AUTHOR=Zhang Xiangqun , Wu Junyuan , Dong Hongmeng , Shang Na , Li Yixuan , Zhang Ying , Guo Shubin , Mei Xue 

TITLE=The impact of supplementing vitamin D through different methods on the prognosis of COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Nutrition

VOLUME=Volume 11 - 2024

YEAR=2024

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/nutrition/articles/10.3389/fnut.2024.1441847

DOI=10.3389/fnut.2024.1441847

ISSN=2296-861X

ABSTRACT=To analyze the impact of different methods of Vitamin D administration on the prognosis of COVID-19 patients.Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across four databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane, up to January 5, 2024. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and cohort studies that compared Vitamin D supplementation with control groups in COVID-19 patients. Outcomes of interest were mortality rate, ICU (Intensive Care Unit) admission rate, length of hospital stay, and endotracheal intubation rate. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the dosing regimen (single-dose vs. continuous-dose), total Vitamin D intake within 14 days (≥100,000 IU vs. <100,000 IU), and baseline serum Vitamin D levels (deficient group: 25OHD < 30 ng/mL vs. non-restricted group). A random-effects model was employed for meta-analysis to account for heterogeneity among studies.Results: Vitamin D supplementation significantly reduced the mortality rate (RR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.54-0.94, I²=54%, P=0.02), with continuous dosing being more effective compared to single-dose  and lower total doses (<100,000 IU)showing greater benefit . Mortality was significantly reduced in the Vitamin D-deficient group (25OHD < 30 ng/mL)  but not in the non-restricted group.Regarding ICU admission, supplementation reduced ICU admission rates (RR=0.58, 95% CI: 0.38-0.88, I²=74%, P=0.01),, with continuous dosing being more effective than single-dose , and lower doses (<100,000 IU) providing more significant reduction . ICU admission rates were significantly reduced in the Vitamin D-deficient group but not in the non-restricted group. For length of hospital stay, no significant differences were observed between Vitamin D and control groups (MD=-1, 95% CI: -2.16 to 0.16, P=0.13), and subgroup analyses by dosing regimen, total dose, and baseline Vitamin D levels also showed no significant differences. Similarly, for endotracheal intubation, there was no significant difference in intubation rates between groups (RR=0.78, 95% CI: 0.56-1.08, P=0.13).Conclusion:Vitamin D supplementation improves clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients by reducing mortality and ICU admission rates, particularly when administered continuously with a total dose of less than 100,000 IU over 14 days, and among those with baseline Vitamin D deficiency (25OHD < 30 ng/mL). However, there were no significant effects on the length of hospital stay or endotracheal intubation rates.