Abstract
Adult neurogenesis (AN) can be defined as the birth and development of new neurons in adulthood. Until the 1990s, AN was deemed not to happen after birth. Gradually, several groups demonstrated that specific zones of the brain of various species had a neurogenic potential. AN could be the key to treating a large range of neurodegenerative, neuropsychiatric, and metabolic diseases, with a better understanding of the mechanisms allowing for regeneration of new neurons. Despite this promising prospect, the existence of AN has not been validated in vivo in humans and therefore remains controversial. Moreover, the weight of AN-induced plasticity against other mechanisms of brain plasticity is not known, adding to the controversy. In this review, we would like to show that recent technical advances in brain MR imaging methods combined with improved models can resolve the debate.
Introduction
During the twentieth century, the prevalent dogma was that there was no generation of new neurons after birth. Then, gradually, different studies showed that adult neurogenesis (AN) induced plasticity in some specific regions of the brain of various species including humans. Changes occurred following learning, exercise, environmental enrichment, or stress. If validated, AN could have enormous implications for human health (Gage, ).
Despite more than 3 decades of research, the impact of AN on human health remains controversial because the in-vivo functional and metabolic roles of AN have not been established prompting to the non-existence of AN in the brain of adult humans (Sorrells et al., 2018). In their review of the current status of research on AN based on two opposite views on the existence of AN in the human brain, Kempermann et al. () clearly pointed at “a clear need for additional ways to study the generation of new neurons in adult humans” and concluded against “the categorical claim that there is no AN in the human hippocampus” owing to the development of more quantitative analyses and in vivo methods. Here, we argue that there exists an arsenal of quantitative neuroimaging tools, which could be used efficiently to validate the presence or not of AN in the brain of adult humans. The aim of this mini review is not to review once more the history of AN, as this has been conducted on many occasions (Kuhn et al., ; Toda and Gage, 2018; Fares et al., ). In this review, we propose to discuss the wealth of existing quantitative magnetic resonance methodologies, which could be very efficient in detecting AN in vivo. Moreover, we suggest that the combination of these structural, functional, and metabolic quantitative MR techniques and their translational nature may help the validating procedure of AN in the human brain.
A definition of adult neurogenesis
AN is the process by which new neurons are generated from neuronal stem cells in adults. This process involves the development of neural stem cells into progenitor cells their proliferation, differentiation, migration, and integration into existing neurons, and finally their maturation. It happens essentially during some activities such as exercise. Three major neurogenic niches have been identified in various species: the subgranular zone (SGZ), the subventricular zone (SVZ) of the hippocampus, and the olfactory bulb (Jurkowski et al., ). In addition, other areas of the brain have shown some neurogenic potential such as the striatum (Ernst et al., ) and the hypothalamus (Migaud et al., 2015).
The existence of AN in the human brain remains controversial
AN has mainly been evaluated and validated using invasive and/or post-mortem methodologies. Among them, traditional immunohistochemical methods have been used in many animal models such as fish, frogs, birds, hamsters, rodents, monkeys, and sheep and the post-mortem human brain. Notably, bromodeoxyuredine (BrdU) was extensively used in the late 1990s to demonstrate the presence of AN in post-mortem SVZ brain samples of patients with cancer (Eriksson et al., ).
The ability of invasive methodologies to detect and quantify the presence of AN depends on the stage of the neurogenic process as well as the species on which they were tested. Numerous studies have been performed in the rodent brain, which is unfortunately not a representative model owing to important genetic differences and variations in cell type, cell growth, brain size, and development time to adulthood. The time to adulthood constitutes one of the main arguments against the existence of AN in the human brain, with studies showing a significant drop in the generation of new neurons in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus of humans during the first years of life. Thus the conclusion to that AN at adulthood in humans does not exist (Sorrells et al., 2018). Despite these results, earlier 14C dating had demonstrated the existence of AN into the fifth decade of life in the human hippocampus (Spalding et al., 2013) but not in the olfactory bulb (Bergmann et al., ). Interestingly, these findings hinted at other mechanisms of brain plasticity in large brains such as different cytoarchitectural organizations of neurogenic niches and different migration paths compared to rodents. Notably, the capacity of astrocytes to act as neuronal stem cells (NSCs) was shown. It can therefore be envisaged that specific cell populations might be dependent on specific types of brain activities and mechanisms or disruptions of brain activities necessitating different sensitivities of detection techniques as well as new biomarkers.
AN has been mainly investigated with immunohistochemical methods and in post-mortem samples
The development of newborn neurons from NSCs until they integrate either the hippocampal or the hypothalamic circuitry passes through multiple development stages, each of which depends on the expression of specific protein markers described in-depth in many articles (Kuhn et al., ). AN has therefore a time-dependent and functional development, which is difficult to observe longitudinally by immunohistochemical studies. Thus, glial fibrillary acidic proteins (GFAPs), Nestin, Sox2, and bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU), which has been widely used to detect the presence of neurogenesis and represents the gold standard for validating the existence of AN, are often used to recognize proliferation stages. Doublecortin (DCX) is used as a marker of differentiation and/or migration. Finally, calretinin, Neun, and calbindin expressions can be useful for detection of new neurons and their integration to local circuitry (Kozareva et al., ).
Despite their repeated usage to demonstrate proliferation, differentiation, or migration of cells in AN, many immunohistochemical markers present confounding effects. For example, BrdU labeling performance depends on the status of the blood brain barrier or can label phenomena other than proliferation (Sierra et al., 2011). The specificity of DCX as a marker of AN has also been challenged (Sierra et al., 2011), while the expression of other antibodies and markers of proliferation must be performed with care since non-neurogenic cells may also be labeled.
An existing panel of in vivo MRI techniques
To establish the existence of AN in vivo and demonstrate its impact on human health, it is necessary to perform non-invasive in vivo neuroimaging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is, by far, one of the most translatable imaging techniques currently available for estimation of non-invasive biomarkers of development and progression of diseases and for investigation of responses to treatment in various species. MRI offers a large panel of qualitative, semi-quantitative, and quantitative parameters for visualization and understanding of both healthy and pathological features.
For the past 20 years, crucial technological developments of MRI machines have permitted important advances of structural, functional, and metabolic imaging methods that are now widely used in both experimental and clinical settings. As a matter of fact, a wide range of identical imaging sequences [for dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE), dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI, for diffusion tensor (DTI) MRI, for blood oxygen level-dependent functional MRI (BOLD fMRI), for perfusion MRI etc.] exists for small animals and for humans, while more and more animal-dedicated scanners propose similar hardware and software functionalities. Moreover, subsequent image analysis of animal or human scans often uses identical platforms, although programs need to be adapted.
Of course, direct detection of AN in vivo necessitates acquisition of images at cellular resolution. With conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques, the in vivo in plane spatial resolution is rarely below 100 μm2. Direct detection of AN is therefore difficult with MR techniques, and many studies mention possible effects of AN without demonstrating its presence. In Table 1, we enumerated studies using MR techniques to evaluate the presence in or effects of AN on both animals and humans. This summary is not exhaustive but demonstrates the lack of direct in vivo MR studies on AN.
Table 1
| MR technique | Publications | Species |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews | Ho et al. (). In vivo imaging of adult human hippocampal neurogenesis: progress, pitfalls and promise. | Mainly humans |
| Couillard-Despres and Aigner (). In vivo imaging of adult neurogenesis. | Rodents | |
| Couillard-Despres et al. (). In vivo monitoring of adult neurogenesis in health and disease. | Rodents | |
| Lucassen et al. (). Adult neurogenesis, human after all (again): Classic, optimized, and future approaches. | ||
| Structural MRI/VBM | Franklin et al. (). A VBM study demonstrating 'apparent' effects of a single dose of medication on T1-weighted MRIs. | Humans |
| Killgore et al. (). Physical exercise habits correlate with gray matter volume of the hippocampus in healthy adult humans. | Humans | |
| Pajkert et al. (2020). Early volumetric changes of hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex following medial temporal lobe resection. | Humans | |
| Sasaki et al. (2015). Specific regions display altered gray matter volume in μ-opioid receptor knockout mice: MRI voxel-based morphometry. | Mice | |
| BOLD fMRI/ | Gao et al. (). Blockade of Indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase 1 ameliorates hippocampal neurogenesis and BOLD-fMRI signals in chronic stress precipitated depression. | Rodents |
| Resting-State fMRI | van der Marel et al. (2015). Effects of long-term methylphenidate treatment in adolescent and adult rats on hippocampal shape, functional connectivity and adult neurogenesis. | Rodents |
| Chevillard et al. (). Hypercapnic challenge, BOLD fMRI and immunohistochemistry to examine the in-vivo presence of adult neurogenesis in the sheep hypothalamus. | Sheep | |
| CBV-CBF | Pereira et al. (2007). An in vivo correlate of exercise-induced neurogenesis in the adult dentate gyrus. | Humans and rodents |
| Taupin (2009). Magnetic resonance imaging for monitoring neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus. | Humans and rodents | |
| Diffusion MRI | Sierra et al. (2015). Imaging microstructural damage and plasticity in the hippocampus during epileptogenesis. | Rodents |
| Pérès et al. (2018). Longitudinal Study of Irradiation-Induced Brain Microstructural Alterations With S-Index, a Diffusion MRI Biomarker, and MR Spectroscopy. | Rodents | |
| Treit et al. (2018). High resolution in-vivo diffusion imaging of the human hippocampus. | Humans | |
| Rutland et al. (2019). Hippocampal subfield-specific connectivity findings in major depressive disorder: A 7 Tesla diffusion MRI study. | ||
| Bálentová et al. (). Effect of whole-brain irradiation on the specific brain regions in a rat model: Metabolic and histopathological changes. | Rodents | |
| MRS | Zhang et al. (2017). NSCs promote hippocampal neurogenesis, metabolic changes and synaptogenesis in APP/PS1 transgenic mice. | Rodents |
| Just et al. (). Photoperiodic Regulation of hypothalamic metabolism: a preliminary single voxel Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy investigation at 3T. | Sheep | |
| Manganas et al. (2007). Magnetic resonance spectroscopy identifies neural progenitor cells in the live human brain. | Rodents and Humans |
MR publications on adult neurogenesis.
A wide range of MR techniques has been developed for the past 30 years, allowing for characterization and relative or absolute quantification of biomarkers or surrogate markers of various structural, functional, or even metabolic changes occurring in the brain in vivo. Among them, vascular markers such as cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) have been used as potential surrogate markers of AN both in the rodent and human hippocampi after prolonged exercise (Pereira et al., 2007). Thus, despite the lack of high-resolution images, the impact of AN on brain physiology is measurable and quantifiable in a translational fashion by MRI. Moreover, MR measurements can be repeated longitudinally on same subjects across years. Many other MR techniques can be used to probe the presence of AN [blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) functional MRI, diffusion MRI, or MR spectroscopy (MRS)] but have been scarcely used in this context (Table 1). Unfortunately, to date, most studies remain correlative, where MR parameters are correlated to BrdU or DCX labeling to prove the existence and impact of AN. Disentangling the effects of AN on MR parameters from other effects (i.e., exercise and disease) remains challenging. In addition, AN may consist of generation of only a few cells to which MR parameter changes may not be sensitive.
Animal models
Rodent models are widely used in MRI owing to their wide availability, including transgenic models, as well as their flexibility, homogeneity, ease of use for preclinical imaging studies and the important knowledge accumulated over the years on them. They provide an important source of valuable knowledge on human disease allowing cross-correlations of MRI with cellular and molecular parameters and thus bring insights into the underlying mechanisms of various disorders. Nevertheless, their physiology, their behavior, and their development from birth to adulthood within a few months as opposed to several years in the human, do not always make valid models of them. The results obtained on their lissencephalic brain are difficult to transpose to humans and, the lack of specific features or symptoms, especially in mental disorders (in schizophrenia, autism) make them irrelevant for pharmaco-therapeutic challenges. In terms of MRI, the differences in spatial and temporal resolutions can be difficult to transpose to the humans in the clinical setting despite the use of higher magnetic field strengths for research only purposes. Finally, physiological and behavioral responses to anesthesia in rodents may differ substantially from the humans, which nevertheless are rarely anesthetized for routine MRI scanning.
On the other hand, non-human primates (NHPs) are considered the most relevant animal model for translational purposes, being the closest animal models to humans regarding their genetic background, physiology, and behavior. Most often, they are considered as the last criterion for establishing the efficacy of a drug before transition to humans. However, recent studies have also provided evidence that NHP models have also provided disappointing contributions to medical advancements. Moreover, ethical issues such as suffering and deaths of NHPs in biomedical research are frequently raised. The validity of some studies regarding cognition and behavior assessments of captive NHPs has also been questioned.
Despite the ethical issues mentioned previously, establishment of relevant NHP models of various diseases in combination with non-invasive MRI techniques is a growing area of research holding great promises for development and assessment of various therapeutic protocols. Moreover, MRI investigation of NHPs can be useful to validate the characterization of deeper brain structures and specific nuclei (Zitella et al., 2015) including in routinely used clinical scanners at a field strength of 3T and using whole-body MR features such as parallel imaging further enforcing the usefulness of NHPs for translational research (Li and Zhang, ). In addition, NHP models can be used effectively to investigate neural circuitry with cutting-edge technologies such as optogenetics (Senova et al., 2018), which that can be coupled with MRI techniques to identify specific anatomical targets for further stimulation therapy.
In between rodent and NHP animal models, there exists a wide range of other animal models that already showed an interesting potential for translational biomedical research. This is the case of the ovine model, which can be an interesting alternative to NHPs for MRI techniques (Ella et al., ; Just et al., ).
Sheep have reproducibly demonstrated AN in the hypothalamus (Migaud et al., 2015; Butruille et al., ). Compared to other species with a gyrencephalic brain, sheep are sensitive to photoperiod. The photoperiod represents the ratio of day to night length, which regulates the reproduction cycle of this species (Malpaux et al., 2001). BrdU and DCX staining of the median eminence and arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus in sheep showed that AN occurs during the shortest days of the year (from the end of September to the start of January) corresponding as well to the period of reproduction. Figure 1B shows a photomicrograph example of DCX-positive staining in the arcuate nucleus of the sheep hypothalamus followed by drawings showing variations in DCX+ staining during photoperiod (Figures 1C,D) (Migaud et al., 2015; Chevillard et al., ). In these animals, AN can be seen as a naturally occurring phenomenon, which confers an increased interest to this animal model in addition to their gyrencephalic brain, extended time to adulthood (3–4 years after birth), and possibility to be examined under similar conditions with identical imaging sequences to humans in clinical MR scanners (Just et al., ).
Figure 1
Multi-MR techniques for in vivo detection of AN in the sheep brain
AN is a dynamic process involving multiple structural, vascular, functional, and metabolic changes across time. Interestingly, several MR techniques are designed to probe these changes. Unfortunately, only hypotheses on their potential role on the detection of AN have been emitted.
Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and adult neurogenesis
In VBM, high-resolution structural volumes of the brain are compared statistically to draw conclusions on differences in brain regions between groups. Preliminary examples of a VBM analysis (Figure 2) conducted from segmentation of MPRAGE images of the sheep brain (Figure 2B) show significant structural changes occurring during the short days of the year (SP, short period) during AN compared to the long days of the year (LP, long period). We expected changes to arise from the arcuate nucleus and the median eminence of the hypothalamus (Figure 2C; The Sheep Brain Atlas, Michigan State University) due to ongoing AN. Several studies demonstrated that VBM could be advantageous for the analysis of the human brain in health and disease but the nature of the cellular changes underlying the signal of structural images has often been speculated to come from AN, endothelial cell or glial cell proliferation as well as changes in dendritic spine density but rarely probed for these effects. For example, Killgore et al. () correlated total minutes of weekly exercise to changes in hippocampal volume evaluated with VBM. They associated their findings to AN. Franklin et al. (), on the other hand, showed that vascular effects could easily confound VBM findings in the hippocampus demonstrating that changes in neural mechanisms should always be tested to confirm that they could be the source of structural changes.
Figure 2
Blood oxygen level-dependent fMRI, perfusion MRI, and other functional MR techniques
The BOLD signal represents one of the acknowledged proxies for neuronal activity. As such, it could be thought of as one of the best ways to investigate AN. Again, the potential of the BOLD signal as a surrogate marker of AN has been speculated on many instances with very few attempts to probe this hypothesis. Interestingly if one types “Neurogenesis and BOLD-fMRI” on PubMed, almost only rodent studies are found, although human studies exist and have compared BOLD functional responses in the hippocampus in elderly populations vs. younger populations showing CA3/dentate functional deficits related to memory impairments in healthy elderly subjects (Yassa and Stark, 2011). Although authors compared their findings to animal studies also using a pattern separation task in which the role of newborn granule cells was demonstrated (Clelland et al.,
In contrast to VBM, the BOLD signal has been extensively examined for many years, with many studies linking cellular changes to BOLD responses (Kida and Hyder,
Therefore, in vivo validation of the presence of AN may be improved by acquisition and cross-correlation of several MR parameters. This is illustrated in Figure 2 with a patchwork of different MR techniques used to determine one or more parameters responding to AN in the sheep hypothalamus during photoperiod. Also, all the knowledge accumulated to date of AN relies on reproducible immunohistochemical findings. Immunohistological-guided MR approaches must therefore be systematically conducted to validate the in vivo surrogate markers of AN since the different stages of AN remain invisible to macro-neuroimaging techniques. To illustrate this, rCBVmaps (Figure 2E) and their comparison in the hypothalamus of ewes show a significant increase during the short days of the year (Figure 2F) when AN was detected (Figure 1) (see Just et al.,
Diffusion-weighted MR methodologies
Diffusion MRI (dMRI) has become an inevitable neuroimaging technique, which has proven to be uniquely sensitive to the presence of various cell types (axons, dendrites, microtubules, and cell bodies) and their density, orientation, and permeability. dMRI provides unprecedented microstructural information on a micrometer scale enabling the investigation of underlying subtle microstructural changes in various disorders and physiological mechanisms. It represents therefore a technique of interest to investigate brain neuroplasticity both in animal models and in the clinical setting (Gatto,
Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)
How brain metabolism influences AN is a question that had gained more and more insights during the past decade. In particular, neuroenergetic mechanisms controlling neural stem cells and progenitor cells and their differentiation, proliferation, and maturation require vast amounts of energy involving various steps and various metabolic mechanisms such as lipogenesis and mitochondrial activity (reviewed by Knobloch and Jessberger,
Despite their non-invasiveness and translation potential, MRS investigations of AN have been rather limited to date. Studies by Manganas et al. (2007) attracted a lot of interest since the authors claimed to have found a biomarker of NPCs by proton MRS (1H-MRS). The methodology proposed by Manganas et al. (2007) went from in vitro measurement of the metabolism of NPC cells to their implantation in the hippocampus of rats and invivo1H-MRS measurement at 9.4 T. In 1H-MR spectra, a peak was found at 1.28 ppm, which was significantly elevated compared to control cells or control areas. The analysis of the chemical nature of the 1.28 ppm peak suggested that it could arise from lipid droplets during AN. Finally, measurements were performed on the hippocampus of healthy human subjects at 3 T. Unfortunately, important issues regarding the acquisition and analysis of their data were raised (Friedman,
Recently, Cherix et al. (
From a broader and translational perspective, we performed an 1H-MRS at 3 T of the hypothalamus of ewes during photoperiodism to identify potential changes in the neurochemical profile due to neurogenesis. Early results revealed significant changes in NAA, Glu (Figure 2), and Ins during the period of short days corresponding to AN compared to the period of long days (Just et al.,
Considerations on non-neurogenic processes in the adult brain
As mentioned at the beginning of this review, the existence of AN in the human brain remains controversial. In contrast to the well-accepted existence of hippocampal neurogenic niches (DG and SVZ) in the human brain [despite remaining controversies (Kempermann et al.,
Conclusion
Adult neurogenesis in the human brain has been described as a key process expected to tackle various neurodegenerative and metabolic diseases but remains controversial. Despite important advances on the topic, sparse developments have been made regarding specific in vivo measurements and translational neuroimaging. Here, we argued that an arsenal of MR techniques exists, which, combined with adequate animal models, could pave the way to resolving the controversy on the existence of AN in the human brain.
Funding
This work was funded by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-16-CE37-0006. NJ received research funding from the Lundbeck Foundation (Experiment grant, grant no. R370-2021-402).
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Author contributions
NJ wrote the manuscript. P-MC and MM edited, commented, and helped with the figures. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
BálentováS.HnilicováP.KalenskáD.MurínP.HajtmanováE.LehotskýJ.et al. (2017). Effect of whole-brain irradiation on the specific brain regions in a rat model: metabolic and histopathological changes. Neurotoxicology60, 70–81. 10.1016/j.neuro.2017.03.005
2
BergmannO. JLieblJ.BernardS.AlkassK.YeungM. S.SteierP.et al. (2012). The age of olfactory bulb neurons in humans, Neuron, 74, 634–639.
3
BonfantiL.PerettoP. (2011). Adult neurogenesis in mammals–a theme with many variations. Eur. J. Neurosci. 34, 930–950. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07832.x
4
ButruilleL.BataillerM.MazurD.PrévotV.MigaudM. (2018). Seasonal reorganization of hypothalamic neurogenic niche in adult sheep. Brain Struct. Funct. 223, 91–109. 10.1007/s00429-017-1478-z
5
ChenX.SobczakF.ChenY.JiangY.QianC.LuZ.et al. (2019). Mappingoptogenetically-driven single-vessel fMRI with concurrent neuronal calcium recordings in the rat hippocampus. Nat. Commun. 10, 5239. 10.1038/s41467-019-12850-x
6
CherixA.BrodierL.Poitry-YamateC.MatterJ. M.GruetterR. (2020). The appearance of the Warburg effect in the developing avian eye characterized in ovo: how neurogenesis can remodel neuroenergetics. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 61, 3. 10.1167/iovs.61.5.3
7
ChevillardP. M.BataillerM.PiéguB.EstienneA.BlacheM. C.DuboisJ. P.et al. (2022). Seasonal vascular plasticity in the mediobasal hypothalamus of the adult ewe. Histochem. Cell Biol. 157, 1–13. 10.1007/s00418-022-02079-z
8
ChevillardP. M.MigaudM.JustN. (2021). “Hypercapnic challenge, BOLD fMRI and immunohistochemistry to examine the in-vivo presence of adult neurogenesis in the sheep hypothalamus,” in Proceedings of the ISMRM, Virtual meeting, 2945.
9
ClellandC. D.ChoiM.RombergC.ClemensonG. D. Jr, Fragniere, A.TyersP.JessbergerS.et al. (2009). A functional role for adult hippocampal neurogenesis in spatial pattern separation. Science325, 210–213. 10.1126/science.1173215
10
Couillard-DespresS.AignerL. (2011). In vivo imaging of adult neurogenesis. Eur. J. Neurosci.33, 1037–1044. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07601.x
11
Couillard-DespresS.VreysR.AignerL.Van der LindenA. (2011). In vivo monitoring of adult neurogenesis in health and disease. Front. Neurosci. 5, 67. 10.3389/fnins.2011.00067
12
EllaA.DelgadilloJ. A.ChemineauP.KellerM. (2017). Computation of a high-resolution MRI 3D stereotaxic atlas of the sheep brain. J. Comp. Neurol. 525, 676–692. 10.1002/cne.24079
13
ErikssonP. S.PerfilievaE.Björk-ErikssonT.AlbornA. M.NordborgC.PetersonD. A.et al. (1998). Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus. Nat. Med.4, 1313–1317.
14
ErnstA.AlkassK.BernardS.SalehpourM.PerlS.TisdaleJ.et al. (2014). Neurogenesis in the striatum of the adult human brain. Cell156, 1072–1083. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.044
15
FaresJ.BouDiabZ.NabhaS.FaresY. (2019). Neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus: history, regulation, and prospective roles. Int. J. Neurosci. 129, 598–611. 10.1080/00207454.2018.1545771
16
FranklinT. R.WangZ.ShinJ.JagannathanK.SuhJ. J.DetreJ. A.et al. (2013). A VBM study demonstrating 'apparent' effects of a single dose of medication on T1-weighted MRIs. Brain Struct. Funct.218, 97–104. 10.1007/s00429-012-0385-6
17
FriedmanS.. (2008). Comment on “Magnetic resonance spectroscopy identifies neural progenitor cells in the live human brain”. Science321, 640. 10.1126/science.1153484
18
GageF. H.. (2019). Adultneurogenesis in mammals. Science364, 827–828. 10.1126/science.aav6885
19
GaoL.GaoT.ZengT.HuangP.WongN. K.DongZ.et al. (2021). Blockade of Indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase 1 ameliorates hippocampal neurogenesis and BOLD-fMRI signals in chronic stress precipitated depression. Aging13, 5875–5891. 10.18632/aging.202511
20
GattoR.. (2020). Molecular and microstructural biomarkers of neuroplasticity in neurodegenerative disorders through preclinical and diffusion magnetic resonance imaging studies. J. Integr. Neurosci. 19, 571–592. 10.31083/j.jin.2020.03.165
21
HoN. F.HookerJ. M.SahayA.HoltD. J.RoffmanJ. L. (2013). In vivo imaging of adult human hippocampal neurogenesis: progress, pitfalls and promise. Mol. Psychiatry18, 404–416. 10.1038/mp.2013.8
22
JurkowskiM. P.BettioL. K.WooE.PattenA.YauS. Y.et al. (2020). Beyond the hippocampus and the SVZ: adult neurogenesis throughout the brain. Front. Cell Neurosci. 14, 576444. 10.3389/fncel.2020.576444
23
JustN.AdriaensenH.EllaA.ChevillardP. M.BataillerM.DuboisJ. P.et al. (2021a). Blood oxygen level dependent fMRI and perfusion MRI in the sheep brain. Brain Res. 1760, 147390. 10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147390
24
JustN.ChevillardP. M.MigaudM. (2021b). “Photoperiodic regulation of hypothalamic metabolism: a preliminary single voxel Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy investigation at 3T,” in Proceedings of the Anuual Meeting of the ISMRM, Virtual meeting, 2229.
25
JustN.XinL.FrenkelH.GruetterR. (2013). Characterization of sustained BOLD activation in the rat barrel cortex and neurochemical consequences. Neuroimage74, 343–351. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.042
26
KempermannG.GageF. H.AignerL.SongH.CurtisM. A.ThuretS.et al. (2018). Human adult neurogenesis: evidence and remaining questions. J. Cell Stem Cell23, 25–30. 10.1016/j.stem.2018.04.004
27
KidaI.HyderF. (2006). Physiology of functional magnetic resonance imaging: energetics and function. Methods Mol. Med. 124, 175–195. 10.1385/1-59745-010-3, 175
28
KillgoreW. D.OlsonE. A.WeberM. (2013). Physical exercise habits correlate with gray matter volume of the hippocampus in healthy adult humans. Sci. Rep. 3, 3457. 10.1038/srep03457
29
KnoblochM.JessbergerS. (2017). Metabolism and neurogenesis. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 42, 45–52. 10.1016/j.conb.2016.11.006
30
KoushY.de GraafR. A.JiangL.RothmanD. L.HyderF. (2019). Functional MRS with J-edited lactate in human motor cortex at 4T. Neuroimage184, 101–108. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.008
31
KozarevaD. A.CryanJ. F.NolanY. M. (2019). Born this way: hippocampal neurogenesis across the lifespan. Aging Cell18, e13007. 10.1111/acel.13007
32
KuhnH. G.EischA. J.SpaldingK.PetersonD. A. (2016). Detection and phenotypic characterization of adult neurogenesis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 8, a025981. 10.1101/cshperspect.a025981
33
KuhnH. G.TodaT.GageF. H. (2018). Adult hippocampal neurogenesis: a coming-of-age story. J. Neurosci. 38, 10401–10410. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2144-18.2018
34
La RosaC.ParolisiR.BonfantiL. (2020). Brain structural plasticity: from adult neurogenesis to immature neurons. Front. Neurosci. 14, 75. 10.3389/fnins.2020.00075
35
LiC. X.ZhangX. (2017). Whole body MRI of the non-human primate using a clinical 3T scanner: initial experiences. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 7, 267–275. 10.21037/qims.2017.04.03
36
LucassenP. J.FitzsimonsC. P.SaltaE.Maletic-SavaticM. (2020). Adult neurogenesis, human after all (again): classic, optimized, and future approaches. Behav. Brain Res. 381, 112458. 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112458
37
LundellH.IngoC.DyrbyT. B.RonenI. (2021). Cytosolic diffusivity and microscopic anisotropy of N-acetyl aspartate in human white matter with diffusion-weighted MRS at 7T. NMR Biomed. 34, e4304. 10.1002/nbm.4304
38
LundellH.NilssonM.DyrbyT. B.ParkerG. J. M.CristinacceP. L. H.ZhouF. L.et al. (2019). Multidimensional diffusion MRI with spectrally modulated gradients reveals unprecedented microstructural detail. Sci. Rep.9, 9026. 10.1038/s41598-019-45235-7
39
Malpaux BMigaud M, Tricoire H, Chemineau P.. (2001). Biology of mammalian photoperiodism and the critical role of the pineal gland and melatonin. J. Biol. Rhythms.16, 336–347.
40
ManganasL. N.ZhangX.LiY.HazelR. D.SmithS. D.WagshulM. E.et al. (2007). Magnetic resonance spectroscopy identifies neural progenitor cells in the live human brain. Science318, 980–985. 10.1126/science.1147851
41
MartinS. J.GrimwoodP. D.MorrisR. G. (2000). Synaptic plasticity and memory: an evaluation of the hypothesis. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 23, 649–711. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.649
42
MigaudM.ButrilleL.BataillerM. (2015). Seasonal regulation of structural plasticity and neurogenesis in the adult mammalian brain: focus on the sheep hypothalamus. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 37, 146–157. 10.1016/j.yfrne.2014.11.004
43
PajkertA.PlonerC. J.LehmannT. N.WitteV. A.OltmannsF.SommerW.et al. (2020). Early volumetric changes of hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex following medial temporal lobe resection. Eur. J. Neurosci. 52, 4375–4384. 10.1111/ejn.14784
44
PalomboM.ShemeshN.RonenI.ValetteJ. (2018). Insights into brain microstructure from in vivo DW-MRS. Neuroimage182, 97–116. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.028
45
PereiraA. C.HuddlestonD. E.BrickmanA. M.SosunovA. A.HenR.McKhannG. M.et al. (2007). An in vivo correlate of exercise-induced neurogenesis in the adult dentate gyrus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 5638–5643. 10.1073/pnas.0611721104
46
PérèsE. A.EtienneO.GrigisA.BoumezbeurF.BoussinF. D.Le BihanD. (2018). Longitudinal study of irradiation-induced brain microstructural alterations with S-index, a diffusion MRI biomarker, and MR spectroscopy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 102, 1244–1254. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.01.070
47
PrevotV.DehouckB.SharifA.CiofiP.GiacobiniP.ClasadonteJ. (2018). The versatile tanycyte: a hypothalamic integrator of reproduction and energy metabolism. Endocr. Rev. 39, 333–368. 10.1210/er.2017-00235
48
RutlandJ. W.BrownS.VermaG.FeldmanR. E.SharmaH.MarkowitzM.et al. (2019). Hippocampal subfield-specific connectivity findings in major depressive disorder: a 7 Tesla diffusion MRI study. J. Psychiatr. Res. 111, 186–192. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.02.008
49
SasakiK.SumiyoshiA.NonakaH.KasaharaY.IkedaK.HallF. S.et al. (2015). Specific regions display altered grey matter volume in μ-opioid receptor knockout mice: MRI voxel-based morphometry. Br. J. Pharmacol. 172, 654–667. 10.1111/bph.12807
50
SenovaS.PouponC.DauguetJ.StewartH. J.DuguéG. P.JanC.et al. (2018). Optogenetic tractography for anatomo-functional characterization of cortico-subcortical neural circuits in non-human primates. Sci. Rep. 8, 3362. 10.1038/s41598-018-21486-8
51
SierraA.EncinasJ. M.Maletic-SavaticM. (2011). Adult human neurogenesis: from microscopy to magnetic resonance imaging. Front. Neurosci. 5, 47. 10.3389/fnins.2011.00047
52
SierraA.GröhnO.PitkänenA. (2015). Imaging microstructural damage and plasticity in the hippocampus during epileptogenesis. Neuroscience309, 162–172. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.04.054
53
SorrellsS. F.ParedesM. F.Cebrian-SillaA.SandovalK.QiD.KelleyK. W.et al. (2018). Human hippocampal neurogenesis drops sharply in children to undetectable levels in adults. Nature555, 377–381. 10.1038/nature25975
54
SpaldingK. L.BergmannO.AlkassK.BernardS.SalehpourM.HuttnerH. B.et al. (2013). Dynamics of hippocampal neurogenesis in adult humans. Cell153, 1219–1227. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.002
55
SteventonJ. J.FosterC.FurbyH.HelmeD.WiseR. G.MurphyK. (2020). Hippocampal blood flow is increased after 20 min of moderate-intensity exercise. Cereb. Cortex30, 525–533. 10.1093/cercor/bhz104
56
TaupinP.. (2009). Magnetic resonance imaging for monitoring neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus. Expert Opin. Med. Diagn. 3, 211–216. 10.1517/13543770902735816
57
TodaT.GageF. H. (2018). Review: adult neurogenesis contributes to hippocampal plasticity. Cell Tissue Res. 373, 693–709. 10.1007/s00441-017-2735-4
58
TreitS.SteveT.GrossD. W.BeaulieuC. (2018). High resolution in-vivo diffusion imaging of the human hippocampus. Neuroimage182, 479–487. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.034
59
van der MarelK.BouetV.MeerhoffG. F.FreretT.BoulouardM.DauphinF.et al. (2015). Effects of long-term methylphenidate treatment in adolescent and adult rats on hippocampal shape, functional connectivity and adult neurogenesis. Neuroscience309, 243–258. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.04.044
60
Vestergaard-PoulsenP.WegenerG.HansenB.BjarkamC. R.BlackbandS. J.NielsenN. C.et al. (2011). Diffusion-weighted MRI and quantitative biophysical modeling of hippocampal neurite loss in chronic stress. PLoS ONE6, e20653. 10.1371/journal.pone.0020653
61
YassaM. A.StarkC. E. (2011). Pattern separation in the hippocampus. Trends Neurosci. 34, 515–525. 10.1016/j.tins.2011.06.006
62
ZhangW.GuG. J.ZhangQ.LiuJ. H.ZhangB.GuoY.et al. (2017). NSCs promote hippocampal neurogenesis, metabolic changes and synaptogenesis in APP/PS1 transgenic mice. Hippocampus27, 1250–1263. 10.1002/hipo.22794
63
ZitellaL. M.XiaoY.TeplitzkyB. A.KastlD. J.DuchinY.BakerK. B.et al. (2015). In vivo 7T MRI of the non-human primate brainstem. PLoS ONE10, e0127049. 10.1371/journal.pone.0127049
Summary
Keywords
adult neurogenesis, MRI, animal models, human brain, controversy, diffusion, MRS
Citation
Just N, Chevillard P-M and Migaud M (2022) Imaging and spectroscopic methods to investigate adult neurogenesis in vivo: New models and new avenues. Front. Neurosci. 16:933947. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.933947
Received
01 May 2022
Accepted
11 July 2022
Published
05 August 2022
Volume
16 - 2022
Edited by
Xi-Nian Zuo, Beijing Normal University, China
Reviewed by
Vassiliy Tsytsarev, University of Maryland, College Park, United States
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2022 Just, Chevillard and Migaud.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Nathalie Just nathaliej@drcmr.dk
This article was submitted to Brain Imaging Methods, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.