AUTHOR=Zhou Mengni , Tian Cheng , Cao Rui , Wang Bin , Niu Yan , Hu Ting , Guo Hao , Xiang Jie 

TITLE=Epileptic Seizure Detection Based on EEG Signals and CNN

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Neuroinformatics

VOLUME=Volume 12 - 2018

YEAR=2018

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroinformatics/articles/10.3389/fninf.2018.00095

DOI=10.3389/fninf.2018.00095

ISSN=1662-5196

ABSTRACT=Epilepsy is a neurological disorder that affects approximately fifty million people according to the World Health Organization. While electroencephalography (EEG) plays an important role in monitoring the brain activities of epileptic patients and diagnosing epilepsy, an expert is needed to analyze all EEG recordings to detect epileptic activity. This method is obviously time-consuming and tedious, and a timely and accurate diagnosis of epilepsy is essential to initiate antiepileptic drug therapy and subsequently reduce the risk of future seizures and seizure-related complications. In this work, a convolutional neural network (CNN) based on raw EEG signals instead of manual feature extraction was used to distinguish ictal, preictal and interictal segments for epileptic seizure detection. To explore the potential of time and frequency domain signals, we compared their performances in the detection of epileptic signals based on the intracranial Freiburg and scalp CHB-MIT databases. Three types of experiments involving two binary classification problems (interictal vs. preictal, interictal vs. ictal) and one three-class problem (interictal vs. preictal vs. ictal) were conducted to explore the feasibility of this method. Using frequency domain signals in the Freiburg database, average accuracies of 96.7%, 95.4% and 94.3% were obtained for the three experiments, while the average accuracies for detection in the CHB-MIT database were 95.6%, 97.5% and 93% in the three experiments. Using time domain signals in the Freiburg database, the average accuracies were 91.1%, 83.8 and 85.1% in the three experiments, while the signal detection accuracies in the CHB-MIT database were only 59.5%, 62.3% and 47.9% in the three experiments. These results suggest that the three cases can be effectively detected using frequency domain signals. However, effectively identifying the three cases using time domain signals as input samples can be achieved for only some patients. On the whole, the classification accuracies of frequency domain signals are significantly increased compared to those of time domain signals. In addition, frequency domain signals have greater potential than time domain signals for CNN applications.