AUTHOR=Schmitt Tina , Rieger Jochem W. 

TITLE=Recommendations of Choice of Head Coil and Prescan Normalize Filter Depend on Region of Interest and Task

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Neuroscience

VOLUME=Volume 15 - 2021

YEAR=2021

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2021.735290

DOI=10.3389/fnins.2021.735290

ISSN=1662-453X

ABSTRACT=The performance of MRI head coils together with the influence of the prescan normalize filter in different brain regions was evaluated. Functional and structural data were recorded from 26 participants performing a motor, an auditory, and a visual task in different conditions: with the 20- and the 64-channel Siemens head/neck coil and the prescan normalize filter turned ON or OFF. Data were analyzed with the MRIQC tool to evaluate data quality differences. The functional data were statistically evaluated by comparison of the β estimates and the time-course SNR in four regions of interest, i.e., the auditory, the visual, the motor cortex and the thalamus. The MRIQC tool indicated a better data quality for both functional and structural data with the prescan normalize filter, with an advantage for the 20-channel head coil in functional and an advantage for the 64-channel head coil in structural measurements. Nevertheless, recommendations for the functional data regarding choice of head coils and prescan normalize filter depend on the brain regions of interest. Higher β estimates and tSNR values occurred in the auditory cortex and thalamus with the prescan normalize filter, whereas the contrary was true for the visual and the motor cortex. Due to higher β estimates in the visual cortex in the 64-channel head coil, this head coil is recommended for studies investigating the visual cortex. For most of the research questions the 20-channel is better suited for functional experiments, with the prescan normalize filter, especially when investigating deep brain areas. For anatomical studies, the 64-channel head coil seemed to be the better choice.