AUTHOR=Gilchrist Abriana , Aylward Brandon S. , Laine Christopher M. , Karp Harvey 

TITLE=Maturation of infant sleep during the first 6 months of life: a mini-scoping review

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Neuroscience

VOLUME=Volume 19 - 2025

YEAR=2025

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2025.1581325

DOI=10.3389/fnins.2025.1581325

ISSN=1662-453X

ABSTRACT=IntroductionSeveral foundational aspects of neurodevelopment occur during the early months of infant life, most notably the maturation and consolidation of wake/sleep cycles. Past studies have had difficulty quantifying infant sleep, with most researchers relying on low-resolution caregiver surveys. Data obtained from nightly measurements have not yet been aggregated across studies to clarify developmental trajectories and population norms. This mini-scoping review assesses data collected from actigraphy and sleep diaries; the two most common nightly infant sleep measurement techniques.MethodsThe PubMed database was used to identify studies from 2000 to 2024 utilizing actigraphy and/or sleep diaries, and which report total night sleep (TNS), longest sleep stretch (LSS), and/or frequency of night wakings (NW) during the first 6 months of life. Data was then compiled per metric to reveal the extent of inter-and intra-study variability, and curves were fit to highlight developmental trajectories.ResultsA total of 35 articles met inclusion criteria (16 studies using actigraphy only, 8 studies using sleep diary only, and 11 studies using both actigraphy and sleep diaries). The sample sizes of these studies ranged from 13 to 320 infants. The majority of studies (N = 28) reported two or fewer age data points.ConclusionAggregation and regression revealed longitudinal trends, but highlighted variability within and between studies, as well as systematic differences between measurement methods. In order to establish reliable benchmarks, future studies must include well defined, objective measures of sleep as well as greater methodological consistency, larger cohorts, more frequent sampling, and clear disclosure of methodological limitations.