AUTHOR=Deng Baohua , Zheng Yangtai , Gao Yiyang , Zhuang Yafan , Ma Li , Cao Lihui 

TITLE=Evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of core biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid for Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Neurology

VOLUME=Volume 16 - 2025

YEAR=2025

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neurology/articles/10.3389/fneur.2025.1667402

DOI=10.3389/fneur.2025.1667402

ISSN=1664-2295

ABSTRACT=ObjectiveCore cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers serve as pivotal diagnostic indicators for Alzheimer’s disease, yet their diagnostic efficacy varies substantially across different markers. This study employs a Bayesian meta-analytic approach to comprehensively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of individual core CSF biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease (AD).MethodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted in Web of Science, PubMed, and other databases for English-language studies published between January 2013 and April 2025. Following predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria, eligible studies were selected for methodological quality assessment using standardized tools. Data extraction was subsequently performed, and statistical analyses were conducted using Meta-DiSc 1.4, Stata 15.1, and R 4.3.2 software packages.ResultsThis meta-analysis systematically evaluated the diagnostic value of eight core CSF biomarkers for AD, incorporating 23 eligible studies (2,187 AD cases and 2,019 non-AD). Key findings revealed: (1) Among individual biomarkers, p-tau217 demonstrated superior diagnostic performance, with sensitivity of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92–0.97), specificity of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88–0.98), area under the curve (AUC) of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.97–1.00), and an exceptionally high diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 395.28 (95% CI: 92.17–1,305.79), all parameters being significantly better than other biomarkers (p < 0.001). Both p-tau231 (AUC = 0.97) and p-tau181 (AUC = 0.90) also exhibited commendable diagnostic accuracy. (2) For biomarker ratios, the Aβ42/p-tau181 ratio showed optimal overall diagnostic efficacy, with sensitivity of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86–0.94) and AUC of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90–0.96), significantly outperforming other ratio combinations (p < 0.05).ConclusionThis study demonstrates that among core CSF biomarkers for AD, p-tau217 exhibits the most outstanding diagnostic performance as a standalone biomarker, while the Aβ42/p-tau181 ratio shows superior diagnostic efficacy among biomarker combinations. Based on current evidence-based medical data, we recommend the combined use of p-tau217 and Aβ42/p-tau181 ratio as first-line core CSF biomarker panel for AD diagnosis, providing reliable laboratory evidence for early screening and differential diagnosis of AD in clinical practice.