A New Pulse Coupled Neural Network (PCNN) for Brain Medical Image Fusion Empowered by Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm

Abstract

Recent research has reported the application of image fusion technologies in medical images in a wide range of aspects, such as in the diagnosis of brain diseases, the detection of glioma and the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. In our study, a new fusion method based on the combination of the shuffled frog leaping algorithm (SFLA) and the pulse coupled neural network (PCNN) is proposed for the fusion of SPECT and CT images to improve the quality of fused brain images. First, the intensity-hue-saturation (IHS) of a SPECT and CT image are decomposed using a non-subsampled contourlet transform (NSCT) independently, where both low-frequency and high-frequency images, using NSCT, are obtained. We then used the combined SFLA and PCNN to fuse the high-frequency sub-band images and low-frequency images. The SFLA is considered to optimize the PCNN network parameters. Finally, the fused image was produced from the reversed NSCT and reversed IHS transforms. We evaluated our algorithms against standard deviation (SD), mean gradient (Ḡ), spatial frequency (SF) and information entropy (E) using three different sets of brain images. The experimental results demonstrated the superior performance of the proposed fusion method to enhance both precision and spatial resolution significantly.

Introduction

In 1895 Rontgen obtained the first human medical image by X-ray, after which research of medical images gained momentum, laying the foundation for medical image fusion. With the development of both medical imaging technology and hardware facilities, a series of medical images with different characteristics and information were obtained, contributing to a key source of information for disease diagnosis. At present, clinical medical images mainly include Computed Tomography (CT) images, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) images, Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) images, Dynamic Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (DSPECT) and ultrasonic images, etc. (Jodoin et al., 2015; Hansen et al., 2017; Zhang J. et al., 2017). It is necessary to fuse different modes of medical images into more informative images based on fusion algorithms, in order to provide doctors with more reliable information during clinical diagnosis (Kavitha and Chellamuthu, 2014; Zeng et al., 2014). At present, medical image fusion has been considered in many aspects, such as the localization of brain diseases, the detection of glioma, the diagnosis of AD (Alzheimer’s disease), etc. (Huang, 1996; Singh et al., 2015; Zeng et al., 2018).

Image fusion is the synthesis of images into a new image using a specific algorithm. The space-time relativity and complementarity of information in fused images can be fully used in the process of image fusion, contributing to a more comprehensive expression of the scene (Wu et al., 2005; Choi, 2006). Conventional methods of SPECT and CT fusion images mainly include component substitution and multi-resolution analysis (Amolins et al., 2007; Huang and Du, 2008; Huang and Jiang, 2012). Component substitution mainly refers to intensity-hue-saturation (IHS) transform, with the advantage of improving the spatial resolution of SPECT images (Huang, 1999; Rahmani et al., 2010). The limitation of transform invariance leads to difficulty in extracting both image contour and edge details. In order to solve this problem, contourlet transform was proposed by Da et al. (2006), Zhao et al. (2012), Xin and Deng (2013). Moreover, non-subsampled contourlet transform (NSCT) was also proposed to fully extract the directional information of SPECT images and CT images to be fused, providing better performance in image decomposition (Da et al., 2006; Wang and Zhou, 2010; Yang et al., 2016).

The Pulse Coupled Neural Network (PCNN) was discovered by Eckhorn et al. (1989) in the 1990s while studying the imaging mechanisms of the visual cortex of small mammals. No training process is required in the PCNN and useful information can be obtained from a complex background through the PCNN. Nevertheless, the PCNN has its shortcomings, such as the numerous parameters and the complicated process of setting parameters. Thus, novel algorithms to optimize the PCNN parameters has been introduced to improve the calculation speed of PCNN (Huang, 2004; Huang et al., 2004; Jiang et al., 2014; Xiang et al., 2015). SFLA is a new heuristic algorithm first presented by Eusuff and Lansey, which combines the advantages of the memetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization. The algorithm can search and analyze the optimal value in a complex space with fewer parameters and has a higher performance and robustness (Samuel and Asir Rajan, 2015; Sapkheyli et al., 2015; Kaur and Mehta, 2017).

In our study, a new fusion approach based on the SFLA and PCNN is proposed to address the limitations discussed above. Our proposed method not only innovatively uses SFLA optimization to effectively learn the PCNN parameters, but also produces high quality fused images. A series of contrasting experiments are discussed in view of image quality and objective evaluations.

The remaining part of the paper is organized as follows. Related work is introduced in Section “Related Works.” The fusion method is proposed in Section “Materials and Methods.” The experimental results are presented in Sections “Result” and “Conclusion” concludes the paper with an outlook on future work.

Related Works

Image fusion involves a wide range of disciplines and can be classified under the category of information fusion, where a series of methods have been presented. A novel fusion method, for multi-scale images has been presented by Zhang X. et al. (2017) using Empirical Wavelet Transform (EWT). In the proposed method, simultaneous empirical wavelet transforms (SEWT) were used for one-dimensional and two-dimensional signals, to ensure the optimal wavelets for processed signals. A satisfying visual perception was achieved through a series of experiments and in terms of objective evaluations, it was demonstrated that the method was superior to other traditional algorithms. However, time consumption of the proposed method is high, mainly during the process of image decomposition, causing application difficulties in a real time system. Noised images should also be considered in future work where the process of generating optimal wavelets may be affected (Zeng et al., 2016b; Zhang X. et al., 2017).

Aishwarya and Thangammal (2017) also proposed a fusion method based on a supervised dictionary learning approach. During the dictionary training, in order to reduce the number of input patches, gradient information was first obtained for every patch in the training set. Second, both the information content and edge strength was measured for each gradient patch. Finally, the patches with better focus features were selected by a selection rule, to train the over complete dictionary. Additionally, in the process of fusion, the globally learned dictionary was used to achieve better visual quality. Nevertheless, high computational costs also exist in this proposed approach during the process of sparse coding and final fusion performance, which may be affected by high frequency noise (Zeng et al., 2016a; Aishwarya and Thangammal, 2017).

Moreover, an algorithm for the fusion of thermal and visual images was introduced by M Kanmani et al. in order to obtain a single comprehensive fused image. A novel method called self tuning particle swarm optimization (STPSO) was presented to calculate the optimal weights. A weighted averaging fusion rule was also used to fuse the low frequency- and high frequency coefficients, obtained through Dual Tree Discrete Wavelet Transform (DT-DWT) (Kanmani and Narasimhan, 2017; Zeng et al., 2017a). Xinxia Ji et al. proposed a new fusion algorithm based on an adaptive weighted method in combination with the idea of fuzzy theory. In the algorithm, a membership function with fuzzy logic variables were designed to achieve the transformation of different leveled coefficients by different weights. Experimental results indicated that the proposed algorithm outperformed existing algorithms in aspects of visual quality and objective measures (Ji and Zhang, 2017; Zeng et al., 2017b).

Materials and Methods

The Image Fusion Method Based on PCNN and SFLA

The algorithm 3.1 represents an image fusion algorithm based on the PCNN and SFLA, where SPECT and CT images are fused. In our proposed algorithm, a SPECT image is first decomposed on three components using IHS transform, which include saturation S, hue H and intensity I. Component I is then decomposed to a low-frequency and high-frequency image through NSCT decomposition. Additionally, a CT image is decomposed into a low-frequency and high-frequency image through NSCT decomposition. Moreover, the two low-frequency images obtained above are fused in a new low-frequency image through the SFLA and PCNN combination fusion rules, while the two high-frequency images obtained above are fused into a new high-frequency image through the SFLA and PCNN combination fusion rules. Next, the new low-frequency and new high-frequency images are fused to generate a new image with intensity I’ using reversed NSCT. Finally, the target image is achieved by using reversed IHS transform to integrate the three components S, H and I’.

The overall method of the proposed algorithm for the fusion of a SPECT and CT image is outlined in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1

Decomposition Rule

In our proposed method, the SPECT image and CT image are decomposed into a low-frequency and high-frequency image using NSCT.

Non-subsampled contourlet transform (Huang, 1999; Rahmani et al., 2010) is composed of a non-subsampled pyramid filter bank (NSPFB) and a non-subsampled directional filter bank (NSDFB). The source image is decomposed into a high-frequency sub-band and a low-frequency sub-band by NSPFB. The high-frequency sub-band is then decomposed into a sub-band of each direction by NSDFB. The structure diagram of the two-level decomposition of NSCT is shown in Figure 2.

FIGURE 2

An analysis filter {H₁ (z), H₂ (z)} and a synthesis filter {G₁ (z), G₂ (z)} are used when using NSCT to decompose images and the two filters satisfy H₁(z)G₁(z) + H₂(z)G₂(z) = 1. The source image can generate low-frequency and high-frequency sub-band images when it is decomposed by NSP. The next level of NSP decomposition is performed on low-frequency components obtained by the upper-level decomposition. An analysis filter {U₁ (z), U₂ (z)} and synthesis filters {V₁ (z), V₂ (z)} are contained in the design structure of NSDFB with the requirement of U₁(z)V ₁(z) + U₂(z)V ₂(z) = 1. The high-pass sub-band image decomposed by J-level NSP is decomposed by L-level NSDFB, and the high-frequency sub-band coefficients can be obtained at the number of 2ⁿ, where n is an integer higher than 0. A fused image with clearer contours and translation invariants can be obtained through the fusion method based on NSCT (Xin and Deng, 2013).

Fusion Rule

Fusion rules affect image performance, so the selection of fusion rules largely determines the quality of the final fused image. In this section, the PCNN fusion algorithm based on SFLA is introduced for low-frequency and high-frequency sub-band images decomposed by NSCT.

Pulse Coupled Neural Network

The PCNN is a neural network model of single-cortex feedback, to simulate the processing mechanism of visual signals in the cerebral cortex of cats. It consists of several neurons connected to each other, where each neuron is composed of three parts: the receiving domain, the coupled linking modulation domain and the pulse generator. In image fusion using the PCNN, the M ^∗ N neurons of a two-dimensional PCNN network correspond to the M ^∗ N pixels of the two-dimensional input image, and the gray value of the pixel is taken as the external stimulus of the network neuron. Initially, the internal activation of neurons is equal to the external stimulation. When the external stimulus is greater than the threshold value, a natural ignition will occur. When a neuron ignites, its threshold will increase sharply and then decay exponentially with time. When the threshold attenuates to less than the corresponding internal activation, the neuron will ignite again, and the neuron will generate a pulse sequence signal. The ignited neurons stimulate the ignition of adjacent neurons by interacting with adjacent neurons, thereby generating an automatic wave in the activation region to propagate outward (Ge et al., 2009).

The parameters of the PCNN affect the quality of image fusion, and most current research uses the method of regressively exploring the values of parameters, which is subjective to a certain degree. Therefore, how to reasonably set the parameters of the PCNN is the key to improving its performance. In our paper, SFLA is used to optimize the PCNN network parameters.

Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm

Shuffled frog leaping algorithm is a particle swarm search method based on groups to obtain optimal results. The flowchart of SFLA is shown in Figure 3. First, the population size F, the number of sub populations m, the maximum iterations of local search for each sub population N and the number of frogs in each sub population n were defined. Second, a population was initialed, and the fitness value of each frog was calculated and sorted in a descending order. A memetic algorithm is used in the process of the search, and the search is carried out in groups. All groups are then fused, and the frogs are sorted according to an established rule. Moreover, the frog population is divided based on the established rules, and the overall information exchange is achieved using this method until the number of iterations are equal to the maximum iterations N (Li et al., 2018).

FIGURE 3

F(x) is defined as a fitness function and Ω is a feasible domain. In each iteration, P_g is the best frog for a frog population, P_b represents the best frog for each group and P_w is the worst frog for each group. The algorithm adopts the following update strategy to carry out a local search in each group:

where S_j represents the updated value of frog leaping, rand () is defined as the random number between 0 and 1, S_max is described as the maximum leaping value, and P_w,new is the worst frog of updated group. If P_w,new ∈ Ω and F(P_w,new) > F(P_w), P_w can be replaced by P_w,new, otherwise, P_b will be replaced by P_g. At the same time, if P′_w,new ∈ Ω and F(P′_w,new) > F(P_w), P_w can be replaced by P′_w,new, otherwise P_w can be replaced by a new frog and then the process of iteration will continue until the maximum iterations is reached.

PCNN Fusion Algorithm Based on SFLA

Three parameters α_𝜃,β and V _𝜃 in PCNN are essential for the results of image fusion. Therefore, as it is shown in Figure 4, in our study, the SFLA is used to optimize the PCNN in order to achieve the optimal solution of the PCNN parameters. Each frog is defined as a spatial solution X(α_𝜃,β,V _𝜃) and the optimal configuration scheme of the PCNN parameters can finally be obtained by searching for the best frog X_b(α_𝜃,β,V _𝜃).

FIGURE 4

In our proposed method, possible configuration schemes of parameters are defined, which constitute a solution space for the parameter optimization. After generating an initial frog solution space, F frogs in the population are divided into m groups, and each group is dependent on one another. Starting from the initial solution, the frogs in each group first carry out an intraclass optimization by a local search, thereby continuously updating their own fitness values. In N iterations of local optimization, the quality of the whole frog population is optimized with the improvement of the quality of frogs in all groups. The frogs of the population are then fused and regrouped according to the established rule, and local optimization within the group is carried out until reaching the final iteration conditions. Finally, the global optimal solution of the frog population is defined as the optimal PCNN parameter configuration. The final fusion image is thus obtained using the optimal parameter configuration above.

Results

In order to verify the accuracy and preservation of the edge details in our proposed method, three sets of CT and SPECT images were fused based on our method. The results of each set were compared with four fusion methods; IHS, NSCT+FL, DWT, NSCT+PCNN. In the method of NSCT+FL, images are first decomposed by NSCT to obtain high-frequency and low-frequency coefficients, and then fusion images are obtained by taking large value high-frequency coefficients and taking average value low-frequency coefficients. In NSCT+PCNN, images are decomposed by NSCT and fused by the PCNN.

Subjective Evaluations of Experimental Results

Experiments were implemented on the image database from the Whole Brain Web Site of Harvard Medical School (Johnson and Becker, 2001) which contains two groups of images including CT and SPECT images. Each group has three examples including normal brain images, glioma brain images and brain images of patients diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease. The testing images have been used in many related papers (Du et al., 2016a,b,c) and the platform is MATLAB R2018a.

A series of fusion results of SPECT and CT images, based on different methods including IHS, NSCT+FL, DWT, NSCT+PCNN, and our proposed method is shown in Figure 5–7. The fusion results of a set of normal brain images are shown in Figure 5, the fusion results of a set of glioma brain images are presented in Figure 6, while a set of brain images of patients diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease are shown in Figure 7. In Figure 5–7, (a), (h) and (o) are source CT images; (b), (i), (p) are source SPECT images; (c), (j) and (q) are fused images based on IHS; (d), (k) and (r) are fused images based on NSCT+FL; (e), (l) and (s) are fused images based on DWT; (f), (m) and (t) are fused images based on the combination of NSCT+PCNN; (g), (n) and (u) are fused images based on the proposed method. It can be seen that the fusion results based on our proposed method are more accurate and clearer than those based on various other methods. Our proposed method contributes to a higher brightness of fusion images and more information on the edge details.

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 6

FIGURE 7

Objective Evaluations of Experimental Results

A set of metrics is used to compare the performance of the fusion methods including IHS, DWT, NSCT, PCNN, a combination of NSCT and the PCNN, and our proposed method. The evaluation metrics including standard deviation (SD), mean gradient (Ḡ), spatial frequency (SF) and information entropy (E) are entailed as follows (Huang et al., 2018):

• (1)

  Standard deviation

• Standard deviation is used to evaluate the contrast of the fused image, which is defined as

• where Z(i,j) represents the pixel value of the fused image and is the mean value of the pixel values of the image.

• The SD reflects the discrete image gray scale relative to the mean value of gray scale. And a higher value of SD demonstrates the performance of a fused image.

• (2)

  Mean gradient (Ḡ)

• Ḡ corresponds to the ability of a fused image to represent the contrast of tiny details sensitively. It can be mathematically described as

• The fused image is clearer when the value of mean gradient is higher.

• (3)

  Spatial frequency (SF)

• Spatial frequency is the measure of the overall activity in a fused image. For an image with a gray value Z(x_i,y_j) at position (x_i,y_j), the spatial frequency is defined as

• Where row frequency

• Column frequency

• The higher the value of frequency, the better the fused image quality.

• (4)

  Information entropy (E)

• Information entropy is provided by the below equation

• where L is image gray scale and Pi is the proportion of the pixel of the gray value i in whole pixels. A higher value of entropy indicates more information contained in the fused image.

Experiment results on fused images of SPECT images and CT images are shown in Tables 1–3. The fusion results of a set of normal brain images are shown in Table 1, the fusion results of a set of glioma brain images are presented in Table 2, while a set of brain images of patients diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease are shown Table 3. It can be seen that compared to other fusion methods, our proposed method generally has higher values in SD, Ḡ, SF and E. The experimental results demonstrate that information of fusion images obtained by our proposed method is more abundant, the inheritance of detail information performs better, while the resolution is significantly improved.

Conclusion

In this paper, a new fusion method for SPECT brain and CT brain images was put forward. First, NSCT was used to decompose the IHS transform of a SPECT and CT image. The fusion rules, based on the regional average energy, was then used for low-frequency coefficients and the combination of SFLA and the PCNN was used for high-frequency sub-bands. Finally, the fused image was produced by reversed NSCT and reversed IHS transform. Both subjective evaluations and objective evaluations were used to analyze the quality of the fused images. The results demonstrated that the method we put forward can retain the information of source images better and reveal more details in integration. It can be seen that the proposed method is valid and effective in achieving satisfactory fusion results, leading to a wide range of applications in practice.

The paper focuses on multi-mode medical image fusion. However, there is a negative correlation between the real-time processing speed and the effectiveness of medical image fusion. Under the premise of ensuring the quality of fusion results, how to improve the efficiency of the method should be considered in the future.

References

• 1

  AishwaryaN.ThangammalC. B. (2017). An image fusion framework using novel dictionary based sparse representation.Multimed. Tools Appl.7621869–21888. 10.1007/s11042-016-4030-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  AmolinsK.ZhangY.DareP. (2007). Wavelet based image fusion techniques- an introduction, review and comparison.ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens.62249–263. 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2007.05.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  ChoiM. (2006). A new intensity-hue-saturation fusion approach to image fusion with a tradeoff parameter.IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.441672–1682. 10.1109/TGRS.2006.869923

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  DaC.ZhouJ.DoM. (2006). “The non-subsampled contourlet transform: theory, design, and applications,” inProceedings of the IEEE Transaction on Image ProcessingVol. 15 (Piscataway, NJ: IEEE) 3089–3101. 10.1109/TIP.2006.877507

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  DuJ.LiW.XiaoB.NawazQ. (2016a). An overview of multi-modal medical image fusion.Knowl. Based Syst.2153–20.

  • Google Scholar

• 6

  DuJ.LiW.XiaoB.NawazQ. (2016b). Medical image fusion by combining parallel features on multi-scale local extrema scheme.Knowl. Based Syst.1134–12. 10.1016/j.knosys.2016.09.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  DuJ.LiW.XiaoB.NawazQ. (2016c). Union Laplacian pyramid with multiple features for medical image fusion.Neurocomputing194326–339. 10.1016/j.neucom.2016.02.047

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  EckhornR.ReitboeckH. J.ArndtM.DickeP. (1989). “A neural network for feature linking via synchronous activity: results from cat visual cortex and from simulations,” inModels of Brain Functioned.CotterillR. M. J. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 255–272. 10.1139/w00-039

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  GeJ.WangY.ZhangH.ZhouB. (2009). Study of intelligent inspection machine based on modified pulse coupled neural network.Chin. J. Sci. Instrum.301866–1873.

  • Google Scholar

• 10

  HansenN. L.KooB. C.GallagherF. A.WarrenA. Y.DobleA.GnanapragasamV.et al (2017). Comparison of initial and tertiary centre second opinion reads of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate prior to repeat biopsy.Eur. Radiol.272259–2266. 10.1007/s00330-016-4635-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  HuangC.XieY.LanY.HaoY.ChenF.ChengY.et al (2018). A new framework for the integrative analytics of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography images.IEEE Access636408–36419. 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2839694

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  HuangD. (1999). Radial basis probabilistic neural networks: model and application.Int. J. Pattern Recogn.131083–1101. 10.1109/LGRS.2010.2046715

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  HuangD. (2004). A constructive approach for finding arbitrary roots of polynomials by neural networks.IEEE Trans. Neural Netw.15477–491. 10.1109/TNN.2004.824424

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  HuangD.DuJ. (2008). A constructive hybrid structure optimization methodology for radial basis probabilistic neural networks.IEEE Trans. Neural Netw.192099–2115. 10.1109/TNN.2008.2004370

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  HuangD.HoraceH.ChiZ. (2004). A neural root finder of polynomials based on root moments.Neural Comput.161721–1762. 10.1162/089976604774201668

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  HuangD.JiangW. (2012). A general CPL-AdS methodology for fixing dynamic parameters in dual environments.IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. B Cybern.421489–1500. 10.1109/TSMCB.2012.2192475

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17

  HuangS. (1996). Systematic Theory of Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition (in Chinese).Beijing: Publishing House of Electronic Industry of China.

  • Google Scholar

• 18

  JiX.ZhangG. (2017). Image fusion method of SAR and infrared image based on Curvelet transform with adaptive weighting.Multimed. Tools Appl.7617633–17649. 10.1007/s11042-016-4030-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  JiangP.ZhangQ.LiJ.ZhangJ. (2014). Fusion algorithm for infrared and visible image based on NSST and adaptive PCNN.Laser Infrared44108–113.

  • Google Scholar

• 20

  JodoinP. M.PinheiroF.OudotA.LalandeA. (2015). Left-ventricle segmentation of SPECT images of rats.IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.52260–2268. 10.1109/TBME.2015.2422263

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  JohnsonK. A.BeckerJ. A. (2001). The Whole Brain Altas.Available at: http://www.med.harvard.edu/aanlib/

  • Google Scholar

• 22

  KanmaniM.NarasimhanV. (2017). An optimal weighted averaging fusion strategy for thermal and visible images using dual tree discrete wavelet transform and self tunning particle swarm optimization.Multimed. Tools Appl.7620989–21010. 10.1007/s11042-016-4030-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  KaurP.MehtaS. (2017). Resource provisioning and work flow scheduling in clouds using augmented shuffled frog leaping algorithm.J. Parallel Distrib. Comput.10141–50. 10.1016/j.jpdc.2016.11.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  KavithaC. T.ChellamuthuC. (2014). Fusion of SPECT and MRI images using integer wavelet transform in combination with curvelet transform.Imaging Sci. J.6317–24. 10.1179/1743131X14Y.0000000092

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  LiR.JiC.SunP.LiuD.ZhangP.LiJ. (2018). Optimizing operation of cascade reservoirs based on improved shuffled frog leaping algorithm.J. Yangtze River Sci. Res. Inst.3530–35.

  • Google Scholar

• 26

  RahmaniS.StraitM.MerkurjevD.MoellerM.WittmanT. (2010). An adaptive IHS pan-sharpening method.IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett.7746–750. 10.1109/LGRS.2010.2046715

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  SamuelG. C.Asir RajanC. C. (2015). Hybrid: particle swarm optimization-genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization-shuffled frog leaping algorithm for long-term generator maintenance scheduling.Int. J. Elec. Power65432–442. 10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.10.042

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  SapkheyliA.ZainA. M.SharifS. (2015). The role of basic, modified and hybrid shuffled frog leaping algorithm on optimization problems: a review.Soft Comput.192011–2038. 10.1007/s00500-014-1388-4

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  SinghS.GuptaD.AnandR. S.KumarV. (2015). Nonsubsampled shearlet based CT and MRI medical image fusion using biologically inspired spiking neural network.Biomed. Signal Process. Control1891–101. 10.1016/j.bspc.2014.11.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  WangD.ZhouJ. (2010). Image fusion algorithm based on the nonsubsampled contourlet transform.Comput. Syst. Appl.19220–224. 10.1109/ICFCC.2010.5497801

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  WuJ.HuangH.QiuY.WuH.TianJ.LiuJ. (2005). “Remote sensing image fusion based on average gradient of wavelet transform,” inProccedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and AutomationVol. 4 (Niagara Falls, ON: IEEE) 1817–1821. 10.1109/ICMA.2005.1626836

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  XiangT.YanL.GaoR. (2015). A fusion algorithm for infrared and visible images based on adaptive dual-channel unit-linking PCNN in NSCT domain.Infrared Phys. Technol.6953–61. 10.1016/j.infrared.2015.01.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  XinY.DengL. (2013). An improved remote sensing image fusion method based on wavelet transform.Laser Optoelectron. Prog.15133–138.

  • Google Scholar

• 34

  YangJ.WuY.WangY.XiongY. (2016). “A novel fusion technique for CT and MRI medical image based on NSST,” inProccedings of the Chinese Control and Decision Conference (Yinchuan: IEEE) 4367–4372. 10.1109/CCDC.2016.7531752

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  ZengN.QiuH.WangZ.LiuW.ZhangH.LiY. (2018). A new switching-delayed-PSO-based optimized SVM algorithm for diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease.Neurocomputing320195–202. 10.1016/j.neucom.2018.09.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  ZengN.WangH.LiuW.LiangJ.AlsaadiF. E. (2017a). A switching delayed PSO optimized extreme learning machine for short-term load forecasting.Neurocomputing240175–182. 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.01.090

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  ZengN.ZhangH.LiY.LiangJ.DobaieA. M. (2017b). Denoising and deblurring gold immunochromatographic strip images via gradient projection algorithms.Neurocomputing247165–172. 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.03.056

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  ZengN.WangZ.ZhangH. (2016a). Inferring nonlinear lateral flow immunoassay state-space models via an unscented Kalman filter.Sci. China Inform. Sci.59:112204. 10.1007/s11432-016-0280-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  ZengN.WangZ.ZhangH.AlsaadiF. E. (2016b). A novel switching delayed PSO algorithm for estimating unknown parameters of lateral flow immunoassay.Cogn. Comput.8143–152. 10.1007/s12559-016-9396-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  ZengN.WangZ.ZineddinB.LiY.DuM.XiaoL.et al (2014). Image-based quantitative analysis of gold immunochromato graphic strip via cellular neural network approach.IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging331129–1136. 10.1109/TMI.2014.2305394

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  ZhangJ.SunY.ZhangY.TengJ. (2017). Double regularization medical CT image blind restoration reconstruction based on proximal alternating direction method of multipliers.EURASIP J. Image Video Process.2017:70. 10.1186/s13640-017-0218-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  ZhangX.LiX.FengY. (2017). Image fusion based on simultaneous empirical wavelet transform.Multimed. Tools Appl.768175–8193. 10.1007/s11042-016-4030-x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  ZhaoQ.HeL.WenP. (2012). Image fusion method based on average grads and wavelet contrast.Comput. Eng. Appl.48165–168. 10.3778/j.issn.1002-8331.2012.24.037

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar