact on the results. The main conclusions for each paper's section remained unaffected, probably due to the relatively shallow water depths. Considering that this is an idealized study where the actual magnitude values are not so important, it was decided then to keep the vertical resolution equal to 8 layers to satisfy computational efficiency limitations for a full year study. The default Delft3D values for horizontal diffusion and viscosity are introduced in the model equal to 10 m<sup>2</sup>/s and 1 m<sup>2</sup>/s respectively that were found to be the optimum for model&#x2019;s performance and stability. A relatively large diffusion coefficient is justified for large scale applications where estuarine physics apply. In addition, diffusion can vary a lot when seasonal flows for a one-year simulation period are implemented as they may cause substantial salinity changes in the vertical (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B100">Monismith et&#xa0;al., 1996</xref>). The vertical diffusion is fully modelled by the &#x3ba;-&#x3f5; turbulence closure model. A spatially constant Chezy coefficient (45 m<sup>1/2</sup>/s<sup>-1</sup>) is implemented to account for bed roughness in accordance with what has been used in other idealized delta studies with Delft3D (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Edmonds and Sligerland, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">Leonardi et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Caldwell and Edmonds, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Burpee et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). A cyclic implicit numerical scheme is used, and the time step is 30 seconds being the optimum value for both model stability and computational time. Further details on the model&#x2019;s parameters and the process of bathymetry development can be found in the <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material (S1)</bold>
</xref>.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>The hydrographs implemented in the model: <bold>(A)</bold> Platykurtic <bold>(B)</bold> Mesokurtic <bold>(C)</bold> Leptokurtic <bold>(D)</bold> Left Skewed and <bold>(E)</bold> Right Skewed flow distribution for one year. <bold>(F)</bold> The delta bathymetry. The red line AB measures the 6km distance from the river mouth (point A) corresponding to the length of the salt intrusion curve displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2B</bold>
</xref>. The colored semicircles with their centre at point A and radius 3km (red), 4.2km (green) and 5km (yellow) visualize the cross sections over which salinity is averaged for the results analysis in sections 3.1, 3.2 and 3.4.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-10-1075683-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(A)</bold> Time series of the bottom salinity at the river mouth (point A in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1F</bold>
</xref>). Each colour represents results for a simulation with a different hydrograph. The dashed black line draws the 2 PSU threshold. The short brown, magenta and black vertical lines indicate the time moment of the peak flow on the horizontal axis for the left skewed, right skewed and symmetric distributions equal to 91, 274 and 183 days respectively. <bold>(B)</bold> Annual averages of the mean over depth salinity when averaged radially every 300&#xa0;m along a distance of 6 km from the river mouth.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-10-1075683-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Hydrodynamic forcing</title>
<p>The model is forced with an annual river flow distribution. Five simulations are setup with hydrographs of equal water volume but different shape each time. This is achieved by implementing the Beta (B) function to an original hydrograph and obtain five beta distributions. The Po delta flow distribution for 2009 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B102">Montanari, 2012</xref>) is used as the original hydrograph to build the five idealized ones. The use of the 2009 Po delta hydrograph does not imply any resemblance with the idealized delta and is chosen merely as a guide. To build a beta distribution the following equation is used (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B150">Yue et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula>
<label>(1)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#x3b1;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#x3b2;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>&#x222b;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:munderover>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b2;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mstyle>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>x&lt;1;&#xa0;&#xa0;</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>&#x3b1;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;&#x3b2;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>Where B is the probability density function, x is the probability of occurrence of each daily flow taken equal to 1/365 for an annual distribution. The shape parameters &#x3b1; and &#x3b2; determine the shape of the hydrograph. The normalized probability distribution is then converted to a flow distribution by multiplying by the annual water volume of the original hydrograph (Po Delta in 2009). Consequently, the five idealized hydrographs contain the same water volume with the original one. However, the size of the idealized delta is much smaller than the Po delta and the implementation of the original flow range causes stability issues in the model. Therefore, the hydrographs are reduced by the river cross-sections&#x2019; ratio between the real (Po Delta) and the idealized delta. The produced hydrographs can be seen in panels a-e of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>. <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref> presents the basic statistic parameters for each beta distribution. Equal shape parameters result into symmetric hydrographs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1A-C</bold>
</xref>) and the higher their value the higher the peak is. When &#x3b1; is smaller than &#x3b2; a left skewed hydrograph occurs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1D</bold>
</xref>). The hydrograph exhibits right skewness when &#x3b2; is smaller than &#x3b1; (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1E</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Statistical parameters for each hydrograph type.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Scenario</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Shape parameters</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Kurtosis</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Qmax<break/>(m<sup>3</sup>/s)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Qmean<break/>(m<sup>3</sup>/s)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Platykurtic</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x3b1; =&#x3b2; = 2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">140</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mesokurtic</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x3b1; =&#x3b2; = 4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.45</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">204</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Leptokurtic</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x3b1; = &#x3b2; =8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">293</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left Skewed</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x3b1; = 2 &#x3b2;= 4</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">197</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right Skewed</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x3b1; = 4 &#x3b2;= 2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">197</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The five hydrographs in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref> can be qualitatively classified based on their shape and the tails of each distribution as: 1) Platykurtic (light tails and low peak), 2) Mesokurtic (relatively light tails and medium peak), 3) Leptokurtic (heavy tails and high peak), 4) Left skewed (long tail on the right) and 5) Right skewed (long tail on the left). All of them correspond to seasonal regimes with a pronounced wet season (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Hansford et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). The distinction between heavy and light tails in this paper is defined as follows: heavy tails indicate distributions with larger probability of getting an outlier (e.g., leptokurtic) and light tails indicate distributions that go to zero faster than the exponential distribution (e.g., platykurtic) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Bryson, 1974</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Glen, 2016</xref>).</p>
<p>Small scale discharge events have been purposefully neglected in the five hydrographs that all have smooth shapes. The use of irregular shapes would add into complexity &#x2013; in contrast to the benefits of a simplified and idealized approach- and would hinder the extraction of concrete conclusions on the effects of hydrographs shape. However, an indication of potential transient peaks effects and larger flow amplitudes can be given if comparing results between the three symmetric distributions.</p>
<p>Annual flow distributions with shapes close to the hydrographs of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref> are recorded often in many real deltas. For example, left skewed hydrographs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1D</bold>
</xref>) were reported in deltas located at the Gulf of Mexico including the Wax Lake Delta in the years between 2006 and 2010 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B123">Shaw et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>) and the Mississippi Delta between 1993 and 2012 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Kolker et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Based on large data records from internet data bases and national agencies, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Latrubesse et&#xa0;al. (2005)</xref> showed that the Mekong and the Ganges-Brahmaputra river catchments develop usually right skewed annual hydrographs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1E</bold>
</xref>). The Yangtze delta sees its peak flow often in the middle of the year at some time during the wet season that occurs between May and September (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Birkinshaw et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Such flow distributions are similar to that of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1C</bold>
</xref> and have been reported in the years between 1996 and 2005 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Lai et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Birkinshaw et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>) in the Yangtze Delta. In addition, when <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Hansford et&#xa0;al. (2020)</xref> averaged daily flow data for one year between 1978-2009 in the Parana Delta (Argentina), they detected an annual flow hydrograph very similar to a platykurtic distribution (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>). Finally, mesokurtic hydrographs as the one in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1B</bold>
</xref> have been observed in the Colorado and Nile deltas. Averaged annual hydrographs for the 1950-1993 period in the Colorado (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B109">Pitlick and Cress, 2000</xref>) and flow distributions at several stations in the Nile (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Eldardiry and Hossain, 2019</xref>) confirm this. The averaged over the years 1984-1996 annual hydrograph in the Niger Delta also exhibited a mesokurtic hydrograph shape (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Lienou et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Boundary conditions</title>
<p>A zero-water level is implemented at the offshore boundary while the Riemann condition (in the form of a zero-velocity variant) applies in the lateral boundaries. Fresh water is assumed at the upstream river boundary and seawater salinity (30PSU) at the offshore and lateral boundaries. Special care was taken at the lateral (north and south) boundaries so that the freshwater plume is not clamped by the imposed seawater salinity but is allowed to spread radially with no boundary effects. This is possible to do in Delft3D by setting the horizontal diffusion equal to zero only at the two last grid lines along these two boundaries. In this way, the model is allowed to calculate its own salinities close to the boundaries unaffected of the imposed 30 PSU.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Initial conditions</title>
<p>A spin-up simulation precedes each time to get a dynamic equilibrium for salinity to be introduced as initial conditions. A uniform salinity equal to 30 PSU is implemented in the model except for the river upstream boundary where zero salinity is imposed. It is decided to spin-up the model with the initial flow of each hydrograph in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>. These are very small but non-zero values and this reduces the time required to reach a dynamic equilibrium. This means that the simulations start in dry season (low flows) conditions. The river flow in the spin-up model is constant and the simulation is stopped after 30 days when steady state conditions are reached in all cases. The full model setup is summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Summary of the main model setup parameters.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Vertical resolution</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8 layers</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Time step</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">30 seconds</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Horizontal diffusion</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">10 m<sup>2</sup>/s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Horizontal viscosity</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1 m<sup>2</sup>/s</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Vertical diffusion</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x3ba;-&#x3f5; turbulence scheme</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Roughness</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Chezy coefficient (45 m<sup>1/2</sup>/s<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lateral flow boundaries</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Riemann invariant (0&#xa0;m/s)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Offshore flow boundary</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Water Level (0&#xa0;m)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">River flow boundary</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Time series of daily river discharges for one year</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lateral boundaries salinity</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">30 PSU</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Offshore boundary salinity boundaries</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">30 PSU</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">River boundary salinity</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0 PSU</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Initial flow conditions</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Water Level (0&#xa0;m)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Initial salinity conditions</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Spatial variation input file after a spin-up simulation starting with uniform 30 PSU salinity</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Assumptions and limitations</title>
<p>The goal of the study is to assess the effects of flow regimes on the salinity distribution isolated from any other effects (i.e., tides and waves). Therefore, the delta&#x2019;s idealized bathymetry has been developed after a morphological simulation where no tidal forcing is considered and subsequently no tides are included in the five simulations of different annual flow distributions. This decision is taken on the grounds that a different morphology would be required if tides were included as it is known that tides have a strong influence together with river discharges on deltas&#x2019; morphology depending on their range (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Galloway, 1975</xref>). Even though this may compromise the applicability of the results, the present bathymetry retains many typical and common delta features such as the erosion in front of the river mouth and the downstream shallowing and widening of the channels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Hori and Saito, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Lamb et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). In addition, the idealized delta exhibits bathymetric irregularities with deeper channels on the left of the delta apex (looking seaward) and shallower right of it. Due to the presence of such common and special features of deltas morphology, the model can capture bathymetric effects on the salinity horizontal and vertical distribution that would have not been uncovered if a more simplified bathymetry had been implemented. This is crucial because the role of bathymetry on salinity distribution is important as it has been identified in previous studies as well (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B130">Sridevi et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B142">Wei et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B95">Matsoukis et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). In addition, the world&#x2019;s deltas are reported to be in a continuous state of transition regarding their dynamic morphological equilibrium due to natural climate change and human activities and thus such irregularities may not be uncommon (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Hoitink et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B95">Matsoukis et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref> identified these irregularities as the cause of asymmetries in the salinity distribution between delta areas especially during low flow seasons. They then neglected Coriolis force on this basis to avoid an extra source of asymmetry in the model, something that is adopted in this work as well with the same justification. Nevertheless, this omission is not expected to have remarkable impact on the results in this specific case. Buoyant plumes may become geostrophic dominated only beyond the near-field region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Horner-Devine et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>) where momentum balance is yet mainly dominated by barotropic and baroclinic pressure gradients, frictional stresses, and flow acceleration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B97">McCabe et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>). But specifically in deltas, freshwater plumes are formed at the channels outlets and interact with each other (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B148">Yuan et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Horner-Devine et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>) to form larger scale ones. This goes beyond the focus area in this study as depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1F</bold>
</xref> where Coriolis force effects would be minimal. Likewise, wind forcing is usually considered of second order in the near-field region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Kakoulaki et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>) although there are recent indications that plume dynamics may be more sensitive to winds than previously assumed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Kakoulaki et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Kastner, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B129">Spicer et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Despite this, the wind effects on the plume&#x2019;s orientation, spreading, thickness and mixing and their subsequent impact on flushing, residence times and stratification have not been considered in this case. The reason is that the wind acts intermittently and in much smaller time scales compared to the annual flow distributions of the current setup and the direct effect of the latter would not be discernible.</p>
<p>The above simplifications would indicate that the applicability of this paper&#x2019;s findings might be limited to river dominated deltas or at least deltas with little tidal influence and in medium latitudes. These may include for example deltas in the Gulf of Mexico (Mississippi, Atchafalaya and Wax Lake), Orinoco, the Danube, the Irrawaddy and the Po delta.</p>
<p>However, idealized modeling does not aim to provide specific answers and solutions directly interpretable to real systems. Real case models should be used for such purposes. The level of complexity in real systems is such that non-linear effects cannot always be captured by idealized models where several simplifications are considered. Nonetheless, the advantage of idealized models is that they are more oriented towards a &#x2018;knowledge obtaining&#x2019; and fundamental physical analysis that results in more general and universal conclusions. In that sense, the present work&#x2019;s conclusions can refer to a larger number of deltas than those mentioned in this section and with various hydrodynamic conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Flushing time calculation</title>
<p>Flushing time (FT) is measured in section 3.6 for each flow regime. The river delta as depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1F</bold>
</xref> is considered for the calculation which is executed based on the &#x2018;freshwater fraction method&#x2019; given by the following equation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Dyer, 1973</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Alber and Sheldon, 1999</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula>
<label>(2)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mstyle>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>Q</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>For a total number n of grid cells i, <italic>V<sub>i</sub>
</italic> and <italic>S<sub>i</sub>
</italic> are its volume and salinity respectively. <italic>S<sub>SW</sub>
</italic> is the sea water salinity (in this case equal to 30 PSU) and <italic>Q<sub>F</sub>
</italic> an averaged over a time frame river discharge. The equation assumes a steady state system which can be justified in this case because the flow changes slowly compared to salinity adjustment scales (see also section 4.1). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B124">Sheldon and Alber (2006)</xref> indicated that equation 2 is more appropriate for systems with high freshwater flow and large salinity differences between an estuary and the ocean which is also true in the present case (especially at high flow seasons). The determination of the appropriate period of averaging for the calculation of <italic>Q<sub>F</sub>
</italic> can be a tricky task. In this paper, the Date Specific Method (DSM) is used as introduced by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Alber and Sheldon (1999)</xref>. The method assumes that the averaging period must be equal to the FT. By selecting an observation day as a starting point, the FT is calculated through an iterative process working backwards and stops when its value equals the period over which the river discharge is averaged.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Salinity response to river discharge changes</title>
<p>Previous studies detected a hysteresis on the salinity&#x2019;s temporal response to flow changes in estuaries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Hetland and Geyer, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B119">Savenije, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Chen, 2015</xref>). The salinity responds slower to flow decreases than increases. An investigation follows on the existence or not of this hysteresis in the idealized delta for the symmetric and skewed hydrographs in separate. To do this, the salinity is first averaged over depth and over a radial cross-section of 3&#xa0;km distance from the mouth. Then, this is plotted either in time and/or against the river discharge. The decision to show results for this particular radial section (3&#xa0;km) for both symmetric and skewed distributions is taken with the consideration that it is probably safer to assess the salinity response in a location with medium influence of the river discharge where the water does not become completely fresh. This is a somewhat arbitrary decision, but it does not affect much the conclusions. The same analysis but for a section closer to the river (1&#xa0;km) (available in the <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>, section <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>S2</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figures S3, S4</bold>
</xref>) shows similar results.</p>
<sec id="s3_1_1">
<label>3.1.1</label>
<title>Symmetric hydrographs</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref> displays the mean over depth daily salinity averaged over a radial cross-section of 3&#xa0;km distance (red semicircle in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1F</bold>
</xref>) from the mouth at every date for the three symmetric distributions. The bottom axis shows the dates of the 1st semester and the corresponding salinity for each day denoted by dotted lines. During the 1st semester the salinity decreases monotonously. The top axis shows the dates of the 2nd semester in reverse order starting from right to the left and the corresponding salinity for each day is denoted by circled lines. During the 2nd semester the salinity increases monotonously. The unique daily values of the river discharge from each one of the three symmetric hydrographs are also added in the plot displayed as continuous lines and with its scale being on the right axis. Due to the symmetry, the dates on the top are projections of the dates on the bottom axis of equal river discharges. Therefore, the points of intersection of a vertical line drawn in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref> with the dotted and circled lines give us the salinity level at days of equal flow.</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(A)</bold> A comparison of the mean over depth salinity averaged over a distance of 3 km from the river mouth between the three symmetric distributions. Bottom axis shows the dates of the 1st semester. The dotted lines denote salinity in the 1st semester. Top axis shows the dates of the 2nd semester moving from right to the left. Circled lines denote salinity in the 2nd semester increasing from right to the left. The river discharge of each symmetric distribution is added with continuous lines and with its scale on the right axis. The flow increases from 1st of January until 1st of July following the bottom axis and decreases from 2nd of July until 31 of December following the top axis. <bold>(B)</bold> A timeline of the salinity differences above 0.5 PSU between the 1st and 2nd semester for each symmetric distribution.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-10-1075683-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref> shows that initially, the order between the three symmetric distributions is as follows:</p>
<p>S<sub>leptokurtic</sub> &gt;S<sub>mesokurtic</sub> &gt; S<sub>platykurtic</sub> because the relationship between the river discharge (Q) magnitude of the three symmetric distributions follows the opposite order Q<sub>platykurtic</sub> &gt; Q<sub>mesokurtic</sub> &gt; Q<sub>leptokurtic</sub>. The order between the river discharges changes as the flow increases in the 1st semester and so does that of the salinity. S<sub>leptokurtic</sub> falls below S<sub>platykurtic</sub> at first and S<sub>mesokurtic</sub> a few days later. The dates of the intersection between the salinity curves correspond to the dates of intersection between the flow curves in each case which means that the salinity becomes lower in one simulation when its flow becomes higher than the flow of another simulation.</p>
<p>The opposite procedure takes place at the 2nd semester and as long as the flow decreases. The salinity of the leptokurtic hydrograph becomes higher than the mesokurtic and then than the platykurtic salinity.</p>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref> indicates that there is a hysteresis on the salinity&#x2019;s response between increasing and decreasing flows. For example, the leptokurtic salinity falls below the platykurtic one in the 1st semester on the 5th of May. This means that the change occurs only 55 days before the peak flow day on the 1st of July. On the contrary, the leptokurtic salinity becomes higher than the platykurtic one in the 2nd semester on the 10th of September. This is 72 days far from the 1st of July (peak flow day) which shows a delay in comparison to the interchange in the 1st semester between the two simulations. Similar conclusions can be drawn when comparing between any couple of simulations.</p>
<p>In addition, it can be seen that there is a time frame in each simulation when the salinity in the 2nd semester is always lower compared to its corresponding date of equal flow in the 1st semester. This indicates that the salinity might not be equal at dates of equal flow depending on whether the flow is increasing or decreasing and whether the peak flow has occurred already or not. However, this effect is not present for very low flows (at the start of the simulation) or very high ones while getting closer to the peak flow day. In this case, the salinity is equal for equal flows independent of increasing or decreasing river discharge.</p>
<p>To get a clearer image of this salinity asymmetry between 1st and 2nd semester, the salinity differences of more than 0.5 PSU between the two semesters are plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold>
</xref> for each day and each simulation separately. The maximum salinity difference increases with the peak flow magnitude, but the duration of salinity differences decreases with it. For example, differences in salinity between the two semesters can reach 10 PSU in the leptokurtic case but they are present only for approximately 1.5 months. On the contrary, the maximum salinity difference in the platykurtic case is 8 PSU but differences are present for 2.5 months instead.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_1_2">
<label>3.1.2</label>
<title>Skewed hydrographs</title>
<p>The analysis for the two skewed hydrographs is presented in a different manner since the flow range remains the same in both cases. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref> displays the salinity averaged over depth and over the radial cross section 3&#xa0;km far from the mouth against the river discharge. The left skewed case shows almost equal salinity between the start and the end of the simulation. The long tail covers a period of 9 months with decreasing flows that allows the salinity to recover and return to its initial state. In contrast, the salinity for the right skewed hydrograph is about 1 PSU lower at the end of the simulation compared to its initial value. In this case, the simulation ends with the short tail that covers a period of only 3 months with a very sharp flow decrease that does not allow the salinity to recover.</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>The mean over depth salinity averaged over a distance of 3&#xa0;km far from the river mouth against the river discharge for the two skewed hydrographs. The circles correspond to the dates of the long tail and the crosses to those of the short tail.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-10-1075683-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>There are indications of a hysteresis in salinity&#x2019;s response to flow changes in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref> as well. Both simulations exhibit a time frame with lower salinity during the decreasing flow periods compared to equal discharges at increasing flow periods. The salinity is lower in the short tail for the right skewed and in the long tail for the left skewed case.</p>
<p>Similar to what is observed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref> for the symmetric hydrographs, there is a flow range with equal salinity. This occurs during high flow periods. When the flow is between 120 m<sup>3</sup>/s and 200 m<sup>3</sup>/s the salinity is equal between the two skewed hydrograph simulations. This indicates that for very high flows, the salinity&#x2019;s response is independent of skewness and of increasing or decreasing flows.</p>
<p>The flow range in the short and long tails is equal in both simulations and varies between very low discharges and the peak flow that is close to 200 m<sup>3</sup>/s. The short and long tail seem to cause the same level of salinity variation as this fluctuates between 0 PSU and 24 PSU implying that by increasing the flow rate a salinity standard could be achieved in much shorter time.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Stratification</title>
<p>Changes in the river discharge affect the stratification. Increases in the river discharge usually result in stronger stratification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B101">Monismith et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B92">MacCready, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B114">Ralston et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Lerczak et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B141">Wei et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>) with high top to bottom density differences. Therefore, the influence of the flow distribution on the stratification is measured in this section by taking the difference of the top to bottom layer salinity. To visualize the results, the top to bottom salinity differences are averaged over radial cross-sections like it was done in section 3.1. The averaging is done over points in a distance of 3&#xa0;km and 5&#xa0;km from the river mouth (red and yellow semicircles in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1F</bold>
</xref>) to compare results between shallow locations in the delta front (i.e. area including delta channels) and deeper ones at the pro-delta (i.e. delta area beyond the channels ends) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Hori and Saito, 2007</xref>). The evolution in time of the stratification is presented for both symmetric and skewed flow distributions and for both radial sections in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>.</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(A, B)</bold> The evolution in time of the top to bottom layer difference of the radially averaged salinity in a distance 3&#xa0;km from the mouth in the symmetric and skewed flow distributions respectively. <bold>(C, D)</bold> The evolution in time of the top to bottom layer difference of the radially averaged salinity in a distance 5&#xa0;km from the mouth in the symmetric and skewed flow distributions respectively.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-10-1075683-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The shape of the hydrograph does not seem to affect the range of stratification which remains similar between the five cases in each section (3km and 5km). This range is relatively small at the 3&#xa0;km section (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5A, B</bold>
</xref>) which is the shallower one where mixing occurs under the influence of stronger bottom friction. The three symmetric hydrographs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5A</bold>
</xref>) show a stratification level that increases initially following the hydrographs shape. For example, the leptokurtic curve demonstrates initially little change in stratification for as long as the low river discharges in the hydrograph&#x2019;s tail (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1C</bold>
</xref>) do not differ much. At the same time, the platykurtic curve demonstrates a sharp increase of stratification in accordance with its hydrograph&#x2019;s sharp flow increase (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>). As the river discharge increases continuously, it crosses a threshold above which it manages to mix the water column despite the absence of other contributors (e.g., tide-induced mixing). This is usually accompanied by a seaward shift of the salt intrusion length. The level of mixing depends on the level of the peak flow. The higher the peak the lower the stratification is. In that sense, the leptokurtic is the more efficient hydrograph against stratification while the decrease of stratification in the platykurtic is not substantial. The skewed hydrographs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5B</bold>
</xref>) present similar results. Initially, the stratification increases following the flow increase but it drops when the river discharge is high enough to mix the waters. This occurs earlier in the left skewed case, 40 days after the start of the simulation and during the short tail. It occurs later in the right skewed simulation, 170 days after the start and during the long tail. In both cases, the stratification starts to increase again when the river discharge drops below a threshold value when it is not sufficient to mix the water anymore. After this point and till the end of the simulation, the top to bottom salinity differences follow the flow distribution.</p>
<p>In the deeper waters (5&#xa0;km radial section, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5C, D</bold>
</xref>), the stratification follows the flow distribution and increases/decreases when the river discharge does increase/decrease too irrespective of the hydrograph shape. Its value reaches its maximum at the time of the peak flow. Accordingly, the higher the peak flow the higher the stratification can become, and this is why the leptokurtic shows the maximum top to bottom salinity difference (17 PSU) and the platykurtic the minimum one (13 PSU). In the same concept, the two skewed simulations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5D</bold>
</xref>) show an equal maximum stratification occurring though at different time moments following the difference in the position of their peak on the hydrograph.</p>
<p>Changes in the spatial salinity distribution are reflected in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5C</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>D</bold>
</xref> as spikes, one before and another one after the peak flow. As the flow increases, the freshwater spreads radially in wider areas resulting in more symmetric spatial distributions. An example of a change in the spatial salinity distribution for the platykurtic hydrograph is given in the <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref> (section 7.3). At the moment this change occurs, the rate of stratification increase/decrease in the 1st/2nd semester also changes. The time period between the spike and the peak flow is longer in the 2nd semester when the flow decreases as a result of the slower salinity&#x2019;s response to decreasing than increasing flows.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Salt intrusion in the inlet</title>
<p>Sustained drought periods may result in salt intrusion inside the river mouth. This is often defined by the location of the 2 PSU bottom isohaline (Schubel, 1993; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B100">Monismith et&#xa0;al., 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B101">Monismith et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Herbold and Vendlinkski, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Andrews et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). The time that the salinity at the bottom of the river mouth remains below 2 PSU is measured for each simulation with the intention to detect the flow distribution that keeps the river mouth fresh for the most time. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref> shows the level of the bottom salinity at the river mouth (point A in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1F</bold>
</xref>) for the whole simulation period in each case. The five simulations start from a dry season state with very high salinity at the bottom of the mouth meaning that there is salt intrusion in the inlet. The intrusion is averted when the river flows become higher during the wet season. It is identified from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref> that the river discharge at the time the salinity falls below 2 PSU is approximately 100 m<sup>3</sup>/s in each case. The rate at which the flow rises in each hydrograph until it reaches this threshold determines the moment that the inlet&#x2019;s salt intrusion disappears first. The earliest this can happen is for the left skewed and the latest for the right skewed hydrograph. The time period that the inlet remains fresh is determined by the hydrographs&#x2019; tails and the peak flow position. <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref> displays the total number of days and the days after the peak flow that the bottom salinity at the mouth is less than 2 PSU. The symmetric distributions indicate that the lighter the tails (platykurtic) the longer the inlet is fresh (210 days). The left skewed case, which also shows light tails but for shorter time, exhibits the second longer period (189 days). Being antisymmetric to the left, the right skewed hydrograph keeps the inlet fresh for a long period as well (179 days). However, the fact that its peak occurs much later in time seems to have an effect by cutting out 10 days making it equal to the mesokurtic hydrograph. The minimum duration of all (147 days) corresponds to the leptokurtic as it exhibits the heavier tails of all. The results are slightly different when the time is measured after the peak flow. In this case, the left skewed hydrograph exhibits the longer duration (126 days) with the platykurtic being second now (119 days). This indicates that it might be better to force a peak flow to occur early in the year in order to establish a freshwater system for longer periods. This is further supported by the indication that the right skewed hydrograph manages to keep the bottom salinity at the mouth below 2 PSU only for 80 days, even 2 days less than in the leptokurtic hydrograph.</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>The total duration and the time after the peak flow that the bottom salinity is less than 2 PSU at the river mouth.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Case</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Total Duration (days)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Duration after the Peak (days)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Platykurtic</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">210</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">119</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mesokurtic</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">179</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Leptokurtic</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">147</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">82</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Left Skewed</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">189</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">126</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Right Skewed</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">179</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">80</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Salinity longitudinal distribution</title>
<p>Possible effects of the hydrographs shape on the salinity longitudinal distribution are investigated in this section. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2B</bold>
</xref>, the mean over depth and annual averages of salinity in the delta are averaged over radial cross sections every 300&#xa0;m along a distance of 6&#xa0;km from the river mouth (see cross-section AB in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1F</bold>
</xref>). This technique follows the concept of the salt intrusion curves, often used in other studies to measure cross-sectional salinity averages from the estuary mouth&#x2019;s to its head (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B118">Savenije, 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B105">Nguyen and Savenije, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B104">Nguyen et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B153">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). The annual salinity average at the river mouth is above the 2 PSU threshold in every case. This is probably caused by the long periods of heavy tails (meaning very low flows) at all hydrographs except for the platykurtic one. Having the lightest tails of all, the platykutic case presents the lowest salinity value and closest to the 2 PSU threshold at the river mouth. The spatial salinity distribution in the delta increases gradually downstream. The rate of salinity increase between two successive sections is not constant because in contrast to their length, the depth of the radial cross-sections does not increase monotonously downstream. The shape of the five curves in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2B</bold>
</xref> is very similar and does not seem to be affected by the shape of the hydrograph. A border exists 4.2&#xa0;km far from the river mouth where downstream of it the salinity is equal between the platykurtic, mesokurtic and the two skewed hydrographs. The green semi-circle in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1F</bold>
</xref> denotes the radial section of 4.2&#xa0;km. This is located at the border between the delta front and the pro-delta. Upstream of this border, hydrographs with lighter tails (platykurtic) provide a salt intrusion curve of the lowest salinity. Hydrographs with almost equal peaks and flow ranges, such as the left skewed and the mesokurtic provide the exact same spatial salinity distribution in the delta. The salinity in the right skewed is slightly higher than them. A negative effect can be deduced then when moving the peak closer to the end instead of the start of the hydrograph as it causes an increase of salinity. Downstream of the green semicircle, in the absence of the complex channels&#x2019; bathymetry and in deeper waters (pro-delta), the salt intrusion curve is the same for all cases with the exception of the leptokurtic hydrograph that still shows the highest salinity. It appears then that the salinity in deep areas is less affected by changes in a hydrograph shape.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Freshwater residence time</title>
<p>Considering the water to be fresh as long as its salinity remains below 2 PSU, its residence time is calculated to determine how long the delta remains fresh in each simulation and to what extent. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref> includes maps of the delta for each simulation displaying the total time in days that the depth averaged salinity remains below 2 PSU. The delta channels borders are delineated in the background (in black colour) to visualize the size of the area that becomes fresh in each case. The cyan color in these maps represents areas that never become fresh (freshwater RT is zero). In every case, the tendency is that the time salinity remains below 2 PSU decreases downstream in long distances from the river mouth. The peak flow seems to be the determinant factor for the extent that becomes fresh. This is almost the same for the mesokurtic (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6B</bold>
</xref>) and the two skewed cases (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;6D, E</bold>
</xref>) because their maximum flows are very close (204 m<sup>3</sup>/s in the mesokurtic and 197 m<sup>3</sup>/s in the skewed hydrographs).</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>The time in days that salinity is less than 2 PSU in the delta for the <bold>(A)</bold>Platykurtic <bold>(B)</bold>Mesokurtic <bold>(C)</bold> Leptokurtic <bold>(D)</bold> Left and <bold>(E)</bold> Right skewed hydrograph cases. The black lines in the background delineate the delta channels. White coloured spaces denote dry areas. The river inlet has been taken out from the maps and the abscissa is set to start at the river mouth. Cyan coloured areas never become fresh.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-10-1075683-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In the symmetric distributions, the delta area that becomes fresh increases with increasing peak flow. Hence, every delta channel becomes fresh when the leptokurtic hydrograph is implemented - with the exception of the two most distant ones at the top left and bottom left corner of the map. On the contrary, a more limited delta area becomes fresh with the platykurtic hydrograph (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6A</bold>
</xref>) compared to the other hydrograph cases. Interestingly though, this case provides the longest freshwater conditions period. The delta is fresh in relatively small or medium distances from the mouth for almost 7 months. The freshwater duration period of a symmetric distribution decreases as the tails of the hydrograph become heavier. Therefore, the maximum time that salinity can be below 2 PSU with the leptokurtic hydrograph is only 5 months (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6C</bold>
</xref>). In the case of the skewed hydrographs the left one (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6D</bold>
</xref>) keeps the delta fresh for more time than the right (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6E</bold>
</xref>) highlighting the importance of its hydrograph slope that shows a rapid flow rise in the 1st semester and an early in time peak discharge. The hydrograph&#x2019;s slope is identified as another crucial factor because the two cases exhibiting the faster rate of flow rise in the 1st semester (platykurtic and right skewed) provided the longer freshwater conditions in the delta.</p>
<p>In the map plots, differences in the duration within certain areas of the delta indicate bathymetry effects. There seems to be a difference of 25 days in the duration between the right and left sides of the inlet (looking seaward) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;6A, B, D</bold>
</xref>). The latter is deeper and thus the higher bottom salinity reduces the duration in comparison to the shallower areas right of the inlet. This difference is more pronounced in the right skewed case (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6E</bold>
</xref>) when the dry season is prolonged and the low freshwater flows do not manage to decrease the salinity in the deeper areas. On the other hand, this separation between deep and shallow areas is not present in the leptokurtic case (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6C</bold>
</xref>) because the peak flow is very high and can distribute symmetrically the fresh water throughout the delta.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_6">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>Flushing times</title>
<p>Following the procedure discussed in section 2.6, the FT was measured twice after determining the averaging period first by setting the start at the day of the maximum flow and second at the last day of the simulation. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7A</bold>
</xref> displays the FT for both starting days. The five simulations show comparable results when the maximum flow day is considered the starting point. In this case, the averaging period is only one day because the river flow is so high that replaces immediately the salt with fresh water and so <italic>Q<sub>F</sub>
</italic> in equation 2 is also the <italic>Q<sub>max</sub>
</italic>. Consequently, the FTs are about 1 day and the differences between the five simulations are in the order of a few hours. The order of the FT magnitude between the five hydrographs follows the order of their peaks and the higher the flow the lower the FT is.</p>
<fig id="f7" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;7</label>
<caption>
<p>The flushing time for each simulation calculated using the Date Specific Method (DSM) to determine the river discharge averaging period. <bold>(A)</bold> Comparison of the flushing time measured with the average river discharge over a period with the starting date at the day of the maximum flow (Qmax, red bars) and the last day of the simulation (Qend, green bars). <bold>(B)</bold> Comparison of the flushing time measured with the average (red bars) and the median (green bars) river discharge over a period with a starting date at the last day of the simulation.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-10-1075683-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>If the last day of the simulation is taken as the observation day to determine the averaging period, the differences in the FT between each hydrograph are more significant. The right skewed hydrograph exhibits the lowest FT (4 days) because it contains the highest flows at its end. The symmetric distributions show a progressive decrease of the FT as the hydrographs&#x2019; tails become lighter. As a result, the leptokurtic hydrograph requires the most time for water renewal (17 days) with the left skewed one demonstrating similar values since its heavy long tail occurs at the end of the simulation.</p>
<p>However, since most of the hydrographs contain very low river discharges at the end of their simulation, it is possible that the average discharge <italic>Q<sub>end</sub>
</italic> introduced in equation 2 might lead to an underestimation of the FT when the starting date is the last one. For this reason, the calculation of the FT is repeated for this specific case by introducing the median discharge over the averaging period instead of its mean value. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7B</bold>
</xref> provides a comparison between the FTs measured with the median and the average discharge. The outcome is very interesting because even though the relationship of the FTs between the various hydrographs remains the same, the values in some cases are quite different. In the leptokurtic case, the median FT is more than 120 days (4 months) while the average one was just 17 days. Clearly, the average discharge leads to an underestimation for a hydrograph with very heavy tails. Similarly, the left skewed hydrograph that also exhibits heavy tails at the end of the simulation gave a higher median FT (30 days) than its average one (17 days). In addition, the median FT uncovers a significant difference of the time required for water renewal between the leptokurtic and the left skewed hydrograph which was not detected when the average discharge was used. The left skewed hydrograph exchanges water 3 months faster than the leptokurtic according to the median FT calculation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Salinity response to river discharges</title>
<p>Results in section 3.1 indicate the existence of an asymmetry in the salinity response to flow changes. The salinity responds slower to decreasing than increasing flow independent of the hydrographs shape. This asymmetry has been identified in several estuarine studies as well (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Blanton et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Hetland and Geyer, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B119">Savenije, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B93">MacCready, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B134">Uddin and Haque, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Chen, 2015</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B119">Savenije (2005)</xref> simply stated that the replacement of fresh with saltwater takes more time. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Hetland and Geyer (2004)</xref> attributed the asymmetry in the estuarine response to the increase of the bottom drag when the flow decreases. The idealized delta presents a complex and asymmetric bathymetry so that it would be reasonable to assume an effect of the bottom drag to the salinity response. For example, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref> shows higher freshwater RT in the shallower parts of the delta for some simulations. However, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref> shows that this asymmetry does not concern periods with very high or very low flows. At these times, the salinity is equal for equal flows between the two semesters irrespective of whether the flow increases or decreases. The peak flow magnitude seems to have a strong influence. The higher the peak the shorter the asymmetry period is and the higher the salinity decreases too (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold>
</xref>). This may refer to the shorter adjustment times to large peaks in estuaries that <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Chen (2015)</xref> reported. In contrast to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Hetland and Geyer (2004)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Chen (2015)</xref> claims that the asymmetry is caused by two other factors: non-linearity of the salt flux and large variations in the river forcing. The results in section 3.1 present a direct dependence of the salinity response timescale to the flow. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94">Monismith (2017)</xref> states that this is true only in systems close to steady state although the relationship is not linear. This is most probably true for the present case since the hydrographs of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref> assume slow flow changes and this justifies the direct dependence of salinity response to river discharge observed in the results. In addition, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94">Monismith (2017)</xref> examined if it is possible to take advantage of this asymmetry and achieve a specific salinity standard with flow variations of lower freshwater volumes compared to a constant flow for the same time frame. The outcome was that the flow needed to obtain a certain salinity value (e.g., 2 PSU) increases as the period of flow variation increases. Similarly, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6C</bold>
</xref> indicates that to sustain the 2 PSU salinity threshold in its most distant position, higher flow would be required to vary for a longer period. However, this would require an increased freshwater volume compared to that of the five hydrographs.</p>
<p>The response asymmetry of salinity to flow changes can be well detected in the skewed hydrographs too (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). The effect of high flow periods when the salinity does not vary between increasing or decreasing flows is also present. Most importantly though, the conclusion is that for a given flow range a standard salinity decrease could be achieved in much shorter time if the hydrographs tails become sharper or in other words if the flow rate is increased.</p>
<p>The latter outcome could be much useful in terms of water management as it seems that for a given flow range, the increase of its rate can decrease faster the salinity and improve remarkably the conditions in the delta. The faster rate of flow change (lighter tails) is also what probably makes the platykurtic hydrograph a preferable option compared to the leptokurtic one since it sustains freshwater conditions in the delta for longer periods. This would prolong the period that the various anthropogenic activities could take place safely in the delta even though the leptokurtic hydrograph could achieve larger salinity decrease but for a limited time.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Drivers of hydrographs shape change and its impact on salinity</title>
<p>Deltas can be found at all latitudes and climatic zones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B115">Roberts et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). Although not absolute, a hydrograph&#x2019;s shape could be indicative of certain climate zones. Climate change will affect hydrological regimes in the future which can reflect as changes in hydrographs shape. Riverine flow changes result from either natural climate variability (NCV) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Deser et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>) or anthropogenic climate change (ACC) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B152">Zhang and Delworth, 2018</xref>). NCV influences riverine floods magnitude and timing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B98">Merz et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Francois et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Atmospheric processes such as intensified precipitation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B137">Viglione et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>) can increase riverine flood peak discharges (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Hall et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B154">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Such increases may result in hydrographs like the leptokurtic in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1C</bold>
</xref> that presents a sharp peak. This type of hydrograph with large differences between maximum and minimum flows is often found in monsoonal climates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Hansford et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). The results analysis in section 3 indicates that peak flow increases could result in an offshore displacement of the salt intrusion length, freshening of a larger area in the delta, mixing of the water column with freshwater and fast renewal times during this period. However, this positive effect would be only temporary if it is not accompanied by an increase of the streamflow throughout the year and the delta&#x2019;s salinity will shortly recover to its pre-peak flow state. A platykurtic hydrograph that has lower peak but smaller differences between maximum and minimum flows is more successful in retaining the delta fresh for longer periods. Increases of peak flows magnitude with thus similar effects may arise by ACC as well as for example urbanization and land use changes that decrease soil infiltration and weaken the natural buffering effect (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B139">Vogel et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B110">Prosdocimi et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Francois et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>Warmer temperatures have led to earlier spring discharges in rivers affected by snowmelt (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">IPCC, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B96">Matti et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Bloschl et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). The left skewed hydrograph&#x2019;s peak is of similar magnitude to the mesokurtic and the right skewed one but occurs earlier in time. An earlier occurrence of the same magnitude peak flow shows to have an advantage in terms of keeping the delta and its river mouth fresh for longer periods compared to the two other cases. Despite this, the annual and spatial averaged salinity remains the same between these three cases. Moreover, the earlier spring peak discharge shifts the river runoff away from the summer and the autumn which are the months with the highest water demand and so special consideration should be taken in these conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">IPCC, 2007</xref>). On the other hand, polar warming has caused a delay of winter floods in the North Sea and some sectors in the Meditteranean Coast (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Bloschl et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). In the hydrographs of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, when the peak flow is positioned late in time (right skewed) the freshwater residence time is much lower compared to other cases of equal peak flow. However, the winter&#x2019;s water renewal time may become faster in this case because of the higher flows during this period.</p>
<p>Rises of temperature, increases of evaporation and warming of the oceans in recent years has intensified droughts that have also become more frequent (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">IPCC, 2007</xref>). In addition, reduction of runoff in many regions is assumed to be the result of a poleward expansion of the subtropical dry zone due to anthropogenic climate warming (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">Lu et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B99">Milly et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>). Conversion of delta regions to arid zones due to sustained drought periods could modify their annual hydrographs into a mesokurtic shape which is the hydrograph type usually met in these zones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Hansford et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>) as is the case for the Colorado and Nile deltas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Day et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). The effect on salinity would depend mainly on the peak flow change. If the peak flow increases then an offshore displacement of the salt intrusion zone should be expected, a decrease of stratification and freshwater residence times together with a delay in water renewal times. The reverse effects should be expected if the peak flow decreases.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Effects of flow distribution on stratification</title>
<p>The evolution of stratification in time with flow changes depends a lot on bathymetry. In deep waters, it follows the hydrographs shape consistent with what is reported in many estuarine studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B101">Monismith et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B92">MacCready, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B93">MacCready, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B114">Ralston et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Lerczak et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B141">Wei et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). The level of stratification increases with the flow increase so that the leptokurtic hydrograph exhibits the maximum and the platykurtic the minimum top to bottom salinity differences. In shallow waters, the link between the stratification and the hydrograph shape breaks when the river discharge is sufficient to mix completely the water column. This is expected to happen in areas closer to the river mouth where the depth is shallower and the river discharge&#x2019;s influence stronger. This difference of stratification between deep and shallow areas is not surprising and has been reported earlier. For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B130">Sridevi et&#xa0;al. (2015)</xref> observed something similar in the Godavari estuary where the top to bottom salinity differences varied along the estuary due to bathymetric differences. Stratification was higher in deeper stations and lower in the shallow ones. Several conclusions can be drawn considering this result.</p>
<p>If the interest regarding stratification is focused inside the delta and in areas closer to the river mouth, a flow distribution that follows the leptokurtic hydrograph shows several advantages. It presents longer periods with either mixed waters or very low vertical salinity differences compared to the other hydrographs. It should be noted though that during low flow periods, the salinity can be high despite low vertical differences. Special consideration should be taken then concerning the salinity thresholds of different activities taking place in the delta. The two skewed and the mesokurtic hydrographs demonstrate a very similar stratification range in accordance with their flow range. It could be deduced then that the level of stratification may be more sensitive to the peak flow magnitude than its position in the hydrograph.</p>
<p>The range of stratification is much higher in the deeper areas (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5C, D</bold>
</xref>) and that can be explained by the weakening of the bottom friction that leads to stronger stratification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B100">Monismith et&#xa0;al., 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B122">Shaha et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). Stratification may cause anoxic conditions at the bottom layers and low oxygen can have environmental consequences to the aquatic life (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Chant, 2012</xref>). For example, riverine waters are responsible for recurrent summertime hypoxia at the bottom waters of the river dominated Mississippi Delta (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B120">Schiller et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). It is important to mention the absence of tides in this case because when present they contribute to vertical mixing reducing usually the stratification effects. For instance, active oxygen replenishment from the atmosphere is observed in the macrotidal Scheldt and Chikugo estuaries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B131">Sun et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). It should be expected then that many of these conclusions could be relatively different in systems with high tide.</p>
<p>The same may apply if future sea level rise (SLR) scenarios are considered. SLR can strengthen the stratification as it is reported for example in the Pearl River Estuary (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Hong et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Shallower sections may become deep in certain SLR future scenarios, something that would increase stratification and thus require changes to water management to avert the subsequent implications. On the other hand, some recent studies suggest that the SLR effect on SI is often less significant than that of a decrease of upstream flows (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Akter, 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Bellafiore et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Flow seasonality must be considered as well when assessing the SLR effect as this is expected to be stronger during low discharge periods. For instance, in their modeling experiments, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Bricheno et&#xa0;al. (2021)</xref> found that the SLR effect to SI in the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Ganges delta is enhanced during dry season but counteracted during wet season by an enhanced monsoon. For the same delta, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Akter, 2019</xref>) identified a local impact to SI from SLR while decreases of the freshwater flow were found to affect the entire region.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_4">
<label>4.4</label>
<title>Hydrograph shape effects on water renewal and freshwater residence times</title>
<p>The results of sections 3.5 and 3.6 indicate that each hydrograph type has certain advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, the decision on the selection of an optimum hydrograph regarding water quality should be per case and according to water management demands. The peak flow magnitude and the tails of each hydrograph are important parameters affecting freshwater RT and water renewal time. An incremental increase of the peak flow results in a seaward salt intrusion limit displacement due to the negative correlation between river discharge and salinity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Garvine et&#xa0;al., 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B146">Wong, 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B101">Monismith et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Becker et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). This is reflected in the panels of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref> as an increase of the freshwater area with the peak flow increase. The freshwater area and RT follow an opposite trend. An increase of the peak flow results in an increase of the freshwater area but decrease of the RT. This is a consequence of the heavier tails that the hydrographs with higher peak flows exhibit. For example, the leptokurtic hydrograph shows the lowest RT because of its sharp peak and the uneven flow distribution throughout the year. For the same reason, the leptokurtic dry season FT is also the maximum one since the freshwater cannot be fast enough replenished in such low flow conditions. Heavy tails cause also the leptokurtic hydrograph to present the maximum annual and space averaged salinity while the platykurtic shows the minimum.</p>
<p>Hydrographs of similar flow range and peak flows (e.g., skewed and mesokurtic) make fresh almost equal areas (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>). However, the RT may vary between them because of bathymetry or the time of the peak flow in the hydrograph. For example, the left skewed hydrograph shows higher RT which indicates positive effect of an early peak river discharge. In contrast, when the peak flow is positioned at the end of the year (right skewness) the RT decreases significantly. In the last case, bathymetric effects are more pronounced because the difference in the RT between shallow and deeper areas is much higher than the two other cases.</p>
<p>Estimations of the water renewal time are important considering the increase in tracers transport times expected in the future for both seasons because of SLR (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Hong and Shen, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Ahn et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Hong et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Flushing times in estuaries and deltas are also expected to increase for the same cause. FT is known to vary a lot with seasonality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Ensign et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>) and this results in different order of FTs between the five hydrographs during wet and dry season. FT gets shorter values during wet and higher during dry seasons.The critical parameters for the FT are the peak flow in the wet and the hydrographs tails in the dry season. However, the effect of the tails in the second case is much stronger than that of the peak discharges in the first case. The hydrographs shape does not significantly influence the FT during wet seasons. Although the FT decreases with the increase of the peak flow the difference is only within the range of hours. In contrast, the FT increases by days as the tails become heavier. The selection of the statistical river discharge value to be introduced in the freshwater fraction method equation is very important in the case of heavy tails such as those of the leptokurtic and left skewed hydrographs. The use of an average over a period of very low discharges such as those included in hydrographs with heavy tails can decrease the FT and provide an unrealistic estimation of the renewal time (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Alber and Sheldon, 1999</xref>). The use of the median discharge is proposed instead. <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref> summarizes the overall conclusions of the study by providing the basic advantages and disadvantages of each flow regime.</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>A summary of the effects in stratification, flushing and residence times and freshwater areas caused by the main characteristics of the flow regimes under consideration.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Shape</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Stratification</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Flushing time</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Residence Time</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Freshwater Areas</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="background-color:#4f81bd">
<bold>Light tails and small differences between high and low flow seasons (e.g., platykurtic,</bold> <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>
<bold>)</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="background-color:#b8cce4">Little effectiveness compared to other flow distributions</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="background-color:#b8cce4">Very efficient, fast water renewal in both high and low flow season</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="background-color:#b8cce4">Water can remain fresh for significantly long periods</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="background-color:#b8cce4">Limited size covering only areas close to the delta apex</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="background-color:#4f81bd">
<bold>Heavy tails and large differences between high and low flow seasons (e.g., leptokurtic,</bold> <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1C</bold>
</xref>
<bold>)</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="background-color:#dbe5f1">Full mixing during high flow season in shallow and close to the delta apex areas but strong stratification in deeper delta areas</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="background-color:#dbe5f1">Very low efficiency, slow water renewal especially during low flow season</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="background-color:#dbe5f1">Water remains fresh for limited time in most delta areas</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="background-color:#dbe5f1">Farthest seaward displacement of the saltwater zone, freshwater can cover temporarily the entire delta</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="background-color:#4f81bd">
<bold>Peak flow closer to the start, falling limb on the right (e.g., left skewness,</bold> <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1D</bold>
</xref>
<bold>)</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="background-color:#b8cce4">Little effectiveness, limited for a short period after the flow crosses a certain threshold and mixes temporarily the water</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="background-color:#b8cce4">Slow water renewal especially during low flow season</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="background-color:#b8cce4">Water can remain fresh for relatively long periods</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="background-color:#b8cce4">Much efficient, can cover wider area than platykurtic but smaller than leptokurtic case</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="background-color:#4f81bd">
<bold>Peak flow closer to the end, rising limb on the left (e.g., right skewness,</bold> <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1E</bold>
</xref>
<bold>)</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="background-color:#dbe5f1">Little effectiveness, limited for a short period after the flow crosses a certain threshold and mixes temporarily the water</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="background-color:#dbe5f1">Fast water renewal compared to the other cases for both seasons</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="background-color:#dbe5f1">Water remains fresh for limited time in deep but for longer time in shallow delta areas</td>
<td valign="top" align="left" style="background-color:#dbe5f1">Much efficient, can cover wider area than platykurtic but smaller than leptokurtic case</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>In this study, the impact of different flow regimes on the salinity distribution in deltaic systems has been investigated. The work is motivated by the need to moderate saltwater intrusion consequences in deltas by better management of existing freshwater resources instead of resorting to expensive and harmful to the environment technical solutions. A 3D numerical model built in Delft3D for an idealized delta configuration was implemented for this purpose. Five test cases were considered, three of them with flow regimes of annual symmetric distribution but different flow range and two others with annual hydrographs of left and right skewness. To avoid complexity that could obscure direct conclusions, the simulations do not consider tides and Coriolis force was neglected. This may compromise the conclusions which might be then most applicable to river dominated deltas with little tidal influence and in medium latitudes.</p>
<p>The results analysis leads to interesting conclusions regarding the impact of various flow regimes on stratification, water renewal, freshwater area extent and residence times. In addition, the salinity response to flow changes has been assessed. It was found that the salinity responds slower to river discharge decreases than increases which is in accordance with what is stated in similar estuarine studies. The effect of flow regimes on stratification and mixing differs between shallow and deep areas in the delta. In deep waters and far from the delta apex, the top to bottom layer salinity difference follows the shape of the hydrograph and increases as the river discharge increases. In this case, leptokurtic and platykurtic hydrographs show the highest and lowest stratification level respectively following the difference in their peak flows. However, the reverse occurs in shallower and closer to the main trunk channel delta areas because the river discharge can mix the water column when crossing a certain flow threshold.</p>
<p>A hydrograph&#x2019;s shape was found to be determinant factor for freshwater areas extent, renewal, and residence times. Platykurtic hydrographs present the maximum freshwater residence times because of their light tails (i.e., sharp flow increase) and small differences between maximum to minimum flow allowing an even water distribution throughout the year. The bathymetry is another crucial parameter as shallow areas remain fresh for longer periods. On the contrary, the extent of freshwater areas is determined by peak flows and therefore a leptokurtic hydrograph results in the farthest seaward displacement of the salt intrusion limit. Finally, the flow regime affects flushing times mainly during low flow periods. Water renewal becomes slower in the case of hydrographs with heavy tails (i.e., long periods with relatively low flows) rendering the leptokurtic hydrograph as the least efficient case. It was also discovered that the median instead of the mean over the averaging period river discharge results in more realistic and valid flushing times when hydrographs with very long low flow periods are considered.</p>
<p>The work in this paper indicates that it is possible to mitigate saltwater intrusion in deltas by applying water supply regulations. Each flow regime demonstrates different benefits for the various parameters under consideration (e.g., freshwater area and residence time) which should be accounted before any decisions for modifying existing hydrographs shape into another type. Nevertheless, the present study focuses on river flow forcing only and thus further research might be needed to determine the impact of other parameters such as for example tide-induced mixing and wind forcing.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are publicly available. This data can be found here: <uri xlink:href="https://zenodo.org/record/7373598#.Y9BAq3bP13gdoi:10.5281/zenodo.7373598">https://zenodo.org/record/7373598#.Y9BAq3bP13gdoi:10.5281/zenodo.7373598</uri>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>CM: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Pre- and Post-processing, Visualization, Formal analysis, Writing, Original draft and reviewed versions preparation. LA: Supervision, reviewing and editing. LB: Supervision, reviewing and editing. NL: Supervision, reviewing and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The work contained in this paper contains work conducted during a PhD study supported by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) EAO Doctoral Training Partnership whose support is gratefully acknowledged. Grant ref NE/L002469/1. Funding support from the School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool are also gratefully acknowledged. For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1075683/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1075683/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Adams</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <source>World commission on dams, dams and development: A new framework for decision-making</source> Vol. <volume>1</volume> (<publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>EarthScan</publisher-name>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>28</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ahmed</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rahman</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <source>Water supply and sanitation&#x2013;rural and low-income urban communities. ITN&#x2013;bangladesh, center for water supply and waste management, BUET, dhaka, bangladesh with contribution from IRC</source> (<publisher-loc>The Netherlands</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>International Water and Sanitation Center, Delft</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ahn</surname> <given-names>D. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hoang</surname> <given-names>L. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bui</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rutschmann</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Simulating future flows and salinity intrusion using combined one- and two-dimensional hydrodynamic modeling-the case of hau river, Vietnamese Mekong delta</article-title>. <source>Water</source> <volume>10</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>21</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/w10070897</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Akter</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The dominant climate change event for salinity intrusion in the GBM delta</article-title>. <source>Climate</source> <volume>7</volume>, <elocation-id>69</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/cli7050069</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Alber</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sheldon</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Use of a date-specific method to examine variability in the flushing times of Georgia estuaries</article-title>. <source>Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci.</source> <volume>49</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>469</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>482</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/ecss.1999.0515</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Allison</surname> <given-names>L. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1964</year>). <article-title>Salinity in relation to irrigation</article-title>. <source>Adv. Agron.</source> <volume>16</volume> (<issue>C</issue>), <fpage>139</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>180</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60023-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Andrews</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gross</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hutton</surname> <given-names>P. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Modeling salt intrusion in the San Francisco estuary prior to anthropogenic influence&#x2019;</article-title>. <source>Continental Shelf Research</source> <volume>146</volume>, <fpage>58</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>81</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.106/j.csr.2017.07.010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Balls</surname> <given-names>P. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>&#x2018;Nutrient inputs to estuaries from nine scottish east coast rivers; influence of estuarine processes on inputs to the north sea&#x2019;</article-title>. <source>Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>329</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>352</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/ecss.1994.1068</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Banas</surname> <given-names>N. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hickey</surname> <given-names>B. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>MacCready</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Newton</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Dynamics of willapa bay, Washington: A highly unsteady, partially mixed estuary</article-title>. <source>J. Phys. Oceanogr.</source> <volume>34</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>2413</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2427</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1175/JPO2637.1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Becker</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luettich</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names> <suffix>Jr</suffix>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mallin</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Hydrodynamic behavior of the cape fear river and estuarine system: A synthesis and observational investigation of discharge-salinity intrusion relationships</article-title>. <source>Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.</source> <volume>88</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>407</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>418</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecss.2010.04.022</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bellafiore</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ferrarin</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maicu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manfe</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lorenzetti</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Umgiesser</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Saltwater intrusion in a Mediterranean delta under a changing climate</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans</source> <volume>126</volume>, <elocation-id>e2020JC016437</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2020JC016437</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bhuiyan</surname> <given-names>M. J. A. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dutta</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Assessing impacts of sea level rise on river salinity in the gorai river network, Bangladesh</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Estuarine, coastal and shelf science</source>, vol. <volume>96</volume>. (<publisher-name>Elsevier Ltd</publisher-name>), <fpage>219</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>227</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecss.2011.11.005</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Birkinshaw</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guerreiro</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nicholson</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Quinn</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Climate change impacts on Yangtze river discharge at the three gorges dam</article-title>. <source>Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.</source> <volume>21</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>1911</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1927</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/hess-21-1911-2017</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Blanton</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alber</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sheldon</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Salinity response of the satilla river estuary to seasonal changes in freshwater discharge</article-title>. <source>Proceedings of the 2001 Georgia Water Resources Conference, held March 26-27, 2001, at the University of Georgia</source>. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Hatcher</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> editor <publisher-loc>Athens, Georgia</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Institute of Ecology, The University of Georgia</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bloschl</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hall</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parajka</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perdigao</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Merz</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arheimer</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Changing climate shifts timing of European floods</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>357</volume> (<issue>6351</issue>), <fpage>588</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>590</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aan2506</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bowen</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Salt transport and the time-dependent salt balance of a partially stratified estuary</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res.</source> <volume>108</volume> (<issue>C5</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2001jc001231</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bricheno</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wolf</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Islam</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Tidal intrusion within a mega delta: An unstructured grid modeling approach</article-title>. <source>Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci.</source> <volume>182</volume>, <fpage>12</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>26</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecss.2016.09.014</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bricheno</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wolf</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Saline intrusion in the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna megadelta</article-title>. <source>Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci.</source> <volume>252</volume>, <fpage>107246</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecss.2021.107246</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Brockway</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bowers</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hoguane</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dove</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vassele</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>A note on salt intrusion in funnel-shaped estuaries: Application to the incomati estuary, Mozambique</article-title>. <source>Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci.</source> <volume>66</volume> (<issue>1&#x2013;2</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecss.2005.07.014</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bryson</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1974</year>). <article-title>Heavy tailed distributions: Properties and tests</article-title>. <source>Technometrics</source> <volume>16</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>61</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>68</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00401706.1974.10489150</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Burpee</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Slingerland</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Edmonds</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parsons</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Best</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cederberg</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Grain-size controls on the morphology and internal geometry of river-dominated deltas</article-title>. <source>J. Sediment. Res.</source> <volume>85</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>699</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>714</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2110/jsr.2015.39</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Caldwell</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Edmonds</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>The effects of sediment properties on deltaic processes and morphologies: A numerical modeling study</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res.</source> <volume>119</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>961</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>982</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/2013JF002871.Received</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chant</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <source>Interactions between estuaries and coasts: River plumes - their formation, transport, and dispersal, treatise on estuarine and coastal science</source> (<publisher-name>Elsevier Inc</publisher-name>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-12-374711-2.00209-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Modeling hydrodynamics and salt transport in the alafia river estuary, Florida during may 1999-December 2001</article-title>. <source>Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci.</source> <volume>61</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>477</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>490</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecss.2004.06.012</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hsu</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>&#x2018;Modeling assessment of a saltwater intrusion and a transport time scale response to sea-level rise in a tidal estuary&#x2019;</article-title>. <source>Environ. Fluid Mech.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>491</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>514</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10652-014-9367-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S. N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Asymmetric estuarine responses to changes in river forcing: A consequence of nonlinear salt flux</article-title>. <source>J. Phys. Oceanogr.</source> <volume>45</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>2836</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2847</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1175/JPO-D-15-0085.1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Flannery</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moore</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Response times of salinity in relation to changes in freshwater inflows in the lower hillsborough river, Florida</article-title>. <source>Estuaries</source> <volume>23</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>735</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>742</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1352899</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zong</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Human impacts on the changjiang (Yangtze) river basin, China, with special reference to the impacts on the dry season water discharges into the sea</article-title>. <source>Geomorphology</source> <volume>41</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>111</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>123</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0169-555X(01)00109-X</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Choi</surname> <given-names>K. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>J. H. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Numerical determination of flushing time for stratified water bodies</article-title>. <source>J. Mar. Syst.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>263</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>281</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.106/j.marsys.2004.04.005</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Christian</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boyer</surname> <given-names>J. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stanley</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> <article-title>&#x2019;Multi-year distribution patterns of nutrients within the neuse river estuary. north carolina</article-title>. <source>Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.</source> <volume>71</volume>, <fpage>259</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>274</lpage>. <uri xlink:href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/24817298">https://www.jstor.org/stable/24817298</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Clarke</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jahiruddin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parks</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Salehin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Projections of on-farm salinity in coastal Bangladesh</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci.: Process. Impacts R. Soc. Chem.</source> <volume>17</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1127</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1136</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1039/c4em00682h</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Conner</surname> <given-names>W. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McLeod</surname> <given-names>K.W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McCarron</surname> <given-names>J. K</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>&#x2018;Flooding and salinity effects on growth and survival of four common forested wetland species.&#x2019;</article-title>. <source>Wetland Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>99</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>109</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stive</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Unusual salinity conditions in the Yangtze estuary in 2006: Impacts of an extreme drought or of the three gorges dam</article-title>? <source>Ambio</source> <volume>40</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>496</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>505</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13280-011-0148-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Das</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Justic</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Inoue</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hoda</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Park</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Impacts of Mississippi river diversions on salinity gradients in a deltaic Louisiana estuary: Ecological and management implications</article-title>. <source>Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci. Elsevier Ltd</source> <volume>111</volume>, <fpage>17</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>26</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecss.2012.06.005</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dasgupta</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kamal</surname> <given-names>F.A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Choudhury</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nishat</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>River salinity and climate change: Evidence from coastal Bangladesh</article-title>. <source>World Sci. Ref. Asia World Econ.</source>, <fpage>205</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>242</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1142/9789814578622_0031</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dawadi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ahmad</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Evaluating the impact of demand-side management on water resources under changing climatic conditions and increasing population</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Manage. Elsevier Ltd</source> <volume>114</volume>, <fpage>261</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>275</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.015</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Day</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barras</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Clairian</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johnston</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Justic</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kemp</surname> <given-names>G. P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Implications of global climatic change and energy cost and availability for the restoration of the Mississippi delta</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Eng.</source> <volume>24</volume> (<issue>4 SPEC. ISS.</issue>), <fpage>253</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>265</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoleng.2004.11.015</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Day</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goodman</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hunter</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giosan</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Deltas in Arid environments</article-title>. <source>Water</source> <volume>13</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>1677</fpage> (<publisher-loc>Switzerland</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Water</publisher-name>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/w13121677</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>Deltares</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Delft3D-flow: Simulation of multi-dimensional hydrodynamic flows and transport phenomena, including sediments</article-title>. <source>User Manual Hydro-Morphodynamics</source> <volume>3.15</volume>, <fpage>34158</fpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Deser</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Knutti</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Solomon</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Phillips</surname> <given-names>A.S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Communication of the role of natural variability in future north America climate</article-title>. <source>Natural Climate Change</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>775</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>779</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/NCLIMATE1562</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dyer</surname> <given-names>K. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1973</year>). <source>Estuaries: A physical introduction</source> (<publisher-loc>London UK</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>John Wiley and Sons</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Edmonds</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Slingerland</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Significant effect of sediment cohesion on deltamorphology</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Nature geoscience</source>, vol. <volume>3</volume>. (<publisher-name>Nature Publishing Group</publisher-name>), <fpage>105</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>109</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ngeo730</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Eldardiry</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hossain</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Understanding reservoir operating rules in the transboundary nile river basin using macroscale hydrologic modeling with satellite measurements</article-title>. <source>J. Hydrometeorol.</source> <volume>20</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>2253</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2269</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1175/JHM-D-19-0058.1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ensign</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Halls</surname> <given-names>J. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mallin</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Application of digital bathymetry data in an analysis of flushing times of two large estuaries</article-title>. <source>Comput. Geosci.</source> <volume>30</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>501</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>511</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cageo.2004.03.015</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Eslami</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hoekstra</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trung</surname> <given-names>N. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kantoush</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Doan</surname> <given-names>V. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Do</surname> <given-names>D. D</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Tidal amplification and salt intrusion in the Mekong delta driven by anthropogenic sediment starvation</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>9</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-019-55018-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Eyre</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Twigg</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>&#x2018;Nutrient behaviour during post-flood recovery of the richmond river estuary northern NSW</article-title>. <source>Australia&#x2019;. Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci.</source> <volume>44</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>311</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>326</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/ecss.1996.0124</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fischer</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>List</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Imberger</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koh</surname> <given-names>R. C. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brooks</surname> <given-names>N. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1979</year>). <source>Mixing in inland and coastal waters</source> (<publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Francois</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schlef</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Borwn</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Design considerations for riverine floods in a changing climate &#x2013; a review</article-title>. <source>J. Hydrol.</source> <volume>547</volume>, <fpage>557</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>573</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.04.068</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Frihy</surname> <given-names>O. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>The nile delta-Alexandria coast: Vulnerability to sea-level rise, consequences and adaptation</article-title>. <source>Mitigation Adapt. Strat. Global Change</source> <volume>8</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>115</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>138</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1026015824714</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Galloway</surname> <given-names>W. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1975</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Process framework for describing the morphologic and stratigraphic evolution of deltaic depositional systems</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Deltas: Model for exploration</source> (<publisher-name>Houston Geological Society</publisher-name>), <fpage>p.87</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>p.98</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Garvine</surname> <given-names>R. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McCarthy</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wong</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>The axial salinity distribution in the delaware estuary and its weak response to river discharge</article-title>. <source>Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci.</source> <volume>35</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>157</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>165</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0272-7714(05)80110-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gleick</surname> <given-names>P. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Soft paths water</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>418</volume> (<issue>July</issue>), <fpage>2002</fpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gleick</surname> <given-names>P. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Global freshwater resources: Soft-path solutions for the 21st century</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>302</volume> (<issue>5650</issue>), <fpage>1524</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1528</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1089967</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Glen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Heavy Tailed Distribution &amp; Light Tailed Distribution: Definition &amp; Examples</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>From StatisticsHowTo.com: Elementary Statistics for the rest of us</source>! Available at: <uri xlink:href="https://www.statisticshowto.com/heavy-tailed-distribution/">https://www.statisticshowto.com/heavy-tailed-distribution/</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>The response of salt intrusion to changes in river discharge and tidal mixing during the dry season in the modaomen estuary, China</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Continental shelf research</source>, vol. <volume>31</volume>. (<publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>), <fpage>769</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>788</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.csr.2011.01.011</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gornitz</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Global coastal hazards from future sea level rise</article-title>. <source>Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.</source> <volume>89</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>379</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>398</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0031-0182(91)90173-O</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ha</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dieperink</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tri</surname> <given-names>V. P. D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Otter</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hoekstra</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Governance conditions for adaptive freshwater management in the Vietnamese Mekong delta</article-title>. <source>J. Hydrol.</source> <volume>557</volume>, <fpage>116</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>127</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.12.024</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hagy</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boynton</surname> <given-names>W. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sanford</surname> <given-names>L. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>&#x2018;Estimation of net physical transport and hydraulic residence times for a coastal plain estuary using box models&#x2019;</article-title>. <source>Estuaries</source> <volume>23</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>328</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>340</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1353325</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hall</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Understanding flood regime changes in Europe: a state-of-the-art assessment</article-title>. <source>Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>2735</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2772</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/hess-18-2735-2014</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hansford</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Plink-Bjorklund</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>E. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Global quantitative analyses of river discharge variability and hydrograph shape with respect to climate types</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Earth-science reviews</source>, vol. <volume>200</volume>. (<publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>), <fpage>102977</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102977</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Herbold</surname>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vendlinkski</surname>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Modeling estuarine habitat in the bay delta, unifying one and three dimensional approaches to modeling X2 and the low salinity zone</article-title>. <source>Tech. Workshop Estuary Habitat</source>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hetland</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Geyer</surname> <given-names>W. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>An idealized study of the structure of long, partially mixed estuaries</article-title>. <source>J. Phys. Oceanogr.</source> <volume>34</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>2677</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2691</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1175/JPO2646.1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hoitink</surname> <given-names>A. J. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vermeulen</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huismans</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kastner</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Tidal controls on river delta morphology</article-title>. <source>Nat. geosci.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>637</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>645</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/NGEO3000</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Holm</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sasser</surname> <given-names>C. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Differential salinity response between two Mississippi river subdeltas: Implications for changes in plant composition</article-title>. <source>Estuaries</source> <volume>24</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>78</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>89</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1352815</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hong</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Potential physical impacts of sea-level rise on the pearl river estuary, China</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Journal of marine systems</source>, vol. <volume>201</volume>. (<publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>), <fpage>103245</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jmarsys.2019.103245</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hong</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Responses of estuarine salinity and transport processes to potential future sea-level rise in the Chesapeake bay</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Estuarine, coastal and shelf science</source>, vol. <volume>104&#x2013;105</volume>. (<publisher-name>Elsevier Ltd</publisher-name>), <fpage>33</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>45</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecss.2012.03.014</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hori</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saito</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Classification, architecture and evolution of Large-river deltas</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Large Rivers: Geomorphology and management</source>. Ed. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-name>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</publisher-name>), <fpage>75</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>96</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Horner-Devine</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hetland</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>MacDonald</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Mixing and transport in coastal river plumes</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>569</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>594</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-fluid-010313-141408</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>The effect of deep waterway constructions on hydrodynamics and salinities in Yangtze estuary, China</article-title>. <source>J. Coast. Res.</source> <volume>SPEC. ISSUE 56)</volume>, <fpage>961</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>965</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Hydrodynamic modeling of flushing time in a small estuary of north bay, florida, USA</article-title>. <source>Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci.</source> <volume>74</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>722</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>731</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecss.2007.05.016</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Spaulding</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>&#x2018;Modelling residence-time response to freshwater input in apalachicola bay, florida, USA&#x2019;</article-title>. <source>Hydrological Processes</source> <volume>16</volume> (<issue>15</issue>), <fpage>3051</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3064</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/hyp.1088</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hutton</surname> <given-names>P. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rath</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ungs</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roy</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Nine decades of salinity observations in the San Francisco bay and delta: Modeling and trend evaluations</article-title>. <source>J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage.</source> <volume>142</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000617</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B73">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>IPCC</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change</source>, vol. <volume>ch1.3</volume> . Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Parry</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Canziani</surname> <given-names>O. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Palutikof</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Linden</surname> <given-names>P. J. v. d.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hanson</surname> <given-names>C. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>Cambridge, UK</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Cambridge University Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>pp.85</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>pp111</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B74">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jassby</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kimmerer</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Monismith</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Armor</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cloern</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Powell</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Isohaline position as a habitat indicator for estuarine populations</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Appl.</source> <volume>5</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>272</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>289</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1942069</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B75">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kakoulaki</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>MacDonald</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Horner-Devine</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>The role of wind in the near field and midfield of a river plume</article-title>. <source>Geophys.Res. Lett.</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>5132</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5138</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/2014GL060606</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B76">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kaplan</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Munoz-Carpena</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hedgepeth</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roberts</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Linking river, floodplain, and vadose zone hydrology to improve restoration of a coastal river affected by saltwater intrusion</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Qual.</source> <volume>39</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>1570</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1584</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/jeq2009.0375</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B77">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kastner</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>The influence of wind and waves on spreading and mixing in the Fraser river plume</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans</source> <volume>123</volume>, <fpage>6818</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6840</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2018JC013765</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B78">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kolker</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>) <source>The impacts of the Mississippi river and its delta on the oceanography, ecology and economy of the gulf of Mexico Large marine ecosystem</source>. Available at: <uri xlink:href="http://mississippiriverdelta.org/files/2018/08/Known-Impacts-of-the-Mississippi-River.pdf">http://mississippiriverdelta.org/files/2018/08/Known-Impacts-of-the-Mississippi-River.pdf</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B79">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lai</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lai</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Impact of lake inflow and the Yangtze River flow alterations on water levels in Poyang Lake,China</article-title>. <source>Lake Reserv. Manage.</source> <volume>30</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>321</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>330</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10402381.2014.928390</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B80">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lamb</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nittrouer</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mohrig</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shaw</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Backwater and river plume controls on scour upstream of river mouths: implications for fluvio-deltaic morphodynamics</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res.</source> <volume>117</volume>, <fpage>F01002</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2011JF002079</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B81">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Latrubesse</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stevaux</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sinha</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Tropical rivers</article-title>. <source>Geomorphology</source> <volume>70</volume> (<issue>3-4 SPEC. ISS.</issue>), <fpage>187</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>206</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.02.005</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B82">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lebo</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharp</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cifuentes</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>&#x2018;Contribution of river phosphate variations to apparent reactivity estimated from phosphate-salinity diagrams&#x2019;</article-title>. <source>Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>583</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>594</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0272-7714(06)80011-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B83">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Leonardi</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Canestrelli</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fagherazzi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Effect of tides on mouth bar morphology and hydrodynamics</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans</source> <volume>118</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>4169</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4183</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jgrc.20302</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B84">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lerczak</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Geyer</surname> <given-names>W. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ralston</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>The temporal response of the length of a partially stratified estuary to changes in river flow and tidal amplitude</article-title>. <source>J. Phys. Oceanogr.</source> <volume>39</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>915</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>933</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1175/2008JPO3933.1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B85">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lienou</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mahe</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dieulin</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paturel</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bamba</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sighomnou</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>The river Niger water availability: Facing future needs and climate change</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Global change: facing risks and threats to water resources: Proceedings of the sixth world FRIEND conference</source>, vol. <volume>340</volume>. (<publisher-name>Wallingford: AISH</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B86">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hsu</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuo</surname> <given-names>A. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuo</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>The influence of river discharge on salinity intrusion in the tanshui estuary, Taiwan</article-title>. <source>J. Coast. Res.</source> <volume>17</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>544</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>552</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B87">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>R. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hsu</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuo</surname> <given-names>A. Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Modeling the influence of river discharge on salt intrusion and residual circulation in danshuei river estuary, Taiwan</article-title>. <source>Cont. Shelf Res.</source> <volume>27</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>900</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>921</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.csr.2006.12.005</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B88">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>The characteristics and causes of increasingly severe saltwater intrusion in pearl river estuary</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Estuarine, coastal and shelf science</source>, vol. <volume>220</volume>. (<publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>), <fpage>54</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>63</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecss.2019.02.041</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B89">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Numerical simulation for the effects of waves and grain size on deltaic processes and morphologies</article-title>. <source>Open Geosci.</source> <volume>12</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>1286</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1301</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1515/geo-2020-0196</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B90">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vecchi</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reichler</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Expansion of the Hadley cell under global warming</article-title>. <source>Geophys. Res. Lett.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>L06805</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2006GL028443</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B91">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>MacCready</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Estuarine adjustment to changes in river flow and tidal mixing</article-title>. <source>J. Phys. Oceanogr.</source> <volume>29</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>708</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>726</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1175/1520-0485(1999)029&lt;0708:EATCIR&gt;2.0.CO;2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B92">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>MacCready</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Toward a unified theory of tidally-averaged estuarine salinity structure</article-title>. <source>Estuaries</source> <volume>27</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>561</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>570</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02907644</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B93">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>MacCready</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Estuarine adjustment</article-title>. <source>J. Phys. Oceanogr.</source> <volume>37</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>2133</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2145</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1175/JPO3082.1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B94">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Monismith</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>An integral model of unsteady salinity intrusion in estuaries</article-title>. <source>J. Hydraulic Res.</source> <volume>55</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>392</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>408</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00221686.2016.1274682</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B95">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Matsoukis</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Amoudry</surname> <given-names>L. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bricheno</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leonardi</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Numerical investigation of river discharge and tidal variation impact on salinity intrusion in a generic river delta through idealized modelling</article-title>. <source>Estuaries Coasts</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>57</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>83</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12237-022-01109-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B96">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Matti</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dahlke</surname> <given-names>H. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dieppois</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lawler</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lyon</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Flood seasonality across Scandinavia &#x2013; evidence of a shifting hydrograph</article-title>? <source>Hydrol. Process.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>4354</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4370</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/hyp.11365</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B97">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>McCabe</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>MacCready</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hickey</surname> <given-names>B. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Ebb tide dynamics and spreading of a large river plume</article-title>. <source>J. Phys. Oceanogr.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>2839</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2856</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B98">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Merz</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aerts</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arnbjerg-Nielsen</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baldi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Becker</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bichet</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Floods and climate: emerging perspectives for flood risk assessment and management</article-title>. <source>Natural Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>1921</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1942</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/nhess-14-1921-2014</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B99">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Milly</surname> <given-names>P. C. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Betancourt</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Falkenmark</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hirsch</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kundzewicz</surname> <given-names>Z. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lettenmaier</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stouffer</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Stationarity is dead: Whiter water management</article-title>? <source>Science</source> <volume>319</volume>, <fpage>573</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>574</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.11519</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B100">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Monismith</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burau</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stacey</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Stratification dynamics and gravitational circulation in northern San Francisco Bay</article-title>. In: <source>San Francisco Bay: The Ecosystem</source> edited by <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Hollibaugh</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> <publisher-loc>Washington, D. C.</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Am. Assoc. for the Advance. of Sci.</publisher-name>, pp. <fpage>123</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>153</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B101">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Monismith</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kimmerer</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burau</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stacey</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Structure and flow-induced variability of the subtidal salinity field in northern San Francisco bay</article-title>. <source>J. Phys. Oceanogr.</source> <volume>32</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>3003</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3019</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032&lt;3003:SAFIVO&gt;2.0.CO;2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B102">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Montanari</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Hydrology of the po river: Looking for changing patterns in river discharge</article-title>. <source>Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.</source> <volume>16</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>3739</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3747</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/hess-16-3739-2012</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B103">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Murray</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Seeking explanation affects numerical modeling strategies</article-title>. <source>Eos</source> <volume>83</volume> (<issue>38</issue>), <fpage>418</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>419</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2002EO000304</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B104">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Savenije</surname> <given-names>H. H. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pham</surname> <given-names>D. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>D. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Using salt intrusion measurements to determine the freshwater discharge distribution over the branches of a multi-channel estuary: The Mekong delta case</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Estuarine, coastal and shelf science</source>, vol. <volume>77</volume>. , <fpage>433</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>445</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecss.2007.10.010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B105">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Savenije</surname> <given-names>H. H. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Hydrology and earth system sciences salt intrusion in multi-channel estuaries: a case study in the Mekong delta, Vietnam</article-title>. <source>Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>743</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>754</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/hess-10-743-2006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B106">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nobi</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Das Gupta</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Simulation of regional flow and salinity intrusion in an integrated stream-aquifer system in coastal region: Southwest region of Bangladesh</article-title>. <source>Ground Water</source> <volume>35</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>786</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>796</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1745-6584.1997.tb00147.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B107">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Phan</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smart</surname> <given-names>J. C. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sahin</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Capon</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hadwen</surname> <given-names>W. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Assessment of the vulnerability of a coastal freshwater system to climatic and non-climatic changes: A system dynamics approach</article-title>. <source>J. Cleaner Prod.</source> <volume>183</volume>, <fpage>940</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>955</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.169</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B108">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pilson</surname> <given-names>M. E. Q.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>&#x2018;On the residence time of water in narragansett bay&#x2019;</article-title>. <source>Estuaries</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>2</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B109">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pitlick</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cress</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <source>Longitudinal trends in channel characteristics of the Colorado river and implications for food-web dynamics</source> <publisher-name>(Grand Junction, Colorado: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serv.)</publisher-name>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B110">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Prosdocimi</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kjeldsen</surname> <given-names>T. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>&#x2019;Detection and attribution of urbanization effect on flood extremes using nonstationary flood-frequency models</article-title>. <source>Water Resour. Res.</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>4244</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4262</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/2015WR017065</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B111">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Assessing the influence of Sea level rise on salt transport processes and estuarine circulation in the changjiang river estuary</article-title>. <source>J. Coast. Res.</source> <volume>31</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>661</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>670</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-13-00138.1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B112">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rahman</surname> <given-names>M. D. M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mustafi</surname> <given-names>M. A. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Islam</surname> <given-names>A. F.M.T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mohammad</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>The effect of rainfall, temperature and humidity on saline in the southern area of Bangladesh</article-title>. <source>Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare</source> <volume>4</volume> (<issue>22</issue>), <fpage>58</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>61</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B113">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rahman</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Penny</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mondal</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zaman</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kryston</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Salehin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Salinization in large river deltas: Drivers, impacts and socio-hydrological feedbacks</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Water security</source>, vol. <volume>6</volume>. (<publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>), <fpage>100024</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.wasec.2019.100024</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B114">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ralston</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Geyer</surname> <given-names>W. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lerczal</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Subtidal salinity and velocity in the Hudson river estuary: Observations and modeling</article-title>. <source>J. Phys. Oceanogr.</source> <volume>38</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>753</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>770</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1175/2007JPO3808.1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B115">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Roberts</surname> <given-names>H. H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weimer</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Slatt</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <source>River deltas, regional geology and tectonics</source> (<publisher-name>Elsevier B.V</publisher-name>), <fpage>490</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>511</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-444-53042-4.00017-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B116">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>S&#xe1;mano</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barcena</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garcia</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gomez</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alvarez</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Revilla</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Flushing time as a descriptor for heavily modified water bodies classification and management: Application to the huelva harbour</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Manage.</source> <volume>107</volume>, <fpage>37</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>44</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.04.022</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B117">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sarwar</surname> <given-names>M. G. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <source>Impacts of Sea level rise on the coastal zone of Bangladesh</source> (<publisher-name>(Masters Programme in environmental science</publisher-name>). <publisher-loc>(Sweden: Lund University)</publisher-loc>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B118">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Savenije</surname> <given-names>H. H. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Predictive model for salt intrusion in estuaries</article-title>. <source>J. Hydrol.</source> <volume>148</volume> (<issue>1&#x2013;4</issue>), <fpage>203</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>218</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0022-1694(93)90260-G</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B119">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Savenije</surname> <given-names>H. H. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <source>Salinity and tides in alluvial estuaries</source> (<publisher-name>Delft University of Technology</publisher-name>), <fpage>8</fpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B120">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schiller</surname> <given-names>R. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kourafalou</surname> <given-names>V. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hogan</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>N. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>The dynamics of the mississippi river plume: Impact of topography, wind and offshore forcing on the fate of plume waters</article-title>. <source>J. Geophysical Research: Oceans</source> <volume>116</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>22</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2010JC006883</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B121">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schubel</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Managing freshwater discharge to the San Francisco Bay/ Sacramento San Joaquin delta estuary the scientific basis for an estuarine standard</article-title>. In <source>Conclusions and recommendations of members of the scientific,policy, and management communities of the bay/delta estuary</source>. <publisher-name>United States Environmental Protection Agency</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B122">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shaha</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cho</surname> <given-names>Y. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>T. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Valle-Levinson</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Spatio-temporal variation of flushing time in the sumjin river estuary</article-title>. <source>Terrestrial Atmos. Ocean. Sci.</source> <volume>23</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>119</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>130</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3319/TAO.2011.08.22.01(Hy</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B123">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shaw</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mohrig</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Whitman</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>The morphology and evolution of channels on the wax lake delta, Louisiana, USA</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res.: Earth Surf.</source> <volume>118</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>1562</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1584</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jgrf.20123</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B124">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sheldon</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alber</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>The calculation of estuarine turnover times using freshwater fraction and tidal prism models: A critical evaluation</article-title>. <source>Estuaries Coasts</source> <volume>29</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>133</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>146</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02784705</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B125">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sheldon</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alber</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>A comparison of residence time calculations using simple compartment models of the altamaha river estuary, georgia</article-title>. <source>Estuaries</source> <volume>25</volume> (<issue>68</issue>), <fpage>1304</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1317</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B126">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sherin</surname> <given-names>V. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Recent salinity intrusion in the Bengal delta: Observations and possible causes</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Continental shelf research</source>, vol. <volume>202</volume>. (<publisher-name>Elsevier Ltd</publisher-name>), <fpage>104142</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.csr.2020.104142</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B127">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sitharam</surname> <given-names>T. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>S. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Falconer</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sivakumar</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kolathayar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <source>Sustainable water resource development using coastal reservoirs</source>. <publisher-name>Matthew Deans Butterworth-Heinemann</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B128">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Smedema</surname> <given-names>L. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shiati</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Irrigation and salinity: A perspective review of the salinity hazards of irrigation development in the arid zone</article-title>. <source>Irrig. Drain. Syst.</source> <volume>16</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>161</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>174</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1016008417327</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B129">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Spicer</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cole</surname> <given-names>K. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huguenard</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>MacDonald</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Whitney</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Wind effects on near- and midfield mixing in tidally pulsed river plumes</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans</source> <volume>127</volume>, <elocation-id>e2022JC018462</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2022JC018462</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B130">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sridevi</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sarma</surname> <given-names>V. V. S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Murty</surname> <given-names>T. V. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sadhuram</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reddym</surname> <given-names>N. P. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vijayakumar</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Variability in stratification and flushing times of the gautami&#x2013;godavari estuary, India</article-title>. <source>J. Earth Syst. Sci.</source> <volume>124</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>993</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1003</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12040-015-0594-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B131">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Vertical water renewal in a large estuary and implications for water quality</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>710</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135593</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B132">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tabarestani</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fouladfar</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Numerical modeling of salinity changes in the desalination stage of a coastal reservoir</article-title>. <source>J. Hydraul</source> <volume>16</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>69</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>83</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.30482/JHYD.2021.281280.152110.30482/JHYD.2021.281280.1521</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B133">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Trieu</surname> <given-names>T. T. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Phong</surname> <given-names>N. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>The impact of climate change on salinity intrusion and pangasius (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) farming in the Mekong delta, Vietnam</article-title>. <source>Aquacult. Int.</source> <volume>23</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>523</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>534</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10499-014-9833-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B134">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Uddin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haque</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Salinity response in southwest coastal region of Bangladesh due to hydraulic and hydrologic parameters</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Sustain. Agric. Technol.</source> <volume>6</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B135">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Uncles</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stephens</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Salt intrusion in the Tweed estuary</article-title>. <source>Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci.</source> <volume>43</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>271</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>293</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/ecss.1996.0070</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B136">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Valle-Levinson</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Effects of sill processes and tidal forcing on exchange in eastern long island sound</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res.</source> <volume>99</volume> (<issue>C6</issue>), <fpage>12667</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12681</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/94jc00721</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B137">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Viglione</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Merz</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dung</surname> <given-names>N. V. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parajka</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nester</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bloschl</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Attribution of regional flood changes based on scaling fingerprints</article-title>. <source>Water Resour. Res.</source> <volume>52</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>5322</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5340</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/2016WR019036</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B138">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Visser</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Day</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Battaglia</surname> <given-names>L. L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shaffer</surname> <given-names>G. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hester</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Mississippi River Delta Wetlands</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>book:Wetland Habitats of North America Ecology and Conservation Concerns</source> Edition <edition>1st</edition>, ch.5. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Batzer</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baldwin</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> Editors. <publisher-name>University of California Press</publisher-name>, <fpage>63</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>74</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1525/9780520951419-007</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B139">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vogel</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yaindl</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walter</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Nonstationarity: flood magnification and recurrence reduction factors in the united states</article-title>. <source>J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc.</source> <volume>47</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>464</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>474</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1752-1688.2011.00541.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B140">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Krauss</surname> <given-names>K. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Noe</surname> <given-names>G. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stagg</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Swarzenski</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duberstein</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Modeling soil porewater salinity response to drought in tidal freshwater forested wetlands</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci.</source> <volume>125</volume> (<issue>2</issue>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2018JG004996</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B141">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schramkowski</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schuttelaars</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Salt dynamics in well-mixed estuaries: Importance of advection by tides</article-title>. <source>J. Phys. Oceanogr.</source> <volume>46</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>1457</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1475</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1175/JPO-D-15-0045.1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B142">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schuttelaars</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Three-dimensional salt dynamics in well-mixed estuaries: Influence of estuarine convergence, Coriolis and bathymetry</article-title>. <source>J. Phys. Oceanogr.</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>1843</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1871</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1175/JPO-D-16-0247.1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B143">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Weisberg</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Three kinds of idealization</article-title>. <source>J. Philosophy</source> <volume>104</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>639</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>659</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5840/jphil20071041240</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B144">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>B. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1986</year>). <article-title>Flushing time calculations for the upper waitemata harbour, new zealand</article-title>. <source>New Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res.</source> <volume>20</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>455</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>465</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00288330.1986.9516165</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B145">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>White</surname> <given-names>E. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meselhe</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reed</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Renfro</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Snider</surname> <given-names>N. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Mitigating the effects of sea-level rise on estuaries of the Mississippi delta plain using river diversions</article-title>. <source>Water</source> <volume>11</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>2028</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/w11102028</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B146">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wong</surname> <given-names>K. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>On the relationship between long-term salinity variations and river discharge in the middle reach of the delaware estuary</article-title>. <source>J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans</source> <volume>100</volume> (<issue>C10</issue>), <fpage>20,705</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20,713</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/95JC01406</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B147">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y. C. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ray</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khalil</surname> <given-names>A. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>W. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Estimation of flood damage functions for river basin planning: a case study in Bangladesh</article-title>. <source>Natural Hazards</source> <volume>75</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>2773</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2791</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11069-014-1459-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B148">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Avener</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Horner-Devine</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>A two-color optical method for determining layer thickness in two interacting buoyant plumes</article-title>. <source>Exp. .Fluids</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>235</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1245</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00348-010-0969-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B149">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>J. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Insights into the design and development of shanghai coastal reservoirs</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Sustainable water resource development using coastal reservoirs</source> (<publisher-name>Elsevier Inc</publisher-name>), <fpage>97</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>110</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/b978-0-12-818002-0.00006-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B150">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yue</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ouarda</surname> <given-names>T. B. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bobee</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Legendre</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bruneau</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Approach for describing statistical properties of flood hydrograph</article-title>. <source>J. Hydrol. Eng.</source> <volume>7</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>147</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>153</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2002)7:2(147</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B151">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zevenbergen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Adaptive delta management: a comparison between the Netherlands and Bangladesh delta program</article-title>. <source>Int. J. River Basin Manage. Taylor Francis</source> <volume>16</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>299</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>305</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/15715124.2018.1433185</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B152">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Delworth</surname> <given-names>T. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Robustness of anthropogenically forced decadal precipitation changes projected for the 21st century</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun</source>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-018-03611-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B153">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Savenije</surname> <given-names>H. H. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kong</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Analytical solution for salt intrusion in the Yangtze estuary, China</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Estuarine, coastal and shelf science</source>, vol. <volume>91</volume>. (<publisher-name>Elsevier Ltd</publisher-name>), <fpage>492</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>501</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecss.2010.11.008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B154">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>V. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>&#x2019;Evaluation of flood frequency under non-stationarity resulting from climate indices and reservoir indices in the East river basin, China</article-title>. <source>J. Hydrol.</source> <volume>527</volume>, <fpage>565</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>575</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.05.029</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B155">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Prospective scenarios of the saltwater intrusion in an estuary under climate change context using Bayesian neural networks</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment</source>, vol. <volume>31</volume>. (<publisher-loc>Berlin Heidelberg</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>), <fpage>981</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>991</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00477-017-1399-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B156">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zimmerman</surname> <given-names>J. T. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1976</year>). <article-title>Mixing and flushing of tidal embayments in the western dutch wadden sea part i: Distribution of salinity and calculation of mixing time scales</article-title>. <source>Netherlands J. Sea Res.</source> <volume>10</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>149</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>191</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0077-7579(76)90013-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>