AUTHOR=Gu Kaier , Shang Wenxuan , Wang Dingzhou 

TITLE=Visceral obesity anthropometric indicators as predictors of acute pancreatitis severity

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Medicine

VOLUME=Volume 12 - 2025

YEAR=2025

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1536090

DOI=10.3389/fmed.2025.1536090

ISSN=2296-858X

ABSTRACT=BackgroundAcute pancreatitis (AP) severity assessment upon admission is crucial for prognosis, yet existing clinical scoring systems have limitations like delayed results, complexity, or low sensitivity. Obesity correlates with AP severity, but traditional body mass index (BMI) fails to accurately reflect visceral fat distribution. Although anthropometric indicators for visceral obesity offer alternatives, their predictive value for AP severity across all etiologies is poorly studied.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed 629 AP patients admitted to a tertiary hospital (2016–2023). Patients were classified as mild AP (MAP, n = 531) or moderately severe/severe AP (MSAP/SAP, n = 98) based on organ failure (modified Marshall score ≥ 2). Eleven anthropometric indicators and six clinical scoring systems were evaluated. Patients were randomly divided into training group (n = 441) and validation group (n = 188). LASSO regression identified key predictors from 37 clinical variables. Six machine learning (ML) models were built and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, area under the ROC curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).ResultsNine anthropometric indicators [waist circumference, body roundness index, BMI, conicity index, lipid accumulation products (LAP), waist triglyceride index (WTI), cardiometabolic index (CMI), visceral adiposity index (VAI), chinese visceral adiposity index] and all clinical scoring systems (Ranson score, Glasgow score, SIRS, BISAP, APACHE II, JSS) significantly differed between MAP and MSAP/SAP groups (p < 0.05). VAI demonstrated the highest predictive AUC among anthropometric indicators (0.737 vs. SIRS 0.750, JSS 0.815), but superior to Ranson score, Glasgow score, BISAP, and APACHE II. LAP, WTI, and CMI also showed strong AUCs (0.729, 0.722, 0.736 respectively). LASSO selected 15 variables. Among ML models, XGBoost model performed best on the validation group (AUC = 0.878), and relatively good calibration curve and DCA results.ConclusionVAI, CMI, LAP, and WTI are independent predictors of AP severity, with VAI showing the highest individual predictive capability among them. The XGBoost model, incorporating VAI and routinely available clinical variables, achieved excellent performance (AUC = 0.878) for early severity assessment, offering a potentially rapid and cost-effective clinical tool. This supports the utility of visceral obesity anthropometric indicators and ML models for improving early risk stratification in AP.