AUTHOR=Qin Xiaoyi , Zhang Wei , Zhu Xiaodan , Hu Xiang , Zhou Wei 

TITLE=Early Fresh Frozen Plasma Transfusion: Is It Associated With Improved Outcomes of Patients With Sepsis?

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Medicine

VOLUME=Volume 8 - 2021

YEAR=2021

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.754859

DOI=10.3389/fmed.2021.754859

ISSN=2296-858X

ABSTRACT=<p><bold>Background:</bold> So far, no study has investigated the effects of plasma transfusion in the patients with sepsis, especially in the terms of prognosis. Therefore, we aimed to explore the association of early fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion with the outcomes of patients with sepsis.</p><p><bold>Methods:</bold> We performed a cohort study using data extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III database (v1.4). External validation was obtained from the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, China. We adopted the Sepsis-3 criteria to extract the patients with sepsis and septic shock. The occurrence of transfusion during the first 3-days of intensive care unit (ICU) stay was regarded as early FFP transfusion. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. We assessed the association of early FFP transfusion with the patient outcomes using a Cox regression analysis. Furthermore, we performed the sensitivity analysis, subset analysis, and external validation to verify the true strength of the results.</p><p><bold>Results:</bold> After adjusting for the covariates in the three models, respectively, the significantly higher risk of death in the FFP transfusion group at 28-days [e.g., Model 2: hazard ratio (<italic>HR</italic>) = 1.361, <italic>P</italic> = 0.018, 95% <italic>CI</italic> = 1.054–1.756] and 90-days (e.g., Model 2: <italic>HR</italic> = 1.368, <italic>P</italic> = 0.005, 95% <italic>CI</italic> = 1.099–1.704) remained distinct. Contrarily, the mortality increased significantly with the increase of FFP transfusion volume. The outcomes of the patients with sepsis with hypocoagulable state after early FFP transfusion were not significantly improved. Similar results can also be found in the subset analysis of the septic shock cohort. The results of external validation exhibited good consistency.</p><p><bold>Conclusions:</bold> Our study provides a new understanding of the rationale and effectiveness of FFP transfusion for the patients with sepsis. After recognizing the evidence of risk-benefit and cost-benefit, it is important to reduce the inappropriate use of FFP and avoid unnecessary adverse transfusion reactions.</p>