<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Microbiol.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Microbiology</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Microbiol.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-302X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1296755</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Microbiology</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Screening and characterization of biocontrol bacteria isolated from <italic>Ageratum conyzoides</italic> against <italic>Collectotrichum fructicola</italic> causing Chinese plum (<italic>Prunus salicina</italic> Lindl.) anthracnose</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Xiaolin</given-names>
</name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2507021/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Miaomiao</given-names>
</name>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname>
<given-names>Lihua</given-names>
</name>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>Suiping</given-names>
</name>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>Tangxun</given-names>
</name>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Qili</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">
<sup>&#x002A;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2429197/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff><institution>Key Laboratory of Green Prevention and Control on Fruits and Vegetables in South China Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Biology for Crop Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Nanning</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0001"><p>Edited by: Ren&#x00E1;t&#x00F3; Kov&#x00E1;cs, University of Debrecen, Hungary</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by" id="fn0002"><p>Reviewed by: Evans N. Nyaboga, University of Nairobi, Kenya; Mohamed Mannaa, Cairo University, Egypt</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Qili Li, <email>65615384@qq.com</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>07</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1296755</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>19</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>16</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2023 Chen, Zhang, Tang, Huang, Guo and Li.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Chen, Zhang, Tang, Huang, Guo and Li</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Chinese plum (<italic>Prunus salicina</italic> Lindl.) is a nutritionally and economically important stone fruit widely grown around the world. Anthracnose, caused by <italic>Collectotrichum</italic> spp., is one of the primary biotic stress factors limiting plum production. Medicinal plants may harbor rhizospheric or endophytic microorganisms that produce bioactive metabolites that can be used as anthracnose biocontrol agents. Here, 27 bacterial isolates from the medicinal plant <italic>A. conyzoides</italic> with diverse antagonistic activities against <italic>C. fructicola</italic> were screened. Based on morphological, physiological, biochemical, and molecular characterization, 25 of these isolates belong to different species of genus <italic>Bacillus</italic>, one to <italic>Pseudomonas monsensis</italic>, and one more to <italic>Microbacterium phyllosphaerae</italic>. Eight representative strains showed high biocontrol efficacy against plum anthracnose in a pot experiment. In addition, several <italic>Bacillus</italic> isolates showed a broad spectrum of inhibitory activity against a variety of fungal phytopathogens. Analysis of the volatile organic compound profile of these eight representative strains revealed a total of 47 compounds, most of which were ketones, while the others included alkanes, alkenes, alcohols, pyrazines, and phenols. Overall, this study confirmed the potential value of eight bacterial isolates for development as anthracnose biocontrol agents.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>
<italic>Bacillus</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>biocontrol</kwd>
<kwd>antagonistic activity</kwd>
<kwd>plum</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Colletotrichum</italic></kwd>
<kwd>volatile</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="7"/>
<table-count count="1"/>
<equation-count count="5"/>
<ref-count count="73"/>
<page-count count="16"/>
<word-count count="10247"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="sec1">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The Chinese plum is one of the most important and delicious fruit crops in the world, grown widely in China, the United States, Japan, and Europe (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref62">Wu et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref59">Wei et al., 2021</xref>). Plum fruits possess high nutritional and economic values, as they are rich in carbohydrates, malic acid, phenolic compounds, anthocyanins, vitamin C, &#x03B2;-carotene, and minerals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref45">Roussos, 2016</xref>). Although native to China, the Chinese plum (<italic>Prunus salicina</italic> Lindl.) is also called Japanese plum because the species was first imported into the United States from Japan (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Fanning et al., 2014</xref>). China is the largest plum producer, with an annual production of 6,615,469 tons in 2021, which accounted for 55.1% of the global total production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>The production of Chinese plums can be negatively affected by various factors, including a range of diseases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Long et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Huang et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Shu et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Lu et al., 2022a</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">b</xref>). Indeed, the Chinese plum is vulnerable to a variety of diseases, one of the most destructive of which is plum anthracnose, caused by the fungus <italic>Colletotrichum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Huang et al., 2022</xref>). To date, <italic>C. fructicola</italic>, <italic>C. gloeosporioides</italic>, <italic>C. cigarro</italic>, <italic>C. siamense</italic>, and <italic>C</italic>. <italic>aeschynomenes</italic> have been reported as the causative agents of plum anthracnose in China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Huang et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Lu et al., 2022a</xref>). The pathogen mainly infects the leaves of the plum tree, generally manifesting as yellowish spots or lesions, followed by withering at later stages of the disease. In turn, the resulting reduction in total tree leaf-area limits photosynthesis, nutrient absorption, and growth, ultimately leading to reduced fruit quality and severe yield losses. In addition, plum fruits with visible anthracnose, characterized by sunken, round, and brown necrotic lesions, also experience reduced fruit production at harvest, resulting in considerable economic loss (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Hassan et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>Most <italic>Colletotrichum</italic> species are plurivorous anthracnose pathogens that infect a wide range of host plants, including many other fruit-tree species besides <italic>Prunus salicina</italic> Lindl (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Cannon et al., 2012</xref>). To date, anthracnose prevention still relies primarily on chemical control (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Wang Q. H. et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Wang Z. et al., 2020</xref>). Conventional fungicides, such as difenoconazole, prochloraz, tebuconazole, benomyl, and pyraclostrobin are the most common commercial products used to control anthracnose disease in Chinese plum orchards (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Dowling et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Wang Q. H. et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Wang Z. et al., 2020</xref>). However, the continuous use of agricultural chemicals directly or indirectly pollutes the air, water, soil, and the overall ecosystem, posing serious health hazards for all living organisms. Therefore, biological control based on the use of microorganisms with antagonistic activities provides a safe and sustainable alternative for controlling phytopathogenic fungi.</p>
<p>Plant-beneficial bacteria that protect plants from disease by living as rhizospheric or endophytic microorganisms, such as <italic>Bacillus</italic>, <italic>Streptomyces</italic>, <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, and <italic>Burkholderia</italic> have been well documented (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref46">Ryu et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Boukaew et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Guevara-Avenda&#x00F1;o et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Jin et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Soo et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Choub et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Mehmood et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">Rodr&#x00ED;guez-Cisneros et al., 2023</xref>). Some of the bacteria in the genera <italic>Bacillus</italic> and <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> have been demonstrated to have the ability to control anthracnose (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Jin et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">Soo et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Choub et al., 2022</xref>). Among such antagonistic bacteria, <italic>Bacillus</italic> species are prominent and used as biocontrol agents due to their ubiquitous nature, broad adaptability, and endospore-forming characteristics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Radhakrishnan et al., 2017</xref>). Plant-associated antagonistic bacteria have different biocontrol mechanisms against phytopathogens, including competition for resources, production of antimicrobial metabolites, such as antibiotics and lipopeptides, and emission of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), such as ketones and sulfur compounds that can induce plant defense responses and/or antagonize fungal pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Grahovac et al., 2023</xref>). For instance, <italic>B. subtilis</italic> controls <italic>C</italic>. <italic>gloeosporioides</italic> by producing antifungal lipopeptides, including iturin A, fengycin, surfactin A, and/or bacillomycin D (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Jin et al., 2019</xref>). In turn, some rhizobacteria, such as <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> and <italic>Bacillus</italic>, emit VOCs with antifungal activity against <italic>C</italic>. <italic>gloeosporioides</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Guevara-Avenda&#x00F1;o et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Choub et al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>Medicinal plants may harbor rhizospheric or endophytic microorganisms that produce bioactive metabolites and may thus be used as biocontrol candidates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">K&#x00F6;berl et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Aydi Ben Abdallah et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Huang et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref61">Wicaksono et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Momin and Ibrahim, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref72">Zhou A. et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref73">Zhou J. et al., 2022</xref>). Further, a significant number of bioactive compounds from medicinal plants are now actually known to be produced by associated microbes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">K&#x00F6;berl et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Huang et al., 2018</xref>). A case in point, <italic>Ageratum conyzoides</italic> (Asteraceae) is an annual aromatic herb with great therapeutic importance in many countries worldwide, especially in tropical and subtropical regions. This medicinal plant possesses antifungal potential owning to the secondary metabolites it accumulates against different fungal pathogens, such as <italic>Aspergillus</italic>, <italic>Alternaria</italic>, <italic>Candida</italic>, <italic>Fusarium</italic>, <italic>Phytophthora</italic>, and <italic>Pythium</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Chahal et al., 2021</xref>). Additionally, it was previously revealed that endophytic bacteria isolated from <italic>A. conyzoides</italic> exhibited the potential for plant-growth-promoting activities <italic>in vitro</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Momin and Ibrahim, 2020</xref>). However, little is known regarding the antimicrobial activity of bacteria isolated from <italic>A. conyzoides</italic>. Therefore, this study aimed to isolate and characterize bacteria from <italic>A. conyzoides</italic>, evaluate their antagonistic activity against plum anthracnose, and confirm their antagonistic activity against a wide range of fungal phytopathogens. In addition, the composition and content of VOCs produced by representative bacterial isolates that showed high antifungal activity in the two-sealed-plate assay were also investigated. Overall, our study confirmed the potential value of eight bacterial isolates obtained from <italic>A. conyzoides</italic> as biocontrol agents.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="sec2">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="sec3">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Sampling and microbial strain isolation</title>
<p><italic>Ageratum conyzoides</italic> samples were collected from Nanning, Hechi, and Yulin cities in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, southern China. Flowers, leaves, stems, and roots were selected for the isolation of microbial strains. The <italic>A. conyzoides</italic> sampled organs were cut into small fragments (1&#x2009;cm in size), sterilized with 75% ethanol for 10&#x2009;s followed by 2% sodium hypochlorite for 1&#x2009;min, rinsed three times in sterile water, and homogenized. The samples were allowed to stand for 10&#x2009;min; then, 100&#x2009;&#x03BC;L supernatant was diluted to 10<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, 10<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>, and 10<sup>&#x2212;3</sup> with sterilized water, and 100&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of each diluent was spread on LB plates (<xref rid="SM2" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S1</xref>). After 2 d of incubation at 30&#x00B0;C, different morphotypes were picked up and re-streaked onto LB plates for further purifying a single, pure colony. Subsequently, purified colonies were cultured on LB medium agar (<xref rid="SM2" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S1</xref>) slants at 4&#x00B0;C and in 25% (v/v) sterile glycerol stock at &#x2212;80&#x00B0;C for further experiments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<label>2.2</label>
<title><italic>In vitro</italic> antifungal assay for preliminary screening of antagonistic bacteria</title>
<p><italic>Colletotrichum fructicola</italic> is the dominant pathogenic species responsible for plum anthracnose (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Huang et al., 2022</xref>). This species was selected as the preliminary control target- indicator. All bacterial isolates were screened for antagonistic ability using plate confrontation assay (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Hong et al., 2022</xref>). Generally, the isolated strains were inoculated in LB liquid medium, and cultured on a shaker at 30&#x00B0;C. After cultured for 24&#x2009;h at 200&#x2009;rpm, bacterial concentration was adjusted to an OD<sub>600</sub> value of 1.0. In the plate confrontation assay, the bacterial suspension was streaked using an inoculation loop on the left side of the PDA plate 2&#x2009;cm away from the edge. A mycelial plug (5&#x2009;mm in diameter) of each phytopathogenic fungus from the 5-day culture was obtained using a sterile cork borer and placed on a PDA plate at a distance of 5&#x2009;cm from the center of the inoculated strain line. Plates inoculated with only the phytopathogenic fungal plug served as the control group and were incubated at 28&#x00B0;C for 5&#x2009;days. Treatments were performed in triplicate. The inhibition rate was calculated using the following formula:</p>
<p><italic>I</italic> (%)&#x2009;=&#x2009;(<italic>r<sub>0</sub></italic>&#x2013;<italic>r<sub>1</sub></italic>)/<italic>r<sub>0</sub></italic>&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;100</p>
<p>Where <italic>I</italic> is the inhibition rate, <italic>r<sub>0</sub></italic> is the radius of the mycelia in the control group, <italic>r<sub>1</sub></italic> is the radius of the mycelia in the dual-culture plate.</p>
<p>Bacterial VOC antifungal activity assays were performed using the two-sealed-plate method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Cortazar-Murillo et al., 2023</xref>). Briefly, a 200-&#x03BC;L aliquot of the overnight culture of each bacterial isolate (OD<sub>600</sub>&#x2009;=&#x2009;1.0) was spread separately on a plate containing LB medium. The lids were removed and replaced with another PDA plate containing a plug of 5&#x2009;mm diameter of fungal mycelia on the PDA. Both plates were immediately sealed with a double layer of parafilm to prevent volatile leakage and then incubated at 28&#x00B0;C for 5&#x2009;days. Each bacterial isolate was tested for antifungal activity in triplicate. Three assays were set up without bacterial treatment (LB only) and used as controls. Antifungal activity was measured as the percentage of reduction in mycelial growth. The inhibition rates were calculated using the following formula:</p>
<disp-formula id="E1"><mml:math id="M1"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>Where <italic>I</italic> is the inhibition rate, <italic>d</italic>0 is the diameter of mycelial growth in the control, and <italic>d</italic>1 is the diameter of mycelial growth after exposure to bacterial VOCs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Microscopic observation of the effect of antagonistic bacteria on <italic>Colletotrichum fructicola</italic></title>
<p>To investigate whether the morphology of <italic>C. fructicola</italic> causing plum anthracnose was altered by the antagonistic bacteria, the mycelia of <italic>C. fructicola</italic> colonies in a 5-day dual culture or in the control medium were observed under a Nikon Ni-E microscope.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec6">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Pot experiment to evaluate prevention potential</title>
<p>Potted seedlings of pearl plum, which was developed from the local wild resources of Tian&#x2019;e County in Guangxi, was used in this experiment. The 2-year-old pearl plum seedlings were transplanted into pots and maintained under uniform field conditions. After growing new leaves, plants in a healthy growth state were selected and prepared for the assays. To prepare bacterial suspensions, each isolate was first grown in LB liquid medium at 30&#x00B0;C in a shaker with 180&#x2009;rpm for 24&#x2009;h. All cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5,000&#x2009;rpm for 5&#x2009;min and the supernatants were discarded. The pellets were washed, resuspended in 0.05% tween-20 solution, and adjusted to a population density of 1.0&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;10<sup>7</sup> colony-forming units (CFU)/mL. To obtain the fungal inoculum, after growing on a PDA plate for 5&#x2009;days, a 5-mm diameter mycelia plug of <italic>C</italic>. <italic>fructicola</italic> was inoculated in PDB liquid medium with a shaking speed of 180&#x2009;rpm at 28&#x00B0;C in a shaker incubator for 3&#x2013;4&#x2009;days. The conidia were collected by filtration and centrifugation, and adjusted to a density of 1.0&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;10<sup>6</sup> conidia/mL. First, the bacterial suspension was sprayed onto the leaves of the pearl plum seedlings and the control was sprayed with a suspension containing 0.05% tween-20. After the pear plum seedlings were kept in a greenhouse with relative humidity between 75 and 90% for 24&#x2009;h, 10&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of conidia suspension was inoculated on each leaf where a round filter paper sheet (0.5&#x2009;cm in diameter) was placed for moisture. Tree seedlings were inoculated with each strain.</p>
<p>After 5&#x2009;days, the leaves of the pearl plum trees were examined for symptoms of <italic>C. fructicola</italic> infection and disease severity based on the diameter of necrosis, and disease prevention efficacy was calculated according to the following formula:</p>
<disp-formula id="E2"><mml:math id="M2"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pe</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="thickmathspace"/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>where Pe is prevention efficacy, <italic>d</italic>0 is the diameter of necrotic lesions when the leaves were inoculated with conidia but without bacterial suspension, and <italic>d</italic>1 is the diameter of necrotic lesions that developed when leaves were inoculated with conidia added with bacterial suspension.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Molecular identification</title>
<p>The antagonistic bacteria were grown in an LB liquid medium at 37&#x00B0;C in a shaker incubator at 180&#x2009;rpm for 24&#x2009;h. Genomic DNA was extracted using a TIANamp Bacteria DNA Kit (Tiangen Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China).16S rDNA, <italic>gyrA</italic>, <italic>gyrB</italic>, and <italic>rpoB</italic> gene fragments of the isolates were amplified using the primers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Roberts et al., 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref66">Yamamoto and Harayama, 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">De Clerck et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref57">Wang et al., 2013</xref>) listed in <xref rid="SM2" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S2</xref>. The PCR amplification system consisted of 50&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of 5&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;PCR buffer 10&#x2009;&#x03BC;L, 4&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of dNTPs (2.5&#x2009;mM), 1.5&#x2009;&#x03BC;L of each primer (10&#x2009;&#x03BC;M), 0.5&#x2009;&#x03BC;L DNA polymerase, 1&#x2009;&#x03BC;L DNA template and adequate ddH<sub>2</sub>O to the final volume of 50&#x2009;&#x03BC;L. The PCR cycle conditions are listed in <xref rid="SM2" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S2</xref>, and the PCR products were detected by 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis. Amplified products were sequenced by Sangon Biotech Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The resulting sequence analysis was performed via BLASTN alignment on NCBI, and the sequences were submitted to GenBank to obtain gene accession numbers. 16S rDNA gene sequences, <italic>gyrA</italic>, <italic>gyrB</italic>, and <italic>rpoB</italic> with high similarity were used to concatenate and construct phylogenetic trees using the maximum likelihood method with bootstrap analysis of 1,000 replicates in the MEGA X software.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Morphological, physiological, and biochemical characterization of antagonistic bacteria</title>
<p>Antagonistic bacterial strains were characterized according to morphological characteristics, such as colony margin, shape, and color, as well as physiological and biochemical characteristics, including Gram reaction, salt tolerance, contact enzyme, V-P test, methyl red (MR) test, citrate utilization, gelatin liquefaction, amylolysis, starch hydrolysis, and carbon source utilization, based on the methods of Berger&#x2019;s Manual of Bacterial Identification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Holt et al., 1994</xref>) and the Common Bacterial Systems Identification Manual (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Dong and Cai, 2001</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>Evaluation of the antagonistic spectrum of the antagonistic bacteria</title>
<p>The antagonistic spectra of the bacterial isolates against 14 fungal phytopathogens, namely, <italic>Botryosphaeria dothidea</italic>, <italic>Neoscytalidium dimidiatum</italic>, <italic>Pseudofusicoccum violaceum</italic>, <italic>Rhizoctonia solani</italic>, <italic>Exserohilum</italic> sp., <italic>Peronophythora litchi</italic>, <italic>Fusarium sulawesiense</italic>, <italic>Phanerochaete sordida</italic>, <italic>Alternaria brassicae</italic>, <italic>Epicoccum sorghinum</italic>, <italic>Diaporthe phoenicicola</italic>, <italic>D. phaseolorum</italic>, <italic>C. fructicola</italic>, and <italic>Magnaporthe oryzae</italic> were determined by the plate confrontation assay as described above. The phytopathogens were collected and stored in a low-temperature refrigerator at our laboratory.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<label>2.8</label>
<title>Effects of different mediums on the antagonistic activity of VOCs</title>
<p>The LB, NA, PSA, and PDA culture media were tested to determine the impact of their composition on the production of VOCs and their involvement in antifungal activity. After growing in PDB, LB, NB, and PSB liquid medium at 30&#x00B0;C in a shaker with 180&#x2009;rpm for 24&#x2009;h, 200-&#x03BC;L aliquots of the overnight culture of the isolated bacterial strains were spread on the PDA, LB, NA, and PSA plates, respectively. The two-sealed-plate assay method described above was used for the preliminary assay, and the antagonistic activities of VOCs were compared. The strain with the highest inhibition rate was dual-cultured with <italic>C. fructicola</italic> in two-sealed plates for 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120&#x2009;h to determine the optimum time for identification.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<label>2.9</label>
<title>VOCs identification of bacterial isolates by headspace solid phase microextraction/GC&#x2013;MS (HS-SPME/GC&#x2013;MS)</title>
<p>The VOCs emitted by the bacterial isoaltes were identified using headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (HS-SPME/GC&#x2013;MS). The following treatment was used to prepare VOCs: each of the eight representative bacterial isolates was grown in LB liquid medium at 30&#x00B0;C in a shaker with 180&#x2009;rpm for 24&#x2009;h, then a 200-&#x03BC;L aliquot of the culture was transferred to a headspace vial with 100-mL volume containing 20&#x2009;mL LB solid medium, and was air-dried on a clean bench. Then, the headspace vial was sealed with a silicone rubber spacer, and placed in a constant temperature incubator at 30&#x00B0;C for 3&#x2009;days. A headspace vial containing the uninoculated medium was used as a control to remove naturally occurring volatile compounds from each treatment. Subsequently, the headspace vial was placed in a water bath adjusted to 60&#x00B0;C. After equilibration for 5&#x2009;min, bacterial VOCs were collected with SPME fibers (50/30&#x2009;&#x03BC;m DVB/CAR/PDMS, Supelco, Inc., Bellefonte, PA), which were inserted into the upper side of the headspace vial for 50&#x2009;min. Then SPME fibers were injected into the GC port of a gas chromatograph coupled to a mass spectrometer (GC/MS, 7890A-5975CMSD, USA). VOCs were desorbed at 280&#x00B0;C for 5&#x2009;min in the GC injector port interfaced with a mass detector. Helium gas was used as carrier gas (1.0&#x2009;mL&#x2009;min<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, constant flow) and a DB-5 MS capillary column (30&#x2009;m length &#x00D7; 0.25&#x2009;mm inner diameter&#x2009;&#x00D7;&#x2009;0.25&#x2009;&#x03BC;m film thickness) from Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used as a stationary phase. Operational conditions were the following: initial oven temperature of 40&#x00B0;C for 5&#x2009;min, increased to 120&#x00B0;C (4&#x00B0;C per min) for 3&#x2009;min, and further increased to 280&#x00B0;C (30&#x00B0;C per min) for a run time of 10&#x2009;min. The mass spectrometer was operated in the electron ionization mode at 70&#x2009;eV with a source temperature of 250&#x00B0;C, and with a continuous scan from 35 to 450&#x2009;m/z. Data processing was performed using MassHunter software (Agilent Technologies). VOCs were initially identified by comparing MS peaks with those in the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 2017 MS Library.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<label>2.10</label>
<title>Biocontrol efficacy evaluation under greenhouse conditions</title>
<p>Plum and inoculum preparations were implemented as described in Section 2.4. Two inoculation methods were used in this study. The first method involved spraying the bacterial suspension for 24&#x2009;h, followed by inoculation with conidia of <italic>C. fructicola</italic> (pre-treatment). In the second procedure, the leaves were inoculated with conidia of <italic>C. fructicola</italic> 24&#x2009;h before spraying the bacterial suspension (treatment). Three treatments were used: (1) CK, <italic>C. fructicola</italic> alone, (2) <italic>C. fructicola</italic>&#x2009;+&#x2009;antagonistic bacterial isolates, and (3) antagonistic bacterial isolates&#x2009;+&#x2009;<italic>C. fructicola</italic>. Each treatment consisted of three plants with 15 leaves per plant. All pots were kept under greenhouse conditions at a temperature of 28&#x00B0;C and relative humidity between 75 and 90%, under a photoperiod regime of 16&#x2009;h light /8&#x2009;h dark.</p>
<p>After 5&#x2009;days, the leaves of the pearl plum trees were examined for symptoms of <italic>C. fructicola</italic> infection and disease severity (percentage of infected plant area) based on necrosis symptoms. A severity score on a scale of 0 to 5 was based on the visual scale of necrosis on leaves using the modified method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Choub et al. (2021)</xref>, where 0&#x2009;=&#x2009;no sign of visible necrosis, 1&#x2009;=&#x2009;necrotic area covering less than 5% of the total leaf surface, 2&#x2009;=&#x2009;necrotic lesions covering 6&#x2013;5% of the total leaf surface, 3&#x2009;=&#x2009;necrotic lesions covering 16&#x2013;25% of the total leaf surface, 4&#x2009;=&#x2009;necrotic lesions covering 26&#x2013;50% of the total leaf surface, and 5&#x2009;=&#x2009;necrotic lesions covering more than 50% of the total leaf surface. The incidence rate, disease index, and control efficacy were calculated using the following formulas:</p>
<disp-formula id="E3"><mml:math id="M3"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Incidence rate</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="thickmathspace"/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Numer of disease leaves</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Total number of leaves investigated</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="E4"><mml:math id="M4"><mml:mtable columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Disease index</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="thickmathspace"/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Number of disease leaves</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="thickmathspace"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">at</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="thickmathspace"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">each level</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Corresponding level value</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Total number of leaves investigated</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="E5"><mml:math id="M5"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Control efficacy</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="thickmathspace"/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Disease index in</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="thickmathspace"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CK</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Disease index in treatment</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Disease index in</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="thickmathspace"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CK</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>Software DPS 3.01(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">Tang and Zhang, 2013</xref>) was used for statistical analysis. Statistical significance between data groups was determined at <italic>p</italic>&#x2009;&#x003C;&#x2009;0.05 using analysis of variance (ANOV). Data shown are means&#x2009;&#x00B1;&#x2009;SD (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;3).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="sec13">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="sec14">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Isolation of antagonistic bacteria and evaluation of <italic>in vitro</italic> inhibition of <italic>Colletotrichum fructicola</italic></title>
<p>To screen the microbial resources for controlling pearl plum anthracnose, a total of 249 bacterial strains were isolated from different plant organs (stems, leaves, flowers, and roots) of the <italic>A. conyzoides</italic> collected samples. All isolated bacterial strains were screened for antifungal properties against <italic>C. fructicola</italic> on a dual culture assay. Among them, 27 strains showed varying antagonistic activities; furthermore, particularly, strain AH8 displayed significant antagonism, reaching an inhibition rate of 65.4% in the confrontation plate assay, and strain H16 showed the highest inhibition rate (73.1%) in the two-sealed-plate assay. The inhibition rate of the isolates ranged from 14.1 to 65.4% in the confrontation plate assay and from 13.4 to 73.1% in the two-sealed-plate assay (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figures 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">2</xref> and <xref rid="SM2" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S3</xref>). Of the 27 isolates, 9, 6, and 12 were obtained from the flowers, leaves, and stems, respectively (<xref rid="SM2" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S4</xref>). To determine whether the morphology of <italic>C. fructicola</italic> was changed upon exposure to the antagonistic bacteria, the mycelia at the front line facing the bacterial colony or the medium control were sampled and observed under a microscope. Microscopic observations showed evidence of morphological alterations in fungal mycelia when <italic>C. fructicola</italic> was dual-cultured with the antagonistic bacterial isolate (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>), including severe deformation, swelling, and vacuolation of hyphae exposed to bacterial diffusible compounds (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3D</xref>), or thin, crimped, branching, and shriveling of hyphae exposed to bacterial VOCs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3F</xref>), in contrast to hyphae without dual cultured with the isolate developed normally (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4B</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>The Antagonistic activity of the 27 isolates against <italic>C. fructicola</italic> in the plate confrontation assay. <bold>(A,B)</bold> CK, negative control; 1, AH7; 2, AH8; 3, AJ4; 4, AJ5; 5, AJ8; 6, AJ9; 7, AY12; 8, AY13; 9, H11; 10, J1; 11, XYDH11; 12, JB4; 13, XYAH1; 14, XYAH2; 15, AYAJ8; 16, XYBH7; 17, XYBJ13; 18, XYCH7; 19, XYCJ12; 20, JB1; 21, XYDJ1; 22, XYDJ2; 23, Y4; 24, Y5; 25, Y6; 26, YB1, 27, H16. Error bars represent the standard deviation (<italic>n</italic> =&#x2009;3).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1296755-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>The Antagonistic activity of the 27 isolates against <italic>C. fructicola</italic> in the two-sealed-plate assay. <bold>(A,B)</bold>: CK, negative control; 1, AH7; 2, AH8; 3, AJ4; 4, AJ5; 5, AJ8; 6, AJ9; 7, AY12; 8, AY13; 9, H11; 10, J1; 11, XYDH11; 12, JB4; 13, XYAH1; 14, XYAH2; 15, AYAJ8; 16, XYBH7; 17, XYBJ13; 18, XYCH7; 19, XYCJ12; 20, JB1; 21, XYDJ1; 22, XYDJ2; 23, Y4; 24, Y5; 25, Y6; 26, YB1, 27, H16. Error bars represent the standard deviation (<italic>n</italic> =&#x2009;3).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1296755-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="fig3">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Microscopy images of the morphological alterations in the hyphal structure of <italic>C. fructicola</italic>, causal agent of anthracnose of pearl plum, induced by bacterial isolate AH7. The normal morphology of hyphae in the control groups <bold>(A,B)</bold>, the abnormal hyphae exposed to bacterial diffusible compounds displayed deformation, vacuolation, and swelling <bold>(C,D)</bold>, and hyphae exposed to bacterial VOCs indicated thin, crimped, and shriveling <bold>(E,F)</bold>. Scale bars represent 100&#x2009;&#x03BC;m.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1296755-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig position="float" id="fig4">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of bacteria strains of <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp. based on 16S rDNA-<italic>gyrA</italic>-<italic>rpoB</italic>-<italic>gyrB</italic> gene sequences. Bootstrap support values (1,000 replicates) above 50% are shown at the nodes. The scale bar shows the evolutionary distance between species.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1296755-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Molecular identification of antagonistic bacteria</title>
<p>To clarify the taxonomic status of the 27 bacterial isolates, 16S rDNA of each isolate was amplified by PCR using the 16S universal primer pair 27F and 1492R. Gene fragments were sequenced and analyzed using BLAST at NCBI. The data showed that 25 isolates had high sequence identity (above 99%) with <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp., and were therefore affiliated with that genus, accounting for 92.6% of the total strains. The two other isolates belonged to genera <italic>Microbacterium</italic> and <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>. Furthermore, <italic>gyrA</italic>, <italic>rpoB,</italic> and <italic>gyrB</italic> from the 25 <italic>Bacillus</italic> strains and <italic>gyrB</italic> from the other 2 strains were amplified and sequenced. All sequences were deposited in GenBank and accession numbers were obtained (<xref rid="SM2" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S4</xref>). Phylogenetic tree construction based on the concatenated sequences of 16S rDNA, <italic>gyrA</italic>, <italic>rpoB</italic>, and <italic>gyrB</italic> from the 25 isolates and sequences derived from <italic>Bacillus</italic> type strains revealed that 14, 9, 1, and 1 strains were classified as <italic>B. velezensis</italic>, <italic>B. subtilis</italic>, <italic>B. altitudinis</italic>, and <italic>B. cereus</italic>, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Phylogenetic analysis of two other strains, YB1 and H16 based on the 16S rDNA and <italic>gyrB</italic> sequences and sequences derived from the type strains, identified YB1 and H16 as <italic>Microbacterium phyllosphaerae</italic> and <italic>Pseudomonas monsensis</italic>, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig5">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption>
<p>Phylogenetic tree of bacteria strains H16 and YB1 based on 16S rDNA-<italic>gyrB</italic> gene sequences. Bootstrap support values (1,000 replicates) above 50% are shown at the nodes. The scale bar shows the evolutionary distance between species.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1296755-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Furthermore, a preliminary evaluation of the prevention of <italic>C. fructicola</italic> damage on pot plants by the 27 antagonistic bacterial isolates showed that most of the bacterial isolates were highly effective in preventing the disease. Among the isolates, XYAH1 and H16 showed the highest prevention efficacy, i.e., 98.4 and 92.0%, respectively (<xref rid="SM2" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S5</xref>). Therefore, eight representative isolates, <italic>B. velezensis</italic> XYAH1 and XYCJ12, <italic>B. subtilis</italic> XYAJ8 and AJ4, <italic>B</italic>. <italic>creceus</italic> XYDH11, <italic>B. altitudinis</italic> J1, <italic>P</italic>. <italic>monsensis</italic> H16, and <italic>M. phyllosphaerae</italic> YB1, were selected for further experiments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec16">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Morphological, physiological, and biochemical characteristics of antagonistic bacteria</title>
<p>The eight representative isolates were spread on an LB medium plate, placed at 28&#x00B0;C for 2&#x2013;3 days, and their morphology was observed. Colonies of <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp. were creamy white, opaque, flat, rough, and wrinkled with irregular edges, and there were no obvious differences between them on LB plates (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>). A single colony of <italic>P</italic>. <italic>monsensis</italic> H16 was creamy white, round, convex, and smooth, with entire margins. The <italic>M. phyllosphaerae</italic> YB1 colony was beige-to-yellow, round, convex, and smooth, with entire margins (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S1</xref>). Gram staining of <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp. was positive, while <italic>P</italic>. <italic>monsensis</italic> H16 and <italic>M. phyllosphaerae</italic> YB1 were Gram-negative (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S2</xref>). Physiological and biochemical characterization revealed that <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp. grew on LB plates containing 10% NaCl or lower; Meanwhile, <italic>M. phyllosphaerae</italic> YB1 grew on LB plates containing 7% or less NaCk, and <italic>P</italic>. <italic>monsensis</italic> H16 grew on LB plates containing 5% NaCl or less (<xref rid="SM2" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S6</xref>). There were no apparent differences in the physiological or biochemical characteristics between <italic>B. velezensis</italic> and <italic>B. subtilis</italic>. Both effectively used citrate, sucrose, D-maltose, D-sorbitol, D-xylose, inositol, D-fructose, or D-glucose, but not &#x03B1;-lactose, D-galactose, dulcitol, or L- rhamnose. The contact enzyme, gelatin, starch, cellulose, and V-P reactions were positive, whereas the MR reaction was negative (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S3</xref> and <xref rid="SM2" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S7</xref>). <italic>B. cereus</italic> XYDH11 successfully used citrate, sucrose, D-maltose, D-sorbitol, inositol, D-fructose, or D-glucose, but not &#x03B1;-lactose, D-xylose, D-mannitol, D-galactose, dulcitol or L-rhamnose. Other characteristics are the same as <italic>B. velezensis</italic> and <italic>B. subtilis</italic>. Characteristics of <italic>B. altitudinis</italic> J1 are the same as <italic>B. cereus</italic> XYDH11, except MR and V-P reaction, D-maltose, D-sorbitol, inositol, and D-mannitol utilization. With regard to <italic>P</italic>. <italic>monsensis</italic> H16, this strain used citrate, sucrose, D-maltose, inositol, D-mannitol, D-fructose, and D-glucose, but not &#x03B1;-lactose, D-xylose, D-sorbitol, D-galactose, dulcitol or L-rhamnose; other characteristics are the same as <italic>B. cereus</italic> except MR reaction and starch hodrolysis. As for <italic>M. phyllosphaerae</italic> YB1, except starch hydrolysi, &#x03B1;-lactose, D-xylose, D-fructose, and D-glucose utilization other characteristics are the same as <italic>P</italic>. <italic>monsensis</italic> (<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Figure S3</xref> and <xref rid="SM2" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplemental Table S7</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Biocontrol efficacy of antagonistic bacteria against plum anthracnose</title>
<p>The biocontrol efficacy of eight representatives against anthracnose of pearl plum was determined under greenhouse conditions. The results showed that all representatives tested had high prevention effectiveness in the pre-treatment, in which case, the prevention efficacy of <italic>B. subtilis</italic> XYAJ8 and <italic>B. altitudinis</italic> J1 reached 100%, and the prevention efficacy of all other bacterial strains was no less than 85%. The disease index and incidence rate of anthracnose on pearl plum leaves in the treatments with the eight tested representatives were significantly lower than those in the control group. Especially were the disease index and incidence rate of leaves in the treatment with <italic>B. velezensis</italic> XYAH1. As a result, in the treatment, <italic>B. velezensis</italic> XYAH1 was the best with a control efficacy of 98.8%; conversely, <italic>M. phyllosphaerae</italic> YB1 showed the poorest control efficacy at 42.0%, whereas the others did not significantly differ in efficacy, ranging from 73.3 to 80.2% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> and <xref rid="SM2" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S8</xref>).</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig6">
<label>Figure 6</label>
<caption>
<p>Biocontrol efficacy of the representative bacterial isolates against pearl plum anthracnose under greenhouse conditions. <bold>(A, B)</bold> CK, <italic>C. fructicola</italic> alone; 1, <italic>B. velezensis</italic> XYAH1; 2, <italic>B. velezensis</italic> XYCJ12; 3, <italic>B. subtilis</italic> XYAJ8;4, <italic>B. subtilis</italic> AJ4; 5, <italic>B. receus</italic> XYDH11; 6, <italic>B. altitudinis</italic> J1; 7, <italic>P. monsensis</italic> H16; 8,<italic>M. phyllosphaerae</italic> YB1. Pre: pre-treatment involved spraying bacterial suspension for 24&#x2009;h first, followed by an inoculation with conidia of <italic>C. fructicola</italic>, Tre, treatment involved inoculating leaves with conidia of <italic>C. fructicola</italic> 24&#x2009;h before bacterial suspension was sprayed. The photos were taken 5&#x2009;days post-inoculation.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1296755-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec18">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Inhibitory spectrum of antagonistic bacteria</title>
<p>The selected eight bacterial strains showed diverse inhibitory activities against the 15 fungal phytopathogens tested (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). Among the tested bacterial strains, <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp. exhibited relatively better inhibitory effects, whereas <italic>P</italic>. <italic>monsensis</italic> and <italic>M. phyllosphaerae</italic> showed weaker inhibition levels of all tested phytopathogens in the confrontation assay. These results indicated that the <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp. isolates exhibited broad-spectrum antifungal activity. In addition, except <italic>B. cereus</italic> XYDH11, most of the <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp. isolates displayed a high inhibitory effect on <italic>Magnaporthe oryzae</italic>, with inhibition rates ranging from 88.7 to 95.0%, followed by <italic>Peronophythora litchii</italic>, with inhibition rates ranging from 55.8 to 73.4%. However, <italic>B. cereus</italic> XYDH11, <italic>P</italic>. <italic>monsensis</italic> H16, and <italic>M. phyllosphaerae</italic> YB1, had no antagonistic effects on <italic>Neoscytalidium dimidiatum</italic>, and <italic>M. phyllosphaerae</italic> YB1 had no antagonistic effect on <italic>P</italic>. <italic>litchii</italic>.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig7">
<label>Figure 7</label>
<caption>
<p>Inhibitory effect of the eight bacterial isolates on 15 phytopathogens. <bold>(A&#x2013;H)</bold> 1, <italic>Botryosphaeria dothidea</italic> TEY11A-1; 2, <italic>Neoscytalidium dimidiatum</italic> HF; 3, <italic>Pseudofusicoccum violaceum</italic> EGY16A-1; 4, <italic>Rhizoctonia solani</italic> YMWK; 5, <italic>Exserohilum</italic> sp. YB33-1; 6, <italic>Peronophythora litchii</italic> LZ1-3-2; 7, <italic>Fusarium sulawesiense</italic> TEY15-1; 8, <italic>Phanerochaete sordida</italic> FY27-1; 9, <italic>Alternaria brassicae</italic> YB43-2; 10, <italic>Epicoccum sorghinum</italic> YB53-2; 11, <italic>Diaporthe phoenicicola</italic> BY58-2; 12, <italic>Diaporthe phaseolorum</italic> YB3; 13, <italic>Colletotrichum fructicola</italic> DS1-G-1; 14, <italic>C. fructicola</italic> GZ15-1; 15, <italic>Magnaporthe oryzae</italic> 6&#x2013;6.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fmicb-14-1296755-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec19">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>Characterization of bacterial VOCs using HS-SPME/GC&#x2013;MS</title>
<p>Volatile compounds produced by the eight bacterial strains <italic>B. velezensis</italic> XYAH1 and XYCJ12, <italic>B. subtilis</italic> XYAJ8 and AJ4, <italic>B</italic>. <italic>creceus</italic> XYDH11, <italic>B. altitudinis</italic> J1, <italic>P</italic>. <italic>monsensis</italic> H16, and <italic>M. phyllosphaerae</italic> YB1, were identified and quantified using GC/MS following headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME). The data showed that there was no significant difference in the inhibitory effects of strains H16, J1, XYDH11, and XYAJ8 grown in the four different media (<xref rid="SM2" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S9</xref>). Further, the mean inhibition rate of the eight bacteria grown on LB plates (41.7%) was the highest, whereas the mean inhibition rates on NA, PSA, and PDA plates were 33.5, 31.4, and 33.8%, respectively. Therefore, LB was selected for the analysis of bacterial VOCs. <italic>P</italic>. <italic>monsensis</italic> H16, which showed the highest inhibition rate, was dual-cultured with <italic>C. fructicola</italic> in two-sealed plates for 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120&#x2009;h, and the results confirmed that 24&#x2009;h was the best time (data not shown).</p>
<p>Based on the treatment and bacterial volatile-profile analysis, 47 compounds were identified after analyzing the uninoculated sterile medium, and each strain was cultured in the medium using the NIST reference database comparison with similarity above 90% (<xref rid="SM2" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S10</xref>). The eight selected bacterial isolates with diverse antifungal activity against <italic>C. fructicola</italic> indicated different chemical classes, including ketones, alkanes, alkenes, alcohols, pyrazines, and phenols; however, different strains of the same species did not have the same composition, such as <italic>B. velezensis</italic> XYAH1 and XYCJ12. Additionally, VOCs in the ketone chemical group were present in the volatile profiles of most bacterial isolates and were generally among the most abundant chemical groups (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tab1">Table 1</xref>). The most common VOCs produced by the <italic>Bacillus</italic> isolates were 2-heptanone, 6-methyl-2-heptanone, 4-ethyl-decane, 2-decanone, 2-dodecanone, 2-heptadecanone, 2-heptanone, 2-hexadecanone, 2-nonanone, 2-tridecanone, butylated hydroxytoluene, D-limonene, dibutyl phthalate, and benzyl alcohol. The abundant VOCs methoxy-phenyl-oxime and dimethyl-silanediol produced by <italic>B. subtilis</italic> AJ4, were distinguishable from the VOCs produced by all other <italic>Bacillus</italic> isolates. In <italic>P</italic>. <italic>monsensis</italic> H16, volatile compounds especially ketones, were the most abundant and varied compounds particularly 2-nonanone, 2-undecanone, and tridecanone. In contrast, <italic>M. phyllosphaerae</italic> YB1 mainly contains benzyl alcohol, 4-ethyl-decane, phenylethyl alcohol, and cetene (<xref rid="SM2" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S10</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Main chemical compounds of VOCs produced by bacterial isolates via analysis of HS-SPME/GC&#x2013;MS.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="top">Bacterial isolates</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Compounds</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">RT (min)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">RA (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">S (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">Antifungal property</th>
<th align="center" valign="top">References</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="5"><italic>B. subtilis</italic><break/>XYAJ8</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>2-heptanone</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>6.00</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>15.45</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>90</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Sidorova et al. (2023)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>6-methyl-2-heptanone</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>8.58</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>6.89</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>94</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Zhang et al. (2022)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>5-methyl-2-heptanone</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>8.98</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>7.77</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>93</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Morita et al. (2019)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">D-limonene</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">11.48</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">4.42</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">95</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Wang Q. H. et al. (2020)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Wang Z. et al. (2020)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">Pentacosane</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">21.49</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">2.57</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">91</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Al-Maawali et al. (2023)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="5"><italic>B. subtilis</italic> AJ4</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>Dimethyl-silanediol</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>3.79</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>21.15</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>91</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Unknown</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>Methoxy-phenyl-oxime</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>8.60</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>44.22</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>90</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Unknown</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Barghouthi et al. (2017)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">2-ethyl-3,5-dimethyl-Pyrazine</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">13.51</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">1.048</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">94</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Cherniienko et al. (2022)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">Tetradecane</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">25.16</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">1.58</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">98</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Yuan et al. (2012)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">Pentadecane</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">28.98</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">1.29</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">97</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Yuan et al. (2012)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="6"><italic>B. velezensis</italic><break/>XYAH1</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>2-heptanone</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>6.04</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>13.92</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>94</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Sidorova et al. (2023)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>6-methyl-2-heptanone</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>8.59</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>25.38</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>95</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Zhang et al. (2022)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>2-nonanone</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>14.16</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>4.82</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>95</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Yuan et al. (2012)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref71">Zheng et al. (2013)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">2-tridecanone</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">28.70</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">3.05</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">96</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Yuan et al. (2012)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">2-tetradecanone</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">30.75</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">3.46</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">91</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Yuan et al. (2012)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">2-hexadecanone</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">34.13</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">3.17</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">96</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Unknown</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="5"><italic>B. velezensis</italic> XYCJ12</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>2-heptanone</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>6.03</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>13.33</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>94</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Sidorova et al. (2023)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>6-methyl-2-heptanone</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>8.58</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>8.34</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>95</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Zhang et al. (2022)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>2-tridecanone</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>28.71</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>6.96</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>97</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Yuan et al. (2012)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">2-tetradecanone</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">30.58</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">4.74</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">93</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Yuan et al. (2012)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">2-hexadecanone</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">34.13</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">5.80</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">95</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Unknown</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="5"><italic>B</italic>. <italic>receus</italic> XYDH11</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">D-limonene</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">11.50</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">2.23</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">95</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Wang Q. H. et al. (2020)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Wang Z. et al. (2020)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">Benzyl alcohol</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">11.76</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">4.62</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">96</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref68">Zhang et al. (2006)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>4-ethyl-decane</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>12.94</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>18.81</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>90</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Unknown</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>Pentacosane</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>21.21</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>6.21</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>90</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Al-Maawali et al. (2023)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>1-decene</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>27.86</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>7.33</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>93</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Unknown</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="5"><italic>B. altitudinis</italic> J1</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>6-methyl-2-heptanone</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>8.60</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>10.54</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>95</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Zhang et al. (2022)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>D-limonene</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>11.47</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>3.01</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>95</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">Wang Q. H. et al. (2020)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref58">Wang Z. et al. (2020)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>4-ethyl-decane</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>13.14</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>9.00</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>90</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Unknown</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">2-hexadecanone</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">34.13</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">2.65</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">93</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Unknown</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">Dibutyl phthalate</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">36.45</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">2.56</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">96</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Hu et al. (2022)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="5"><italic>P</italic>. <italic>monsensis</italic> H16</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>2-nonanone</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>14.24</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>15.67</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>94</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Yuan et al. (2012)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Sidorova et al. (2023)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>2-undecanone</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>21.63</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>14.68</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>95</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Yuan et al. (2012)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">Sidorova et al. (2023)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>2-tridecanone</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>28.82</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>16.55</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>98</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Yuan et al. (2012)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">2-heptadecanol</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">29.03</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">3.68</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">91</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Unknown</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">2-pentadecanone</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">33.22</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">4.67</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">96</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">No</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Yuan et al. (2012)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="5"><italic>M. phyllosphaerae</italic> YB1</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>Benzyl alcohol</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>11.72</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>20.69</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><bold>98</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref68">Zhang et al. (2006)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">Hern&#x00E1;ndez Flores et al. (2022)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>4-ethyl-decane</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>12.94</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>20.59</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>90</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Unknown</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>Phenylethyl alcohol</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>14.73</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>12.0</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom"><bold>91</bold></td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref64">Xing et al. (2018)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">Surovy et al. (2023)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">Benzyl methyl ketone</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">15.28</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">2.32</td>
<td align="center" valign="bottom">95</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Unknown</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="top">Cetene</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">30.55</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">9.82</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">95</td>
<td align="center" valign="top">Yes</td>
<td align="center" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Bhat et al. (2020)</xref></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Volatile organic compounds were extracted by SPME and identified through GC&#x2013;MS. Top five of identified compounds in relative area concentration of each isolate and their retention times in GC chromatogram were listed in the table. The compounds with relatively high concentration were in bold text. RT represents the retention times in minutes. RA represents the relative peak area (relative area concentration) of the different compounds detected for each bacterial isolate, expressed as a percentage. S(%), similarity percentage.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="sec20">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Conventional methods for controlling crop diseases mainly rely on the use of chemical pesticides. However, increasing evidence suggests that biological control using beneficial microorganisms (bacteria, fungi, and yeasts) is a safe and promising approach for the management of plant diseases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Liu et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Radhakrishnan et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Hong et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Mehmood et al., 2023</xref>). Particularly, endophytic bacteria have been isolated from various medicinal plants, which have potential biological control properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">Shurigin et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">Tripathi et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Kashyap et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>Chinese plums are susceptible to a variety of diseases, including anthracnose, leaf spots, brown rot, shoot blight, bacterial shot-holes, and fruit blotching (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Long et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Huang et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">Shu et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Lu et al., 2022a</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Lei et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref60">Wen et al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Liu et al., 2023a</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">b</xref>). Anthracnose is one of the most serious diseases resulting in destructive leaf blight in the pearl plum cultivar., in Guangxi, China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Huang et al., 2022</xref>). Therefore, in this study, we investigated 249 endophytic bacteria from <italic>A. conyzoides</italic> for their <italic>in vitro</italic> antagonistic activity against <italic>C. fructicola</italic> and screened for potential biocontrol agents to control anthracnose of pearl plum. We found that 27 bacterial strains showed varying antifungal activity levels in both the confrontation plate assay and the two-sealed-plate assay. In addition, culture filtrate of the isolates could also inhibit spore germination of <italic>C. fructicola</italic> completely or partly (data not shown). These findings indicated that the antagonistic properties of these strains may be orchestrated by the emission of soluble and volatile antimicrobial compounds produced by endophytic bacteria with multiple modes of action. Indeed, microscopic observation showed that the morphological alteration in the hyphal structure of <italic>C. fructicola</italic> induced by isolate AH7 resulted from different substances with different modes of action.</p>
<p>Based on physiological and biochemical indicators, as well as molecular characterization, 25 isolates were classified as different <italic>Bacillus</italic> species, including <italic>B. velezensis</italic>, <italic>B. subtilis</italic>, <italic>B. altitudinis,</italic> and <italic>B. cereus</italic>, and two other isolates were identified as <italic>P</italic>. <italic>monsensis</italic> and <italic>M. phyllosphaerae</italic>. Previous studies have demonstrated the potential of many <italic>Bacillus</italic> and <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> species for fungal disease control (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Ashwini and Srividya, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Guevara-Avenda&#x00F1;o et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Jin et al., 2019</xref>). For instance, the soil-associated <italic>B. subtilis</italic> strain HN-2 controls <italic>C</italic>. <italic>gloeosporioides</italic> by producing the soluble antifungal lipopeptide bacillomycin D, which injures the cell wall and cell membrane of the hyphae and spores, resulting in the exudation of the cytoplasm and organelles inside the cell (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Jin et al., 2019</xref>). Some rhizobacteria, such as <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> and <italic>Bacillus</italic>, emitted VOCs with antifungal activity against <italic>C</italic>. <italic>gloeosporioides</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Guevara-Avenda&#x00F1;o et al., 2019</xref>). Similarly, soil-associated <italic>B. velezensis</italic> CE 100 exhibits antifungal activity against <italic>C</italic>. <italic>gloeosporioides</italic> dependent on various extracellular enzymes, cyclic tetrapeptides, and VOCs that inhibit spore germination and mycelial growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Choub et al., 2021</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">2022</xref>). However, endophytic microbes are considered one of the most suitable biocontrol agents because of their high colonization and adaptation potential compared to epiphytic microbes present above or outside the surface of plant tissues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Kashyap et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>Walnut trees inoculated with <italic>B. velezensis</italic> CE 100 culture-broth under field conditions showed only 6.5% anthracnose disease severity compared to 8.7% in the conventional treatment group and 45.1% in the control group (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Choub et al., 2021</xref>). During the pot experiment in our work, pearl plum seedlings inoculated with <italic>B. velezensis</italic> XYAH1 showed a disease index of 0.7% in the treatment group and 59.3% in the control group. In short, the eight representative isolates that were sprayed before inoculating the fungal pathogen <italic>C. fructicola</italic> in the pre-treatment showed highly effective prevention efficacy ranging from 86.5 to 100%. Further, seven isolates that were sprayed after inoculating the pathogen in the treatment also showed high biocontrol potential, with efficacies ranging from 76.1 to 98.8%, except <italic>M. phyllosphaerae</italic> YB1. Thus, our study clearly showed that endophytic bacteria have the potential to be used as effective biocontrol agents against Chinese plum anthracnose. Nonetheless, additional work is needed to determine the feasibility of their application against multiple strains of the pathogen and in real production environments.</p>
<p>In our study, 27 isolates from <italic>A. conyzoides</italic> exhibited diverse antagonistic activities in both the confrontation plate assay and the two-sealed-plate assay. In addition, eight representative isolates showed varying degrees of inhibition against a series of fungal pathogens <italic>in vitro</italic>. Previous studies revealed that endophytes inhibit fungal phytopathogens through several mechanisms: (1) competition for resources, (2) induced systemic resistance, (3) siderophore production, (4) production of soluble antimicrobial compounds, and (5) emission of antimicrobial VOCs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Kashyap et al., 2023</xref>). Thus, for instance, the endophytic <italic>B. subtilis</italic> strain 1-L-29 from <italic>Camellia oleifera</italic>, which can produce indole acetic acid, solubilized phosphate, and siderophores, and grow on N-free media, demonstrated antagonistic activity against <italic>C. siamense</italic>, <italic>C</italic>. <italic>asianum</italic>, <italic>Fusarium proliferatum</italic>, <italic>Agaricodochium camellia</italic>, and <italic>P. syringae</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref65">Xu et al., 2020</xref>). Similarly, <italic>B. tequilensis</italic> strain YCC 155 from <italic>Crotalaria pallida</italic> has a direct antifungal effect on <italic>C. fructicola</italic> and induces enhanced resistance in <italic>C. oleifera</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref72">Zhou A. et al., 2022</xref>). Additionally, <italic>B. velezensis</italic> BR-01, which produces protease, cellulase, &#x03B2;-1,3-glucanase, chitinase, indoleacetic acid, siderophore, and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase, etc., shows strong antagonistic activity against a variety of rice pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref73">Zhou J. et al., 2022</xref>). In turn, <italic>P. fluorescens</italic> strain BSR2010 from <italic>Bletilla striata</italic> exhibits inhibitory effects against <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>, <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>, <italic>Micrococcus luteus</italic>, and <italic>Pectobacterium carotovorum</italic> subsp. <italic>carotovorum</italic> presumably by producing 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol (2,4-DAPG) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">Wang et al., 2021</xref>). These studies indicate that endophytic bacteria isolated from medicinal plants can produce several antimicrobial or bioactive compounds with novel structures. Therefore, using endophytic bacteria present in medicinal plants is of great theoretical and practical value.</p>
<p>Microbial VOCs are particularly important in pathogen suppression and microbial interactions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">Tyc et al., 2016</xref>). Volatiles have the advantage of easy diffusion in ambient air and in the air contained in soil pores, whereby they can reach farther distances than bacterial soluble compounds in the soil. Previous studies have shown the antagonistic effects of VOCs produced by the genus <italic>Bacillus</italic> against a wide range of fungal pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Guevara-Avenda&#x00F1;o et al., 2019</xref>). <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> are also capable of emitting antimicrobial VOCs that inhibit the mycelial growth of <italic>Phytophthora infestans</italic>, <italic>Ceratocystis fimbriata,</italic> and <italic>Rhizoctonia solani</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Elkahoui et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref69">Zhang et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Gfeller et al., 2022</xref>). In this study, the VOCs profile of eight representative bacterial isolates were analyzed and the compounds belonged principally to ketones, alkanes, alkenes, alcohols, pyrazines, and phenols (<xref rid="SM2" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary Table S10</xref>). Many compounds were common to the different isolates. Compared to other VOCs, ketones were produced in particularly high amounts. Most of the compounds showed antifungal activities. A previous study revealed that a <italic>B. amyloliquefaciens</italic> isolate showed antifungal activity against <italic>F</italic>. <italic>oxysporum</italic> f. sp. <italic>cubense</italic>, due to the emission of 2-nonanone, 2-decanone, 2-tridecanone, and 2,3,6-trimethylphenol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref67">Yuan et al., 2012</xref>). 2-nonanone and 2-decanone are also emitted by <italic>Bacillus pumilus</italic> and <italic>B. thuringiensis</italic>, and show inhibitory effects on the mycelial growth of <italic>C</italic>. <italic>gloeosporioides</italic> in postharvest mangoes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref71">Zheng et al., 2013</xref>). Moreover, 6-methyl-2-heptanone showed inhibited mycelial growth and conidial vitality of <italic>A. solani</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref70">Zhang et al., 2022</xref>) and 5-methyl-2-heptanone was considered to be the causative antifungal VOC against <italic>A. alternata</italic>, <italic>Cladosporium cladosporioides</italic>, <italic>Curvularia lunata</italic>, <italic>F</italic>. <italic>oxysporum</italic>, and <italic>Penicillium italicum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Morita et al., 2019</xref>). These studies indicated that the antifungal activity of ketones was negatively correlated with the number of carbon atoms in the ketones. Notably, in this study, 2-nonanone, 2-undecanone, and 2-tridecanone were the most abundant compounds produced by <italic>P</italic>. <italic>monsensis</italic> H16, which significantly inhibited the mycelial growth of <italic>C. fructicola</italic>. The alkane 2-tridecanone and pentacosane might be involved in the suppression of <italic>Alternaria alternata</italic> and other fungi (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Al-Maawali et al., 2023</xref>). However, the ketone 2-decanone and 2-heptanone, and the alkane 4-ethyl-decane and tetradecane seemed to have no inhibition effects on the mycelial growth of <italic>Rhizopus stolonifer</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref63">Wu et al., 2020</xref>). Methoxyphenyl-oxime exhibited a selective antibacterial activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Barghouthi et al., 2017</xref>). Whether this substance possesses antifungal activity needs to be confirmed in further study.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="sec21">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Twenty-seven bacterial isolates screened for their antagonistic activities <italic>in vitro</italic> and <italic>in vivo</italic> against <italic>C. fructicola</italic> were obtained from the medicinal plant <italic>A. conyzoides</italic> for the first time. Particularly, eight representative strains, including <italic>B. velezensis</italic> XYAH1 and XYCJ12, <italic>B. subtilis</italic> XYAJ8 and AJ4, <italic>B</italic>. <italic>creceus</italic> XYDH11, <italic>B. altitudinis</italic> J1, <italic>P</italic>. <italic>monsensis</italic> H16, and <italic>M. phyllosphaerae</italic> YB1 showed high biocontrol efficacy against Chines plum anthracnose in potted plant experiments, but additional work needs to be done to determine the feasibility of application of them. Further, several <italic>Bacillus</italic> isolates showed broad-spectrum inhibitory activities against a variety of fungal phytopathogens. The VOCs profile analysis of the eight representative bacterial isolates revealed a total of 47 compounds, most of which were determined to be ketone, while others included alkanes, alkenes, alcohols, pyrazines, and phenols. These strains have the potential to be used as biocontrol agents for plant diseases. Integrated use of these strains such as the synthesis of mental nanoparticles using the bacterial metabolites with other control strategies could be a promising alternative method to control Chinese plum anthracnose and other plant diseases. However, further study should be conducted in this aspect.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="sec22">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref rid="SM1" ref-type="supplementary-material">Supplementary material</xref>, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="author-contributions" id="sec23">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>XC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Validation, Writing &#x2013; original draft. MZ: Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. LT: Investigation, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. SH: Investigation, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. TG: Investigation, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing. QL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="sec24">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was supported by the Guangxi Key Research and Development Program (Guike AB20159041).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="sec25">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec100" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="supplementary-material" id="sec26">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1296755/full#supplementary-material" ext-link-type="uri">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1296755/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.DOCX" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_2.DOCX" id="SM2" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Al-Maawali</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Al-Sadi</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alsheriqi</surname> <given-names>S. A. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Al-Sabahi</surname> <given-names>J. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Velazhahan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>The potential of antagonistic yeasts and bacteria from tomato phyllosphere and fructoplane in the control of <italic>Alternaria</italic> fruit rot of tomato</article-title>. <source>All Life</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>34</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>48</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/26895293.2020.1858975</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ashwini</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Srividya</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Potentiality of <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> as biocontrol agent for management of anthracnose disease of chilli caused by <italic>Colletotrichum gloeosporioides</italic> OGC1</article-title>. <source>Biotech</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>127</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>136</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13205-013-0134-4</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28324440</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aydi Ben Abdallah</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jabnoun-Khiareddine</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nefzi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mokni-Tlili</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Daami-Remadi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Biocontrol of <italic>Fusarium</italic> wilt and growth promotion of tomato plants using endophytic bacteria isolated from <italic>Solanum elaeagnifolium</italic> stems</article-title>. <source><italic>J</italic>. <italic>Phytopathol</italic>.</source> <volume>164</volume>, <fpage>811</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>824</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jph.12501</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barghouthi</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ayyad</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ayesh</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abu-Lafi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Isolation, identification, and characterization of the novel antibacterial agent methoxyphenyl-oxime from <italic>Streptomyces pratensis</italic> QUBC97 isolate</article-title>. <source><italic>J</italic>. <italic>Antibiot</italic>. <italic>Res</italic>.</source> <volume>1</volume>:<fpage>105</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15744/2574-5980.1.105</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bhat</surname> <given-names>M. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Talie</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wani</surname> <given-names>A. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lone</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Chemical composition and antifungal activity of essential oil of <italic>Rhizopogon</italic> species against fungal rot of apple</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Bio. Sci.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>296</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>308</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Boukaew</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prasertsan</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Troulet</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bardin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Biological control of tomato gray mold caused by <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> by using <italic>Streptomyces</italic> spp</article-title>. <source><italic>J</italic>. <italic>BioControl</italic></source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10526-017-9825-9829</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cannon</surname> <given-names>P. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Damm</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnston</surname> <given-names>P. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weir</surname> <given-names>B. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title><italic>Colletotrichum</italic> - current status and future directions</article-title>. <source><italic>Stud</italic>. <italic>Mycol</italic>.</source> <volume>73</volume>, <fpage>181</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>213</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3114/sim0014</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23136460</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chahal</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nanda</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Akkol</surname> <given-names>E. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sobarzo-S&#x00E1;nchez</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Arya</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaushik</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title><italic>Ageratum conyzoides</italic> L. and its secondary metabolites in the management of different fungal pathogens</article-title>. <source>Molecules</source> <volume>26</volume>:<fpage>2933</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/molecules26102933</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34069197</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cherniienko</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pawe&#x0142;czyk</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zaprutko</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Antimicrobial and odour qualities of alkylpyrazines occurring in chocolate and cocoa products</article-title>. <source><italic>Appl</italic>. <italic>Sci</italic>.</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>11361</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/app122211361</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Choub</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ajuna</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Won</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moon</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choi</surname> <given-names>S. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maung</surname> <given-names>C. E. H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Antifungal activity of <italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic> CE 100 against anthracnose disease (<italic>Colletotrichum gloeosporioides</italic>) and growth promotion of walnut (<italic>Juglans regia</italic> L.) trees</article-title>. <source><italic>Int</italic>. <italic>J</italic>. <italic>Mol</italic>. <italic>Sci</italic>.</source> <volume>22</volume>:<fpage>10438</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms221910438</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34638782</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Choub</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Won</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ajuna</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moon</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Choi</surname> <given-names>S. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lim</surname> <given-names>H. I.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Antifungal activity of volatile organic compounds from <italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic> CE 100 against <italic>Colletotrichum gloeosporioides</italic></article-title>. <source>Horticulturae</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>557</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/horticulturae8060557</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cortazar-Murillo</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>M&#x00E9;ndez-Bravo</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Monribot-Villanueva</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garay-Serrano</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kiel-Mart&#x00ED;nez</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ram&#x00ED;rez-V&#x00E1;zquez</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Biocontrol and plant growth promoting traits of two avocado rhizobacteria are orchestrated by the emission of diffusible and volatile compounds</article-title>. <source><italic>Front</italic>. <italic>Microbiol</italic>.</source> <volume>14</volume>:<fpage>1152597</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1152597</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37206331</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>De Clerck</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vanhoutte</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hebb</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Geerinck</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Devos</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Vos</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Isolation, characterization, and identification of bacterial contaminants in semifinal gelatin extracts</article-title>. <source><italic>Appl</italic>. <italic>Environ</italic>. <italic>Microbiol</italic>.</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>3664</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3672</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aem.70.6.3664-3672.2004</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15184171</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>X. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>M. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <source>Manual for systematic identification of common bacteria</source>. <publisher-loc>Beijing</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Science Press</publisher-name>, <fpage>364</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>398</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dowling</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peres</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Villani</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schnabel</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Managing <italic>Colletotrichum</italic> on fruit crops: A "complex" challenge</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>104</volume>, <fpage>2301</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2316</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/pdis-11-19-2378-fe</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Elkahoui</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dj&#x00E9;bali</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yaich</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Azaiez</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hammami</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Essid</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Antifungal activity of volatile compounds-producing <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> P2 strain against <italic>Rhizoctonia solani</italic></article-title>. <source>World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>175</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>185</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11274-014-1772-3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25384611</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fanning</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Topp</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Russell</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stanley</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Netzel</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Japanese plums (<italic>Prunus salicina</italic> Lindl.) and phytochemicals&#x2013;breeding, horticultural practice, postharvest storage, processing and bioactivity</article-title>. <source>J. Sci. Food Agric.</source> <volume>94</volume>, <fpage>2137</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2147</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jsfa.6591</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><citation citation-type="other"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab id="coll1">Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations</collab></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). World production of plums and sloes. Available at: <ext-link xlink:href="http://www.fao.org/faostat/zh/#data/QC" ext-link-type="uri">http://www.fao.org/faostat/zh/#data/QC</ext-link> (Accessed August 11, 2023)</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gfeller</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fuchsmann</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Vrieze</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gindro</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weisskopf</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Bacterial volatiles known to inhibit <italic>Phytophthora infestans</italic> are emitted on potato leaves by <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> strains</article-title>. <source>Microorganisms.</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>1510</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms10081510</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35893568</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grahovac</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paj&#x010D;in</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vlajkov</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title><italic>Bacillus</italic> VOCs in the context of biological control</article-title>. <source>Antibiotics (Basel)</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>581</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/antibiotics12030581</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36978448</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guevara-Avenda&#x00F1;o</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bejarano-Bol&#x00ED;var</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kiel-Mart&#x00ED;nez</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ram&#x00ED;rez-V&#x00E1;zquez</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>M&#x00E9;ndez-Bravo</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>von Wobeser</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Avocado rhizobacteria emit volatile organic compounds with antifungal activity against <italic>Fusarium solani</italic>, <italic>Fusarium</italic> sp. associated with Kuroshio shot hole borer, and <italic>Colletotrichum gloeosporioides</italic></article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Res.</source> <volume>219</volume>, <fpage>74</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>83</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.micres.2018.11.009</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30642469</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hassan</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>Y. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title><italic>Colletotrichum</italic> species associated with Japanese plum (<italic>Prunus salicina</italic>) anthracnose in South Korea</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>12089</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-019-48108-1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31427596</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hern&#x00E1;ndez Flores</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mart&#x00ED;nez</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramos L&#x00F3;pez</surname> <given-names>M. &#x00C1;.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salda&#x00F1;a Gutierrez</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reyes</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Armendariz Rosales</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Volatile organic compounds produced by <italic>Kosakonia cowanii</italic> Cp1 isolated from the seeds of <italic>Capsicum pubescens</italic> R &#x0026; P possess antifungal activity</article-title>. <source>Microorganisms</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>2491</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms11102491</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37894149</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Holt</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Krieg</surname> <given-names>N. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sneath</surname> <given-names>P. H. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Staley</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <source>Bergey&#x2019;s manual of determinative bacteriology</source>. <publisher-loc>Baltimore, MD</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Williams and Wilkins Press</publisher-name>, <fpage>195</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>256</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hong</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>T. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Won</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moon</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ajuna</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>K. Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Control of fungal diseases and fruit yield improvement of strawberry using <italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic> CE 100</article-title>. <source>Microorganisms</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>365</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms10020365</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35208819</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Genomic and metabolic features of <italic>Bacillus cereus</italic>, inhibiting the growth of <italic>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</italic> by synthesizing secondary metabolites</article-title>. <source>Arch. Microbiol.</source> <volume>205</volume>:<fpage>8</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00203-022-03351-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36454319</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gui</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Identification and observation of infection processes of <italic>Colletotrichum</italic> species associated with pearl plum anthracnose in Guangxi, China</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>106</volume>, <fpage>3154</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3165</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/pdis-04-22-0765-re</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35549326</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Long</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lam</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Roles of plant-associated microbiota in traditional herbal medicine</article-title>. <source>Trends Plant Sci.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>559</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>562</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tplants.2018.05.003</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29802067</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xuan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dahar</surname> <given-names>G. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Q. X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Antifungal mechanism of bacillomycin D from <italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic> HN-2 against <italic>Colletotrichum gloeosporioides</italic> Penz</article-title>. <source>Pestic. Biochem. Physiol.</source> <volume>163</volume>, <fpage>102</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>107</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.11.004</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31973845</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kashyap</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>V. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumari</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Biocontrol screening of endophytes: applications and limitations</article-title>. <source>Plants (Basel)</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>2480</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants12132480</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37447041</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>K&#x00F6;berl</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schmidt</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ramadan</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bauer</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berg</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>The microbiome of medicinal plants: diversity and importance for plant growth, quality and health</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>4</volume>:<fpage>400</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2013.00400</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24391634</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lei</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ke</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>First report of brown rot caused by <italic>Monilia mumecola</italic> on Chinese plum (<italic>Prunus salicina</italic>) in Fujian, China</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>107</volume>:<fpage>2845</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/pdis-01-23-0127-pdn</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sui</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wisniewski</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Droby</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Review: utilization of antagonistic yeasts to manage postharvest fungal diseases of fruit</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>167</volume>, <fpage>153</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>160</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.09.004</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24135671</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023a</year>). <article-title>Bacterial leaf spot of plum caused by <italic>Sphingomonas spermidinifaciens</italic> in Guangxi, China</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>107</volume>:<fpage>2839</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/pdis-04-23-0685-pdn</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023b</year>). <article-title>Leaf spot of sanhua plum caused by <italic>Botryosphaeria wangensis</italic> in China</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>107</volume>:<fpage>2888</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/pdis-12-22-2960-pdn</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Long</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Long</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shu</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>First report of fruit blotch on plum caused by <italic>Fusarium fujikuroi</italic> in China</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>105</volume>:<fpage>2256</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/pdis-08-20-1784-pdn</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022a</year>). <article-title>First report of anthracnose of sanhua plum caused by <italic>Colletotrichum aeschynomenes</italic> in Guangxi, China</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>107</volume>:<fpage>1223</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/pdis-05-22-1172-pdn</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022b</year>). <article-title>First report of leaf blight caused by <italic>Fusarium pernambucanum</italic> and <italic>Fusarium sulawesiense</italic> on plum in Sichuan, China</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis</source>. <volume>106</volume>:<fpage>2759</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/pdis-12-21-2672-pdn</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mehmood</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saeed</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zafarullah</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hyder</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rizvi</surname> <given-names>Z. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gondal</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Multifaceted impacts of plant-beneficial <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> spp. in managing various plant diseases and crop yield improvement</article-title>. <source>ACS Omega</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>22296</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>22315</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acsomega.3c00870</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37396244</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Momin</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ibrahim</surname> <given-names>K. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Endophytic bacteria isolated from <italic>Ageratum conyzoides</italic> L. and <italic>Mikania micrantha</italic> Kunth of Mizoram, Northeast India</article-title>. <source>Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>355</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>358</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s40009-020-01013-y</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Morita</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tanaka</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ryuda</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ikari</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ueno</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Someya</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Antifungal spectrum characterization and identification of strong volatile organic compounds produced by <italic>Bacillus pumilus</italic> TM-R</article-title>. <source>Heliyon</source> <volume>5</volume>:<fpage>e01817</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01817</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31206088</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Radhakrishnan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hashem</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abd Allah</surname> <given-names>E. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title><italic>Bacillus</italic>: A biological tool for crop improvement through bio-molecular changes in adverse environments</article-title>. <source>Front. Physiol.</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>667</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fphys.2017.00667</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28932199</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roberts</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nakamura</surname> <given-names>L. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cohan</surname> <given-names>F. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title><italic>Bacillus mojavensis</italic> sp. nov., distinguishable from <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> by sexual isolation, divergence in DNA sequence, and differences in fatty acid composition</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>256</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>264</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/00207713-44-2-256</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rodr&#x00ED;guez-Cisneros</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Morales-Ru&#x00ED;z</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Salazar-G&#x00F3;mez</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rojas-Rojas</surname> <given-names>F. U.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Santos</surname> <given-names>E.-d. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Compilation of the antimicrobial compounds produced by <italic>Burkholderia Sensu Stricto</italic></article-title>. <source>Molecules</source> <volume>28</volume>:<fpage>1646</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/molecules28041646</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36838633</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roussos</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Nutritional composition of fruit cultivars plum. (<italic>Prunus domestica</italic> L. and <italic>P. salicina</italic> Lindl.)</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Bio. Sci.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>639</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>666</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-12-408117-8.00026-X</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ryu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suh</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jung</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>B. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Biological control of <italic>Colletotrichum panacicola</italic> on <italic>Panax ginseng</italic> by <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> HK-CSM-1</article-title>. <source>J. Ginseng Res.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>215</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>219</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jgr.2014.05.001</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25378997</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shu</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Long</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Detection and control of <italic>Pantoea agglomerans</italic> causing plum bacterial shot-hole disease by loop-mediated isothermal amplification technique</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>896567</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.896567</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35694300</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shurigin</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alaylar</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Davranov</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wirth</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bellingrath-Kimura</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Egamberdieva</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Diversity and biological activity of culturable endophytic bacteria associated with marigold (<italic>Calendula officinalis</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>AIMS Microbiol.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>336</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>353</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3934/microbiol.2021021</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34708176</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sidorova</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khmel</surname> <given-names>I. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chernikova</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chupriyanova</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Plyuta</surname> <given-names>V. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Biological activity of volatiles produced by the strains of two <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> and two <italic>Serratia</italic> species</article-title>. <source>Folia Microbiol. (Praha)</source> <volume>68</volume>, <fpage>617</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>626</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12223-023-01038-y</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36790684</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Soo</surname> <given-names>K. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Younmi</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wonsu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jungwook</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tae</surname> <given-names>K. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kotnala</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Characterization of <italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic> AK-0 as a biocontrol agent against apple bitter rot caused by <italic>Colletotrichum gloeosporioides</italic></article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>626</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-020-80231-2</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33436839</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Surovy</surname> <given-names>M. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rahman</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rost&#x00E1;s</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Islam</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>von Tiedemann</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Suppressive effects of volatile vompounds from <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp. on <italic>Magnaporthe oryzae Triticum</italic> (MoT) pathotype, causal agent of wheat blast</article-title>. <source>Microorganisms</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>1291</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms11051291</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37317265</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>Q. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C. X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Data processing system (DPS) software with experimental design, statistical analysis and data mining developed for use in entomological research</article-title>. <source>Insect Sci.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>254</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>260</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1744-7917.2012.01519.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23955865</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tripathi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pandey</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tripathi</surname> <given-names>S. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kalra</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Perspectives and potential applications of endophytic microorganisms in cultivation of medicinal and aromatic plants</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>985429</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2022.985429</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36247631</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tyc</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dickschat</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vos</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Garbeva</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The ecological role of volatile and soluble secondary metabolites produced by soil bacteria</article-title>. <source>Trends Microbiol.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>280</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>292</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tim.2016.12.002</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28038926</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qu</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>Y. K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Identification, virulence and fungicide sensitivity of <italic>Colletotrichum gloeosporioides</italic> s.s. responsible for walnut anthracnose disease in China</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>104</volume>, <fpage>1358</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1368</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/pdis-12-19-2569-re</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>F. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>A. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Isolation and identification of an endophytic bacterium from <italic>Bletilla striata</italic> and preliminary study of antibacterial mechanism</article-title>. <source>J. South Cent. Univ. Natl. Nat. Sci. Ed.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>246</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>251</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12130/znmdzk.20210305</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title><italic>Morganella morganii</italic> as a causative agent of disease in the Chinese Giant salamander (<italic>Andrias davidianus</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Asian Herpetol. Res.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>197</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>201</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3724/SP.J.1245.2013.00197</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhong</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Antifungal activity of volatile organic compounds produced by <italic>Pseudomonas fluorescens</italic> ZX and potential biocontrol of blue mold decay on postharvest citrus</article-title>. <source>Food Control</source> <volume>120</volume>:<fpage>107499</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107499</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Genetic diversity analysis of Chinese plum (<italic>Prunus salicina</italic> L.) based on whole-genome resequencing <italic>tree genet</italic></article-title>. <source>Genomes</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11295-021-01506-x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title><italic>Phytophthora nicotianae</italic>: a new threat to Sanhua plum (<italic>Prunus salicina</italic>) causing shoot blight in China</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>166</volume>, <fpage>329</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>339</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-023-02665-4</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref61"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wicaksono</surname> <given-names>W. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>E. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Casonato</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Monk</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ridgway</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Biological control of <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> pv. <italic>Actinidiae</italic> (<italic>Psa</italic>), the causal agent of bacterial canker of kiwifruit, using endophytic bacteria recovered from a medicinal plant</article-title>. <source>Biol. Control</source> <volume>116</volume>, <fpage>103</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>112</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.03.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yeh</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>ISSR analysis of genetic diversity and structure of plum varieties cultivated in southern China</article-title>. <source>Biology (Basel)</source> <volume>8</volume>:<fpage>2</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/biology8010002</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30577627</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref63"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tong</surname> <given-names>X. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mei</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Y. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Suppression of <italic>Rhizopus</italic> fruit rot by volatile organic compounds produced by <italic>Paenibacillus polymyxa</italic> CF05</article-title>. <source>Biomed. Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>1351</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1364</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/09583157.2020.1826902</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref64"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xing</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xim</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Antifungal activity of natural volatile organic compounds against litchi downy blight pathogen <italic>Peronophythora litchii</italic></article-title>. <source>Molecules</source> <volume>23</volume>:<fpage>358</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/molecules23020358</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29419754</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref65"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>J. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>G. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>L. X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Isolation and characterization of <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> strain 1-L-29, an endophytic bacteria from <italic>Camellia oleifera</italic> with antimicrobial activity and efficient plant-root colonization</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>15</volume>:<fpage>e0232096</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0232096</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32339210</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref66"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yamamoto</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Harayama</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>PCR amplification and firect sequencing of <italic>gyrB</italic> genes with universal primers and their application to the detection and taxonomic analysis of <italic>Pseudomonas putida</italic> strains</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>61</volume>:<fpage>3768</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aem.61.10.3768-3768.1995</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16535156</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref67"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Raza</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Antifungal activity of <italic>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</italic> NJN-6 volatile compounds against <italic>Fusarium oxysporum</italic> f. sp.<italic>cubense</italic></article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>5942</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5944</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.01357-12</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22685147</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref68"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z. Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wan</surname> <given-names>X. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Antifungal activities of major tea leaf volatile constituents toward <italic>Colletorichum camelliae</italic> massea</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source> <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>3936</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3940</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jf060017m</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref69"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Antifungal effect of volatile organic compounds produced by <italic>Pseudomonas chlororaphis</italic> subsp. <italic>aureofaciens</italic> SPS-41 on oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction of <italic>Ceratocystis fimbriata</italic></article-title>. <source>Pestic. Biochem. Physiol.</source> <volume>173</volume>:<fpage>104777</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pestbp.2021.104777</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33771256</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref70"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qiang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Mechanism of a volatile organic compound (6-Methyl-2-Heptanone) emitted from <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> ZD01 against <italic>Alternaria solani</italic> in potato</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>808337</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.808337</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35095815</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref71"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Antimicrobial effects of volatiles produced by two antagonistic <italic>Bacillus</italic> strains on the anthracnose pathogen in postharvest mangos</article-title>. <source>Biol. Control</source> <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>200</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>206</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.02.004</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref72"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Antifungal action and induction of resistance by <italic>Bacillus</italic> sp. strain YYC 155 against <italic>Colletotrichum fructicola</italic> for control of anthracnose disease in <italic>Camellia oleifera</italic></article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>956642</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.956642</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36090068</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref73"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Characterization of a <italic>Bacillus velezensis</italic> strain isolated from <italic>Bolbostemmatis Rhizoma</italic> displaying strong antagonistic activities against a variety of rice pathogens</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>983781</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.983781</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36246295</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>