AUTHOR=Pantazatos Spiro P. , Schmidt Mike F. 

TITLE=Toward Establishing Internal Validity for Correlated Gene Expression Measures in Imaging Genomics of Functional Networks: Why Distance Corrections and External Face Validity Alone Fall Short. Reply to “Distance Is Not Everything in Imaging Genomics of Functional Networks: Reply to a Commentary on Correlated Gene Expression Supports Synchronous Activity in Brain Networks”

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Neuroscience

VOLUME=Volume 14 - 2020

YEAR=2020

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2020.00433

DOI=10.3389/fnins.2020.00433

ISSN=1662-453X

ABSTRACT=The primary claim of the Richiardi et. al. 2015 Science article1 is that a measure of correlated gene expression, significant strength fraction (SSF), is related to resting state fMRI (rsfMRI) networks. However, there is still debate about this claim and whether spatial proximity, in the form of contiguous clusters, accounts entirely, or only partially, for SSF2,3. Here, thirteen distributed networks were simulated by combining 34 contiguous clusters randomly placed throughout cortex, with resulting edge distance distributions similar to rsfMRI networks. Cluster size was modulated (6-15mm radius) to test its influence on SSF false positive rate (SSF-FPR) among simulated ‘noise’ networks. The contribution of rsfMRI networks on SSF-FPR was examined by comparing simulations using: 1) all cortical samples 2) all samples with non-rsfMRI cluster centers and 3) only non-rsfMRI samples.  Results show that SSF-FPR was influenced only by cluster size (r>0.9, p<0.001), not by rsfMRI samples. Simulations using 14mm radius clusters most resembled rsfMRI networks. When thresholding at p<10-4, the SSF-FPR was 0.47. Features that maximize SF have high global spatial autocorrelation. In conclusion, SSF is unrelated to rsfMRI networks. The main conclusion of Richiardi et. al. 2015 is based on a finding that is ~50% likely to be a false positive, not less than 0.01% as originally reported in the article1. We discuss why distance corrections alone and external face validity are insufficient to establish a trustworthy relationship between correlated gene expression measures and rsfMRI networks, and propose more rigorous approaches to preclude common pitfalls in related studies.