AUTHOR=Lee Taeho , Kim Won Ki , Kim Ae Jin , Ro Han , Chang Jae Hyun , Lee Hyun Hee , Chung Wookyung , Jung Ji Yong 

TITLE=Low-Osmolar vs. Iso-Osmolar Contrast Media on the Risk of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: A Propensity Score Matched Study

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Medicine

VOLUME=Volume 9 - 2022

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.862023

DOI=10.3389/fmed.2022.862023

ISSN=2296-858X

ABSTRACT=Objective: Among the various risk factors associated with contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI), the importance of osmolality and viscosity is emerging among the characteristics of contrast media (CM) itself. High osmolality CM (HOCM) is deprecated and low osmotic pressure (LOCM) and iso-osmotic pressure (IOCM) are mainly used in clinical situations where the results of studies on their effect on the development of CI-AKI are contradictory. We evaluated the association between type of CM and risk of CI-AKI. 

Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study to analyze the effect of type of CM on the development of CI-AKI. Using propensity score (PS) matching, 2,263 LOCM and IOCM group were paired for analysis from 5,267 patients and fulfilled the inclusion criteria among 12,742 patients who underwent CAG between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2016. LOCM included iopromide and iopamidol, IOCM was iodixanol. CI-AKI, which was the primary end point, was defined based on Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria within 48 hours after exposure to the CM. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used in the unmatched and matched cohort respectively. In addition, stratified model on clinically important variable including high Mehran score (≥ 6) was also used in the matched cohort.

Results: LOCM users showed an increased incidence of CI-AKI (11.7% vs. 9.3%; P = 0.006), but it lost statistical significance after PS matching (9.9% vs. 9.5%, P = 0.725). In multivariable analyses, the adjusted odds ratio for CI-AKI in LOCM group were 1.059 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.875–1.282; P = 0.555] in unmatched cohort and 0.987 (95% CI = 0.803–1.214; P = 0.901) in matched cohort. These results were also consistent with the high-risk (high Mehran score) group.

Conclusions: Although the role of CM types in the development of CI-AKI has been debated, our observation shows that the selection between LOCM and IOCM during CAG has no influence on the incidence of CI-AKI.