Beyond the surface: how ex-vivo diffusion-weighted imaging reveals large animal brain microstructure and connectivity

Diffusion-weighted Imaging (DWI) is an effective and state-of-the-art neuroimaging method that non-invasively reveals the microstructure and connectivity of tissues. Recently, novel applications of the DWI technique in studying large brains through ex-vivo imaging enabled researchers to gain insights into the complex neural architecture in different species such as those of Perissodactyla (e.g., horses and rhinos), Artiodactyla (e.g., bovids, swines, and cetaceans), and Carnivora (e.g., felids, canids, and pinnipeds). Classical in-vivo tract-tracing methods are usually considered unsuitable for ethical and practical reasons, in large animals or protected species. Ex-vivo DWI-based tractography offers the chance to examine the microstructure and connectivity of formalin-fixed tissues with scan times and precision that is not feasible in-vivo. This paper explores DWI’s application to ex-vivo brains of large animals, highlighting the unique insights it offers into the structure of sometimes phylogenetically different neural networks, the connectivity of white matter tracts, and comparative evolutionary adaptations. Here, we also summarize the challenges, concerns, and perspectives of ex-vivo DWI that will shape the future of the field in large brains.


Introduction
Recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have made it a powerful tool for studying brain anatomy and function in different animals ranging from humans (Pfefferbaum et al., 2004;Dawe et al., 2009;McNab et al., 2009), non-human primates (D'Arceuil et al., 2007), rodents (Zhang J. et al., 2012;Russo et al., 2021), birds (Behroozi et al., 2020;Hamaide et al., 2020;Orije et al., 2021), reptiles (Behroozi et al., 2018;Billings et al., 2020), and even marine mammals (Berns et al., 2015;Gerussi et al., 2023Gerussi et al., , 2024)).Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) distinguishes out from other approaches because it can non-invasively analyze neuroanatomical connectivity and white matter microstructure via measuring the restricted diffusion of water molecules in tissue (Le Bihan, 1996;Assaf et al., 2019).Given that water makes up around 60-70% of the body, understanding diffusion is 10.3389/fnins.2024.1411982critical.Diffusion refers to the random, thermally-driven, Brownian motion of molecules (Mukherjee et al., 2008).Water diffusivity in a homogeneous medium occurs randomly and isotropically with equal probability in all directions.On the other hand, water diffusivity in restricted environments surrounded by walls or membranes is anisotropic, and thus the probability of diffusion is higher along one direction over the others.It is therefore the case in brain tissue where water in the extracellular space or inside the somata diffuses isotropically, while water molecules inside neuronal axons are narrowly limited by axonal membranes, and thus the probability of diffusion parallel to the major axes is higher than the perpendicular (Moseley et al., 1991;Baliyan et al., 2016).
This random Brownian motion can be accurately estimated through DWI-MR sequences, employing gradients at different high amplitudes and combinations, i.e., directions.These sequences basically measure the anisotropic characteristics of water molecules which can reflect either the normal condition of the brain parenchyma or alterations directly from the raw data (anisotropy) in case of some pathologies (Benjamin et al., 2017;Mallon et al., 2020;Makada and Matang, 2023).The development of the algorithms encoding DWI sequences can then offer insights into the micro-architectural details of white matter at each voxel.Consequently, fiber tractography enables the elucidation of white matter integrity and the delineation of axonal tracts throughout the brain.
While in-vivo DWI has revolutionized the study of brain connectivity, ex-vivo DWI approaches offer distinct advantages, particularly in: (i) enhanced resolution: ex-vivo imaging allows for significantly higher voxel resolutions with enhanced signalto-noise ratios (SNR), often reaching scales of hundreds of micrometers (Roebroeck et al., 2019).This level of resolution surpasses the constraints of in-vivo scans, typically limited to a range of 1-3 millimeters.The finer granularity of ex-vivo imaging facilitates an accurate mapping of intricate neural pathways and structures.Recent advances in DWI approaches have focused on optimizing SNR, voxel resolution, MR sequence, and the capacity to image big whole brains.These developments include the use of stronger gradients, higher magnetic field strengths, and customized pulse sequences that improve the contrast and resolution of DWI images, allowing the observation of previously undetectable microstructural features.(ii) Exploring rare and extinct species: exvivo DWI provides an invaluable tool to study the brains of rare, endangered, and "extinct in the wild" animals.Specimens preserved in brain banks, museums, or available from veterinary services after the natural death of zoological park specimens offer researchers a unique opportunity to delve into the neural architecture of species outside of current neuroanatomical models.(iii) Investigating large brains: some animals possess brains and bodies that often exceed the dimensions accommodated by current in-vivo imaging technology.One of the main challenges lies in the absence of coils large enough to adequately capture these dimensions from the animal's head.Ex-vivo approaches bypass this limitation by allowing the study of large-brain species without spatial constraints, through extraction of the brain or section of the head.This capability is particularly advantageous to investigate the neural basis of complex cognitive abilities and behavioral repertoires in species with expansive brain sizes or extreme habitats, such as cetaceans (Gerussi et al., 2023) and elephants (Hakeem et al., 2005).This review aims to highlight the indispensable role of exvivo DWI in studying the structural architecture of the brain.By employing this technique, researchers can uncover patterns of brain organization and connectivity, shedding light on evolutionary adaptations, behavioral complexities, and ecological dynamics.Exvivo DWI thus emerges as an essential tool integrating advanced imaging methodologies to potentiate ambitious comparative neuroanatomy, furthering our understanding of brain connectivity.

Assessing white matter connectivity
Fiber tractography algorithms use data from DWI scans to predict the pathways of white matter tracts based on the directional diffusion of water molecules.This method gives crucial insights into the brain's structural connectivity, allowing researchers to investigate the structure and integrity of neuronal circuits.At the moment, there are two main physics-based approaches to modeling white matter diffusion anisotropy (i) diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) (Basser et al., 1994), and (ii) constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD) (Tournier et al., 2007).DTI analyses fiber orientation through voxel-wise evaluations (voxel refers to the smallest analytic unit), generating a singular tensor model that estimates a single three-dimensional orientation per voxel (Basser et al., 1994;Basser, 1995).This method demands minimal data points (a minimum of six independent measurements in different directions) for estimation, making it computationally efficient.While this approach is robust when there is a clear dominating diffusion direction within a voxel, it loses sensitivity when faced with multiple fiber pathways, such as crossing or branching fibers (Basser et al., 2000).In contrast, CSD as a tensor-free modeling approach, estimates the fiber orientation distribution (FOD) response function (Tournier et al., 2007(Tournier et al., , 2012) ) within each voxel, revealing the orientations and contributions of different fiber populations to observed diffusion behavior, and therefore does not assume isotropic diffusion (Farquharson et al., 2013).FOD does not lose information by averaging to obtain a single tensor, allowing for multiple fiber orientations to be identified.In contrast to the CSD, the simplified version of the Ball-and-Stick model proposed by Yang et al. (2019) offers notable advantages in terms of computing efficiency and implementation simplicity.While it is less intricate compared to CSD, this model operates effectively by splitting the diffusion-weighted MR signal within each voxel into multiple anisotropic components, representing different fiber orientations, along with a single isotropic component.This simplicity not only decreases processing needs but also allows for quicker implementation, making it especially helpful in cases where computational resources are restricted or swift analysis is necessary.The choice of method is determined by the individual research needs, the complexity of the fiber topologies under consideration, and the computational resources (Figure 1).
In this mini-review, we focused on physical-based diffusion models, specifically DTI and CSD, due to their established clinical use, computational efficiency, and robustness to noise (Tournier et al., 2007).These models require less stringent data acquisition parameters, making them suitable for studies with limited scanning time or lower magnetic field strengths.However, other algorithms have been developed to overcome the drawbacks of DTI (or CSD)  (2022,2023,2024) and Graïc et al. (2023).
such as Diffusion Spectrum Imaging (DSI) (Wedeen et al., 2012), Ball-and-Stick model (Yang et al., 2019), and Q-ball imaging (QBI) (Tuch, 2004).As the community seeks to gain a deeper knowledge of neuronal connections, it must look beyond DTI and tensorfree methods such as CSD to accurately model diffusion behavior furthering our understanding of brain anatomy and function.To this aim, we emphasize the potential of biophysical models like Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging (NODDI) (Zhang H. et al., 2012) and Composite Hindered and Restricted Model of Diffusion (CHARMED) (Assaf and Basser, 2005) to provide more nuanced insights into tissue composition.However, their application is often constrained by the need for high-quality, multi-shell diffusion data, greater computational resources, and acquisition protocols that must support the model's assumptions (Jelescu et al., 2020).We believe that future studies with access to advanced imaging modalities may benefit from incorporating biophysical models to further elucidate the complexities of neural tissue.
From DWI data, fiber pathways can be reconstructed using various models tailored to the research requirements and objectives, such as probabilistic vs. deterministic models or ROI analysis vs. whole-brain tractography [for details, see (Jeurissen et al., 2019;Zhang et al., 2022)].Once fiber pathways have been reconstructed, quantitative assessment of specific tracts can reveal important insights into brain anatomy and function.This assessment requires examining several metrics generated from tractography data to evaluate parameters such as total tract volume, total length of reconstructed fiber tract, curvature, and connectivity strength.However, quantitative assessment of selected tracks using diffusion tensor metrics can provide information about white matter microstructural integrity.Fractional Anisotropy (FA) is a widely used parameter that measures the degree of directionality of water diffusion within a voxel and is sensitive to changes in white matter microstructure, such as myelination, crossing fiber orientation, and axonal density (Beaulieu, 2002).Furthermore, axial (AD) and radial (RD) diffusivities are the water diffusion coefficients parallel and perpendicular to the axons indicating axonal integrity and fiber myelination, respectively (Tournier et al., 2012).Furthermore, recent studies have demonstrated the potential of relaxometry parameters, such as effective transverse relaxation rate (R2 * ) and longitudinal relaxation rate (R1), as they provide additional information regarding tissue microstructure and composition.R2 * is sensitive to iron concentration and myelin integrity (Straub et al., 2020), which are critical to the proper functioning of neural fibers.R1 values provide information on the longitudinal relaxation properties of tissue, which can indicate water content and macromolecule presence (Weiskopf et al., 2013).Understanding the fiber-specific relaxometry properties can offer enhanced specificity and sensitivity in differentiating the white matter architecture, especially in regions with crossing fibers (De Santis et al., 2016).Overall, a quantitative evaluation of selected tracts enables the characterization of white matter pathways in terms of size, shape, symmetry, and microstructural features, which is essential to understanding brain connections.

Tissue properties and preparation
Fixed samples are frequently employed in ex-vivo tissue imaging because they provide the longitudinal stability necessary for longer scanning sessions.There are significant factors and trade-offs to consider when scanning ex-vivo tissues compared to in-vivo.
While fixed tissue samples present certain challenges (see below), they offer the distinct advantage of temporal stability, facilitating time-dependent enhancements in image resolution that enable meticulous analysis of structures at the micron scale.Such precision would be nearly impossible to reach in current scanning times in-vivo.The absence of rhythmic blood flow, and virtually any movement allows for any sequence length to be performed to ideal standards, in as many diffusion directions as desired, optimizing results while reducing artifacts.This also implies that nearly identical scans can be made repeatedly over long periods of time, on more modern machines, in bores that would not fit a whole head, or after transport from a remote location.Once the sample has been extracted and fixed, it can be kept safely available in a bank for years without significant deterioration, thus providing any researcher with brains from species they would have no access to otherwise.To be also considered is the absence of a medical or veterinary care team to monitor anesthetized in-vivo subjects, or trained animals in rare cases (Andics and Miklósi, 2018), and therefore the absence of risk for them, the subject, or the machine.Even in the best case, most large species are very challenging to scan because of physical, medical, and time constraints.In practical terms, an ex-vivo specimen is brought to room temperature, scanned, and removed at will, depending on the scanning procedure, and not the other way around.
The main issues usually reported with ex-vivo scanning regard the post-mortem interval (PMI, the time elapsed between death and tissue fixation) and the correct fixation of the brain.Given 10.3389/fnins.2024.1411982that tissue fixation processes either halt or significantly slow down metabolic decay, it is crucial to consider the PMI.A fundamental difference between large brains and those of small animals lies in the methods of brain tissue fixation and preservation.In small, laboratory animals, perfusion fixation via pre-mortem intracardiac injection of fixative, in addition to immersion fixation post-tissue extraction, reduces PMI to essentially zero.Conversely, in large animals, usually not kept in laboratory conditions, post-mortem perfusion fixation via mechanical pumping of fixative through the cadaver, often utilizing the femoral artery in humans or the carotid arteries and jugular veins in animals, results in a poorer diffusion of the fixative due to post-mortem blood clotting, amounting to a longer PMI (McFadden et al., 2019).In most studies on human brains, a "good" PMI is considered < 24 h (Maranzano et al., 2020).Moreover, mechanical perfusion fixation is not commonly used in larger brains due to the difficulty in washing blood clots and the possibility of microscopic damage from pumping pressure.Consequently, large brains are typically fixed via immersion.However, immersion fixation proves less effective for large brains compared to small animals due to the prolonged duration required for passive diffusion of fixative over greater distances (Dawe et al., 2009), resulting in lower-quality fixation (Werner et al., 2000;Kasukurthi et al., 2009;Gage et al., 2012).An optimized fixation protocol, taking into account all scenarios, would require the shortest PMI possible, refrigeration (but absolutely no freezing), vascular clearing using iso-osmotic solutions, then fixative perfusion and immersion.The fixative volume should be 10 times the brain volume and changed 24 to 48 h after immersion.There should be clarity on the facts that paraformaldehyde is a solid, which forms formaldehyde (a gas) in solution, and that a 4% formaldehyde solution is equal to a 10% formalin solution, with the exception that formalin contains methanol (about 1% in a 10% formalin solution) to prevent precipitation into paraformaldehyde, but which can alter immunohistochemical properties of the tissue in the long term.
Nonetheless, the use of fixatives such as formalin or other formaldehyde solutions is known to alter tissue diffusion characteristics by promoting intermolecular cross-linking (Pfefferbaum et al., 2004;Shepherd et al., 2009).Furthermore, fixed samples frequently have lower proton density and shorter T1 and T2 relaxation times than living subjects, which can be attributed to the combined effects of tissue fixation, post-mortem changes, and a lower temperature (typically room temperature, approximately 23 • C) than the body's normal temperature (Roebroeck et al., 2019).The shortened T2 relaxation time and diffusivity of fixed tissue have a considerable impact on the contrast-to-noise ratio in DWI, which is critical for high-quality ex-vivo DWI.To provide appropriate contrast with reduced diffusivity, higher diffusion weighting is required.Increased diffusion weighting often necessitates longer echo times, making signal loss from T2 relaxation time a limiting issue, especially when short T2 causes the unweighted-diffusion signal to decay quickly.To keep a good SNR, a possible solution could be the use of optimized sequences with shorter echo times while still keeping long diffusion times such as stimulated echo-acquisition mode [STEAM, (Merboldt et al., 1991;Rane et al., 2010)] or sequences which accumulate magnetization over multiple repetition times still keeping strong diffusion weighting such as steady-state free precession [SSFP, (McNab and Miller, 2010)].Fixation by immersion revealed a notable decrease in T1, T2 relaxation times, and diffusivity within post-mortem brain tissue.For instance, Shepherd et al. (2009) discovered that rat cortical slices immersion-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde had a 21% decrease in T1 and an 81% decrease in T2 compared to fresh, unfixed post-mortem values (Shepherd et al., 2009).Similar results were seen in ex vivo human white matter, where T1 and T2 relaxation times were measured at 340 ms and 45 ms, respectively, at 3 Tesla.These findings suggest reductions of approximately 35% in T1 and 60% in T2 (McNab et al., 2009;Miller et al., 2012).These studies show that a significant percentage of T2 drop may be attributable simply to the fixation process, which is likely caused by a combination of dehydration and the presence of unbound fixative.The decrease in T1 is integral to tissue fixation as it is predominantly influenced by the size of molecules within the tissue environment and cannot be reversed during rehydration.This reduction is likely attributed to the cross-linking of proteins, which is irreversible (Tovi and Ericsson, 1992;Shepherd et al., 2009).However, prolonged washing in saline or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove fixative and rehydrate the specimen has been shown to fully recover T2 decreases to levels equivalent to fresh, unfixed post-mortem samples [but not to in-vivo levels (Shepherd et al., 2009)].
In terms of the reduction in diffusivity observed in fixed samples, animal studies have shown a significant decrease, with a 50% reduction in apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) observed in unfixed ex vivo white matter (WM) and an 80% reduction in fixed WM compared to in-vivo values (D'Arceuil et al., 2007).Additionally, washing fixed tissue in PBS has been demonstrated to partially reverse these effects, with reported increases in WM ADC by approximately 30%.Similar findings were observed in ex-vivo human brains, with WM diffusivity reduced by approximately 85% compared to in-vivo values (McNab et al., 2009;Foxley et al., 2014).The decreased temperature of ex-vivo tissues during scanning is a crucial factor contributing to the overall reduction in diffusivity.Le Bihan (1996) previously illustrated that a drop in tissue temperature by 1 • C corresponds to an expected 2.4% decrease in water diffusivity.However, recent research has indicated that even when temperature adjustments are made in a manner akin to Le Bihan's technique, differences in diffusivity persist (Dyrby et al., 2011;Walker et al., 2019).Controlling these factors using for example 40 • C PBS could help alleviate part of the issue.
It should be noted that all existing challenges do not invalidate the utility and need of fixed tissue samples for studies concerning precise tissue cytoarchitecture or white matter connectivity.On the contrary, we aim to highlight the potential translational significance of fixed tissue as diffusion imaging gains prominence in examining neural microstructure and connectivity.However, when ex-vivo DWI-MR studies are validated against histology or compared to in-vivo DWI, it is necessary to consider all the challenges mentioned earlier.
In other domestic species, which emerged recently as models for translational medicine, DWI has also been adopted.It is the case of the sheep (Ovis aries) (Förschler et al., 2007;Lee et al., 2015;Peruffo et al., 2019;O'Connell et al., 2021;Pirone et al., 2021;Banstola and Reynolds, 2022;Gerussi et al., 2022;Graïc et al., 2023), the Göttingen (Knösche et al., 2015) and Yucatan (Wang et al., 2023) minipigs (Sus scrofa).It is worth noting that in these cases, most of the analyses were conducted using fixed brains.When compared to other laboratory animals, the brains of large ungulates such as horses, pigs, and domestic ruminants have received relatively little attention, despite their high availability following slaughter (Cozzi et al., 2020).In fact, these brains could potentially serve as a non-invasive source for the study of comparative and evolutionary neuroscience.
In the context of wild and exotic species, DWI analysis involves the study of both pathological conditions (Cook et al., 2018) and anatomical features (Cook et al., 2021;Cook and Berns, 2022) in pinnipeds but there are also investigations in one-humped camel (Camelus dromedarius) (Cartiaux et al., 2023) and dolphin brains (Berns et al., 2015;Wright et al., 2018;Orekhova et al., 2022;Gerussi et al., 2023Gerussi et al., , 2024)).Table 1 summarizes the most important publications concerning the use of DWI in large brains.

Discussion
MRI has established itself as an essential non-invasive technique in both neuroscientific research and clinical treatment (Assaf et al., 2019).The following development of DWI has expanded our understanding by digging into the microscopic characteristics of the white matter, allowing for the analysis of brain connections in both pathological and purely anatomicophysiological contexts using sophisticated tractography methods (Le Bihan, 1996).Clinical applications of DWI have not only transformed human medicine but have also proven beneficial in veterinary medicine, offering critical insights for neuropathological diagnoses in domestic animals (Hasegawa et al., 2003;Salma, 2015;Crawford et al., 2023).Furthermore, DWI has been effectively applied to domestic species often used in translational medicine, such as sheep and pigs, mostly demonstrating feasibility and setting standards for these species (Lee et al., 2015;Ella et al., 2019).DWI, and consequently tractography, have merged as critical techniques for studying brain connections in large animals, including domestic and "wild" mammals such as dolphins or camels.Notably, DWI's capacity to work in formalin-fixed tissues has broadened its application (D'Arceuil et al., 2007;Berns et al., 2015;Cook et al., 2018;Wright et al., 2018;Cartiaux et al., 2023;Gerussi et al., 2023Gerussi et al., , 2024;;Graïc et al., 2023).Conducting invasive experiments and consequent euthanasia on these large, wild species are ethically nearly infeasible today.Furthermore, for the same reasons along with practical restrictions, potential in-vivo MRI in large species are extremely rare, and so far have not been published.As a result, ex-vivo imaging has emerged as the principal method for investigating the basis of complex cognitive abilities and behaviors in these species, providing outstanding neuroanatomical knowledge.Ex-vivo DWI also allows for significantly higher voxel resolutions maintaining a good SNR through adequate sequences such as STEM or SSFP, or re-hydration of the tissue with PBS, reaching scales of hundreds of micrometers.This level of resolution notably overcomes the limits of time-constrained in-vivo scans, allowing for an accurate mapping of brain structures and neural pathways.
This MRI technique has great potential for studying not only rare and endangered species but also extinct species whose unique specimens are currently fixed and preserved in museums or banks.Leveraging this option might allow the neuroscientific and broader scientific communities to investigate the evolution and development of brains across a wider range of taxa.
However, for DWI to give valid results, some factors must be considered.The first, and most important, is tissue fixation.There is no doubt that white matter integrity is central to any tract tracing algorithm (Beaulieu, 2002).In fact, the process of tissue fixation must happen as soon and swiftly as possible in order to block the autolytic mechanisms of the tissues which leads to the loss of integrity of the white matter.Fixation is a challenge and may not always be optimal in large animals for several factors such as the time between the death of the animal and awareness of park personnel (depending on the park, from minutes to several hours), the complexity of the vascular system supplying the brain (e.g., in cetaceans), the complex anatomy of the skull (such as that of rhinoceroses, elephants or giraffes) or ambient temperature (fast cooling of tissue seems to play a critical role in nervous tissue autolysis).All these factors are usually understood as a whole under the umbrella term of PMI, although wide variations can occur (e.g., a 24 h at 35 • C ambient temperature is different in outcome from 24 h at 5 • C), although a recent study seems to indicate minimal immunohistochemical effects (Koehler et al., 2024), and in details, PMI explains only part of the problems encountered in large brain fixation.For all these reasons, fixation by immersion seems to remain the most used alternative, as is the case in human brain preservation (Nardi et al., 2023).The fixative should be changed after the first 24 h, and a large volume is necessary (ideally 10 times the volume to be fixed).A topic still often discussed with confusion regards the type of fixative used.Finally, even after extraction, the size of some brains reaches ∼30 cm in diameter, and adapted coils may not exist.
The second main aspect to consider is the choice of DWI parameters.DTI, CSD, and other algorithms offer different approaches to analyze white matter diffusion anisotropy.Sequences used for DTI are fast, and do not require a high b-value or a high number of directions; however, DTI provides only a single 3D orientation per voxel and is, by definition, limited in the detection of multiple fiber populations within a voxel.On the other hand, sequences used for CSD require a long scan time Comparatively, the CSD algorithm is able to identify multiple fiber orientations within a voxel without losing information, making it more robust for mapping complex fiber tracts.However, the DWI methods used for analysis must align with the research aims and objectives, fulfilling the specific requirements and questions posed by researchers, whether from a physics-based perspective or a biophysical-based perspective.
In conclusion, DWI and tractography have emerged as highly promising non-invasive MRI techniques for studying large animal brains.They offer remarkable insights into their complex and relatively understudied neuroanatomy and connectivity.Despite the challenges, drawbacks, and constraints, these tools represent a valuable addition to the limited toolbox available for enhancing our understanding of comparative brain anatomy, connections, and evolution.

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1 Whole-brain tractography in different species using CSD and DTI methods.(a) Human brain: This image represents the classical in-vivo T1-weighted structural image and the whole-brain tractography of a human brain shown here as a comparison with the other animals.The tractogram was created using CSD.(b) Bottlenose dolphin brain: Depicted here is an ex-vivo T2-weighted brain of a bottlenose dolphin along with its whole-brain tractogram, generated using the CSD method.(c) Sheep brain: The top image shows a T2-weighted anatomical view of an ex-vivo sheep brain, while the bottom image presents its corresponding whole-brain tractogram employing DTI.For more details, refer to Gerussi et al.(2022, 2023, 2024)  andGraïc et al. (2023).

TABLE 1
Gerussi et al., 2023Gerussi et al., , 2024))ge brains with correspondent MRI sequences and DWI algorithms used.Knösche et al., 2015): Found that various DWI protocols are likely to find major fiber bundles but are less sensitive to complex fiber architecture and high spatial resolution and SNR are needed.Gerussi et al., 2023Gerussi et al., , 2024)): Determined the prefrontal cortex position in the bottlenose dolphin based on thalamic connections.withhigher, multishelled b-values in a high number of directions.