Regulatory Hierarchies Controlling Virulence Gene Expression in Shigella flexneri and Vibrio cholerae

Abstract

Gram-negative enteropathogenic bacteria use a variety of strategies to cause disease in the human host and gene regulation in some form is typically a part of the strategy. This article will compare the toxin-based infection strategy used by the non-invasive pathogen Vibrio cholerae, the etiological agent in human cholera, with the invasive approach used by Shigella flexneri, the cause of bacillary dysentery. Despite the differences in the mechanisms by which the two pathogens cause disease, they use environmentally-responsive regulatory hierarchies to control the expression of genes that have some features, and even some components, in common. The involvement of AraC-like transcription factors, the integration host factor, the Factor for inversion stimulation, small regulatory RNAs, the RNA chaperone Hfq, horizontal gene transfer, variable DNA topology and the need to overcome the pervasive silencing of transcription by H-NS of horizontally acquired genes are all shared features. A comparison of the regulatory hierarchies in these two pathogens illustrates some striking cross-species similarities and differences among mechanisms coordinating virulence gene expression. S. flexneri, with its low infectious dose, appears to use a strategy that is centered on the individual bacterial cell, whereas V. cholerae, with a community-based, quorum-dependent approach and an infectious dose that is several orders of magnitude higher, seems to rely more on the actions of a bacterial collective.

Introduction

Shigella flexneri and Vibrio cholerae are Gram-negative enteric pathogens of humans, causing the diarrheal diseases dysentery and cholera, respectively. Although both cause diarrheal diseases in humans and enter via the oral route, they differ in the site of infection, the mechanisms by which they cause damage to the host and in their infectious doses. Infections by V. cholerae leading to diarrheal disease arise from ingestion of contaminated food or water and affect the small intestine, with the bacterium remaining extracellular (Fu et al., 2018). V. cholerae uses a T6SS to eliminate competing members of the host microbiota at the site of infection(Zhao et al., 2018), colonizes the cleansed zone with the help of the TCP adhesin before producing CT to alter the physiology of adjacent epithelial cells (Figure 1). V. cholerae produces CT, a potent enterotoxin that is produced in response to environmental signals that are characteristic of the lumen of the human small intestine. CT binds to GM1 gangliosides on the epithelial layer (King and van Heyningen, 1973), enters the epithelial cell where it dysregulates human adenylate cyclase by ADP-ribosylation (Cohen and Chang, 2018), causing over-production of the second messenger cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) (Chen et al., 1971; Sharp and Hynie, 1971) (Figure 1). This in turn causes watery diarrhea characterized by a rapid loss of water and electrolytes that, if unchecked, can prove fatal to the patient (De Haan and Hirst, 2004).

FIGURE 1

In contrast, S. flexneri invades the M cells in the epithelium of the lower gut (Wassef et al., 1989; Perdomo et al., 1994). Next, S. flexneri undergoes transcytosis to the M cell pocket where it encounters and is engulfed by macrophage (Figure 1). The bacterium escapes from the macrophage vacuole by disrupting it, multiplies in the cytosol before inducing inflammatory cell death (Zychlinsky et al., 1992). The released S. flexneri bacteria invade nearby epithelial cells through their basolateral surfaces, promoting actin cytoskeleton rearrangements that result in engulfment of the bacteria (High et al., 1992). This produces bacteria-containing vacuoles that are soon ruptured (Weiner et al., 2016) with the released bacteria inducing actin polymerization at one pole of each microbial cell to achieve motility in the host cell cytosol (Mauricio et al., 2016). The bacterium is capable of moving from one cell to the next via clathrin-dependent endocytosis (Fukumatsu et al., 2012), escaping from the double-membrane-enclosed vacuole after each new invasion (Welch and Way, 2013). This damages the epithelium, induces an inflammatory response and results in the bloody diarrhea that is characteristic of dysentery (Ashida et al., 2015) (Figure 1).

This article will focus on the genetics of serogroup O1 and O139 V. cholerae biotype El Tor, which are responsible for the seventh cholera pandemic, and form a single phylogenetic lineage, 7PET (Domman et al., 2017). Although there are over 200 serogroups of V. cholerae (Shimada et al., 1994; Chapman et al., 2015), only serogroups O1 and O139 cause epidemic cholera. It should be noted that two biotypes of toxigenic V. cholerae O1, classical and El Tor, have been described, and there are differences in virulence gene expression between the two (Beyhan et al., 2006). Notably, classical strains of V. cholerae express virulence genes under standard laboratory conditions, and produce CT when cultured in rich media. By contrast, El Tor V. cholerae produce CT only when cultured under stringent in vitro growth conditions (Iwanaga and Yamamoto, 1985; Iwanaga et al., 1986). However, laboratory strains of both classical and El Tor V. cholerae have been used to dissect the regulatory systems described in this article.

Shigella flexneri and V. cholerae differ in the sizes of the doses required to initiate a successful infection. In the case of S. flexneri, the infectious dose can be as low as 10 cells whereas V. cholerae requires between 10³ and 10⁸ cells (Schmid-Hempel and Frank, 2007). It has been suggested that the presence of an extreme acid resistance (XAR) system in S. flexneri and its absence from V. cholerae may help to explain the difference in infectious dose: fewer V. cholerae bacteria will survive the transit through the low pH environment of the stomach, so a high infectious dose is necessary to establish an infection in the gut (Lund et al., 2014). The difference in infectious dose is also consistent with the important role that is played by cell-to-cell communication in V. cholerae compared with the more individualistic style that characterizes S. flexneri infection. In each pathogen, the genes encoding the principal virulence factors are only produced when the bacterium arrives at the correct location in the host. This indicates that the bacteria use physical and/or chemical information from the host to make a decision at the molecular level to produce or to repress production of virulence and colonization genes. In both examples, many genes have to be regulated collectively and their expression has to be finely controlled in space and time. In both cases, mobile genetic elements carry important virulence genes and their relationships with the bacterial chromosome have a significant influence on the stability of these genes and their expression.

Horizontal Gene Transfer and Virulence in S. flexneri and V. cholerae

Shigella flexneri and V. cholerae both show evidence of an important role for horizontal gene transfer in the their evolution as pathogens. Many of the virulence genes are A + T-rich compared to the A + T content of the core genome, the transcription of these genes is silenced by the H-NS DNA binding protein and important genes are located on genetic elements that are either currently mobile and transmissible, or have been in the past (Buchrieser et al., 2000; Beloin and Dorman, 2003; Ayala et al., 2015a). In the case of S. flexneri, the majority of the virulence genes are carried on a large plasmid that is a genetic mosaic made from precursor plasmids and transposable elements (Buchrieser et al., 2000; Dorman, 2009) while many prominent virulence genes in V. cholerae are found on pathogenicity islands (Karaolis et al., 1998, 1999; Faruque et al., 2003) or in a filamentous bacteriophage (Waldor and Mekalanos, 1996). These features are explored in the following sections.

S. flexneri Has Plasmid-Based Virulence Genes

Shigella flexneri uses a T3SS to inject effector proteins into host cells that produce the alterations to the actin cytoskeleton that are a characteristic of the invasive disease. Other virulence proteins help to create the actin comet tails that generate the movement of the bacteria through the host cytoplasm. Most of the principal T3SS-associated virulence genes are located on a large (213 kbp) plasmid called pINV, with those involved in the production of the T3SS being grouped in a so-called Entry Region (Figure 2) that is actually a pathogenicity island (Buchrieser et al., 2000; Lan et al., 2001; Dorman, 2009). The plasmid is capable of integrating into the chromosome, where expression of the virulence genes is silenced (Zagaglia et al., 1991; Colonna et al., 1995; Pilla et al., 2017). As virulence gene expression on the plasmid has been associated with its structural and genetic instability (Schuch and Maurelli, 1997), integration accompanied by silencing may be a strategy to ensure the vertical transmission of the virulence plasmid with the genes intact. Post-segregational killing by pINV-encoded toxin/anti-toxin systems also favors maintenance of the autonomously replicating plasmid by eliminating any plasmid-free cells that arise at cell division (Pilla et al., 2017; Pilla and Tang, 2018). The S. flexneri virulence plasmid is not self-transmissible (Sansonetti et al., 1982) but it contains genes encoding remnants of a tra transfer apparatus, suggesting that it has evolved from precursor plasmids that were mobile (Buchrieser et al., 2000). Although horizontal gene transfer via a mobile genetic element is not currently a feature of S. flexneri pathogenesis, it is central to that of V. cholerae.

FIGURE 2

The Genes for Cholera Toxin Are on a Bacteriophage

The CT has an A₁B₅ structure and is encoded by the ctxAB operon (De Haan and Hirst, 2004). This operon is part of the CTXϕ filamentous phage genome (Waldor and Mekalanos, 1996) that usually inserts itself at the dif site on the larger chromosome of V. cholerae using the bacterial XerCD site-specific recombination system to catalyze insertion (Huber and Waldor, 2002; McLeod and Waldor, 2004; Das et al., 2013). Insertion is catalyzed by XerC alone and follows a pathway in which the plus strand of the virus genome is integrated and the complementary strand is generated by DNA replication (Val et al., 2005). V. cholerae has two chromosomes, with the smaller, second chromosome having many of the characteristics of a large plasmid (Val et al., 2016). This is interesting in the context of the comparison with S. flexneri, where the principal virulence genes are found on a large plasmid that replicates independently of the chromosome, almost like a mini-chromosome dedicated to causing disease. This S. flexneri plasmid is actually a mosaic of up to four plasmids and it has two functioning and one vestigial plasmid partition system (Buchrieser et al., 2000; Pilla and Tang, 2018). In an interesting example of the rather ad hoc and modular nature of bacterial gene control circuits, the VirB protein from the vestigial plasmid partitioning system has been integrated into the circuit that governs expression of the Shigella virulence phenotype (Adler et al., 1989; Watanabe et al., 1990; Taniya et al., 2003; Turner and Dorman, 2007).

Transcription of the ctxAB operon is under multifactorial control in response to a range of environmental signals (Figure 3). Among the agents of control is the H-NS nucleoid-associated protein, a DNA binding protein that is a silencer of transcription (Nye et al., 2000; Nye and Taylor, 2003; Stonehouse et al., 2011). H-NS has a preference for binding to A + T-rich DNA sequences and these are frequently a feature of genes that have been acquired by horizontal transfer. Since the ctxAB operon is part of an active bacteriophage, it is de facto a genetic element that is acquired in this way. H-NS has been studied best in the model organisms Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica (Dorman, 2007). In V. cholerae, H-NS is also known as VicH, and it has approximately 50% amino acid sequence identity with its functional ortholog in E. coli (Tendeng et al., 2000; Cerdan et al., 2003). H-NS is a DNA bridging protein that also has the ability to polymerize along DNA, excluding other proteins (Dame et al., 2006; Dorman, 2007). Relief of H-NS-mediated transcription silencing can be achieved through myriad mechanisms (Stoebel et al., 2008; Dorman and Kane, 2009; Will et al., 2015). Several of these involve the intervention of other DNA binding proteins that antagonize the transcriptionally repressive activity of H-NS. In the case of the ctxAB operon, the ToxR protein binds to DNA using a wHTH and is an important H-NS antagonist. In fact, the primary biological function of ToxR appears to be opposition to the transcriptional silencing activity of H-NS (Kazi et al., 2016). ToxR appears to have relatively relaxed requirements for its DNA binding sites at the level of nucleotide sequence (Higgins and DiRita, 1996), possibly operating primarily via an indirect readout mechanism that relies on DNA shape (Dorman and Dorman, 2017). Among its most important regulatory targets is the toxT gene (Figure 3). The principal features of the ToxT regulatory protein are described in the following section.

FIGURE 3

The V. cholerae AraC-Like ToxT Protein

ToxT is an AraC-like protein that binds to DNA using two HTH motifs, making it a member of a large family of bacterial transcription factors (Egan, 2002; Li et al., 2016). The toxT gene is located in VPI-1, a horizontally acquired genetic element that harbors many virulence genes (Karaolis et al., 1998, 1999; Faruque et al., 2003) (Figure 3). Prominent among these are the genes that encode the surface-expressed TCP. Here, the toxin in question is CT, with TCP playing an important role in the acquisition of CTXϕ by acting as the receptor for this filamentous phage (Waldor and Mekalanos, 1996) as well as being an important surface factor for autoaggregation and microcolony formation on the lining of the human gut (Taylor et al., 1987; Lim et al., 2010). Since TCP serves as the CTXϕ receptor, possession of VPI-1 is therefore necessary for V. cholerae to be lysogenised by CTXϕ and to become toxigenic. Given the patterns of CT and TCP production and their linked functions in the pathogenesis of V. cholerae, coordinated regulation of their respective genes is not unexpected. This coordination is achieved, in part, by the ToxT protein (DiRita et al., 1991; Higgins et al., 1992; Champion et al., 1997), which also regulates the transcription of its own gene (Brown and Taylor, 1995; Yu and DiRita, 1999) (Figure 3).

Like many AraC-like proteins, ToxT consists of two functional domains: its DNA binding domain is in the C-terminus of the protein and a ligand-binding domain and the dimerization functions are located in the N-terminus (Lowden et al., 2010). ToxT function is modulated by bile (Schuhmacher and Klose, 1999; Chatterjee et al., 2007) and oleic fatty acids are a component of bile; interestingly, cis-palmitoleic acid has been shown to bind to the N-terminus of ToxT in its crystallized form (Lowden et al., 2010). ToxT plays a dual role in transcription regulation, acting as an anti-repressor that overcomes gene silencing by H-NS as well as serving as a conventional transcription factor by recruiting RNA polymerase to target promoters (Yu and DiRita, 2002). The DNA sequences that are targeted by ToxT are A + T-rich, a feature that is shared by H-NS binding sites, making the two proteins natural antagonists. The ToxT protein binds to the promoter region of the CT operon and activates its transcription; the same operon is silenced by H-NS (Yu and DiRita, 2002; Stonehouse et al., 2011). ToxT is regarded as the primary protein regulator of ctxAB transcription, although ToxR can also play a role independently of ToxT under some growth conditions, e.g., when bile salts are present (Hung and Mekalanos, 2005) (Figure 3). ToxR was recognized early on as a central regulator of virulence gene expression in V. cholerae, transmitting information about the composition of the external environment to its target genes (Miller et al., 1987). It has become clear that ToxR is part of a much more complex regulatory cascade with the toxT gene as one of its key targets (see the following section).

The ToxRS/TcpPH Partnership in V. cholerae

The ToxRS/TcpPH regulatory protein partnership transmits information about growth medium composition, pH, osmolarity, and temperature to the V. cholerae virulence regulon (Taylor et al., 1987; Miller and Mekalanos, 1988; Peterson and Mekalanos, 1988; Thomas et al., 1995; Carroll et al., 1997). ToxR is a cytoplasmic-membrane-associated DNA binding protein that exists in a complex with ToxS, another transmembrane protein (Ottemann and Mekalanos, 1996). The genes that encode these two proteins form an operon that is a component of the core genome of V. cholerae and is expressed constitutively (Miller et al., 1989). The N-terminus of the ToxR protein contains the wHTH DNA binding domain while the C-terminus is located in the periplasm of the bacterium (Miller et al., 1987; DiRita and Mekalanos, 1991). It was noticed early on that ToxR forms either ToxR–ToxR homodimers or ToxR-ToxS heterodimers (Ottemann and Mekalanos, 1996). ToxR undergoes regulated intramembrane proteolytic degradation and is protected from this by ToxS and by an intramolecular disulphide bond between two cysteines in the ToxR periplasmic domain (Fengler et al., 2012; Midgett et al., 2017). Exposure to bile salts or other detergents enhances ToxR–ToxS contact and increases the influence of ToxR on gene expression: the stability of ToxR declines as the bacterium makes its immediate environment more alkaline in stationary phase, disrupting ToxR’s protective interaction with the ToxS protein (Midgett et al., 2017).

Paralogous counterparts to ToxR and ToxS, known as TcpP and TcpH, are encoded by genes on VPI-1 (Figure 3). The AphA and AphB transcription factors, encoded by the ancestral part of the genome, act cooperatively at the tcpPH promoter to activate transcription (Kovacikova and Skorupski, 2001). The cAMP-Crp complex also regulates this promoter (Kovacikova and Skorupski, 2001). TcpP and TcpH form a regulatory complex that is analogous to the ToxRS one, and they also regulate the transcription of the toxT gene (Häse and Mekalanos, 1998; Krukonis et al., 2000). Like ToxR, the TcpP transcriptional activator is subject to regulated intramembrane proteolysis, making it unstable (Teoh et al., 2015). Its TcpH partner protects TcpP from such degradation (Beck et al., 2004). The presence of a disulphide bond within the periplasmic domain of TcpP is important for the protection of both TcpP and TcpH from degradation (Morgan et al., 2015).

ToxR and TcpP cooperate in the positive regulation of toxT (Morgan et al., 2011) and single-molecule-tracking experiments show that ToxR recruits TcpP to the toxT promoter (Haas et al., 2015) (Figure 3). The two proteins make contact through wing-wing interactions in their wHTH DNA binding domains (Krukonis and DiRita, 2003; Goss et al., 2010). Once ToxT is produced, it activates the other genes in its regulon, including the genes for the TCP, the accessory colonization factor (ACF), aldehyde dehydrogenase, and the CT operon itself (DiRita et al., 1991). ToxT also induces the production of the small regulatory RNA TarB, encoded within the tcp gene cluster (Figure 3). When made stable by the Hfq RNA chaperone, TarB down-regulates the VspR transcription repressor resulting in derepression of virulence genes in the Vibrio seventh pandemic pathogenicity island VSP-1 in 7PET V. cholerae (Davies et al., 2012). The expression of these genes produces increased intracellular concentrations of signaling molecules such as cyclic-GMP/cyclic-AMP and possibly c-di-GMP/c-di-AMP, altering the metabolism of the bacterium and its chemotactic behavior (Davies et al., 2012; Dorman, 2015; Severin et al., 2018) (Figure 3). TarB also post-transcriptionally down-regulates TcpF production from VPI-1: here, Hfq does not seem to be required and the production of the sRNA is enhanced during anaerobic growth (Bradley et al., 2011) (Figure 3).

H-NS plays an important role in the control of gene expression in the context of adaptation to environments outside the human host (Ayala et al., 2017) (Figure 3). It is also required for V. cholerae motility (Ghosh et al., 2006; Silva et al., 2008). Apart from the ctxAB operon, most of the genes that are silenced by H-NS are located in VPI-1 on chromosome I and in a 125-kb super-integron located on chromosome II; others include the hlyA hemolysin/cytolysin, the vas major type VI secretion operon and the vps-rbm biofilm and chitin utilization genes (Ayala et al., 2015a,b; Wang et al., 2015; Zamorano-Sánchez et al., 2015; Kazi et al., 2016) (Figures 3–5).

The AphA AphB Regulon

AphA is a wHTH transcription factor (De Silva et al., 2005) that assists the LysR-like protein AphB to bind to the tcpPH promoter (Kovacikova and Skorupski, 2001; Kovacikova et al., 2004) (Figure 3). AphA represses the transcription of the V. cholerae genes that synthesize acetoin and hence helps to manage the pH of the bacterial cytoplasm (Kovacikova et al., 2005). AphA activates the expression of the gene encoding VpsT, a LuxR-like biofilm regulator of biofilm formation (Yang et al., 2010) (Figure 3). The VpsR regulatory protein activates production of VpsT in the presence of high c-di-GMP; VpsR also activates the gene encoding AphA under these conditions (Ayala et al., 2015a,b; Dorman, 2015; Zamorano-Sánchez et al., 2015) (Figure 3). These VpsR/T-AphA connections link the virulence and biofilm gene clusters intimately at the level of cross regulation.

HapR, the chief quorum-sensing regulator of V. cholerae, is known to repress the transcription of the tcpPH gene and hence the virulence regulon (Zhu et al., 2002). HapR binds to, and represses, the aphA promoter when the bacterial culture is at high density, preventing activation of tcpPH by AphA (Kovacikova and Skorupski, 2002; Kovacikova et al., 2003). This link makes the virulence cascade responsive to quorum sensing (Figures 3, 4). The HapR and AphA proteins play reciprocal roles in the response of V. cholerae to cell density: AphA operates at low cell density and HapR takes over the role of master regulator at high cell density. At low cell density, AphA production is upregulated by sRNAs and then AphA and Hfq-dependent sRNAs repress production of HapR (Lenz et al., 2005; Lenz and Bassler, 2007; Rutherford et al., 2011; Basu et al., 2017) (Figure 4). These (redundant) sRNA molecules are four Quorum Regulatory RNAs (Qrr) and they act with Hfq to repress production of HapR. In parallel, the production of the CsrB, CsrC, and CsrD sRNAs (also redundant) is under the control of the V. cholerae two-component system VsrS/VsrA (Lenz et al., 2005) (Figure 4). These Csr sRNAs act on the CsrA global regulatory protein to activate production of the Qrr sRNAs via the LuxO quorum-sensing protein, in an RpoN-dependent manner (Lenz et al., 2005). At high cell density, HapR acts at aphA by antagonizing its activation by the leucine-responsive regulatory protein, Lrp, and the NtrC-like biofilm regulator, VpsR (Lin et al., 2007) (Figure 3). In Shigella, CsrA has a poorly defined impact on the virulence phenotype through effects on expression of the virF and virB regulatory genes, implicating carbon metabolism as an important determinant of Shigella virulence (Gore and Payne, 2010). Quorum sensing seems to play a role in production of the S. flexneri T3SS, affecting in particular expression of the virB regulatory gene. T3SS production is maximal in cells entering the stationary phase of growth, a stage when bacterial cell density is maximal during growth in laboratory culture. However, the details of the signaling cascade remain obscure (Day and Maurelli, 2001).

FIGURE 4

AphB plays an important role in V. cholerae pH homeostasis by regulating, among other genes, the expression of cadC (Kovacikova et al., 2010). The CadC protein shares with ToxR and TcpP the properties of being a cytoplasmic-membrane-associated transcription regulator (Merrell and Camilli, 2000). Among its targets is the cadBA operon encoding a lysine decarboxylase (CadA) and a lysine/cadaverine antiporter (CadB). CadA converts lysine to cadaverine and CadB transports cadaverine out of the cell, exchanging it for lysine (Merrell and Camilli, 1999). Interestingly, cadA has been identified as an anti-virulence gene that is deleted in Shigella species: it has been suggested that since cadaverine inhibits Shigella enterotoxin activity, loss of cadA by deletion enhances the virulence of the pathogen (Maurelli et al., 1998).

The cadC gene in El Tor V. cholerae is repressed by the LysR-like wHTH transcription factor LeuO (Ante et al., 2015a), a protein with wide-ranging effects on transcription in Gram-negative bacteria (Shimada et al., 2011; Dillon et al., 2012; Guadarrama et al., 2014; Dorman and Dorman, 2017). ToxR derepresses the H-NS-silenced leuO gene (Bina et al., 2016) and it also mediates the transcription of ompU, a gene encoding an outer membrane porin that confers resistance to bile stress (Ante et al., 2015b) (Figure 3). LeuO represses the carRS operon that controls the remodeling of lipid A for the elaboration of cationic antimicrobial peptide resistance (Bina et al., 2016). In classical strains of V. cholerae, LeuO is a co-repressor, with H-NS of vieSAB transcription, an operon that modulates biofilm formation and cell motility (Ayala et al., 2018). In contrast, El Tor biotype strains produce very little LeuO. The vieSAB operon is almost silent in the El Tor biotype due to repression by the quorum-sensing regulator, HapR, a protein that is reported to be absent from classical biotype strains (Wang et al., 2015). The emerging picture is one in which H-NS and LeuO cooperate to repress vieSAB in classical strains and H-NS and HapR achieve the corresponding effect in El Tor organisms (Ayala et al., 2018). Consistent with this role, leuO mutants exhibit reduced levels of biofilm production (Moorthy and Watnick, 2005). LeuO, whose production is enhanced by ToxR, feeds back negatively onto aphA transcription, leading to downregulation of the ToxR regulon with reductions in CT and TCP production (Figure 3). The signal for the ToxR enhanced transcription of leuO is cyclo(Phe-Pro) (Bina et al., 2013).

Signals Affecting CT Production: Role of the Stringent Response

AphB has also been linked to the anaerobic response in V. cholerae (Kovacikova et al., 2010). Its dimerization and activity in regulating the expression of tcpPH are enhanced by anaerobiosis. A cysteine amino acid has been shown to be essential for the anaerobic enhancement, indicating that AphB uses a thiol-based switch to respond to oxygen limitation (Liu et al., 2011). Anaerobiosis and the stringent response are linked in enhancing the production of CT (Lee et al., 2012). When grown anaerobically using trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) as a terminal electron acceptor, V. cholerae exhibits enhanced production of CT. The bacteria also produce the alarmone guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp) whereas mutants deficient in ppGpp production are also impaired in CT production. Similarly, mutants lacking DksA, the protein that works synergistically with ppGpp at RNA polymerase, are also impaired in CT production (Oh et al., 2014). The stringent response is a global reaction to nutritional stress that is usually triggered by an accumulation of uncharged tRNAs that indicate a shortage of one or more amino acids. Bacteria experiencing the stringent response accumulate ppGpp and reprogramme RNA polymerase so that genes expressing components of the translational machinery are downregulated. The enzyme RelA produces pppGpp from ATP and GTP and then converts it to ppGpp; SpoT hydrolyses ppGpp (although SpoT has a synthesis role too) (Dalebroux et al., 2010; Dalebroux and Swanson, 2012). In V. cholerae the RelV enzyme synthesizes ppGpp in the absence of RelA and SpoT when the bacterium is experiencing glucose or fatty acid starvation (Das et al., 2009). All three synthases are involved in regulating V. cholerae biofilm production: vpsR transcription requires all three while vpsT requires RelA (He et al., 2012). V. cholerae also has a GTP-binding protein called CgtA that modulates the function of SpoT, repressing the stringent response by keeping ppGpp levels low (Raskin et al., 2007). DksA regulates the production of the hemagglutinin/protease (HAP) that is involved in the shedding stage of the V. cholerae infection (Basu et al., 2017). HAP production is controlled by HapR and RpoS with DksA controlling HapR production positively at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. The post-transcriptional regulation involves Fis-dependent Quorum Regulatory RNAs (Qrr) sRNAs and the levels of these regulatory RNA molecules are strongly reduced in the absence of DksA (Lenz et al., 2005; Lenz and Bassler, 2007). Furthermore, DksA is required for normal levels of RpoS production in stationary phase V. cholerae cells (Basu et al., 2017). The counterpart to CgtA in E. coli (and Shigella) is the evolutionarily highly conserved Obg GTPase (Dewachter et al., 2016). Obg has been described as a cell cycle protein that can arrest chromosome replication, a factor required for stress response and for ribosome assembly. In association with ppGpp it determines persistence through the stochastic induction of a state of dormancy and antibiotic tolerance during periods of nutrient stress (Verstraeten et al., 2015; Gkekas et al., 2017). In S. flexneri, the DksA protein and ppGpp are required for production of the Hfq RNA chaperone (Sharma and Payne, 2006) a protein that controls the level of the central virulence regulator VirB (Mitobe et al., 2008, 2009). Loss of DksA impairs the intercellular spreading of S. flexneri, with dksA mutants having the IcsA protein that is required for actin-dependent motility mislocated on the cell surface (Mogull et al., 2001). The stringent response operates by reprogramming the activity of RNA polymerase in response to amino acid starvation. RNA polymerase is also reprogrammed in response to stress by the replacement of the housekeeping sigma factor RpoD by a stress-specific sigma factor, with RpoS being a prominent example.

General Response to Stress and the Role of the RpoS Sigma Factor

Many commensal and pathogenic bacteria respond to stress and/or the cessation of growth by reprogramming RNA polymerase by replacing the RpoD sigma factor with RpoS (Klauck et al., 2007; Schellhorn, 2014). The role of the RpoS sigma factor in the expression of virulence has been investigated more intensively in V. cholerae than in S. flexneri. In S. flexneri, much of the focus has been on the link between RpoS and resistance to low pH stress. The discovery that Shigella and some pathogenic E. coli strains have a regulator called IraL that stabilizes RpoS in the absence of stress may reveal infection-related RpoS roles in Shigella that have yet to be explored (Hryckowian et al., 2014). In terms of where RpoS sits in the V. cholerae regulatory hierarchy, it is useful to note that transcription silencing by H-NS may be less effective in V. cholerae at RpoS-dependent promoters (Wang et al., 2012), although it is not clear if this is an entirely due to an intrinsic property of the RpoS sigma factor or if some other feature, such as the topology of the promoter DNA during periods of RpoS availability, might play a role. Also, RpoS in V. cholerae enhances the production of IHF, with knock-on effects for IHF-dependent processes (Wang et al., 2012). Early work with V. cholerae showed that loss of RpoS production makes the bacterium sensitive to a variety of environmental stresses in vitro (Yildiz and Schoolnik, 1998) and interferes with its ability to colonize the mouse small intestine (Merrell et al., 2000). The sigma factor is also involved in the latter stages of infection when the bacterium detaches from the epithelial surface. Here, the so-called mucosal escape step requires RpoS with the sigma factor contributing to the expression of genes involved in motility and chemotaxis, functions that are important for the subsequent dispersal of the pathogen (Nielsen et al., 2006; Ringgaard et al., 2015). Motility genes have a complex relationship with the virulence phenotype, with mutants deficient in specific flagellar hierarchy regulators displaying altered production of virulence factors including CT, TCP and the T6SS (Syed et al., 2009). V. cholerae’s re-entry to an aquatic environment may also be RpoS-dependent. The sigma factor is required for the production of the chitinase that renders V. cholerae both competent for the uptake of foreign DNA and which is needed for the growth of the bacterium on otherwise insoluble chitin (Dalia, 2016). This RpoS-competence link is independent of any quorum-sensing link to natural transformation by foreign DNA (Dalia, 2016). HapR and quorum sensing have been reported to enhance the production of RpoS (Joelsson et al., 2007) and RpoS plays a positive role in the expression of the HapR-dependent V. cholerae hapA gene, encoding a hemagglutinin/protease (Silva and Benitez, 2004) (Figure 4). This enzyme plays an important part in the bacterial shedding phase that occurs toward the end of the infection (Basu et al., 2017). Transcription of the rpoS gene is repressed by the VpsT transcription factor, in association with the second messenger cyclic-di-GMP, when V. cholerae is within biofilm (Wang et al., 2014) (Figure 5). While it has been appreciated for some time that RpoS (and quorum sensing) are important influences in determining entry into a biofilm, it is now becoming clear that RpoS and quorum sensing are also important for V. cholerae dispersion from biofilm (Singh et al., 2017).

FIGURE 5

Chitin and Gene Regulation in V. cholerae

Chitin transport and metabolism depend on the chb operon in V. cholerae. The cell division protein SlmA binds to chb and regulates its expression, possibly in association with an unknown transcription factor that is under the control of the ChiS sensor-kinase (Klancher et al., 2017). Cbp is a periplasmic chitin binding protein that regulates ChiS negatively when chitin is absent; binding chitin by Cbp relieves repression (Li and Roseman, 2004) (Figure 6). TfoS is an independent chitin sensor that activates the transcription of the tfoR gene that encodes an sRNA, TfoR (Dalia et al., 2014; Yamamoto et al., 2014). This Hfq-dependent sRNA positively controls the translation of tfoX mRNA with the TfoX protein, in turn, activating genes involved in foreign DNA uptake in competent cells (Yamamoto et al., 2011) (Figure 6). The tfoX gene is also regulated at the level of transcription by the cAMP-Crp complex (Wu et al., 2015). This is consistent with the roles of cAMP-Crp and chitin in the establishment of competence in Vibrio spp. (Blokesch, 2012). Chitin makes V. cholerae competent for DNA uptake by transformation, allowing it to influence the evolution of the bacterium by horizontal gene transfer (Meibom et al., 2005; Le Roux and Blokesch, 2018). The fate of DNA taken up by V. cholerae that has been made competent by chitin depends on cell density and quorum sensing. At low cell density the HapR regulator is present in low abundance, allowing the Dns nuclease to accumulate and to degrade the incoming DNA extracellularly or in the periplasm (Blokesch and Schoolnik, 2008; Seitz and Blokesch, 2014). At high cell density, HapR is abundant and production of the nuclease is repressed. Under these conditions the TfoX-dependent competence system imports the DNA (Seitz and Blokesch, 2013) (Figure 6). In addition to its roles in controlling competence, the cAMP-Crp complex also controls the virulence regulon at the tcpPH promoter (Kovacikova and Skorupski, 2001) and both the integrase gene promoter and the main promoter for gene cassette transcription in the superintegron found on chromosome II of V. cholerae (Krin et al., 2014). The gene that encodes the outer membrane porin protein OmpT requires cAMP-Crp for expression; ompT is the only member of the ToxR regulon known to be repressed by ToxR and it acts by disrupting the positive influence of the cAMP-Crp complex at the ompT promoter (Caiyi et al., 2002).

FIGURE 6

Gene Silencing and Anti-Silencing in S. flexneri

The H-NS protein plays a general role in silencing transcription throughout the virulence regulon of S. flexneri (and enteroinvasive E. coli) (Dorman et al., 2001; Beloin and Dorman, 2003) (Figure 7). Like the V. cholerae system, the S. flexneri regulon uses an AraC-like protein to overcome H-NS-mediated transcription silencing (Dorman, 1992; Porter and Dorman, 2002). The VirF protein performs approximately an equivalent role to ToxT and is encoded by virF, a regulatory gene on the virulence plasmid that lies outside the Entry Region (Adler et al., 1989; Porter and Dorman, 1997b, 2002; Di Martino et al., 2016a). It is closely related to the Rns protein of enterotoxigenic E. coli and the two proteins are at least partly functionally interchangeable (Porter et al., 1998). Transcription activation of virF involves a complicated process in which H-NS-mediated silencing is overcome by an adjustment to the local DNA structure at the virF promoter (Stoebel et al., 2008). This adjustment is triggered by a shift in temperature to 37°C from a lower value. This temperature is one of the environmental signals, along with appropriate values of pH and osmolarity that are characteristic of the human intestine (Di Martino et al., 2016a). It involves a change in the bend angle of a region of A + T-rich DNA that widens the space between the arms of the bend, possibly compromising the integrity of a DNA-H-NS-DNA bridge, an event that is exacerbated by a displacement of the center of the bend that disrupts the parallel placement of the DNA bend arms (Prosseda et al., 2004). This remodeling event does not require the intervention of proteins, although the Fis and IHF nucleoid-associated proteins play a positive role in virF transcription activation and the VirB protein also makes a direct and positive contribution (Porter and Dorman, 1997a; Prosseda et al., 2004; Kane and Dorman, 2012). DNA remodeling to activate virF transcription is consistent with the known role of DNA negative supercoiling in modulating the expression both of virF (Durand et al., 2000) and the wider S. flexneri virulence system (Dorman et al., 1990; Ni Bhriain and Dorman, 1993; Dorman, 1995; McNairn et al., 1995). There is also a positive regulatory role for the CpxA/CpxR two-component system (that transmits information about ambient pH) in the activation of virF expression (Nakayama and Watanabe, 1995, 1998; Marman et al., 2014). CpxA has also been described as influencing positively the stability of invE/virB mRNA (Mitobe et al., 2005).

FIGURE 7

Control of VirF Production in S. flexneri

The virF transcript is translated into two proteins: a major form known as VirF₃₀ (which has a molecular mass of 30 kDa) and VirF₂₁, lacking the N-terminal segment of the full-length protein (Di Martino et al., 2016b). While VirF₃₀ is responsible for the activation of the virulence regulon, VirF₂₁ is a negative autoregulator of virF expression. The shorter protein is translated from a leaderless mRNA called llmRNA that is transcribed from a separate promoter that is internal to virF: the function of VirF₂₁ may be to restrict production of VirF to environments where S. flexneri will benefit from expression of the full virulence regulon (Di Martino et al., 2016b). Production of the VirF protein is reduced in mutants with deficiencies in tRNA modification: specifically in miaA and tgt mutants (Durand et al., 2000). This reduction in VirF production has a negative impact on S. flexneri virulence and results from poor translation of the virF mRNA. This negative effect can be offset by the presence of methionine and arginine in combination, or by adding putrescine to the growth medium (Durand and Björk, 2003). These observations indicate the extent to which VirF production is keyed into central metabolism in S. flexneri.

A striking feature of the S. flexneri virulence gene regulatory cascade is that VirF does not regulate all of the main structural genes directly. Its direct influence is restricted to the ‘intracellular spread’ gene icsA (also known as virG) a small RNA antagonist of icsA transcription called RnaG, and to an intermediate regulatory gene called virB. The H-NS protein silences each of these genes (Tran et al., 2011) (Figure 7). The icsA gene product is localized to one of the poles of the S. flexneri cell where it promotes the polymerization of actin that, in turn, creates the characteristic comet-tail-like structures that propel the bacterium through the host cell cytoplasm (Suzuki et al., 1996, 1998).

The Unusual VirB Regulatory Protein in S. flexneri

The virB gene, known as invE in S. sonnei (Watanabe et al., 1990), encodes a protein with strong amino acid sequence similarity to plasmid segregation proteins of the ParB family (Adler et al., 1989; Beloin et al., 2002; McKenna et al., 2003; Taniya et al., 2003; Turner and Dorman, 2007). VirB acts between VirF and most of the virulence gene promoters of the S. flexneri virulence regulon, carrying out the role of an intermediate regulator (Figure 7). VirB has a requirement for a specific parS-like DNA sequence at its binding sites and its mode of action consists of remodeling H-NS-DNA complexes to eliminate the transcription silencing activity of the H-NS protein (Taniya et al., 2003; Turner and Dorman, 2007). The icsB gene is first in an operon that encodes components of the S. flexneri T3SS and it is silenced by H-NS (Beloin and Dorman, 2003). The counter-silencing mechanism used at the icsB promoter seems to consist of a combination of DNA wrapping and VirB protein polymerization (Turner and Dorman, 2007). VirB antagonism of H-NS-mediated silencing can act over considerable distances, as at the icsP promoter (Castellanos et al., 2009). The IcsP (SopA) protein is a protease that deactivates IcsA, the cell-pole-located actin-tail-polymerizing protein (Fukuda et al., 1995; d’Hauteville et al., 1996; Shere et al., 1997; Wing et al., 2004). The icsP promoter is silenced by H-NS and VirB acts there as an anti-repressor; contact between the counteracting proteins may involve DNA dependent protein polymerization in vivo (Weatherspoon-Griffin et al., 2018). The ospZ promoter is also controlled by a VirB/H-NS-dependent silencing/anti-silencing mechanism (Basta et al., 2013). The OspZ protein is secreted by the S. flexneri T3SS to manipulate the host inflammatory response (Zurawski et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2016). The ospZ gene is located immediately upstream of icsP and is transcribed in the opposite direction. The two genes share important cis-acting regulatory sites that are targets for VirB when acting in its capacity as an anti-repressor (Basta et al., 2013). A similar arrangement is found between the icsB and ipgD genes whose promoters are silenced by H-NS and derepressed by VirB (Porter and Dorman, 1997a; Taniya et al., 2003; Turner and Dorman, 2007).

Early work showed that the virB gene is repressed by H-NS and regulated positively by VirF (Tobe et al., 1993) (Figure 7). Although the activation of virB transcription depends on the presence of VirF, the presence of this AraC-like protein is not sufficient: a temperature of 37°C is also required. This thermal requirement can be dispensed with if the topology of the DNA in the vicinity of the virB promoter is manipulated appropriately, an observation that supports a model in which the positive role of VirF is contingent on the conformation of the DNA on which it acts (Tobe et al., 1995). Consistent with this hypothesis is the finding that negative DNA supercoils, generated by a divergently transcribing promoter, activate the virB promoter in the presence of VirF at the normally non-permissive temperature of 30°C (Tobe et al., 1995). The virF and virB genes represent the principal sites for thermal sensing in the S. flexneri virulence gene cascade. Once the VirB protein is produced, the genes under its control will be derepressed as H-NS-mediated transcription silencing is progressively relieved. This can be shown by producing the VirB protein ectopically, e.g., using an arabinose-inducible promoter in bacteria growing at 30°C, a temperature that is normally non-permissive for expression of the virulence regulon. Here, the level of transcription of the virulence genes corresponds to the level of arabinose-induced VirB protein that is present in the cell (Beloin and Dorman, 2003). The virB/invE transcript becomes unstable at 30°C (Mitobe et al., 2008) or if the osmolarity of the growth medium declines (Mitobe et al., 2009). Like temperature, osmotic pressure is an important signal for full activation of the virulence system (Porter and Dorman, 1994). In both cases, virB mRNA turnover is dependent on the RNA chaperone Hfq (Mitobe et al., 2008, 2009). These findings indicate that down-regulation of virB gene expression involves rapid turnover of the mRNA when growth conditions no longer correspond to those found in the human large intestine.

The similarity of the VirB protein to ParB-like plasmid partitioning proteins and the similarity between the binding site in DNA used by VirB and those used by ParB-like proteins (parS) suggests that the VirB protein is a vestige of a mechanism that was concerned with plasmid segregation and that VirB has been co-opted into gene regulation (Adler et al., 1989; Taniya et al., 2003; Turner and Dorman, 2007). The utility of VirB as a general antagonist of transcriptional silencing mediated by H-NS has been shown by using it to overcome silencing by H-NS of the proU operon (Kane and Dorman, 2011). The proU operon encodes a transport system for the osmo-protectants glycine-betaine and proline and is not normally controlled by VirB (Ref for ProU). However, judicial placement at the proU promoter of the parS-like binding site used by VirB at the S. flexneri icsB promoter brings proU under VirB control. This simple experiment demonstrates the modular nature of gene control mechanisms based on H-NS silencing and anti-silencing and illustrates the ease with which novel systems might evolve in nature.

The VirB protein forms a positive feedback loop onto its own gene’s expression and onto that of the virF gene (Kane and Dorman, 2012) (Figure 7). This may facilitate reinforcement of the transition from the ‘off’ to the ‘on’ state once a commitment to expressing the virulence cascade is made. An examination of the fold-induction of the virulence regulon in response to the thermal signal reveals a gearing effect, with virF showing the narrowest range of transcription between its induced and non-induced states, the major virulence operons having the widest range and virB has an induction ratio with an intermediate value (Porter and Dorman, 1997a). The imposition of additional regulatory signals and regulators may help to restrict full production of the T3SS and its effector proteins to circumstances when the bacterium is most likely to benefit from the physiological investment. This is consistent with findings that reveal roles for post-transcriptional control in the system, such as the phenotypes associated with mutants deficient in tgt or miaA (Durand and Björk, 2003). The translation control factors elongation factor P (EF-P) and the enzyme that modifies it (PoxA) are also needed for expression of a full virulence phenotype (Marman et al., 2014). It has been suggested that the stability of virB mRNA is influenced through interaction with the cytoplasmic-membrane-associated RodZ protein, a determinant of bacterial cell morphology (Mitobe et al., 2011). Other examples of additional control include the sRNA known as RnaG (Tran et al., 2011), the MxiE AraC-like transcription factor, the FNR anaerobic regulator (Marteyn et al., 2010; Vergara-Irigaray et al., 2014), the Rho transcription termination factor (Tobe et al., 1994), the Hfq RNA chaperone (Mitobe et al., 2008, 2009) and the osmo-regulatory OmpR/EnvZ two-component regulatory system (Bernardini et al., 1990, 1993).

Additional Virulence Regulators in S. flexneri

The role of the OmpR/EnvZ system in virulence gene expression seems to be restricted to conditions of high osmolarity growth, but precise molecular details are lacking (Bernardini et al., 1990). The gene encoding the OmpC outer membrane porin is known to require OmpR for expression and has been shown to be required for full virulence, but the ompC gene is part of the core genome and is located on the S. flexneri chromosome (Bernardini et al., 1993). The possibility that OmpR is involved in the pH response of the Shigella virulence system does not seem to have been investigated: OmpR plays such a role in controlling the transcription of T3SS genes in the facultative intracellular pathogen Salmonella (Quinn et al., 2014; Chakraborty et al., 2017).

MxiE is encoded by a gene in the Entry Region of the virulence plasmid and plays a role late in the program of virulence gene expression (Kane et al., 2002) (Figures 1, 7). MxiE is an AraC-like transcription factor that operates in partnership with the co-activator IpgC (Pilonieta and Munson, 2008). The IpgC protein is also a chaperone of the IpaB and IpaC effector proteins. MxiE binds to a 17-bp ‘MxiE box’ and regulates several virulence genes on the plasmid and may have targets on the chromosome too (Mavris et al., 2002; Bongrand et al., 2012). Transcriptional slippage by RNA polymerase that introduces an additional base into the MxiE mRNA is required for the production of full-length MxiE protein. The slippage event (and the associated translational frameshift) occurs in about 30% of cases and may represent an additional level of control over mxiE gene expression (Penno et al., 2005). This arrangement also influences the efficiency of expression of the immediately-downstream-and-overlapping mxiD gene (Penno and Parsot, 2006). Control of MxiE activity is complex and involves a number of other proteins: the anti-co-activators IpaB and IpaC oppose the positive action of the co-activator IpgC by competing with MxiE for IpgC. The anti-activator OspD1, in association with Spa15, inhibits MxiE. The secretion of these co- and anti-activators by the T3SS modulates the activity of MxiE and links its activity to different stages in the operation of the virulence system (Parsot et al., 2005).

Production of the S. flexneri T3SS is sensitive to oxygen. The oxygen-sensitive FNR protein, which is related to the cAMP receptor protein (Crp), binds to the large virulence plasmid and represses the transcription of the spa32 and spa33 genes (Figure 7). These genes control protein secretion through the T3SS. When the bacterium approaches the epithelial layer at the gut wall, a low concentration of oxygen emanating from the gut surface relieves the FNR-mediated repression, allowing invasion by the bacterium to proceed (Marteyn et al., 2010). In partnership with Fis, Crp regulates the production of the SigA toxin, a cytotoxic protease, encoded by the SHE pathogenicity island on the S. flexneri chromosome (Al-Hasani et al., 2001; Rossiter et al., 2015).

Concluding Remarks

Shigella flexneri and V. cholerae both cause diarrheal diseases in humans and both employ sophisticated mechanisms for environmental sensing and virulence gene regulation. The sites of the diseases differ in that dysentery is a disease of the lower gut while cholera affects the small intestine and the infection strategies are distinct: host cell invasion (dysentery) and gut lining intoxication (cholera). The infectious dose also differs between the two diseases, being very low for dysentery (about 10 bacterial cells) and much higher for cholera (10³ to 10⁸ bacterial cells). These distinctions are consistent with the stronger emphasis on inter-bacterial communication that characterizes V. cholerae and evidence that collectives of cells are required at the site of infection for the disease to proceed. It is also consistent with the absence from V. cholerae of an extreme acid resistance (XAR) system, a system that S. flexneri possesses. The probability that V. cholerae can establish an infection is reduced if large numbers of bacteria are killed in the low pH environment of the stomach, creating the need for a large initial inoculum when the host ingests the organisms (Lund et al., 2014). Both pathogens rely on mobile genetic elements that encode virulence factors: pathogenicity islands, a large mobilizable plasmid (dysentery) and a phage (cholera). They share a dependency on the H-NS protein to achieve transcription silencing of their virulence genes, and in the case of S. flexneri, this seems to be a strategy for stable maintenance of the genes and for transmitting them vertically. AraC-like transcription factors feature prominently in virulence gene regulation in both organisms, although V. cholerae and not S. flexneri has a dependence on regulators that are associated with the cytoplasmic membrane. In S. flexneri, the key positive regulatory genes are located on the pINV plasmid with their chief target genes; V. cholerae uses regulatory genes that are co-imported with the target genes (toxT) and others that are part of the core genome (toxR). In both species, core-genome members (e.g., Crp, Fnr) play important roles in fine-tuning the regulatory outputs, as do non-H-NS NAPs such as Fis and IHF.

The virulence gene regulatory features shared by S. flexneri and V. cholerae are also shared by other Gram-negative pathogens, making many of the points raised in this article generally relevant. Horizontal gene transfer has played an important role in the evolution of pathogenic bacteria and the H-NS protein is used widely to silence those genes (Lucchini et al., 2006; Navarre et al., 2006). The mechanisms by which the silencing is overcome in response to specific environmental signals varies from one example to another, but the underlying principle of silencing and anti-silencing of horizontally acquired genes of high A + T base content is a general feature (Stoebel et al., 2008). AraC-like proteins are widespread among Gram-negative bacteria, with many responding to thermal signals and contributing to transcription control in pathogens of mammals (Egan, 2002; Li et al., 2016). Variable DNA topology that responds to environmental stimuli is also widely reported across pathogenic species (Dorman et al., 2016), as are regulatory inputs from nucleoid-associated proteins, inputs that are not restricted to H-NS but include Fis, IHF, HU, and others (Dillon et al., 2010). The specific aspects of virulence gene control in S. flexneri and V. cholerae are many and reflect the natural histories of those organisms, their lifestyles and infection strategies. This is likely to be true in comparisons of any pathogens, even closely related ones. The general pattern described here, of shared regulatory mechanisms operating as a backdrop for individual, species-specific ones, is likely to hold true across bacteriology.

The research methods used in the field have evolved over the years from those that focus on individual genes and their cis- and trans-acting regulators to those approaches that survey events across the entire genome (Ayala et al., 2015a, 2017) or employ single-molecule methods (Haas et al., 2015). The result has been both a broader and a deeper understanding of the regulatory events in V. cholerae and S. flexneri. Whole genome sequencing is revealing important details of the epidemiology of the diseases that these pathogens cause and their evolution (Domman et al., 2017, 2018). It is anticipated that our understanding of the contributions of gene regulatory circuits to their evolution and geographical spread will become ever clearer in the near future.

References

• 1

  AdlerB.SasakawaC.TobeT.MakinoS.KomatsuK.YoshikawaM. (1989). A dual transcriptional activation system for the 230 kb plasmid genes coding for virulence-associated antigens of Shigella flexneri.Mol. Microbiol.3627–635. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1989.tb00210.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  Al-HasaniK.RajakumarK.BulachD.Robins-BrowneR.AdlerB.SakellarisH. (2001). Genetic organisation of the she pathogenicity island in Shigella flexneri 2a.Microb. Pathog.301–8. 10.1006/mpat.2000.0404

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  AnteV. M.BinaX. R.BinaJ. E. (2015a). The LysR-type regulator LeuO regulates the acid tolerance response in Vibrio cholerae.Microbiology1612434–2443. 10.1099/mic.0.000194

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  AnteV. M.BinaX. R.HowardM. F.SayeedS.TaylorD. L.BinaJ. E. (2015b). Vibrio cholerae leuO transcription is positively regulated by ToxR and contributes to bile resistance.J. Bacteriol.1973499–3510. 10.1128/JB.00419-15

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  AshidaH.MimuroH.SasakawaC. (2015). Shigella manipulates host immune responses by delivering effector proteins with specific roles.Front. Immunol.6:219. 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00219

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  AyalaJ. C.SilvaA. J.BenitezJ. A. (2017). H-NS: an overarching regulator of the Vibrio cholerae life cycle.Res. Microbiol.16816–25. 10.1016/j.resmic.2016.07.007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  AyalaJ. C.WangH.BenitezJ. A.SilvaA. J. (2015a). RNA-Seq analysis and whole genome DNA-binding profile of the histone-like nucleoid structuring protein (H-NS).Genomics Data5147–150. 10.1016/j.gdata.2015.05.039

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  AyalaJ. C.WangH.SilvaA. J.BenitezJ. A. (2015b). Repression by H-NS of genes required for the biosynthesis of the Vibrio cholerae biofilm matrix is modulated by the second messenger cyclic diguanylic acid.Mol. Microbiol.97630–645. 10.1111/mmi.13058

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  AyalaJ. C.WangH.BenitezJ. A.SilvaA. J. (2018). Molecular basis for the differential expression of the global regulator VieA in Vibrio cholerae biotypes directed by H-NS, LeuO and quorum sensing.Mol. Microbiol.107330–343. 10.1111/mmi.13884

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  BastaD. W.PewK. L.ImmakJ. A.ParkH. S.PickerM. A.WigleyA. F.et al (2013). Characterization of the ospZ promoter in Shigella flexneri and its regulation by VirB and H-NS.J. Bacteriol.1952562–2572. 10.1128/JB.00212-13.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  BasuP.PalR. R.DasguptaS.BhandraR. K. (2017). DksA-HapR-RpoS axis regulates haemagglutinin protease production in Vibrio cholerae.Microbiology163900–910. 10.1099/mic.0.000469

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  BeckN. A.KrukonisE. S.DiRitaV. J. (2004). TcpH influences virulence gene expression in Vibrio cholerae by inhibiting degradation of the transcription activator TcpP.J. Bacteriol.1868309–8316. 10.1128/JB.186.24.8309-8316.2004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  BeloinC.DormanC. J. (2003). An extended role for the nucleoid structuring protein H-NS in the virulence gene regulatory cascade of Shigella flexneri.Mol. Microbiol.47825–838. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03347.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  BeloinC.McKennaS.DormanC. J. (2002). Molecular dissection of VirB, a key regulator of the virulence cascade of Shigella flexneri.J. Biol. Chem.27715333–15344. 10.1074/jbc.M111429200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  BernardiniM. L.FontaineA.SansonettiP. J. (1990). The two-component regulatory system ompR-envZ controls the virulence of Shigella flexneri.J. Bacteriol.1726274–6281. 10.1128/jb.172.11.6274-6281.1990

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  BernardiniM. L.SannaM. G.FontaineA.SansonettiP. J. (1993). OmpC is involved in invasion of epithelial cells by Shigella flexneri.Infect. Immun.613625–3365.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  BeyhanS.TischlerA. D.CamilliA.YildizF. H. (2006). Differences in gene expression between the classical and El Tor biotypes of Vibrio cholerae O1.Infect. Immun.743633–3642. 10.1128/IAI.01750-05

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  BinaX. R.HowardM. F.AnteV. M.BinaJ. E. (2016). Vibrio cholerae LeuO links the ToxR regulon to expression of lipid A remodeling genes.Infect. Immun.843161–3171. 10.1128/IAI.00445-16

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  BinaX. R.TaylorD. L.VikramA.AnteV. M.BinaJ. E. (2013). Vibrio cholerae ToxR downregulates virulence factor production in response to cyclo(Phe-Pro).mBio4:e00366-13. 10.1128/mBio.00366-13

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  BlokeschM. (2012). Chitin colonization, chitin degradation and chitin- induced natural competence of Vibrio cholerae are subject to catabolite repression.Environ. Microbiol.141898–1912. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02689.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  BlokeschM.SchoolnikG. K. (2008). The extracellular nuclease Dns and its role in natural transformation of Vibrio cholerae.J. Bacteriol.1907232–7240. 10.1128/JB.00959-08

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22

  BongrandC.SansonettiP. J.ParsotC. (2012). Characterization of the promoter, MxiE box and 5’ UTR of genes controlled by the activity of the type III secretion apparatus in Shigella flexneri.PLoS One7:e32862. 10.1371/journal.pone.0032862

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  BradleyE. S.BodiK.IsmailA. M.CamilliA. (2011). A genome-wide approach to discovery of small RNAs involved in regulation of virulence in Vibrio cholerae.PLoS Pathog.7:e1000212610.1371/journal.ppat.1002126

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  BrownR. C.TaylorR. K. (1995). Organization of tcp, acf, and toxT genes within a ToxT-dependent operon.Mol. Microbiol.16425–439. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02408.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  BuchrieserC.GlaserP.RusniokC.NedjariH.D’HautevilleH.KunstF.et al (2000). The virulence plasmid pWR100 and the repertoire of proteins secreted by the type III secretion apparatus of Shigella flexneri.Mol. Microbiol.38760–771. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02179.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  CaiyiC. L.MerrellD. S.CamilliA.KaperJ. B. (2002). ToxR interferes with CRP-dependent transcriptional activation of ompT in Vibrio cholerae.Mol. Microbiol.431577–1589. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02845.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  CarrollP. A.TashimaK. T.RogersM. B.DiRitaV. J.CalderwoodS. B. (1997). Phase variation in tcpH modulates expression of the ToxR regulon in Vibrio cholerae.Mol. Microbiol.251099–1111. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.5371901.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  CastellanosM. I.HarrisonD. J.SmithJ. M.LabahnS. K.LevyK. M.WingH. J. (2009). VirB alleviates H-NS repression of the icsP promoter in Shigella flexneri from sites more than one kilobase upstream of the transcription start site.J. Bacteriol.1914047–4050. 10.1128/JB.00313-09

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  CerdanR.BlochV.YangY.BertinP.DumasC.RimskyS.et al (2003). Crystal structure of the N-terminal dimerisation domain of VicH, the H-NS-like protein of Vibrio cholerae.J. Mol. Biol.334179–185. 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.09.051

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  ChakrabortyS.WinardhiR. S.MorganL. K.YanJ.KenneyL. J. (2017). Non-canonical activation of OmpR drives acid and osmotic stress responses in single bacterial cells.Nat. Commun.8:1587. 10.1038/s41467-017-02030-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  ChampionG. A.NeelyM. N.BrennanM. A.DiRitaV. J. (1997). A branch in the ToxR regulatory cascade of Vibrio cholerae revealed by characterization of toxT mutant strains.Mol. Microbiol.23323–331. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.2191585.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  ChapmanC.HenryM.Bishop-LillyK. A.AwosikaJ.BriskaA.PtashkinR. N.et al (2015). Scanning the landscape of genome architecture of non-O1 and non-O139 Vibrio cholerae by whole genome mapping reveals extensive population genetic diversity.PLoS One10:e0120311. 10.1371/journal.pone.0120311

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  ChatterjeeA.DuttaP. K.ChowdhuryR. (2007). Effect of fatty acids and cholesterol present in bile on expression of virulence factors and motility of Vibrio cholerae.Infect. Immun.751946–1953. 10.1128/IAI.01435-06

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  ChenL. C.RohdeJ. E.SharpG. W. (1971). Intestinal adenyl-cyclase activity in human cholera.Lancet 1939–941. 10.1016/S0140-6736(71)91443-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  CohenM. S.ChangP. (2018). Insights into the biogenesis, function, and regulation of ADP-ribosylation.Nat. Chem. Biol.14236–24310.1038/nchembio.2568

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  ColonnaB.CasalinoM.FradianiP. A.ZagagliaC.NaitzaS.LeoniL.et al (1995). H-NS regulation of virulence gene expression in enteroinvasive Escherichia coli harboring the virulence plasmid integrated into the host chromosome.J. Bacteriol.1774703–4712. 10.1128/jb.177.16.4703-4712.1995

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  DalebrouxZ. D.SvenssonS. L.GaynorE. C.SwansonM. S. (2010). ppGpp conjures bacterial virulence.Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.74171–199. 10.1128/MMBR.00046-09

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  DalebrouxZ. D.SwansonM. S. (2012). ppGpp: magic beyond RNA polymerase.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.10203–212. 10.1038/nrmicro2720

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  DaliaA. B. (2016). RpoS is required for natural transformation of Vibrio cholerae through regulation of chitinases.Environ. Microbiol.183758–3767. 10.1111/1462-2920.13302

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  DaliaA. B.LazinskiD. W.CamilliA. (2014). Identification of a membrane-bound transcriptional regulator that links chitin and natural competence in Vibrio cholerae.mBio5:e01028-13. 10.1128/mBio.01028-13

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  DameR. T.NoomM. C.WuiteG. J. (2006). Bacterial chromatin organization by H-NS protein unravelled using dual DNA manipulation.Nature444387–390. 10.1038/nature05283

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  DasB.MartínezE.MidonetC.BarreF. X. (2013). Integrative mobile elements exploiting Xer recombination.Trends Microbiol.2123–30. 10.1016/j.tim.2012.10.003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  DasB.PalR. R.BagS.BhadraR. K. (2009). Stringent response in Vibrio cholerae: genetic analysis of spoT gene function and identification of a novel (p)ppGpp synthetase gene.Mol. Microbiol.72380–398. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06653.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  DaviesB. W.BogardR. W.YoungT. S.MekalanosJ. J. (2012). Coordinated regulation of accessory genetic elements produces cyclic di-nucleotides for V.cholerae virulence. Cell149358–370. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.053

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  DayW. A.Jr.MaurelliA. T. (2001). Shigella flexneri LuxS quorum-sensing system modulates virB expression but is not essential for virulence.Infect. Immun.6915–23. 10.1128/IAI.69.1.15-23.2001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  De HaanL.HirstT. R. (2004). Cholera toxin: a paradigm for multi-functional engagement of cellular mechanisms.Mol. Membr. Biol.2177–92. 10.1080/09687680410001663267

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  De SilvaR. S.KovacikovaG.LinW.TaylorR. K.SkorupskiK. (2005). Crystal structure of the virulence gene activator AphA from Vibrio cholerae reveals it is a novel member of the winged helix transcription factor superfamily.J. Bio. Chem.28013779–13783. 10.1074/jbc.M413781200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  DewachterL.VerstraetenN.FauvartM.MichielsJ. (2016). The bacterial cell cycle checkpoint protein Obg and its role in programmed cell death.Microb. Cell.3255-256. 10.15698/mic2016.06.507

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  d’HautevilleH.Dufourc QlagelouseR.NatoF.SansonettiP. J. (1996). Lack of cleavage of IcsA in Shigella flexneri causes aberrant movement and allows demonstration of a cross-reactive eukaryotic protein.Infect. Immun.64511–517.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  Di MartinoM. L.FalconiM.MicheliG.ColonnaB.ProssedaG. (2016a). The multifaceted activity of the VirF regulatory protein in the Shigella lifestyle.Front. Mol. Biosci.3:61. 10.3389/fmolb.2016.00061

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  Di MartinoM. L.RomillyC.WagnerE. G.ColonnaB.ProssedaG. (2016b). One gene and two proteins: a leaderless mRNA supports the translation of a shorter form of the Shigella VirF regulator.mBio 7e01860-16. 10.1128/mBio.01860-16.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  DillonS. C.DormanC. J. (2010). Bacterial nucleoid-associated proteins, nucleoid structure and gene expression.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.8949–959. 10.1038/nrmicro2261

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  DillonS. C.EspinosaE.HokampK.UsseryD. W.CasadesúsJ.DormanC. J. (2012). LeuO is a global regulator of gene expression in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium.Mol. Microbiol.851072–1089. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08162.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  DiRitaV. J.MekalanosJ. J. (1991). Periplasmic interaction between two membrane regulatory proteins, ToxR and ToxS, results in signal transduction and transcriptional activation.Cell6429–37. 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90206-E

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  DiRitaV. J.ParsotC.JanderG.MekalanosJ. J. (1991). Regulatory cascade controls virulence in Vibrio cholerae.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.885403–5407. 10.1073/pnas.88.12.5403

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  DommanD.ChowdhuryF.KhanA. I.DormanM. J.MutrejaA.UddinM. I.et al (2018). Defining endemic cholera at three levels of spatiotemporal resolution within Bangladesh.Nat. Genet.50951–955. 10.1038/s41588-018-0150-8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  DommanD.QuiliciM. L.DormanM. J.NjamkepoE.MutrejaA.MatherA. E.et al (2017). Integrated view of Vibrio cholerae in the Americas.Science358789–793. 10.1126/science.aao2136

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  DormanC. J. (1992). The VirF protein from Shigella flexneri is a member of the AraC transcription factor superfamily and is highly homologous to Rns, a positive regulator of virulence genes in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.Mol. Microbiol.6:1575. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb00879.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  DormanC. J. (1995). DNA topology and the global control of bacterial gene expression: implications for the regulation of virulence gene expression.Microbiology1411271–1280. 10.1099/13500872-141-6-1271

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  DormanC. J. (2007). H-NS, the genome sentinel.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.5157–161. 10.1038/nrmicro1598

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  DormanC. J. (2009). The virulence plasmids of Shigella flexneri, in Microbial Megaplasmids, ed. E.Schwartz (Heidelberg: Springer151–170.

  • Google Scholar

• 62

  DormanC. J. (2015). Integrating small molecule signalling and H-NS antagonism in Vibrio cholerae, a bacterium with two chromosomes.Mol. Microbiol.97612–615. 10.1111/mmi.13063

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63

  DormanC. J.ColganA. M.DormanM. J. (2016). Bacterial pathogen gene regulation: a DNA-structure-centred view of a protein-dominated domain.Clin. Sci.1301165–1177. 10.1042/CS20160024

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 64

  DormanC. J.DormanM. J. (2017). Control of virulence gene transcription by indirect readout in Vibrio cholerae and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium.Environ. Microbiol.193834–3845. 10.1111/1462-2920

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65

  DormanC. J.KaneK. A. (2009). DNA bridging and antibridging: a role for bacterial nucleoid-associated proteins in regulating the expression of laterally acquired genes.FEMS Microbiol. Rev.33587–592. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00155.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66

  DormanC. J.Ni BhriainN.HigginsC. F. (1990). DNA supercoiling and environmental regulation of virulence gene expression in Shigella flexneri.Nature344789–792. 10.1078/1438-4221-00105

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 67

  DormanC.J.McKennaS.BeloinC. (2001). Regulation of virulence gene expression in Shigella flexneri, a facultative intracellular pathogen.Int. J. Med. Microbiol.29189–96. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03314.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68

  DurandJ. M.BjörkG. R. (2003). Putrescine or a combination of methionine and arginine restores virulence gene expression in a tRNA modification-deficient mutant of Shigella flexneri: a possible role in adaptation of virulence.Mol. Microbiol.47519–527. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01767.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 69

  DurandJ. M.DagbergB.UhlinB. E.BjörkG. R. (2000). Transfer RNA modification, temperature and DNA superhelicity have a common target in the regulatory network of the virulence of Shigella flexneri: the expression of the virF gene.Mol. Microbiol.35924–935. 10.1128/JB.184.20.5529-5532.2002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 70

  EganS. M. (2002). Growing repertoire of AraC/XylS activators.J. Bacteriol.1845529–5532. 10.1128/IAI.71.6.2993-2999.2003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 71

  FaruqueS. M.ZhuJ.AsadulghaniKamruzzamanM.MekalanosJ. J. (2003). Examination of diverse toxin-coregulated pilus-positive Vibrio cholerae strains fails to demonstrate evidence for Vibrio pathogenicity island phage.Infect. Immun.712993–2999. 10.1371/journal.pone.0047756

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 72

  FenglerV. H.BoritschE. C.TutzS.SeperA.EbnerH.RoierS.et al (2012). Disulfide bond formation and ToxR activity in Vibrio cholerae.PLoS One7:e47756. 10.1371/journal.pone.0047756.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 73

  FuY.HoB. T.MekalanosJ. J. (2018). Tracking Vibrio cholerae cell-cell interactions during infection reveals bacterial population dynamics within intestinal microenvironments.Cell Host Microbe23274–281. 10.1016/j.chom.2017.12.006

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 74

  FukudaI.SuzukiT.MunakataH.HayashiN.KatayamaE.YoshikawaM.et al (1995). Cleavage of Shigella surface protein VirG occurs at a specific site, but the secretion is not essential for intracellular spreading.J. Bacteriol.1771719–1726. 10.1016/j.chom.2012.03.001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 75

  FukumatsuM.OgawaM.ArakawaS.SuzukiM.NakayamaK.ShimizuS.et al (2012). Shigella targets epithelial tricellular junctions and uses a noncanonical clathrin-dependent endocytic pathway to spread between cells.Cell Host Microbe11325–336. 10.1128/IAI.74.5.3060-3064.2006

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 76

  GhoshA.PaulK.ChowdhuryR. (2006). Role of the histone-like nucleoid structuring protein in colonization, motility, and bile-dependent repression of virulence gene expression in Vibrio cholerae.Infect. Immun.743060–3064. 10.1074/jbc.M116.761809

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 77

  GkekasS.SinghR. K.ShkumatovA. V.MessensJ.FauvartM.VerstraetenN.et al (2017). Structural and biochemical analysis of Escherichia coli ObgE, a central regulator of bacterial persistence.J. Biol. Chem.2925871–5883. 10.1074/jbc.M116.761809

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 78

  GoreA. L.PayneS. M. (2010). CsrA and Cra influence Shigella flexneri pathogenesis.Infect. Immun.784674–4682. 10.1128/IAI.00566-10

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 79

  GossT. J.SeabornC. P.GrayM. D.KrukonisE. S. (2010). Identification of the TcpP-binding site in the toxT promoter of Vibrio cholerae and the role of ToxR in TcpP-mediated activation.Infect. Immun.784122–4133. 10.1128/IAI.00566-10

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 80

  GuadarramaC.Medrano-LópezA.OropezaR.Hernández-LucasI.CalvaE. (2014). The Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi LeuO global regulator forms tetramers: residues involved in oligomerization, DNA binding, and transcriptional regulation.J. Bacteriol.1962143–2154. 10.1128/JB.01484-14

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 81

  HaasB. L.MatsonJ. S.DiRitaV. J.BiteenJ. S. (2015). Single-molecule tracking in live Vibrio cholerae reveals that ToxR recruits the membrane-bound virulence regulator TcpP to the toxT promoter.Mol. Microbiol.964–13. 10.1111/mmi.12834

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 82

  HäseC. C.MekalanosJ. J. (1998). TcpP protein is a positive regulator of virulence gene expression in Vibrio cholerae.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.95730–734. 10.1073/pnas.95.2.730

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 83

  HeH.CooperJ. N.MishraA.RaskinD. M. (2012). Stringent response regulation of biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae.J. Bacteriol.1942962–2972. 10.1128/JB.00014-12

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 84

  HigginsD. E.DiRitaV. J. (1996). Genetic analysis of the interaction between Vibrio cholerae transcription activator ToxR and toxT promoter DNA.J. Bacteriol.1781080–1087. 10.1128/jb.178.4.1080-1087.1996

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 85

  HigginsD. E.NazarenoE.DiRitaV. J. (1992). The virulence gene activator ToxT from Vibrio cholerae is a member of the AraC family of transcriptional activators.J. Bacteriol.1746974–6980. 10.1128/jb.174.21.6974-6980.1992

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 86

  HighN.MounierJ.PreìvostM. C.SansonettiP. J. (1992). IpaB of Shigella flexneri causes entry into epithelial cells and escape from the phagocytic vacuole.EMBO J.111991–1999. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05253.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 87

  HryckowianA. J.BattestiA.LemkeJ. J.MeyerZ. C.WelchR. A. (2014). IraL is an RssB anti-adaptor that stabilizes RpoS during logarithmic phase growth in Escherichia coli and Shigella.mBio.5:e01043-14. 10.1128/mBio.01043-14

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 88

  HuberK. E.WaldorM. K. (2002). Filamentous phage integration requires the host recombinases XerC and XerD.Nature417656–659. 10.1038/nature00782

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 89

  HungD. T.MekalanosJ. J. (2005). Bile acids induce cholera toxin expression in Vibrio cholerae in a ToxT-independent manner.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1023028–3033. 10.1073/pnas.0409559102

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 90

  IwanagaM.YamamotoK. (1985). New medium for the production of cholera toxin by Vibrio cholerae O1 biotype El Tor.J. Clin. Microbiol.22405–408.

  • Google Scholar

• 91

  IwanagaM.YamamotoK.HigaN.IchinoseY.NakasoneN.TanabeM. (1986). Culture conditions for stimulating cholera toxin production by Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor.Microbiol. Immunol.301075–1083. 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1986.tb03037.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 92

  JangJ.JungK. -T.ParkJ.YooC. -K.RhieG. -E. (2011). The Vibrio cholerae VarS/VarA two-component system controls the expression of virulence proteins through ToxT regulation.Microbiology1571466–1473. 10.1099/mic.0.043737-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 93

  JoelssonA.KanB.ZhuJ. (2007). Quorum sensing enhances the stress response in Vibrio cholerae.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.733742–3746. 10.1128/AEM.02804-06

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 94

  KaneC. D.SchuchR.DayW.A.Jr.MaurelliA. T. (2002). MxiE regulates intracellular expression of factors secreted by the Shigella flexneri 2a type III secretion system.J. Bacteriol.1844409–4419. 10.1128/JB.184.16.4409-4419.2002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 95

  KaneK. A.DormanC. J. (2011). Rational design of an artificial genetic switch: Co-option of the H-NS-repressed proU operon by the VirB virulence master regulator.J. Bacteriol.1935950-5960. 10.1128/JB.05557-11

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 96

  KaneK. A.DormanC. J. (2012). VirB-mediated positive feedback control of the virulence gene regulatory cascade of Shigella flexneri.J. Bacteriol.1945264–5273. 10.1128/JB.00800-12

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 97

  KaraolisD. K.JohnsonJ. A.BaileyC. C.BoedekerE. C.KaperJ. B.ReevesP. R. (1998). A Vibrio cholerae pathogenicity island associated with epidemic and pandemic strains.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.953134–3139. 10.1073/pnas.95.6.3134

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 98

  KaraolisD. K.SomaraS.ManevalD. R.Jr.JohnsonJ. A.KaperJ. B. (1999). A bacteriophage encoding a pathogenicity island, a type-IV pilus and a phage receptor in cholera bacteria.Nature399375–379. 10.1038/20715

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 99

  KaziM. I.ConradoA. R.MeyA. R.PayneS. M.DaviesB. W. (2016). ToxR antagonizes H-NS regulation of horizontally acquired genes to drive host colonization.PLoS Pathog.12:e1005570. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005570

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 100

  KingC. A.van HeyningenW. E. (1973). Deactivation of cholera toxin by a sialidase monosialosylganglioside.J. Infect. Dis.127639–647. 10.1093/infdis/127.6.639

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 101

  KlancherC. A.HayesC. A.DaliaA. B. (2017). The nucleoid occlusion protein SlmA is a direct transcriptional activator of chitobiose utilization in Vibrio cholerae.PLoS Genet.13:e1006877. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006877

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 102

  KlauckE.TypasA.HenggeR. (2007). The sigmaS subunit of RNA polymerase as a signal integrator and master regulator in the general stress response in Escherichia coli.Sci. Prog.90103–127.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 103

  KovacikovaG.LinW.SkorupskiK. (2003). The virulence activator AphA links quorum sensing to pathogenesis and physiology in Vibrio cholerae by repressing the expression of a penicillin amidase gene on the small chromosome.J. Bacteriol.1854825-4836. 10.1128/JB.16.4825-4836.2003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 104

  KovacikovaG.LinW.SkorupskiK. (2004). Vibrio cholerae AphA uses a novel mechanism for virulence gene activation that involves interaction with the LysR-type regulator AphB at the tcpPH promoter.Mol. Microbiol.53129–142. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04121.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 105

  KovacikovaG.LinW.SkorupskiK. (2005). Dual regulation of genes involved in acetoin biosynthesis and motility/biofilm formation by the virulence activator AphA and the acetate-responsive LysR-type regulator AlsR in Vibrio cholerae.Mol. Microbiol.57420–433. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04700.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 106

  KovacikovaG.LinW.SkorupskiK. (2010). The LysR-type virulence activator AphB regulates the expression of genes in Vibrio cholerae in response to low pH and anaerobiosis.J. Bacteriol.1924181–4191. 10.1128/JB.00193-10

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 107

  KovacikovaG.SkorupskiK. (2001). Overlapping binding sites for the virulence gene regulators AphA, AphB and cAMP-CRP at the Vibrio cholerae tcpPH promoter.Mol. Microbiol.41393–407. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02518.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 108

  KovacikovaG.SkorupskiK. (2002). Regulation of virulence gene expression in Vibrio cholerae by quorum sensing: HapR functions at the aphA promoter.Mol. Microbiol.461135–1147. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03229.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 109

  KrinE.CambrayG.MazelD. (2014). The superintegron integrase and the cassette promoters are co-regulated in Vibrio cholerae.PLoS One9:e91194. 10.1371/journal.pone.0091194

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 110

  KrukonisE. S.DiRitaV. J. (2003). DNA binding and ToxR responsiveness by the wing domain of TcpP, an activator of virulence gene expression in Vibrio cholerae.Mol. Cell12157–165. 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00222-3

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 111

  KrukonisE. S.YuR. R.DiRitaV. J. (2000). The Vibrio cholerae ToxR/TcpP/ToxT virulence cascade: distinct roles for two membrane-localized transcriptional activators on a single promoter.Mol. Microbiol.3867–84. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02111.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 112

  LanR.LumbB.RyanD.ReevesP. R. (2001). Molecular evolution of large virulence plasmid in Shigella clones and enteroinvasive Escherichia coli.Infect. Immun.696303–6309. 10.1128/IAI.69.10.6303-6309.2001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 113

  Le RouxF.BlokeschM. (2018). Eco-evolutionary dynamics linked to horizontal gene transfer in vibrios.Annu. Rev. Microbiol.7289–110. 10.1146/annurev-micro-090817-062148

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 114

  LeeK.-M.ParkY.BariW.YoonM. Y.GoJ.KimS. C.et al (2012). Activation of Cholera toxin production by anaerobic respiration of trimethylamine N-oxide in Vibrio cholerae.J. Biol. Chem.28739742–39752. 10.1074/jbc.M112.394932

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 115

  LenzD.H.BasslerB.L. (2007) The small nucleoid protein Fis is involved in Vibrio cholerae quorum sensing.Mol. Microbiol.63859–876. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05545.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 116

  LenzD.H.MillerM.B.ZhuJ.KulkarniR.V.BasslerB.L. (2005). CsrA and three redundant small RNAs regulate quorum sensing in Vibrio cholerae.Mol. Microbiol.581186–1202. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04902.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 117

  LiJ.WehmeyerG.LovellS.BattaileK. P.EganS. M. (2016). 1.65 Å resolution structure of the AraC-family transcriptional activator ToxT from Vibrio cholerae.Acta. Crystallogr. F. Struct. Biol. Commun.72726–731. 10.1107/S2053230X1601298X

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 118

  LiX.RosemanS. (2004). The chitinolytic cascade in vibrios is regulated by chitin oligosaccharides and a two-component chitin catabolic sensor/kinase.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.101627–631. 10.1073/pnas.0307645100

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 119

  LimM. S.NgD.ZongZ.ArvaiA. S.TaylorR. K.TainerJ. A.et al (2010). Vibrio cholerae El Tor TcpA crystal structure and mechanism for pilus-mediated microcolony formation.Mol. Microbiol.77755–770. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07244.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 120

  LinW.KovacikovaG.SkorupskiK. (2007). The quorum sensing regulator HapR downregulates the expression of the virulence gene transcription factor AphA in Vibrio cholerae by antagonising Lrp- and VpsR-mediated activation.Mol. Microbiol.64953–96710.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05693.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 121

  LiuZ.YangM.PeterfreundG. L.TsouA. M.SelamogluN.DaldalF.et al (2011). Vibrio cholerae anaerobic induction of virulence gene expression is controlled by thiol-based switches of virulence regulator AphB.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.108810–815. 10.1073/pnas.1014640108

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 122

  LowdenM. J.SkorupskiK.PellegriniM.ChiorazzoM. G.TaylorR. K.KullF. J. (2010). Structure of Vibrio cholerae ToxT reveals a mechanism for fatty acid regulation of virulence genes.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1072860–2865. 10.1073/pnas.0915021107

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 123

  LucchiniS.RowleyG.GoldbergM. D.HurdD.HarrisonM.HintonJ. C. (2006). H-NS mediates the silencing of laterally acquired genes in bacteria.PLoS Pathog.2:e81. 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020081

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 124

  LundP.TramontiA.De BiaseD. (2014). Coping with low pH: molecular strategies in neutralophilic bacteria.FEMS Microbiol. Rev.38: 1091–1125. 10.1111/1574-6976.12076

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 125

  MarmanH. E.MeyA. R.PayneS. M. (2014). Elongation factor P and modifying enzyme PoxA are necessary for virulence of Shigella flexneri.Infect. Immun.823612–3621. 10.1128/IAI.01532-13

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 126

  MarteynB.WestN. P.BrowningD. F.ColeJ. A.ShawJ. G.PalmF.et al (2010). Modulation of Shigella virulence in response to available oxygen in vivo.Nature465355–358. 10.1038/nature08970

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 127

  MaurelliA. T.FernandezR. E.BlochC. A.RodeC. K.FasanoA. (1998). “Black holes” and bacterial pathogenicity: a large genomic deletion that enhances the virulence of Shigella spp.and enteroinvasive Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.953943–3948. 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3943

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 128

  MauricioR. P.JeffriesC. M.SvergunD. I.DeaneJ. E. (2016). The Shigella virulence factor IcsA relieves N-WASP autoinhibition by displacing the verprolin homology/cofilin/acidic (VCA) domain.J. Biol. Chem.292134–145. 10.1074/jbc.M116.758003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 129

  MavrisM.SansonettiP. J.ParsotC. (2002). Identification of the cis-acting site involved in activation of promoters regulated by activity of the type III secretion apparatus in Shigella flexneri.J. Bacteriol.1846751–6759. 10.1128/JB.184.24.6751-6759.2002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 130

  McKennaS.BeloinC.DormanC.J. (2003). In vitro DNA-binding properties of VirB, the Shigella flexneri virulence regulatory protein.FEBS Lett.545183–187. 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)00524-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 131

  McLeodS. M.WaldorM. K. (2004). Characterization of XerC- and XerD-dependent CTX phage integration in Vibrio cholerae.Mol. Microbiol.54935–947. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04309.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 132

  McNairnE.Ni BhriainN.DormanC. J. (1995). Overexpression of the Shigella flexneri genes coding for DNA topoisomerase IV compensates for loss of DNA topoisomerase I: effect on virulence gene expression.Mol. Microbiol.15507–517. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02264.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 133

  MeibomK. L.BlokeschM.DolganovN. A.WuC.SchoolnikG. K. (2005). Chitin induces natural competence in Vibrio cholerae.Science3101824–1827. 10.1126/science.1120096

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 134

  MerrellD. S.CamilliA. (1999). The cadA gene of Vibrio cholerae is induced during infection and plays a role in acid tolerance.Mol. Microbiol.34836–849. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01650.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 135

  MerrellD. S.CamilliA. (2000). Regulation of Vibrio cholerae genes required for acid tolerance by a member of the “ToxR-like” family of transcription regulators.J. Bacteriol.1825342–5350. 10.1128/JB.182.19.5342-5350.2000

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 136

  MerrellD. S.TischlerA. D.LeeS. H.CamilliA. (2000). Vibrio cholerae requires rpoS for efficient intestinal colonization.Infect. Immun.686691–6696. 10.1128/IAI.68.12.6691-6696.2000

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 137

  MeyA. R.ButzH. A.PayneS. M. (2015). Vibrio cholerae CsrA regulates ToxR levels in response to amino acids and is essential for virulence.mBio6:e01064. 10.1128/mBio.01064-15

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 138

  MidgettC. R.Almagro-MorenoS.PellegriniM.TaylorR. K.SkorupskiK.KullF. J. (2017). Bile salts and alkaline pH reciprocally modulate the interaction between the periplasmic domains of Vibrio cholerae ToxR and ToxS.Mol. Microbiol.105258–27210.1111/mmi.13699

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 139

  MillerV. L.DiRitaV. J.MekalanosJ. J. (1989). Identification of toxS, a regulatory gene whose product enhances toxR-mediated activation of the cholera toxin promoter.J. Bacteriol.1711288–1293. 10.1128/jb.171.3.1288-1293.1989

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 140

  MillerV. L.MekalanosJ. J. (1988). A novel suicide vector and its use in construction of insertion mutations: osmoregulation of outer membrane proteins and virulence determinants in Vibrio cholerae requires ToxR.J. Bacteriol.1702575–2583. 10.1128/jb.170.6.2575-2583.1988

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 141

  MillerV. L.TaylorR. K.MekalanosJ. J. (1987). Cholera toxin transcriptional activator toxR is a transmembrane DNA binding protein.Cell48271–279. 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90430-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 142

  MitobeJ.ArakawaE.WatanabeH. (2005). A sensor of the two-component system CpxA affects expression of the type III secretion system through posttranscriptional processing of InvE.J. Bacteriol.187107–113. 10.1128/JB.187.1.107-113.2005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 143

  MitobeJ.Morita-IshiharaT.IshihamaA.WatanabeH. (2008). Involvement of RNA-binding protein Hfq in the post-transcriptional regulation of invE gene expression in Shigella sonnei.J. Biol. Chem.2835738–5747. 10.1074/jbc.M710108200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 144

  MitobeJ.Morita-IshiharaT.IshihamaA.WatanabeH. (2009). Involvement of RNA-binding protein Hfq in the osmotic-response regulation of invE gene expression in Shigella sonnei.BMC Microbiol.9:110. 10.1186/1471-2180-9-110

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 145

  MitobeJ.YanagiharaI.OhnishiK.YamamotoS.OhnishiM.IshihamaA.et al (2011). RodZ regulates the post-transcriptional processing of the Shigella sonnei type III secretion system.EMBO Rep.12911–916. 10.1038/embor.2011.132

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 146

  MogullS. A.Runyen-JaneckyL. J.HongM.PayneS. M. (2001). dksA is required for intercellular spread of Shigella flexneri via an RpoS-independent mechanism.Infect. Immun.695742–5751. 10.1128/IAI.69.9.5742-5751.2001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 147

  MoorthyS.WatnickP. I. (2005). Identification of novel stage-specific genetic requirements through whole genome transcription profiling of Vibrio cholerae biofilm development.Mol. Microbiol.571623–1635. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04797.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 148

  MorganS. J.FelekS.GadwalS.KoropatkinN. M.PerryJ. W.BrysonA. B.et al (2011). The two faces of ToxR: activator of ompU, co-regulator of toxT in Vibrio cholerae.Mol. Microbiol.81113–128. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07681

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 149

  MorganS. J.FrenchE. L.ThomsonJ. J.SeabornC. P.ShivelyC. A.KrukonisE. S. (2015). Formation of an intramolecular periplasmic disulfide bond in TcpP protects TcpP and TcpH from degradation in Vibrio cholerae.J. Bacteriol.198498–509. 10.1128/JB.00338-15

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 150

  NakayamaS.WatanabeH. (1995). Involvement of cpxA, a sensor of a two-component regulatory system, in the pH-dependent regulation of expression of Shigella sonnei virF gene.J. Bacteriol.1775062–5069. 10.1128/jb.177.17.5062-5069.1995

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 151

  NakayamaS. I.WatanabeH. (1998). Identification of cpxR as a positive regulator essential for expression of the Shigella sonnei virF gene.J. Bacteriol.1803522–3528.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 152

  NavarreW. W.PorwollikS.WangY.McClellandM.RosenH.LibbyS. J.et al (2006). Selective silencing of foreign DNA with low GC content by the H-NS protein in Salmonella.Science313236–23810.1126/science.1128794

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 153

  Ni BhriainN.DormanC. J. (1993). Isolation and characterization of a topA mutant of Shigella flexneri.Mol. Microbiol.7351–358. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01127.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 154

  NielsenA. T.DolganovN. A.OttoG.MillerM. C.WuC. Y.SchoolnikG. K. (2006). RpoS controls the Vibrio cholerae mucosal escape response.PLoS Pathog.2:e109. 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020109

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 155

  NyeM. B.PfauJ. D.SkorupskiK.TaylorR. K. (2000). Vibrio cholerae H-NS silences virulence gene expression at multiple steps in the ToxR regulatory cascade.J. Bacteriol.1824295–4303. 10.1128/JB.182.15.4295-4303.2000

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 156

  NyeM. B.TaylorR. K. (2003). Vibrio cholerae H-NS domain structure and function with respect to transcriptional repression of ToxR regulon genes reveals differences among H-NS family members.Mol. Microbiol.50427–444. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03701.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 157

  OhY. T.ParkY.YoonM. Y.BariW.GoJ.MinK. B.et al (2014). Cholera toxin production during anaerobic trimethylamine N-oxide respiration is mediated by stringent response in Vibrio cholerae.J. Biol. Chem.28913232–13242. 10.1074/jbc.M113.540088

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 158

  OttemannK. M.MekalanosJ. J. (1996). The ToxR protein of Vibrio cholerae forms homodimers and heterodimers.J. Bacteriol.178156–162. 10.1128/jb.178.1.156-162.1996

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 159

  ParsotC.AgeronE.PennoC.MavrisM.JamoussiK.d’HautevilleH.et al (2005). A secreted anti-activator, OspD1, and its chaperone, Spa15, are involved in the control of transcription by the type III secretion apparatus activity in Shigella flexneri.Mol. Microbiol.561627–1635. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04645.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 160

  PennoC.ParsotC. (2006). Transcriptional slippage in mxiE controls transcription and translation of the downstream mxiD gene, which encodes a component of the Shigella flexneri type III secretion apparatus.J. Bacteriol.1881196–1198. 10.1128/JB.188.3.1196-1198.2006

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 161

  PennoC.SansonettiP.ParsotC. (2005). Frameshifting by transcriptional slippage is involved in production of MxiE, the transcription activator regulated by the activity of the type III secretion apparatus in Shigella flexneri.Mol. Microbiol.56204–214. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04530.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 162

  PerdomoO. J.CavaillonJ.M.HuerreM.OhayonH.GounonP.SansonettiP.J. (1994). Acute inflammation causes epithelial invasion and mucosal destruction in experimental shigellosis.J. Exp. Med.1801307–1319. 10.1084/jem.180.4.1307

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 163

  PetersonK. M.MekalanosJ. J. (1988). Characterisation of the Vibrio cholerae ToxR regulon: identification of novel genes involved in intestinal colonization.Infect. Immun.562822–2829.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 164

  PillaG.McVickerG.TangC. M. (2017). Genetic plasticity of the Shigella virulence plasmid is mediated by the intra- and inter-molecular events between insertion sequences.PLoS Genet.13:e1007014. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007014

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 165

  PillaG.TangC. M. (2018). Going around in circles: virulence plasmids in enteric pathogens.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.16484–495. 10.1038/s41579-018-0031-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 166

  PilonietaM. C.MunsonG. P. (2008). The chaperone IpgC copurifies with the virulence regulator MxiE.J. Bacteriol.1902249–2251. 10.1128/JB.01824-07

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 167

  PorterM. E.DormanC. J. (1994). A role for H-NS in the thermo-osmotic regulation of virulence gene expression in Shigella flexneri.J. Bacteriol.1764187–4191. 10.1128/jb.176.13.4187-4191.1994

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 168

  PorterM. E.DormanC. J. (1997a). Differential regulation of the plasmid-encoded genes in the Shigella flexneri virulence regulon.Molec. Gen. Genet.25693–103. 10.1007/s004380050550

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 169

  PorterM. E.DormanC. J. (1997b). Positive regulation of Shigella flexneri virulence genes by integration host factor.J. Bacteriol.1796537–6550. 10.1128/jb.179.21.6537-6550.1997

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 170

  PorterM. E.SmithS. G.DormanC. J. (1998). Two highly related regulatory proteins, Shigella flexneri VirF and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Rns, have common and distinct regulatory properties.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.162303–309. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb13013.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 171

  PorterM. E.DormanC. J. (2002). In vivo DNA-binding and oligomerization properties of the Shigella flexneri AraC-like transcriptional regulator VirF as identified by random and site-specific mutagenesis.J. Bacteriol.184531–539. 10.1128/JB.184.2.531-539.2002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 172

  ProssedaG.FalconiM.GiangrossiM.GualerziC. O.MicheliG.ColonnaB. (2004). The virF promoter in Shigella: more than just a curved DNA stretch.Mol. Microbiol.51523–537. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03848.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 173

  QuinnH. J.CameronA. D.DormanC. J. (2014). Bacterial regulon evolution: distinct responses and roles for the identical OmpR proteins of Salmonella Typhimurium and Escherichia coli in the acid stress response.PLoS Genet.10:e1004215. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004215

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 174

  RaskinD. M.JudsonN.MekalanosJ. J. (2007). Regulation of the stringent response is the essential function of the conserved bacterial G protein CgtA in Vibrio cholerae.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1044636–4641. 10.1073/pnas.0611650104

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 175

  RinggaardS.HubbardT.MandlikA.DavisB. M.WaldorM. K. (2015). RpoS and quorum sensing control expression and polar localization of Vibrio cholerae chemotaxis cluster III proteins in vitro and in vivo.Mol. Microbiol.97660-675. 10.1111/mmi.13053

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 176

  RossiterA. E.GodfreyR. E.ConnollyJ. A.BusbyS. J.HendersonI. R.BrowningD. F. (2015). Expression of different bacterial cytotoxins is controlled by two global transcription factors, Crp and Fis, that co-operate in a shared-recruitment mechanism.Biochem. J.466323–335. 10.1042/BJ20141315

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 177

  RutherfordS. T.van KesselJ. C.ShaoY.BasslerB. L. (2011). AphA and LuxR/HapR reciprocally control quorum sensing in vibrios.Genes Dev.25397–408. 10.1101/gad.2015011

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 178

  SansonettiP. J.KopeckoD. J.FormalS. B. (1982). Involvement of a plasmid in the invasive ability of Shigella flexneri.Infect. Immun.35850–860.

  • Google Scholar

• 179

  SchellhornH. E. (2014). Elucidating the function of the RpoS regulon.Future Microbiol.9497–507. 10.2217/fmb.14.9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 180

  Schmid-HempelP.FrankS. A. (2007). Pathogenesis, virulence and infective dose.PLoS Pathog.3:e147. 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030147

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 181

  SchuchR.MaurelliA. T. (1997). Virulence plasmid instability in Shigella flexneri 2a is induced by virulence gene expression.Infect. Immun.653686–3692.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 182

  SchuhmacherD. A.KloseK. E. (1999). Environmental signals modulate ToxT-dependent virulence factor expression in Vibrio cholerae.J. Bacteriol.1811508–1514.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 183

  SeitzP.BlokeschM. (2013). DNA-uptake machinery of naturally competent Vibrio cholerae.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA11017987–17992. 10.1073/pnas.1315647110

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 184

  SeitzP.BlokeschM. (2014). DNA transport across the outer and inner membranes of naturally transformable Vibrio cholerae is spatially but not temporally coupled.mBio5e01409–e01414. 10.1128/mBio.01409-14

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 185

  SeverinG. B.RamlidenM. S.HawverL. A.WangK.PellM. E.KienungerA. -K.et al (2018). Direct activation of a phospholipase by cyclic GMP-AMP in El Tor Vibrio cholerae.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.115E6048–E6055. 10.1073/pnas.1801233115

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 186

  SharmaA. K.PayneS. M. (2006). Induction of expression hfq by DksA is essential for Shigella flexneri virulence.Mol. Microbiol.62469–479. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05376.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 187

  SharpG. W. G.HynieS. (1971). Stimulation of intestinal adenyl cyclase by cholera toxin.Nature229266–269. 10.1038/229266a0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 188

  ShereK. D.SallustioS.ManessisA.D’AversaT. G.GoldbergM. B. (1997). Disruption of IcsP, the major Shigella protease that cleaves IcsA, accelerates actin-based motility.Mol. Microbiol.25451–462. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4681827.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 189

  ShimadaT.ArakawaE.ItohK.OkitsuT.MatsushimaA.AsaiY.et al (1994). Extended serotyping scheme for Vibrio cholerae.Curr. Microbiol.28175–178. 10.1007/BF01571061

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 190

  ShimadaT.BridierA.BriandetR.IshihamaA. (2011). Novel roles of LeuO in transcription regulation of E. coli genome: antagonistic interplay with the universal silencer H-NS.Mol. Microbiol.82378–397. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07818.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 191

  SilvaA. J.BenitezJ. A. (2004). Transcriptional regulation of Vibrio cholerae hemagglutinin/protease by the cyclic AMP receptor protein and RpoS.J. Bacteriol.1866374–6382. 10.1128/JB.186.19.6374-6382.2004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 192

  SilvaA. J.SultanS. Z.LiangW.BenitezJ. A. (2008). Role of the histone-like nucleoid structuring protein in the regulation of rpoS and RpoS-dependent genes in Vibrio cholerae.J. Bacteriol.1907335–7345. 10.1128/JB.00360-08

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 193

  SinghP. K.BartalomejS.HartmannR.JeckelH.VidakovicL.NadellC. D.et al (2017). Vibrio cholerae combines individual and collective sensing to trigger biofilm dispersal.Curr. Biol.273359–3366. 10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.041

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 194

  StoebelD. M.FreeA.DormanC. J. (2008). Anti-silencing: overcoming H-NS-mediated repression of transcription in Gram-negative enteric bacteria.Microbiology1542533–2545. 10.1099/mic.0.2008/020693-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 195

  StonehouseE. A.HulbertR. R.NyeM. B.SkorupskiK.TaylorR. K. (2011). H-NS binding and repression of the ctx promoter in Vibrio cholerae.J. Bacteriol.193979–988. 10.1128/JB.01343-09

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 196

  SuzukiT.MikiH.TakenawaT.SasakawaC. (1998). Neural Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein is implicated in the actin-based motility of Shigella flexneri.EMBO J.172767–2776. 10.1093/emboj/17.10.2767

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 197

  SuzukiT.SagaS.SasakawaC. (1996). Functional analysis of Shigella VirG domains essential for interaction with vinculin and actin-based motility.J. Biol. Chem.27121878–21885. 10.1074/jbc.271.36.21878

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 198

  SyedK. A.BeyhanS.CorreaN.QueenJ.LiuJ.PengF.et al (2009). The Vibrio cholerae flagellar regulatory hierarchy controls expression of virulence factors.J. Bacteriol.1916555–6570. 10.1128/JB.00949-09

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 199

  TaniyaT.MitobeJ.NakayamaS.MingshanQ.OkudaK.WatanabeH. (2003). Determination of the InvE binding site required for expression of IpaB of the Shigella sonnei virulence plasmid: involvement of a ParB boxA-like sequence.J. Bacteriol.1855158–5165. 10.1128/JB.185.17.5158-5165.2003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 200

  TaylorR. K.MillerV. L.FurlongD. B.MekalanosJ. J. (1987). Use of phoA gene fusions to identify a pilus colonization factor coordinately regulated with cholera toxin.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.842833–2837. 10.1073/pnas.84.9.2833

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 201

  TendengC.BadautC.KrinE.GounonP.NgoS.DanchinA.et al (2000). Isolation and characterization of vicH, encoding a new pleiotropic regulator in Vibrio cholerae.J. Bacteriol.1822026–2032. 10.1128/JB.182.7.2026-2032.2000

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 202

  TeohW. P.MatsonJ. S.DiRitaV. J. (2015). Regulated intramembrane proteolysis of the virulence activator TcpP in Vibrio cholerae is initiated by the tail-specific protease (Tsp).Mol. Microbiol.97822–831. 10.1111/mmi.13069

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 203

  ThomasS.WilliamsS. G.ManningP. A. (1995). Regulation of tcp genes in classical and El Tor strains of Vibrio cholerae O1.Gene16643–48. 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00610-X

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 204

  TobeT.YoshikawaM.MizunoT.SasakawaC. (1993). Transcriptional control of the invasion regulatory gene virB of Shigella flexneri: activation by virF and repression by H-NS.J. Bacteriol.1756142–6149. 10.1128/jb.175.19.6142-6149.1993

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 205

  TobeT.YoshikawaM.SasakawaC. (1994). Deregulation of temperature-dependent transcription of the invasion regulatory gene, virB, in Shigella by rho mutation.Mol. Microbiol.12267–276. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb01015.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 206

  TobeT.YoshikawaM.SasakawaC. (1995). Thermoregulation of virB transcription in Shigella flexneri by sensing of changes in local DNA superhelicity.J. Bacteriol.1771094–1097. 10.1128/jb.177.4.1094-1097.1995

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 207

  TranC. N.GiangrossiM.ProssedaG.BrandiA.Di MartinoM. L.ColonnaB.et al (2011). A multifactor regulatory circuit involving H-NS, VirF and an antisense RNA modulates transcription of the virulence gene icsA of Shigella flexneri.Nucleic Acids Res.398122–8134. 10.1093/nar/gkr521

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 208

  TsouA. M.LiuZ.CaiT.ZhuJ. (2011). The VarS/VarA two-component system modules the activity of the Vibrio cholerae quorum-sensing transcriptional regulator HapR.Microbiol.1571620–1628. 10.1099/mic.0.046235-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 209

  TurnerE. C.DormanC. J. (2007). H-NS antagonism in Shigella flexneri by VirB, a virulence gene transcription regulator that is closely related to plasmid partition factors.J. Bacteriol.1893403–3413. 10.1128/JB.01813-06

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 210

  ValM. E.BouvierM.CamposJ.SherrattD.CornetF.MazelD.et al (2005). The single-stranded genome of phage CTX is the form used for integration into the genome of Vibrio cholerae.Mol. Cell19559–56610.1016/j.molcel.2005.07.002

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 211

  ValM. E.MarboutyM.de Lemos MartinsF.KennedyS. P.KembleH.BlandM. J.et al (2016). A checkpoint control orchestrates the replication of the two chromosomes of Vibrio cholerae.Sci. Adv.2:e1501914. 10.1126/sciadv.1501914

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 212

  Vergara-IrigarayM.FookesM. C.ThomsonN. R.TangC. M. (2014). RNA-seq analysis of the influence of anaerobiosis and FNR on Shigella flexneri.BMC Genomics15:438. 10.1186/1471-2164-15-438

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 213

  VerstraetenN.KnapenW. J.KintC. I.LiebensV.Van den BerghB.DewachterL.et al (2015). Obg and membrane depolarization are part of a microbial bet-hedging strategy that leads to antibiotic tolerance.Mol. Cell599–21. 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.011

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 214

  WaldorM. K.MekalanosJ. J. (1996). Lysogenic conversion by a filamentous phage encoding cholera toxin.Science2721910–1914. 10.1126/science.272.5270.1910

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 215

  WangH.AyalaJ. C.BenitezJ. A.SilvaA. J. (2012). Interaction of the histone-like nucleoid structuring protein and the general stress response regulator RpoS at Vibrio cholerae promoters that regulate motility and hemagglutinin/protease expression.J. Bacteriol.1941205–1215. 10.1128/JB.05900-11

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 216

  WangH.AyalaJ. C.BenitezJ. A.SilvaA. J. (2014). The LuxR-type regulator VpsT negatively controls the transcription of rpoS, encoding the general stress response regulator, in Vibrio cholerae biofilms.J. Bacteriol.1961020–1030. 10.1128/JB.00993-13

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 217

  WangH.AyalaJ. C.BenitezJ. A.SilvaA. J. (2015). RNA-Seq analysis identifies new genes regulated by the histone-like nucleoid structuring protein (H-NS) affecting Vibrio cholerae virulence, stress response and chemotaxis.PLoS One10:e0118295. 10.1371/journal.pone.0118295

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 218

  WassefJ. S.KerenD. F.MaillouxJ. L. (1989). Role of M cells in initial antigen up take and in ulcer formation in the rabbit intestinal loop model of shigellosis.Infect. Immun.57858–863.

  • Google Scholar

• 219

  WatanabeH.ArakawaE.ItoK.KatoJ.NakamuraA. (1990). Genetic analysis of an invasion region by use of a Tn3-lac transposon and identification of a second positive regulator gene, invE, for cell invasion of Shigella sonnei: significant homology of invE with ParB of plasmid P1.J. Bacteriol.172619–629. 10.1128/jb.172.2.619-629.1990

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 220

  Weatherspoon-GriffinN.PickerM. A.PewK. L.ParkH. S.GineteD. R.KarneyM. M.et al (2018). Insights into transcriptional silencing and anti-silencing in Shigella flexneri: a detailed molecular analysis of the icsP virulence locus.Mol. Microbiol.108505–518. 10.1111/mmi.13932

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 221

  WeinerA.MelloukN.Lopez-MonteroN.ChangY. -Y.SouqueC.SchmittC.et al (2016). Macropinosomes are key players in early Shigella invasion and vacuolar escape in epithelial cells.PLoS Pathog.12:e1005602. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005602

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 222

  WelchM. D.WayM. (2013). Arp2/3-mediated actin-based motility: a tail of pathogen abuse.Cell Host Microbe14242–255. 10.1016/j.chom.2013.08.011

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 223

  WillW. R.NavarreW. W.FangF. C. (2015). Integrated circuits: how transcriptional silencing and counter-silencing facilitate bacterial evolution.Curr. Opin. Microbiol.238–13. 10.1016/j.mib.2014.10.005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 224

  WingH. J.YanA. W.GoldmanS. R.GoldbergM. B. (2004). Regulation of IcsP, the outer membrane protease of the Shigella actin tail assembly protein IcsA, by virulence plasmid regulators VirF and VirB.J. Bacteriol.186699–705. 10.1128/JB.186.3.699-705.2004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 225

  WuR.ZhaoM.LiJ.GaoH.KanB.LiangW. (2015). Direct regulation of the natural competence regulator gene tfoX by cyclic AMP (cAMP) and cAMP receptor protein (CRP) in Vibrios.Sci. Rep.5:14921. 10.1038/srep14921

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 226

  YamamotoS.IzumiyaH.MitobeJ.MoritaM.ArakawaE.OhnishiM.et al (2011). Identification of a chitin-induced small RNA that regulates translation of the tfoX gene, encoding a positive regulator of natural competence in Vibrio cholerae.J. Bacteriol.1931953–1965. 10.1128/JB.01340-10.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 227

  YamamotoS.MitobeJ.IshikawaT.WaiS. N.OhnishiM.WatanabeH.et al (2014). Regulation of natural competence by the orphan two-component system sensor kinase ChiS involves a non-canonical transmembrane regulator in Vibrio cholerae.Mol. Microbiol.91326–347. 10.1111/mmi.12462

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 228

  YangM.FreyE. M.LiuZ.BisharR.ZhuJ. (2010). The virulence transcriptional activator AphA enhances biofilm formation by Vibrio cholerae by activating the expression of the biofilm regulator VpsT.Infect. Immun.78697–703. 10.1128/IAI.00429-09

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 229

  YildizF. H.SchoolnikG. K. (1998). Role of rpoS in stress survival and virulence of Vibrio cholerae.J. Bacteriol.180773–784

  • Google Scholar

• 230

  YuR. R.DiRitaV. J. (1999). Analysis of an autoregulatory loop controlling ToxT, cholera toxin, and toxin-coregulated pilus production in Vibrio cholerae.J. Bacteriol.1812584–2592.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 231

  YuR. R.DiRitaV. J. (2002). Regulation of gene expression in Vibrio cholerae by ToxT involves both antirepression and RNA polymerase stimulation.Mol. Microbiol.43119–134. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02721.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 232

  ZagagliaC.CasalinoM.ColonnaB.ContiC.CalconiA.NicolettiM. (1991). Virulence plasmids of enteroinvasive Escherichia coli and Shigella flexneri integrate into a specific site on the host chromosome: integration greatly reduces expression of plasmid-carried virulence genes.Infect. Immun.59792–799.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 233

  Zamorano-SánchezD.FongJ. C.KilicS.ErillI.YildizF. H. (2015). Identification and characterization of VpsR and VpsT binding sites in Vibrio cholerae.J. Bacteriol.1971221–1235. 10.1128/JB.02439-14

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 234

  ZhangY.MühlenS.OatesC. V.PearsonJ. S.HartlandE. L. (2016). Identification of a distinct substrate-binding domain in the bacterial cysteine methyltransferase effectors NleE and OspZ.J. Biol. Chem.29120149–20162. 10.1074/jbc.M116.734079

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 235

  ZhaoW.CaroF.RobinsW.MekalanosJ. J. (2018). Antagonism toward the intestinal microbiota and its effect on Vibrio cholerae virulence.Science359210–213. 10.1126/science.aap8775.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 236

  ZhuJ.MillerM. B.VanceR. E.DziejmanM.BasslerB. L.MekalanosJ. J. (2002). Quorum-sensing regulators control virulence gene expression in Vibrio cholerae.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.993129–3134. 10.1073/pnas.052694299

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 237

  ZurawskiD. V.MumyK. L.BadeaL.PrenticeJ. A.HartlandE. L.McCormickB. A.et al (2008). The NleE/OspZ family of effector proteins is required for polymorphonuclear transepithelial migration, a characteristic shared by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli and Shigella flexneri infections.Infect. Immun.76369–379. 10.1128/IAI.00684-07

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 238

  ZychlinskyA.PrevostM. C.SansonettiP. J. (1992). Shigella flexneri induces apoptosis in infected macrophages.Nature358167–169. 10.1038/358167a0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar