<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2018.01390</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Cultivation of Drought-Tolerant and Insect-Resistant Rice Affects Soil Bacterial, but Not Fungal, Abundances and Community Structures</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Peng</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>Shuifeng</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Hua</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>Aihu</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Ming</surname> <given-names>Feng</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>Xueming</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/419314/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>The Biotechnology Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Shanghai</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Institute of Genetics&#x2013;Institute of Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University</institution>, <addr-line>Shanghai</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Shanghai Agrobiological Gene Center</institution>, <addr-line>Shanghai</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Christina Kaiser, Universit&#x00E4;t Wien, Austria</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Mariusz Cyco&#x0144;, Medical University of Silesia, Poland; Xuesong Luo, Huazhong Agricultural University, China</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Feng Ming, <email>fming@fudan.edu.cn</email> Xueming Tang, <email>sunsite@126.com</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002"><p>This article was submitted to Plant Microbe Interactions, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>29</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2018</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>09</volume>
<elocation-id>1390</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>13</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2018</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>06</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2018</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2018 Li, Ye, Liu, Pan, Ming and Tang.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2018</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Li, Ye, Liu, Pan, Ming and Tang</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>The impacts of rice varieties with stacked drought tolerance and insect resistance on soil microbiomes are poorly understood. Hence, the objective of this study was to investigate the effects resulting from the cultivation of the drought-tolerant and insect-resistant rice cultivar, Hanhui3T, on soil physical&#x2013;chemical properties, and bacterial and fungal community composition. Soil samples of Hanhui3T and conventional rice varieties (Hanhui3 and Zhonghua11) were collected in triplicate at the booting stage, and bacterial and fungal population sizes and community structures were assessed using qPCR and Illumina MiSeq sequencing, respectively. The Bt protein concentration of Hanhui3T was significantly higher than that of Hanhui3 and Zhonghua11, while the pH of Hanhui3T was significantly lower. Bacterial population sizes and community composition were significantly different between Hanhui3T and Hanhui3 (or Zhonghua11), while no similar effects were observed for fungal communities. These differences suggest that the effect of Hanhui3T cultivation on bacterial community composition is stronger than the effect on fungal communities. Moreover, bacterial abundance was positively correlated to soil pH, while bacterial community structure variations were mainly driven by soil pH and Bt protein concentration differences. In conclusion, the abundances and structure of bacterial communities were altered in rhizosphere with Hanhui3T cultivation that changed soil pH and Bt protein concentrations, while fungal communities displayed no such responsiveness.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>drought-tolerant and insect-resistant rice</kwd>
<kwd>Illumina MiSeq sequencing</kwd>
<kwd>Bt proteins</kwd>
<kwd>bacterial community composition</kwd>
<kwd>fungal community composition</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">31500461</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">National Natural Science Foundation of China<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100001809</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="39"/>
<page-count count="10"/>
<word-count count="0"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec><title>Introduction</title>
<p>The rhizosphere represents a hot spot for microbial activity and constitutes one of the most complex ecosystems on earth, with numerous complex interactions with neighboring plants and microbes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Mendes et al., 2013</xref>). Plant root exudates initiate and modulate the relationships between roots and soil microbes, whereby the quantity and quality of root exudates are determined by plant genotypes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Badri and Vivanco, 2009</xref>). Consequently, these relationships are often specific, indicating that changes in plant genotypes impact the association of specific microbial groups with plants, and thus altering the abundance and composition of the rhizosphere microbiome. The alteration of plant genotypes by genetic modification have a potential bearing on the organisms that are targeted by the modification, in addition to other potential (collateral) effects resulting from the modification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Cotta et al., 2014</xref>). There has been a remarkable decline in crop planting area and food production in areas with continued deterioration of drought conditions brought about by climate change (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Clive, 2016</xref>). Thus, the development of biotech crops with multiple favorable traits, such as drought and insect resistance, has increased dramatically, and rapid approval of these crops is needed.</p>
<p>A drought-tolerant and insect-resistant rice cultivar, Hanhui3T, has been developed by the Shanghai Agrobiological Gene Center of China. Field experiments have shown that Hanhui3T displays significant resistance to rice leaf roller, and apparently combines drought-tolerant traits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Ye et al., 2012</xref>). Importantly, the potential environmental effects of newly developed cultivars must be evaluated through environmental risk assessment before the cultivation of transgenic plants for commercial purposes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">National Research Council, 2002</xref>). Environmental risk assessments are based on precautionary principles and they are practiced on a case-by-case basis by taking into consideration the nature of the plant, trait and the potential receiving environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Khan et al., 2017</xref>). One of the major potential environmental risks associated with the use of drought- and insect-resistant rice varieties is the effect on soil and the inhabiting non-target organisms, including bacteria and fungi. The bacterial and fungal communities inhabiting the rhizosphere, that is the soil influenced by root metabolites, are influenced by soil types, plant species, local climates, and plant growth stages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Bu&#x00E9;e et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Dohrmann et al., 2013</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Sohn et al. (2016)</xref> suggest that the effects of drought-tolerant rice cultivation on soil microorganisms are not significant using plate counts and pyrosequencing. However, studies of the impact of transgenic rice with different genetic traits on rhizosphere microbial communities have revealed inconsistent results (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Turrini et al., 2015</xref>). Moreover, considering the Bt protein that is released in root exudates from transgenic Bt plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Saxena et al., 1999</xref>) and variation in drought stress-response gene expression, we hypothesized that drought- and insect-resistant rice varieties are likely to produce unintended effects on soil bacterial and the fungal communities. In addition, it is clear that factors, such as soil physical&#x2013;chemical properties and plant genotypes, greatly influence the corresponding rhizosphere microbial community compositions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Khan et al., 2017</xref>). The extent to which these factors, including soil Bt protein exposure, influence and contribute to indigenous microbial community is not yet fully understood. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Kennedy et al. (2004</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2005</xref>) hypothesized that bacterial communities are more sensitive to changes in environmental factors than fungal communities. However, additional studies are needed to evaluate whether bacterial and fungal community compositions differentially respond to the cultivation of drought and insect-resistant rice.</p>
<p>The objective of the present study was to characterize the effects of drought-tolerant and insect-resistant rice cultivation on the abundance and structure of soil bacterial and fungal communities. Bacterial and fungal population sizes were assessed with quantitative PCR (qPCR) of bacterial 16S rRNA genes and fungal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) genes, respectively. Changes in community structures (via 16S and 18S rRNA gene composition) between drought-tolerant and insect-resistant rice and conventional rice varieties were then assessed using Illumina MiSeq sequencing. Lastly, the relationships between soil bacterial and fungal community structures and soil physicochemical factors, including Bt protein exposure, were analyzed with redundancy analysis (RDA).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec><title>Plants and Field Design</title>
<p>Hanhui3T is a rice hybrid that produces the insecticidal delta endotoxin protein Cry1Ab/Ac, which confers resistant to pests and combines drought-tolerance traits. The Hanhui3T is bred by introducing the <italic>Cry1Ab/Ac</italic> gene into the rice cultivar Hanhui3 by agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Ye et al., 2012</xref>). A variety of the hybrid, Hanhui3, was included in this study that is a near isogenic parental counterpart to Hanhui3T, in addition to the conventional variety, Zhonghua11. Seeds of Hanhui3T, Hanhui3, and Zhonghua11 were obtained from the Shanghai Agrobiological Gene Center (Shanghai, China). Plants of the three rice varieties were grown in the same chambers within a glasshouse at the Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences. The experiment consisted of a randomized block design with nine replicate chambers, where each chamber had a volume of 100 cm &#x00D7; 100 cm &#x00D7; 30 cm. Each chamber contained plants of all three varieties (36 plants of each), which were planted with a distance of 15 cm between plants. The soil was classified as Fluvio marine blue purple clay and contained 13.3 g/kg of organic matter, 1.2 g/kg of total nitrogen, 90.5 mg/kg available N, and a pH of 7.4 (soil:water ratio 1:5). The seedlings were planted on May 30, 2016 and rice rhizospheres were sampled at the booting stage on August 25, 2016. After weeds and litter were removed from the soil surface, two types of soil samples were harvested. Bulk soil was excised from at least 4 mm away from any roots, and soils within 2 mm of the root surface were considered rhizosphere soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">DeAngelis et al., 2009</xref>). Plants were gently removed from soils and rhizospheres were collected by gently shaking roots to dislodge small adhering soil clumps. To ensure representativeness of samples, each sample was a composite from three chambers with the same rice variety. The samples were placed on ice in a cooler and transported to the laboratory on the same day. Soils were passed through a 2.0-mm sieve, and then a portion of the soil sample (collected in triplicate for each rice variety) was stored at -80&#x00B0;C before DNA extraction, while the remainder was stored at 4&#x00B0;C prior to the analysis of soil properties.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Analysis of Soil Physicochemical Properties and Soil Microbial DNA Extraction</title>
<p>Soil Cry proteins were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Dohrmann et al. (2013)</xref>. Briefly, 0.5 g of soil sample was added to a 2-mL microcentrifuge tube. Next, 1.0 mL extraction buffer (0.1 M Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>, 0.1 M NaHCO<sub>3</sub>, 5.0 mM EDTA, 50 mM Na<sub>4</sub>P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>7</sub>.10H<sub>2</sub>O, 0.1%Triton X-100, pH10) was added to fill the tube and the sample was mixed for 30 min at room temperature, followed by centrifugation for 5 min at 4&#x00B0;C at 12,000 &#x00D7;<italic>g</italic>. The supernatant was collected to measure Bt protein content using a commercial ELISA kit (QuantiPlate<sup>TM</sup> Kit for Cry1Ab/Cry1Ac, EnviroLogix Inc., Portland, ME, United States) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s protocol. Soil pH was determined by preparing a suspension of air-dried soil sample in water at a ratio of 1:5 (w/v), and pH was measured using a digital pH meter. Organic matter was determined using the potassium dichromate oxidation method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Lu, 2000</xref>), total nitrogen with the Kjeldahl procedure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Kirk, 1950</xref>), and available nitrogen (AN) by the hot alkaline permanganate method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Subbiah and Asija, 1956</xref>). Soil microbial DNA was extracted from the soil samples collected in triplicates as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Li et al., 2014</xref>). Total genomic DNA was extracted from 0.5 g of sample using the FastDNA SPIN Kit for soil (MP Biomedicals, LLC, Solon, OH, United States). Purified DNA was stored at -80&#x00B0;C for the analyses of qPCR and Illumina MiSeq sequencing.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Quantification of Bacterial and Fungal Community Abundances</title>
<p>Population sizes of soil bacterial and fungal communities were determined by qPCR assays according to methods described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Li et al., 2018</xref>), using the universal bacterial 16S rRNA gene primers 1369F (5&#x2032;-CGG TGA ATA CGT TCY CGG-3&#x2032;) and 1492R (5&#x2032;-GGW TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT T-3&#x2032;) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Suzuki et al., 2000</xref>), and fungal ITS genes primers NSI1 (5&#x2032;-GAT TGA ATG GCT WAG TGA GG-3&#x2032;) and 58A2R (5&#x2032;-CTG CGT TCT TCA TCG AT-3&#x2032;) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Mitchell and Zuccaro, 2006</xref>). The average bacterial and fungal qPCR efficiencies were 95.91 and 102.45%, respectively, with standard curve <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> values of 0.998 and 0.997, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Illumina MiSeq Sequencing of Bacterial 16S rRNA and Fungal 18S rRNA Genes</title>
<p>Twelve independent samples of the rhizosphere from the three rice varieties Hanhui3T, Hanhui3, and Zhonghua11, and bulk soil as a control (with three replicates each) were selected for Illumina MiSeq sequencing. Bacterial 16S rRNA gene fragments were amplified with the primers 515F (5&#x2032;-GTG CCA GCM GCC GCG G-3&#x2032;)/907R (5&#x2032;-CCG TCA ATT CMT TTR AGT TT-3&#x2032;) and fungal 18S rRNA gene fragments were amplified with the primers SSU0817F (5&#x2032;-TTA GCA TGG AAT AAT RRA ATA GGA-3&#x2032;)/SSU1196R (5&#x2032;-TCT GGA CCT GGT GAG TTT CC-3&#x2032;) using a thermocycler PCR system (GeneAmp 9700, ABI, United States). PCR reactions were performed in triplicate in 20 &#x03BC;l reaction mixtures containing 4 &#x03BC;l of 5&#x00D7; FastPfu buffer, 2 &#x03BC;l of 2.5 mM dNTPs, 0.8 &#x03BC;l of each primer (5 &#x03BC;M), 0.2 &#x03BC;l of BSA, 0.4 &#x03BC;l of FastPfu polymerase, 10 ng of template DNA, and deionized, distilled water added up to a total volume of 20 &#x03BC;l. Bacterial PCRs comprised the following steps: 3 min of denaturation at 95&#x00B0;C, followed by 27 cycles of 95&#x00B0;C for 30 s, annealing at 55&#x00B0;C for 30 s, elongation at 72&#x00B0;C for 45 s, and a final extension at 72&#x00B0;C for 10 min. Fungal PCRs were conducted using the following program: 3 min of denaturation at 95&#x00B0;C, followed by 35 cycles of 95&#x00B0;C for 30 s, annealing at 53&#x00B0;C for 30 s, elongation at 72&#x00B0;C for 45 s, and a final extension at 72&#x00B0;C for 10 min. The resultant PCR products were visualized on a 2% agarose gel, and then extracted and purified using an AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Axygen Biosciences, Union City, CA, United States). PCR products were quantified using QuantiFluor<sup>TM</sup>-ST (Promega, United States) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s protocol. Equimolar amounts of the PCR products were pooled and prepared for sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform at Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.</p>
<p>Raw sequence data were processed and analyzed using QIIME Pipeline version 1.8.0<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn01">1</xref></sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Caporaso et al., 2010</xref>). Briefly, low-quality sequences that were shorter than 200 bp and had an average quality score of less than 20 were removed prior to analysis. Chimeric sequences were detected and removed using the UCHIME algorithm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Edgar et al., 2011</xref>). The remaining high-quality sequences were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at the 97% sequence similarity level using the program: Cluster Database at High Identity with Tolerance (CD-HIT) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Li and Godzik, 2006</xref>). The taxonomy of each OTU was assessed using the RDP Classifier algorithm<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn02">2</xref></sup> against the SILVA (128/16S Bacteria) 16S rRNA and SILVA (128/18S Eukaryota) 18S rRNA gene databases and a confidence threshold of 70%. All of the bacterial 16S rRNA and fungal 18S rRNA gene sequence data analyzed in this study have been deposited in the GenBank short-read archive SRA accessions: SRP130072 and SRP130195, respectively. In order to compare relative differences among samples, a subset of 11,620 and 21,723 bacterial and fungal sequences (the lowest value for a sample in each dataset), respectively, were randomly selected from each sample.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Statistical Analyses</title>
<p>Beta-diversity estimates (Bray&#x2013;Curtis and Hellinger distances) were calculated using the QIIME pipeline (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Caporaso et al., 2010</xref>). To estimate alpha-diversity, the Shannon&#x2013;Wiener index <italic>H&#x2032;</italic>, Simpson index <italic>D</italic>, Richness <italic>R</italic>, and Chao1 indices were calculated and rarefaction curves were generated using the mothur software package (v 1.35.1) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Schloss et al., 2009</xref>). Hierarchical cluster analysis of samples based on Hellinger distances was performed using the R software package<sup><xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn03">3</xref></sup>. The statistical significance of differences in soil properties, 16S rRNA and ITS gene copies, and bacterial and fungal alpha-diversity among samples were examined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS 19.0 (SPSS Institute, Inc., 2010), and the shortest significant range (SSR) test was employed for multiple <italic>post hoc</italic> comparisons. In addition, the relationships between soil properties and 16S rRNA and ITS gene copies were tested by linear regression analyses using SPSS 19.0. Significant differences were considered as <italic>P</italic> &#x003C; 0.05. An analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) was performed using QIIME 1.8.0 software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Caporaso et al., 2010</xref>) to determine whether different soil samples had significantly different microbial communities. RDA was conducted to determine the environmental variables that were most related to bacterial and fungal community compositional differences, and the results were used to construct a soil property matrix for variation partitioning analysis in R (v.2.8.1) using a Mantel test with the Pearson correlation method and 1,000 permutations through the &#x201C;vegan&#x201D; package (v.1.15-1) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">R Core Team, 2006</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec><title>Results</title>
<sec><title>Soil Properties</title>
<p>The concentrations of soil Bt protein, organic matter, total N, and available N, in addition to pH are shown in <bold>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref></bold>. Cultivation of drought-tolerant and insect-resistant rice resulted in increased soil Bt protein content. The Bt protein content of the three rice varieties&#x2019; rhizosphere and bulk soils were between 49.34 and 75.39 pg/g soil. The Bt protein content in the Hanhui3T rhizosphere was significantly higher than that in the other samples. In addition, the soil pH of Hanhui3T was significantly lower than that of Hanhui3 and Zhonghua11, but no significant difference was noted between Hanhui3T and bulk soils. No differences in organic matter, total N, or available N contents were found among all of the samples.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Physical&#x2013;chemical characteristics of the soil samples used in this study<sup>a</sup>.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Rice Sample</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">pH (1:5 H<sub>2</sub>O)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Bt protein (pg/g)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Organic matter (g/kg)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Total N (g/kg)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Available N (mg/kg)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hanhui3T</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.46 &#x00B1; 0.01<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75.39 &#x00B1; 9.95<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.03 &#x00B1; 1.45<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.35 &#x00B1; 0.04<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">90.90 &#x00B1; 2.04<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hanhui3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.53 &#x00B1; 0.05<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49.34 &#x00B1; 2.41<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.46 &#x00B1; 0.87<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.35 &#x00B1; 0.08<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">91.84 &#x00B1; 1.39<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Zhonghua11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.55 &#x00B1; 0.06<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53.00 &#x00B1; 7.00<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.73 &#x00B1; 0.55<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.39 &#x00B1; 0.06<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">93.40 &#x00B1; 0.95<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BS</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.41 &#x00B1; 0.06<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">49.67 &#x00B1; 4.73<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.90 &#x00B1; 0.56<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.28 &#x00B1; 0.04<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">91.12 &#x00B1; 1.90<sup>a</sup></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<attrib><sup>a</sup><italic>Values represent the averages of three repetitions and the standard deviations. Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate a statistically significant difference at 0.05 level. BS indicates bulk soil control</italic>.</attrib>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec><title>qPCR Estimates of the Total Bacterial and Fungal Population Sizes</title>
<p>qPCR estimates of bacterial population sizes, as determined by 16S rRNA genes, were between 8.32 &#x00D7; 10<sup>9</sup> and 15.44 &#x00D7; 10<sup>9</sup> copy numbers g<sup>-1</sup> dry soil (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1A</xref></bold>). Fungal ITS rRNA gene copy numbers ranged from 4.59 &#x00D7; 10<sup>7</sup> to 5.78 &#x00D7; 10<sup>7</sup> copy numbers g<sup>-1</sup> dry soil (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1B</xref></bold>). The population sizes of soil bacteria within Hanhui3T were significantly lower than those of Hanhui3 and Zhonghua11 soils, but higher than in bulk soils. In contrast, the population sizes of soil fungi were not significantly different between Hanhui3T and Hanhui3 (or Zhongua11), but bulk soils had significantly smaller populations. Consequently, the effect of Hanhui3T cultivation on soil bacterial population sizes was greater than the effect on soil fungal population sizes. A pairwise analysis indicated that the abundance of total bacteria was significantly positively correlated (<italic>r</italic> = 0.741, <italic>p</italic> = 0.006) with soil pH (7.41&#x2013;7.55) (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref></bold>), but it was not significantly correlated with other soil properties. In contrast, the total abundance of fungi was not significantly correlated to any soil properties.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>Copy numbers of the 16S rRNA <bold>(A)</bold> and ITS <bold>(B)</bold> genes from the rhizosphere microbial DNA extracts (Mean &#x00B1; Standard Deviation) as determined by qPCR. BS indicates bulk soil control.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-09-01390-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p>Relationships between the abundance of total bacteria and the soil pH.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-09-01390-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec><title>Taxonomic Classification and Relative Abundance of Bacteria and Fungi by Illumina MiSeq Sequencing</title>
<p>In total, 171,013 and 333,361 high-quality sequences from 12 samples were obtained by Illumina MiSeq sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA and fungal 18S rRNA genes, respectively. A total of 36 bacterial phyla, 92 classes, 187 orders, 325 families, and 533 genera were detected in the bacterial dataset. The most abundant bacterial phyla were <italic>Proteobacteria</italic> (44.10%), <italic>Acidobacteria</italic> (16.20%), <italic>Bacteroidetes</italic> (12.60%), <italic>Actinobacteria</italic> (6.70%), and <italic>Chloroflexi</italic> (5.00%), with relative abundances ranging from 36.97 to 50.40%, from 12.48 to 26.20%, from 6.14 to 17.37%, from 4.00 to 9.04% and from 3.33 to 6.14% across all samples, respectively (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3A</xref></bold>). A total of 26 fungal phyla, 42 classes, 64 orders, 79 families, and 90 genera were detected in the fungal dataset. The most abundant fungal phyla were <italic>Ascomycota</italic> (85.03%), <italic>Ciliophora</italic> (7.50%) and unclassified fungi/Eukaryotes (2.28%), with relative abundances ranging from 65.78 to 94.83%, from 1.51 to 25.27% and from 0.81 to 5.36% across all samples, respectively (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3B</xref></bold>). There were 2,053 and 219 OTUs that were identified at the 97% similarity level for 16S rRNA and 18S rRNA genes, respectively. Rarefaction curves for all of the soil samples, based on OTUs, reached asymptotes, indicating that the data generated in this study was adequate for the analysis of the bacterial and fungal diversity in the rhizosphere samples collected (Supplementary Figures <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S1A,B</xref>). Moreover, coverage (<italic>C</italic>) based on OTUs, confirmed the adequate sampling of diversity with estimates of 96.39% and 99.87% (Supplementary Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S1</xref>) for bacteria and fungi, respectively. The results, taken together, suggest that the sequencing depth used for all 12 of the samples was adequate to detect the total diversity of bacterial and fungal communities.</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p>Relative abundance of major bacterial phyla <bold>(A)</bold> and fungal phyla <bold>(B)</bold> in the soil samples. BS indicates bulk soil control.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-09-01390-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec><title>Bacterial and Fungal Community Diversity</title>
<p>The alpha-diversity indices represented by the Shannon index <italic>H&#x2032;</italic>, Simpson index <italic>D</italic>, Richness index <italic>R</italic>, and Chao1 estimate for bacterial communities, were not significantly different between Hanhui3T and Hanhui3 (or Zhonghua11) (<bold>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref></bold>). However, the Chao1 estimate of bacterial community richness significantly differed between the rhizosphere and bulk soil communities. Likewise, the Shannon index <italic>H&#x2032;</italic>, Simpson index <italic>D</italic>, Richness index <italic>R</italic>, and Chao1 estimate for fungal communities were also not significantly different between Hanhui3T and Hanhui3 (or Zhonghua11) (<bold>Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">3</xref></bold>). Notably, the abovementioned diversity index showed significant difference between rhizosphere and bulk soil fungal communities.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>The Shannon&#x2013;Wiener index <italic>H&#x2032;</italic>, Simpson index <italic>D</italic>, Richness <italic>R</italic>, and Chao1 of the soil bacterial communities of different rice varieties<sup>a</sup>.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Rice sample</th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>H&#x2032;</italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>D</italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>R</italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Chao1</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hanhui3T</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.06 &#x00B1; 0.07<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0066 &#x00B1; 0.0009<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1508.33 &#x00B1; 21.13<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1859.82 &#x00B1; 44.07<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hanhui3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.01 &#x00B1; 0.20<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0082 &#x00B1; 0.0025<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1493.67 &#x00B1; 184.08<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1807.04 &#x00B1; 117.34<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Zhonghua11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.88 &#x00B1; 1.00<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0095 &#x00B1; 0.0018<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1392.67 &#x00B1; 43.25<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1759.45 &#x00B1; 52.38<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BS</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.98 &#x00B1; 0.07<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.0060 &#x00B1; 0.0005<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1304.67 &#x00B1; 48.29<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1586.90 &#x00B1; 34.44<sup>b</sup></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<attrib><sup>a</sup><italic>Values represent the averages of three repetitions and the standard deviations. Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate a statistically significant difference at 0.05 level. BS indicates bulk soil control</italic>.</attrib>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption><p>The Shannon&#x2013;Wiener index <italic>H&#x2032;</italic>, Simpson index <italic>D</italic>, Richness <italic>R</italic>, and Chao1 of the soil fungal communities of different rice varieties<sup>a</sup>.</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Rice sample</th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>H&#x2032;</italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>D</italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><italic>R</italic></th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Chao1</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hanhui3T</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.62 &#x00B1; 0.04<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1451 &#x00B1; 0.0026<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">133.33 &#x00B1; 4.04<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">146.61 &#x00B1; 8.15<sup>ab</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Hanhui3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.71 &#x00B1; 0.09<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1285 &#x00B1; 0.0106<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">141.33 &#x00B1; 14.36<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">150.14 &#x00B1; 15.36<sup>ab</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Zhonghua11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.69 &#x00B1; 0.20<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1302 &#x00B1; 0.0306<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">140.67 &#x00B1; 4.73<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">168.22 &#x00B1; 10.82<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BS</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.36 &#x00B1; 0.17<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.1948 &#x00B1; 0.0333<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">111.67 &#x00B1; 11.55<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="top" align="center">125.20 &#x00B1; 7.25<sup>c</sup></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<attrib><sup>a</sup><italic>Values represent the averages of three repetitions and the standard deviations. Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate a statistically significant difference at 0.05 level. BS indicates bulk soil control</italic>.</attrib>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Hierarchical cluster analysis of the bacterial communities indicated that the rhizosphere communities from the three rice varieties and bulk soils belonged to two separate groups. This observation suggests an influence of root exudates on bacterial community composition (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4A</xref></bold>). In addition, the rhizosphere communities from the Hanhui3T and conventional rice variety (Hanhui3 and Zhonghua11) cultivar clustered into two separate groups, indicating that cultivation of insect-resistant and drought-tolerant rice considerably influenced bacterial community composition. Cluster analysis of fungal communities revealed similar clustering patterns between rhizosphere and bulk soil (<bold>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4B</xref></bold>). However, communities from Hanhui3T and Hanhui3 (or Zhonghua11) did not segregate into two distinct groups, suggesting that the cultivation of insect-resistant and drought-tolerant rice did not affect fungal community composition as drastically as that of bacteria. Analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) showed that the difference in bacterial community composition in both Hanhui3 and Zhonghua11 compared to the Hanhui3T was significant (sample statistic (Hanhui3/Hanhui3T) = 0.719, <italic>p</italic> = 0.017; sample statistic (Zhonghua11/Hanhui3T = 0.724, <italic>p</italic> = 0.048), whereas the community composition of Hanhui3 and Zhonghua11 did not differ. However, the ANOSIM assay showed no significant difference among the fungal microbial communities from different soil samples.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption><p>Hierarchical cluster analysis of the bacterial <bold>(A)</bold> and fungal <bold>(B)</bold> communities from different rice varieties rhizosphere and bulk soil based on the Hellinger distances of microbial communities. BS indicates bulk soil control.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-09-01390-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec><title>Correlations Between Bacterial and Fungal Community Composition and Soil Properties</title>
<p>The relationships between soil properties and bacterial and fungal community compositions, at the genus level, were analyzed by RDA (<bold>Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5A,B</xref></bold>). The first two RDA components explained 64.58% of the total variation in bacterial community composition and 68.43% of the total variation in fungal community composition. Soil pH was most correlated with variation in bacterial community composition (<italic>r</italic> = 0.75, <italic>p</italic> = 0.024), followed closely by Bt protein concentrations (<italic>r</italic> = 0.73, <italic>p</italic> = 0.024). However, the other environmental variables were not significantly correlated (<italic>p</italic> > 0.05) to bacterial community variation. In contrast, none of the aforementioned soil variables were significantly correlated (<italic>p</italic> > 0.05) to variation in fungal communities. Spearman&#x2019;s rank-order correlation was used to assess the response of specific bacterial and fungal genera to soil Bt protein concentrations (Supplementary Tables <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S2</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S3</xref>). Thirty-four bacterial genera and seven fungal genera were correlated significantly with soil Bt protein concentrations. The relative abundances of bacterial genera, including <italic>Coxiella</italic>, <italic>Blastopirellula</italic>, <italic>Sorangium</italic>, and <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, were positively correlated with Bt protein concentrations, while <italic>Gemmatimonas</italic>, <italic>Flavisolibacter</italic>, <italic>Flavitalea</italic>, and others, were negatively correlated with Bt protein concentrations. In addition, the relative abundance of unclassified fungal genera from the <italic>Vampyrellidae</italic>, <italic>Agaricomycetes</italic>, and <italic>RM2-SGM5</italic> groups, in addition to <italic>Neourostylopsis</italic>, were significantly positively correlated with Bt protein concentrations, whereas abundances of unclassified genera from the <italic>Craspedida</italic>, <italic>Malasseziales</italic>, and <italic>Savoryellales</italic> were significantly negatively correlated with Bt protein concentrations.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption><p>RDA results of the soil properties and bacterial <bold>(A)</bold> and fungal <bold>(B)</bold> community compositions at the genus level. BS indicates bulk soil control. The number on each axis indicates the percentage of the total variation explained.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-09-01390-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec><title>Discussion</title>
<sec><title>Cultivation of Drought-Tolerant and Insect-Resistant Rice Altered Bt Protein Contents and Soil pH</title>
<p>It has been widely reported that Cry proteins can be released into soils in the root exudates of Bt plants during growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Saxena and Stotzky, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Rui et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Knox et al., 2007</xref>). In the present study, the content of rhizosphere Bt protein was significantly higher in Hanhui3T soils compared to Hanhui3 and Zhonghua11 soils at the booting stage. Rhizosphere Bt protein concentrations from Hanhui3T were the highest at the booting stage of all of the growth stages, prompting our assessment of the rhizosphere microbial communities at this stage. Notably, we observed significantly lower pH in the Hanhui3T soils compared to Hanhui3 and Zhonghua11, while other soil factors were equivalent. This finding contrasts with a previous study that did not observe significant differences in soil pH between the cultivation of drought-tolerant transgenic rice and the parental rice cultivar (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Sohn et al., 2016</xref>). The observed decrease in pH could have been caused by degradation of Bt proteins, which may lead to increased availability of amino acids, release of ammonia and subsequent nitrification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Dohrmann et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Gundersen and Rasmussen, 2013</xref>). Hence, we characterized the proportion of Cry proteins in the total protein content of the rhizosphere, which was determined to be low (Supplementary Material and Methods). Consequently, we speculated that the increase of a small proportion of Cry protein due to genetic modification is unable to alter soil pH significantly, when considering the total protein content in the rhizosphere. Another explanation for the observed pH differences is related to differences in root exudates in the vicinities of roots from the different rice varieties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Somers et al., 2004</xref>). Thus, we cultured three rice varieties in International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) solution and found that the total amount of organic acids in root exudates from Hanhui3T was dramatically higher than compared to Hanhui3 and Zhonghua11 (Supplementary Table <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">S4</xref>). Thus, the lower pH of rhizosphere soils of Hanhui3T may be related to the clear increase in organic acid abundances in its root exudates when compared to control varieties. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Hartmann et al. (2009)</xref> found that root exudates containing particular organic acids can modulate local environmental conditions, such as pH, resulting in microbial community variation. However, whether other organic compounds of root exudates could also affect soil pH requires further investigation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Effect of Drought-Tolerant and Insect-Resistant Rice Cultivation on Total Bacterial and Fungal Abundances</title>
<p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Cotta et al. (2014)</xref> suggested that microbial community abundances should be studied as bioindicators when monitoring for possible impacts of genetically modified plant cultivation. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Sohn et al. (2016)</xref> did not detect significant differences in microbial community abundances in the soils of drought-tolerant transgenic rice and the parental rice cultivar using plate counts. However, considering that only a small fraction of soil microbial communities are cultured (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Hill et al., 2000</xref>), we used real-time qPCR to accurately estimate bacterial and fungal abundances. Our results challenged the above conclusion based on the plate counting data. We found the abundance of bacteria in the drought and insect resistant rice rhizosphere was lower than those associated with the drought resistant only rice and conventional rice, although it was still higher than that in the bulk soil. In contrast, total fungal abundance of Hanhui3T was only significantly higher than that of bulk soils, and did not differ from the other two conventional rice varieties. Accordingly, correlation analysis was conducted to quantify the relationships between soil characteristics and microbial community abundances. Among the soil parameters that were tested, only soil pH was positively correlated with bacterial 16S rRNA gene copy numbers, suggesting that pH was the main driver of bacterial abundances. These results are consistent with those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Rousk et al. (2010)</xref>, who used qPCR and a bar-coded pyrosequencing technique, and found that both the relative abundance and diversity of bacteria were positively correlated to pH, while the relative abundance of fungi was unaffected by pH. However, it should be noted that the components of Bt protein that is released in root exudates could bind to soil humic acids rapidly, resulting in inefficient recovery and quantification of Bt protein concentrations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Crecchio and Stotzky, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Valldor et al., 2015</xref>). Nevertheless, our results revealed that the abundance of bacteria and fungi was significantly different between rhizospheres and bulk soils, indicating that rice plants interacted with, and affected rhizosphere microbial communities. Furthermore, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Badri and Vivanco (2009)</xref> found that the release of root exudates in the rhizosphere supported a highly specific diversity of microbes. Our results in combination with their findings suggested that there is a close co-evolutionary link between plant genotypes and rhizosphere population recruitment.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Effect of Drought-Tolerant and Insect-Resistant Rice Cultivation on Rhizosphere Bacterial and Fungal Community Diversity and Composition</title>
<p>In contrast to low-throughput sequencing methods, which typically limit analysis to the most dominant phylotypes in microbial communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Lee et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Li et al., 2014</xref>), the Illumina MiSeq sequencing approach applied here detected 533 bacterial genera and 90 fungal genera. Consequently, these high-throughput analyses allowed the detection of much less abundant members by a factor of more than two orders of magnitude relative to lower-throughput sequencing methods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Dohrmann et al., 2013</xref>). Although soil bacterial community diversity indices (<italic>H&#x2032;</italic>, <italic>D</italic>, <italic>R</italic>, and Chao1) did not differ significantly between Hanhui3T and Hanhui3 (or Zhonghua11), distinct bacterial community structures were present among these samples. Specifically, Hanhui3 and Zhonghua11 clustered together firstly, suggesting varieties related to the genetic modification had remarkable effect on bacterial community composition. No apparent changes in fungal community composition between drought-tolerant and insect-resistant rice and conventional varieties were found, supporting the hypothesis that bacterial communities are more sensitive to environmental factors than fungal communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Taylor et al., 2010</xref>). Indeed, previous studies have indicated that fungal communities have greater resistance to changes in environmental factors compared to bacterial communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Kennedy et al., 2004</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2005</xref>). Differences in the bacterial community structure between Hanhui3T and Hanhui3 (or Zhonghua11) were hypothesized to result from unintentional changes in root exudate composition or by direct effects resulting from soil chemical parameters on soil microorganisms. RDA indicated that soil pH and Bt protein concentrations were significantly related to variation in bacterial community composition, but that other soil parameters had no significant influences. Although soil pH is commonly regarded as the primary variable responsible for soil bacterial community changes, our results indicated that the impacts of other environmental variables on bacterial community composition varied with soil samples. However, owing to the difficult characterization of rhizosphere organic compounds within root exudates, more studies are required to further evaluate the ecological and co-evolutionary role of root exudates in shaping soil microbial communities. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Valldor et al. (2015)</xref> demonstrated that the Bt protein of GM crops could be utilized by microorganism as a growth substrate using <sup>14</sup>C-tracer studies in two agricultural soils. In this study, we also found a total of 34 bacterial genera and 7 fungal genera that were significantly correlated to Bt protein concentrations. Whether these genera were real Bt utilized as growth sources remained unclear. This should be confirmed by future investigation. The other possibility is that bacteria from these genera utilized the dead insects killed by Bt toxins and thus statistically correlated with Bt contents.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec><title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In conclusion, this study represents the first ecological risk assessment of the potential effects of drought-tolerant and insect-resistant rice cultivation on rhizosphere microbial communities. Rhizosphere bacterial abundances and community structures were substantially different between drought-tolerant and insect-resistant rice cultivation and conventional rice variety cultivation at the booting stage. However, these effects were not observed for fungal community composition, indicating that the effects of drought-tolerant and insect-resistant rice cultivation were stronger for bacterial community composition compared to fungi community composition. Moreover, bacterial abundance was positively associated with soil pH, while bacterial community composition structure was primarily controlled by soil pH and Bt protein concentrations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>XT and FM designed the experiments. PL performed most of the experiments. AP performed some of the experiments. SY contributed materials and analysis tools. HL analyzed data and discussed the result. PL wrote the manuscript. FM edited the manuscript. XT analyzed the data and edited the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec><title>Conflict of Interest Statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<fn-group>
<fn fn-type="financial-disclosure">
<p><bold>Funding.</bold> This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 31500461, the Key Technologies Program of Shanghai Agricultural Commission No. 2015 (4-3), the Shanghai Agriculture Committee Young Talent Foundation No. 1-15 (2016), and the SAAS Program for Excellent Research Team No. 2017 (B-07).</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
<ack>
<p>We would like to thank Christoph C. Tebbe and Anja B. Dohrmann (Institute of Biodiversity, Johann Heinrich von Th&#x00FC;nen-Institute (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries, Braunschweig, Germany) for analytical method assistance. We gratefully acknowledge Yongchun Li (Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, China) for interpretation of data for the work.</p>
</ack>
<sec sec-type="supplementary material">
<title>Supplementary Material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01390/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01390/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.DOC" id="SM1" mimetype="application/msword" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Badri</surname> <given-names>D. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vivanco</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Regulation and function of root exudates.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Cell Environ.</italic></source> <volume>32</volume> <fpage>666</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>681</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01926.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bu&#x00E9;e</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Boer</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>F. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Overbeek</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jurkevitch</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>The rhizosphere zoo: an overview of plant-associated communities of microorganisms, including phages, bacteria, archaea, and fungi, and of some of their structuring factors.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Soil</italic></source> <volume>321</volume> <fpage>189</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>212</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-009-9991-3</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Caporaso</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuczynski</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stombaugh</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bittinger</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bushman</surname> <given-names>F. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Costello</surname> <given-names>E. K.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>QIIME allows analysis of high throughput community sequencing data.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Methods</italic></source> <volume>7</volume> <fpage>335</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>336</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.f.303</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20383131</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Clive</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <source><italic>Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops:2016. ISAAA Brief</italic></source> 52. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA, <fpage>4</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cotta</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Franco Dias</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Marriel</surname> <given-names>I. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andreote</surname> <given-names>F. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Seldin</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Elsas</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Different effects of transgenic maize and nontransgenic maize on nitrogen-transforming archaea and bacteria in tropical soils.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>80</volume> <fpage>6437</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6445</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.01778-14</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25107970</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Crecchio</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stotzky</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Insecticidal activity and biodegradation of the toxin from <italic>Bacillus thuringiensis</italic> subsp. Kustuki bound to humic acids from soil.</article-title> <source><italic>Soil Biol Biochem.</italic></source> <volume>30</volume> <fpage>463</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>470</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00147-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>DeAngelis</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brodie</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>DeSantis</surname> <given-names>T. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Andersen</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lindow</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Firestone</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Selective progressive response of soil microbial community to wild oat roots.</article-title> <source><italic>ISME J.</italic></source> <volume>3</volume> <fpage>168</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>178</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2008.103</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19005498</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dohrmann</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>K&#x00FC;ting</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>J&#x00FC;nemann</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jaenicke</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schl&#x00FC;ter</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tebbe</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Importance of rare taxa for bacterial diversity in the rhizosphere of Bt- and conventional maize.</article-title> <source><italic>ISME J.</italic></source> <volume>7</volume> <fpage>37</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>49</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2012.77</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22791236</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Edgar</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haas</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clemente</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Quince</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knight</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioinformatics</italic></source> <volume>27</volume> <fpage>2194</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2200</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21700674</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gundersen</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rasmussen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Nitrification in forest soils: effects from nitrogen deposition on soil acidification and aluminum release.</article-title> <source><italic>Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.</italic></source> <volume>113</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>45</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hartmann</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schmid</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>van Tuinen</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berg</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Plant-driven selection of microbes.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Soil</italic></source> <volume>321</volume> <fpage>235</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>257</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-008-9814-y</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hill</surname> <given-names>G. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mitkowski</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aldrich-Wolfe</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Emele</surname> <given-names>L. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jurkonie</surname> <given-names>D. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ficke</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Methods for assessing the composition and diversity of soil microbial communities.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Soil Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>15</volume> <fpage>25</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>36</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0929-1393(00)00069-X</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kennedy</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brodie</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Connolly</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clipson</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Impact of lime, nitrogen and plant species on bacterial community structure in grassland microcosm.</article-title> <source><italic>Environ. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>6</volume> <fpage>1070</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1080</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00638.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15344932</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kennedy</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Connolly</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Clipson</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Impact of lime, nitrogen and plant species on fungal community structure in grassland microcosms.</article-title> <source><italic>Environ. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>7</volume> <fpage>780</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>788</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00748.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15892697</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sadat</surname> <given-names>S. U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Munir</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Impact of transgenic <italic>Brassica napus</italic> harboring the antifungal synthetic chitinase (NiC) gene on rhizosphere microbial diversity and enzyme activities.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Plant Sci.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>:<issue>1307</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2017.01307</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28791039</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kirk</surname> <given-names>P. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1950</year>). <article-title>Kjeldahl method for total nitrogen.</article-title> <source><italic>Anal. Chem.</italic></source> <volume>22</volume> <fpage>354</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>358</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/ac60038a038</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Knox</surname> <given-names>O. G. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>V. V. S. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nehl</surname> <given-names>D. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stiller</surname> <given-names>W. N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Constitutive expression of Cry proteins in roots and border cells of transgenic cotton.</article-title> <source><italic>Euphytica</italic></source> <volume>154</volume> <fpage>83</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>90</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10681-006-9272-7</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>C. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Temporal dynamics of bacterial and fungal communities in a genetically modified (GM) rice ecosystem.</article-title> <source><italic>Microb. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>61</volume> <fpage>646</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>659</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00248-010-9776-5</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21128072</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>S. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>G. G.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Impact of beta-carotene transgenic rice with four synthetic genes on rhizosphere enzyme activities and bacterial communities at different growth stages.</article-title> <source><italic>Eur. J. Soil Biol.</italic></source> <volume>65</volume> <fpage>40</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>46</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejsobi.2014.09.002</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>X. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>L. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ming</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>A. H.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Rice straw decomposition affects diversity and dynamics of soil fungal community, but not bacteria.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Soils Sediments</italic></source> <volume>18</volume> <fpage>248</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>258</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11368-017-1749-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Godzik</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Cd-hit: A fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences.</article-title> <source><italic>Bioinformatics</italic></source> <volume>22</volume> <fpage>1658</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1659</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16731699</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <source><italic>Analytical Methods for Soil and Agro-Chemistry.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Beijing</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>China Agricultural Science and Technology Press</publisher-name>, <fpage>108</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>109</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mendes</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garbeva</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raaijmakers</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>The rhizosphere microbiome: significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms.</article-title> <source><italic>FEMS Microbiol. Rev.</italic></source> <volume>37</volume> <fpage>634</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>663</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1574-6976.12028</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23790204</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mitchell</surname> <given-names>J. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zuccaro</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Sequences, the environment and fungi.</article-title> <source><italic>Mycologist</italic></source> <volume>20</volume> <fpage>62</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>74</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mycol.2005.11.004</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>National Research Council</collab> (<year>2002</year>). <source><italic>Environmental Effects of Transgenic Plants.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Washington, DC</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>National Academy Press</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>R Core Team</collab> (<year>2006</year>). <source><italic>R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.</italic></source> <publisher-loc>Vienna</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>R Foundation for Statistical Computing</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rousk</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baath</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brookes</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lauber</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lozupone</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Caporaso</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil.</article-title> <source><italic>ISME J.</italic></source> <volume>4</volume> <fpage>1340</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1351</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2010.58</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20445636</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rui</surname> <given-names>Y. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>G. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhai</surname> <given-names>Z. X.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Changes of Bt toxin in the rhizosphere of transgenic Bt cotton and its influence on soil functional bacteria.</article-title> <source><italic>World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</italic></source> <volume>21</volume> <fpage>1279</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1284</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11274-005-2303-z</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Saxena</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Flores</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stotzky</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Insecticidal toxin in root exudates from Bt corn.</article-title> <source><italic>Nature</italic></source> <volume>402</volume>:<issue>480</issue>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/44997</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10591205</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Saxena</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stotzky</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title><italic>Bacillus thuringiensis</italic> (Bt) toxin released from root exudates and biomass of Bt corn has no apparent effect on earthworms, nematodes, protozoa, bacteria, and fungi in soil.</article-title> <source><italic>Soil Biol Biochem.</italic></source> <volume>33</volume> <fpage>1225</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1230</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00027-X</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schloss</surname> <given-names>P. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Westcott</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ryabin</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hall</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hartmann</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hollister</surname> <given-names>E. B.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>75</volume> <fpage>7537</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7541</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.01541-09</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19801464</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sohn</surname> <given-names>S. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oh</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>B. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cho</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Effects of CaMSRB2-expressing transgenic rice cultivation on soil microbial communities.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</italic></source> <volume>26</volume> <fpage>1303</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1310</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4014/jmb.1601.01058</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27090184</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Somers</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vanderleyden</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Srinivisam</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Rhizospherebacterial signaling: a love parade beneath our feet.</article-title> <source><italic>Crit. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>30</volume> <fpage>205</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>240</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10408410490468786</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15646398</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Subbiah</surname> <given-names>B. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Asija</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1956</year>). <article-title>A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils.</article-title> <source><italic>Curr. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>25</volume> <fpage>518</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>522</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Suzuki</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>L. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>DeLong</surname> <given-names>E. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Quantitative analysis of small subunit rRNA genes in mixed microbial populations via 5&#x2019;-nuclease assays.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>66</volume> <fpage>4605</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4614</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.66.11.4605-4614.2000</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11055900</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Herriott</surname> <given-names>I. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stone</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McFarlan</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Booth</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leigh</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Structure and resilience of fungal communities in Alaskan boreal forest soils.</article-title> <source><italic>Can. J. For. Res.</italic></source> <volume>40</volume> <fpage>1288</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1301</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/X10-081</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Turrini</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sbrana</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Giovannetti</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Belowground environmental effects of transgenic crops: a soil microbial Perspective.</article-title> <source><italic>Res. Microbiol.</italic></source> <volume>166</volume> <fpage>121</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>131</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.resmic.2015.02.006</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25728596</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Valldor</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Graff</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martens</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tebbe</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Fate of the insecticidal Cry1Ab protein of GM crops in two agricultural soils as revealed by 14C-tracer studies.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</italic></source> <volume>99</volume> <fpage>7333</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7341</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-015-6655-5</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25967657</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>S. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>T. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Production and identification of water-saving and drought-resistant transgenic indica-type rice with cry1C gene.</article-title> <source><italic>Acta Agric. Shanghai</italic></source> <volume>28</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3</lpage>.</citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn id="fn01"><label>1</label><p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://qiime.org/tutorials/tutorial.html">http://qiime.org/tutorials/tutorial.html</ext-link></p></fn>
<fn id="fn02"><label>2</label><p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/">http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/</ext-link></p></fn>
<fn id="fn03"><label>3</label><p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.rproject.org/">http://www.rproject.org/</ext-link></p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>