AUTHOR=Contreras-Martos Sara , Nguyen Hung H. , Nguyen Phuong N. , Hristozova Nevena , Macossay-Castillo Mauricio , Kovacs Denes , Bekesi Angela , Oemig Jesper S. , Maes Dominique , Pauwels Kris , Tompa Peter , Lebrun Pierre 

TITLE=Quantification of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: A Problem Not Fully Appreciated

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences

VOLUME=Volume 5 - 2018

YEAR=2018

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/molecular-biosciences/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2018.00083

DOI=10.3389/fmolb.2018.00083

ISSN=2296-889X

ABSTRACT=Protein quantification is essential in a great variety of biochemical assays, yet the inherent systematic errors associated with the concentration determination of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) using classical methods are hardly appreciated. Routinely used assays for protein quantification, such as the Bradford assay or ultraviolet absorbance at 280 nm, usually seriously misestimate the concentrations of IDPs due to their distinct and variable amino acid composition. Therefore, dependable method(s) have to be worked out/adopted for this task. By comparison to elemental analysis as the gold standard, we show through the example of four globular proteins and nine IDPs that the ninhydrin assay and the commercial QubitTM Protein Assay provide reliable data on IDP quantity, but even these techniques are only recommended to use for IDPs following standardization. The far-reaching implications of this simple observation are demonstrated through two examples i) circular dichroism spectrum deconvolution, and ii) receptor-ligand affinity determination. These actual comparative examples illustrate the potential errors that can be incorporated into the biophysical parameters of IDPs, due to systematic misestimation of their concentration. This leads to inaccurate description of IDP functions.