<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1285466</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Effects of guanidinoacetic acid on <italic>in vitro</italic> rumen fermentation and microflora structure and predicted gene function</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>Chenyang</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>Manlin</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2166871/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Ju</surname> <given-names>Ji</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2106692/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>Liu</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Runze</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>Ming</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Yongjie</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Bao</surname> <given-names>Hailin</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Bao</surname> <given-names>Meili</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>College of Animal Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia Minzu University</institution>, <addr-line>Tongliao</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Horqin Left Wing Rear Banner Ethnic Vocational and Technical School</institution>, <addr-line>Tongliao</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0001">
<p>Edited by: Mostafa Sayed A. Khattab, National Research Centre, Egypt</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0002">
<p>Reviewed by: Aziz Ur Rahman Muhammad, University of Agriculture, Pakistan; Long Guo, Lanzhou University, China</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Manlin Wei, <email>weimanlin@163.com</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>09</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1285466</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>30</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>11</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2024 Dong, Wei, Ju, Du, Zhang, Xiao, Zheng, Bao and Bao.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Dong, Wei, Ju, Du, Zhang, Xiao, Zheng, Bao and Bao</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>The fermentation substrate was supplemented with 0% guanidinoacetic acid (GAA) (control group, CON), 0.2% GAA (GAA02), 0.4% GAA (GAA04), 0.6% GAA (GAA06) and 0.8% GAA (GAA08) for 48&#x2009;h of <italic>in vitro</italic> fermentation. Gas production was recorded at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48&#x2009;h of fermentation. The gas was collected, and the proportions (%, v/v) of H<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> were determined. The rumen fermentation parameters, including pH, ammonia nitrogen (NH<sub>3</sub>-N), microbial protein (MCP) and volatile fatty acids (VFAs), were also determined. Furthermore, the bacterial community structure was analyzed through 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing. The gene functions were predicted using PICRUSt1 according to the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). The results showed that with the increase in GAA supplementation levels, the MCP and the concentration of rumen propionate were significantly increased, while the concentration of isovalerate was significantly decreased (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05). The results of microbial diversity and composition showed that the Shannon index was significantly decreased by supplementation with GAA at different levels (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05), but the relative abundance of <italic>norank_f_F082</italic> and <italic>Papillibacter</italic> in the GAA06 group was significantly increased (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05). Especially in group GAA08, the relative abundances of Bacteroidota, <italic>Prevotella</italic> and <italic>Prevotellaceae_UCG-001</italic> were significantly increased (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05). The results of gene function prediction showed that the relative abundances of the functions of flagellar assembly, bacterial chemotaxis, plant&#x2013;pathogen interaction, mismatch repair and nucleotide excision repair were significantly decreased (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05), but the relative abundances of bile secretion and protein digestion and absorption were significantly increased (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05). In conclusion, supplementation with 0.8% GAA enhanced <italic>in vitro</italic> rumen fermentation parameters, increased the relative abundance of <italic>Prevotella</italic> and <italic>Prevotellaceae_UCG-001</italic> in the rumen, and increased the metabolic pathways of bile secretion and protein digestion and absorption.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>gas production</kwd>
<kwd>fermentation parameters</kwd>
<kwd>rumen microorganisms</kwd>
<kwd>gene function</kwd>
<kwd>metabolic pathway 1</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="6"/>
<table-count count="5"/>
<equation-count count="1"/>
<ref-count count="75"/>
<page-count count="13"/>
<word-count count="8881"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Microorganisms in Vertebrate Digestive Systems</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Creatine is phosphorylated to produce phosphocreatine, which can provide energy for cell activities. Creatine produced inside the body of animals can only meet 50&#x2013;70% of the body&#x2019;s needs, and the remaining amount should be supplemented by exogenous creatine (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Ostojic, 2017</xref>). Creatine has a high production cost, poor stability, and a low utilization rate of additional creatine in animals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Chamruspollert et al., 2002</xref>). Guanidinoacetic acid (GAA), the direct precursor of creatine biosynthesis in animals, has stable chemical properties and high biological value and is suitable for use as a feed additive (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Baker, 2009</xref>). Currently, GAA, as a nutritional feed additive, has been approved for use in animals by the European Food Safety Authority (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Poaa, 2016</xref>) and the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">MOA Ministry of Agriculture (PRC), 2014</xref>). Supplementation of GAA in poultry diets was proven to enhance the feed conversion rate and muscle quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Lemme et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Khalil et al., 2021</xref>), as well as liver antioxidant capacity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref74">Zhao et al., 2021</xref>) and muscle energy metabolism (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Michiels et al., 2012</xref>). In addition, GAA supplementation can significantly increase the average daily feed intake, feed conversion and lean meat percentage of pigs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Jayaraman et al., 2018</xref>) and improve carcass traits and meat quality by reducing the mandibular fat index and changing muscle fiber characteristics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref75">Zhu et al., 2020</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Liu et al. (2021)</xref> reported that dietary supplementation with 0.6&#x2009;g/kg GAA significantly increased the body weight and average daily gain of Angus bulls.</p>
<p>In fact, the function of the rumen is very important for nutrition. Rumen microbes can degrade protein in feed to provide amino acids as a nitrogen source for the body (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Sari et al., 2022</xref>) and digest carbohydrates to produce VFAs as an energy source (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref64">Wilk et al., 2021</xref>). Research on GAA has mainly focused on animal growth, meat quality, and antioxidant properties of poultry and pigs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Lemme et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Jayaraman et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Khalil et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref74">Zhao et al., 2021</xref>). However, only a few studies have investigated the effect of adding GAA on ruminants, and the effect of GAA on rumen fermentation and rumen microflora is unclear. Therefore, an <italic>in vitro</italic> experiment was carried out to study the effects of different levels of GAA on rumen gas production, gas composition and fermentation parameters, as well as the structure and gene function of rumen microflora through 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing technology, to provide a reference for the use of GAA in ruminant feed.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<p>The GAA used in the experiment was provided by Beijing Gendone Biotechnology Co., LTD. GAA is a white powder with 98% purity. All procedures in this study were approved by the Laboratory Animal Ethics Committee of Inner Mongolia Minzu University (protocol number: 2018090516001).</p>
<sec id="sec3">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Experimental animals and design</title>
<p>Four healthy Simmental hybrid female cattle (500&#x2009;kg&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;30&#x2009;kg) equipped with permanent rumen fistulas were selected as rumen fluid donors, and rumen fluid was collected from the fistulas for <italic>in vitro</italic> fermentation experiments. The basal diet of cattle was formulated according to the NRC (2016), and cattle were fed twice a day and allowed to drink freely. The ingredients and nutrients of the diet for the cattle are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>. The experiment adopted a single-factor experimental design, with 0% (control group, CON), 0.2% (GAA02), 0.4% (GAA04), 0.6% (GAA06), and 0.8% (GAA08) GAA supplemented to the fermentation substrate (same as the diet of fistula cattle), with three replicates in each group.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Composition and nutrient composition of the diet for cattle with fistulas (dry matter basis).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Ingredients</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Content (%)</th>
<th align="left" valign="middle">Nutrients<sup>2</sup></th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Content (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Corn stalk</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">60.00</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">NE/MJ&#x00B7;kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.84</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Corn</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16.20</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Dry Matter, DM</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">89.12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Soybean meal</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12.80</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Crude protein, CP</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13.19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Corn germ meal</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.20</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Ether extract, EE</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Distillers dried grains with soluble</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.60</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Neutral detergent fiber, NDF</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">47.17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Limestone</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.96</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Acid detergent fiber, ADF</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">34.87</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Sodium bicarbonate</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.72</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Calcium hydro phosphate</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.84</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Salt</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.68</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Premix<sup>1</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.00</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Total</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">100.00</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>1. Premix provided per kg of diet: VA 320000&#x2009;IU, VD 8000&#x2009;IU, VE 2200&#x2009;IU, Cu 710&#x2009;mg, Fe 900&#x2009;mg, Mn 900&#x2009;mg, Zn 1,400&#x2009;mg, Se 60&#x2009;mg, I 25&#x2009;mg, and Co 35&#x2009;mg. 2. The comprehensive net energy is the calculated value, and the nutrient level is the measured value.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<label>2.2</label>
<title><italic>In vitro</italic> fermentation experiment</title>
<p>The <italic>in vitro</italic> experiment was carried out according to the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Menke et al. (1979)</xref>. Approximately 500&#x2009;mg (dry matter basis) of fermentation substrate (same as the diet of fistula cattle) was weighed and transferred into a glass syringe with a volume of 100&#x2009;mL, which was calibrated (model HFT000025, H&#x00E4;berle, Germany). The rumen fluid was collected from the 4 fistulae cattle before the morning feeding, filtered with four layers of gauze, mixed into a preheated water bath at 39&#x00B0;C and saturated with CO<sub>2</sub>. Approximately 50&#x2009;mL of culture solution was added to a glass syringe containing the substrate and preheated to 39&#x00B0;C, and the initial volume of each glass syringe was recorded for calibration. Afterwards, the glass syringe was sealed and placed in a water bath oscillator at a constant temperature of 39&#x00B0;C and shaken at a speed of 120&#x2009;r/min. The volume of the gas in the glass syringe was read and recorded at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 36, and 48&#x2009;h. The gas in each glass syringe was collected into a 200&#x2009;mL aluminum foil gas sampling bag (Shanghai Huibin Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).</p>
<p>According to the model proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">&#x00D8;rskov and Mcdonald (1979)</xref>, SAS 8.0 software was used for analysis, and dynamic fermentation parameters were calculated:</p>
<disp-formula id="E1">
<mml:math id="M1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GP</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi>
<mml:mspace width="thickmathspace"/>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ct</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>In the formula, GP is the cumulative gas production of the sample at time point t (mL); B is the theoretical maximum gas production of the sample (mL); C is the gas production rate of the sample (mL&#x00B7;h<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>); and T is the cultivation time (h).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Sample collection</title>
<p>After 48&#x2009;h of <italic>in vitro</italic> fermentation, the glass syringe was quickly removed from the water bath oscillator and placed in an ice bath to terminate the fermentation. All fermentation fluid was collected in a 50&#x2009;mL centrifuge tube, and the pH was immediately measured. Then, the fermentation fluid was frozen and stored in a&#x2009;&#x2212;&#x2009;20&#x00B0;C refrigerator for ammonia nitrogen (NH<sub>3</sub>-N), microbial protein (MCP), and volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration determinations. A total of 1.5&#x2009;mL fermentation fluid was collected into a cryotube and kept at &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C for microbial flora determination of the V3-V4 area by 16S rRNA sequencing technology.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Determination of dietary indices</title>
<p>The diet sample was continuously dried in a drying oven at 65&#x00B0;C for 48&#x2009;h to make an air-dried sample, and the DM content was then determined by drying at 105&#x00B0;C to constant weight (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Ju et al., 2023</xref>). The crude protein (CP) and ether extract (EE) contents were determined using the standard Association of Official Analytical Chemists procedures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">AOAC, 1990</xref>). The neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) contents were quantified using the method described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Van Soest et al. (1991)</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Determination of the rumen fermentation parameters</title>
<p>The proportions (%, v/v) of H<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> in the rumen gas were determined by gas chromatography (TP-2060&#x2009;T, Beijing Analytical Instrument Co., Ltd.). Instrument conditions: TCD detector, column model TDX-01, 1&#x2009;m&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;3&#x2009;mm&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;2&#x2009;mm, column temperature 120&#x00B0;C, detector temperature 150&#x00B0;C, injection port temperature 150&#x00B0;C, carrier gas argon, carrier gas flow rate 50&#x2009;mm/min. The standard gas consisted of 24.80% CH<sub>4</sub>, 65.10% CO<sub>2</sub>, 2.01% H<sub>2</sub>, 3.00% O<sub>2</sub> and 5.00% N<sub>2</sub>, and the detection volume was 100&#x2009;&#x03BC;L. Rumen pH was determined using a portable pH meter (SX-620). The concentrations of rumen NH<sub>3</sub>-N, MCP and VFA were determined according to the methods of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Broderick and Kang (1980)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Makkar et al. (1982)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref66">Wu et al. (2013)</xref>, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>DNA extraction and PCR amplification</title>
<p>Total microbial genomic DNA was extracted from rumen fluid samples using the E.Z.N.A.&#x00AE; soil DNA Kit (Omega Biotek, Norcross, GA, USA) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions. The quality and concentration of DNA were determined by 1.0% agarose gel electrophoresis and a NanoDrop&#x00AE; ND-2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific Inc., USA) and kept at &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C prior to further use. The hypervariable region V3-V4 of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified with primer pairs 338F (5&#x2032;-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3&#x2032;) and 806R (5&#x2032;-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3&#x2032;) by an ABI GeneAmp&#x00AE; 9,700 PCR thermocycler (ABI, CA, USA) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Liu et al., 2016</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>Illumina MiSeq sequencing and data processing</title>
<p>Purified amplicons were pooled in equimolar amounts and paired-end sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq PE300 platform (Illumina, San Diego, USA) according to the standard protocols by Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Raw FASTQ files were demultiplexed using an in-house Perl script and then quality-filtered by fastp version 0.19.6 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Chen et al., 2018</xref>) and merged by FLASH version 1.2.7 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Mago&#x010D; and Salzberg, 2011</xref>). Then, the optimized sequences were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using UPARSE 7.1 with a 97% sequence similarity level (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Stackebrandt and Goebel, 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Edgar, 2013</xref>). The taxonomy of each OTU representative sequence was analyzed by RDP Classifier version 2.2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Wang et al., 2007</xref>) against the 16S rRNA gene database (Silva v138). Based on the OTU information, rarefaction curves, Venn diagrams and alpha diversity indices, including observed OTUs, were calculated with Mothur v1.30.1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Schloss et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Segata et al., 2011</xref>). Co-occurrence networks were constructed to explore the internal community relationships across the samples (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Barberan et al., 2012</xref>). Metagenomic function was predicted by PICRUSt1 based on representative OTU sequences. GraphPad Prism (version 9, IBM, Armonk, NY, United States) was used to map the metabolic pathway results of KEGG. The raw sequencing data of this study are available in the NCBI SRA database with the BioProject ID of PRJNA1011887.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<label>2.8</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>The experimental data and the dynamic fermentation parameters were assessed by the one-way ANOVA procedure of John&#x2019;s Macintosh Project version 13 software (SAS Institute, Japan), and multiple comparisons were made using Duncan&#x2019;s test. Data are expressed as the mean and standard error (SEM). <italic>P</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05 was considered statistically significant, and 0.05&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.10 was considered to indicate a significant difference in trend.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec11">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec12">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Effect of guanidinoacetic acid on <italic>in vitro</italic> gas production and gas parameters</title>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, gas production in the GAA groups decreased to varying degrees compared with that in the CON group from 12&#x2009;h to 48&#x2009;h, but there was no significant difference in total gas production at 48&#x2009;h (GP<sub>48 h</sub>) between all groups (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>). After model prediction based on actual gas production, the theoretical maximum gas production (B) and gas production rate (C) of each group were obtained, which showed no significant difference between all groups (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05). The proportions of H<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> in the GAA groups were not significantly different (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p><italic>In vitro</italic> gas production plots from 0&#x2009;~&#x2009;48&#x2009;h.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1285466-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of GAA on rumen fermentation gas parameters.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Items</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">CON</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">GAA02</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">GAA04</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">GAA06</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">GAA08</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SEM</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>p</italic> value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">GP<sub>48 h</sub> /(mL)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">100.70</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">92.85</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">97.32</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">97.13</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">95.07</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.142</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.196</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">B/(mL)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">118.23</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">107.14</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">116.01</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">114.34</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">110.67</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.514</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.256</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">C/mL&#x00B7;h<sup>&#x2212;1</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.04</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.04</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.04</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.04</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.05</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.276</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">H<sub>2</sub> /%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.02</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.02</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.02</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.02</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.02</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.002</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.580</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">CH<sub>4</sub> /%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14.58</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14.75</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14.19</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14.75</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14.93</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.387</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.715</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">CO<sub>2</sub> /%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">77.78</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">80.73</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">78.57</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">79.07</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">79.38</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.616</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.768</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>GP, gas production; B, theoretical maximum gas production; C, gas production rate. SEM, standard error of the mean.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Effect of guanidinoacetic acid on rumen fermentation parameters</title>
<p>According to <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab3">Table 3</xref>, after 48&#x2009;h of <italic>in vitro</italic> fermentation, the MCP content in the GAA group was significantly higher than that in the CON group (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05), with the GAA08 group having the highest MCP content (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.006). The concentration of propionate significantly increased with increasing GAA addition level compared with that in the CON group (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05), while the concentration of isovalerate significantly decreased (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05). There was no significant change in acetate, but the ratio of acetate to propionate (A/P) showed a decreasing trend due to the increase in propionate (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.055). Moreover, there were no significant differences in pH, NH<sub>3</sub>-N, butyrate, isobutyrate, valerate, or total volatile fatty acid (TVFA) concentrations between the groups (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of GAA on rumen fermentation parameters.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Items</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">CON</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">GAA02</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">GAA04</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">GAA06</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">GAA08</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SEM</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>p</italic> value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">pH</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.11</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.09</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.13</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.12</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.033</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.877</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">NH<sub>3</sub>-N/(mg&#x00B7;dL<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">31.99</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">33.07</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">32.90</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">32.06</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">35.31</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.940</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.164</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">MCP/(mg&#x00B7;dL<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">15.35<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">24.35<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">22.32<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">26.14<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">26.85<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.742</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.006</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">TVFA/(mmol&#x00B7;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">47.34</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">46.35</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">46.69</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">48.04</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">46.77</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.275</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.985</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Acetate/%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">66.71</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">67.06</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">67.17</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">67.39</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">66.76</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.192</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.141</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Propionate/%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18.00<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18.25<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18.42<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18.35<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18.60<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.106</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Isobutyrate/%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.07</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.07</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.13</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.14</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.033</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.510</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Butyrate/%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.65</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.48</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.39</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.52</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.85</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.162</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.373</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Isovalerate/%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.56<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.20<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.00<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.74<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.70<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.147</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Valerate/%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.01</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.93</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.90</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.91</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.96</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.038</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.302</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">A/P</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.71</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.68</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.65</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.67</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.59</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.024</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.055</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>NH<sub>3</sub>-N, ammonia-N; MCP, microbial protein; TVFA, total volatile fatty acids; A/P, acetate/propionate; SEM, standard error of the mean. a, b, c in the same row, there is a statistically significant difference (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05).</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Effects of guanidinoacetic acid on rumen bacterial diversity and microbial community structure</title>
<sec id="sec15">
<label>3.3.1</label>
<title>Analysis of the rumen bacterial diversity</title>
<p>Three rumen fluid samples from each group were filtered by high-throughput sequencing to obtain 470,985 effective sequences. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A</xref>, the growth rate of the dilution curve slowed, indicating that the amount of sequencing data obtained thus far was sufficient to reflect the diversity of most species in the test samples. Based on the 97% similarity level, effective sequences were OTU clustered (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B</xref>), and a total of 2,479 OTUs were obtained. The number of OTUs in CON group was 2096, GAA02 group was 2035, GAA04 group was 2058, GAA06 group was 2058, and GAA08 group was 2063. The total number of OTUs in the five groups was 1,606, among which the number of unique OTUs was 43, 37, 35, 46 and 34, accounting for 2.05, 1.82, 1.70, 2.23, and 1.65%, respectively. According to the above data, there were differences in the composition of rumen microflora after GAA addition. On the other hand, compared with the CON group, the Shannon index was significantly reduced by supplementation with GAA at different levels (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05), but the Chao index had no significant change (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figures 2C</xref>,<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">D</xref>), indicating that supplementation with GAA at different levels significantly impacted rumen microbial diversity.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Dilution curve analysis <bold>(A)</bold>, operational taxonomic unit (OTU) Venn analysis <bold>(B)</bold>, Shannon index bar graph <bold>(C)</bold> and Chao index bar graph <bold>(D)</bold>. CON, GAA 02, GAA 04, GAA 06, and GAA08 represent the control group (0%), 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8% groups, respectively. &#x002A;There is a statistically significant difference (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1285466-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<label>3.3.2</label>
<title>Structural difference analysis of the rumen microflora composition</title>
<p>After taxonomic annotation of species for each sample group, there were 7 phyla with relative abundances greater than 1% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab4">Table 4</xref>). They were Firmicutes, Bacteroidota, Actinobacteriota, Spirochaetota, Proteobacteria, Desulfobacterota and Verrucomicrobiota. Among them, Firmicutes and Bacteroidota were the dominant bacteria, and the total relative abundance of Firmicutes and Bacteroidota accounted for more than 91% in each group of bacteria. Compared with the CON group, the relative abundance of Firmicutes first increased and then decreased with increasing GAA addition (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.052), while the relative abundance of Bacteroidota first decreased and then increased. The other phyla with relative abundances greater than 1% did not show significant differences between all groups (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of GAA on the relative abundance of rumen microflora at the phylum level (%).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Items</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">CON</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">GAA02</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">GAA04</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">GAA06</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">GAA08</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SEM</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>p</italic> value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Firmicutes</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">53.31</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">59.89</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">56.86</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">57.79</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">47.29</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.671</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.052</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Bacteroidota</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">38.00<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">31.47<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">35.76<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">36.00<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">44.10<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.203</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.027</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Actinobacteriota</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.03</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.90</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.79</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.63</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.66</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.321</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.893</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Spirochaetota</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.52</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.88</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.25</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.89</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.047</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.083</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Proteobacteria</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.75</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.63</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.01</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.56</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.93</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.166</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.738</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Desulfobacterota</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.83</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.15</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.92</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.93</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.92</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.135</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.584</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Verrucomicrobiota</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.17</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.81</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.06</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.79</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.88</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.159</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.405</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>SEM, standard error of the mean; a, b, c in the same row, there is a statistically significant difference (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05).</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>A total of 329 genera were obtained after taxonomic annotation of the species. <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab5">Table 5</xref> shows the top 15 genera in relative abundance. <italic>Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group</italic> was the dominant bacteria in the rumen, and its relative abundance accounted for more than 15% of all groups of bacteria. Compared with those in the CON group, the relative abundances of <italic>norank_f__F082</italic> (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.023) and <italic>Papillibacter</italic> (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.014) in the GAA06 group were significantly increased. The relative abundances of <italic>Prevotella</italic> (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.026) and <italic>Prevotellaceae_UCG-001</italic> (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.046) in the GAA08 group were significantly increased. For <italic>Christensenellaceae_R-7_group</italic>, <italic>norank_f__UCG-011</italic>, <italic>Succiniclasticum</italic>, <italic>NK4A214_group</italic>, <italic>Lachnospiraceae_NK3A20_group</italic>, <italic>Saccharofermentans</italic>, <italic>norank_f__Eubacterium_coprostanoligenes_group</italic>, <italic>Family_XIII_AD3011_group</italic>, <italic>Acetitomaculum</italic> and <italic>norank_f__Muribaculaceae</italic>, there were no significant differences in the relative abundance of the nine bacteria in all groups (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of GAA on the relative abundance of rumen microflora at the genus level (%).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Items</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">CON</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">GAA02</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">GAA04</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">GAA06</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">GAA08</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">SEM</th>
<th align="center" valign="top"><italic>p</italic> value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<italic>Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group</italic>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18.01</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">15.91</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16.59</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18.69</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">15.64</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.037</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.239</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<italic>Prevotella</italic>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.14<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.79<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.73<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.17<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13.13<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.616</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.026</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Christensenellaceae_R-7_group</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.18</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.43</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.55</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.69</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.66</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.567</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.138</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<italic>norank_f__UCG-011</italic>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.62</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.54</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.17</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.81</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.84</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.267</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.359</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<italic>Succiniclasticum</italic>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.28</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.81</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.17</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.63</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.70</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.273</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.558</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<italic>norank_f__F082</italic>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.32<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.13<sup>d</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.23<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.75<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.08<sup>d</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.363</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.023</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<italic>NK4A214_group</italic>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.55</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.91</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.65</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.27</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.30</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.249</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.144</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<italic>Lachnospiraceae_NK3A20_group</italic>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.65</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.06</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.85</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.24</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.42</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.303</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.388</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<italic>Papillibacter</italic>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.43<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.08<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.07<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.03<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.13<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.176</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.014</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<italic>Saccharofermentans</italic>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.11</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.07</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.22</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.38</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.05</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.103</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.203</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<italic>norank_f_Eubacterium_coprostanoligenes_group</italic>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.94</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.95</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.95</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.77</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.63</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.248</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.847</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<italic>Family_XIII_AD3011_group</italic>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.75</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.05</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.78</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.30</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.38</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.238</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.237</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<italic>Acetitomaculum</italic>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.42</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.56</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.56</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.69</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.34</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.137</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.447</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<italic>Prevotellaceae_UCG-001</italic>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.17<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.87<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.36<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.15<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.39<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.310</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.046</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">
<italic>norank_f__Muribaculaceae</italic>
</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.19</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.19</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.24</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.91</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.423</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.266</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>SEM, standard error of the mean; a, b, c, d in the same row, there is a statistically significant difference (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05). The intermediate rank in the taxonomic lineage has no scientific name labeled norank.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17">
<label>3.3.3</label>
<title>Correlation of the rumen fermentation parameters with the microbial community</title>
<p>The correlation between relative abundance and fermentation parameters of the top 16 bacterial genera (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). NH<sub>3</sub>-N was negatively associated with the relative abundance of <italic>norank_f__F082</italic> and <italic>Lachnospiraceae_NK3A20_group</italic> (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05), and it was also positively correlated with the relative abundance of <italic>Prevotella</italic> and <italic>Prevotellaceae_UCG-001</italic> (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05). Propionate was negatively associated with the relative abundance of <italic>norank_f__F082</italic> (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05), and it was also positively correlated with the relative abundance of <italic>Prevotellaceae_UCG-001</italic> (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05). The relative abundance of <italic>Family_XIII_AD3011_group</italic> correlated positively with isovalerate (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05), and the relative abundance of <italic>Prevotella</italic> correlated positively with butyrate (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05). The relative abundance of <italic>Succiniclasticum</italic> correlated negatively with pH (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlation of the rumen fermentation parameters with the microbial community. The R values are shown in different colors in the graph, and the legend on the right is the color interval of the different R values. &#x002A;<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x2264;&#x2009;0.05.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1285466-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18">
<label>3.3.4</label>
<title>Network plot of the rumen microbial species correlation</title>
<p>The species correlation network diagram mostly reflects the species correlation at various classification levels under certain environmental conditions and calculates the Spearman rank and other correlation coefficients between species. Correlation network analysis was performed on the top 15 species with total abundance at the genus level (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>), where 10 genera belong to Firmicutes and 5 genera belong to Bacteroidota. <italic>Prevotella</italic> was positively correlated with <italic>Prevotellaceae_UCG-001</italic>, and both were negatively correlated with other bacteria. The number of bacterial nodes exceeded 7, including <italic>NK4A214_group</italic>, <italic>Prevotella</italic>, <italic>Prevotellaceae_UCG-001</italic> and <italic>Christensenellaceae_R-7_group</italic>.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Network plot of species correlation at the genus level. The size of the nodes in the figure represents species abundance, the red line represents a positive correlation, and the green line represents a negative correlation. The thicker the line, the higher the correlation between species; the more lines there are, the more closely related the species is to other species.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1285466-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Effect of guanidinoacetic acid on gene function prediction in rumen bacteria</title>
<p>PICRUSt1 was used to predict gene function based on 16S amplicon sequencing results to evaluate the functional characteristics of rumen microbiota supplemented with different levels of GAA. A total of six primary metabolic pathway levels were obtained through KEGG database comparison (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>), including cellular processes, environmental information processing, genetic information processing, human diseases, metabolism, and organismal systems. The results showed that the expression of cellular processes and genetic information processing in the GAA08 group was downregulated (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Primary metabolic pathway. Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05). Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1285466-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Further analysis of the metabolic pathway is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>. In the GAA08 group, the expression of flagellar assembly, bacterial chemotaxis, plant pathogen interaction, mismatch repair, and nucleotide exclusion repair were all downregulated (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05). However, the expression of bile secretion and protein digestion and absorption in the GAA08 group was upregulated (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig6">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p>The tertiary metabolic pathway of cell motility <bold>(A,B)</bold>, tertiary metabolic pathways of the digestive system <bold>(C&#x2013;F)</bold>, tertiary metabolic pathways of environmental adaptation <bold>(G,H)</bold>, and tertiary metabolic pathways of replication and repair <bold>(I&#x2013;L)</bold>. Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1285466-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="sec20">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p><italic>In vitro</italic> rumen-simulated fermentation techniques are commonly used to evaluate the extent of rumen microbial fermentation and the utilization of diets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref69">Yejun et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Grubje&#x0161;i&#x0107; et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Choi et al., 2021</xref>). Rumen microorganisms ferment carbohydrates to produce rumen gasses (H<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, CO<sub>2</sub>, etc.) and VFAs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Ju et al., 2023</xref>). Under the action of some microorganisms, these gasses also have a certain mutual transformation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Lv et al., 2022</xref>). Rumen gas production and gas composition reflect not only the digestion process of feed in the rumen but also the changes in rumen microorganisms and are usually affected by fermentation substrates and additives. It is obvious that substrate composition affects rumen fermentation kinetics. It has been shown that supplementing 0.4% GAA to a fermentation substrate with a ratio of concentrate to forage (C/F) of 7:3 can increase the total gas production after 24&#x2009;h of fermentation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Ren et al., 2023</xref>), and a C/F of 5:5 can also promote nutrient digestion and rumen fermentation in Angus bulls (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Li et al., 2020</xref>). Therefore, it is worth discussing the effect of GAA when the ratio of concentrate to forage is further reduced. In this experiment (with C/F 4:6), there was no significant difference in GP<sub>48 h</sub> between the GAA groups and the CON group, but the gas production in the GAA groups was numerically lower (<italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003E;&#x2009;0.05). In addition, the gas production rate is also an important indicator of rumen fermentation kinetics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref65">Wu et al., 2022</xref>). In this experiment, the theoretical maximum gas production (B in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>) and gas production rate (C in <xref ref-type="table" rid="tab2">Table 2</xref>) predicted by the model showed no significant differences between groups, and the gas proportions of H<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, and CO<sub>2</sub> did not change. Since rumen gas was mainly produced from carbohydrates in the diet, it is considered that GAA barely influenced carbohydrate digestion of the substrate with this C/F (4:6).</p>
<p>A relatively stable rumen environment is important for the colonization and function of rumen microorganisms; in general, the indicators examined include rumen pH, NH<sub>3</sub>-N and VFAs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Ma et al., 2022</xref>). Rumen pH is particularly important (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Ma, 2021</xref>) because it is also the result of the combined effect of rumen VFA and NH<sub>3</sub>-N. The rumen pH fluctuates from 5.5 to 7.5, which is conducive to rumen microorganisms and to the normal function of ruminants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Calsamiglia et al., 2008</xref>). In this experiment, the pH of the rumen in each group fluctuated within the normal range of 6.09&#x2013;6.13, indicating that GAA supplementation did not disrupt the balance of volatile acids and ammonia nitrogen and maintained the acid&#x2013;base environment, which was consistent with the results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Wales et al. (2004)</xref>.</p>
<p>The NH<sub>3</sub>-N concentration in the rumen is affected by the substrate&#x2019;s degradable protein content and the activity of rumen microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Zain et al., 2023</xref>). The optimal NH<sub>3</sub>-N concentration for rumen microorganism growth is generally within the range of 20&#x2013;50&#x2009;mg/dL under <italic>in vitro</italic> conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Satter and Slyter, 1974</xref>). The results of this experiment showed that the NH<sub>3</sub>-N concentrations of all groups were similar and fluctuated within the normal range from 31.99 to 35.31&#x2009;mg/dL, which means that microbial nitrogen sources were adequately supplied. Since GAA contains 35.86% nitrogen and does not affect the rumen ammonia nitrogen content but increases MCP, it is speculated that it promotes the conversion of NH<sub>3</sub>-N into MCP. The same result was reported in lambs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Ren et al., 2023</xref>). However, it may depend on more factors than the amount added. A decreased NH<sub>3</sub>-N concentration was also observed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Li et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Liu et al., 2021</xref>). Supplementation with GAA (from 300&#x2009;mg to 900&#x2009;mg/kg) even affected the growth performance and nutrient digestion of lambs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Liu et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Carbohydrates are fermented in the rumen and produce VFAs, which can meet 70&#x2013;80% of ruminant energy needs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Rey et al., 2014</xref>); therefore, carbohydrates are an important source of energy for ruminants. In addition, acetate and butyrate are important substances for milk fat synthesis, while propionate is an important precursor for glucose synthesis in gluconeogenesis, which is also mainly used for synthesizing body fat and lactose (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Li et al., 2023</xref>). The proportion of VFA depends on the rumen fermentation pattern, especially C/F. More acetic acid and less propionic acid are produced when C/F is low. To distinguish rumen fermentation patterns, when A/P is greater than 3, it is considered an acetate-type fermentation. Otherwise, it is a propionate-type fermentation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Gong, 2020</xref>). The lower C/F in this experiment was achieved by acetate-type fermentation, but the concentration of propionate significantly increased with GAA supplementation. Therefore, the A/P showed a decreasing trend due to the increase in propionate. This result was consistent with the report of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Liu et al. (2023)</xref>. This meant that GAA supplementation has a regulatory effect on the rumen fermentation pattern to perform propionate-type fermentation. In fact, propionate-type fermentation has important physiological significance in finishing cattle, such as the lowest heat consumption, less methane production and the highest energy conversion efficiency. This means that beef cattle can obtain more energy for weight gain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Xie et al., 2021</xref>). The effect of GAA on the rumen fermentation pattern may be attributed to rumen microorganisms. The results of 16S in this experiment indicated that GAA supplementation increased the abundance of <italic>Prevotella</italic> and <italic>Prevotellaceae_UCG-001</italic>, which are involved in propionate metabolism in the rumen, and thus led to an increase in the concentration of propionate.</p>
<p>Branched chain amino acids (valine, leucine, and proline) undergo oxidative deamination or decarboxylation by rumen microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Ren and Zhao, 2008</xref>), which produce corresponding isomeric acids (butyrate, isobutyrate, isovalerate, and valerate) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref73">Zhang et al., 2022</xref>). Among them, isovalerate is associated with fiber degradation and was reported to increase acetate, butyrate and TVFA in the rumen of Simmental cattle and reduce propionate, which leads to acetate-type fermentation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Liu et al., 2007</xref>). In this experiment, propionate significantly increased and isovalerate showed a significant downwards trend with increasing GAA addition. This means that isovaleric acid-related fiber degradation is weakened and propionic acid-related nonfiber carbohydrate degradation is enhanced. This was consistent with previous reports. However, GAA supplementation did not affect acetate and butyrate concentrations.</p>
<p>The rumen is a complex anaerobic fermentation system composed of various microorganisms with a high degree of microbial diversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Mizrahi and Jami, 2018</xref>). These microorganisms are important in maintaining the stability of the rumen environment, increasing the nutrient digestion rate and maintaining animal productivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Lin et al., 2018</xref>). Alpha diversity reflects the diversity within a specific ecosystem, the Shannon index is used to reflect microbial diversity, and the Chao index is an indicator of richness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref63">Wei et al., 2017</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">Shabat et al. (2016)</xref> found that the diversity of rumen microorganisms decreased while the concentration of propionate increased. In this study, the same results were found. As the level of GAA addition increased, the Shannon index decreased, but the Chao index did not show significant changes. This suggested that supplementation with different GAA levels may partially affect the diversity of the rumen microbiota.</p>
<p><italic>Firmicutes</italic> degrade dietary fiber to produce acetate and butyrate, while <italic>Bacteroidota</italic> mainly produces propionate through nonfibrous substance degradation. In this study, <italic>Firmicutes</italic> and <italic>Bacteroidota</italic> were also the dominant microbiota in the rumen, which was consistent with the results of other studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Lee et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref68">Yang et al., 2020</xref>). However, the relative abundance of <italic>Firmicutes</italic> showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing with GAA addition, while <italic>Bacteroidota</italic> showed a significant decrease at first and then increasing. The most obvious changes were observed within the GAA02 and GAA08 groups, and between them, they showed almost opposite results. This meant that the result may depend on the GAA level, and the 0.8% level may be a critical value. When the amount of GAA supplemented was 0.8%, <italic>Bacteroidota</italic> significantly increased, and the results of rumen volatile acids also indicated a significant increase in propionate concentration. This indicated that low levels of GAA may be beneficial for <italic>Firmicutes</italic> survival, while high levels of GAA are more suitable for <italic>Bacteroidota</italic> to degrade nonfibrous substances and produce more propionate.</p>
<p>Further research and analysis of the differences in genus-level communities revealed that <italic>Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group</italic> is the dominant genus in the rumen, which is the same as the reports of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Liu et al. (2022)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Ahmad et al. (2022)</xref>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Cox et al. (2014)</xref> found that <italic>Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group</italic> is a beneficial bacterium with intestinal protective functions that is mainly involved in the degradation of plant-based polysaccharides in the body, and its relative abundance is directly proportional to dietary fiber content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Fan et al., 2020</xref>). This indicates that GAA supplementation does not negatively impact dietary fiber degradation that can be used by beneficial dominant bacteria in the rumen. In this experiment, the addition of 0.6% GAA significantly increased <italic>norank_f__F082</italic> and <italic>Papillibacter</italic>. The <italic>norank_f__F082</italic> belongs to <italic>Bacteroides</italic> and mainly participates in nonstructural carbohydrate degradation. <italic>Papillibacter</italic> has been found to exist in the rumen in studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Ma et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref72">Zhang et al., 2022</xref>), but the functions of <italic>norank_f__F082</italic> and <italic>Papillibacter</italic> have not been reported. The relative abundance of <italic>Prevotella</italic> and <italic>Prevotellaceae_UCG-001</italic> was significantly increased when 0.8% GAA was supplemented. <italic>Prevotella</italic> and <italic>Prevotellaceae_UCG-001</italic> belong to the phylum <italic>Bacteroidei</italic>, among which <italic>Prevotella</italic> has a strong ability to degrade nonstructural carbohydrates and proteins and can ferment sugars through the acrylic and succinic acid pathways to produce propionate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Flinth, 2008</xref>). By examining the correlation between rumen fermentation parameters and microbial communities, propionate concentration was positively correlated with the relative abundance of <italic>Prevotellaceae_UCG-001</italic>. The increase in the relative abundance of <italic>Prevotella</italic> often leads to an increase in propionate content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Poudel et al., 2019</xref>). This also explains the increasing rumen propionate concentration with increasing GAA addition levels from the perspective of the microbial genus level.</p>
<p>The rumen microbiota is a complex ecosystem closely related to the biology of the host, and species interactions are crucial for the stability of the community in healthy symbiotic microbiota (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Clemente et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Faust et al., 2012</xref>). A network diagram was drawn based on the correlation between species to reflect the interactions between species in the sample. Ramayo-Caldas studied the relationship between gut microbes in 518 pigs (60&#x2009;days of age) through correlation network analysis and found that genus-level correlation network analysis revealed significant interactions between different genera of pig gut flora (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Ramayo-Caldas et al., 2016</xref>). <italic>Prevotella</italic> and <italic>Prevotellaceae_UCG-001</italic> showed a positive correlation, while the two were negatively correlated with other bacterial genera. This was consistent with the results of the genus-level relative abundance analysis above, where the addition of 0.8% GAA significantly increased the relative abundance of <italic>Prevotella</italic> and <italic>Prevotellaceae_UCG-001</italic> while decreasing the relative abundance of <italic>NK4A214_group</italic> and <italic>Christensenellaceae_R-7_group</italic>. Through correlation network analysis, it was found that <italic>NK4A214_group</italic>, <italic>Prevotella</italic>, <italic>Prevotellaceae_UCG-001</italic> and <italic>Christensenellaceae_R-7_group</italic> are important genera in the rumen microbiota, which may partially affect the stability of the rumen microbiota.</p>
<p>Rumen microorganisms participate in body metabolism and provide nutrients to the host by decomposing dietary nutrients, and the abundance and function of microflora are closely related to the host (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Vasta et al., 2019</xref>). Further analysis showed downregulated expression of flagellar assembly, bacterial chemotaxis and plant&#x2013;pathogen interaction in the GAA08 group. Flagellar assembly and bacterial chemotaxis are important in the bacterial adhesion process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">Wang, 2019</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref71">Zhang et al. (2022)</xref> showed that plant&#x2013;pathogen interactions mainly involve pathogenic microorganisms plundering nutrients from host cells for survival and reproduction, while host plants use various defense strategies to inhibit pathogen growth. This indicates that high GAA levels reduce the cell motility ability of bacteria and the plant&#x2013;pathogen interaction. In addition, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Hamana et al. (2012)</xref> showed that replication-and repair-related genes may help the body restore the molecular structure of genes and reduce the damage caused by mismatching biological molecules. In this experiment, the expression of mismatch repair and nucleotide excision repair in the GAA08 group was downregulated, indicating that supplementing high levels of GAA may reduce the body&#x2019;s ability to replicate and repair biomolecules. The relative abundance of bile secretion and protein digestion and absorption in the GAA08 group was significantly higher than that in the other groups. Based on the above results of MCP concentration and relative abundance of bacteria, the addition of 0.8% GAA promotes nutrient utilization, such as lipids and proteins, by rumen microorganisms, leading to an increase in these genes.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="sec21">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The results showed that when GAA was supplemented, the concentrations of MCP and propionate in the rumen could be significantly increased, but isovalerate was decreased. In addition, the relative abundances of Bacteroidota, <italic>Prevotella</italic> and <italic>Prevotellaceae_UCG-001</italic> could be significantly enhanced. The metabolic pathways related to bile secretion, protein digestion and absorption were increased. In conclusion, supplementation with 0.8% GAA can enhance <italic>in vitro</italic> rumen fermentation parameters and increase the relative abundance of bacteria related to nonfiber substance degradation, which would enable beef cattle to obtain more energy.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec22">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: NCBI - PRJNA1011887.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="ethics-statement" id="sec23">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The animal studies were approved by Laboratory Animal Ethics Committee of Inner Mongolia Minzu University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the owners for the participation of their animals in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec24">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>CD: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing &#x2013; original draft. MW: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. JJ: Conceptualization, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. LD: Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. RZ: Investigation, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. MX: Investigation, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. YZ: Visualization, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. HB: Visualization, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. MB: Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec25">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs &#x201C;Integrated Demonstration Project of Key Technologies of Cattle and Sheep Husbandry and Breeding in the Transitional Zone of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry&#x201D; (Nos. 16190050, 16200158, and 16210096) and Inner Mongolia Science and Technology Support Project (No. 2022YFXZ0015).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec26">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec100" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ahmad</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Age-dependent variations in rumen bacterial community of Mongolian cattle from weaning to adulthood</article-title>. <source>BMC Microbiol.</source> <volume>22</volume>:<fpage>213</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12866-022-02627-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll1">AOAC</collab></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <source>Methods of analysis</source>. <publisher-loc>Arlington, TX</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Association of Official Analytical Chemists</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baker</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Advances in protein&#x2013;amino acid nutrition of poultry</article-title>. <source>Amino Acids</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>29</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>41</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00726-008-0198-3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19009229</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barberan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bates</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Casamayor</surname> <given-names>E. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fierer</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Using network analysis to explore co-occurrence patterns in soil microbial communities</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>343</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>351</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2011.119</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21900968</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Broderick</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1980</year>). <article-title>Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media</article-title>. <source>J. Dairy Sci.</source> <volume>63</volume>, <fpage>64</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>75</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)82888-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7372898</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Calsamiglia</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cardozo</surname> <given-names>P. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferret</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bach</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Changes in rumen microbial fermentation are due to a combined effect of type of diet and pH</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci.</source> <volume>86</volume>, <fpage>702</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>711</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2527/jas.2007-0146</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18073289</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chamruspollert</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pesti</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bakalli</surname> <given-names>R. I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Dietary interrelationships among arginine, methionine, and lysine in young broiler chicks</article-title>. <source>Br. J. Nutr.</source> <volume>88</volume>, <fpage>655</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>660</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1079/BJN2002732</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12493087</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>i884</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>i890</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30423086</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Choi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eom</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jo</surname> <given-names>S. U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of seaweed extracts on in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics, methane production, and microbial abundance</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>24092</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-021-03356-y</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34916562</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Clemente</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ursell</surname> <given-names>L. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Parfrey</surname> <given-names>L. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knight</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>The impact of the gut microbiota on human health: an integrative view</article-title>. <source>Cells</source> <volume>148</volume>, <fpage>1258</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1270</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.035</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22424233</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cox</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yamanishi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sohn</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alekseyenko</surname> <given-names>A. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leung</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cho</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Altering the intestinal microbiota during a critical developmental window has lasting metabolic consequences</article-title>. <source>Cells</source> <volume>158</volume>, <fpage>705</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>721</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.052</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25126780</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Edgar</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads</article-title>. <source>Nat. Methods</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>996</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>998</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.2604</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23955772</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wanapat</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Altitude influences microbial diversity and herbage fermentation in the rumen of yaks</article-title>. <source>BMC Microbiol.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>370</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>313</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12866-020-02054-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33276718</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Faust</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sathirapongsasuti</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Izard</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Segata</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gevers</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raes</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Microbial co-occurrence relationships in the human microbiome</article-title>. <source>PLoS Comput. Biol.</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>e1002606</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002606</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22807668</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Flinth</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Polysaccharide utilization by gut bacteria:poteneial for new insights from genomic analysis</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>121</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>131</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrmicro1817</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> <source>Effects of spartina alterniflora extract on performances, rumen fermentation and serum biochemical parameters of lactating dairy cows</source>. (<year>2020</year>). <publisher-name>Yangzhou university</publisher-name> <publisher-loc>Yangzhou</publisher-loc>, MA thesis.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grubje&#x0161;i&#x0107;</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Titze</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Krieg</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rodehutscord</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Ruminal fermentation characteristics and related feeding values of compound feeds and their constituting single feeds studied by using in vitro techniques</article-title>. <source>Animal</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>1829</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1840</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S1751731120000889</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32381127</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hamana</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Itoh</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sakamoto</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hayashi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Covalently linked polyamines in the cell wall peptidoglycan of the anaerobes belonging to the order selenomonadales</article-title>. <source>J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>339</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>347</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2323/jgam.58.339</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22990495</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jayaraman</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>La</surname> <given-names>K. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>La</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Doan</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carpena</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rademacher</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Supplementation of guanidinoacetic acid to pig diets: effects on performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci.</source> <volume>96</volume>, <fpage>2332</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2341</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jas/sky137</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29873760</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ju</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>R. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Effects of cellulase and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum on the fermentation quality, microbial diversity, gene function prediction, and in vitro rumen fermentation parameters of <italic>Caragana korshinskii</italic> silage</article-title>. <source>Front. Food Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>2</volume>:<fpage>48</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/frfst.2022.1108043</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khalil</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saenbungkhor</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kesnava</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sivapirunthep</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sitthigripong</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jumanee</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of guanidinoacetic acid supplementation on productive performance, pectoral myopathies, and meat quality of broiler chickens</article-title>. <source>Animals</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>3180</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ani11113180</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34827912</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sung</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ko</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Analysis of human and animal fecal microbiota for microbial source tracking</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>362</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>365</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2010.120</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><citation citation-type="confproc"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lemme</surname> <given-names>A</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ringel</surname> <given-names>J</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rostango</surname> <given-names>HS</given-names></name> <name><surname>Redshaw</surname> <given-names>MS</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Supplemental guanidino acetic acid improved feed conversion, weight gain, and breast meat yield in male and female broilers</article-title>. <conf-name>Proceedings of the 16th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition</conf-name>, <publisher-name>World&#x2019;s Poultry Science Association</publisher-name>; <conf-loc>Strasbourg, France</conf-loc>, (<year>2007</year>); pp. <fpage>335</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>338</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>P. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>X. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Effects of <italic>Bacillus amylolyticus</italic> on rumen dry matter digestibility, fermentation parameters and metabolites of dairy cows</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Anim. Nutr.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>311</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>322</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Z. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huo</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effects of guanidinoacetic acid supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestion, rumen fermentation and blood metabolites in Angus bulls</article-title>. <source>Animal</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>2535</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2542</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S1751731120001603</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32580813</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effect of hay supplementation timing on rumen microbiota in suckling calves</article-title>. <source>Microbiology</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>e00430</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/mbo3.430</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29280327</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Z. Z.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of guanidinoacetic acid and coated folic acid supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestion and hepatic gene expression in Angus bulls</article-title>. <source>Br. J. Nutr.</source> <volume>126</volume>, <fpage>510</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>517</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0007114520004341</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33143765</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>X. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Geng</surname> <given-names>H. X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of dietary guanidineacetic acid on growth performance and nutrient digestion and metabolism of lambs</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Anim. Nutr.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>6910</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6918</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2022.115402</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Effects of isovalerate on rumen fermentation and purine derivatives of urine in simmental steer</article-title>. <source>Acta Vet. Zootech. Sini.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>155</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>160</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huo</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Guanidinoacetic acid and betaine supplementation have positive effects on growth performance, nutrient digestion and rumen fermentation in Angus bulls</article-title>. <source>Anim. Feed Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>276</volume>:<fpage>114923</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.114923</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Rumen microbiome and metabolome of high and low residual feed intake angus heifers</article-title>. <source>Front. Vet. Sci.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>812861</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fvets.2022.812861</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35400092</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huo</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Effects of guanidinoacetic acid supplementation on lactation performance, nutrient digestion and rumen fermentation in Holstein dairy cows</article-title>. <source>J. Sci. Food Agric.</source> <volume>103</volume>, <fpage>1522</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1529</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jsfa.12249</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36184578</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Denitrifying sulfide removal process on high-salinity wastewaters in the presence of Halomonas sp</article-title>. <source>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>100</volume>, <fpage>1421</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1426</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-015-7039-6</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26454867</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>L. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>C. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Z. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>Y. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y. Q.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Effects of dietary energy levels on growth performance, nutrient apparent digestibility and serum biochemical indices of Angus bulls</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Anim. Nutr.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>4464</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4473</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.16431/j.cnki.1671-7236.2023.03.012</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>LQ</given-names></name></person-group>. <source>Effects of 2-hydroxy-4-methionine isopropyl on ruminal fermentation and microflora of peripartum dairy cows</source>. (<year>2021</year>). <publisher-name>Ningxia University</publisher-name> <publisher-loc>Ningxia</publisher-loc>, MA thesis.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>L. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F. L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Effects of 2-hydroxy-4-methionine isopropyl on ruminal fermentation and microflora of peripartum dairy cows</article-title>. <source>J. Dairy Sci.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>4425</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4437</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2014-8904</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Diao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Resveratrol affects in vitro rumen fermentation, methane production and prokaryotic community composition in a time-and diet-specific manner</article-title>. <source>Microb. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>1118</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1131</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1751-7915.13566</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32297431</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mago&#x010D;</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salzberg</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>2957</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2963</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21903629</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Makkar</surname> <given-names>H. P. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>O. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dawra</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Negi</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1982</year>). <article-title>Simple determination of microbial protein in rumen liquor</article-title>. <source>J. Dairy Sci.</source> <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>2170</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2173</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(82)82477-6</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7153399</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Menke</surname> <given-names>K. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raab</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salewski</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1979</year>). <article-title>The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>93</volume>, <fpage>217</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>222</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0021859600086305</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Michiels</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maertens</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buyse</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lemme</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rademacher</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dierick</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Supplementation of guanidinoacetic acid to broiler diets: effects on performance, carcass characteristics, meat quality, and energy metabolism</article-title>. <source>Poult. Sci.</source> <volume>91</volume>, <fpage>402</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>412</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps.2011-01585</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22252354</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mizrahi</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jami</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Review: the compositional variation of the rumen microbiome and its effect on host performance and methane emission</article-title>. <source>Animal</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>s220</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>s232</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S1751731118001957</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30139398</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll2">MOA Ministry of Agriculture (PRC)</collab></person-group>. Bulletin of the ministry of agriculture of the People&#x2019;s Republic of China. (<year>2014</year>). Available at:<ext-link xlink:href="http://jiuban.moa.gov.cn/zwllm/tzgg/gg/201411/t20141115_4209901.htm" ext-link-type="uri">http://jiuban.moa.gov.cn/zwllm/tzgg/gg/201411/t20141115_4209901.htm</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>&#x00D8;rskov</surname> <given-names>E. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mcdonald</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1979</year>). <article-title>The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>92</volume>, <fpage>499</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>503</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0021859600063048</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ostojic</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Tackling guanidinoacetic acid for advanced cellular bioenergetics</article-title>. <source>Nutrition</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>55</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>57</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nut.2016.09.010</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28063512</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Poaa</surname> <given-names>E. F. S. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Safety and efficacy of guanidinoacetic acid for chickens for fattening, breeder hens and roosters, and pigs</article-title>. <source>EFSA J.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>4394</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4433</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4394</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Poudel</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Froehlich</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Casper</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Feeding essential oils to neonatal Holstein dairy calves results in increased ruminal Pevotellaceae abundance and propionate concentrations</article-title>. <source>Microorganisms</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>120</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms7050120</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31052458</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ramayo-Caldas</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mach</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lepage</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Levenez</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Denis</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lemonnier</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Phylogenetic network analysis applied to pig gut microbiota identifies an ecosystem structure linked with growth traits</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>2973</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2977</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2016.77</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27177190</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>G. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>G. Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Effects of guanidinoacetic acid and betaine supplementation on growth performance, rumen fermentation and blood metabolites in lambs</article-title>. <source>Sci. Agric. Sin.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>766</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>778</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2023.04.014</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Research progress on the effects of heterotopic acids on rumen metabolism in ruminants</article-title>. <source>Feed Res.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>10</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rey</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Enjalbert</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Combes</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cauquil</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bouchez</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Monteils</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Establishment of ruminal bacterial community in dairy calves from birth to weaning is sequential</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>116</volume>, <fpage>245</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>257</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jam.12405</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24279326</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sari</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zain</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jamarun</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ningrat</surname> <given-names>R. W. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elihasridas</surname> <given-names>P. E. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Improving rumen fermentation characteristics and nutrient digestibility by increasing rumen degradable protein in ruminant feed using Tithonia diversifolia and <italic>Leucaena leucocephala</italic></article-title>. <source>Int. J. Vet. Sci.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>353</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>360</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.47278/journal.ijvs/2021.121</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Satter</surname> <given-names>L. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Slyter</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1974</year>). <article-title>Effect of ammonia concentration on rumen microbial protein production in vitro</article-title>. <source>Br. J. Nutr.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>199</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>208</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1079/BJN19740073</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schloss</surname> <given-names>P. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Westcott</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ryabin</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hall</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hartmann</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hollister</surname> <given-names>E. B.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>75</volume>, <fpage>7537</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7541</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.01541-09</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19801464</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Segata</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Izard</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Waldron</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gevers</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miropolsky</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garrett</surname> <given-names>W. S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation</article-title>. <source>Genome Biol.</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>R60</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21702898</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shabat</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sasson</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Doron-Faigenboim</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Durman</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yaacoby</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berg</surname> <given-names>M. M. E.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Specific microbiome-dependent mechanisms underlie the energy harvest efficiency of ruminants</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>2958</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2972</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2016.62</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27152936</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Stackebrandt</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goebel</surname> <given-names>B. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>846</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>849</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/00207713-44-4-846</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Van Soest</surname> <given-names>P. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robertson</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lewis</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition</article-title>. <source>J. Dairy Sci.</source> <volume>74</volume>, <fpage>3583</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3597</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1660498</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vasta</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Daghio</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cappucci</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buccioni</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Serra</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Viti</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Invited review: Plant polyphenols and rumen microbiota responsible for fatty acid biohydrogenation, fiber digestion, and methane emission: Experimental evidence and methodological approaches</article-title>. <source>J. Dairy Sci.</source> <volume>102</volume>, <fpage>3781</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3804</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.2018-14985</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30904293</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wales</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kolver</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thorne</surname> <given-names>P. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Egan</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Diurnal variation in ruminal pH on the digestibility of highly digestible perennial ryegrass during continuous culture fermentation</article-title>. <source>J. Dairy Sci.</source> <volume>87</volume>, <fpage>1864</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1871</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73344-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15453503</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref61"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>XF</given-names></name></person-group>. <source>Colonization and growth-promoting mechanism of phosphate solubilizing bacteria YL6 in Chinese cabbage</source>. (<year>2019</year>). <publisher-name>Northwest A&#x0026;F University</publisher-name> <publisher-loc>Xianyang</publisher-loc>. MA thesis.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garrity</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tiedje</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cole</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>73</volume>, <fpage>5261</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5267</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.00062-07</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17586664</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref63"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>H. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>X. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>Y. X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Effects of different intercropping patterns on rhizosphere soil bacteria colony characteristics and flue-cured tobacco yield and quality</article-title>. <source>J. South. Agri.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>601</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>608</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref64"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wilk</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kr&#x00F3;l</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>S&#x0142;upczy&#x0144;ska</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sowi&#x0144;ski</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Antoszkiewicz</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pecka-Kie&#x0142;b</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>In vitro rumen methanogenesis and fermentation profile of sorghum whole crop cereal and bagasse ensilaged with inoculum <italic>Lactobacillus buchneri</italic></article-title>. <source>Pak. Vet. J.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>41</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>46</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.29261/pakvetj/2021.056</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref65"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Cysteamine supplementation in vitro remarkably promoted rumen fermentation efficiency towards propionate production via prevotella enrichment and enhancing antioxidant capacity</article-title>. <source>Antioxidants</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>2233</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/antiox11112233</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36421419</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref66"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>D. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>S. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>Z. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Odongo</surname> <given-names>E. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Oleic and linoleic acids alter fermentation characteristics, methane and fatty acid isomers production during in vitro incubation with mixed ruminal microbes</article-title>. <source>J. Food Agri. Environ.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>464</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>469</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref67"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Long</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Z. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of selenium source and microecological agent on nutrient digestibility, rumen fermentation and rumen microflora of beef cattle</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Anim. Nutr.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>6864</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6875</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref68"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tsedan</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Shrub coverage alters the rumen bacterial community of yaks (<italic>Bos grunniens</italic>) grazing in alpine meadows</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>504</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>520</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5187/jast.2020.62.4.504</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32803183</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref69"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yejun</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Su Kyoung</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shin Ja</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jong-Su</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sung</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effects of <italic>Lonicera japonica</italic> extract supplementation on in vitro ruminal fermentation, methane emission, and microbial population</article-title>. <source>Anim. Sci. J.</source> <volume>90</volume>, <fpage>1170</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1176</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/asj.13259</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31321858</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref70"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zain</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Despal</surname> <given-names>T. U. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pazla</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Putri</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Amanah</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of legumes, roughages, and concentrates based on chemical composition, rumen degradable and undegradable proteins by in vitro method. International</article-title>. <source>J. Vet. Sci.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>528</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>538</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.47278/journal.ijvs/2022.218</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref71"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Si</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Action mechanisms of effectors in plant-pathogen interaction</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</source> <volume>23</volume>:<fpage>6758</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms23126758</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35743201</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref72"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Erdene</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Relationships between rumen microbes, short-chain fatty acids, and markers of white adipose tissue browning during the cold season in grazing Mongolian sheep (<italic>Ovis aries</italic>)</article-title>. <source>J. Therm. Biol.</source> <volume>110</volume>:<fpage>103386</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jtherbio.2022.103386</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36462848</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref73"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>M. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Effects of lsoacids on ruminal metabolism and performance in rumiants: a review</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Anim. Nutr.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>1408</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1415</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref74"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xing</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of guanidinoacetic acid and complex antioxidant supplementation on growth performance, meat quality, and antioxidant function of broiler chickens</article-title>. <source>J. Sci. Food Agric.</source> <volume>101</volume>, <fpage>3961</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3968</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jsfa.11036</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33349952</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref75"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Dietary guanidinoacetic acid supplementation improved carcass characteristics, meat quality and muscle fibre traits in growing-finishing gilts</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr.</source> <volume>104</volume>, <fpage>1454</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1461</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jpn.13410</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32618065</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>