Detecting and characterizing new endofungal bacteria in new hosts: Pandoraea sputorum and Mycetohabitans endofungorum in Rhizopus arrhizus

The fungus Rhizopus arrhizus (=R. oryzae) is commonly saprotrophic, exhibiting a nature of decomposing organic matter. Additionally, it serves as a crucial starter in food fermentation and can act as a pathogen causing mucormycosis in humans and animals. In this study, two distinct endofungal bacteria (EFBs), associated with individual strains of R. arrhizus, were identified using live/dead staining, fluorescence in situ hybridization, transmission electron microscopy, and 16S rDNA sequencing. The roles of these bacteria were elucidated through antibiotic treatment, pure cultivation, and comparative genomics. The bacterial endosymbionts, Pandoraea sputorum EFB03792 and Mycetohabitans endofungorum EFB03829, were purified from the host fungal strains R. arrhizus XY03792 and XY03829, respectively. Notably, this study marks the first report of Pandoraea as an EFB genus. Compared to its free-living counterparts, P. sputorum EFB03792 exhibited 28 specific virulence factor-related genes, six specific CE10 family genes, and 74 genes associated with type III secretion system (T3SS), emphasizing its pivotal role in invasion and colonization. Furthermore, this study introduces R. arrhizus as a new host for EFB M. endofungorum, with EFB contributing to host sporulation. Despite a visibly reduced genome, M. endofungorum EFB03829 displayed a substantial number of virulence factor-related genes, CE10 family genes, T3SS genes, mobile elements, and significant gene rearrangement. While EFBs have been previously identified in R. arrhizus, their toxin-producing potential in food fermentation has not been explored until this study. The discovery of these two new EFBs highlights their potential for toxin production within R. arrhizus, laying the groundwork for identifying suitable R. arrhizus strains for fermentation processes.


Introduction
Bacteria residing within the vegetative or reproductive structures of fungi are referred to as endofungal or endohyphal bacteria (EFBs or EHBs), representing one of the most intricate relationships between bacteria and fungi (Deveau et al., 2018;Pawlowska et al., 2018).The presence of EFBs was initially reported by Mosse (1970) through electron microscopy in the cytoplasm of Endogone spores.In the following decades, researchers discovered EFBs in various species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), distinguishing two shapes (rod-shaped and irregularly coccoid; MacDonald and Chandler, 1981;Sward, 1981;Scannerini and Bonfante-Fasolo, 1991;Schüßler et al., 1994).EFBs were later identified using bacteria-specific dyes, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with bacteria-specific probes, and pyrosequencing (Sun et al., 2019).They were categorized into facultative and obligate based on their in vitro cultivability (Mondo et al., 2012;Bonfante and Desirò, 2017;Uehling et al., 2017Uehling et al., , 2023)).The symbiotic relationship between EFBs and host fungi involves mutualistic benefits and occasional antagonism (Lastovetsky et al., 2020;Venkatesh et al., 2022), impacting asexual and sexual reproduction of the host fungi (Partida-Martinez et al., 2007c;Mondo et al., 2017).This symbiosis extends to form a tripartite interaction with plants or animals, contributing to plant or animal health and performance (Desirò et al., 2015;Guo and Narisawa, 2018;Büttner et al., 2023;Cappelli et al., 2023).The EFB-fungi interaction has gained attention due to its relevance to agriculture and industry.
The genus Rhizopus, characterized by abundant rhizoids on hyphae and stolons, encompasses 12 species widely distributed in soil and air, playing key roles in industrial, agricultural, and medical applications (Zheng et al., 2007;Liu et al., 2019;Zhao et al., 2023).Notably, R. arrhizus and R. microsporus are crucial in food fermentation and mucormycosis (Cheng et al., 2017;Yao et al., 2018;Rudramurthy et al., 2023), presenting concerns about the role of EFBs in mucormycosis infection, especially in the context of COVID-19 complications (Dogra et al., 2022).Recent studies have screened EFB-free strains of R. arrhizus to ensure food safety during fermentation (Hamza and Gunyar, 2022).The impact of EFB Ralstonia pickettii in R. microsporus on phagocyte evasion and opportunistic virulence has been reported (Itabangi et al., 2022).The presence of EFB Mycetohabitans rhizoxinica in a cancer patient further emphasizes the role of endosymbionts in the virulence of their host fungus R. microsporus (Yang et al., 2022).While mucormycosis is usually caused by co-infection of R. arrhizus and R. microsporus, the contribution of EFB to the pathogenesis of R. arrhizus remains to be confirmed.
To date, five EFB species have been detected in Rhizopus arrhizus, including two unnamed BREs and three named Gammaproteobacteria (Serratia marcescens, Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Klebsiella pneumoniae; Ibrahim et al., 2008;Itabangi et al., 2019;Birol and Gunyar, 2021).In this study, we confirmed the presence of two Burkholderiaceae EFBs in different parts of R. arrhizus through 16S rDNA sequencing and microscopic observation.To assess their potential impact on food safety and toxin production, we conducted a comparative analysis of their genetic background through wholegenome resequencing.

Strains
This study utilized two strains, XY03792 and XY03829, of Rhizopus arrhizus.The XY03792, sourced from soy sauce in Malaysia, is a fermentative strain.The XY03829 is a wild strain obtained from animal dung in Pakistan.Both strains demonstrated the capability to ferment, resulting in the production of various compounds such as maltose, glucose, ethanol, lactic acid, fumaric acid, malic acid, glycerol, among others (Yao et al., 2018;Liu et al., 2022).These strains were preserved at Shandong Normal University under −20°C with 15% glycerine.

Manipulation and cultivation
To prevent bacterial contamination, sporangiospores underwent a meticulous two-step surface sterilization process following the method outlined by Becard and Fortin (1988).In the initial step, sporangiospores were immersed in a 0.05% Tween 20 solution for two minutes, followed by a 10 min soak in a 2% chloramine T solution.Subsequently, they were thoroughly rinsed three times with sterile distilled water.This soak and wash procedure was repeated once more, after which the sporangiospores were preserved in a sterile solution containing 200 mg/L streptomycin and 100 mg/L gentamicin at 4°C.Moving to the second step, the stored sporangiospores underwent another round of soaking in a 2% chloramine T solution and were washed with sterile distilled water immediately before inoculation.The surface-sterilized sporangiospores, treated through this two-step process, were then cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA: 200 g/L potato, 20 g/L glucose, 20 g/L agar, and 1,000 mL distilled water) at 30°C.

Visualizing EFB by microscopic observation Live/dead staining
The Live/dead BacLight Bacterial Viability Kit (catalogue number L7012, Invitrogen, United States) was employed for the initial detection of EFBs following the method outlined by Arendt et al. (2016) andTakashima et al. (2018).Fresh hyphae and sporangiospores, obtained by scraping from the fungal colony on PDA, were deposited onto a glass slide along with 15.00 μL of a 1:1:200 mixed stain solution (SYTO9: propidium iodide: sterile 0.85% NaCl).Subsequently, cover slips were mounted onto the slide, and the preparation was incubated at room temperature in darkness for a few minutes.The stained hyphae and sporangiospores were then examined using an inverted fluorescence microscope (Axio observer Z1, Zeiss, Germany).

Transmission electron microscopy
To precisely determine their specific location within the mycelium, EFB were visualized using transmission electron microscopy (TEM).A small mycelial pellet from a 3 days-old culture of Rhizopus arrhizus XY03829 was fixed with 0.1% glutaraldehyde/4% paraformaldehyde in 1× Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS, pH 7.0) for 1 h at 25°C and subsequently overnight at 4°C.The pellets were then embedded in a drop of water agar and subjected to five washes with 1 × PBS.Further fixation was performed with a 1% (w/v) osmium tetraoxide (OsO4) solution for one hour.After three rinses with 1 × PBS, the samples underwent sequential dehydration in an ethanol series and were then immersed three times in 100% acetone.For infiltration, the samples were treated with a 3:1 acetone-resin mixture for 0.5 h, 1:1 for 1 h, and 1:3 for 1.5 h.Subsequently, the fungal samples were embedded in fresh Spurr resin and polymerized for 12 h at 70°C.Ultrathin sections were cut using an ultramicrotome (EM FC7, LEICA) and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate.The grids were examined using a JEM-1400Plus transmission electron microscope with an EM-14830RUBY2 charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at an acceleration voltage of 100 kV.

Isolation and identification of EFB
To isolate endosymbiotic bacteria, the host fungi were cultivated on PDA at 28°C for 3 days.A pellet of thalli, sterilized glass beads, and 1 mL lysogeny broth (LB: 10 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, 10 g/L NaCl) were added to a 2 mL centrifuge tube.The mixture was homogenized using a high-throughput tissue grinder (SCIENTZ-48) at 45 Hz for 30 s.The homogenized tissue fluid was then filtered through a 5 μM membrane and spread on lysogeny agar (LA: 10 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, 10 g/L NaCl, agar 30 g/L).Finally, it was incubated at 30°C for 7 days, and a single colony was transferred to another LA plate.

EFB genome sequencing and comparative genomic analysis
A single colony of EFBs grown on LA plates was inoculated into 15 mL of LB medium and shaken at 180 rpm at 37°C for 18 h.Bacterial cells were collected by centrifugation, and genomic DNAs were extracted using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (A1120) following the manufacturer's instructions.DNA integrity was verified on an agarose gel.Whole-genome resequencing was performed on the BENAGEN platform using Nanopore and Illumina NovaSeq PE150 platforms.
Transposase and integrase sequences were sourced from the NCBI protein database, followed by clustering and classification using transposon and integron annotation databases, respectively.Initially, the Diamond blast+ software (version 0.9.31;Buchfink et al., 2015) was employed to compare genome and protein sequences against the Uniprot database.The outcomes of this comparison were integrated with the pre-constructed transposon and integron annotation databases to facilitate the prediction of transposons and integrons.Genomic collinearity analysis was conducted using the MAUVE (Darling et al., 2004).Subsequently, based on the results obtained from the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) and the Virulence Factor Database (VFDB), a Venn diagram illustrating differences in gene numbers was generated using the Venny website. 13 Two free-living Pandoraea sputorum strains, NCTC13161 (BioProject ID: PRJEB6403) and DSM21091 (BioProject ID: PRJNA262705), were downloaded from the NCBI database as references for P. sputorum EFB03792.The genome of EFB Mycetohabitans endofungorum HKI456 (BioProject ID: PRJNA370785) was used as the reference for M. endofungorum EFB03829.

Curing fungal strains and co-culturing with free-living EFB
The strains, preserved at −20°C with 15% glycerine, were inoculated on PDA plates supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillin, 50 μg/mL kanamycin, 10 μg/mL tetracycline, and 40 μg/mL ciprofloxacin.The plates were then incubated at 28°C for 36 h.Subcultures were performed under the same conditions for 30 generations.In each generation, the strain's morphology was documented through photography and verified using live/dead staining.The cured fungal strain and free-living EFB isolated from the corresponding wild-type strain were simultaneously inoculated at the same position on lysogeny agar (LA) plates to observe whether the cured fungi resumed sporulation.

Molecular detection and identification of EFBs
The 16S rDNA was successfully amplified from the metagenome of the two strains of the fungus Rhizopus arrhizus, resulting in a target fragment with a length of approximately 1.5 kb.These sequences were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers OL413494 and OL413496.Identical 16S rDNA sequences were also annotated from the metagenome of the corresponding fungal strains.The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of EFBs based on 16S rDNA sequences is presented in Figure 1.In this phylogram, the two EFBs individually residing in the R. arrhizus strains XY03792 and XY03829 were grouped into the clades Pandoraea sputorum and Mycetohabitans endofungorum, respectively.Specifically, P. sputorum exhibited a close relationship with P. apista and P. norimbergensis, while M. endofungorum was closely related to M. rhizoxinica.

In situ detection of EFBs
Following live/dead staining, EFBs with green fluorescence were observed within the hyphae, columellae, and sporangiospores of both fungal strains (Figures 2A-I).Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) revealed red fluorescence in the hyphae of Rhizopus arrhizus XY03792 (Figures 2K-N), while green fluorescence was observed in the hyphae of R. arrhizus XY03829 (data not shown), confirming the presence of specific EFBs.Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images showed clear transverse sections of bacterial rods (Figure 2J), indicating the localization of EFBs within the cytoplasm of fungal mycelia rather than in vacuoles.The bacteria within the cytosol were distinguishable from fungal organelles due to their visible cell walls, nucleoids, reserve materials, and morphology.The cross-section size of these cells ranged from 0.6 to 0.8 μm in diameter.

General genome features of EFBs
The genome of Pandorea sputorum EFB03792 comprised approximately 1.00 Gb of clean data from the Nanopore sequencing platform, encompassing 22,138 reads with an average sequence read length of 45,173 bp, achieving full coverage (100%) and an average sequencing depth of around 171×.The Illumina-filtered clean data amounted to approximately 1.19 Gb, encompassing 7,962,964 reads with an average sequence read length of 150 bp, achieving full coverage (100%) and an average sequencing depth of approximately 203×.The assembled genome contained one circular chromosome spanning 5,845,363 bp with a GC content of 62.63%.A total of 5,215 gene models were encoded, including 5,099 coding sequences (CDS), 75 transfer RNA (tRNA), 12 ribosomal RNA (rRNA), and two transfermessenger RNA (tmRNA) (Figure 3A and Table 1).
The genome of Mycetohabitans endofungorum EFB03829 consisted of approximately 1.00 Gb of clean data from the Nanopore sequencing platform, encompassing 30,159 reads with an average sequence read length of 33,158 bp, achieving full coverage (100%) and an average sequencing depth of around 273×.The Illumina-filtered clean data amounted to 1.14 Gb, encompassing 7,598,064 reads with
The COG annotation results (Supplementary Figure S1) indicated that M. endofungorum EFB03829 had fewer genes in all groups compared to P. sputorum EFB03792, except for mobile genes, which were more in EFB03792 than in EFB03829 (35 vs. 12, Supplementary Figure S1).
CARD annotation revealed that P. sputorum EFB03792 possessed a unique drug resistance gene, specifically the FAD-containing monooxygenase EthA, which confers resistance to ethionamide through antibiotic target alteration.There were no differences in drug resistance genes between M. endofungorum EFB03829 and HKI45.

Gene structure of EFBs
For Pandorea sputorum, compared with the free-living strains NCTC13161 and DSM21091, the endosymbiotic strain EFB03792 exhibited an inversion in the structure for more than half of its genes (Figure 5A) and contained a higher number of mobile elements (111 vs. 60; Table 1).
Concerning Mycetohabitans endofungorum, in comparison with the obligate endosymbiotic strain HKI456, the facultative endosymbiotic strain EFB03829 displayed a significant number of genes involved in inversion and/or translocation (Figure 5B) and contained a much larger number of mobile elements (1,517 vs. 392; Table 2).

CAZy analyses in EFBs
In this study, CAZy annotation was performed on five strains, namely Mycetohabitans endofungorum EFB03829, HKI456, Pandoraea sputorum EFB03792, DSM21091, and NCTC13161.The newly assembled genomes of M. endofungorum EFB03829 and P. sputorum EFB03792 were predicted with three and six CE10 family genes, respectively, while the other three genomes lacked (Figure 6).The CE10 family genes encoded some enzymes that catalyzed the hydrolysis of carboxylic ester bonds, such as acetyl-hydrolase, monoterpene epsilon-lactone hydrolase, acetyl esterase/lipase, and carboxylesterase.

Type III secretion system predicted in EFBs
In this study, 24 and 74 genes related to the type III secretion system (T3SS) were predicted from Mycetohabitans endofungorum EFB03829 and Pandorea sputorum EFB03792, respectively (Supplementary File S6), and M. endofungorum EFB03829 and P. sputorum EFB03792 have completely T3SS.The T3SS of M. endofungorum EFB03829 have five ATPase complexes, two basal bodies, four cytoplasmic rings, three export apparatuses, eight regulators, and two invasion protein genes.The T3SS of P. sputorum EFB03792 exhibited five ATPase complexes, eight basal bodies, six cytoplasmic rings, six export apparatuses, 45 regulators, and five invasion protein genes.

Morphological changes of cured fungal strains
Rhizopus arrhizus underwent continuous sub-culturing on a PDA plate containing antibiotics.Throughout the subculturing process, the sporangiophores of the strain XY03829 exhibited increased bending, and the production of sporangiospores gradually decreased.Starting from the 22nd generation, no sporangiospores were formed, and the strain could not recover to produce any sporangiospores (Figure 7).In contrast, the mycelial morphology of R. arrhizus XY03792 remained unchanged during the subculturing process.

New endofungal bacteria in Rhizopus
With the progress in exploring EFBs, an increasing number of Burkholderia-related endobacteria (BRE) and Mycoplasma-related endobacteria (MRE) have been identified in fungi, especially within the phylum Mucoromycota (Bianciotto et al., 2003;Partida-Martinez et al., 2007b  Pandoraea sputorum represents an emerging human pathogen known for inducing a pro-inflammatory response that can lead to lung dysfunction in individuals with cystic fibrosis (Xiao et al., 2019).This pathogenic microorganism has been exclusively isolated from respiratory tract sources (Pimentel and Macleod, 2008;Martínez-Lamas et al., 2011;Fernández-Olmos et al., 2012;Pugès et al., 2015;Kwizera et al., 2017) and blood samples (Xiao et al., 2019).Alongside this species, the pathogenic genus Pandoraea includes ten other species (Xiao et al., 2019).While these species have been identified in various specimens, such as sputum, blood, urine, lung tissue, and wounds, they have not been observed within fungi.Therefore, this study marks the initial proposal of the pathogenic bacterium Pandoraea as an EFB genus, particularly thriving within a potential pathogenic fungus of Rhizopus arrhizus.This underscores the heightened relevance of this genus in the field of medicine.
It has been reported that the EFB Mycetohabitans rhizoxinica plays a role in enhancing sporulation in the host fungus Rhizopus microsporus (Partida-Martinez et al., 2007c).In this study, we detected EFB M. endofungorum in the host fungus R. arrhizus, a species closely related to R. microsporus (Liu et al., 2008).The cured R. arrhizus exhibited impaired growth and an inability to produce sporangiospores, underscoring the essential role of EFB M. endofungorum in the growth and reproduction of R. arrhizus.Attempts to restore sporulation through co-culturing on LB plates were unsuccessful, likely attributed to the limited infectivity of EFB03829 on the host.Laser-mediated microinjection (Partida-Martinez et al., 2007c) emerges as a potential superior method for the reintroduction of M. endofungorum into its host R. arrhizus.

Gene structure and specific genes of the two EFBs
Based on the complete assembly genome sequences available in the NCBI database 14 for the Burkholderia genus, it is observed that 14 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomeThis represents a significant reduction when compared to its Burkholderia spp.counterparts.While the genome of Pandoraea sputorum EFB03792 (5.85 Mb) does not exhibit notable streamlining when compared to other strains of the same species of P. sputorum, which range from 5.74 Mb to 6.45 Mb (see footnote 14).The prevailing consensus is that obligate endosymbionts undergo genome reduction as an adaptation to their reliance on host-derived resources (Uehling et al., 2023).In contrast, facultative endosymbiotic bacteria are generally not subject to genome reduction (Baltrus et al., 2017).Both M. endofungorum and P. sputorum are facultative endosymbiotic bacteria, demonstrating the ability to thrive not only within fungal mycelia but also on artificial media.Surprisingly, M. endofungorum EFB03829 exhibited a remarkable genome reduction.According to Salvioli et al. (2017), the genome of Mycetohabitans rhizoxinica includes toxin-antitoxin modules (TAs), which involve in modulating growth under stress conditions and promoting survival in host cells.M. endofungorum also harbors TAs in its genome, potentially influencing the regulation of fungal endobacteria life (Lackner et al., 2011b;Salvioli et al., 2017).The genomes of both M. endofungorum and Pandorea sputorum strains encompass genes associated with virulence factors.And M. endofungorum has demonstrated the ability to produce the toxin rhizonin, exhibiting significant nonspecific hepatotoxicity (Partida-Martinez et al., 2007a).Previous research has indicated that the two R. arrhizus strains under investigation can undergo fermentation to generate glucose and lactic acid for food fermentation purposes (Liu et al., 2022).Consequently, the potential EFBs may pose a risk of toxin production in fermented foods.
The analyses of collinearity indicated a more pronounced change in the gene structure of M. endofungorum EFB03829 compared to P. sputorum EFB03792 (Figure 5).Furthermore, M. endofungorum EFB03829 possesses a significantly higher number of mobile elements (1,517) than M. endofungorum HKI456 (392) and P. sputorum (60-111; Table 1).The repeated insertion and loss of mobile elements,  including prophages, can contribute to genome reduction and alterations in gene structure (Vale et al., 2022).Thus, the substantial presence of mobile genetic elements in M. endofungorum EFB03829 is implicated in its genome reduction and structural changes.CAZymes, or Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes, play a key role in metabolism, involved in the synthesis, modification, and degradation of carbohydrates, including polysaccharides, glycoproteins, and glycolipids (Drula et al., 2022).Our results suggested that the newly sequenced genomes were annotated several CE10 family genes, suggesting their involvement in the metabolism of various compounds in the host R. arrhizus, including drugs, pesticides, and lipids.
The type III secretion system (T3SS) plays a vital role in maintaining symbiosis and is highly conserved in the genomes of Gram-negative pathogenic or symbiotic bacteria (Deng et al., 2017), such as endosymbiont Candidatus Glomeribacter gigasporarum associated with the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) Gigaspora margaritain (Ghignone et al., 2012) and Burkholderia rhizoxinica in the zygomycetous fungus Rhizopus microsporus (Lackner et al., 2011a).In our study, we predicted 74 and 24 genes related to T3SS in P. sputorum EFB03792 and M. endofungorum EFB03829, respectively, indicating their role as symbiotic bacteria with Rhizopus arrhizus.The identification of these specific genes in our study contributes to a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the actions of symbiotic bacteria in fungi during invasion and colonization stages.

Conclusion
This study presents a comprehensive investigation of two bacterial species, Pandoraea sputorum EFB03792 and Mycetohabitans endofungorum EFB03829, in association with Rhizopus arrhizus strains based on live/dead staining, FISH, TEM, and 16S rDNA sequencing.The genes number of CAZymes form Mycetohabitans endofungorum (EFB03829 and HKI456) and Pandoraea sputorum (EFB03792, DSM21091, and NCTC13161).The wild-type R. arrhizus strains more than 22 sub-cultures on a medium containing antibiotics.The results showed that M. endofungorum could control the sporulation of R. arrhizus, while P. sputorum had no significant effect on the morphology of R. arrhizus.
The genome sequencing results indicate that M. endofungorum EFB03829 underwent genome reduction, resulting in a smaller genome size compared to P. sputorum EFB03792.Despite its reduced genome, EFB03829 contains more mobile genetic elements.Gene annotation revealed the presence of toxin genes in both EFBs.This raises potential safety concerns for food fermentation involving R. arrhizus, as the presence of toxin genes in these endofungal bacteria may pose risks during the fermentation process.The study provides valuable insights into the interactions between EFBs and R. arrhizus, highlighting the need for careful consideration of safety aspects in food fermentation processes involving these microorganisms.

FIGURE 1 A
FIGURE 1 A maximum likelihood consensus phylogenetic tree of Burkholderia-related endobacteria (BRE) showing the placement of Pandoraea sputorum EFB03792 and Mycetohabitans endofungorum EFB03829.The Candidatus Glomeribacter gigasporarum was used as outgroup.All nodes with maximum likelihood bootstrap values (MLBV) and Bayesian inference posterior probabilities (BIPP) >80% and >0.90 are successively labelled and separated by a slash "/."Sequences obtained herein are marked with a red star "*." GenBank accession numbers are shown after the species name.Background colours indicate groups [blue, BRE (A-C); red, Mycetohabitans spp.; yellow, Paraburkholderia spp.; brown, Pandoraea spp.; green, Candidatus Glomeribacter gigasporarum].The lower left bar represents 0.01 expected substitutions per site.

TABLE 1
Genomic features of Pandoraea sputorum and Mycetohabitans endofungorum sequenced and de novo assembled in this study.Pandoraea sputorum, a member of the family Burkholderiaceae, has never been previously detected within fungal hosts.

TABLE 2
Numbers of mobile genetic elements in Pandoraea sputorum and Mycetohabitans endofungorum.