AUTHOR=Kers Jannigje Gerdien , Saccenti Edoardo 

TITLE=The Power of Microbiome Studies: Some Considerations on Which Alpha and Beta Metrics to Use and How to Report Results

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Microbiology

VOLUME=Volume 12 - 2021

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.796025

DOI=10.3389/fmicb.2021.796025

ISSN=1664-302X

ABSTRACT=Background: Since sequencing techniques become less expensive, larger sample sizes are applicable for microbiota studies. The aim of this study is to show how, and to what extent, different diversity metrics and different compositions of the microbiota influence the needed sample size to observed dissimilar groups. Empirical 16S rRNA amplicon sequence data obtained from animal experiments, observational human data, and simulated data was used to perform retrospective power calculations. A wide variation of alpha diversity and beta diversity metrics were used to compare the different microbiota data sets and the effect on the sample size. Results: Our data showed that beta diversity metrics are most sensitive to observe differences compared to alpha diversity metrics. The structure of the data influenced which alpha metrics are most sensitive. Regarding beta diversity, the Bray-Curtis metric is in general most sensitive to observe differences between groups, resulting in lower sample size and potential publication bias. Conclusions: We recommend to perform power calculations and to use multiple diversity metrics as an outcome measure. To improve microbiota studies awareness needs to be raised on the sensitivity and bias for microbiota research outcomes created by the used metrics rather than biological differences.