ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Mech. Eng.
Sec. Biomechanical Engineering
Effectiveness of Load Legs on Rear-Facing Only Child Restraint Systems (CRS) in Frontal Sled Tests
- JM
Julie Mansfield 1
- DR
Dan Ross 2
- JS
Janis Skujins 2
- NR
Nick Rydberg 2
- SS
Sara Seifert 2
1. The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
2. Minnesota HealthSolutions Corporation, Minneapolis, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Introduction: Load legs are a safety feature that brace child restraint systems (CRS) against the floor of the vehicle. Previous research has identified potential benefits in terms of energy absorption and injury metric reductions with this safety feature. The goal of this study is to establish the efficacy of a wider range of load leg designs and performance outcomes in frontal impacts compared to identical tests without load legs. Methods: The Consumer Reports test buck with front row blocker plate was used with a frontal impact pulse of approximately 34.5 g and 62.1 kph. One CRS model was tested with both an experimental "dampening" load leg design and an experimental "stiff" load leg design. Additionally, six different models of rear-facing only (RFO) infant CRS were tested with and without their load leg in position for three or more repetitions each, for a total of 55 tests. The Child Restraint and Airbag Interaction (CRABI) 12-month-old anthropomorphic test device (ATD) was used as the occupant in all tests. Results: The dampening and stiff load leg designs had similar injury metric outcomes to one another. Across the full sample, load legs significantly reduced the occurrence of CRS shell and ATD head contact against the blocker plate. On average, load legs reduced the rotation angle of the CRS by 10.3° (47.9%, p<0.0001), HIC15 by 1339.7 (73.3%, p<0.0001), head resultant acceleration by 69.3 g (50.8%, p<0.0001), and chest resultant acceleration by 14.6 g (19.8%, p<0.0001) compared to corresponding tests without load legs. Although the load legs collapsed in several tests, many injury metrics were still significantly reduced in these cases compared to corresponding tests without load legs. However, collapsed load legs were less effective at reducing CRS rotation, which might be an important factor in preventing head strikes in real-world crashes. Conclusions: Load legs provided significant benefits to the CRABI 12-month-old occupant in RFO CRS. Load legs that maintained their structural integrity produced the best results, but load legs that collapsed under loading still provided significant benefits to CRS occupants. These results support the use of load legs in families' vehicles when possible.
Summary
Keywords
Child restraint system, Crash safety, CRS, load leg, Motor vehicle crash (MVC), Rear-facing, Support leg
Received
23 June 2026
Accepted
04 August 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Mansfield, Ross, Skujins, Rydberg and Seifert. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Julie Mansfield
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.