Abstract
Microbial biopolymers have emerged as promising solutions for environmental pollution-related human health issues. Poly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA), a natural anionic polymeric compound, is composed of highly viscous homo-polyamide of D and L-glutamic acid units. The extracellular water solubility of PGA biopolymer facilitates its complete biodegradation and makes it safe for humans. The unique properties have enabled its applications in healthcare, pharmaceuticals, water treatment, foods, and other domains. It is applied as a thickener, taste-masking agent, stabilizer, texture modifier, moisturizer, bitterness-reducing agent, probiotics cryoprotectant, and protein crystallization agent in food industries. γ-PGA is employed as a biological adhesive, drug carrier, and non-viral vector for safe gene delivery in tissue engineering, pharmaceuticals, and medicine. It is also used as a moisturizer to improve the quality of hair care and skincare cosmetic products. In agriculture, it serves as an ideal stabilizer, environment-friendly fertilizer synergist, plant-growth promoter, metal biosorbent in soil washing, and animal feed additive to reduce body fat and enhance egg-shell strength.
1 Introduction
Microbial biopolymers are gaining global popularity due to their eco-friendly, degradable, and non-toxic nature as compared to synthetic non-degradable polymers. Biopolymers are in high demand but low-yielding microbial strains and high production costs restrict their commercialization (Kreyenschulte et al., 2014). Polygamma glutamic acid (γ-PGA) is an expensive biopolymer and a few milligrams cost several dollars. It is a unique anionic homopolyamide of D- and L-glutamic acid units, which are joined together via amide linkages between α-amino and γ-carboxylic acid groups (Shih et al., 2001; Li D. et al., 2022; Li S et al., 2022) (see Figure 1).
Figure 1
γ-PGA is a completely biodegradable extracellular product that is water-soluble, edible, non-immunogenic, and harmless to humans (Young and Richard, 1988; Yoon et al., 2000). The unique properties of γ-PGA favor its applications in pharmaceuticals, medicine, cosmetics, healthcare, agricultural production, foods, and water treatment (). Currently, Bacillus species are used for the safe and natural microbial synthesis of γ-PGA. The features such as molecular weight, molecular composition, synthesis productivity, and yield determine the biological properties and industrial application of γ-PGA. Enhanced industrial demand highlights the importance of biopolymers such as γ-PGA, which could affect the existing industries and traditional commercial polymers. However, the low yield and higher costs of γ-PGA production hinder its industrial applications. These limitations can be overcome by improving the γ-PGA biosynthesis process through genetic manipulation, screening of more potent microbial producers, the use of a better culture medium, and the optimization of microbial culturing conditions. The following sections emphasize the novel theoretical studies and advanced techniques of γ-PGA microbial synthesis in the future (Bajaj et al., 2011; ; Li et al., 2022).
The reasons for microbial γ-PGA production remains not fully understood; however, it is suggested that it is to protect the cells from phages, antibodies, antimicrobial peptides, and detrimental environmental conditions. Moreover, it facilitates microbial adhesion to nutrient particles and serves as a nitrogen and carbon source during starvation (Mesnage et al., 1998; Luo et al., 2016; Sirisansaneeyakul et al., 2017). γ-PGA function depends on the environment, producing microorganisms, and released or bound peptidoglycan. Peptidoglycan-bound γ-PGA could confer virulence or serve as a glutamate source under starving conditions (Kimura et al., 2004; Kocianova et al., 2005) whereas environmental release of γ-PGA helps in an organism’s survival under unfavorable conditions (McLean et al., 1990).
The capsules of virulent B. anthracis strains solely contain γ-D-PGA where the D enantiomer contributes to non-immunogenic properties (Tomcsik and Szongott, 1933; Zwartouw and Smith, 1956; ). Contrarily, some soil bacterial species are known for the environmental release of γ-PGA that helps in toxic metal ion sequestration for enhanced resistance under unfavorable environments (McLean et al., 1990). Natrialba aegyptiaca, Planococcus halophilus, and Sporosarcina halophila employ γ-PGA to mitigate higher concentrations of local salt for better survivability under hostile environments (Kandler et al., 1983; ). Marine eukaryotic Cnidaria explosively uses stinging cells (nematocysts) for locomotion, protection, and the capturing of prey. They produce large amounts of γ-PGA that assist in triggering the cellular explosive reaction (Weber, 1990). γ-PGA has been reported in mice neurons, which alters tubulin and Ca2+ interaction and tubulin-associated proteins to regulate the microtubule dynamics (). Bacillus amyloliquefaciens C06 uses γ-PGA for enhanced motility and biofilm formation. γ-PGA sticks the cells together in a coordinated pattern for better absorption of essential environmental nutrients to enhance microbial motility (Liu et al., 2010).
2 PGA producing microorganisms
discovered the PGA as a Bacillus anthracis capsule that was released into the medium on aging, cell autolysis, and autoclaving (). Several γ-PGA-producing strains have been identified but Bacillus species, particularly B. subtilis and B. licheniformis, remain the most potent γ-PGA producers (Luo et al., 2016; Sirisansaneeyakul et al., 2017). Shih et al. (2001) have categorized γ-PGA-producing bacteria into two groups based on their nutrient requirements for γ-PGA synthesis. One group needs L-glutamic acid in the growth medium whereas the other group does not require L-glutamic acid for γ-PGA production. L-glutamic acid-dependent bacteria include B. subtilis CGMCC 0833, B. licheniformis 9945a (Wu et al., 2010b), B. subtilis (chungkookjang) (), B. subtilis (natto) ATCC 15245 (), and B. licheniformis NK-03 (). γ-PGA producers that do not require L-glutamic acid include B. subtilis C10 (Zhang H. et al., 2012), B. subtilis C1 (Shih et al., 2005), and B. amyloliquefaciens LL3 (). The PGA yield of L-glutamic acid-dependent bacteria increases with the rise in medium concentration of L-glutamic acid. However, these bacteria can also adopt the de novo pathway for γ-PGA production in the absence of exogenous L-glutamic acid (Kunioka and Goto, 1994; ). A simple fermentation process and low-cost L-glutamate-independent γ-PGA producers are more desirable for industrial production as compared to glutamate-dependent γ-PGA producers (). However, their lower γ -PGA productivity than L-glutamate-dependent producers hinders industrial application. Therefore, genetically engineered non-glutamate-dependent producers such as B. amyloliquefaciens NK-1 () and laboratory strains such as B. subtilis 168, E. coli, and B. subtilis MA41 have been developed for a higher γ-PGA yield (; ; Scoffone et al., 2013).
2.1 γ-PGA production with Bacillus licheniformis
Bacillus licheniformis is widely used for γ-PGA production; particularly, the B. licheniformis 9945a (NCIM 2324) strain is well known for γ-PGA production. Multiple studies have optimized γ-PGA production to retrieve maximum yield. adopted solid-state fermentation to enhance B. licheniformis NCIM 2324-based γ-PGA production. They followed the ‘one factor at a time’ method to examine the effects of moisture content, solid substrates, pH, nitrogen and carbon sources, TCA cycle intermediates, and amino acids on γ-PGA production. The optimized media produced a maximum γ-PGA yield of 98.64 mg/g dry solids with solid fermentation. Response surface methodology was further applied to optimize the nutrient concentrations in the medium, which were experimentally tested. A significantly higher γ-PGA yield (26.12 g/L) was noted with the optimized medium [glycerol (62.4 g/L); ammonium sulphate (8.0 g/L); citric acid (15.2 g/L); and L-glutamic acid (20 g/L)] as compared to the basal medium (5.27 g/L). The produced γ-PGA had a molecular mass of 2.16105 Da. Based on these findings, the authors developed a more efficient system and obtained a γ-PGA production of 35.75 g/L using the B. licheniformis NCIM 2324 strain. This is the highest reported production of γ-PGA with a B. licheniformis strain in the submerged fermentation process. This was achieved by supplementing B. licheniformis NCIM 2324 medium with L-glutamine (0.07 g/L) and α-ketoglutaric acid (1.46 g/L), which served as metabolic precursors for γ-PGA production. γ-PGA yield was considerably high (35.75 g/L) in the metabolic precursor-supplemented medium in comparison to the medium without these precursors (26.12 g/L). Thus, precursors facilitated better utilization of L-glutamic acid by the studied strain. Mabrouk et al. (2012) followed the Plackett–Burman design to optimize the medium [glucose (50 g/L); K2HPO4 (6.4 g/L); NH4Cl (3 g/L); MgSO4.7H2O, (0.8 g/L); yeast extract (2 g/L); NaCl (0.8 g/L); FeSO4.4H2O (0.006 g/L); CaCl2.2H2O (0.00084 g/L); trace element solution (0.1 mL), and culture volume (25 mL)] and achieved a γ-PGA yield of 28.2 g/L using an exogenous glutamate-independent strain B. licheniformis A13. Medium volume and yeast extract mainly affected the γ-PGA production. The Plackett–Burman experimental design has also been applied to assess the culture requirements of B. licheniformis SAB26 (Soliman et al., 2005). γ-PGA production was evaluated against fifteen variables mainly including (NH4)2SO4, K2HPO4, KH2PO4, and casein hydrolysate. The use of an L-glutamic acid nitrogen source alleviated the γ-PGA production of B. licheniformis SAB-26 and thus it was classified as a glutamate-independent γ-PGA producing strain. Ogunleye et al. (2015) noted a three times higher γ-PGA yield (33.5 g/L) on an optimized medium as compared to a basal medium.
2.2 γ-PGA production with Bacillus subtilis
discovered that B. subtilis fermentation leads to γ-PGA secretion into the medium. This discovery attracted the researchers to further investigate B. subtilis-based γ-PGA production. B. subtilis strains have been more thoroughly studied for γ-PGA production than B. licheniformis strains. Scoffone et al. (2013) recently evaluated the γ-PGA production by knocking out two γ-PGA-degrading enzyme genes (ggt and pgdS) in B. subtilis 168 (laboratory strain). They studied the effects of double (deletion of both genes) and single (one gene at a time) mutations on γ-PGA yield. Single mutations did not significantly improve the γ-PGA production whereas double mutation led to a twofold increase (40 g/L) in γ-PGA yield compared to the WT strain. However, the weight average molecular mass and number average molecular mass of produced γ-PGA were comparatively lower in double-mutant strains than in single-mutant and WT strains. The highest molecular mass (36,106 Da) was noted in the pgdS mutant strain, which could be attributed to decreased endo-degradation activities. have reported cost-effective high-yield and large-scale γ-PGA production with B. subtilis ZJU-7 (B. subtilis CGMCC1250). They stated that 30 g/L L-glutamate, 40 g/L yeast extract, 20 g/L initial glucose, and a glucose concentration range of 3–10 g/L significantly enhanced the γ-PGA production (1.4 to 3.2-fold) following a fed-batch approach in comparison to batch fermentation. Overall, γ-PGA concentration and productivity remained at 101.1 g/L and 2.19 g/L, respectively. optimized the solid-state fermentation of B. subtilis CCTCC202048 for γ-PGA production. They achieved a maximum γ-PGA yield of 83.61 g/L (kg dry solids) with a mixed substrate (11:9 w/w) of soybean cake powder and wheat bran along with glutamate (40.14 kg/L), NH4NO3 (20.05 kg/L), citric acid (18.50 kg/L), and mineral salts (FeCl3.6H2O, MgSO4.7H2O, MnSO4.H2O, and CaCl2.2H2O). Low production costs and high yield favor solid-state fermentation for large-scale γ-PGA production. Shih et al. (2005) used the B. subtilis C1 strain to synthesize a novel glycerol-γ-PGA derivative in an L-glutamate-lacking medium. B. subtilis C1 depended on glycerol and citric acid for γ-PGA production and the absence of any of these compounds significantly impacted the yield. The conjugate’s molecular mass (16,107 Da) was found to be higher than the super-high-molecular mass of γ-PGA reported by Park et al. (2005), which could be attributed to the glycerol in the medium. The conjugate presented an γ-PGA to glycerol ratio of 10:1 and had a higher D-glutamic acid units (97%) concentration as compared to L-glutamic acid units. Interestingly, the enantiomeric composition of glycerol-γ-PGA conjugate remained unaffected against Mn2+. Contrarily, Wu et al. (2006) have established the effects of Mn2+ on the enantiomeric and stereochemical composition of B. subtilis NX-2 produced γ-PGA. The D-glutamate proportion was noted to rise (18 to 77%) in response to variations in Mn2+ concentrations (0–0.09 g/L). Mn2+ affected γ-PGA stereochemical properties by modifying glutamate racemase activity (Ogunleye et al., 2015).
2.3 γ-PGA production with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
cloned γ-PGA synthase genes (racE and pgsBCA) from a non-L-glutamate-dependent γ-PGA producer B amyloliquefaciens LL3 and an L-glutamate-dependent γ-PGA producer B. licheniformis NK03 in E. coli JM109 and evaluated γ-PGA yield. pgsC and pgsB genes of both strains shared high similarities of 93.96 and 93.13% whereas racE and pgsA genes presented 84.5 and 78.53% similarities, respectively. The engineered strains (4) yielded γ-PGA in both L-glutamate and glucose media after 24 h of culturing. Irrespective of the harboring vector, PgsBCA of B. amyloliquefaciens LL3 exhibited better catalytic efficiency than B. licheniformis NK-03, and B. amyloliquefaciens LL3-pgsBCA yielded a higher γ-PGA quantity than B. licheniformis NK-03-pgsBCA. B. amyloliquefaciens LL3-derived RacE and PgsBCA and B. licheniformis NK-03-derived RacE and PgsBCA displayed significantly enhanced D-isomer content and productivity of γ-PGA in comparison to B. amyloliquefaciens LL3-derived PgsBCA and B. licheniformis NK-03-derived PgsBCA. It depicts that racE incorporation enhanced the γ-PGA productivity and D-isomer content. B. subtilis and Corynebacterium glutamicum were co-cultured using a mixed carbon source (sucrose and glucose) to avoid the addition of exogenous L-glutamic acid, which reduced the production cost and fermentation time, and γ-PGA had an average molecular mass of 1.246106 Da ().
2.4 γ-PGA production with other Bacillus species
Bacillus anthracis-based production of pure γ-PGA D-enantiomer has been established (Zwartouw and Smith, 1956). However, the production mechanism of B. anthracis differs from other Bacillus species as its γ-PGA remains bound to peptidoglycan and is not secreted into the medium. Thus, it complicates the purification and recovery process, which involves cell autolysis and autoclaving. Moreover, B. anthracis toxicity also restricts industrial scale γ-PGA production. The anchored γ-PGA is associated with a non-immunogenic B. anthracis capsule, which is linked to the lethal toxin (). Therefore, the γ-PGA-anchoring capping gene should be targeted to avoid B. anthracis toxicity (). Bacillus thuringiensis vs. Monterrey strain BGSC 4AJ1 is also known to produce γ-PGA capsules like B. anthracis (). B. anthracis (Ames) and B. thuringiensis sv. Monterrey strain BGSC 4AJ1 share four alleles (gmk-1, tpi-1, pta-1, and pur-1) while differing in three other alleles (pycA-52, glpF-57, and ilvd-52) by three, two, and two nucleotides, respectively. γ -D-PGA-producing plasmid (pAJ1-1) genes share similarities with B. anthracis. The discovery of γ-PGA capsule in the B. thuringiensis strain indicates its potential pathogenicity under specific conditions. Poli et al. (2015) isolated Bacillus horneckiae strain APA from a shallow hydrothermal vent of Panarea Island, Italy. They characterized it as an extracellular poly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA)-producing strain and studied its immunomodulatory and antiviral effects against the HSV-2 virus (Herpes simplex virus type 2). Tarui et al. (2005) adopted the Agrobacterium infection technique to introduce indispensable pgsBCA complex into tobacco leaves. γ-PGA production was noted only in plant tissue with all three pgsBCA genes, which yielded 600 mg γ-PGA/g leaf material (Ogunleye et al., 2015).
2.5 Halophiles-based production of γ-PGA
The cell wall of Archaebacterium Natronococcus occultus is known to contain L-glutamate (Niemetz et al., 1997). Natrialba aegyptiaca strain 40 T is extremely halophilic and was the first archaebacterium to produce extracellular poly-γ-D-(glutamate) (PGA) (, ). Then, archaebacterial strain 56 T was also characterized to produce exopolymer containing PGA (65% w/w), carbohydrates (15% w/w), and unidentified material (20% w/w) ().
2.6 γ-PGA production from genetically modified microorganisms
Spizizen (1958) devised techniques to develop recombinant Bacillus strains for the commercial production of the B. subtilis enzyme. The transformation proved a significant milestone in molecular biology. Engineered plasmids are obtained either from natural plasmids or plasmids of closely related organisms, which are inducted into a host strain through electroporation, competent cell transformation, and protoplast fusion. Plasmids can be inherited, replicated, or transcribed into host strains. Recombination occurs over several generations during the fermentation process of Bacillus species. The deletion of plasmid sequences could lead to problematic replication and segregation steps in modified plasmids. Thus, the development of mutant strains lacking relevant recombination enzymes dramatically enhanced the stability of recombinant strains. Native promoters (α-amylase gene) directing the production of extracellular proteins (20 g/L) are frequently employed in industrial microbiology. Direct DNA insertion into chromosomes by designing constructs flanked with homologous sequences to chromosomal genes produce more stable clones. The knowledge of Bacillus species nucleotide sequence offers the possibility of novel modifications to produce strains with desired traits. Gene cloning via the encoding of novel plasmid enzymes into antibiotic-resistant B. subtilis hosts helps to maintain plasmid. The induction of a dal-bearing plasmid into a dal-mutant is performed into a dal-mutant, which is unable to produce D, L-alanine racemase. D, L-racemase is necessary for the production of the cell’s D-alanine component. The genetic constructs retain selective pressure on plasmid maintenance in these hosts. Chromosomal integration of novel enzyme-expressing genes could also generate high-yielding B. subtilis strains. The amplification of genes could facilitate the development of highly efficient enzyme-producing strains for large-scale fermentation ().
B. licheniformis strains are crucial for commercial applications as their enzyme-yielding efficiency is higher than B. subtilis. A high enzyme production in these strains needs a combination of high-performance expression systems from traditional high-yielding strains and multiple copies of the target gene. The ideal strains should have a genetically stable and chromosomally integrated gene with higher expression levels and product secretion. B. licheniformis and B. subtilis have successfully fulfilled these criteria (Markcus et al., 2004).
3 Mechanism of γ-PGA biosynthesis
γ-PGA production is more expensive than traditional polymers. An understanding of the mechanism and γ-PGA biosynthesis-impacting metabolic gene clusters might help in developing improved strains for higher γ-PGA production (Ogunleye et al., 2015). Figure 2 presents the metabolic pathway of γ-PGA production and a related gene cluster. The prerequisite (L-glutamic acid) of γ-PGA production could be endogenous or exogenous. Endogenous availability activates the L-glutamic acid pathway that converts the carbon source in the medium into acetyl CoA via glycolysis followed by Krebs cycle-based synthesis of α-ketoglutaric acid. Two distinct pathways can convert α-ketoglutaric acid precursor into L-glutamic acid. Glutamate dehydrogenase converts α-ketoglutaric acid and ammonium chloride into L-glutamic acid in the absence of glutamine whereas 2-oxoglutarate aminotransferase catalyzes α-ketoglutaric acid and glutamine conversion to L-glutamic acid in the presence of L-glutamine. γ-PGA biosynthesis involves the activity of various enzymes such as peptidase, racemase, and synthase (; Wang et al., 2017).
Figure 2
3.1 Racemization of γ-PGA
γ-PGA can be a homopolymer (poly -γ-D- glutamic acid, poly-γ-L-glutamic acid) or a heteropolymer (poly-γ-DL-glutamic acid). The growing peptide chain either incorporates L-glutamic acid monomers from the medium or is synthesized by enzymes (2-oxoglutarate aminotransferase or glutamate dehydrogenase) (). However, racemase activity is necessary for D-glutamic acid synthesis, which catalyzes D-glutamic acid formation from L-glutamic acid and the process is referred to as racemization (Ashiuchi et al., 1998; Luo et al., 2016). B. subtilis contains two glutamate racemase homologous genes (yrpC and racE (glr)) (Ogunleye et al., 2015). These genes do not directly participate in γ-PGA biosynthesis but are essential for the strain’s growth in nutrient-rich (racE) and minimal medium (yrpC) (Wang et al., 2016). Contrarily, glr plays a key role in γ-PGA synthesis and forms D-glutamic acid from L-glutamic acid. The overexpression of the glr gene could enhance the D-glutamate enantiomeric ratio in B. licheniformis ().
3.2 γ-PGA synthesis and polymerization
B. anthracis contains plasmid-encoded γ-PGA biosynthesis genes whereas such genes are chromosomally inherited in some Bacillus species (; Ogunleye et al., 2015). The release or anchoring of synthesized γ-PGA depends on the gene function. Cap genes are crucial in B. anthracis for capsule formation where γ-PGA is attached to the cell surface. Contrarily, B. licheniformis or B. subtilis release γ-PGA outside the cells under the influence of pgs genes. B. anthracis cap genes (cap B, C, A, E) are homologous to B. licheniformis and B. subtilis cap genes (pgs B, C, A, E) (Figure 3). The cluster of cap genes plays a key role in γ-PGA production; however, equivalent importance of all the four pgs genes remains questionable. The investigations have concluded more importance of the pgsC and pgsB genes whereas the pgsE gene has been reported as non-essential (Wu et al., 2008; Luo et al., 2016).
Figure 3
Polymerization is an ATP-dependent process where substrate-dependent hydrolysis of ATP leads to the transfer of phosphoryl group to a terminal carboxyl group of elongated γ-PGA. Then, glutamic acid’s amino group conducts a nucleophilic attack on the phosphorylated carboxyl group to form an amide linkage and continues to γ-PGA polymerization at the synthase complex (PgsBCA) active site. PgsC and PgsB collectively form most parts of complex’s catalytic site whereas PgsA contributes to the elongated chain removal from the active site that allows the addition of next monomer and might also participate in γ-PGA transportation. PgsBCA activity is known to depend on Mg2+. Shorter phospholipid-containing less compact cell membranes could facilitate extracellular γ-PGA transportation (
3.3 Depolymerases-based γ-PGA degradation
Troy (1973) was the first to report a depolymerase enzyme that could break down PGA to glutamic acid monomer in the late stationary phase of Bacillus licheniformis. This discovery urged several researchers to further investigate this hydrolase enzyme (Kunioka and Goto, 1994; Gross, 1998; King et al., 2000). γ-PGA-synthesizing Bacillus strains contain two γ-PGA breaking enzymes (exo- and endo-glutamyl peptidase). Increased depolymerization time results in reduced dispersity as endo-glutamyl peptidase, secreted by B. licheniformis and B. subtilis in the medium, breaking high molecular weight γ-PGA into fragments (1,000 Da to 20 kDa) (Tsao, 2004). B. subtilis is known to contain endo-glutamyl peptidase encoding genes, which have the same orientation as the pgsBCA operon. Their protein contains a cleavage site (30A-E-A32) proximal to the N- and a hydrophobic cluster (10F-L-L-V-A-V-I-I-CF-L-V-P-I-M24) (Sebastián et al., 2013).
Some Bacillus species secrete peptidase enzymes (GGT (gamma-glutamyltranspeptidases)) under stress conditions or starvation for γ-PGA hydrolysis and utilize released glutamic acid as a nitrogen and carbon source. Gamma-glutamyl-hydrolase encoding pgdS gene is present downstream of the pgsBCA operon, which could degrade γ-PGA into two glutamate residues. The capD gene belongs to the family GGT, which performs dual functions such as γ-PGA anchorage and depolymerization via cleavage and relocates it to water or an acceptor molecule leading to hydrolysis or transpeptidation. Several studies have reported γ-PGA depolymerase presence and activity in B. subtilis NX-2, which carries out γ-PGA depolymerization in the batch culture (
3.4 γ-PGA regulation genes
The ComP–ComA signal transduction system is known to regulate γ-PGA yield in B. subtilis (natto) (Tran et al., 2000). Stanley and Lazazzera (2005) have reported an additional two-part system (DegS–DegU, DegQ, and SwrA) as unusual γ-PGA synthesis regulators. The transcriptional effects of ComPA, DegSU, and DegQ occur in response to phase variation signals, quorum sensing, and osmolarity, whereas SwrA activity is considered post-transcriptional. Multiple studies have investigated the DegU and SwrA relationship and revealed that phosphorylated DegU (DegU-P) and SwrA are necessary to completely activate the pgs operon leading to γ-PGA production. The effect of genes on γ-PGA production and pgs transcription remains negligible (Stanley and Lazazzera, 2005; Osera et al., 2009). Contrarily, Ohsawa et al. (2009) demonstrated direct activation of pgs expression at a high DegU-P level rather than SwrA and high degQ levels. However, SwrA was still crucial for γ-PGA synthesis under certain conditions.
4 Limitations and commercialization strategies of γ-PGA production
The biodegradability, non-toxicity, eco-friendliness, and unique properties have increased the acceptability of microbial biopolymers as compared to synthetic non-degradable materials. Biopolymers are in high demand globally but higher production costs and lower yield limit their commercial usage (Kreyenschulte et al., 2014). Recently, more interest in the commercialization of γ-PGA has been gaining immense attention due to its unique properties and its use in diverse applications. The cost of bioproducts is a crucial aspect in establishing the economic viability of a process, especially when considering its wide range of applications. γ-PGA is an expensive biopolymer and its few milligrams can cost several sterling pounds/or the sentence remain as: few milligrams cost several dollars ($173/100 mg high purity sodium salt γ-PGA; Sigma Aldrich) (Ogunleye et al., 2015). This problem can only be solved by lowering the γ-PGA production cost (Ju et al., 2014). The fundamental research target for industrial application is to optimize the fermentation medium in order to decrease the costs of biopolymer manufacturing. Nevertheless, the production costs of γ-PGA are considerably decreased as they do not need the inclusion of external glutamate (
To date, studies have mainly focused on enantiomeric composition, optimization of growth conditions for a higher yield, and achieving the desired γ-PGA molecular mass at a lower cost. The medium of γ-PGA-producing bacteria is of key importance as it can directly affect properties and the production cost of γ-PGA. Another strategy to reduce the production cost of γ-PGA is the utilization of agricultural and food industrial wastes as fermentation substrates. This not only increases productivity but also corresponds with environmentally beneficial methods, making it a green and cost-effective optimization strategy. The usage of lignocellulosic biomass such as rice straw and corncobs can be an appealing carbon source alternative (
5 γ-PGA production affecting factors
Microbial γ-PGA production is well developed, but low yield hinders its industrial usage (Luo et al., 2016). Bacterial strains and culturing medium mainly determine the cost of γ-PGA synthesis (Singh et al., 2016). Several Bacillus species can produce γ-PGA; however, some strains of Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis have gained more attention for further development.
The development of γ-PGA mass production systems could be a main step toward a feasible solution. Nutrient requirements of various bacterial strains have been investigated for better γ-PGA production. γ-PGA-producing bacteria have been categorized into two groups according to their nutrient requirements such as glutamic acid-independent and glutamic acid-dependent bacteria. Moreover, culture conditions (culture medium, medium pH, nitrogen and carbon sources, aeration, ionic strength, and agitation) also impact PGA quality and productivity (Kunioka and Goto, 1994). A detailed understanding of γ-PGA synthesis-associated genes and enzymes could facilitate bacterial manipulation for higher γ-PGA yield. However, γ-PGA yield has not yet reached the productivity of traditional producers (
5.1 Effect of media components on γ-PGA production
Media components and culture conditions are important factors for microbial γ-PGA production as they can impact its characteristics and yield. Nutritional requirements of γ-PGA production vary with L-glutamic acid-independent and -dependent Bacillus strains (Kunioka and Goto, 1994; Gross, 1998). Leonard et al. (1958) formulated the Medium E that has been extensively used to culture bacteria (Gross, 1998). Medium E contains high carbon content and mainly comprises L-glutamic acid (20 g/L), glycerol (80 g/L), citric acid (12 g/L), NH4Cl, 7 0.0; K2HP04 (0.5 g/L), MgS04.7H20 (0.5 g/L), CaCI2.2H20 (0.15 g/L), FeCI3.6H20 (0.04 g/L), and MnS04.H20 (0.104 g/L). Different media have been explored for enhanced γ-PGA production. L-glutamic acid-producing strains can even produce γ-PGA in L-glutamic acid-lacking media. Different types of fermentation media (wastes and synthetic) have been tested for γ-PGA production (Ju et al., 2014). Optimized medium composition efficiently promotes cell growth and facilitates high accumulation of precursors for γ-PGA production (
L-glutamic acid performs a diverse role in PGA-producing strains. Strain and medium components determine the required L-glutamic acid amount for PGA production. Significant interactions of L-glutamic acid with medium components require its optimization, which can directly impact PGA production cost. The L-glutamic acid to PGA conversion rate determines its effective concentration in the medium. Most studies have recommended an L-glutamic acid concentration of 20–30 g/L for PGA production (
PGA production is supported by glycerol and glucose in most glutamic acid-independent strains. Ko and Gross (1998) reported that B. licheniformis ATCC 9945A converts glucose to acetyl-CoA and TCA cycle intermediates which form L-glutamic acid to synthesize PGA. Troy (1973) stated glycerol-based stimulation of polyglutamyl synthetase, which catalyzes glutamic acid polymerization to PGA. Wu et al. (2010a) revealed that glycerol not only stimulates PGA production but also reduces its molecular weight in B. subtilis NX-2 culture.
Glycerol improves cell permeability more than glucose to facilitate the production and release of γ-PGA (Shih et al., 2001;
Citric acid serves as an effective precursor for PGA production (Jain et al., 2005;
The addition of metabolic precursors as carbon sources for γ-PGA production might achieve higher yields through enhanced enzyme activity (Nair et al., 2023).
Biomass materials or by-products can also be converted into high-value γ-PGA. Agro-industrial wastes (rapeseed meal, cane molasses, soybean residue, corncobs, crude glycerol and its hydrolysate, rice straw, and monosodium glutamate) have been investigated for γ-PGA production (Zhang D. et al., 2012; Tork et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2019). Moreover, carbonaceous substances could replace common carbon sources including dairy products, algae, animal feathers, and chicken manure (
Inorganic salts (MnSO4 and CaCl2) can significantly affect the stereochemical composition and yield of PGA. CaCl2 addition to the medium can reduce culture broth’s viscosity and increase extracellular glutamic acid consumption (11.4%) resulting in a higher yield of PGA than controls (Shih and Van, 2001;
5.2 Impact of fermentation conditions on γ-PGA production
Fermentation conditions can be modified for higher γ-PGA productivity, concentration, and yield (Table 1). Suitable culture conditions (temperature, pH, inoculation amount, and oxygen content) can efficiently enhance γ-PGA yield (
Table 1
| Isolate | Nutrients of fermentation media | Methods and key conditions | Yield (g/L) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. subtilis ZJU-7 | Glucose, l-glutamate, yeast extract, NaCl, CaCl2, MgSO4, MnSO4 | Bioreactor, 300–800 rpm, pH 6.5, 37°C | 101.1 | Huang et al. (2011) |
| B. subtilis NX-2 | Glutamate, (NH4)2SO4, K2HPO4, MgSO4, MnSO4, and hydrolysis of rice straw | Bioreactor, 400 rpm, initial pH 7.0, 32°C | 73.0 | Tang et al. (2015) |
| B. subtilis MJ80 | Glutamic acid, starch, urea, citric acid, glycerol, NaCl, K2HPO4, MgSO4, MnSO4 | Bioreactor, 37°C, 150 rpm, initial pH 7.0 | 68.7 | Ju et al. (2014) |
| B. subtilis CCTCC202048 | Swine manure, soybean cake, wheat bran, glutamic acid, citric acid | Flasks, shaking at 180 rpm, and initial pH 9.0, 37°C for 48 h | 60.00 | |
| B. subtilis NX-2 | Cane molasses and monosodium glutamate waste liquor | Bioreactor, 400 rpm, 32°C, pH 7.0 | 52.1 | Zhang D. et al. (2012) |
| B. subtilis RKY3 | Glycerol, glutamic acid yeast extract, K2HPO4 | Flasks, shaking at 200 rpm, pH 6.5, and 38°C for 48 h | 48.5 | |
| B. subtilis (natto) MR-141 | Maltose, soy sauce, sodium glutamate | Flasks, shaking at 400 rpm and pH 8 for 72 h at 40°C | 35.00 | Ogawa et al. (1997) |
| B. subtilis NX-2 | Glutamic acid, glucose yeast extract | Flasks, shaking at 220 rpm, pH 7.0, and 37°C for 24 h | 30.20 | Xu et al. (2005) |
| B. subtilis 242 | Cane molasses, l-glutamic, corn steep liquor | Flasks, shaking at 220 rpm, pH 7.0, and 37°C for 48 h | 32.14 | Li S. et al. (2022) |
| B. subtillis HB-1 | Glutamate, yeast extract, NaCl, MgSO4, xylose, or corncob fibers hydrolysate | Bioreactor, 500 rpm, 37°C, initial pH 6.5, fed-batch | 28.15 | Zhu et al. (2014) |
| B. subtilis GXG-5 | Glucose, ammonium nitrate | Flasks, shaking at 200 rpm, pH 6.5, 37°C for 34 h, 50°C | 19.5 | Zeng et al. (2017) |
| B. sonorensis 44 | Glycerol, yeast extract, α-ketoglutaric acid | Flasks, shaking at 200 rpm, pH 6.5, 37°C for 72 h, 30°C | 11.84 | |
| B. licheniformis NCIM 2324 | Soybean meal, citric acid, glutamic acid (NH4)2SO4, glycerol, L-glutamine, c-ketoglutaric acid | Flasks, shaking at 200 rpm, and pH 7 ± 0.2 for 96 h at 37 ± 2°C | 98.64 | |
| B. licheniformis CGMCC NO. 23967 | Monosodium glutamate, sugarcane molasses, yeast extract | Flasks, shaking at 200 rpm, pH 6.5, for 72 h, 37°C | 76.85 | |
| B. licheniformis P-104 | Glucose, sodium glutamate, sodium citrate, (NH4)2SO4, MnSO4, MgSO4, K2HPO4 | Bioreactor, 500 rpm, 37°C, pH 7.0, fed batch | 41.6 | Zhao et al. (2013) |
| B. licheniformis NCIM 2324 | Glycerol, l-glutamic acid, citric acid, (NH4)2SO4, K2HPO4, MgSO4, MnSO4 | Flask, shaking at 200 rpm, 37°C, initial pH 6.5 | 35.75 | |
| B. methylotrophicus SK19.001 | Glucose, yeast extracts, MgSO4, K2HPO4, MnSO4 | Flask, shaking at 200 rpm, initial pH 7.2, 37°C | 35.34 | Peng et al. (2015) |
| B. licheniformis TISTR 1010 | Glucose, citric acid, NH4Cl, K2HPO4, MgSO4, CaCl2, MnSO4, NaCl, Tween 80 | Fermenter, 300 rpm, initial pH 7.4, 37°C | 27.5 | Kongklom et al. (2015) |
| B. licheniformis ATCC 9945 | Glutamic acid, glycerol, acid, NH4Cl | Flasks, shaking at 250 rpm at pH 6.5 for 96 h | 23.00 | |
| B. licheniformis A35 | Glucose, MnSO4, ammonium chloride | Flask, slow shaking, initial pH 7.2 at 30°C for 24 h | 8.1 |
Strains, key nutrients of fermentation media, methods, conditions, and yields of γ-PGA.
To obtain high γ-PGA production, the oxygen supply can be maintained by placing culture in the fermenter or adding an oxygen-carrying agent (
5.3 Improved cell membrane permeability for enhanced γ-PGA secretion
Intracellular glutamic acid combined with a membranous mechanism synthesizes extracellular PGA. Therefore, intracellular substrate amount is a crucial factor for γ-PGA biosynthesis, and its higher level could more efficiently produce this polymer (Wu et al., 2008). Cellular stimulation for γ-PGA secretion also alleviates the stress linked to the accumulation of intracellular γ-PGA and substrate leading to enhanced γ-PGA formation. Improved cell membrane permeability increases extracellular substrate consumption and PGA secretion. The addition of glycerol, Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), or Tween 80 addition to the medium enhances extracellular substrates’ uptake and γ-PGA secretion (
5.4 Genetic manipulation
Most native γ-PGA producers are associated with Bacillus species; particularly, B. licheniformis and B. subtilis are widely applied in industrial applications (
Genetic manipulation in the γ-PGA synthesis pathway of native strains is a common technique. Zhang et al. (2015) reported that the individual deletion of gudB (glutamate dehydrogenase) or rocR (transcriptional regulating) genes in B. amyloliquefaciens LL3 efficiently increased γ-PGA yield. The deletion of gudB, fadR, aspB, lysC, pckA, rocG, and proAB genes in B. amyloliquefaciens strain NK-A6 partially blocks the downstream metabolic pathways. B. amyloliquefaciens NK-A7 can be genetically manipulated by inserting a strong PC2up promoter to enhance the NADPH level. B. amyloliquefaciens NK-A11 is genetically manipulated by deleting itu and srf operons. These engineered bacteria have been reported to, respectively, produce 4.84 g/L, 7.53 g/L, and 6.46 g/L γ-PGA, which are higher than original B. amyloliquefaciens LL3 strains (
Heterologous or homologous hosts’ recombinant expression is also an efficient technique for enhancing γ-PGA production. Corynebacterium glutamicum and Escherichia coli-based genetic manipulation is referred to as heterologous expression whereas homologous expression is recombined by Bacillus. The introduction of xylose-induced plasmid pWH1520 with pgsBCA operon into B. subtilis MA41 disrupts the native pgsBCA gene and facilitates the successful expression of γ-PGA synthetase (
5.5 Extraction, recovery, and purification of γ-PGA
One of the major hurdles for scaling up high purity γ-PGA manufacturing is the downstream process. Several downstream procedures are critical for recovering and characterizing γ-PGA produced in the fermentation medium (Nair et al., 2023). Extracellular γ-PGA synthesis in Bacillus species facilitates its recovery and purification. The molecular weight and yield of γ-PGA are key factors, which influence its purification and recovery cost (Markus et al., 1985; Wu et al., 2010). γ-PGA recovery goals mainly include: (i) concentrating the fermentation broth/extract to obtain a stable solid form of microbial product, which is easy to store, handle, transport, and re-dissolve/dilute for specific applications; (ii) purification to mitigate non-polymer solids (salts or cells) and improve its functional performance, taste, color, and odor; (iii) deactivation of contaminating enzymes; and (iv) alteration of chemical properties to amend functional performance, handling properties of solid dried product, dispersion, and solubility rate (Smith and Pace, 1982). PGA is recovered by centrifuging (20,000×g for 15 min) the fermentation broth, which removes cells and simplifies the purification process. The dilution of highly viscose γ-PGA and pH adjustment to 3 helps in reducing viscosity and removing producing strains (
5.5.1 Precipitation by solvents
By changining the materials into an insoluble form, the precipitation process converts the desired products (chemical compounds) from a solution into a solid form or crystals. To perciptate γ-PGA from fermented broth, alcohols such as methanol or ethanol are usually used. Methanol or ethanol (4: 1) is used to precipitate, concentrate, and partially purify γ-PGA. Then, crude PGA is re-dissolved in distilled water (100 to 200 w/v) and centrifuged (5,000 g for 15 min) to discard the remaining solids. Finally, the diluted PGA solution is dialyzed or ultra-filtered to remove low-molecular-weight impurities and salts followed by freeze drying to a stable solid form. However, PGA usage in drug delivery requires further purification to isolate fractions of specific molecular weight (
5.5.2 Precipitation by metal ions
Recently, a precipitation method using different metal ions such as CuSO4, FeCl3, AlCl3, and MnSO4 has been used for γ-PGA precipitation in aqueous solutions as well as from fermented broth. In this method, it was noticed that with the addition of 500 mM CuSO4 to the supernatant of the fermentation broth, up to 95% of γ-PGA was precipitated and recovered. To achieve purified γ-PGA, the formed Cu2+-γ-PGA complex was collected by centrifugation and re-dissolved in Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), followed by dialysis against ultra pure water and lyophilization. The recovery percent of γ-PGA using metal ion-induced precipitation is 85% compared to 82% for precipitation by alcohol. Similarly, the co-precipitation of proteins is just 3% with this strategy compared to 50% using alcohol precipitation, indicating its higher selectivity (Kreyenschulte et al., 2014; Luo et al., 2016; Scheel et al., 2019; Nair et al., 2023). However, toxic metal ions can contaminate the environment and final product (McLean et al., 1990; Luo et al., 2016).
5.5.3 Ultrafiltration
Ultrafiltration is another successful recovery method for γ-PGA since it eliminates the need for a solvent in the downstream process. It can maintain the macromolecules in solutions by using hollow fiber membranes to concentrate high molecular weight γ-PGA. In this method, the fermentation culture containing γ-PGA was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 30 min, and the resulting cell-free liquid was subsequently concentrated by ultracentrifugation. The loss of γ-PGA was insignificant at the 30 to 100 kDa membrane mol. wt. cut-off (MWCO), although the flow rate was modest. Nevertheless, the flow was comparatively greater with a MWCO of 500 kDa, resulting in a little 3% loss in γ-PGA. The concentration of the cell-free supernatant is greatly affected by the pH in ultrafiltration, as a change in the structure of γ-PGA causes a significant loss at lower pH levels (
6 Identification and characterization of γ-PGA
6.1 Determination of molecular weight
γ-PGA molecular characterization is necessary to understand its properties and potential applicability (Sung et al., 2005b). Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) is performed to measure the polydispersity and molecular weight of PGA. Polydispersity and average molecular weight alter with the PGA-producing strain and culturing conditions. GPC employs various mobile phases for calibration in reference to different molecular mass standards (
6.2 Analysis of amino acids
Amino acids containing only glutamic acid represent γ-PGA purity (Shih and Van, 2001). Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) or amino acid analyzers are used for amino acid analysis. Amino acid analysis is carried out by hydrolyzing purified γ-PGA with HCl (6 M) at 100°C for several hours in an airtight tube followed by the evaporation of HCl. Then, water is used to hydrolyze the final product, and amino acid content is analyzed by TLC (Yokoi et al., 1995). TLC is performed on a cellulose plate with different solvent systems (butanol/acetic acid/water (3:1:1, w/w/w) and 96% ethanol/water (63:37, w/w)), and ninhydrin (0.2% in acetone) is sprayed for amino acid identification (Yokoi et al., 1995; Shih et al., 2001). Purified γ-PGA is analyzed by HPLC (high-performance liquid chromatography) according to the methodology of
6.2.1 Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy
Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy is commonly applied for γ-PGA identification. FTIR spectroscopy generates γ-PGA IR spectra containing peaks related to its specific bonds.
6.2.2 Nuclear magnetic resonace (NMR) spectroscopy
The degree of γ-PGA esterification and homogeneity is often determined by 1H- and 13C-NMR spectroscopy (
7 Quantification of γ-PGA content in supernatants of crude fermentation
Impurities in γ-PGA hinder its quantification in most of the current methods. Yu et al. (2021) developed a copper ion-based complex for the accurate and rapid quantification of γ-PGA content and common impurities in fermented broth (proteins, glucose, and glutamic acid). The results revealed that only γ-PGA precipitated with copper ions, which linearly correlated with the precipitated amount. The results had an accuracy and precision of 95.82 and 99.29%, which is significantly higher than other methods (weighing and UV). Therefore, copper ion complex formation is a convenient method to assess contents in crude biological samples.
8 Applications of γ-PGA
γ-PGA unique properties (non-toxicity, biodegradability, water-solubility, edibility, thickness, moistness, non-immunogenicity, and antimicrobial and antioxidant potential) favor its broad range applications in food, cosmetics, medicine, agriculture, and bioremediation fields (Richard and Margaritis, 2001; Sung et al., 2005a;
8.1 Medical and pharmaceutical applications of γ-PGA
γ-PGA has a wide range of applications in pharmaceutical manufacturing including delivery systems, tissue engineering, gene carriers, and therapeutic and immunological effects. It can significantly reduce drug toxicity and improve drug efficiency in combination with other matters (Luo et al., 2016; Zhan et al., 2018;
8.1.1 γ-PGA applications as drug carrier and anticancer agent
The biodegradability and biocompatibility of γ-PGA favor its application as a drug delivery carrier. The side chains of γ-PGA contain carboxyl groups for the conjugation of chemotherapeutic agents, which facilitate the drug solubility and administration. The PGA-drug conjugate reaches the tumor sites and gradually releases the drug with its biodegradation. Glutamic acid, a breakdown product of PGA, can enter the normal cellular metabolism (Singer, 2005). Several conjugants of PGA and anticancer agents have been studied. Li et al. (1998) devised a PGA–paclitaxel conjugate to enhance the antitumour efficacy, stability, and water solubility of paclitaxel. The conjugate exhibited significantly higher antitumour activity against ovarian and breast cancers in human tumor xenografts and murine models as compared to regular paclitaxel treatment. Tumor cell uptake of the PGA–paclitaxel conjugate was noted to be five-fold higher than paclitaxel. The study further elaborated that the PGA–paclitaxel conjugate did not support tubulin polymerization and growth and viability of the Taxol-dependent CHO cell line. Singer (2005) prepared another γ-PGA conjugate with paclitaxel known as paclitaxel poliglumex. It presented more advantages than standard paclitaxel administration such as water solubility, better stability in plasma to mitigate systemic exposure to free paclitaxel, smaller distribution volume, longer elimination and distribution phases, and improved selectivity through higher retention and accumulation in tumor tissue. During a study, oral administration of high molecular mass (26,106 Da) γ-PGA led to the induction of (NK)-cell-mediated antitumour immunity in mice suffering from MHC (major histocompatibility complex) class I-deficient tumours. The antitumour immunity mechanism was found to be associated with γ-PGA-based activation of NK cells rather than direct cytotoxicity. The results revealed comparable antitumour effects of γ-PGA (26,106 Da) against B16 tumours in mice (C57BL/6) with b-glucan (curdlan) that exerts immunomodulating antitumour effects by activating NK cells. These findings advocate γ-PGA application in the immunotherapy of cancers (Kim et al., 2007). Based on an in vitro study, Shin et al. (2015) suggest that γ-PGA induces apoptosis in TPA-induced HT-29 human colorectal cancer cells and enhances apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells. Zhang et al. (2018) highlighted that the PGA–Asp–maleimide–cisplatin–peptide complex (PAMCP) reduced the side effects of cis-Dichlorodiamineplatinum (CDDP) and exhibited stronger anti-tumor effects. Therefore, PAMCP presented the potential to be a safe and effective anticancer pharmaceutical formulation for future clinical applications. Tsao et al. (2011) designed a polyelectrolyte complex (PEC) for wound dressing, which contained chitosan (cationic polyelectrolyte) and γ-PGA (anionic polyelectrolyte). These chitosan/γ-PGA PECs provided ample moisture content where γ-PGA more efficiently reduced dehydration risk than regular chitosan. Animal model-based investigations revealed that chitosan/γ-PGA PEC-treated wounds healed more rapidly than untreated wounds. Chitosan/γ-PGA PECs efficiently suppressed inflammatory cells in comparison to regular chitosan, which confirmed the anti-inflammatory potential of γ-PGA. Chitosan/γ-PGA PEC-treated wounds displayed more development of keratin than controls and regular chitosan-treated wounds. After healing, the chitosan/γ-PGA PECs were easily removed from the wound surface and did not damage the regenerated tissues. Thus, chitosan/γ-PGA PECs proved an effective wound dressing material. Ryu et al. (2011) developed γ-PGA and L-phenylalanine nanoparticles (γ-PGA-Phe NPs) and used them for the treatment of retinal diseases in in vivo and in vitro investigations. γ-PGA-Phe NPs and Texas red-labelled ovalbumin were applied in the eye to study the NPs’ dynamics. Similarly, dexamethasone-containing NPs were administered for the in vivo immunosuppressive treatment of microglia and macrophages against various pathological retina disorders. γ-PGA-Phe NPs effectively regulated inflammatory phagocytic cells in the retina under pathological conditions. The results also demonstrated γ-PGA-Phe NPs’ potential as long-term drug delivery carriers in the damaged retina. γ-PGA-Phe NPs proved more advantageous than triamcinolone acetate steroid, which is commonly administered for the treatment of retinal disorders. γ-PGA-Phe NPs can help in avoiding steroid-induced post-capsular cataract formation and glaucoma. Moreover, direct steroid application is toxic to retinal neurons whereas γ-PGA-Phe NPs specifically target microglia and macrophages and thus minimize steroid-associated complications (Ryu et al., 2011).
8.1.2 γ-PGA applications in tissue engineering
Polymer-based hydrogels have numerous applications in medicine (e.g., drug delivery, tissue engineering, wound dressings), cosmetics, and various industrial uses (e.g., contact lenses, hygiene products) (Okay, 2010;
Chitosan is the most suitable polymer in tissue engineering among biodegradable polymers. However, the mechanical strength of its scaffolds must be improved for better utility in tissue engineering.
8.1.3 γ-PGA applications as antimicrobial agent
The development of novel bactericidal materials requires continuous efforts in medicine, healthcare, and food packaging sectors. The use of hydrogels based on γ-PGA is gaining populariy and several approaches have been proposed such as the bonding of the carboxyl group to nanoparticles and the development of ionic hydrogels based on gelatin and γ-PGA. Tajima and Sukigara investigated the mechanical and bactericidal properties of non-woven γ-PGA cross linked with oxazoline (Tajima and Sukigara, 2012; Wang et al., 2012;
8.1.4 γ-PGA applications as biomedical adhesives and glues
Biological adhesives are used for hemostasis, tissue adhesion, and sealing of fluid and air leaks during surgery. Air leakage is a major complication of chest and lung surgeries, which is traditionally stopped by stapling or sewing (Richard and Margaritis, 2003). The use of fibrin, a biological adhesive, has been reported for this purpose. Fibrinogen, thrombin, and fibrin are retrieved from human blood transfusion and are generally highly biocompatible, but they can also serve as a source of viral infection. Fibrin, a common surgical adhesive, has poor tissue adhesion. In this regard, chemical crosslinking of γ-PGA and gelatin has demonstrated promising surgical adhesion and hemostatic properties that could be a better alternative to fibrin glue. Animal studies have revealed slow degradation of these hydrogels inside the body without severe inflammatory response. Otani et al. (1999) reported rapid solidification of PGA and gelatin-based WSC-crosslinked hydrogel as compared to fibrin glue, and it sealed the lung air leak more effectively than the fibrin glue. A mixed hydrogel of γ-PGA and gelatin was prepared using a crosslinker (1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-(ethylcarbodiimide) hydrochloride (EDC)), which exhibited shorter gelation time and higher bonding strength. A PGA and porcine collagen-based biological adhesive was also found to be better than fibrin in sealing lung air leakage.
8.2 γ-PGA applications in cosmetics
Proper moisturization and nutrition are vital to the health and beauty of human skin and hair. Over-dryness caused by low humidity is often detrimental to the skin and hair conditions. In winter, low temperature and dry air especially cause the dryness of the skin and hair, deteriorating the skin health conditions and even hardening or damaging the epidermis and electrifying the hair. To prevent the dryness of the skin, hair, and nail, cosmetic products such as skin essence, hand and body lotions, bath soaps, skin and body creams, hair gels, hair shampoos and mousse, and many other personal care products often contain certain moisturizers to provide the necessary moisturizing conditions to the skin and hair, and also to protect and beautify the skin and hair (
Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a natural polymer and one of the components of polysaccharide extracellular matrix (ECM). Although pure HA is rigid and degrades quickly, it has been widely utilized in various ocular surgeries, can hasten wound healing, and has vast prospects in the cosmetics industry. Notably, PGA’s biodegradability, high water-retaining capacity, and ability to create amide bonds make it a valuable component for polyamide-PGA, outperforming hyaluronic acid in terms of improved moisturizing properties (Li et al., 2014;
8.3 γ-PGA applications in food industries
Beneficial nutration effects of γ-PGA have been previously reported. In mice, high-fat diets containing 3% γ-PGA significantly increased the serum HDL-cholesterol and significantly decreased the serum triglycerides (TG) compared to levels observed in the mice fed a high-fat control diet. However, the inhibition of intestinal high-fat absorption is one of mechanisms that improved the lipid metabolism in the mice fed with high-fat diet (Lee et al., 2013). Park et al. (2011) studied the effect of diets containing high molecular weight γ-PGA on adiposity and lipid metabolism in rats, suggesting that dietary supplementation with high molecular weight γ-PGA may act as a hypocholesterolemic agent. γ-PGA can serve as a non-toxic, edible, antimicrobial, and strong water-holding antioxidant in food industries. Thus, it has the potential to replace existing functional food supplements. γ-PGA role as a stabilizer and texture enhancer could promote the quality of wheat gluten (WG), starch, and their products (Xie et al., 2020). γ-PGA can stabilize fermented foods (yogurts) by maintaining microorganism viability, texture, food flavor, and aroma during production, transportation, and selling (Yu et al., 2018). It has been shown that γ-PGA can act as a bitterness-masking agent to curb the bitter taste of quinine, amino acids, minerals, peptides, and caffeine. It is also used as a thickener in fruit juice beverages (
8.4 γ-PGA applications as a soil conditioner in agriculture
γ-PGA has promising agricultural uses as a new environmentally benign fertilizer synergist to boost nutrient uptake by plants. However, its agricultural application is hampered by the low yield and high cost of the production compared to conventional materials, because the production of γ-PGA by fermentation often requires glutamate and other high-cost components as substrates. However, some low-cost feedstocks are urgently required to overcome the economic and long-term barriers to biotechnologically producing γ-PGA (
8.5 γ-PGA applications in wastewater treatment
The biodegradable and non-toxic nature of γ-PGA presents it as an eco-friendly wastewater treatment option. γ-PGA (MW ~ 5.8–6.2 × 106 Da) could perform better than most conventional wastewater flocculants in treatment plants, which operate downstream of food fermentation processing units (
9 Conclusions and future perspectives
Natural biopolymers are becoming more and more in demand worldwide and are poised to take the place of traditional petro-based polymers. γ-PGA is an amino acid biopolymer that has recently attracted attention due to its biocompatibility, non-immunogenicity, biodegradability, and non-toxic properties. Due to its unique properties, it has been applied in various applications in healthcare, pharmaceuticals, water treatment, foods, and other important applications. However, it is expected that in the next five years, more research will be focused on the thorough evaluation of its biodistrubution, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics before using PGA-based materials in clinical trials for cancer therapy. γ-PGA is not susceptible to proteases, so it could provide better sustained delivery of conjugated drugs in the body. This review briefly covers γ-PGA-producing microorganisms, biosynthesis mechanism, limitations of γ-PGA production and the strategies for commercialization. Also, included the factors affecting γ-PGA production, downstream processing, characterization and identification approach and applications of γ-PGA. However, the main economic problem that prevents the commercialization of biopolymers is the price when compared to conventional counterparts. γ-PGA is one of the most expensive biopolymers with diverse applications. Even though there are potent γ-PGA-producing strains available, the cost of production and recovery are still high. Therefore, the screening for potential γ-PGA producer strains using a low-cost fermentation medium is the most upcoming need to reduce the overall production cost. To achieve this, more research exploring various types of agricultural and food industries wastes containing organic acids and amino acids that could be used directly as the fermentation substrate without supplementation with additional nutrients is needed. Also, whey permeates, a by-product of cheese processing in the dairy industry, also has attracted considerable attention due to its high nutritional content and functional properties. In addition, finding solutions for cost-effective γ-PGA production may also be possible through statistical analysis of large-scale γ-PGA production. γ-PGA has found extensive use in the medical field, particularly in the realm of continuous medication administration. One of the most promising attractive and perspective strategies for a large scale production is manipulating transgenic plants such sugar beat (Beta vulgaris) and cassava (Manihot esculenta) for producing polyglutamic acid by introducing a nucleic acid encoding a polyglutamic acid synthase A (pgsA), a nucleic acid encoding a polyglutamic acid synthase B (pgsB), and a nucleic acid encoding a polyglutamic acid synthase C (pgsC) into the plant. As a result, production costs will be significantly reduced for further commercialization. Finally, it will be expected that this attractive biopolymer could facilitate the development of more useful multifunctional biomaterials.
Statements
Author contributions
KE: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – original draft. FA: Visualization, Writing – original draft. LN: Data curation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. HA: Writing – review & editing, Data curation.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AboulmagdE.Oppermann-SanioF. B.SteinbüchelA. (2000). Molecular characterization of the cyanophycin synthetase from Synechocystis sp. strain PCC6308. Arch. Microbiol.174, 297–306. doi: 10.1007/s002030000206
2
AjayeobaT. A.DulaS.IjabadeniyiO. A. (2019). Properties of poly-γ-glutamic acid producing-bacillus species isolated from Ogi liquor and lemon-Ogi liquor. Front. Microbiol.10:771. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00771
3
AkagiT.MatsusakiM.AkashiM. (2010). “Pharmaceutical and medical applications of poly-gamma-glutamic acid” in Amino-acid homopolymers occurring in nature, Vol. 15. ed. HamanoY. (Berlin: Springer), 119–153.
4
AshiuchiM. (2010). “Occurrence and biosynthetic mechanism of poly-gamma-glutamic acid” in Amino-acid homopolymers occurring in nature, vol. 15. ed. HamanoY. (Berlin: Springer), 77–93.
5
AshiuchiM. (2013). Biochemical engineering of PGA. Microb. Biotechnol.6, 664–674. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12072
6
AshiuchiM.FukushimaK.OyaH.HiraokiT.ShibataniS.OkaN.et al. (2013). Development of antimicrobial thermoplastic material from archaeal poly-γ-L-glutamate and its nanofabrication. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces5, 1619–1624. doi: 10.1021/am3032025
7
AshiuchiM.KameiT.BaekD. H.ShinS. Y.SungM. H.SodaK.et al. (2001). Isolation of Bacillus subtilis (chungkookjang), a poly-γ-glutamate producer with high genetic competence. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.57, 764–769. doi: 10.1007/s00253-001-0848-9
8
AshiuchiM.KameiT.MisonoH. (2003a). Poly-γ-glutamate synthetase of Bacillus subtilis. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym.23, 101–106. doi: 10.1016/S1381-1177(03)00076-6
9
AshiuchiM.KuwanaE.KomatsuK.SodaK.MisonoH. (2003b). Differences in effects on DNA gyrase activity between two glutamate racemases of Bacillus subtilis, the poly-γ-glutamate synthesis-linking Glr enzyme and the YrpC (MurI) isozyme. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.223, 221–225. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00381-1
10
AshiuchiM.MisonoH. (2002). Biochemistry and molecular genetics of poly-γ-glutamate synthesis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.59, 9–14. doi: 10.1007/s00253-002-0984-x
11
AshiuchiM.MisonoH. (2005). “Poly-c-glutamic acid” in Biopolymers for medical and pharmaceutical applications, vol. 1. eds. SteinbuchelA.MarchessaultR. H. (Weinheim: Wiley–VCH), 619–634.
12
AshiuchiM.ShimanouchiK.HoriuchiT.KameiT.MisonoH. (2006). Genetically engineered poly-γ-glutamate producer from Bacillus subtilis ISW1214. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.70, 1794–1797. doi: 10.1271/bbb.60082
13
AshiuchiM.ShimanouchiK.NakamuraH.KameiT.SodaK.ParkC.et al. (2004). Enzymatic synthesis of high-molecular-mass poly-γ-glutamate and regulation of its stereochemistry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.70, 4249–4255. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.7.4249-4255.2004
14
AshiuchiM.TaniK.SodaK.MisonoH. (1998). Properties of glutamate racemase from Bacillus subtilis IFO 3336 producing poly-cglutamate. J. Biochem.123, 1156–1163.
15
AzarhavaH.BajestaniM. I.JafariA.VakilchapF.MousaviS. M. (2020). Production and physicochemical characterization of bacterial poly gamma-(glutamic acid) to investigate its performance on enhanced oil recovery. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.147, 1204–1212. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.10.090
16
BajajI. B.LeleS. S.SinghalR. S. (2008). Enhanced production of poly (−glutamic acid) from Bacillus licheniformis NCIM 2324 in solid state fermentation. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol.35, 1581–1586. doi: 10.1007/s10295-008-0401-2
17
BajajI. B.LeleS. S.SinghalR. S. (2009). A statistical approach to optimization of fermentative production of poly (γ-glutamic acid) from Bacillus licheniformis NCIM 2324. Bioresour. Technol.100, 826–832. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.06.047
18
BajajB.SinghalR. S. (2009). Enhanced production of poly (γ-glutamic acid) from Bacillus licheniformis NCIM 2324 by using metabolic precursors. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.159, 133–141. doi: 10.1007/s12010-008-8427-5
19
BajajI. B.SinghalR. S. (2011a). Flocculation properties of poly (γ-glutamic acid) produced from Bacillus subtilis isolate. Food Bioprocess Technol.4, 745–752. doi: 10.1007/s11947-009-0186-y
20
BajajI.SinghalR. (2011b). Poly (glutamic acid)–an emerging biopolymer of commercial interest. Bioresour. Technol.102, 5551–5561. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.02.047
21
BajestaniM.MousaviS. M.MousaviS. B.JafariA.ShojaosadatiS. A. (2018). Purification of extra cellular poly-γ-glutamic acid as an antibacterial agent using anion exchange chromatography. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.113, 142–149. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.02.082
22
Ben-ZurN.GoldmanD. M. (2007). γ-Poly glutamic acid: a novel peptide for skin care. Cosmet. Toiletries122
23
BhatA. R.IrorereV. U.BartlettT.HillD.KediaG.MorrisM. R.et al. (2013). Bacillus subtilis natto: a non-toxic source of poly-γ-glutamic acid that could be used as a cryoprotectant for probiotic bacteria. AMB Express3, 1–9. doi: 10.1186/2191-0855-3-36
24
BhuniaB.MukhopadhyD.GoswamiS.MandalT.DeyA. (2012). Improved production, characterization and flocculation properties of poly (γ)-glutamic acid produced from Bacillus subtilis. J. Biochem. Technol.3, 389–394.
25
BianS.HeM.SuiJ.CaiH.SunY.LiangJ.et al. (2016). The self-crosslinking smart hyaluronic acid hydrogels as injectable three-dimensional scaffolds for cells culture. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces140, 392–402. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.01.008
26
BirrerG. A.CromwickA. M.GrossR. A. (1994). γ-Poly (glutamic acid) formation by Bacillus licheniformis 9945a: physiological and biochemical studies. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.16, 265–275. doi: 10.1016/0141-8130(94)90032-9
27
BodnárM.KjøniksenA. L.MolnárR. M.HartmannJ. F.DarócziL.NyströmB.et al. (2008). Nanoparticles formed by complexation of poly-gamma-glutamic acid with lead ions. J. Hazard. Mater.153, 1185–1192. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.080
28
BorbélyM.NagasakiY.BorbélyJ.FanK.BhogleA.SevoianM. (1994). Biosynthesis and chemical modification of poly (γ-glutamic acid). Polym. Bull.32, 127–132. doi: 10.1007/BF00306378
29
BovarnickM. (1942). The formation of extracellular d (−)-glutamic acid polypeptide by Bacillus subtilis. J. Biol. Chem.145, 415–424. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)51281-3
30
BuescherJ. M.MargaritisA. (2007). Microbial biosynthesis of polyglutamic acid biopolymer and applications in the biopharmaceutical, biomedical and food industries. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol.27, 1–19. doi: 10.1080/07388550601166458
31
CachatE.BarkerM.ReadT. D.PriestF. G. (2008). A Bacillus thuringiensis strain producing a polyglutamate capsule resembling that of Bacillus anthracis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.285, 220–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01231.x
32
CaiM.HanY.ZhengX.XueB.ZhangX.MahmutZ.et al. (2023). Synthesis of poly-γ-glutamic acid and its application in biomedical materials. Materials17, 1–25. doi: 10.3390/ma17010015
33
CandelaT.FouetA. (2006). Poly-gamma-glutamate in bacteria. Mol. Microbiol.60, 1091–1098. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05179.x
34
CandelaT.MoyaM.HaustantM.FouetA. (2009). Fusobacterium nucleatum, the first gram-negative bacterium demonstrated to produce polyglutamate. Can. J. Microbiol.55, 627–632. doi: 10.1139/W09-003
35
CaoM.FengJ.SirisansaneeyakulS.SongC.ChistiY. (2018). Genetic and metabolic engineering for microbial production of poly-γ-glutamic acid. Biotechnol. Adv.36, 1424–1433. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.05.006
36
CaoM.GengW.LiuL.SongC.XieH.GuoW.et al. (2011). Glutamic acid independent production of poly-γ-glutamic acid by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens LL3 and cloning of pgsBCA genes. Bioresour. Technol.102, 4251–4257. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.065
37
CaoM.GengW.ZhangW.SunJ.WangS.FengJ.et al. (2013). Engineering of recombinant Escherichia coli cells co-expressing poly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA) synthetase and glutamate racemase for differential yielding of γ-PGA. Microb. Biotechnol.6, 675–684. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12075
38
CaoM.SongC.JinY.LiuL.LiuJ.XieH.et al. (2010). Synthesis of poly (γ-glutamic acid) and heterologous expression of pgsBCA genes. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym.67, 111–116. doi: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2010.07.014
39
ChangJ.ZhongZ.HongX. U.ZhongY. A. O.RizhiC. H. E. N. (2013). Fabrication of poly (γ-glutamic acid)-coated Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles and their application in heavy metal removal. Chin. J. Chem. Eng.21, 1244–1250. doi: 10.1016/S1004-9541(13)60629-1
40
ChenX.ChenS.SunM.YuZ. (2005). High yield of poly-γ-glutamic acid from Bacillus subtilis by solid-state fermentation using swine manure as the basis of a solid substrate. Bioresour. Technol.96, 1872–1879. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.01.033
41
ChenZ.YaoJ.ZhaoJ.WangS. (2023). Injectable wound dressing based on carboxymethyl chitosan triple-network hydrogel for effective wound antibacterial and hemostasis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.225, 1235–1245. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.11.184
42
ChengC.AsadaY.AidaT. (1989). Production of γ-polyglutamic acid by Bacillus licheniformis A35 under denitrifying conditions. Agric. Biol. Chem.53, 2369–2375. doi: 10.1080/00021369.1989.10869686
43
CromwickA. M.BirrerG. A.GrossR. A. (1996). Effects of pH and aeration on γ-poly (glutamic acid) formation by Bacillus licheniformis in controlled batch fermentor cultures. Biotechnol. Bioeng.50, 222–227. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19960420)50:2<222::AID-BIT10>3.0.CO;2-P
44
CsikósZ.FazekasE.RózsaD.BorbélyJ.KerekesK. (2018). Crosslinked poly-γ-glutamic acid based nanosystem for drug delivery. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol.48, 478–489. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2018.10.026
45
Da SilvaS. B.CantarelliV. V.AyubM. A. (2014). Production and optimization of poly-γ-glutamic acid by Bacillus subtilis BL53 isolated from the Amazonian environment. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng.37, 469–479. doi: 10.1007/s00449-013-1016-1
46
DoJ. H.ChangH. N.SnYL. (2001). Efficient recovery of γ-poly (glutamic acid) from highly viscous culture broth. Biotechnol. Bioeng.76, 219–223. doi: 10.1002/bit.1186
47
DoT. H.SuzukiY.AbeN.KanekoJ.ItohY.KimuraK. (2011). Mutations suppressing the loss of DegQ function in Bacillus subtilis (natto) poly-γ-glutamate synthesis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.77, 8249–8258. doi: 10.1128/AEM.05827-11
48
DuG.YangG.QuY.ChenJ.LunS. (2005). Effects of glycerol on the production of poly (γ-glutamic acid) by Bacillus licheniformis. Process Biochem.40, 2143–2147. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2004.08.005
49
EddeB.RossierJ.Le CaerJ. P.DesbruyèresE.GrosF.DenouletP. (1990). Posttranslational glutamylation of α-tubulin. Science247, 83–85. doi: 10.1126/science.1967194
50
EzzellJ. W.AbshireT. G.PanchalR.ChabotD.BavariS.LeffelE. K.et al. (2009). Association of Bacillus anthracis capsule with lethal toxin during experimental infection. Infect. Immun.77, 749–755. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00764-08
51
FengJ.GuY.QuanY.CaoM.GaoW.ZhangW.et al. (2015). Improved poly-γ-glutamic acid production in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens by modular pathway engineering. Metab. Eng.32, 106–115. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2015.09.011
52
FengJ.GuY.SunY.HanL.YangC.ZhangW.et al. (2014). Metabolic engineering of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens for poly-gamma-glutamic acid (γ-PGA) overproduction. Microb. Biotechnol.7, 446–455. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12136
53
FengJ.QuanY.GuY.LiuF.HuangX.ShenH.et al. (2017). Enhancing poly-γ-glutamic acid production in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens by introducing the glutamate synthesis features from Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb. Cell Factories16, 1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12934-017-0704-y
54
GaoW.HeY.ZhangF.ZhaoF.HuangC.ZhangY.et al. (2019). Metabolic engineering of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens LL 3 for enhanced poly-γ-glutamic acid synthesis. Microb. Biotechnol.12, 932–945. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13446
55
GaoC.ItoS.ObataA.MizunoT.JonesJ. R.KasugaT. (2016). Fabrication and in vitro characterization of electrospun poly (γ-glutamic acid)-silica hybrid scaffolds for bone regeneration. Polymer91, 106–117. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.03.056
56
GaoW.ZhangZ.FengJ.DangY.QuanY.GuY.et al. (2016). Effects of MreB paralogs on poly-γ-glutamic acid synthesis and cell morphology in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.363:fnw187. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnw187
57
GarciaJ. P. D.HsiehM. F.DomaB. T.Jr.PerueloD. C.ChenI. H.LeeH. M. (2014). Synthesis of gelatin-γ-polyglutamic acid-based hydrogel for the in vitro controlled release of epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) from Camellia sinensis. Polymers6, 39–58. doi: 10.3390/polym6010039
58
GotoA.KuniokaM. (1992). Biosynthesis and hydrolysis of poly (γ-glutamic acid) from Bacillus subtilis IF03335. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.56, 1031–1035. doi: 10.1271/bbb.56.1031
59
GracielaP. C.FranciscoC.JordiJ. B.SebastianM. G. (2000). Biosynthesis and ultrasonic degradation of bacterial poly(c-glutamic acid). Biotechnol. Bioeng.63, 110–115. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19990405)63:1<110::AID-BIT11>3.0.CO;2-T
60
GrossC. (1998). “Bacterial y-Poly(glutamic acid)” in Biopolymers from Renewahle Resources. ed. KaplanD. L., (New York: Springer-Verlag), 195–219.
61
GunawanP.GuanC.SongX.ZhangQ.LeongS. S. J.TangC.et al. (2011). Hollow fiber membrane decorated with ag/MWNTs: toward effective water disinfection and biofouling control. ACS Nano5, 10033–10040. doi: 10.1021/nn2038725
62
GuoL.LuL.WangH.ZhangX.WangG.ZhaoT.et al. (2023). Effects of Fe2+ addition to sugarcane molasses on poly-γ-glutamic acid production in Bacillus licheniformis CGMCC NO. 23967. Microb. Cell Factories22:37. doi: 10.1186/s12934-023-02042-0
63
GuptaR.BegQ.KhanS.ChauhanB. (2002). An overview on fermentation, downstream processing and properties of microbial alkaline proteases. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.60, 381–395. doi: 10.1007/s00253-002-1142-1
64
HezayenF. F.RehmB. H. A.EberhardtR.SteinbücheA. (2000). Polymer production by two newly isolated extremely halophilic archaea: application of a novel corrosion-resistant bioreactor. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.54, 319–325. doi: 10.1007/s002530000394
65
HezayenF. F.RehmB. H.TindallB. J.SteinbüchelA. (2001). Transfer of Natrialba asiatica B1T to Natrialba taiwanensis sp. nov. and description of Natrialba aegyptiaca sp. nov., a novel extremely halophilic, aerobic, non-pigmented member of the Archaea from Egypt that produces extracellular poly (glutamic acid). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.51, 1133–1142. doi: 10.1099/00207713-51-3-1133
66
HezayenF. F.TindallB. J.SteinbüchelA.RehmB. H. A. (2002). Characterization of a novel halophilic archaeon, Halobiforma haloterrestris gen. Nov., sp. nov., and transfer of Natronobacterium nitratireducens to Halobiforma nitratireducens comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.52, 2271–2280. doi: 10.1099/00207713-52-6-2271
67
HirasawaT.ShimizuH. (2016). Recent advances in amino acid production by microbial cells. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.42, 133–146. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.04.017
68
HoG. H.HoT. I.HsiehK. H.SuY. C.LinP. Y.YangJ.et al. (2006). γ-Polyglutamic acid produced by Bacillus Subtilis (Natto): structural characteristics, chemical properties and biological functionalities. J. Chin. Chem. Soc.53, 1363–1384. doi: 10.1002/jccs.200600182
69
HoG. H.YangJ. T.YangT. H. T. (2005). Gamma polyglutamic acid (gamma-PGA, h form), gamma-polyglutamate hydrogels for use as super moisturizers in cosmetic and personal care products.
70
HsiehC. Y.TsaiS. P.WangD. M.ChangY. N.HsiehH. J. (2005). Preparation of γ-PGA/chitosan composite tissue engineering matrices. Biomaterials26, 5617–5623. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.012
71
HuT. C.KorczyńskaJ.SmithD. K.BrzozowskiA. M. (2008). High-molecular-weight polymers for protein crystallization: poly-γ-glutamic acid-based precipitants. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr.64, 957–963. doi: 10.1107/S0907444908021616
72
HuangJ.DuY.XuG.ZhangH.ZhuF.HuangL.et al. (2011). High yield and cost-effective production of poly (γ-glutamic acid) with Bacillus subtilis. Eng. Life Sci.11, 291–297. doi: 10.1002/elsc.201000133
73
HuangB.QinP.XuZ.ZhuR.MengY. (2011). Effects of CaCl2 on viscosity of culture broth, and on activities of enzymes around the 2-oxoglutarate branch, in Bacillus subtilis CGMCC 2108 producing poly-(γ-glutamic acid). Bioresour. Technol.102, 3595–3598. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.073
74
InbarajB. S.ChiuC. P.HoG. H.YangJ.ChenB. H. (2006). Removal of cationic dyes from aqueous solution using an anionic poly-γ-glutamic acid-based adsorbent. J. Hazard. Mater.137, 226–234. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.01.057
75
InbarajB. S.KaoT. H.TsaiT. Y.ChiuC. P.KumarR.ChenB. H. (2011). The synthesis and characterization of poly(c-glutamic acid)-coated magnetite nanoparticles and their effects on antibacterial activity and cytotoxicity. Nanotechnology22:075101. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/22/7/075101
76
IvannovicsG.BrucknerV. (1937). The chemistry of the capsule substance of B. anthracis and its identity with that of B. mesentericus.90, 304–318.
77
JangW. J.ChoiS. Y.LeeJ. M.LeeG. H.HasanM. T.KongI. S. (2019). Viability of Lactobacillus plantarum encapsulated with poly-γ-glutamic acid produced by Bacillus sp. SJ-10 during freeze-drying and in an in vitro gastrointestinal model. LWT112:108222. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.05.120
78
JeongJ. H.KimJ. N.WeeY. J.RyuH. W. (2010). The statistically optimized production of poly (γ-glutamic acid) by batch fermentation of a newly isolated Bacillus subtilis RKY3. Bioresour. Technol.101, 4533–4539. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.080
79
JiaZ.LvX.HouY.WangK.RenF.XuD.et al. (2021). Mussel-inspired nanozyme catalyzed conductive and self-setting hydrogel for adhesive and antibacterial bioelectronics. Bioact. Mater.6, 2676–2687. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.01.033
80
JianX.ShouwenC.ZiniuY. (2005). Optimization of process parameters for poly γ-glutamate production under solid state fermentation from Bacillus subtilis CCTCC202048. Process Biochem.40, 3075–3081. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2005.03.011
81
JiangF.QiG.JiZ.ZhangS.LiuJ.MaX.et al. (2011). Expression of glr gene encoding glutamate racemase in Bacillus licheniformis WX-02 and its regulatory effects on synthesis of poly-γ-glutamic acid. Biotechnol. Lett.33, 1837–1840. doi: 10.1007/s10529-011-0631-7
82
JiangH.ShangL.YoonS. H.LeeS. Y.YuZ. (2006). Optimal production of poly-γ-glutamic acid by metabolically engineered Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Lett.28, 1241–1246. doi: 10.1007/s10529-006-9080-0
83
JoseA. A.AnusreeG.PandeyA.BinodP. (2018). Production optimization of poly-γ-glutamic acid by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens under solid-state fermentation using soy hull as substrate. Available at: https://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/44827
84
JuW. T.SongY. S.JungW. J.ParkR. D. (2014). Enhanced production of poly-γ-glutamic acid by a newly-isolated Bacillus subtilis. Biotechnol. Lett.36, 2319–2324. doi: 10.1007/s10529-014-1613-3
85
KandlerO.KönigH.WiegelJ.ClausD. (1983). Occurrence of poly-γ-D-glutamic acid and poly-α-L-glutamine in the genera Xanthobacter, Flexithrix, Sporosarcina and Planococcus. Syst. Appl. Microbiol.4, 34–41. doi: 10.1016/S0723-2020(83)80032-0
86
KasbiyanH.YousefzadeO.SimiandE.SaperasN.Del ValleL. J.PuiggalíJ. (2022). Antibacterial hydrogels derived from poly (γ-glutamic acid) nanofibers. Gels8:120. doi: 10.3390/gels8020120
87
KimT. W.LeeT. Y.BaeH. C.HahmJ. H.KimY. H.ParkC.et al. (2007). Oral administration of high molecular mass poly-c-glutamate induces NK cell-mediated antitumor immunity. J. Immunol.179, 775–780. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.2.775
88
KimuraK.TranL. S. P.UchidaI.ItohY. (2004). Characterization of Bacillus subtilis γ-glutamyltransferase and its involvement in the degradation of capsule poly-γ-glutamate. Microbiology150, 4115–4123. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.27467-0
89
KingE. C.BlackerA. J.BuggT. D. (2000). Enzymatic breakdown of poly-γ-D-glutamic acid in Bacillus licheniformis: identification of a polyglutamyl γ-hydrolase enzyme. Biomacromolecules1, 75–83. doi: 10.1021/bm990001n
90
KoY. H.GrossR. A. (1998). Effects of glucose and glycerol on γ-poly (glutamic acid) formation by Bacillus licheniformis ATCC 9945a. Biotechnol. Bioeng.57, 430–437. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19980220)57:4<430::AID-BIT6>3.0.CO;2-N
91
KocianovaS.VuongC.YaoY.VoyichJ. M.FischerE. R.DeLeoF. R.et al. (2005). Key role of poly-γ-DL-glutamic acid in immune evasion and virulence of Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Clin. Invest.115, 688–694. doi: 10.1172/JCI23523
92
KongklomN.LuoH.ShiZ.PechyenC.ChistiY.SirisansaneeyakulS. (2015). Production of poly-γ-glutamic acid by glutamic acid-independent Bacillus licheniformis TISTR 1010 using different feeding strategies. Biochem. Eng. J.100, 67–75. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2015.04.007
93
KreyenschulteD.KrullR.MargaritisA. (2014). Recent advances in microbial biopolymer production and purification. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol.34, 1–15. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2012.743501
94
KubotaH.MatsunobuT.UotaniK.TakebeH.SatohA.TanakaT.et al. (1993). Production of poly (γ-glutamic acid) by Bacillus subtilis F-2-01. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.57, 1212–1213. doi: 10.1271/bbb.57.1212
95
KumarR.PalP. (2015). Fermentative production of poly (γ-glutamic acid) from renewable carbon source and downstream purification through a continuous membrane-integrated hybrid process. Bioresour. Technol.177, 141–148. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.078
96
KuniokaM. (1995). Biosynthesis of poly (γ-glutamic acid) from l-glutamine, citric acid and ammonium sulfate in Bacillus subtilis IFO3335. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.44, 501–506. doi: 10.1007/BF00169951
97
KuniokaM.GotoA. (1994). Biosynthesis of poly (γ-glutamic acid) from L-glutamic acid, citric acid, and ammonium sulfate in Bacillus subtilis IFO3335. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.40, 867–872. doi: 10.1007/BF00173990
98
LeeN. R.GoT. H.LeeS. M.JeongS. Y.ParkG. T.HongC. O.et al. (2014). In vitro evaluation of new functional properties of poly-γ-glutamic acid produced by Bacillus subtilis D7. Saudi J. Biol. Sci.21, 153–158. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2013.09.004
99
LeeJ. M.JangW. J.ParkS. H.KongI. S. (2020). Antioxidant and gastrointestinal cytoprotective effect of edible polypeptide poly-γ-glutamic acid. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.153, 616–624. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.050
100
LeeW.KimM.LeeS. H.JungH. G.OhJ. W. (2018). Prophylactic efficacy of orally administered Bacillus poly-γ-glutamic acid, a non-LPS TLR4 ligand, against norovirus infection in mice. Sci. Rep.8:8667. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26935-y
101
LeeE. H.SonW. C.LeeS. E.KimB. H. (2013). Anti-obesity effects of poly-gamma-glutamic acid with or without Isoflavones on high-fat diet induced obese mice. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.77, 1694–1702. doi: 10.1271/bbb.130253
102
LeonardC. G.HousewrightR. D.ThorneC. B. (1958). Effects of some metallic ions on glutamyl polypeptide synthesis by Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol.76, 499–503. doi: 10.1128/jb.76.5.499-503.1958
103
LiD.HouL.GaoY.TianZ.FanB.WangF.et al. (2022). Recent advances in microbial synthesis of poly-γ-glutamic acid: a review. Food Secur.11:739. doi: 10.3390/foods11050739
104
LiS.QiuY.XuH.WangR.LeiP. (2022). “Recent advances in poly-(γ-glutamic acid) production by microbial fermentation” in Microbial production of high-value products. Microbiology monographs, vol. 37. eds. RehmB. H. A.WibowoD. (Cham: Springer)
105
LiL.WangN.JinX.DengR.NieS.SunL.et al. (2014). Biodegradable and injectable in situ cross-linking chitosan-hyaluronic acid based hydrogels for postoperative adhesion prevention. Biomaterials35, 3903–3917. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.050
106
LiY.WangJ.LiuN.KeL.ZhaoX.QiG. (2020). Microbial synthesis of poly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA) with fulvic acid powder, the waste from yeast molasses fermentation. Biotechnol. Biofuels13, 1–17. doi: 10.1186/s13068-020-01818-
107
LiC.YuD. F.NewmanR. A.CabralF.StephensL. C.HunterN.et al. (1998). Complete regression of well-established tumors using a novel water-soluble poly (L-glutamic acid)-paclitaxel conjugate. Cancer Res.58, 2404–2409. PMID:
108
LimS. M.KimJ.ShimJ. Y.ImmB. Y.SungM. H.ImmJ. Y. (2012). Effect of poly-γ-glutamic acids (PGA) on oil uptake and sensory quality in doughnuts. Food Sci. Biotechnol.21, 247–252. doi: 10.1007/s10068-012-0032-2
109
LiuJ.HeD.LiX. Z.GaoS.WuH.LiuW.et al. (2010). γ-Polyglutamic acid (γ-PGA) produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens C06 promoting its colonization on fruit surface. Int. J. Food Microbiol.142, 190–197. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.06.023
110
LuoZ.GuoY.LiuJ.QiuH.ZhaoM.ZouW.et al. (2016). Microbial synthesis of poly-γ-glutamic acid: current progress, challenges, and future perspectives. Biotechnol. Biofuels9, 134–112. doi: 10.1186/s13068-016-0537-7
111
MaX.LiuS.TangH.YangR.ChiB.YeZ. (2018). In situ photocrosslinked hyaluronic acid and poly (γ-glutamic acid) hydrogels as injectable drug carriers for load-bearing tissue application. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed.29, 2252–2266. doi: 10.1080/09205063.2018.1535820
112
MabroukM.Abou-ZeidD.SabraW. (2012). Application of Plackett–Burman experimental design to evaluate nutritional requirements for poly (γ-glutamic acid) production in batch fermentation by Bacillus licheniformis A13. Afr. J. Appl. Microbiol. Res1, 6–18.
113
ManochaB.MargaritisA. (2010). A novel method for the selective recovery and purification of γ-polyglutamic acid from Bacillus licheniformis fermentation broth. Biotechnol. Prog.26, 734–742. doi: 10.1002/btpr.370
114
MarkcusM. A.DoliveiraL.MalakianK.KeeneyD.SeverinA.UnderwoodK. W.et al. (2004). 1H, 13C, and 15N backbone assignments and secondary structure for the 60.8 kD dimer of the NAD+ synthetase from Bacillus subtilis. J. Biomolecula NMR.28, 301–302.
115
MarkusM. A.DoliveiraL.MalakianK.KeeneyD.SeverinA.UnderwoodK. W.et al. (1985). Comprehensive biotechnology. J. Pergamon3, 1005–1013.
116
McLeanR. J.BeaucheminD.ClaphamL.BeveridgeT. J. (1990). Metal-binding characteristics of the gamma-glutamyl capsular polymer of Bacillus licheniformis ATCC 9945. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.56, 3671–3677. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.12.3671-3677.1990
117
MeissnerL.KauffmannK.WengelerT.MitsunagaH.FukusakiE.BüchsJ. (2015). Influence of nitrogen source and pH value on undesired poly (γ-glutamic acid) formation of a protease producing Bacillus licheniformis strain. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol.42, 1203–1215. doi: 10.1007/s10295-015-1640-7
118
MesnageS.Tosi-CoutureE.GounonP.MockM.FouetA. (1998). The capsule and S-layer: two independent and yet compatible macromolecular structures in Bacillus anthracis. J. Bacteriol.180, 52–58. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.1.52-58.1998
119
MitsuiN.MurasawaH.SekiguchiJ. (2011). Disruption of the cell wall lytic enzyme CwlO affects the amount and molecular size of poly-γ-glutamic acid produced by Bacillus subtilis (natto). J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol.57, 35–43. doi: 10.2323/jgam.57.35
120
MitsunagaH.MeissnerL.BüchsJ.FukusakiE. (2016). Branched chain amino acids maintain the molecular weight of poly (γ-glutamic acid) of Bacillus licheniformis ATCC 9945 during the fermentation. J. Biosci. Bioeng.122, 400–405. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2016.03.007
121
MoraesL. P.AlegreR. M.BritoP. N. (2012). Optimisation of poly (γ-glutamic acid) production by Bacillus velezensis NRRL B-23189 in liquid fermentation with molasses as the carbon source without addition of glutamic acid. Int. Rev. Chem. Eng4, 618–623.
122
MorelliC. F.CalvioC.BiagiottiM.SperanzaG. (2014). pH-dependent hydrolase, glutaminase, transpeptidase and autotranspeptidase activities of Bacillus subtilis γ-glutamyltransferase. FEBS J.281, 232–245. doi: 10.1111/febs.12591
123
NairP.NavaleG. R.DharneM. S. (2023). Poly-gamma-glutamic acid biopolymer: A sleeping giant with diverse applications and unique opportunities for commercialization. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery13, 4555–4573. doi: 10.1007/s13399-021-01467-0
124
NguyenQ. T.KwakC.LeeW. S.KimJ.JeongJ.SungM. H.et al. (2019). Poly-γ-glutamic acid complexed with alum induces cross-protective immunity of pandemic H1N1 vaccine. Front. Immunol.10:1604. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01604
125
NiemetzR.KärcherU.KandlerO.TindallB. J.KönigH. (1997). The cell wall polymer of the extremely halophilic archaeon Natronococcus occultus. Eur. J. Biochem.249, 905–911. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.00905.x
126
OdeniyiO. A.OmoleyeT. E. (2021). Characterization and statistical optimization of γ-PGA produced by Bacillus megaterium UP47 isolated from Pentaclethra macrophylla. Polim. Med.51, 57–67. doi: 10.17219/pim/143975
127
OgawaY.YamaguchiF.YuasaK.TaharaY. (1997). Efficient production of γ-polyglutamic acid by Bacillus subtilis (natto) in jar fermenters. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.61, 1684–1687. doi: 10.1271/bbb.61.1684
128
OgunleyeA.BhatA.IrorereV. U.HillD.WilliamsC.RadeckaI. (2015). Poly-γ-glutamic acid: production, properties and applications. Microbiology161, 1–17. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.081448-0
129
OhsawaT.TsukaharaK.OguraM. (2009). Bacillus subtilis response regulator DegU is a direct activator of pgsB transcription involved in γ-poly-glutamic acid synthesis. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.73, 2096–2102. doi: 10.1271/bbb.90341
130
OkayO. (2010). “General properties of hydrogels” in Hydrogel sensors and actuators: engineering and technology. eds. GerlachG.ArndtK.-F. (Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer), 1–14.
131
OseraC.AmatiG.CalvioC.GalizziA. (2009). SwrAA activates poly-γ-glutamate synthesis in addition to swarming in Bacillus subtilis. Microbiology155, 2282–2287. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.026435-0
132
OtaniY.TabataY.IkadaY. (1999). Sealing effect of rapidly curable gelatin-poly (L-glutamic acid) hydrogel glue on lung air leak. Ann. Thorac. Surg.67, 922–926. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00153-8
133
PangX.LeiP.FengX.XuZ.XuH.LiuK. (2018). Poly-γ-glutamic acid, a bio-chelator, alleviates the toxicity of cd and Pb in the soil and promotes the establishment of healthy Cucumis sativus L. seedling. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.25, 19975–19988. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1890-9
134
ParkJ. H.ChoiJ. C.SungM. H.KangJ. H.ChangM. J. (2011). High molecular weight poly-gamma-glutamic acid regulates lipid metabolism in rats fed a high-fat diet and humans. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.21, 766–775. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1104.04047
135
ParkY.StorksonJ. M.AlbrightK. J.LiuW.ParizaM. W. (2005). Biological activities of conjugated fatty acids: conjugated eicosadienoic (conj. 20: 2Δc11, t13/t12, c14), eicosatrienoic (conj. 20: 3Δc8, t12, c14), and heneicosadienoic (conj. 21: 2Δc12, t14/c13, t15) acids and other metabolites of conjugated linoleic acid. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1687, 120–129. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2004.11.010
136
PatelN. B.PatelA. L.ChauhanH. I. (2007). Synthesis of amide derivatives of quinolone and their antimicrobial studies. Available at: http://nopr.niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/394
137
PengY.JiangB.ZhangT.MuW.MiaoM.HuaY. (2015). High-Level production of poly (γ-glutamic acid) by a newly isolated glutamate-independent strain, Bacillus methylotrophicus. Process Biochem.50, 329–335. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2014.12.024
138
PengY.ZhangT.MuW.MiaoM.JiangB. (2016). Intracellular synthesis of glutamic acid in Bacillus methylotrophicus SK19. 001, a glutamate-independent poly (γ-glutamic acid)-producing strain. J. Sci. Food Agric.96, 66–72. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.7318
139
PoliA.GugliandoloC.SpanòA.TaurisanoV.Di DonatoP.MaugeriT. L.et al. (2015). Poly-[gamma]-glutamic acid from Bacillus Horneckiae strain APA of shallow marine vent origin with antiviral and immunomodulatory effects against herpes simplex virus Type-2. J. Mar. Sci. Res. Dev.5:1. doi: 10.4172/2155-9910.1000173
140
RichardA.MargaritisA. (2001). Poly (glutamic acid) for biomedical applications. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol.21, 219–232. doi: 10.1080/07388550108984171
141
RichardA.MargaritisA. (2003). Rheology, oxygen transfer, and molecular weight characteristics of poly(glutamic acid) fermentation by Bacillus subtilis. Biotechnol. Bioeng.82, 299–305. doi: 10.1002/bit.10568
142
RichardA.MargaritisA. (2006). Kinetics of molecular weight reduction of poly (glutamic acid) by in situ depolymerization in cell-free broth of Bacillus subtilis. Biochem. Eng. J.30, 303–307. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2006.05.014
143
RyuM.NakazawaT.AkagiT.TanakaT.WatanabeR.YasudaM.et al. (2011). Suppression of phagocytic cells in retinal disorders using amphiphilic poly (γ-glutamic acid) nanoparticles containing dexamethasone. J. Control. Release151, 65–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.11.029
144
ScheelR. A.FusiA. D.MinB. C.ThomasC. M.RamaraoB. V.NomuraC. T. (2019). Increased production of the value-added biopolymers poly (R-3-hydroxyalkanoate) and poly (γ-glutamic acid) from hydrolyzed paper recycling waste fines. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.7:409. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00409
145
ScoffoneV.DondiD.BiinoG.BorgheseG.PasiniD.GalizziA.et al. (2013). Knockout of pgdS and ggt genes improves γ-PGA yield in B. subtilis. Biotechnol. Bioeng.110, 2006–2012. doi: 10.1002/bit.24846
146
SebastiánG. M.MontserratA.JoséA. P. (2013). Chemical modification of microbial poly (γ-glutamic acid). J. Renew. Mater.1, 42–60. doi: 10.7569/JRM.2012.634105
147
ShiI. L.VanY. T.ChangY. N. (2002). Application of statistical experimental methods to optimize production of poly (γ-glutamic acid) by Bacillus licheniformis CCRC 12826. Enzym. Microb. Technol.31, 213–220. doi: 10.1016/S0141-0229(02)00103-5
148
ShihL.VanY. T. (2001). The production of poly-(γ-glutamic acid) from microorganisms and its various applications. Bioresour. Technol.79, 207–225. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00074-8
149
ShihI. L.VanY. T.YehL. C.LinH. G.ChangY. N. (2001). Production of a biopolymer flocculant from Bacillus licheniformis and its flocculation properties. Bioresour. Technol.78, 267–272. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00027-X
150
ShihL.WuP. J.ShiehC. J. (2005). Microbial production of a poly (γ-glutamic acid) derivative by Bacillus subtilis. Process Biochem.40, 2827–2832. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2004.12.009
151
ShinE. J.SungM. J.ParkJ. H.YangH. J.KimM. S.HurH. J.et al. (2015). Poly-gamma-glutamic acid induces apoptosis via reduction of COX-2 expression in TPA-induced HT-29 human colorectal Cancer cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci.16, 7577–7586. doi: 10.3390/ijms1604757
152
SiaterlisA.DeepikaG.CharalampopoulosD. (2009). Effect of culture medium and cryoprotectants on the growth and survival of probiotic lactobacilli during freeze drying. Lett. Appl. Microbiol.48, 295–301. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02529.x
153
SingerJ. W. (2005). Paclitaxel poliglumex (XYOTAX™, CT-2103): a macromolecular taxane. J. Control. Release109, 120–126. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.09.033
154
SinghV.HaqueS.NiwasR.SrivastavaA.PasupuletiM.TripathiC. K. M. (2016). Strategies for fermentation medium optimization: an in-depth review. Front. Microbiol.7:2087. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02087
155
SirisansaneeyakulS.CaoM.KongklomN.ChuensangjunC.ShiZ.ChistiY. (2017). Microbial production of poly-γ-glutamic acid. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.33, 1–8. doi: 10.1007/s11274-017-2338-y
156
SmithI. H.PaceG. W. (1982). Recovery of microbial polysaccharides. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.32, 119–129. doi: 10.1002/jctb.5030320116
157
SolimanN. A.BerekaaM. M.Abdel-FattahY. R. (2005). Polyglutamic acid (PGA) production by Bacillus sp. SAB-26: application of Plackett–Burman experimental design to evaluate culture requirements. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.69, 259–267. doi: 10.1007/s00253-005-1982-6
158
SpizizenJ. (1958). Transformation of biochemically deficient strains of Bacillus subtilis by deoxyribonucleate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.44, 1072–1078. doi: 10.1073/pnas.44.10.1072
159
StanleyN. R.LazazzeraB. A. (2005). Defining the genetic differences between wild and domestic strains of Bacillus subtilis that affect poly-γ-DL-glutamic acid production and biofilm formation. Mol. Microbiol.57, 1143–1158. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04746.x
160
SungM. H.ParkC.ChoiJ. C.UyamaH.ParkS. L. (2005a). Hyaluronidase inhibitor containing poly-gamma-glutamic acid as an effective component. US Patent 12/090678
161
SungM. H.ParkC.KimC. J.PooH.SodaK.AshiuchiM. (2005b). Natural and edible biopolymer poly-γ-glutamic acid: synthesis, production, and applications. Chem. Rec.5, 352–366. doi: 10.1002/tcr.20061
162
TajimaT.SukigaraS. (2012). Effect of alum treatment on the mechanical and antibacterial properties of poly-g-glutamic acid nanofibers. Text. Res. J.82, 1211–1219. doi: 10.1177/0040517511436207
163
TamuraM.HoriS.InoseA.KoboriM. (2020). Effects of γ-Polyglutamic acid on blood glucose and Caecal short chain fatty acids in adult male mice. Food Nutr. Sci.11, 8–22. doi: 10.4236/fns.2020.111002
164
TangB.LeiP.XuZ.JiangY.XuZ.LiangJ.et al. (2015). Highly efficient rice straw utilization for poly-(γ-glutamic acid) production by Bacillus subtilis NX-2. Bioresour. Technol.193, 370–376. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.05.110
165
TanimotoH.FoxT.EaglesJ.SatohH.NozawaH.OkiyamaA.et al. (2007). Acute effect of poly-γ-glutamic acid on calcium absorption in post-menopausal women. J. Am. Coll. Nutr.26, 645–649. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2007.10719642
166
TaruiY.IidaH.OnoE.MikiW.HirasawaE.FujitaK. I.et al. (2005). Biosynthesis of poly-γ-glutamic acid in plants: transient expression of poly-γ-glutamate synthetase complex in tobacco leaves. J. Biosci. Bioeng.100, 443–448. doi: 10.1263/jbb.100.443
167
TianG.FuJ.WeiX.JiZ.MaX.QiG.et al. (2014). Enhanced expression of pgdS gene for high production of poly-γ-glutamic aicd with lower molecular weight in Bacillus licheniformis WX-02. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.89, 1825–1832. doi: 10.1002/jctb.4261
168
TianT.KangJ. W.KangA.LeeT. S. (2019). Redirecting metabolic flux via combinatorial multiplex CRISPRi-mediated repression for isopentenol production in Escherichia coli. ACS Synth. Biol.8, 391–402. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.8b00429
169
TomcsikJ.SzongottH. (1933). On a specific protein of the capsule of the Anthrax Bacillus. Z. Immun.forsch. Exp. Ther.78, 86–99.
170
TorkS. E.AlyM. M.AlakilliS. Y.Al-SeeniM. N. (2015). Purification and characterization of gamma poly glutamic acid from newly Bacillus licheniformis NRC20. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.74, 382–391. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.12.017
171
TranL. S. P.NagaiT.ItohY. (2000). Divergent structure of the ComQXPA quorum-sensing components: molecular basis of strain-specific communication mechanism in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol.37, 1159–1171. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02069.x
172
TroyF. A. (1973). Chemistry and biosynthesis of the poly (γ-d-glutamyl) capsule in Bacillus licheniformis: I. Properties of the membrane-mediated biosynthetic reaction. J. Biol. Chem.248, 305–315. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)44475-X
173
TsaoD. H. (2004). 1H, 13C, and 15N backbone assignments and secondary structure for the 60.8 kD dimer of the NAD+ synthetase from Bacillus subtilis. J. Biomol. NMR28, 301–302.
174
TsaoC. T.ChangC. H.LinY. Y.WuM. F.WangJ. L.HanJ. L.et al. (2010). Antibacterial activity and biocompatibility of a chitosan–γ-poly (glutamic acid) polyelectrolyte complex hydrogel. Carbohydr. Res.345, 1774–1780. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2010.06.002
175
TsaoC. T.ChangC. H.LinY. Y.WuM. F.WangJ. L.YounT. H.et al. (2011). Evaluation of chitosan/γ-poly (glutamic acid) polyelectrolyte complex for wound dressing materials. Carbohydr. Polym.84, 812–819. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.034
176
UrushibataY.TokuyamaS.TaharaY. (2002). Characterization of the Bacillus subtilis ywsC gene, involved in γ-polyglutamic acid production. J. Bacteriol.184, 337–343. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.2.337-343.2002
177
VedadghavamiA.MinooeiF.MohammadiM. H.KhetaniS.KolahchiA. R.MashayekhanS.et al. (2017). Manufacturing of hydrogel biomaterials with controlled mechanical properties for tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater.62, 42–63. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.07.028
178
WangS.CaoX.ShenM.GuoR.BányaiI.ShiX. (2012). Fabrication and morphology control of electrospun poly(γ-glutamic acid) nanofibers for biomedical applications. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces89, 254–264. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.09.029
179
WangL.ChenS.YuB. (2022). Poly-γ-glutamic acid: recent achievements, diverse applications and future perspectives. Trends Food Sci. Technol.119, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.11.009
180
WangQ.ChenS.ZhangJ.SunM.LiuZ.YuZ. (2008). Co-producing lipopeptides and poly-γ-glutamic acid by solid-state fermentation of Bacillus subtilis using soybean and sweet potato residues and its biocontrol and fertilizer synergistic effects. Bioresour. Technol.99, 3318–3323. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.05.052
181
WangF.LiangJ.XiaoW.WangW.FuD. (2017). Improved production of poly-γ-glutamate by newly Bacillus subtilis 115. J. Biobaased Mater. Bioenergy11, 159–168. doi: 10.1166/jbmb.2017.1650
182
WangJ.YuanH.WeiX.ChenJ.ChenS. (2016). Enhancement of poly-γ-glutamic acid production by alkaline pH stress treatment in Bacillus licheniformis WX-02. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.91, 2399–2403. doi: 10.1002/jctb.4822
183
WeberJ. (1990). Poly (gamma-glutamic acid) s are the major constituents of nematocysts in Hydra (Hydrozoa, Cnidaria). J. Biol. Chem.265, 9664–9669. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)38721-6
184
WeiX.JiZ.ChenS. (2010). Isolation of halotolerant Bacillus licheniformis WX-02 and regulatory effects of sodium chloride on yield and molecular sizes of poly-γ-glutamic acid. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.160, 1332–1340. doi: 10.1007/s12010-009-8681-1
185
WuQ.XuH.LiangJ.YaoJ. (2010a). Contribution of glycerol on production of poly (γ-glutamic acid) in Bacillus subtilis NX-2. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.160, 386–392. doi: 10.1007/s12010-008-8320-2
186
WuQ.XuH.ShiN.YaoJ.LiS.OuyangP. (2008). Improvement of poly (γ-glutamic acid) biosynthesis and redistribution of metabolic flux with the presence of different additives in Bacillus subtilis CGMCC 0833. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.79, 527–535. doi: 10.1007/s00253-008-1462-x
187
WuQ.XuH.XuL.OuyangP. (2006). Biosynthesis of poly (γ-glutamic acid) in Bacillus subtilis NX-2: regulation of stereochemical composition of poly (γ-glutamic acid). Process Biochem.41, 1650–1655. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2006.03.034
188
WuQ.XuH.YingH.OuyangP. (2010b). Kinetic analysis and pH-shift control strategy for poly (γ-glutamic acid) production with Bacillus subtilis CGMCC 0833. Biochem. Eng. J.50, 24–28. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2010.02.012
189
XieX.WuX.ShenY.SongM.XuC.ZhangB.et al. (2020). Effect of poly-γ-glutamic acid on hydration and structure of wheat gluten. J. Food Sci.85, 3214–3219. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.15400
190
XuZ.ShiF.CenP., (2005). Production of polyglutamic acid from mixed glucose and sucrose by co-cultivation of Bacillus subtilis and Corynebacterium glutamicum. In The 2005 AIChE annual meeting, Cincinnati (Vol. 4).
191
YanagibashiT.KobayashiM.OmoriK. (2019). Application of poly-γ-glutamic acid Flocculant to flocculation–sedimentation treatment of ultrafine cement suspension. Water11:1748. doi: 10.3390/w11091748
192
YaoJ.JingJ.XuH.LiangJ.WuQ.FengX.et al. (2009). Investigation on enzymatic degradation of γ-polyglutamic acid from Bacillus subtilis NX-2. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym.56, 158–164. doi: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2007.12.027
193
YiY.XieC.LiuJ.ZhengY.WangJ.LuX. (2021). Self-adhesive hydrogels for tissue engineering. J. Mat. Chem. B.9, 8739–8767. doi: 10.1039/D1TB01503F
194
YokoiH.NatsudaO.HiroseJ.HayashiS.TakasakiY. (1995). Characteristics of a biopolymer flocculant produced by Bacillus sp. PY-90. J. Ferment. Bioeng.79, 378–380. doi: 10.1016/0922-338X(95)94000-H
195
YongX.RazaW.YuG.RanW.ShenQ.YangX. (2011). Optimization of the production of poly-γ-glutamic acid by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens C1 in solid-state fermentation using dairy manure compost and monosodium glutamate production residues as basic substrates. Bioresour. Technol.102, 7548–7554. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.05.057
196
YoonS. H.Hwan DoJ.Yup LeeS.Nam ChangH. (2000). Production of poly-γ-glutamic acid by fed-batch culture of Bacillus licheniformis. Biotechnol. Lett.22, 585–588. doi: 10.1023/A:1005625026623
197
YoungH. K.RichardA. G. (1988). Effects of glucose and glycerol on γ-poly(glutamic acid) formation by Bacillus licheniformis ATCC 9945a. Biotech. Bioengine.57, 430–437. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19980220)57:4<430::AID-BIT6>3.0.CO;2-N
198
YuH.LiuH.WangL.ZhangY.TianH.MaX. (2018). Effect of poly-γ-glutamic acid on the stability of set yoghurts. J. Food Sci. Technol.55, 4634–4641. doi: 10.1007/s13197-018-3404-7
199
YuZ.WeiY.FuC.SablaniS. S.HuangZ.HanC.et al. (2023). Antimicrobial activity of gamma-poly (glutamic acid), a preservative coating for cherris. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces225:113272. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2023.113272
200
YuC.ZangY.WangL.WangM.LiuD.DingY.et al. (2021). Rapid and rapid method to quantify poly (γ-glutamic acid) content via copper ion complexation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.180, 411–417. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.03.030
201
ZengW.ChenG.GuoY.ZhangB.DongM.WuY.et al. (2017). Production of poly-γ-glutamic acid by a thermotolerant glutamate-independent strain and comparative analysis of the glutamate dependent difference. AMB Express7, 1–13. doi: 10.1186/s13568-017-0512-0
202
ZengW.ChenG.WangQ.ZhengS.ShuL.LiangZ. (2014). Metabolic studies of temperature control strategy on poly (γ-glutamic acid) production in a thermophilic strain Bacillus subtilis GXA-28. Bioresour. Technol.155, 104–110. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.086
203
ZengW.ChenG.WuY.DongM.ZhangB.LiangZ. (2018). Nonsterilized fermentative production of poly-γ-glutamic acid from cassava starch and corn steep powder by a thermophilic Bacillus subtilis. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.93, 2917–2924. doi: 10.1002/jctb.5646
204
ZhanY.ShengB.WangH.ShiJ.CaiD.YiL.et al. (2018). Rewiring glycerol metabolism for enhanced production of poly-γ-glutamic acid in Bacillus licheniformis. Biotechnol. Biofuels11, 306–314. doi: 10.1186/s13068-018-1311-9
205
ZhangD.FengX.ZhouZ.ZhangY.XuH. (2012). Economical production of poly (γ-glutamic acid) using untreated cane molasses and monosodium glutamate waste liquor by Bacillus subtilis NX-2. Bioresour. Technol.114, 583–588. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.114
206
ZhangL.GaoD.LiJ.FangN.WangL.ShiY. (2016). Effects of poly-γ-glutamic acid on soil nitrogen and carbon leaching and CO2 fluxes in a sandy clay loam soil. Can. J. Soil Sci.97, 319–328. doi: 10.1139/cjss-2016-0127
207
ZhangW.HeY.GaoW.FengJ.CaoM.YangC.et al. (2015). Deletion of genes involved in glutamate metabolism to improve poly-gamma-glutamic acid production in B. amyloliquefaciens LL3. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol.42, 297–305. doi: 10.1007/s10295-014-1563-8
208
ZhangC.WuD. J.JiaJ.YangH. Q. (2019a). Fishmeal wastewater as a low-cost nitrogen source for γ-polyglutamic acid production using Bacillus subtilis. Waste Biomass Valorization10, 789–795. doi: 10.1007/s12649-017-0100-1
209
ZhangC.WuD.RenH. (2019b). Economical production of agricultural γ-polyglutamic acid using industrial wastes by Bacillus subtilis. Biochem. Eng. J.146, 117–123. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2019.03.013
210
ZhangL.YangX.GaoD.WangL.LiJ.WeiZ.et al. (2017). Effects of poly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA) on plant growth and its distribution in a controlled plant-soil system. Sci. Rep.7:6090. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06248-2
211
ZhangL.ZhuX.WuS.ChenY.TanS.LiuY.et al. (2018). Fabrication and evaluation of a γ-PGA-based self-assembly transferrin receptor-targeting anticancer drug carrier. Int. J. Nanomedicine13, 7873–7889. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S181121
212
ZhangH.ZhuJ.ZhuX.CaiJ.ZhangA.HongY.et al. (2012). High-level exogenous glutamic acid-independent production of poly-(γ-glutamic acid) with organic acid addition in a new isolated Bacillus subtilis C10. Bioresour. Technol.116, 241–246. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.085
213
ZhaoC.ZhangY.WeiX.HuZ.ZhuF.XuL.et al. (2013). Production of ultra-high molecular weight poly-γ-glutamic acid with Bacillus licheniformis P-104 and characterization of its flocculation properties. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.170, 562–572. doi: 10.1007/s12010-013-0214-2
214
ZhuF.CaiJ.ZhengQ.ZhuX.CenP.XuZ. (2014). A novel approach for poly-γ-glutamic acid production using xylose and corncob fibres hydrolysate in Bacillus subtillis HB-1. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.89, 616–622. doi: 10.1002/jctb.4169
215
ZwartouwH. T.SmithH. (1956). Polyglutamic acid from Bacillus anthracis grown in vivo: structure and aggressin activity. Biochem. J.63, 437–442. doi: 10.1042/bj0630437
Summary
Keywords
poly (γ-glutamic acid), (γ-PGA), microbial biopolymer, medical applications, food applications, pharmaceutical applications
Citation
Elbanna K, Alsulami FS, Neyaz LA and Abulreesh HH (2024) Poly (γ) glutamic acid: a unique microbial biopolymer with diverse commercial applicability. Front. Microbiol. 15:1348411. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1348411
Received
02 December 2023
Accepted
19 January 2024
Published
13 February 2024
Volume
15 - 2024
Edited by
Ming Jun Zhu, South China University of Technology, China
Reviewed by
Jitendra Mishra, Amity University, India
Xian Zhang, Jiangnan University, China
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2024 Elbanna, Alsulami, Neyaz and Abulreesh.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Khaled Elbanna, kab00@fayoum.edu.eg
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.