SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Oncol. Rev.
Sec. Oncology Reviews: Reviews
Comparative Effects of Exercise and Nutritional Interventions on Muscle Mass and Body Composition in Adults With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
- SG
Siqi Gao
- YD
Yanting Dong
Capital Institute of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Introduction: Loss of muscle mass and changes in body composition are common in adults with cancer. We compared exercise, nutritional, and combined strategies and assessed the certainty and clinical interpretability of the evidence. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science through April 2026 for randomized controlled trials reporting appendicular skeletal muscle mass, skeletal muscle index, lean mass, body mass index, body weight, or fat mass. Eight nodes were evaluated: standard of care (SOC), active low-intensity control (ALC), resistance exercise (RE), multicomponent exercise (ME), nutrition-only intervention (NOI), exercise-nutrition intervention without resistance exercise as the primary component (ENI), resistance exercise plus nutrition-only intervention (RE+NOI), and comprehensive exercise-nutrition intervention incorporating resistance exercise (ENI+RE). Random-effects network meta-analysis produced mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs); certainty was assessed with GRADE/CINeMA. Results: Twenty-one trials and eight intervention nodes were included. Most network estimates were of low certainty. ME was associated with lower BMI than SOC (MD -3.53, 95% CI -7.01 to -0.04), but not with statistically significant differences in body weight or fat mass. ENI+RE was associated with lower lean mass than SOC (MD -6.72, 95% CI -12.43 to -1.02); this sparse, low-certainty estimate should not be interpreted as evidence that combined interventions are harmful or ineffective. No intervention showed a consistent advantage across muscle mass outcomes. Conclusion: Relative rankings did not establish clinical superiority. Sparse direct evidence, heterogeneous cancer and treatment contexts, varied intervention protocols and measurement methods, and low certainty limit inference. More standardized head-to-head trials are needed.
Summary
Keywords
Body Composition, Cancer, Exercise, Network meta-analysis, nutrition, randomized controlled trial
Received
03 July 2026
Accepted
30 September 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Gao and Dong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yanting Dong
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.