<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Mar. Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Marine Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Mar. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">2296-7745</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmars.2024.1338832</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Marine Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Assessment of the potential effect of thermal effluents on CO<sub>2</sub> absorption in coastal waters</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ko</surname>
<given-names>Young Ho</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1262903"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>Tae-Wook</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1264411"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>OJEong Resilience Institute, Korea University</institution>, <addr-line>Seoul</addr-line>, <country>Republic of Korea</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University</institution>, <addr-line>Seoul</addr-line>, <country>Republic of Korea</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Khan M. G. Mostofa, Tianjin University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Amit Kumar, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, China</p>
<p>Maribel I. Garc&#xed;a-Ib&#xe1;&#xf1;ez, Spanish Institute of Oceanography (IEO), Spain</p>
<p>Alban Kuriqi, University of Lisbon, Portugal</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Tae-Wook Kim, <email xlink:href="mailto:kimtwk@korea.ac.kr">kimtwk@korea.ac.kr</email>
</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>29</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>11</volume>
<elocation-id>1338832</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>15</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>12</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2024 Ko and Kim</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Ko and Kim</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>In recent decades, the cooling water discharge (CWD) from thermoelectric power plants into coastal waters has increased. The higher temperatures at the discharge outlets can elevate the seawater partial pressure of carbon dioxide (<italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub>), potentially resulting in increased carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions or reduced CO<sub>2</sub> absorption. Using a comprehensive global power plant database, we evaluated the impact of CWD on surface water CO<sub>2</sub>. Our assessment suggests that CWD from coastal power plants has the potential to contribute to a decline in oceanic CO<sub>2</sub> uptake by 0.09&#x2013;0.69 Tg C yr<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (equivalent to 0.3&#x2013;2.5 Tg CO<sub>2</sub> yr<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>). This estimation considered solely the influence of air&#x2013;sea CO<sub>2</sub> exchange, excluding the impact of air&#x2013;sea heat exchange following cooling water discharge. Therefore, our estimate of 0.09&#x2013;0.69 Tg C yr<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> is likely an upper theoretical limit. While our estimate appears minor in relation to global estimates of the oceanic CO<sub>2</sub> flux, this impact of CWD should be addressed on a national scale. For precise quantification of the impact of CWD on local air&#x2013;sea CO<sub>2</sub> flux, accurate information on environmental factors such as wind speeds, mixed layer depth, and background carbonate chemistry is essential.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>power plant</kwd>
<kwd>thermal discharge</kwd>
<kwd>coastal ocean</kwd>
<kwd>pCO2</kwd>
<kwd>air-sea CO2 flux</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="4"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="41"/>
<page-count count="9"/>
<word-count count="5190"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Marine Biogeochemistry</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>In line with the goal of the Paris Agreement objective to limit the increase in the global temperature to 1.5&#x2013;2.0&#xb0;C above pre-industrial levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Hoegh-Guldberg et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>), the sequestration of anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub> in the ocean, accounting for 26% of emissions over the last decade, is crucial for climate change mitigation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Friedlingstein et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). The rise in the global ocean temperature attributed to anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub> production has reduced oceanic CO<sub>2</sub> uptake through air&#x2013;sea gas exchange and strengthened water stratification, which could weaken the oceanic biophysical CO<sub>2</sub> pumps. More than 30% of the total anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub> emissions are linked to electricity generation from fossil fuels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">IEA, 2019</xref>). According to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), fossil-fuel-based electricity generation increased from 5,589 TWh to 16,833 TWh between 1980 and 2021 (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.eia.gov/international/overview/world">https://www.eia.gov/international/overview/world</ext-link>; lastly accessed on 2 January 2024).</p>
<p>The global air&#x2013;sea CO<sub>2</sub> flux has been estimated using large datasets of surface CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure (<italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub>) for open and coastal oceans (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Landsch&#xfc;tzer et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Laruelle et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). This flux varies over time and space depending on hydrographic conditions, biological processes, and air&#x2013;sea interactions. Sea surface temperature (SST) is particularly critical in calculating the air&#x2013;sea CO<sub>2</sub> flux from surface <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> observations. It is generally established that thermal and non-thermal upper-ocean factors can be used to identify seasonal fluctuations in the surface <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub>, based on the thermodynamic relationship between seawater <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> and temperature (e.g., 4.23% &#xb0;C<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Takahashi et&#xa0;al., 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Takahashi et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>). This relationship includes the impact of temperature on the solubility of CO<sub>2</sub> and the dissociation constants of carbonic acid in seawater. The air&#x2013;sea CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes largely depend on CO<sub>2</sub> gas solubility (related to SST), the gas transfer velocity (related to wind speed), and the relative difference between the atmospheric and seawater <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub>. Moreover, both in open and coastal oceans, a general latitudinal trend, with carbon sinks in high latitudes and carbon sources in the tropics, highlights the effect of the SST on <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Roobaert et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>In coastal oceans, <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> variability remains highly uncertain due to the data sparsity and the complexity of physical and biogeochemical processes, including riverine discharge of carbon and nutrients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chen &amp; Borges, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Cai et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Upadhyay et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Another concern is the discharge of anthropogenic thermal energy into water bodies via the cooling water used to remove excess heat from coal, gas, oil, and nuclear power plants. Indeed, the availability of cooling water is an essential factor in site selection for thermal plants, meaning that 55.5% and 33.4% of the thermal power plants worldwide are located within 5&#xa0;km of large rivers and 20&#xa0;km of coastlines, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Lohrmann et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). The regional impact of the discharge of heated water in the form of a dramatic increase in the SST has been reported at different locations in coastal oceans (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Madden et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Huang et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Lin et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). This thermal effect reduces the ocean&#x2019;s ability to absorb atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> due to an increase in positive &#x394;<italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> (i.e., seawater <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> minus atmospheric <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub>) in source regions and a decrease in negative &#x394;<italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> in sink regions. However, the increase in <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> due to cooling water discharge (CWD) from power plants has not yet been systematically documented in coastal oceans. This additional perturbation of <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> with local biological and physical activity may lead to greater regional variation in surface carbonate parameters and the CO<sub>2</sub> flux in estuaries and coastal oceans. Furthermore, an increasing number of thermal power plants are being built in coastal areas due to the vulnerability of freshwater sources such as rivers and lakes to drought and extreme heat (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">van Vliet et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). Consequently, these regions represent a significant source of uncertainty in regional estimates of the air&#x2013;sea CO<sub>2</sub> flux due to high spatiotemporal <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> variability.</p>
<p>In the present study, we investigated the effect of CWD on the air&#x2013;sea CO<sub>2</sub> flux using data from power plants worldwide. Initially, we first estimated the water use intensity (km<sup>3</sup> TWh<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) for power plants based on the relationship between the CWD and electricity generation using a local dataset from South Korea since key information, such as the cooling water temperature, is not widely available. The amount of CWD in coastal areas globally was then calculated based on the total electricity generation and our estimate of the water use intensity. We then compared our estimates of the water use intensity and CWD with those calculated in past studies from various estimates and datasets. Following this, we approximated the impact of the CWD on the decrease in the atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> uptake of coastal oceans, which varies depending on the background air&#x2013;sea CO<sub>2</sub> gradients, wind speeds, and mixed layer depth. We used global datasets for seawater total dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and total alkalinity (TA) to evaluate global and regional thermal-driven changes in <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> and DIC and compared them with regional carbon fluxes in coastal areas.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<p>We extracted data for various power plant variables, including fuel type, capacity, and electricity generation, from the Global Power Plant Database V1.3.0 (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://datasets.wri.org/dataset/globalpowerplantdatabase">https://datasets.wri.org/dataset/globalpowerplantdatabase</ext-link>; last updated in June 2021). The database covers about 35,000 coal, gas, oil, and nuclear power plants from 167 countries and includes the geolocation of each power plant for 2017. The annual electricity generation for coastal areas was calculated for power plants within ~20 km of the coastline. It is posited that power plants within this range utilize seawater for cooling purposes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Lohrmann et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). We assumed that these coastal power plants employ a once-through cooling system drawing water from a large water body such as the ocean or a river.</p>
<p>We estimated the amount of cooling water reaching the coastal ocean by multiplying the electricity generation by the water use intensity (e.g., km<sup>3</sup> TWh<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) derived from monthly data from South Korea. South Korea ranked as the ninth-largest energy consumer globally in 2019 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Looney, 2020</xref>) and produced 512 TWh of electricity in coastal areas, constituting ~7% of global coastal electricity generation in 2017. The electricity generation in South Korea comprised ~69% from fossil fuel sources and around ~25% from nuclear power sources (EIA&#x2019;s Country Analysis Brief: South Korea; available at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.eia.gov/international/analysis/country/KOR">https://www.eia.gov/international/analysis/country/KOR</ext-link>; lastly accessed on 2 January 2024). Monthly data for once-through cooling systems, including the electricity generation, CWD, inlet temperature, and outflow temperature, are taken from Korea Electric Power Company and Korea Hydro &amp; Nuclear Power (KHNP). The data for nuclear power plants is restricted to research purposes and obtained from KHNP, whereas the majority of data for fossil fuel plants is publicly accessible at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.data.go.kr/">https://www.data.go.kr/</ext-link> (lastly accessed on 2 January 2024). These data were compiled from 22 coal, gas, and oil power plants and 5 nuclear power plants, collectively accounting for ~59% of the total electricity generation between 2018 and 2020. These power plants are located in coastal areas and use seawater as a source of cooling water.</p>
<p>The coastal ocean data for 2017, including temperature, salinity, DIC, TA, and <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub>, were obtained from a global 1&#xb0;&#xd7;1&#xb0; gridded product (OceanSODA-ETHZ; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Gregor &amp; Gruber, 2021</xref>). Following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Laruelle et&#xa0;al. (2017)</xref>, our study area was defined as coastal regions within 300&#xa0;km from coastlines or a depth of 1000&#xa0;m (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Daily air&#x2013;sea CO<sub>2</sub> flux (<italic>F</italic>CO<italic>
<sub>2</sub>
</italic>) was estimated using the procedure described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Wanninkhof (2014)</xref>. The equation of <italic>F</italic>CO<italic>
<sub>2</sub>
</italic> = <italic>k</italic> &#xd7; &#x3b1; &#xd7; &#x394;<italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> was used, where <italic>k</italic> is the CO<sub>2</sub> gas transfer velocity, &#x3b1; is the CO<sub>2</sub> solubility in seawater (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Weiss, 1974</xref>), and &#x394;<italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> is the air&#x2013;sea <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> difference (seawater <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> &#x2013; atmospheric <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub>). <italic>k</italic> was defined as <italic>k</italic> = 0.251 &#xd7; (Sc/660)<sup>&#x2212;1/2</sup> &#xd7; U<sup>2</sup>, where Sc is the Schmidt number and U is wind speed (m s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Wanninkhof, 2014</xref>). Wind speed data (at 10&#xa0;m) was obtained from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction-Department of Energy (NCEP-DOE) Reanalysis 2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Kanamitsu et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Global distribution of thermoelectric power plants and their electricity generation (green circles) within 20&#xa0;km of the coastline. The color bar indicates the annual mean difference between seawater and atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressure (&#x394;<italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub>: seawater <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> &#x2013; atmospheric <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub>) of the study region. An atmospheric <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> of 407 &#x3bc;atm is used, which is the 2017 average from flask analysis data collected at Mauna Loa, USA (19.54&#xb0;N, 155.58&#xb0;W) and obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)/Global Monitoring Laboratory (<uri xlink:href="https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/">https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/</uri>; lastly accessed on 2 January 2024). The inset shows the latitudinal distribution of the annual electricity generation (TWh) of the coastal thermoelectric power plants.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-11-1338832-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The deficits in the DIC resulting from degassing via air&#x2013;sea CO<sub>2</sub> gas exchange depends on the Revelle factor (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Revelle &amp; Suess, 1957</xref>), which represents the fractional change in surface seawater CO<sub>2</sub> (&#x394;<italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub>/<italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub>) over the fractional change in the DIC (&#x394;DIC/DIC). The Revelle factor was calculated from the DIC and TA using the carbonic acid dissociation constants defined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Millero (2010)</xref>. The sensitivity of oceanic DIC to an increase in <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> was assessed using the inverse of the Revelle factor, which varies regionally between oceans.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Estimates of cooling water discharge from global coastal power plants</title>
<p>The total electricity generation worldwide estimated from the dataset with geolocation information was 19,163 TWh in 2017, which is 78.6% of the 24,394 TWh reported in the database provided by the EIA (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.eia.gov/international/overview/world">https://www.eia.gov/international/overview/world</ext-link>; lastly accessed on 2 January 2024). This discrepancy may arise from the scarcity of geolocation data for wind and solar power plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Byers et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). On the other hand, geolocation data for conventional thermal power plants are more widely available (~100%). The electric generation within 20&#xa0;km of the coastline (6,838 TWh) accounts for 35.7% of the total electric generation. Regional electric generation differs notably between latitudinal bands (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). In particular, along the coastline, 28.1% and 37.9% of worldwide electricity generation are observed in the 20&#xb0;N&#x2013;30&#xb0;N and 30&#xb0;N&#x2013;40&#xb0;N latitude bands, respectively.</p>
<p>The water use intensity and thermal efficiency vary seasonally depending on the difference in temperature between the internal heat source and the external environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">De La Guardia et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). In South Korea, the outlet temperature exhibited seasonal variations, ranging from 0 to 15&#xb0;C higher than the inlet temperature, with an average difference of 6.6&#xb0;C between 2018 and 2020 (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). To the best of our knowledge, there is no publicly available data for the temperature information, including the temperature of the source water and the difference between the inlet and outlet of the cooling water, that can be applied to global estimates. Therefore, the water use intensity was calculated based on the CWD and electricity generation using monthly data from 22 fossil fuel and 5 nuclear power plants in South Korea. An annual electricity generation of 375 TWh and a CWD of 58.5 km<sup>3</sup> has been reported from 2018 to 2020, from which the corresponding water use intensity was estimated to be 0.156 km<sup>3</sup> TWh<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, which is consistent with the range reported in previous regional studies (0.136&#x2013;0.207 km<sup>3</sup> TWh<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) for once-through cooling systems in fossil fuel and nuclear power plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Peer &amp; Sanders, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Pan et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Lin et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">De La Guardia et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). The average water use intensity is 0.137 km<sup>3</sup> TWh<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> for fossil fuel power plants and 0.184 km<sup>3</sup> TWh<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> for nuclear power plants, which likely reflects the differences in the thermal efficiency between the two fuel sources (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Although individual nuclear and fossil fuel plants can vary widely in their&#xa0;efficiency, the average thermal efficiency of fossil fuel plants (40&#x2212;60%) is greater than that of nuclear plants (34&#x2212;36%) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Wibisono &amp; Shwageraus, 2016</xref>). As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>, coal plants in South Korea also have higher thermal efficiency and require less cooling water than nuclear power plants.</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Monthly cooling water discharge (km<sup>3</sup>) versus monthly electric generation (TWh) for 22 fossil (black circles) and 5 nuclear (yellow circles) power plants in South Korea. The water use intensity is estimated to be 0.156 km<sup>3</sup> TWh<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (solid line), which is consistent with the range reported by previous regional studies (0.136&#x2013;0.207 km<sup>3</sup> TWh<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>; dashed lines) for once-through cooling systems in fossil fuel and nuclear power plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Peer &amp; Sanders, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Pan et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Lin et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">De La Guardia et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). The inset shows the locations and annual electricity generation (TWh) for power plants in South Korea obtained from the Global Power Plant Database V1.3.0 (<uri xlink:href="https://datasets.wri.org/dataset/globalpowerplantdatabase">https://datasets.wri.org/dataset/globalpowerplantdatabase</uri>; lastly accessed on 2 January 2024).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-11-1338832-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The global CWD was then calculated using annual electric generation (6,838 TWh) for coastal areas and the water use intensity estimated from the South Korea data (0.156 km<sup>3</sup> TWh<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>). Overall, 1,066 km<sup>3</sup> of cooling water was estimated to be discharged yearly, which is comparable to the global wastewater discharge (~1,000 km<sup>3</sup>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Lu et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>) and the discharge from Changjiang River (900 km<sup>3</sup>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). However, our estimate is three times higher than the reported seawater withdrawal rate (300 km<sup>3</sup>) for coastal areas based on satellite imagery (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Lohrmann et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). One reason for this difference could be that we assume that only once-through cooling systems are used in coastal areas, which can result in the overestimation of the CWD due to the higher water use intensity of once-through cooling systems compared to other cooling technologies (e.g., recirculating cooling towers and dry cooling systems). Another possible explanation is that estuaries are often found close to large rivers and oceans, which can be an important source of fresh (or brackish) water for cooling; however, our estimates did not take into account freshwater use. Despite this, it should be noted that once-though cooling systems are the most common cooling technology for the power plants built along the coastline, and differences in CWD estimates are apparent in country-level comparisons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">De La Guardia et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>To verify our methodology for estimating the CWD, our CWD estimates for China, Japan, the United States, and South Korea were compared with those from previous research. Our estimates for the CWD are 222.3, 138.7, 109.0, and 79.8 km<sup>3</sup> for China, Japan, the United States, and South Korea, respectively, which are higher than the 14.4, 29.4, 1.8, and 28.6 km<sup>3</sup> reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Lohrmann et&#xa0;al. (2019)</xref>. However, previously reported seawater withdrawal volumes of 108&#x2013;201 km<sup>3</sup> for China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Lin et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>) are comparable to our estimates. The seawater withdrawal data reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Zhang et&#xa0;al. (2016)</xref> for China in 2011 was approximately scaled for 2017 based on the annual electric generation of China between 2011 and 2017. In addition, for the United States, the reported seawater withdrawal of 31.8&#x2013;42.8 km<sup>3</sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Harris &amp; Diehl, 2019</xref>) is 29&#x2013;39% of our estimates. The variation in the estimates for different countries can be attributed to the relative proportion of freshwater- and seawater-based cooling systems in coastal areas. Nevertheless, the order of magnitude difference in the estimated CWD at the country and regional level suggests that additional assessments are needed using a more extensive database for CWD based on estimates from various methods.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Change in <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> and the oceanic uptake of CO<sub>2</sub> due to CWD</title>
<p>When a specific power generation capacity is given, the temperature difference (&#x394;T) between the inlet and outlet is inversely proportional to the amount of CWD. Therefore, this study utilized the &#x394;T of ~6.6&#xb0;C, corresponding to the water use intensity (0.156 km<sup>3</sup> TWh<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>). This &#x394;T was estimated to lead to a variation of 70&#x2013;170 &#x3bc;atm in <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub>, which is comparable to the seasonal variation in <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> observed for the temperate open ocean (&lt;90 &#x3bc;atm; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Takahashi et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). To examine the potential impact of the CWD on the absorption of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>, we calculated the rise in the <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> of the discharged water and the change in the DIC (&#x394;DIC) resulting from perturbations in the air&#x2013;sea CO<sub>2</sub> flux. It should be noted that the calculation for assessing the &#x394;DIC was conducted using <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub>&#x2013;TA pairs, and a coefficient (&#x2202;ln <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub>/&#x2202;SST) of 0.0423&#xb0;C<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Takahashi et&#xa0;al., 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Takahashi et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>) was not directly applied. This is because the influence of temperature on <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> exhibited values different from 0.0423&#xb0;C<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, especially under low-temperature or salinity conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Jiang et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Calleja et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Gallego et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>The upper limit of the &#x394;DIC was calculated assuming that the elevated <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> returns to the original condition through the air&#x2013;sea CO<sub>2</sub> exchange without considering further biophysical processes. It was also assumed that the relaxation back to initial conditions would occur independent of oceanic and meteorological variables. The meridional variation in the &#x394;DIC indicates that warm and salty waters in the subtropics (&#x2212;57 &#xb1; 3 &#x3bc;mol kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) are more sensitive to <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> perturbations compared to cold polar waters with low salinity (&#x2212;47 &#xb1; 6 &#x3bc;mol kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref>). For initially oversaturated seawater with respect to the atmosphere, a negative value of the &#x394;DIC represents the expected value from the greater release of CO<sub>2</sub> due to warming. Thus, a negative value for the &#x394;DIC for initial and post-discharge undersaturated seawater represents the probable decline in CO<sub>2</sub> uptake potential. Based on the expected &#x394;DIC and the relative contribution of CWD in each latitudinal band, we evaluated the impact of CWD on the average surface DIC (&#x394;DIC = &#x2212;55 &#xb1; 4 &#x3bc;mol kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) in global coastal waters. Overall, the estimated warming caused by CWD (1,066 km<sup>3</sup>) could potentially lead to a reduction in the oceanic CO<sub>2</sub> uptake of 0.69 Tg C yr<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (~2.5 Tg CO<sub>2</sub> yr<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(A)</bold> Potential decrease in the total dissolved inorganic carbon (&#x394;DIC) of discharged cooling water. It represents the relaxation of the elevated <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> to original conditions solely through air&#x2013;sea CO<sub>2</sub> exchange, without accounting for other physical factors like mixed layer depth and warming period. Please note that the x-axis is reversed. Plots of &#x394;DIC and salinity are overlaid with the <bold>(B)</bold> SST and <bold>(C)</bold> Revelle factor. The red line in <bold>(B, C)</bold> represents the expected &#x394;DIC value resulting from a discharge of the assumed source water. The total alkalinity (TA) of the source water was calculated using the linear TA&#x2013;salinity relationship (TA = 50.43&#xd7;salinity + 548.7), which was derived from monthly TA and salinity data for coastal oceans (OceanSODA-ETHZ; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Gregor &amp; Gruber, 2021</xref>). It was assumed that the source water for cooling is initially equilibrated with atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-11-1338832-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The effect of seawater <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> perturbation depends on how rapidly the perturbed seawater is restored to its initial state in terms of <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> and the SST. Thermal discharge to a net CO<sub>2</sub> source area would quickly lead to a return to the initial <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> due to the enhanced sea-to-air CO<sub>2</sub> flux (i.e., outgassing). The thermal stratification and surface residence time associated with the seasonal SST cycle can also regulate the response of discharged water. When air&#x2013;sea heat exchange (with heat loss reducing oceanic <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> in accordance with &#x2202;ln <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub>/&#x2202;SST = 0.027&#x2013;0.0423&#xb0;C<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) is faster than air&#x2013;sea CO<sub>2</sub> exchange, the <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> of cooling water would recover quickly. In this case, the DIC deficit of the thermal plume would be smaller than that expected solely from CO<sub>2</sub> outgassing. Therefore, our estimate of ~0.69 Tg C yr<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> is likely to represent an upper theoretical limit based on the current data.</p>
<p>In addition to the upper limit estimation, we calculated &#x394;DIC while considering varying gas exchange rates to investigate the realistic response of discharged water associated with instantaneous warming at different wind speeds and air&#x2013;sea CO<sub>2</sub> gradients. In the actual environment, discharged cooling water is mixed with surrounding (source) waters. Assuming a 10-fold dilution (leading to the &#x394;T of 0.66&#xb0;C), the &#x394;DIC is proportionally reduced to a factor of one-tenth. Since it is challenging to observe the dilution signal with the gridded product used in this study, the assumption of one-tenth dilution was made with the expectation that &#x394;DIC aligns with a level comparable with accuracy and precision ( &#xb1; 2&#x2013;3 &#x3bc;mol kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) of the DIC measurement (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). It should be noted that taking into account the dilution factor, the overall change in DIC of CWD remains relatively consistent. Initially, we calculated the &#x394;DIC of the source water associated with the air&#x2013;sea CO<sub>2</sub> gas exchange using its original condition, which corresponds to an initial <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> ranging from 257 to 557 &#x3bc;atm, and the average value of TA of 2248 &#x3bc;mol kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, S = 33.7, and T = 17.1&#xb0;C of the coastal ocean datasets (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Subsequently, we calculated the &#x394;DIC for the cooling water, assuming a 10-fold dilution, resulting in a temperature increase of 0.66&#xb0;C. The difference in &#x394;DIC between source water and cooling water represents the impact of temperature elevation on air&#x2013;sea CO<sub>2</sub> exchange and the DIC inventory.</p>
<p>These calculations of the realistic response of carbonate parameters associated with instantaneous warming were explicitly performed for the 6-month warming period (spring to summer) when SST increased. It was assumed that the sea-to-air heat flux was minimized during this period. Considering the average wind speed of 4&#xa0;m s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> between 30&#x2013;40&#xb0;N of our study region and an assumed mixed layer depth of 15&#xa0;m, the final DIC concentration of discharged cooling water was ~27 &#x3bc;mol kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> lower than that of source water (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4B</bold>
</xref>). This decrease in DIC is primarily attributed to the enhanced CO<sub>2</sub> outgassing or weakened CO<sub>2</sub> uptake depending on the air&#x2013;sea CO<sub>2</sub> gradient (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;2C</bold>
</xref>). The magnitude of the &#x394;DIC is ~49% of our upper limit of ~55 &#xb1; 4 &#x3bc;mol kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> expected from the complete relaxation of <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> perturbation. Since only a 6-month period was considered, the &#x394;DIC was applied to half of the annual discharged water volume. Additionally, taking into account the average duration of the discharged water during the warming period, the CWD can potentially impact the surrounding water for approximately 3 months. Overall, it was estimated that the upper limit (~0.69 Tg C yr<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) of the impact of CWD has reduced to ~13% of its original magnitude (~0.09 Tg C yr<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(A)</bold> The change in total dissolved inorganic carbon (&#x394;DIC) for both source water (dashed line) and the cooling water (indicated by color-contour) resulting from air&#x2013;sea CO<sub>2</sub> exchange at a mixed layer depth of 15&#xa0;m over 6 months. The initial condition of source water corresponds to <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> values of 257&#x2013;557 &#x3bc;atm and the average value of TA = 2248 &#x3bc;mol kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, S = 33.7, and T = 17.1&#xb0;C. It was assumed that the cooling water is instantaneously diluted 10-fold after being discharged, resulting in a temperature increase of 0.66&#xb0;C. <bold>(B)</bold> The difference in DIC concentration (cooling water &#x2013; source water) represents the effect of the enhanced CO<sub>2</sub> outgassing or weakened CO<sub>2</sub> uptake, which varies based on the initial <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> levels. It is noted that &#x394;DIC in <bold>(B)</bold> is multiplied by a factor of 10 to account for the dilution.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fmars-11-1338832-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Our estimates are sensitive to variations in wind speed, mixed layer depth, and air&#x2013;sea CO<sub>2</sub> gradient. It is difficult to obtain precise environmental information for individual coastal areas. Furthermore, due to the non-linear response of the &#x394;DIC to variations in individual factors, our exploration has been limited to simple sensitivity information within a narrow range. Deviations in wind speed by 1&#xa0;m s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> from the assumed 4&#xa0;m s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> resulted in approximately 30% change in the magnitude of &#x394;DIC, indicating a positive correlation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4B</bold>
</xref>). Utilizing mixed layer depths of 10 and 20&#xa0;m led to a 20% increase and decrease in the magnitude of &#x394;DIC, respectively, compared to employing a mixed layer depth of 15&#xa0;m. The uncertainty associated with using gridded products to assess the biogeochemical properties of the complex coastal areas was challenging to quantify accurately. Instead, we conducted a sensitivity analysis using different air&#x2013;sea CO<sub>2</sub> gradients (seawater <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> &#x2013; atmospheric <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub>; &#x2212;150 to 150 &#x3bc;atm). The assumed &#x394;<italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> range of &#xb1;150 &#x3bc;atm corresponds to 3&#x3c3; ( &#xb1; 125 &#x3bc;atm) of the gridded <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> database and the seasonal amplitude of <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> measured at coastal areas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Torres et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). These variations of &#xb1;150 &#x3bc;atm contributed to an 11% difference in our &#x394;DIC estimate (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;2C</bold>
</xref>). The sensitivity of &#x394;DIC to variations in the <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> is also significantly influenced by the Revelle factor, which will be further discussed in the following section. Due to the significant variations in &#x394;DIC associated with each variable, accurate quantification requires precise measurement of CO<sub>2</sub> and environmental parameters.</p>
<p>The effect of the CWD-associated carbon flux is minor compared to that of other carbon fluxes, which are several orders of magnitude higher, in the global ocean. However, for regions with significant coastal thermal pollution, this impact should be taken into account during the assessment of the regional CO<sub>2</sub> budget, which includes the oceanic CO<sub>2</sub> flux with the atmosphere and terrestrial environment (via river runoff) on a national scale. For example, China, Japan, and South Korea contribute to 43.2% of global thermoelectric generation and subsequent CWD in coastal regions. In the coastal areas of China, a CWD of ~222.3 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> is produced by coal and nuclear power plants, which is ~25% of the discharge from Changjiang River (~900 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), while a CWD of 79.8 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> estimated for South Korea is greater than the discharge from its five main rivers (~43 km<sup>3</sup> yr<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Lee E. et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Of the carbon fluxes in the coastal areas of South Korea, our upper estimate for the potential decrease in the CO<sub>2</sub> influx (~58 Gg C yr<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) is comparable to the amount of organic carbon sequestrated by a tidal flat (~71 Gg C yr<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Lee et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>) and ~10% of the DIC release from the five main rivers (~450 Gg C yr<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Lee E. et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Our estimate (~58 Gg C yr<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) could decrease to ~13% when considering other physical factors such as a mixed layer depth and warming period. Globally, the estimated &#x394;DIC due to CWD (0.09&#x2013;0.69 Tg C yr<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) is relatively minor (&lt;11%) compared to the carbon sequestration rate of the top sediment (6.8 Tg C yr<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chen &amp; Lee, 2022</xref>) in global tidal flats (127,921 km<sup>2</sup>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>The sensitivity of DIC to <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> variation</title>
<p>Currently, available data for physical factors (e.g., hydrodynamics, mixed layer depth, and air&#x2013;sea heat flux) are insufficient for the accurate estimation of the gas exchange timescale for the restoration of perturbed oceanic CO<sub>2</sub>. Given the difficulty in modeling the relatively slow process of gas exchange (i.e., over weeks to months) for the CO<sub>2</sub>, we focus on variation and heterogeneity in coastal systems with a variety of salinity and carbonate parameters. This analysis can serve as a roadmap for future attempts to measure the impact of the CWD on more specific regions (e.g., estuaries).</p>
<p>Buffer factors determine the relative sensitivity of carbon parameters (e.g., <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub>, DIC, pH, and calcium carbonate saturation state) to perturbations from normal conditions. Because we assessed the potential impact of the CWD-induced change in <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub>, the associated &#x394;DIC is proportional to the inverse of the conventional buffer factor (i.e., the sensitivity of <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> to changes in the DIC) and varied regionally. In coastal oceans, the TA is generally higher than the DIC, with a DIC/TA ratio ranging from 0.82 to 1.02. The lowest DIC/TA ratios are observed in the warm subtropical regions with the most robust buffering capacity (Revelle factor of ~8). The lowest buffering capacity (Revelle factor of ~17) is observed in subpolar regions, where the DIC/TA ratio approaches unity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>Near-shore areas and estuaries are generally known as net sources of CO<sub>2</sub> emitted to the atmosphere due to the microbial oxidation of organic carbon and the input of poorly buffered freshwater (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chen &amp; Borges, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Cai et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Due to the lower buffering capacities (i.e., a higher Revelle factor) in estuarine and low-salinity coastal waters, a fractional change in <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> results in a weaker fractional change in the DIC compared with seawater. As the salinity approaches zero, the decrease in the DIC concentration with a lower buffer factor reduces the &#x394;DIC associated with CWD (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). However, when the riverine TA is high (&gt; 1,800 &#x3bc;mol kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) with a strong buffering capacity even within a lower salinity range (e.g., the Mississippi River and Changjiang River; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Cai et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>), &#x394;DIC may exceed than expected value from the &#x394;DIC/salinity trend derived from the endmember (TA = ~548 &#x3bc;mol kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> at zero salinity) obtained from coastal ocean dataset (OceanSODA-ETHZ; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Gregor &amp; Gruber, 2021</xref>). Additionally, the &#x394;DIC/salinity trend can be significantly disrupted when freshwater mixes with seawater due to changes in biological production. Enhanced biological production, for example, can lead to an increase in buffer capacity. Consequently, it is essential to assess regional variations in the sensitivity to thermal stress to comprehensively evaluate the physical effect of thermal discharge on CO<sub>2</sub> dynamics.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>4</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>To the best of our knowledge, no previous study has attempted to estimate coastal ocean <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> anomalies caused by thermal discharge on a global scale. In this study, we assessed the upper limits of the variation in the DIC content of CWD associated with the reduction of the air-to-sea CO<sub>2</sub> flux in coastal oceans worldwide. Globally, the potential decrease in the CO<sub>2</sub> uptake was estimated to be 0.09&#x2013;0.69 Tg C yr<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> due to the warming-induced increase in oceanic <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub>. However, these preliminary assessments are constrained by the use of coarse-gridded CO<sub>2</sub> datasets and the omission of air&#x2013;sea heat exchange. It is crucial to accurately classify the cooling type of coastal power plants and thoroughly evaluate the discharged water volume and temperature. Additionally, a higher spatial resolution carbon database, coupled with environmental factors like wind speed and mixed layer depth&#xa0;affecting the air&#x2013;sea interaction of discharged seawater, is&#xa0;required. Integrating additional information from observations and models collectively contributes to understanding the duration&#xa0;and magnitude of <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> perturbations associated with&#xa0;CWD, considering their diverse characteristics in various coastal environments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data&#xa0;can be found here: <uri xlink:href="https://datasets.wri.org/dataset/globalpowerplantdatabase">https://datasets.wri.org/dataset/globalpowerplantdatabase</uri> <uri xlink:href="https://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.ncep.reanalysis2.html">https://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.ncep.reanalysis2.html</uri> <uri xlink:href="https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/13/777/2021/">https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/13/777/2021/</uri>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>YK: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Methodology. TK: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (2021R1C1C2009977 and 2019R1A2C2089994).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2024.1338832/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2024.1338832/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_1.pdf" id="SM1" mimetype="application/pdf"/>
</sec>
<fn-group>
<title>Abbreviations</title>
<fn fn-type="abbr">
<p>&#x3b1;, CO<sub>2</sub> solubility in seawater; CO<sub>2</sub>, Carbon dioxide; CWD, Cooling water discharge; DIC, Total dissolved inorganic carbon; FCO<sub>2</sub>, Air&#x2013;sea CO<sub>2</sub> flux; <italic>k</italic>, CO<sub>2</sub> gas transfer velocity; <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub>, Partial pressure of CO<sub>2</sub> in seawater; Sc, Schmidt number; SST, Sea surface temperature; TA, Total alkalinity; U, Wind speed.</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Byers</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Friedrich</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hennig</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kressig</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McCormick</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>A global database of power plants</article-title>. <source>World Resour. Institute</source>. Available at: <uri xlink:href="https://www.wri.org/research/global-database-power-plants">https://www.wri.org/research/global-database-power-plants</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>W.-J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feely</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Testa</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Evans</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alin</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Natural and anthropogenic drivers of acidification in large estuaries</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci.</source> <volume>13</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>23</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>55</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-marine-010419-011004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>W.-J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y.-Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feely</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wanninkhof</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>J&#xf6;nsson</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alin</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Controls on surface water carbonate chemistry along North American ocean margins</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>11</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>2691</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-020-16530-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Calleja</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duarte</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>&#xc1;lvarez</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vaquer-Sunyer</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Agust&#xed;</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Herndl</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Prevalence of strong vertical CO2 and O2 variability in the top meters of the ocean</article-title>. <source>Global Biogeochem. Cycles</source> <volume>27</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>941</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>949</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/gbc.20081</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>C.-T. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Borges</surname> <given-names>A. V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Reconciling opposing views on carbon cycling in the coastal ocean: Continental shelves as sinks and near-shore ecosystems as sources of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub>
</article-title>. <source>Deep Sea Res. Part II: Topical Stud. Oceanogr.</source> <volume>56</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>578</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>590</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.dsr2.2009.01.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Z. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Tidal flats as a significant carbon reservoir in global coastal ecosystems</article-title>. <source>Front. Mar. Sci.</source> <volume>9</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmars.2022.900896</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>De La Guardia</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Regional and temporal variability in water use intensity for thermoelectric power plants in the contiguous United States</article-title>. <source>J.&#xa0;Clean. Prod.</source> <volume>378</volume>, <fpage>134604</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134604</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Friedlingstein</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>O&#x2019;Sullivan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Andrew</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gregor</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hauck</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Global carbon budget 2022</article-title>. <source>Earth System Sci. Data</source> <volume>14</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>4811</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4900</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gallego</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Timmermann</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Friedrich</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeebe</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Drivers of future seasonal cycle changes in oceanic <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub>
</article-title>. <source>Biogeosciences</source> <volume>15</volume> (<issue>17</issue>), <fpage>5315</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5327</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-15-5315-2018</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gregor</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gruber</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>OceanSODA-ETHZ: A global gridded data set of the surface ocean carbonate system for seasonal to decadal studies of ocean acidification</article-title>. <source>Earth System Sci. Data</source> <volume>13</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>777</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>808</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/essd-13-777-2021</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Harris</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Diehl</surname> <given-names>T. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <source>Withdrawal and consumption of water by thermoelectric power plants in the United States, 2015</source> (<publisher-loc>Reston, VA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>US Geological Survey</publisher-name>), <fpage>No. 2019</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5103</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hoegh-Guldberg</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jacob</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guill&#xe9;n Bola&#xf1;os</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bindi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The human imperative of stabilizing global climate change at 1.5&#xb0;C</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>365</volume> (<issue>6459</issue>), <elocation-id>eaaw6974</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aaw6974</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effects of thermal discharge from coastal nuclear power plants and thermal power plants on the thermocline characteristics in sea areas with different tidal dynamics</article-title>. <source>Water</source> <volume>11</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>2577</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/w11122577</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>IEA</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <source>Global Energy &amp; CO2 Status Report</source> Vol. <volume>2019</volume> (<publisher-loc>Paris</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>IEA</publisher-name>). Available at: <uri xlink:href="https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-co2-status-report-2019/">https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-co2-status-report-2019/</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>L.-Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>W.-J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>A comparative study of carbon dioxide degassing in river- and marine-dominated estuaries</article-title>. <source>Limnol. Oceanogr.</source> <volume>53</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>2603</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2615</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4319/lo.2008.53.6.2603</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kanamitsu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ebisuzaki</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Woollen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>S.-K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hnilo</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fiorino</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>NCEP&#x2013;DOE AMIP-II reanalysis (R-2)</article-title>. <source>Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc.</source> <volume>83</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>1631</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1644</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1175/BAMS-83-11-1631</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Landsch&#xfc;tzer</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gruber</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bakker</surname> <given-names>D. C. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Decadal variations and trends of the global ocean carbon sink</article-title>. <source>Global Biogeochem. Cycles</source> <volume>30</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>1396</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1417</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/2015GB005359</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Laruelle</surname> <given-names>G. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Landsch&#xfc;tzer</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gruber</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tison</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Delille</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Regnier</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Global high-resolution monthly <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub> climatology for the coastal ocean derived from neural network interpolation</article-title>. <source>Biogeosciences</source> <volume>14</volume> (<issue>19</issue>), <fpage>4545</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4561</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-14-4545-2017</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Noh</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kwon</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kwon</surname> <given-names>B.-O.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The first national scale evaluation of organic carbon stocks and sequestration rates of coastal sediments along the West Sea, South Sea, and East Sea of South Korea</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>793</volume>, <fpage>148568</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148568</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>E.-J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shin</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yoo</surname> <given-names>G.-Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ko</surname> <given-names>E.-B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Butman</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Raymond</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Loads and ages of carbon from the five largest rivers in South Korea under Asian monsoon climates</article-title>. <source>J. Hydrol.</source> <volume>599</volume>, <fpage>126363</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126363</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Quantitative estimation of sea surface temperature increases resulting from the thermal discharge of coastal power plants in China</article-title>. <source>Mar. pollut. Bull.</source> <volume>164</volume>, <fpage>112020</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112020</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lohrmann</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Farfan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Caldera</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lohrmann</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Breyer</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Global scenarios for significant water use reduction in thermal power plants based on cooling water demand estimation using satellite imagery</article-title>. <source>Nat. Energy</source> <volume>4</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>1040</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1048</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41560-019-0501-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Looney</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <source>Statistical review of world energy</source> Vol. <volume>69</volume> (<publisher-loc>London, UK</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>BP Statistics</publisher-name>). Available at: <uri xlink:href="https://www.bp.com">https://www.bp.com</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guest</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peters</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rau</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>Z. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Wastewater treatment for carbon capture and utilization</article-title>. <source>Nat. Sustain.</source> <volume>1</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>750</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>758</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41893-018-0187-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Madden</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lewis</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davis</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Thermal effluent from the power sector: an analysis of once-through cooling system impacts on surface water temperature</article-title>. <source>Environ. Res. Lett.</source> <volume>8</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <elocation-id>35006</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Millero</surname> <given-names>F. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Carbonate constants for estuarine waters</article-title>. <source>Mar. Freshw. Res.</source> <volume>61</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>139</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>142</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/MF09254</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>S.-Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Snyder</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Packman</surname> <given-names>A. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chiang</surname> <given-names>P.-C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Cooling water use in thermoelectric power generation and its associated challenges for addressing water-energy nexus</article-title>. <source>Water-Energy Nexus</source> <volume>1</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>26</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>41</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.wen.2018.04.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Peer</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sanders</surname> <given-names>K. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Characterizing cooling water source and usage patterns across US thermoelectric power plants: a comprehensive assessment of self-reported cooling water data</article-title>. <source>Environ. Res. Lett.</source> <volume>11</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>124030</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1748-9326/aa51d8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Revelle</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Suess</surname> <given-names>H. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1957</year>). <article-title>Carbon dioxide exchange between atmosphere and ocean and the question of an increase of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> during the past decades</article-title>. <source>Tellus</source> <volume>9</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>18</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>27</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.2153-3490.1957.tb01849.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Roobaert</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Laruelle</surname> <given-names>G. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Landsch&#xfc;tzer</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gruber</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chou</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Regnier</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The spatiotemporal dynamics of the sources and sinks of CO<sub>2</sub> in the global coastal ocean</article-title>. <source>Global Biogeochem. Cycles</source> <volume>33</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>1693</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1714</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2019GB006239</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Takahashi</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Olafsson</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goddard</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chipman</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sutherland</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Seasonal variation of CO<sub>2</sub> and nutrients in the high-latitude surface oceans: A comparative study</article-title>. <source>Global Biogeochem. Cycles</source> <volume>7</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>843</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>878</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/93GB02263</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Takahashi</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sutherland</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chipman</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goddard</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ho</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Newberger</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Climatological distributions of pH, <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub>, total CO<sub>2</sub>, alkalinity, and CaCO<sub>3</sub> saturation in the global surface ocean, and temporal changes at selected locations</article-title>. <source>Mar. Chem.</source> <volume>164</volume>, <fpage>95</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>125</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.marchem.2014.06.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Takahashi</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sutherland</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sweeney</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Poisson</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Metzl</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tilbrook</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Global sea&#x2013;air CO<sub>2</sub> flux based on climatological surface ocean <italic>p</italic>CO<sub>2</sub>, and seasonal biological and temperature effects</article-title>. <source>Deep Sea Res. Part II: Topical Stud. Oceanogr.</source> <volume>49</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>1601</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1622</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0967-0645(02)00003-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Torres</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kwiatkowski</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sutton</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dorey</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Orr</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Characterizing mean and extreme diurnal variability of ocean CO2 system variables across marine environments</article-title>. <source>Geophys. Res. Lett.</source> <volume>48</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <elocation-id>e2020GL090228</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2020GL090228</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Upadhyay</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prajapati</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Impacts of riverine pollution on greenhouse gas emissions: A comprehensive review</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Indic.</source> <volume>154</volume>, <fpage>110649</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110649</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>van Vliet</surname> <given-names>M. T. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wiberg</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leduc</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Riahi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Power-generation system vulnerability and adaptation to changes in climate and water resources</article-title>. <source>Nat. Climate Change</source> <volume>6</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>375</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>380</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nclimate2903</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wanninkhof</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Relationship between wind speed and gas exchange over the ocean revisited</article-title>. <source>Limnol. Oceanogr.: Methods</source> <volume>12</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>351</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>362</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4319/lom.2014.12.351</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Weiss</surname> <given-names>R. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1974</year>). <article-title>Carbon dioxide in water and seawater: the solubility of a non-ideal gas</article-title>. <source>Mar. Chem.</source> <volume>2</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>203</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>215</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0304-4203(74)90015-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wibisono</surname> <given-names>A. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shwageraus</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Thermodynamic performance of pressurized water reactor power conversion cycle combined with fossil-fuel superheater</article-title>. <source>Energy</source> <volume>117</volume>, <fpage>190</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>197</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.060</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>K. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Milliman</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>H. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Decline of Yangtze River water and sediment discharge: Impact from natural and anthropogenic changes</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>5</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <elocation-id>12581</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep12581</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhong</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Revealing water stress by the thermal power industry in China based on a high spatial resolution water withdrawal and consumption inventory</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>50</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>1642</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1652</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.est.5b05374</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>