Corrigendum: Can ChatGPT Help Patients Understand Radiopharmaceutical Extravasations?

Madeleine Alvarez^*

• Cary Academy, Cary, United States

Corrigendum: Can ChatGPT Help Patients Understand Radiopharmaceutical Extravasations? Name of all authors as they appear in the published original article (INSERT ONLY IF correcting author names or adding authors. Insert the correct version of the author list) Affiliations of all authors as they appear in the published original version of the article (INSERT ONLY IF correcting affiliation(s) or adding affiliation(s). Insert the correct version of the affiliation(s)) * Correspondence: Maddie.Alvarez6@gmail.com Keywords: radiopharmaceutical extravasation, SNMMI, diagnostic imaging, medical event reporting, AI in healthcare, nuclear medicine procedures, patient education AI Corrigendum on: BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article Front. Nucl. Med., 05 November 2024 Sec. Radiopharmacy and Radiochemistry Volume 4 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnume.2024.1469487 Incorrect Reference In the published article, the links for References 5, 6, and 7 are not functional. Please note that the references themselves are correct; the issue lies solely with the links. These links were assigned during the publishing process, and we did not have the opportunity to review them prior to publication. The non-functional links are: 5. Misadministration Reporting Requirements. 45 Fed. Reg. (May 14, 1980): 31701–31705). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Misadministration+Reporting+Requirements 6. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Federal Register—Reporting Nuclear Medicine Injection Extravasations as Medical Events. (2022). p. 80474. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=U.S.+Nuclear+Regulatory+Commission 7. NRC. secy-22-0043: petition for rulemaking and rulemaking plan on reporting nuclear medicine injection extravasations as medical events. (2022). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=secy-22-0043:+petition+for+rulemaking+and+rulemaking+plan+on+reporting+nuclear+medicine+injection+extravasations+as+medical+events&publication_year=2022 The correct, working links are: 5. Misadministration Reporting Requirements. 45 Fed. Reg. (May 14, 1980): 31701–31705). https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/fedreg/fr045/fr045095/fr045095.pdf 6. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Federal Register—Reporting Nuclear Medicine Injection Extravasations as Medical Events. (2022). p. 80474. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/12/30/2022-28356/reporting-nuclear-medicine-injection-extravasations-as-medical-events 7. NRC. secy-22-0043: petition for rulemaking and rulemaking plan on reporting nuclear medicine injection extravasations as medical events. (2022). https://www.nrc.gov/materials/miau/med-use-toolkit/reporting-nuclear-medicine-injection-extravasations.html The links for footnotes 18, 19, and 20 are also not functional. The non-functional links are: Footnote 18. https://s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-snmmi/files/production/public/SNMMI%20statement_final%20signed%20w%20letterhead%209-29-20.pdf Footnote 19. https://s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-snmmi/files/production/public/docs/hpra/NRC%20Comments%20on%20Extravasations%20Rulemaking%209-1-2023.pdf Footnote 20. (Same as 19). https://s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-snmmi/files/production/public/docs/hpra/NRC%20Comments%20on%20Extravasations%20Rulemaking%209-1-2023.pdf The correct, working links are: Footnote 18. https://snmmi.org/common/Uploaded%20files/Web/Position%20Statements/SNMMI%20statement_final%20signed%20w%20letterhead%209-29-20.pdf Footnote 19. https://sites.snmmi.org/common/Uploaded%20files/Web/Advocacy%20and%20Initiatives/2023-09-07/NRC%20Comments%20on%20Extravasations%20Rulemaking%209-1-2023.pdf Footnote 20. (Same as 19) https://sites.snmmi.org/common/Uploaded%20files/Web/Advocacy%20and%20Initiatives/2023-09-07/NRC%20Comments%20on%20Extravasations%20Rulemaking%209-1-2023.pdf The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated. Text Correction In the published article, there was an error. There was an error in the cited statistics and the source associated with Footnote 13. The incorrect citation resulted from human error in our reference management process. Specifically, the wrong link was inadvertently transferred into the final paper from our list of footnote links. Upon further review, we also discovered that the proper link for the 2023 Klick Health study did not contain the original data we referenced. Despite these errors, the main point made in the original paragraph—that consumers are relatively comfortable with AI playing a role in healthcare—remains relevant and important to our discussion. Therefore, the paragraph has been revised accordingly, and a new, accurate footnote has been provided to support our statement. A correction has been made to Discussion, No sub-section, Paragraph Three. This sentence previously stated: “According to a 2023 study by Klick Health13, 79% of U.S. consumers are willing to use AI for their healthcare needs, and 45% believe AI will have a significant impact on healthcare.” Previous Footnote 13: https://digitalhealthmonitor.org/stateofdigitalhealth23 The corrected sentence appears below: “According to a recent survey of 2,000 U.S. adults13, more Americans trust social media and healthcare websites for advice over a medical professional, 94% trust AI to handle certain health-related tasks, and over half (52%) have consulted large language models like ChatGPT for medical diagnoses, reflecting the growing role of AI in personal healthcare decisions.” Corrected Footnote 13: https://www.usertesting.com/resources/reports/consumer-perceptions-ai-healthcare The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.