ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 15 June 2026

Sec. Food Microbiology

Volume 17 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2026.1800624

Detection and characterization of Clostridium botulinum isolated from powdered infant formula

  • 1. IEH Laboratories and Consulting Group, Lake Forest Park, WA, United States

  • 2. ByHeart, New York, NY, United States

Abstract

Introduction:

As a part of an ongoing investigation of the 2025 multistate outbreak of infant botulism linked to consumption of powdered infant formula (PIF), various samples – including unopened containers of PIF and base powder (bulk PIF before packaging) – were analyzed for the presence of Clostridium botulinum.

Methods:

Samples were screened using a tiered analytical approach: anaerobic enrichment followed by real-time PCR targeting botulinum neurotoxin-associated genes, confirmatory PCR, amplicon sequencing, colony isolation, and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). C. botulinum was detected in both the finished product and base powder.

Results:

Genomic analysis revealed genetic identity between isolates from one finished product lot and a base powder, while an isolate from another lot was distinct. Importantly, detection occurred in samples with non-detectable sulfite-reducing clostridia (SRC).

Conclusion:

Results of this study demonstrate that indicator-based screening (such as SRC enumeration) even if it had been in place before the outbreak, would not have prevented its occurrence. Positive linkage of an infant botulism outbreak to PIF should compel manufacturers to recognize C. botulinum as a hazard reasonably likely to occur in certain ingredients, necessitating the design and implementation of specific preventative controls.

1 Introduction

Clostridium botulinum is an obligate anaerobic, spore-forming bacterium capable of producing botulinum neurotoxins (BoNT), which are among the most potent biological toxins known. These neurotoxins cause botulism, a rare but severe paralytic illness that presents a particular risk to infants, whose immature gut microbiota and physiological conditions allow intestinal colonization and in situ toxin production (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1998; Lindström and Korkeala, 2006; Harris and Dabritz, 2024). Infant botulism is most associated with environmental exposure to spores originating from soil and dust; however, additional exposure pathways remain of concern given the extreme toxicity of BoNT and the low infectious dose required for disease (Hauschild and Dodds, 1993; Peck, 2009).

PIF has historically been considered a potential vehicle of concern for spore-forming bacteria because of its low water activity, extended shelf life, and the inherent resistance of clostridial spores to desiccation and other environmental stresses (American Public Health Association, 2015; Hauschild and Dodds, 1993; Doyle and Buchanan, 2013). Despite the theoretical considerations, the prevailing view and the advice given to the industry in recent years has been that C. botulinum is not a hazard reasonably likely to occur in PIF manufacturing.

In a 2004 Joint FAO/WHO Expert Meeting on Microbiological Risk Assessment, C. botulinum was classified as a microorganism capable of causing illness in infants but not identified as a hazard in PIF (Joint FAO/WHO Expert Meetings on Microbiological Risk Assessment (JEMRA) and World Health Organization, 2004). Consequently, C. botulinum is not regarded as a hazard in the Codex Code of Hygienic Practice for Powdered Formulae for Infants and Young Children (Codex Alimentarius Commission and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2008). Building on this assessment, the International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods (ICMSF) (2014) recommended the use of SRC enumeration as a general indicator of anaerobic spore contamination, rather than routine testing for clostridial spores or C. botulinum, reflecting the presumed low prevalence of the organism in infant formula.

Nevertheless, the severe clinical consequences of botulism and the heightened vulnerability of the infant population necessitate continued vigilance. Within this context, the detection, isolation, and characterization of C. botulinum from infant formula–associated matrices provide valuable insights into contamination pathways, organism persistence, and the limitations of current detection strategies (Peck, 2009; Popoff and Bouvet, 2013).

In 2025, a multistate outbreak of infant botulism in the United States prompted recalls of PIF products1. As part of the associated investigation, IEH Laboratories and Consulting Group was engaged to screen, detect, and characterize C. botulinum from finished products, using a tiered analytical approach combining anaerobic enrichment, molecular screening, culture confirmation, and genomic analysis.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Enumeration assays

A 25 g portion of sample was enumerated for aerobic and anaerobic mesophilic spores according to the Compendium of Methods for the Microbial Examination of Foods (Fifth edition). Sulfite reducing clostridia were enumerated according to ISO 15213-1:2023 (2023).

2.2 Enrichment and qPCR

A 100 g portion of the sample was enriched for botulinum-producing clostridia (spores and vegetative cells) by germination and growth in tryptone-peptose-glucose-yeast extract (TPGY) broth under anaerobic conditions following ISO/TS 17919:2013 (2013) protocol with minor modifications such as larger sample size. All samples were subjected to heat shock at 70–80 °C for 10–12 min before enrichment. After enrichment, a 1 mL aliquot of enrichment media was subjected to DNA purification using silica coated magnetic beads and the DNA eluted in 50 μL of sterile deionized water. A 2 μL aliquot of eluted DNA was tested using a C. botulinum BoNT/A and BoNT/B Real-Time PCR assay. The assay uses primers and probes for BoNT/A and BoNT/B as specified in ISO/TS 17919:2013 (2013) Annex C. The assay targets BoNT/B (FAM), BoNT/A (HEX), and C. spp. 16S (ROX) ribosomal RNA genes, as well as an internal control target in the Cy5 channel. PCR cycling was as follows: 95 °C, 5 min; 40 cycles of 95 °C, 20 s, 55 °C, 20 s, 72 °C, 20 s.

2.3 Confirmation of the presence of C. botulinum

Presumptive positive enrichment cultures were subjected to multiple PCR amplifications using the FDA botA983 primer set (U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 2025), an in-house botA782 primer set, and the FDA botB492 primer set (U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 2025). PCR amplicons were purified using silica-based spin columns and sequenced on a Flongle flow cell using the MinION Mk1C platform (Oxford Nanopore Technologies), following manufacturer’s instructions.

2.4 Isolation and whole genome sequencing of C. botulinum

Confirmed positive enrichment cultures were streaked on Botulinum Selective Media (BSM) and incubated under anaerobic conditions to obtain isolated colonies. Representative colonies were screened by in-house multiplex PCR assays targeting BoNT/A, BoNT/B, fldB and ntnh genes. PCR-positive colonies were subsequently enriched overnight in TPGY broth. Genomic DNA was extracted from overnight cultures using silica-based spin columns, followed by library preparation with Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit and sequencing using the MiSeq v2 Reagent Kit on the MiSeq platform (Illumina, CA, United States).

2.5 Sequencing analysis

The raw sequencing reads were checked using FastQC for Quality Control before de novo assembly using the SPAdes assembler. Species identity was confirmed using the Type (Strain) Genome Server (TYGS). Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis was performed using the FDA CFSAN SNP Pipeline to assess genetic relatedness among isolates.

3 Results

Of the three lots of finished product initially tested as part of the outbreak response, 2 lots had presumptive positives (BoNT/A) – 4 of 12 samples from the first lot and 2 of 12 samples from the second lot (Table 1).

Table 1

Lot#Sample IDBoNT/A or BoNT/B real-time PCRC. spp. (16S) real-time PCRTAMSa (CFU/g)TAnMSb (CFU/g)SRCc (CFU/g)
251261P21233392-001BoNT/A onlyPresumptive positive20NDdND
1233392-002NegativePresumptive positiveNDNDND
1233392-003NegativePresumptive positiveNDNDND
1233392-004BoNT/A onlyPresumptive positive40NDND
1233392-005NegativePresumptive positive40NDND
1233392-006NegativePresumptive positive20NDND
1233392-007NegativePresumptive positive2010ND
1233392-008NegativePresumptive positive40NDND
1233392-009BoNT/A onlyPresumptive positive20NDND
1233392-010NegativePresumptive positiveND10ND
1233392-011NegativePresumptive positiveNDNDND
1233392-012BoNT/A onlyPresumptive positive2010ND
251131P21233393-001NegativePresumptive positive2020ND
1233393-002NegativePresumptive positive4010ND
1233393-003NegativePresumptive positive1010ND
1233393-004NegativePresumptive positiveND20ND
1233393-005BoNT/A onlyPresumptive positiveNDNDND
1233393-006NegativePresumptive positiveND10ND
1233393-007NegativePresumptive positive20NDND
1233393-008NegativePresumptive positiveNDNDND
1233393-009NegativePresumptive positive20NDND
1233393-010NegativePresumptive positive50NDND
1233393-011NegativePresumptive positive1010ND
1233393-012BoNT/A onlyPresumptive positive2020ND
243201P21233394-001NegativePresumptive positive20NDND
1233394-002NegativePresumptive positive20ND10
1233394-003NegativePresumptive positive10NDND
1233394-004NegativePresumptive positive20NDND
1233394-005NegativePresumptive positive2010ND
1233394-006NegativePresumptive positive4030ND
1233394-007NegativePresumptive positive1010ND
1233394-008NegativePresumptive positive5010ND
1233394-009NegativePresumptive positive1010ND
1233394-010NegativePresumptive positive20NDND
1233394-011NegativePresumptive positive3010ND
1233394-012NegativePresumptive positive20NDND

Testing results for three lots of finished product.

a

TAMS, Thermal aerobic selection plating.

b

TAnMS, Thermal anaerobic selection plating.

c

Sulfite-reducing clostridia plating.

d

Not detected.Real-time PCR positive for bont gene.

Of the 9 lots of base powder initially tested, 3 lots had presumptive positives – 2 of 8 samples from one lot and 1 of 8 samples each from the other two lots (Table 2).

Table 2

Lot#ToteMixSample IDBoNT/A or BoNT/B real-time PCRC. spp. (16S) real-time PCRTAMSa (CFU/g)TAnMSb (CFU/g)SRCc (CFU/g)
A311233418-001NegativePresumptive positive10NDdND
621233418-002NegativePresumptive positive20NDND
1031233418-003NegativePresumptive positive10NDND
1441233418-004NegativePresumptive positive20NDND
1851233418-005NegativePresumptive positive10NDND
2261233418-006NegativePresumptive positive20NDND
2671233418-007NegativePresumptive positive20NDND
B311233418-008NegativePresumptive positive3010ND
621233418-009NegativePresumptive positive10NDND
1031233418-010NegativePresumptive positive40NDND
1441233418-011NegativePresumptive positive20NDND
1851233418-012NegativePresumptive positive301010
2261233418-013NegativePresumptive positive2010ND
2671233418-014NegativePresumptive positive40NDND
C311233418-015NegativePresumptive positive10NDND
621233418-016NegativePresumptive positive20NDND
1031233418-017NegativePresumptive positive2010ND
1441233418-018NegativePresumptive positiveNDNDND
1851233418-019NegativeNegative1010ND
2261233418-020NegativePresumptive positiveND10ND
2671233418-021NegativePresumptive positive10NDND
3081233418-022NegativePresumptive positive10NDND
D311233418-023NegativePresumptive positive1030ND
621233418-024NegativePresumptive positive10NDND
1031233418-025NegativePresumptive positive2020ND
1441233418-026NegativePresumptive positive20NDND
1851233418-027NegativePresumptive positive3020ND
2261233418-028NegativePresumptive positive10NDND
2671233418-029NegativePresumptive positive1010ND
3081233418-030NegativePresumptive positive20NDND
E311233418-031NegativePresumptive positive20NDND
621233418-032BoNT/A onlyPresumptive positive2010ND
1031233418-033NegativePresumptive positive301010
1441233418-034NegativePresumptive positiveNDNDND
1851233418-035NegativePresumptive positive2020ND
2261233418-036NegativePresumptive positive10NDND
2671233418-037NegativePresumptive positive10NDND
3081233418-038NegativePresumptive positive30NDND
F311233418-039NegativePresumptive positive20NDND
621233418-040NegativePresumptive positive1020ND
1031233418-041NegativePresumptive positive1010ND
1441233418-042NegativePresumptive positive2010ND
1851233418-043NegativePresumptive positiveNDNDND
2261233418-044NegativePresumptive positive2010ND
2671233418-045NegativePresumptive positive20NDND
3081233418-046NegativePresumptive positive30NDND
G311233418-047NegativePresumptive positive10NDND
521233418-048NegativePresumptive positiveNDNDND
731233418-049NegativePresumptive positiveNDNDND
1041233418-050NegativePresumptive positive1010ND
1251233418-051NegativePresumptive positiveNDNDND
1661233418-052NegativePresumptive positive1010ND
2071233418-053NegativePresumptive positive10NDND
2481233418-054NegativePresumptive positive20NDND
H311233418-055NegativePresumptive positive1010ND
621233418-056NegativePresumptive positive10NDND
1031233418-057NegativePresumptive positive10NDND
1441233418-058NegativePresumptive positiveND10ND
1851233418-059NegativePresumptive positive40NDND
2261233418-060BoNT/A onlyPresumptive positive20NDND
2671233418-061BoNT/A onlyPresumptive positive3010ND
3081233418-062NegativePresumptive positive20NDND
I311233418-063NegativePresumptive positive10NDND
621233418-064NegativePresumptive positive30NDND
1031233418-065NegativePresumptive positive20NDND
1441233418-066BoNT/A onlyPresumptive positiveND20ND
1851233418-067NegativePresumptive positiveNDNDND
2261233418-068NegativePresumptive positive20NDND
2671233418-069NegativePresumptive positive30NDND
3081233418-070NegativePresumptive positive2010ND

Testing results for nine lots of base powder.

a

TAMS, Thermal aerobic selection plating.

b

TAnMS, Thermal anaerobic selection plating.

c

Sulfite-reducing clostridia plating.

d

Not detected.Real-time PCR positive for bont gene.

All six presumptive positives from finished product (Table 1) and two presumptive positives from base powder confirmed positive for C. botulinum by amplicon sequencing of the neurotoxin genes.

Confirmed positive enrichment samples were streaked for isolation. Four colonies from lot #1233393-005 and one colony from lot #1233392-004 of finished product were isolated. One colony from lot #1233418-066 of base powder was also isolated.

Bacteria from isolated colonies were subjected to whole genome sequencing and compared to each other as well as four whole genome sequences from NCBI using SNP analysis (Table 3). The four isolates taken from finished product lot no. 1233393-005 are identical to each other but very different (>400 SNPs) as compared to the isolate from finished product lot no. 1233392-004. The two isolates from base powder are identical in sequence to the four isolates from finished product lot #1233393-005. None of the isolates were a genetic match to the NCBI strains listed in the table as well as in a more comprehensive search of all available genome sequences in NCBI.

Table 3

SNP analysisNCBI 1NCBI 2NCBI 3NCBI 41233393-005 A1233393-005 B1233393-005 C1233393-005 D1233392-0041233418-066 A1233418-066 B
NCBI 103138817641741841541783407415
NCBI 23130325372321322321321322314319
NCBI 388325019043343443143355422431
NCBI 41763721900475476474475185465473
1233393-005 A417321433475010042944
1233393-005 B418322434476101143055
1233393-005C415321431474010042744
1233393-005 D417321433475010042944
1233392-00483322551854294304274290418427
1233418-066 A407314422465454441800
1233418-066 B415319431473454442700

SNP analysis of C. botulinum isolates from finished product and base powder, compared against four whole genome sequences in NCBI.

NCBI 1, SRR2082799; NCBI 2, SRR24495897; NCBI 3, SRR35098139; NCBI 4, SRR35098172. 1233393-005A-D from finished product (NCBI SRR36912166, CFSAN145336, SRR36912165, SRR36912164); 1233392-004 from finished product (NCBI SRR3692272); 1233418-066 from base powder (NCBI SRR36912271). Less than 10 SNPs (genetically identical).

4 Discussion

The 2025 United States infant botulism outbreak, linked to a brand of infant formula with 51 cases reported at the time of this submission, is a watershed event. It shifts the risk assessment for C. botulinum in PIF from a theoretical hazard to one that is “reasonably likely to occur.” Currently, PIF and specific ingredients, such as dairy materials, are not subjected to pasteurization processes capable of delivering a 6-log reduction of heat-resistant C. botulinum spores.

Furthermore, testing for C. botulinum is extremely challenging, particularly with regards to culture confirmation. Real-time PCR screening of sample enrichments revealed that non-target clostridial species can be present at concentrations six orders of magnitude (106) higher than C. botulinum. This resulted in Cq values more than 20 cycles earlier than the target (data not shown). In this study, examining more than 1,500 colonies was required to find a single positive C. botulinum colony, highlighting the critical importance of molecular approaches for confirmation.

Following the outbreak and subsequent recall, several groups promoted SRC testing as a primary control measure. However, our evidence highlights significant risks in this approach. The recovery of C. botulinum from finished products – confirmed by real-time PCR and genomic analysis – demonstrates the limitations of indicator-based screening. Notably, these findings occurred in samples where SRC were not detected, indicating that SRC enumeration did not reliably correlate with the presence of toxigenic C. botulinum. Similar shortcomings of indicator organisms have been noted previously (Hauschild and Dodds, 1993; International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods (ICMSF), 2014).

This observation is consistent with the biological heterogeneity of the species; while sulfite reduction is common among clostridia, it is not a universal phenotype for all toxigenic C. botulinum strains. Phenotypic expression is heavily influenced by strain-specific traits and assay conditions (Lindström and Korkeala, 2006; Peck, 2009). Consequently, while SRC-based methods are useful for assessing general hygiene, they have inherent limitations as predictors of C. botulinum (International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods (ICMSF), 2014). These limitations may stem from high effective limits of detection (≤10 CFU/g) and inefficient spore germination or outgrowth on selective agar (Hauschild and Dodds, 1993).

While these constraints may be inconsequential in high-level contamination, they are critical at low levels observed here. Even low numbers of C. botulinum pose a significant risk to infants, who lack the established gut microbiota necessary to suppress colonization (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1998; Lindström and Korkeala, 2006; Harris and Dabritz, 2024). The tiered analytical approach employed in this study – combining anaerobic enrichment with molecular screening – enabled the identification of samples requiring further investigation and guided targeted isolation efforts. Real-time PCR provided a sensitive screening tool, while amplicon sequencing and WGS provided the specificity and resolution necessary to link the outbreak definitively to the product (ISO/TS 17919:2013, 2013; Lindström and Korkeala, 2006; U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 2025).

4.1 Implications for industry

At the time of writing, the root cause investigation remains ongoing to determine likely sources of C. botulinum entry into the supply chain. The 2025 infant botulism outbreak – with 51 cases reported by the CDC as of publication – represents the first outbreak linked to PIF in which C. botulinum was detected in unopened finished product containers. This outbreak fundamentally changes the standing assumptions in PIF manufacturing: that C. botulinum is not an organism of concern requiring specific preventative controls.

The most significant consequence of this outbreak for the PIF industry is that C. botulinum can no longer be classified an unforeseen hazard. This necessitates an immediate reassessment of hazard analysis across the industry. Furthermore, these results highlight a critical consideration for industry testing programs: enumeration of SRC should be interpreted strictly as an indicator of general anaerobic spore presence rather than a reliable surrogate for C. botulinum detection. Reliance on SRC results alone can lead to false-negative conclusions; the test lacks the necessary sensitivity or specificity to serve as a proxy for toxigenic C. botulinum.

Incorporation of targeted molecular screening for botulinum neurotoxin genes – particularly within a tiered testing framework for high-risk products like PIF – can significantly enhance detection sensitivity while maintaining alignment with modern preventive control principles. Such an approach supports earlier detection, more informed risk-management decisions, and improved confidence in food safety assessments involving C. botulinum.

Statements

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, NCBI 1 = SRR2082799; NCBI 2 = SRR24495897; NCBI 3 = SRR35098139; NCBI 4 = SRR35098172 1233393-005A-D (NCBI SRR36912166, CFSAN145336, SRR36912165, SRR36912164); 1233392-004 (NCBI SRR3692272); 1233418-066 (NCBI SRR36912271).

Ethics statement

This study focused exclusively on the detection and genomic characterization of Clostridium botulinum isolated from food matrices (powdered infant formula and base powder). No human clinical samples were collected or analyzed by the authors for this research; all data regarding the 2025 multistate outbreak were obtained from public health reports and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Author contributions

CN: Project administration, Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing – original draft. ET: Writing – review & editing. FF: Writing – review & editing, Supervision. YH: Writing – review & editing. SH: Writing – review & editing. AS: Writing – review & editing. JR: Writing – review & editing. SK: Writing – review & editing. JT: Writing – review & editing. J-YL: Writing – review & editing. MSp: Writing – review & editing. BB: Writing – review & editing. KC: Writing – review & editing. NM: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. MSa: Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Resources, Methodology, Project administration, Conceptualization, Supervision.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Conflict of interest

CN, ET, FF, YH, SH, AS, JR, SK, JT, J-YL, MSp, BB, KC, and MSa were employed by IEH Laboratories and Consulting Group. NM was employed by ByHeart.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1

    American Public Health Association (2015). Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods. 5th Edn. Washington (DC): APHA Press.

  • 2

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (1998). Botulism in the United States, 1899–1996: handbook for epidemiologists, clinicians, and laboratory workers. Atlanta, GA: CDC.

  • 3

    Codex Alimentarius Commission. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2008). RCP 66 - code of hygienic practice for powdered formulae for infants and young children. Available online at: https://www.fao.org/input/download/standards/11026/CXP_066e.pdf (Accessed December 22, 2025)

  • 4

    DoyleM. P.BuchananR. L. (2013). Food microbiology: fundamentals and frontiers. 4th Edn. Washington (DC): ASM Press.

  • 5

    HarrisR. A.DabritzH. A. (2024). Infant botulism: in search of Clostridium botulinum spores. Curr. Microbiol.81:306. doi: 10.1007/s00284-024-03828-0,

  • 6

    HauschildA. H. W.DoddsK. L. (1993). Clostridium botulinum: ecology and control in foods. Food Microbiol.10, 255269. doi: 10.1201/9781315139623

  • 7

    International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods (ICMSF). (2014). Usefulness of testing for Clostridium botulinum in powdered infant formula and dairy-based ingredients for infant formula. Available online at: https://www.icmsf.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/ICMSF_Infant_Formula_Testing_Revision1-20140117.pdf (Accessed December 22, 2025)

  • 8

    ISO 15213-1:2023 (2023). Microbiology of the food chain—horizontal method for the detection and enumeration of Clostridium spp.—part 1: enumeration of sulfite-reducing Clostridium spp. by colony-count technique. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.

  • 9

    ISO/TS 17919:2013 (2013). Microbiology of food and animal feed—polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of food-borne pathogens—detection of Clostridium botulinum. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.

  • 10

    Joint FAO/WHO Expert Meetings on Microbiological Risk Assessment (JEMRA). World Health Organization. (2004). Enterobacter sakazakii and other microorganisms in powdered infant formula: meeting report. Available online at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241562775 (Accessed December 22, 2025)

  • 11

    LindströmM.KorkealaH. (2006). Laboratory diagnostics of botulism. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.19, 298314. doi: 10.1128/CMR.19.2.298-314.2006,

  • 12

    PeckM. W. (2009). Biology and genomic analysis of Clostridium botulinum. Adv. Microb. Physiol.55, 183265. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2911(09)05503-9

  • 13

    PopoffM. R.BouvetP. (2013). Genetic characteristics of toxigenic Clostridia and toxin gene evolution. Toxicon75, 6389. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2013.05.003,

  • 14

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (2025). Bacteriological analytical manual (BAM), chapter 17: Clostridium botulinum. Silver Spring (MD): FDA.

Summary

Keywords

Clostridium botulinum, food safety, infant botulism, outbreak investigation, powdered infant formula (PIF), sulfite-reducing clostridia (SRC), whole-genome sequencing (WGS)

Citation

Nadala C, Themeli E, Forghani F, Ha Y, Han S, Shapovalova A, Roach J, Kim SH, Thorson JLM, Lee J-Y, Spear M, Buhrman B, Chiu K, Mullane N and Samadpour M (2026) Detection and characterization of Clostridium botulinum isolated from powdered infant formula. Front. Microbiol. 17:1800624. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2026.1800624

Received

31 January 2026

Revised

13 February 2026

Accepted

16 February 2026

Published

15 June 2026

Volume

17 - 2026

Edited by

Arun K. Bhunia, Purdue University, United States

Reviewed by

Theresa Smith, Northern Arizona University, United States

Richard Harris, Health Canada, Canada

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Mansour Samadpour,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics