Diving deep: zebrafish models in motor neuron degeneration research

In the dynamic landscape of biomedical science, the pursuit of effective treatments for motor neuron disorders like hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) remains a key priority. Central to this endeavor is the development of robust animal models, with the zebrafish emerging as a prime candidate. Exhibiting embryonic transparency, a swift life cycle, and significant genetic and neuroanatomical congruencies with humans, zebrafish offer substantial potential for research. Despite the difference in locomotion—zebrafish undulate while humans use limbs, the zebrafish presents relevant phenotypic parallels to human motor control disorders, providing valuable insights into neurodegenerative diseases. This review explores the zebrafish's inherent traits and how they facilitate profound insights into the complex behavioral and cellular phenotypes associated with these disorders. Furthermore, we examine recent advancements in high-throughput drug screening using the zebrafish model, a promising avenue for identifying therapeutically potent compounds.


Introduction
Motor neuron diseases (MNDs) are a clinically diverse group of neurological disorders which are characterized by the progressive degeneration of the upper and lower motor neurons in the brain and spinal cord, respectively.Prominent features of MNDs include muscle spasticity and atrophy, weakness and paralysis of upper and lower body parts affecting speech, swallowing, breathing and movement (Desai and Olney, 2009;Dion et al., 2009;Tiryaki and Horak, 2014;Foster and Salajegheh, 2019).The most common types of MNDs include, hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and spinal muscular atrophy (SMA).Although these disorders have different etiologies, all of them lead to extreme disability (Khaniani et al., 2013;Robberecht and Philips, 2013;Fink, 2014).Despite considerable progress in comprehending these debilitating disorders, an effective cure remains elusive.This challenge is partly attributed to our incomplete understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms, which are further complicated by mutations in genes regulating various cellular processes.To gain deeper insight into the mechanisms underpinning these devastating disorders, it is essential to establish a simple and genetically tractable animal model.

Optical Clarity High Fecundity Genomic Conservation
Drug Screening Ease Of Genetic Manipulation Live Imaging

FIGURE
Advantages of zebrafish as a model organism.The illustration depicts the benefits of zebrafish in biological research which includes: High fecundity, capacity to produce large number of o spring; Optical clarity, transparency of the embryos and larvae; Genomic conservation, high genetic similarity with humans; Ease of genetic manipulation, ease in manipulation of risk genes associated with motor neuron diseases; Live imaging, potential for bioimaging due to optical transparency of embryos and larvae; Drug screening, ability of zebrafish for the screening of compounds with therapeutic potential.
The zebrafish, with its numerous advantages such as optical clarity of embryos, ease of genetic manipulation, rapid development, and significant genetic similarity to humans, stands out in neurological research (Figure 1).Its structural and functional parallels with mammalian neural circuitry, combined with its suitability for high-throughput drug screening, make it an invaluable tool (Laale, 1977;Lieschke and Currie, 2007).These attributes facilitate a deeper understanding of neurological disorders and accelerate the development of therapeutic strategies, bridging the gap between laboratory research and clinical applications for human patients.
This review explores how the zebrafish complements and augments the capabilities of other invertebrate and vertebrate animal models and updates existing reviews on this topic (Patten et al., 2014).We delve into innovative methods of genetic manipulation within the zebrafish genome and highlight recent strides in modeling HSP, ALS, and SMA.Additionally, we discuss the role of zebrafish in advancing drug screens, contributing to the broader spectrum of research efforts aimed at treating these and other neurological conditions.
How zebrafish stands out as a model organism?
Zebrafish were first introduced in biology research by George Streisinger in the 1970s (Streisinger et al., 1981).Later in the 1990s, Christiane Nsslein-Volhard and colleagues, employing a forward genetics approach, established zebrafish as a classical model for developmental biology and embryological studies (Driever et al., 1996;Haffter et al., 1996;Amsterdam et al., 1999).Recently, however, the scope of zebrafish research has significantly expanded.Now, it is increasingly recognized for its potential in modeling neurodegenerative disorders, especially the MNDs (Patten et al., 2014;Chia et al., 2022).The zebrafish model stands out in disease modeling due to the optical transparency of its embryos and larvae.This key feature significantly aids in the phenotypic characterization of mutations associated with MNDs, allowing researchers to observe common pathogenic features, such as curly tails, small heads and eyes, abnormal fin morphology, and motor axon outgrowth defects, with remarkable clarity (McWhorter et al., 2003;Ramesh et al., 2010;Martin et al., 2012).These morphological phenotypes are often accompanied by phenotypical behaviors and zebrafish emerged as an excellent vertebrate model for high throughput behavioral screening (Gerlai, 2010;Pelkowski et al., 2011;Green et al., 2012;Miscevic et al., 2012;Ingebretson and Masino, 2013;Richendrfer and Créton, 2013;Bruni et al., 2014;Clift et al., 2014;Garg et al., 2022).Deficits in the locomotor behavior characterize almost all types of MNDs and larval zebrafish can be elicited to exhibit their locomotor behavior through auditory, visual, olfactory, vestibular, heat, and touch stimulation (Orger and de Polavieja, 2017).
The zebrafish larvae shows burst swimming after hatching at 48-72 hpf which then changes to beat and glide swimming by 4 days post fertilization (dpf) (Saint-Amant and Drapeau, 1998;Buss and Drapeau, 2001;Drapeau et al., 2002;Brustein et al., 2003).Alternating light-dark test, in which larval zebrafish more than 4dpf, when exposed to alternating light and dark stimuli, develop a pattern of resting state in light followed by a pattern of increased movement in the dark (Burgess and Granato, 2007).This test is extensively used these days for high-throughput screening of a number of neuroactive drugs (Basnet et al., 2019).In contrast to larvae, adult zebrafish uses undulatory swimming as their principal mode of locomotion, which involves the production of a traveling wave of increasing amplitude which runs along the body down to the caudal fin that propels the fish forward (Gray, 1933;Wardle et al., 1995;Lauder and Tytell, 2005;Müller and Van Leeuwen, 2006;Smits, 2019).Generally, the amplitude of the wave motion decreases over the due course of the swimming period and next phase starts before the previous one is terminated (Müller et al., 2000).Different locomotion patterns produced by adult zebrafish including thrust, slip, yaw, saccades can be evaluated in fish with mutation in MND-associated genes for characterizing the swimming deficits (Garg et al., 2022).
Using the aforementioned stimuli, the swimming activity of zebrafish can be reliably elicited and studied with high-throughput automatic tracking methods.The tracking methods for zebrafish and other limbless organisms include several sophisticated trackers such as the Multi Worm Tracker (Swierczek et al., 2011), idTracker (Pérez-Escudero et al., 2014;Romero-Ferrero et al., 2019), and TRex (Walter and Couzin, 2021).These trackers manage uniform backgrounds and iso-illumination, simplifying the tracking process.A few tracking projects are focused on larval tracking such as Zebrafish Larvae Position Tracker (Z-LaP Tracker) (Gore et al., 2023), pi-tailtrack (Randlett, 2023), and ZebraZoom ./fnins. .(Mirat et al., 2013).In contrast, LACE (Garg et al., 2022) focuses on adult zebrafish.Recently, more advanced image recognition trackers such as DeepLabCut, based on ResNet neural networks, have been fine-tuned on visual markers to improve accuracy in complex environments (Mathis et al., 2018).Additionally, simpler yet effective image recognition trackers like YOLO can be utilized for similar purposes (Hussain, 2023).Each of these trackers offers unique advantages depending on the specific requirements and complexities of the tracking environment.Furthermore, the development of transgenic zebrafish enables targeted studies on the effects of mutations in specific tissues or organs (Udvadia and Linney, 2003).This contrasts with vertebrate models like mice, where observing disease phenotypes, particularly at the organ and organ system levels, generally requires invasive methods like surgery or post-mortem examination.Beyond its optical transparency, the zebrafish model boasts several other advantages: external fertilization, rapid development, high fecundity, and straightforward breeding and maintenance protocols.These attributes collectively establish zebrafish as an exemplary model system for biomedical research (Choi et al., 2021).
Advancements in sequencing technologies culminating in the successful completion of the zebrafish genome sequencing project have revealed that zebrafish share high similarity with humans at the genetic level.Nearly 70-80% of the human genes possess at least one zebrafish ortholog (Howe et al., 2013).It also includes several known and putative genes for different neurodegenerative disorders, including MNDs.Manipulating the risk genes associated with MNDs is possible in zebrafish by applying forward or reverse genetic approaches (Dosch et al., 2004;Fassier et al., 2010).Although the invertebrate and mammalian systems are also ideal for these mutagenic strategies, there are disadvantages to using both of them.Despite the high degree of functional conservation in cell biological processes, which can be modeled successfully at the genetic and molecular levels, there is lack of some essential structures e.g.innervation patterns of muscles and the myelin sheath around neurons.These differences, especially the lack of myelin, impose limitations to the efficacy of flies in studying the pathogenesis of MNDs.Conversely, mice, which share high genomic and physiological conservation with humans, are not as feasible for large scale genetic screens due to the substantial manpower, infrastructure, and financial resources required.
In light of these constraints, such as limited personnel, funding, and infrastructure, zebrafish emerge as an exceptionally advantageous model.This advantage is epitomized by the rapid development of its central nervous system (CNS), which becomes fully functional within 72 h post fertilization (hpf) (Fulwiler and Gilbert, 1991;Kimmel et al., 1995;Blader and Strähle, 2000;Schmidt et al., 2013).Complementing this rapid development, the zebrafish embryo's optical transparency during the development period allows for high-resolution live imaging of the entire CNS (Hasani et al., 2023).This capability not only facilitates detailed observation but also underscores a significant aspect of zebrafish research: the striking similarity between the anatomical structure and function of the zebrafish and mammalian brains (Fulwiler and Gilbert, 1991;Blader and Strähle, 2000;Howe et al., 2013;Schmidt et al., 2013).This resemblance extends to neural circuitry and neuroendocrine functions, with a notable conservation of the neurotransmitter system across species.Key neurotransmitters, including serotonin (5-HT), dopamine (DA), histamine (HA), acetylcholine (ACh), glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) are synthesized similarly in both zebrafish and mammals (Kaslin and Panula, 2001;Panula et al., 2006;Wasel and Freeman, 2020).Despite these advantages, neuroscientists often express concern regarding the use of zebrafish for modeling MNDs, primarily due to the absence of corticospinal and rubrospinal tract in this model organism.This absence potentially limits the zebrafish's capacity to replicate the clinical phenotypes of the patients (Babin et al., 2014).Furthermore, there are organizational and functional differences in the motor neurons of zebrafish and humans.Human motor neurons in the spinal cord are organized in specific motor columns along a medial-lateral axis, targeting different muscle groups for movement (Miall, 2022).This precise topography is crucial for the coordinated control of complex motor functions and is a characteristic shared with other mammals but not with more basal vertebrates (Fetcho, 1992).In contrast, spinal motor neurons in zebrafish are categorized into primary motor neurons (PMNs) and secondary motor neurons (SMNs) based on their timing and target musculature.SMNs have smaller somatas, thinner axons, and they are localized more ventrally in the motor column, functioning to regulate the speed of rhythmic swimming (Myers, 1985;Myers et al., 1986).Contrarily, PMNs which control escape movement are further divided into three subtypes, caudal, middle and rostral primary motor neurons, based on the soma position and specific axonal pathways within the spinal cord (Myers et al., 1986;Westerfield et al., 1986).While the PMNs fire action potentials at ultrahigh frequency, SMNs do so at lower frequency and are prone to frequent failure (Wang and Brehm, 2017;Wen et al., 2020).However, an intriguing aspect of zebrafish neuroanatomy offers a potential bridge to this gap: the presence of Mauthner cells in their hindbrain.Mauthner cells, the fastest motor neurons known, govern the rapid escape reflex called the C-start response (Eaton et al., 1977;Faber and Korn, 1978).Intriguingly, these cells maintain projections to the lumbar spinal cord in adult amphibians even after metamorphosis (Will, 1986;Davis and Farel, 1990).These results signify that Mauthner cells could have a similar role in adult amphibians and thus could serve as a functional reminiscent of the corticospinal tract.
Ongoing research aimed at unraveling the role of Mauthner cells in zebrafish and adult amphibians could open new avenues for using zebrafish more effectively in modeling neurodegenerative diseases, especially the MNDs.Leveraging the structural and functional conservation of the zebrafish and mammalian system, researchers developed numerous zebrafish models for genetic disorders including neurodegenerative disorders (Naef et al., 2019;Chia et al., 2022).These models, generated through labor and cost-effective genetic screens, are instrumental in advancing our understanding of such disorder.
A key advantage of using zebrafish lies in its efficacy for highthroughput, inexpensive drug screening.In the last 20-25 years, zebrafish has emerged as a valuable model for understanding disease mechanisms and bridging the gap between in-vitro assays and mammalian drug screening (Lieschke and Currie, 2007;Patten et al., 2014).Zebrafish have consistently demonstrated that compounds effective in human and mouse systems exhibit similar activity and pharmacokinetic properties in zebrafish (MacRae and Peterson, 2015).Zebrafish has been widely used for both in-vitro and in-vivo drug screening.While the in-vitro, which focuses on the disruption of validated targets, works well in the early stages, they often fall short at advanced levels.The major drawback of such target-based approaches is that they usually modify the molecular target rather than the disease phenotype.Conversely, in-vivo in zebrafish is to identify the compounds that alter the disease phenotype on an organismic level, rather than solely focusing on a specific molecular target (Zon and Peterson, 2005).Despite discovering numerous new compounds from drug screens in zebrafish, the pivotal question remains: how effectively will these drugs translate to human treatments?Preliminary findings suggest a high level of conservation in drug responses between zebrafish and humans.While mammalian models remain the gold standard for testing the efficacy of drugs, particularly in late stages, zebrafish studies offer a rapid and cost-effective method for the preliminary evaluation of compounds with therapeutic potential (Patton et al., 2021).

Zebrafish toolbox for genetic manipulation
Optical transparency of embryos and larvae during development and a high degree of synteny of the zebrafish genes to the human sequences makes zebrafish a particularly amenable model for studying a variety of human genetic disorders, including MNDs.The methods available to make genetic manipulations in the zebrafish genome are broadly classified into three categories: . Forward genetic methods Forward genetics is a phenotype-based approach used for determining the genetic basis of a particular phenotype or trait of interest (Driever et al., 1996;Haffter et al., 1996).The phenotype is caused by random mutagenesis through chemicals, radiations or retroviral methods (Figure 2).To generate mutants with the chemical method, male fish are exposed to mutagen N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU), which induces point mutations in the coding or non-coding regions of the genome.Thanks to their notable resistance to mutagen toxicity, zebrafish enable the targeted mutation of specific loci, a feat that proves challenging in other vertebrate models (Driever et al., 1996;Haffter et al., 1996;Wienholds et al., 2002;Dosch et al., 2004).Additionally, mutagenesis using retroviral methods has shown considerable success in zebrafish.This approach circumvents the labor-intensive process of positional cloning often necessary in forward genetic screens (Amsterdam et al., 1999(Amsterdam et al., , 2004).Among the various techniques for forward genetic screens, the use of radiation is the least explored.Nevertheless, studies have demonstrated the efficacy of gamma rays as a mutagen, striking specific loci with a rate of approximately 1:100, making it a potent tool in zebrafish genetic research (Chakrabarti et al., 1983;Walker and Streisinger, 1983;Lu et al., 2007).The crux of the forward genetic approach is its ability to generate mutants with distinct phenotypes, easily observable in the transparent embryos and larvae of zebrafish without the need

FIGURE
The diagram highlights di erent methods available for the genetic manipulation of zebrafish genome.The forward genetic approaches includes mutagenesis via chemicals such as N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU), retroviral methods and radiation.The reverse genetic methods include overexpression, injection of morpholinos, zinc finger nucleases and transcription activator like e ectors (TALEN).It also includes mutagenesis via targeting induced local lesions in genomes (TILLING) and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-crispr associated protein (CRISPR-Cas ).Further, the illustration shows that transgenesis via Tol transposon system is also a method often used to manipulate the zebrafish genome for understanding the role of the risk genes associated with motor neuron and other diseases.
for advanced instruments and facilities.This method is particularly effective for creating mutations in genes that are orthologous to human genes implicated in the pathogenesis of genetic disorders, including MNDs.For instance, Dosch et al. (2004) employed a maternal effect mutant screen using ENU in zebrafish, leading to the identification of four mutants: ruehrei p25ca , over easy p37ad , sunny side up p144dc , souffle p96re , all exhibiting a specific opaque egg phenotype.These mutants resemble the appearance of immature stage IV oocytes, pointing to a potential defect in oogenesis (Dosch et al., 2004).
Interestingly, Kanagaraj et al. (2014) established that souffle is the zebrafish ortholog of the HSP-associated gene ZFYVE26, which codes for the protein SPASTIZIN.The souffle mutants possess a single-point mutation in the splice donor site, resulting in a frameshift and production of a shortened 2,270 amino acid Spastizin protein.Notably, while larvae and adult souffle mutants exhibit very mild locomotion defects, a more severe mutation in zfyve26 results in mutants that not only share the opaque egg phenotype but also display slower swimming compared to their wild-type counterparts.These forward genetic screens are immensely beneficial, as any mutants displaying similar phenotype, are immediately highlighted as the potential disease model, in this case, for HSP.Once validated as models for HSP, these mutants offer valuable insights into the molecular and cellular basis of the pathogenesis of this complex disorder.

. Reverse genetic methods
Unlike forward genetics, which explores the genetic basis of a phenotype, reverse genetics starts with a known gene and investigates its function by analyzing the phenotypic effects of specific genetic manipulations.In zebrafish research, several methods are available for modifying the zebrafish orthologs of human disease genes (Figure 2).One of the simplest strategies for investigating gene function in the optically transparent embryos and larvae involves either overexpression using mRNA or knockdown by antisense morpholino oligonucleotides (MOs).Both methods have been instrumental in investigating genes affected in MNDs.For example, Fassier et al. (2010) employed both methods to explore the role of Atlastin-1 in the pathogenesis of HSP.Their findings revealed that the knockdown of atlastin-1 resulted in a significant reduction in larval motility, increased branching of spinal motor axons, and marked upregulation of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling pathway.Conversely, overexpression of atlastin-1 inhibited the BMP signaling.However, major limitations of the MO injection include incomplete knockdown, off-target deleterious effects and transient expression, which may not manifest in juvenile and adult stages.
Advancements in technologies like zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effectors (TALENs), and targeting-induced local lesions in genomes (TILLING) have significantly enhanced the precision and efficiency of targeted mutagenesis and gene function ablation in zebrafish.ZFNs function by coupling a zinc finger DNA-binding domain with a DNA cleavage domain, specifically developed to target and cleave precise DNA sequences within the genome (Ekker, 2008).TALENs operate through a similar mechanism, where transcription activator-like (TAL) effector DNA binding domains are fused to DNA cleavage domains, functioning as bespoke restriction enzymes (Huang et al., 2016).TILLING, another popular method among zebrafish researchers, merges chemical mutagenesis with sensitive DNA screening, effectively pinpointing point mutations in targeted genes (Moens et al., 2008).Although all these methods have come up as efficient alternatives against MO injections, they have their own limitations as they are complex and costly.Until now, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR associated protein 9 (CRISPR-Cas9) has turned out to be the most efficient technique for targeted gene knockout in zebrafish (Hwang et al., 2013;Irion et al., 2014;Li et al., 2016;Liu et al., 2019a;Uribe-Salazar et al., 2022).This method is substantially used for producing both knockout and knock-in mutants.It comprises two key components: guide RNA and Cas9.The guide RNA is designed to match the desired target gene, while Cas9 induces a doublestranded DNA break.Together, these elements facilitate precise genome modification at a desired destination.Previous studies have reported the issue of off-target toxicity while using this method.Still, great effort has been put in recently to improve the specificity of Cas9 and to broaden the target coverage of the CRISPR nucleases (Liu et al., 2019a).
Several zebrafish models of MNDs have been developed recently using the CRISPR-Cas9 system.Armstrong et al. ( 2016) modeled ALS in zebrafish by creating site-specific single nucleotide mutations for the first time in two ALS-related genes tardbp and fus using CRISPR-Cas9 mediated homology-directed repair by coinjection of single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide donor templates (ssODN) with gRNA and Cas9 mRNA.In another study, Voisard et al. (2022) developed a stable constitutive valosin-containing protein (vcp) knockout zebrafish model and showed that loss of vcp affects protein homoestasis followed by the impairment of cardiac and skeletal muscle function.In addition, zebrafish models exhibiting a loss of function for tumor protein 73 (tp73) and transactive response DNA binding protein of 43 kDa (tdp-43) have been developing using CRISPR-Cas9 (Bose et al., 2019a;Russell et al., 2021).These models display hallmark features of ALS pathology including disturbances in motor neuron development and abnormalities in axon morphology.

. Transgenic methods
Diverging from both forward and reverse genetics, transgenesis in zebrafish enables the targeted expression of human disease genes, offering precise control over their spatial and temporal dynamics in the study of motor neuron diseases.Transgenesis stands as a distinct approach in zebrafish models for the detailed exploration of human motor neuron diseases (Balciunas et al., 2006).This technique hinges on the introduction of human disease genes into zebrafish, a process efficiently executed through Tol2 transposon system (Figure 2).Injection of Tol2 constructs along with promoters for neural-specific expression in the fertilized oocytes leads to the generation of zebrafish models expressing disease-causing genes in desired parts of the nervous system (Kawakami, 2004;Suster et al., 2009).Transgenesis via the Gal4-UAS is another effective method for observing the effects of human mutations in the zebrafish system (Asakawa and Kawakami, 2008;Halpern et al., 2008).Both methods help control the timing, .
/fnins. .location and quantity of disease gene expression, thereby avoiding the possibility of lethality due to ectopic or toxic overexpression.Hao et al. (2011) generated transgenic zebrafish expressing human survival motor neuron (hSMN2) gene whose low levels cause SMA.They showed that the splicing mechanism for SMN2 is conserved in zebrafish, like in mice and humans.Furthermore, their research revealed that injecting antisense morpholinos (MOs) targeting the intronic splicing silencer site resulted in a notable elevation in the levels of full-length SMN.When introduced into an smn mutant background, this increase in SMN successfully ameliorated the neuromuscular defect associated with the presynaptic synaptic vesicle protein 2 (SV2).Notably, it prolonged the survival of the mutant zebrafish.

Hereditary spastic paraplegia
Hereditary Spastic Paraplegias (HSPs) are a clinically diverse group of inheritable neurodegenerative disorders in which people suffer from lower limb spasticity and weakness, resulting from the length-dependent degeneration of upper motor neurons in the corticospinal tract (Harding, 1984(Harding, , 1993;;Fink, 2006Fink, , 2014;;Klebe et al., 2015;Tesson et al., 2015).With over 88 genes and 100 distinct spastic gait disease loci identified as causative factors for Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia (HSP) (Galatolo et al., 2018;Parodi et al., 2018;Elsayed et al., 2021), patients continue to face a dire situation due to the lack of a definitive cure.However, some therapeutics are available to alleviate the pathology in human patients.Interestingly, HSP genes are involved in several cellular processes, including endoplasmic reticulum (ER) morphogenesis, endosomal trafficking, lipid metabolism, mitochondrial regulation, myelination, autophagy, etc. (Blackstone, 2012(Blackstone, , 2018)).Despite the diverse cellular processes implicated, the inheritance of HSP genes is equally varied, encompassing autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, X-linked and maternal patterns (Finsterer et al., 2012).Nearly 10-40% cases of the autosomal dominant form of HSP are due to mutations in ATLASTIN-1 and SPASTIN, respectively.Atlastin-1 is a GTPase required for ER morphogenesis and BMP signaling.Moreover, it is involved in vesicle trafficking and neurite outgrowth (Liu et al., 2019b).Conversely, Spastin is a microtubule severing AAA ATPase protein which also plays a role in ER morphogenesis, BMP signaling, endosomal trafficking, and cytokinesis (Hazan et al., 1999;Errico et al., 2002).In addition, Spastin is furthermore required for motor axon outgrowth.Interestingly, Atlastin-1 and Spastin also interact with each other and coordinate microtubule interactions with the tubular ER network (Evans et al., 2006;Sanderson et al., 2006).The two most common forms of autosomal recessive HSP are SPG11 and SPG15, caused by mutations in SPATACSIN and SPASTIZIN, respectively.Spatacsin and Spastizin share similarities in their expression patterns and interact with each other and play a pivotal role in endosomal trafficking and the generation of new lysosomes (Chang et al., 2014).Mutations in MCT8 and L1CAM are associated with the X-linked form of HSP.Monocarboxylate transporter 8 (MCT8) is a transporter of a variety of iodothyronine, including thyroid hormones T3 and T4 (Friesema et al., 2003).L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) is a transmembrane protein implicated in cell adhesion, migration, myelination, neurite extension and differentiation (Kiefel et al., 2012).
Zebrafish have risen to prominence as a valuable model for simulating HSP research with over 40 studies published to date (Naef et al., 2019).Despite the absence of a corticospinal tract, limiting its ability to fully mimic HSP pathology in humans, zebrafish models have successfully exhibited key pathological features of HSP patients, such as impaired locomotion, disrupted motor axon growth, and axonal transport issues (Table 1).For instance, atl1 mutation in zebrafish results in markedly reduced larval locomotion, increased branching of spinal motor axons, and upregulation of the BMP signaling pathway; its overexpression leads to inhibition of the BMP signaling (Fassier et al., 2010).Similarly, spastin morphants also possess locomotion defects along with a curly tail phenotype, shorter and disordered axons, defects in motor axon outgrowth, and disorganization and thinning of microtubule networks in the spinal cord (Wood et al., 2006;Julien et al., 2016).Furthermore, targeting two Spastin isoforms DrM1 and DrM61 leads to reduced swimming speed and distinct phenotypic changes such as curly tails in DrM1 mutants and smaller eyes and yolk tube agenesis in DrM61 mutants, with embryos from both failing to hatch (Jardin et al., 2018).
Mutations in kinesin family member 5A (KIF5A), which plays a crucial role in the axonal transport of cargos, cause SPG10 in nearly 3% of families.Mutations in kif5a in zebrafish lead to larval lethality, reduced touch response, inflated swim bladder, and sensory and motor deficits (Campbell et al., 2014;Auer et al., 2015).Another autosomal dominant form of HSP, SPG8, is caused by mutations in STRUMPELLIN which is involved in endosomal trafficking.Zebrafish strumpellin morphants possess impaired motility, curly tails, extended heart cavity, pericardial edema, and either shorter spinal cord motor and interneurons with abnormal branching or a loss of central and peripheral motorneuron formation (Valdmanis et al., 2007;Clemen et al., 2010).
SEIPIN, an ER protein involved in lipid metabolism, is another protein involved in HSP pathogenesis.Although seipin mutant zebrafish lack any morphological deformities or motor neuron loss, they exhibit indeed slower swimming.seipin mutants possess reduced triglyceride content in the developing head (Hölttä-Vuori et al., 2013).Similar phenotypes are observed with knockdowns of other ER proteins, such as acetyl-CoA transporters, leading to curved tails and axon outgrowth anomalies.A newly identified autosomal dominant HSP gene is ubiquitin-associated protein 1 (UBAP1).A truncating mutation in ubap1 resulted in truncated and misshaped axons in the fluorescently labeled motor neurons of transgenic Tg(olig2::DsRed) zebrafish embryos at 48 hpf (Fard et al., 2019).In another recent study, knockdown of ubap1 in zebrafish leads to abnormalities in morphology, decreased movement, shorter life span and inhibition of motor neuron outgrowth (Lin et al., 2019).
Studies on zebrafish have extensively explored the effects of mutations in genes associated with autosomal recessive forms of HSP.Notably, mutations in alsin, integral for vesicle trafficking in neurons, result in developmental and behavioral defects in zebrafish embryos (Gros-Louis et al., 2008).MO-mediated knockdown of spatacsin in zebrafish leads to a range of abnormalities including reduced motility or paralysis, aberrant  (2014) found that while zygotic spastizin mutants do not possess any defects in locomotion and axonal outgrowth, they possess defects in secretory vesicle maturation during oogenesis.Other less common types of autosomal recessive HSP include SPG39, SPG46, SPG52, SPG53, SPG76, as well as mutations in kinesin light chain 2 (KLC2), phosphate cytidylyltransferase 2, ethanolamine (PCYT2), autocrine motility factor receptor (AMFR), ubiquitin E3 ligase RNF170, Human 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase-like (HPDL), and Coenzyme Q4 (COQ4) have also been identified.SPG39 arising from mutations in patatinlike phospholipase domain containing 6 (PNPLA6) leads to developmental abnormalities and axonal transport issues in zebrafish morphants (Song et al., 2013;Hufnagel et al., 2015).Mutation in SPG46 gene glucosylceramidase β2 (GBA2) involved in lipid metabolism, results in abnormal locomotion and impaired axonal outgrowth in zebrafish morphants (Martin et al., 2013).SPG52 is caused due to mutations in AP4S1, σ 4 subunit of the adaptor protein complex 4 (AP-4).MO-mediated knockdown of ap4s1 in zebrafish leads to abnormalities in CNS development and neuronal excitability followed by locomotion defects (DAmore et al., 2020).CRISPR induced mutation in ap4s1 also causes motor impairment as well as delay in neurodevelopment and degeneration of distal axons (Li et al., 2023).SPG53 is caused by mutations in vacuolar protein sorting 37 homolog A (VPS37A).VPS37A is part of the endosomal sorting complex required for the transport (ESCRT) system, which is involved in intracellular trafficking, protein sorting, and maturation of multivesicular bodies.Mutation in vps37a causes severe loss of motility in zebrafish morphant embryos (Zivony-Elboum et al., 2012).Furthermore, SPG76 is caused by a mutation in CAPN1, which encodes CALPAIN-1.CALPAIN-1 is widely expressed in CNS and essential for the maintenance of axonal and synaptic plasticity.Injection of capn1a-mo in a transgenic zebrafish line Tg(islet1::GFP) expressing the green fluorescent protein (GFP) in motor neurons resulted in abnormalities in the organization of the axonal network and branchiomotor neuron migration (Gan-Or et al., 2016).KLC2 mutations also serves as a cause for autosomal recessive form of HSP.Effects of both knockdown and overexpression of the gene have been studied in zebrafish, and mutants showed mild to severe curly tail phenotype (Melo et al., 2015).Mutations in genes governing lipid metabolism also cause autosomal recessive HSP.PCYT2 encodes an enzyme for phosphatidylethanolamine synthesis, a major membrane lipid in the brain.pcyt2 knockout zebrafish, created by targeting exon 3 showed higher mortality compared to the one created by targeting the final exon 13.The pcyt2_13 mutants had a higher survival rate but possessed an overall small size and abnormal tail fin morphology (Vaz et al., 2019).AMFR codes for a RING-H2 finger E3 ubiquitin ligase which is anchored at the ER membrane.amfr zebrafish mutants are shorter in length, exhibit aberrant ER morphology and lipid accumulation in brain, followed by abnormal motor neuron branching and aberrant touch evoked escape response (Deng et al., 2023).Interestingly, MOmediated knockdown of another E3 ubiquitin ligase gene rnf170 in zebrafish causes loss of motility and developmental defects including microphthalmia, microcephaly (Wagner et al., 2019).hpdl is an iron-containing non-heme oxygenase, localized to the outer mitochondrial membrane, whose knockdown resulted in abnormal locomotor behavior in zebrafish larvae (Wiessner et al., 2021).Using "crispant" approach, Mero et al. (2021) showed that coq4 mutant fish exhibit motor defects and Purkinje cell reduction in a specific hindbrain area, which is a reminiscent of the human cerebellum.These findings were supported by a very recent study in which Lin et al. (2023) also showed that knockdown of coq4 leads to severe motor dysfunction in zebrafish.
Mutations in mct8 are associated with defects in neural circuit assembly, reduced locomotion and anomalies in the expression of myelin-related genes in zebrafish.Subsequent analysis of the mct8 mutants revealed disturbances in the myelination process, characterized by increased Schwann cells in the trunk and a concurrent decrease of oligodendrocytes in the brain and spinal cord (Zada et al., 2014(Zada et al., , 2016)).Similarly, knockdown of l1cam in zebrafish caused myelination abnormalities, changes in axonal outgrowth and development of hydrocephalus (Linneberg et al., 2019).
In conclusion, zebrafish models have been instrumental in advancing our understanding of Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia (HSP), a group of neurodegenerative disorders characterized by lower limb spasticity and weakness.Despite the absence of a corticospinal tract, these models have successfully mimicked key pathological features of HSP, including impaired locomotion and motor axon outgrowth.Research has identified mutations in various genes, such as ATLASTIN-1, SPASTIN, SPASTIZIN, and SPATACSIN, and their diverse roles in cellular processes like ER morphogenesis, endosomal trafficking, and lipid metabolism, contributing to HSP pathogenesis.Future research should focus on deeper molecular and cellular studies, especially on how these genetic mutations disrupt specific neuronal pathways.Developing targeted gene therapies and further exploring the role of these genes in motor neuron biology could pave the way for new treatment strategies.Additionally, the creation of more advanced zebrafish models that can better mimic the human condition of HSP would greatly contribute to understanding the disease's progression and testing potential therapeutics.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), commonly known as Lou Gehrig's disease is a neurodegenerative disorder, characterized by the progressive loss of the upper and lower motor neurons (Kiernan et al., 2011;Brown and Al-Chalabi, 2017).This deterioration leads to muscle weakness, atrophy, spasticity, followed by paralysis and eventually death due to respiratory failure.The disease's incidence stands at approximately 2-3 per 10,000 individuals (Loeffler et al., 2016;Grad et al., 2017;Matsubara et al., 2019).ALS is broadly classified into two categories: sporadic and familial.The sporadic form accounts for about 90% of ALS cases, with the remaining 10% being familial (Kiernan et al., 2011;Brown and Al-Chalabi, 2017).Intriguingly, despite the identification of over 40 genes linked to ALS pathogenesis, mutations in just four genessuperoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), TARDBP (which encodes the TAR DNA-binding protein-43 [TDP-43]), fused in sarcoma (FUS), and chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9ORF72)-are responsible for approximately 70% of familial ALS cases (Al-Chalabi et al., 2017;Roggenbuck et al., 2017).
Superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), a widely expressed antioxidizing enzyme, is implicated in nearly 20% of familial and 1.7% sporadic ALS cases.Identified in the early 1990s as the first ALS-related gene and extensively studied through numerous mouse models, the exact mechanism by which SOD1 mutations trigger motor neuron degeneration remains elusive.Evidences so far suggest that a toxic gain-of-function mechanism might be responsible for the pathogenesis of ALS due to mutations in SOD1 (Peggion et al., 2022).Another gene, TARDBP encodes a nuclear DNA-and RNA-binding protein called TDP-43, a protein integral to RNA processing and metabolism, operating both at the nuclear DNA and RNA levels.Mutations in TARDBP, leading to an accumulation of TDP-43 in inclusion bodies, account for nearly 3% of familial and 1.5% of sporadic ALS cases (Berning and Walker, 2019).Similarly, Fused in Sarcoma (FUS), another nuclear DNA-and RNA-binding protein involved in RNA processing, including transcription and splicing, plays a significant role in ALS.Mutations in FUS lead to its mislocalisation from nucleus to the cytoplasm, which causes its aggregation in the inclusion bodies (Lattante et al., 2013).A prominent genetic factor is the extensive expansion of GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeats in the non-coding first intron of C9ORF72, accounting for nearly 40% of familial and 7% of sporadic ALS cases.While repeat expansions are the primary cause of motor neuron degeneration in C9ORF72-related ALS, the loss of function due to haploinsufficiency of C9ORF72 is also suggested to contribute significantly to the disease's progression (Stepto et al., 2014;Balendra and Isaacs, 2018).
. /fnins. .The seminal study examining the effects of sod1 mutations in zebrafish was conducted 16 years ago by Lemmens et al. (2007).They discovered that mutant human SOD1 overexpression leads to specific and dose-dependent motor axonopathy in zebrafish embryos.Subsequent research demonstrated similar neurodegenerative effects (Table 2).For instance, transient overexpression of G93A SOD1 mutation in zebrafish caused degeneration of neuromuscular junctions (NMJs) and defects in motor neuron outgrowth and axonal branching (Sakowski et al., 2012).Robinson et al. (2019) observed analogous effects, including spinal motor axon shortening and atypical branching, upon overexpression of mutated human SOD1 in zebrafish larvae.Notably, a novel sod1 T70I zebrafish model developed using ENU mutagenesis and TILLING exhibits motor pathology symptoms, including motor neuron loss, susceptibility to oxidative stress, altered NMJ morphology and motor impairment in adult fish (Da Costa et al., 2014).These motor pathologies, initially observed in transient mutant human SOD1 overexpression models, were further validated in stable transgenic zebrafish lines.Ramesh et al. (2010) developed two G93R sod1 mutant lines which displayed NMJ defects at larval and adult stages, decreased swimming endurance during adulthood, and muscle atrophy, motor neuron loss at the end stage, ultimately leading to premature death.Benedetti et al. (2016) also reported similar pathological features in larval and adult zebrafish through stable expression of G93R mutation.Moreover, Sakowski et al. ( 2012) developed a stable transgenic zebrafish line expressing G93A-sod1 mutation and observed common pathologies such as loss of NMJs, motor neuron degeneration, reduced activity, and altered motor behavior.To investigate the correlation between motor axonopathy and locomotion defects in the sod1 mutant fish, Robinson et al. (2019) injected transgenic zebrafish embryos expressing blue fluorescent protein (mTagBFP) in motor neurons with mutant Sod1 mRNA.Larvae injected with mutant Sod1 mRNA possessed significantly shorter and more aberrantly branched motor axons.Additionally, these larvae could only swim short distances compared to controls.This observation links genetic mutations directly to motor function impairments.
Antisense morpholino mediated knockdown of tardbp led to a reduction in axon length and abnormal branching followed by impairment of tail coiling ability and loss of touch evoked escape response (Kabashi et al., 2010).Similar effects were observed by the overexpression of three separate TARDBP mutations (A315T, A382T, and G348C) in the zebrafish embryos along with the loss of 50% of the motor neurons (Kabashi et al., 2010).Studies by Armstrong and Drapeau (2013a) and Lissouba et al. (2018) found that the G348C mutation in larvae impaired swimming and affected NMJ structures.As the single deletion of one ortholog  , 2007).A recent study in zebrafish revealed that MO-mediated knockdown of TDP-43 disrupts the splicing of NEFL zebrafish ortholog neflb, as the overexpression of one isoform of neflb rescued the reduction in the motor neuron axon length of TDP-43 knockdown embryos, while the other isoform exacerbated the phenotypes (Demy et al., 2020).Zebrafish models have been instrumental in the study of FUS, a gene linked to ALS (Table 2).Dormann et al. (2010) and Bosco et al. (2010) recapitulated the prominent features of FUS pathology by injecting human mutant mRNA P525L and R495X, respectively in the zebrafish embryos.The overexpression of the P525L mutation in the spinal cord neurons and muscle cells leads to inhibition of the nuclear import and aggregation of FUS in the cytoplasm.The R495X mutation exhibited similar phenotypes, with oxidative stress or heat shock treatments causing fus mutants to accumulate in perinuclear stress granules.Both knockdown of zebrafish fus and overexpression of the human FUS mutation R521H induced motor phenotype characterized by a reduced axonal length and aberrant motor behavior in embryos (Kabashi et al., 2011).Armstrong and Drapeau (2013b), observed related phenotypes in larvae including increased motor neuron excitability, reduced synaptic fidelity of the NMJ and shorter swimming duration.Homozygous mutants with a deletion mutation in fus, which leads to reduced production of Fus protein, also exhibited similar phenotypes, including reduced life span.These effects were linked to altered expression of acetylcholine receptor (AChR) subunits and histone deacetylase 4, paralleling denervation, and reinnervation processes seen in ALS (Bourefis et al., 2020).Contrastingly, a CRISPR knockout model of fus in zebrafish did not show any axonopathy and motor deficits, confirming that the effect of fus mutation is caused either due to its impaired loss of function or mislocalised gain of function (Lebedeva et al., 2017).
Researchers have been using zebrafish to study how a particular genetic change, known as the hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9orf72, affects neuron development (Table 2).MO-mediated knockdown of c9orf72 results in motor axonopathy and locomotion defects at larval stages as demonstrated by Ciura et al. (2013) and Yeh et al. (2018).Recently, a stable loss of function c9orf72 zebrafish model has been developed.This model revealed that reduced C9orf72 expression causes motor neuron loss, locomotion defects, muscle atrophy, and abnormalities in the structure and function of NMJ, including impaired synaptic vesicle trafficking and release, culminating in early larval and adult mortality (Butti et al., 2021).Gain-of-function mutations in c9orf72 lead to the formation of RNA foci or dipeptide repeat (DPR) proteins.Shaw et al. (2018) developed stable transgenic lines which expressed C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansions.Interestingly, both mutants developed RNA foci and DPRs and exhibited features similar to those of loss-of-function mutants.These mutants also demonstrated that repeat expansions activate the heat shock response (HSR), leading to further progression of the disease phenotypes in the fish.Swinnen et al. (2018) revealed that while both, RNA toxicity and DPR toxicity induced motor axonopathy, repeat RNA toxicity is independent of DPR formation.Lee et al. (2013) showed that RNA foci also contribute to apoptotic cell death in zebrafish embryos and determined that RNA toxicity may affect RNA processing, contributing to neuron loss and degeneration.Investigating the neurotoxicity of the poly-Gly-Ala (poly-GA) DPR, most frequently found in ALS patient brains, Ohki et al. (2017) confirmed its detrimental effects using a transgenic approach.In a contrasting study, Swaminathan et al. (2018) found GR DPR to be the most toxic while GA to be the least toxic.Notably, their study revealed that the expression of 1,000 repeats of any DPR, whether GA or GR, led to locomotion defects in zebrafish.They then developed a transgenic line stably expressing 100 GR repeats and confirmed that GR DPRs are also neurotoxic and particularly affect motor neuron function.
In conclusion, extensive research utilizing zebrafish models has significantly advanced our understanding of ALS, revealing key insights into the genetic and molecular underpinnings of this devastating disease.Studies have elucidated the roles of critical genes like SOD1, TARDBP, FUS, and C9ORF72 in ALS pathogenesis, highlighting mechanisms such as toxic gain-offunction, RNA toxicity, and the impact of genetic mutations on motor neuron health and functionality.The zebrafish models have been pivotal in demonstrating how these genetic alterations lead to motor neuron degeneration, muscular atrophy, and locomotion defects, closely mirroring the human condition.Future research directions should focus on disentangling the precise cellular pathways affected by these mutations, further exploring the potential of gene therapy, and identifying novel therapeutic targets.This could involve detailed studies on RNA processing and synaptic function in motor neurons, as well as the development of more advanced zebrafish models to simulate the disease's progression and response to potential treatments.The ultimate goal remains to translate these findings into effective clinical therapies for ALS, potentially halting or reversing the course of this currently incurable condition.

Spinal muscular atrophy
Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder.It is characterized by the loss of lower alpha motor neurons, progressive muscle weakness and premature death (D'Amico et al., 2011).The primary cause of SMA is mutations in the survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene.This gene encodes a protein that is ubiquitously expressed in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm.The SMN1 protein has a crucial role in the assembly of small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs), necessary for pre-mRNA splicing (Lefebvre et al., 1995;Burghes and Beattie, 2009;Koh et al., 2021).Interestingly, it also possess a potential role in the transport of mRNA in neurons (Burghes and Beattie, 2009).The severity of SMA progression hinges upon the amount of protein produced by survival motor neuron 2 (SMN2), which varies among individuals due to differences in copy numbers.SMN2 is nearly identical to SMN1 and also encodes for the SMN protein.However, a nucleotide difference at position 6 in exon 7 alters the splicing pattern of the SMN2.This alteration results in the production of an unstable truncated protein (Pellizzoni et al., 1998;Lorson et al., 1999;Monani et al., 1999;Lorson and Androphy, 2000).Based on the amount of residual functional protein present, SMA is categorized into four different types, with a single copy in type I (severe) to four or more copies in type IV (adult onset) (Zerres et al., 1997;D'Amico et al., 2011).
To advance the understanding of SMA's pathophysiology, researchers developed various zebrafish models (Table 3).In these models, MO reduces Smn levels in zebrafish embryos.This reduction leads to defects in motor axon outgrowth and pathfinding (McWhorter et al., 2003;Winkler et al., 2005;Carrel et al., 2006;Oprea et al., 2008).Further research by Carrel et al. (2006) revealed that the smn transient morphants were rescued by wild type human SMN RNA.However, RNA from smn2 and human SMN mutations did not rescue the phenotypes.They also discovered that smn's role in motor neurons is independent of its function in small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) assembly.In a contrasting study, Winkler et al. (2005) showed that silencing of smn expression in zebrafish arrested embryonic development and caused motor axon degeneration.Both phenotypes were rescued by the injection of purified snRNPs.This rescue suggests a direct link between snRNP assembly and motor axon degeneration in SMA patients.In a more recent study, Laird et al. ( 2016) used an miR-mediated knockdown of smn1 to develop a transgenic zebrafish line.This line allowed for spatio-temporal control of smn1 expression.Their research demonstrated that the knockdown of smn1 in motor neurons alone was sufficient to reproduce the key characteristics of SMA.
Despite the ubiquitous expression of smn, its mutation-induced specificity for motor neurons remains unclear.To investigate smn's precise role in motor neurons, Boon et al. ( 2009) generated three smn mutations by TILING.Two of the mutations, smnY262stop and smnL265stop truncated exon 7, while the third one was a missense mutation complementary to a severe form of SMA in humans.Homozygous mutants with these mutant alleles were smaller in size and died within 2-3 weeks post fertilization.Notably, this was paralleled by a decrease in the synaptic vesicle protein SV2 in the neuromuscular system.Boon et al. ( 2009) created a smn mutant line which carries the human SMN protein exclusively in motoneurons.They found that the introduction of wild-type human SMN rescues the SV2 decrease in motor neurons.These findings established that smn is required to maintain the presynaptic integrity in the motor neurons.Spiró et al. (2016) used a different approach to study smn.They established a zebrafish culture system of GFP marked motorneurons (Spiró et al., 2016).They observed increased Smn levels in motorneurons and that additional Smn protein supply is necessary for proper axon formation.This highlights the dependence of motorneurons on Smn and may explain their increased vulnerability to smn mutations.Interestingly, not all motor neuron pools are equally affected in SMA.Mouse studies suggest that this selective vulnerability largely depends on the basal bioenergetic profile.Boyd et al. (2017), using zebrafish model, showed that defects in bioenergetic profiling are characteristic of SMA pathology (Boyd et al., 2017).They discovered that the targeting of genes involved in bioenergetic pathways rescues motor neuron outgrowth defects.This finding underscores the importance of such pathways as potential therapeutic targets.
Numerous studies established that smn mutations cause motor axon defects, yet it remains unclear why the motor units become dysfunctional.To address this issue, Hao et al. (2013) conducted a comprehensive analysis of motor neuron development in early embryonic stages in zebrafish system under low Smn levels.They observed that motor axons and dendrites were shorter and had fewer branches.The mutants possessed few filopodia, displayed locomotion defects, and had a shorter average half-life.This study confirms the role of Smn in the proper development of motor neuron axon and dendrites during early embryonic stages.
For a model to be accurately representative of SMA, it is crucial to replicate the dysfunction of SMN1 gene and include presence of SMN2 gene.However, SMN2 is exclusive to humans (Rochette et al., 2001), making the creation of an SMA model challenging.The most effective approach involves introducing the human SMN2 (hSMN2) gene as a transgene in an animal with a mutated smn1 gene.Hao et al. (2011) pioneered this method by generating a transgenic fish carrying the hSMN2 gene.When this transgene was introduced into an smn mutant background, it rescued the neuromuscular presynaptic SV2 defect and imporved their survival rate.In a groundbreaking study, Tay et al. (2021) attempted to simulate the intermediate type SMA in zebrafish.Using homology directed repair (HDR), they developed a zebrafish model possessing intermediate levels of Smn protein (Tay et al., 2021).Initially, the Smn protein levels were normal, but as they decreased significantly over time, the mutants exhibited neuromuscular junction (NMJ) deficiencies, reduced locomotion, muscular atrophy, and early adult mortality.This occurred despite normal motor neuron development and maintenance in the early stages.
In conclusion, the comprehensive studies on SMA using zebrafish models have significantly advanced our understanding of the disease's pathophysiology.These models have elucidated the critical role of the SMN1 and SMN2 genes in motor neuron development and maintenance, highlighting the consequences of SMN mutations at the molecular and cellular levels.The research demonstrates a clear link between SMN mutations and motor axon defects, presynaptic integrity, and the necessity of SMN protein for motor neuron survival.Despite these advances, the exact mechanism by which SMN mutations selectively impact motor neurons remains elusive.Future research should focus on unraveling this specificity, perhaps by investigating the bioenergetic profiles of motor neurons and exploring the potential

Drug screening in zebrafish model of MNDs
The escalating number of MND patient casualties annually hastens the demand for developing suitable drug targets.The aforementioned morphological, physiological, and behavioral attributes (see Section 2) make zebrafish ideal for large-scale in vivo bioassays in which embryos and larvae are exposed to a library of small molecules in multi-well plates (Figure 3).Furthermore, these assays enable assessments in the whole animal and the study of drug effects at the cellular or tissue level (Zon and Peterson, 2005;MacRae and Peterson, 2015;Patton et al., 2021).This is achievable through a combination of gene editing techniques with cell or tissue-specific reporters.Such studies pave the way for the development of novel drugs along with the remodeling of the available ones for personalized use.In the past few decades, zebrafish HSP mutants have been treated with several pharmacologically active molecules to discover the appropriate drug targets for effectively treating HSP patients (Table 4).Fassier et al. (2010) showed that treatment of atl1 morphant embryos with dorsomorphin, a pharmacological inhibitor of the BMP receptor kinase activity, was sufficient to rescue the locomotion and spinal motor axon defects.Similarly, Song et al. (2013) demonstrated the effectiveness of dorsomorphin in attenuating the over-activation of BMP signaling in pnpla6 morphants, suggesting its potential for clinical trials in treating spastic paraplegia (SPG) phenotypes caused by the disturbances in BMP signaling.Supporting this, Mao et al. (2015) also found dorsomorphin to be effective in rescuing the phenotypic defects in solute carrier family 33 member 1 (slc33a1) knockdown zebrafish, caused by the upregulated BMP receptor type 1A (BMPR1A) activity.In studies focusing on ER stress and proteotoxicity, compounds like phenazine, methylene blue, N-acetyl-cysteine, guanabenz, and salubrinal partially rescued the locomotion defects, microtubule defects, and oxidative stress in spast mutants (Julien et al., 2016).Oleic acid, an ER stress modulator, was found to alleviate motility defects and reduces ER stress in seipin N88S mutant larvae, which exhibit reduced triglyceride levels and impaired swimming activity (Hölttä-Vuori et al., 2013).
Miglustat, known for reducing GM2 ganglioside levels in mouse models of Sandhoff disease (Jeyakumar et al., 1999), was shown by Boutry et al. (2018) to correct gangliosides accumulation in lysosomes and motor phenotypes in zebrafish with inhibited spatacsin expression.They further showed that inhibition of spatacsin expression in zebrafish larvae leads to a motor phenotype and strong GM2 staining in telencephalon.Interestingly, treatment with miglustat reduced paralysis and corrected GM2 staining in the larvae.This finding suggests potential novel therapeutics for MNDs linked to lysosomal dysfunction.Additionally, a limited number of drugs have also been tested for some rare forms of HSP using zebrafish as a model.Use of FDA-approved statinssimvastatin (SMV) and atorvastatin (ATV) improved length, axon branching defects and touch-evoked escape response in amfra homozygous mutant larvae (Deng et al., 2023).In their studies, Zada et al. (2014Zada et al. ( , 2016) ) demonstrated that thyroid hormone analogs and clemastine partially rescued neurological phenotypes and hypomyelination in mct8-/-mutants.Their results open up the prospects of exploring the potential of zebrafish for large scale drug screening for identifying more compounds of therapeutic potential.Another intriguing study demonstrated how the drugs tested in yeast can also rescue the phenotypes in zebrafish.Heins-Marroquin et al. ( 2019) developed a zebrafish model of atp13a2 whose mutations are casually linked to HSP.They found that partial or complete loss of atp13a2 increases Mn2+ sensitivity in zebrafish.The effects were reduced by two drugs, N-acetylcysteine and furaltadone, which were already tested in yeast for their therapeutic potential.
Zebrafish mutants for ALS disease genes have been extensively used to test the potential of several drugs for the treatment of this devastating MND (Table 4).McGown et al. (2013) showed that exposure to riluzole, the only approved drug for ALS and apomorphine, a nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) activator, reduced early neuronal stress response in the transgenic mutant sod1 fish.Benedetti et al. (2016) supported these findings by demonstrating riluzole's effectiveness in reducing spinal neuron excitability, reverting behavioral phenotypes, and improving the deficits in motor nerve circuitry development in sod1 mutant zebrafish by modulating the pacemaker sodium current (INaP).Additionally, the antioxidant olesoxime was found to protect the T70I sod1 zebrafish embryos against oxidative stress (Da Costa et al., 2014).The oxidoreductase activity of protein disulphide isomerase (PDI) and BMC ((+/-)trans-1,2-Bis (2-mercaptoacetamido) cyclohexane) also improves motor function in zebrafish sod1 mutants (Parakh et al., 2020).The iron complex of an amphiphilic corrole (1-Fe) enhanced the locomotor activity in the sod1 mutants (Soll et al., 2021).
Methylene blue has also effectively reduced oxidative stress and neuronal toxicity in zebrafish models of tdp-43 and fus (Vaccaro et al., 2012).Vaccaro et al. (2013) tested salubrinal, guanabenz and phenazine, and methylene blue, finding that all four compounds reduced ER stress, protecting tdp-43 mutants against oxidative stress and paralysis.Riemslagh et al. ( 2021) recently showed that use of Trolox reduces oxidative stress which in turn fully suppresses the poly-GR toxicity in zebrafish embryos with abnormal motor neuron morphology caused by the microinjection of poly-GR RNA.Terbutaline sulfate, a drug commonly used for asthma treatment, was effective in rescuing the TDP-43 pathological symptoms, including axon and NMJ degeneration (Paik et al., 2015).Findings from the study of Armstrong and Drapeau (2013a) revealed that hallmark features of ALS, including motor phenotypes and NMJ abnormalities, can also be rescued by the chronic treatment of tdp-43 mutant zebrafish larvae with two L-type calcium channel agonists, FPL 64176, or Bay K 8644.Patten et al. (2017) established that pimozide, a neuroleptic compound, works as a T-type calcium channel antagonist, which reduces motor defects and stabilizes neuromuscular transmission in the tdp-43 mutant zebrafish.It similarly benefits human SOD1-G93A and FUS-R521H Tg zebrafish and reduces motor deficits in them as well.A small molecule derivative of pimozide, TRVA242 has also shown effectiveness in improving the locomotor, motorneuron and NMJ synaptic deficits of tdp-43, sod1, and c9orf72 mutant zebrafish models (Bose et al., 2019b).Mdivi-1 blocks Drp1 activity and effectively prevents motor axon degeneration in G93A sod1 and Q331K tdp-43 mutant zebrafish embryos (Choi  (2022) showed that in tdp-43 mutant larvae, overexpression of phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK1) or treatment with terazosin significantly increased the distance traveled during tail-touch evoked escape response (TEER).Interestingly, overexpression of PGK1 is also effective in treating c9orf72 mutant larvae, but not terazosin (Chaytow et al., 2022).
In a recent study, Goldshtein et al. (2020) demonstrated that administration of a combination of Ciprofloxacin and Celecoxib improved the motor performance in sod1 and tdp-43 mutants.This treatment also rectified impaired motor neuron and microglia morphology and abnormalties in the NMJ structure of sod1 mutants.Recently, Telbivudine, a uracil-like nucleoside compound, has been found to interact with the tryptophan residue at position 32 (W32) of Sod1.This residue is known for contributing to the Sod1-induced toxicity.Thereby, Telbivudine effectively rescues the axonal and motor phenotypes induced by the wild type or mutant sod1 in a dose-dependent manner (DuVal et al., 2019).Corman et al. (2019), through chemical screening, identified sodium phenylbutyrate and bromodomain and extra-terminal domain (BET) inhibitors as promising drugs for alleviating nucleolar stress caused by dipeptide repeat proteins (DPRs) in developing zebrafish embryos.Moreover, mutations in some of the rare genes associated with ALS, i.e., sequestosome-1 (SQSTM1) cause behavioral and axonal anomalies and upregulation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling in zebrafish embryos.Interestingly, exposure to rapamycin, a well-known inhibitor of the mTOR pathway, rescued the locomotor phenotype in the mutant fish (Lattante et al., 2015).
While a number of studies have been conducted in the past for screening drugs for the treatment of HSP and ALS, the capacity of zebrafish to identify the therapeutic compounds for SMA has yet to be explored much (Table 4).Three of the tetrahydroindoles, usually known for altering the metabolism of ./fnins. .amyloid precursor protein (APP), rescued motor axon defects in a zebrafish model of SMA (Gassman et al., 2013).In their study, Wishart et al. (2014) found that perturbations in ubiquitin homeostasis, including reduction in the levels of ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme 1 (UBA1), was sufficient to cause neuromuscular pathology in the zebrafish model of SMA (Wishart et al., 2014).Dysregulation of ubiquitylation pathways also caused the accumulation of β-catenin.Notably, inhibition of β-catenin by quercetin helped mitigate the neuromuscular pathology, thereby highlighting the importance of ubiquitin homeostasis and βcatenin as potential therapeutic targets for SMA.Boyd et al. (2017) highlighted the significance of bioenergetic pathways, particularly the bioenergetic protein phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (Pgk1), as a therapeutic target for SMA.They showed that treating Pgk1 with terazosin, a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug, which binds and activates Pgk1, rescues motor axon defects in a zebrafish SMA model.Taking a different approach, Riessland et al. identified a reduction of the neuronal calcium sensor neurocalcin delta (NCALD) as a protective SMA modifier.They found that NCALD works as a negative regulator of endocytosis and its knockdown ameliorates endocytosis and SMA associated pathological defects in zebrafish (Riessland et al., 2017).Synaptic degeneration is a common feature of many neurodegenerative disorders including SMA, yet there are few drugs available to counteract the synaptic destabilization defects.Oprişoreanu et al. (2021) characterized an automated screening paradigm in zebrafish to identify compounds that stabilize the neuromuscular synapses.Out of 982 compounds tested, four (Apicidin, MG132, IOX1, and dipyridamole) significantly rescued motor axon length.IOX1 and dipyridamole effectively corrected abnormal presynaptic neuromuscular synapse morphology.Moreover, dipyridamole also ameliorated axonal growth defects in zebrafish SMA mutants (Oprişoreanu et al., 2021).

Conclusion
In conclusion, the use of zebrafish models has been invaluable in Motor Neuron Disease (MND) research.These models replicate the key features of human MNDs, providing the benefits of genetic tractability and high-throughput drug screening.However, merely having models that replicate disease phenotypes is insufficient for identifying potential treatments.To create more effective treatments, the cellular and molecular basis of neuronal degeneration has to be revealed.The initial step in this direction is to develop stable zebrafish MND models.In particular, replicating patient mutations would be highly beneficial.Contrarily, most existing studies have relied on transient approaches to target the genes in zebrafish, like MO-based mutagenesis.These approaches are often prone to create off-target effects that mask the real nature of the mutation.The advent of CRISPR-Cas9-mediated mutagenesis now makes it possible to develop stable mutants with pinpoint precision.CRISPR-Cas9's extreme efficacy enables us to generate exact copies of patient mutations, which can now be analyzed in great detail in the zebrafish model.development of patient mutations is a prerequisite to the analysis of the aforementioned cellular and molecular basis of neuronal degeneration.The significant similarity between human and zebrafish genes, both at genetic and functional level, allows us to trace the repercussions of the mutation through the different biological contexts, from molecular to neuronal and, finally, behavioral.For instance, in most Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia (HSP) subtypes, abnormalities in various pathways, such as axon transport, lipid metabolism, ER morphogenesis, endosomal trafficking, autophagy etc, are believed to contribute to the disease's pathology.Distinguishing which of these pathways are directly responsible for the disease and which are secondary effects is essential for a comprehensive understanding of the disease mechanisms and for the development of targeted therapies.
Additionally, it is worth noting that the vast majority of studies conducted to understand MNDs in zebrafish use larvae, with minimal research on adult specimens.Considering that many MNDs show late-onset symptoms, crucial genes might be overlooked in larval screens.To accurately study these late-onset disease phenotypes, we must develop methods for adult screening, biochemically and behaviorally.Effective and interpretable behavioral screening necessitates further fundamental research into the behavioral patterns of adult zebrafish.Therefore, future research directions should include the development of stable genetic mutants, the establishment of screening techniques for adult zebrafish, and a comprehensive understanding of adult zebrafish behavior.

FIGURE
FIGUREDiagrammatic representation of the strategy for high-throughput drug screening in zebrafish.Zebrafish embryos are subjected to large scale inexpensive chemical screen in -well plates and are assessed for changes in behavior, drug toxicity, metabolic profile, and other phenotypes.The lead compounds are either first tested in mammalian model or straight away undergo clinical trials.Only the compounds which are approved for safety and e cacy by the food and drug administration (FDA) are tested directly in human patients.
TABLE Characterisation of the disease phenotypes in zebrafish model of HSP.In the same study, Martin et al. (2012) also targeted spastizin with the MO and observed similar phenotypes in spastizin morphants just like in spatacsin ones.Intriguingly, in another study in zebrafish, Kanagaraj et al.
TABLE Delineation of the disease phenotypes in zebrafish model of ALS.
Bose et al. (2019a))d for the loss of one TARDBP ortholog with a splice variant of the other,Hewamadduma et al. (2013),Schmid et al. (2013), andBose et al. (2019a)generated homozygous double mutants (tardbp-/-; tardbpl-/-) targeting both orthologs.These mutants had issues with spinal cord motor neuron growth, muscle degeneration, mispatterned vasculature, and early death. of TABLE Characterization of the disease phenotypes in zebrafish model of SMA.
TABLE List of the compounds tested in zebrafish models of HSP, ALS, and SMA with their e ect on the disease phenotype.