AUTHOR=Zou Qinghua , Wang Ruotian , Dong Yunfang , Li Weiming , Zhao Guoyun , Yin Zhaochuan , Hu Manqing , Li Yijun , Xu Qingwen , Wang Lixing , Shi Kaiwen , Liu Hongyuan , Hu Yichen , Zhao Yuanpei TITLE=Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting the risk of intestinal barrier dysfunction in patients after major abdominal surgery: a prospective cohort study JOURNAL=Frontiers in Medicine VOLUME=Volume 12 - 2025 YEAR=2025 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1606443 DOI=10.3389/fmed.2025.1606443 ISSN=2296-858X ABSTRACT=BackgroundIntestinal barrier dysfunction (IBDF) can lead to systemic inflammatory response syndrome and multiple organ failure, severely jeopardizing patient health. Preventing the occurrence of IBDF is crucial, but effective prediction and assessment tools are currently lacking. In this study, we aimed to construct and validate a nomogram for early prediction of the risk of IBDF in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.MethodsA total of 684 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were prospectively included, among whom patients from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University and Kunming Haikou Hospital were assigned to the training (n = 480) and external validation (n = 204) cohorts, respectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to screen for independent predictors of IBDF. Based on these factors, the nomogram was constructed to predict IBDF occurrence. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plot, decision curve analysis (DCA), and clinical impact curve (CIC) were used to evaluate the predictive performance and clinical utility of the model.ResultsIn the training and validation cohorts, 28.3 and 26.9% of patients experienced IBDF, respectively. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that surgical method, operative time, blood loss, infusion volume, albumin, interleukin-6, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and opioid use were independent predictors of IBDF. The AUC of the IBDF nomogram based on these eight variables was 0.946 (95% CI: 0.921–0.970) and 0.944 (95% CI: 0.907–0.981) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The calibration curves showed good consistency, and the DCA and CIC results showed that the constructed model has good clinical applicability.ConclusionWe established and validated an IBDF-nomogram for the first time to predict the risk of IBDF in patients after major abdominal surgery. This model provides a practical tool for clinicians to identify high-risk patients with IBDF in the early stage, which may have significance in guiding clinical treatment decisions.